DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix a Isentropic Flow Table

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Appendix a Isentropic Flow Table Appendix A Isentropic Flow Table TableA.1 displayes the isentropic flow properties for γ = 1.4. Table A.1 Isentropic flow properties for γ = 1.4 ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ M Tt /T pt /p ρt /ρ A/A T/T p/p ρ/ρ 0.02 1.00E+00 1.00E+00 1.00E+00 2.89E+01 1.20E+00 1.89E+00 1.58E+00 0.04 1.00E+00 1.00E+00 1.00E+00 1.45E+01 1.20E+00 1.89E+00 1.58E+00 0.06 1.00E+00 1.00E+00 1.00E+00 9.67E+00 1.20E+00 1.89E+00 1.57E+00 0.08 1.00E+00 1.00E+00 1.00E+00 7.26E+00 1.20E+00 1.88E+00 1.57E+00 0.1 1.00E+00 1.01E+00 1.01E+00 5.82E+00 1.20E+00 1.88E+00 1.57E+00 0.12 1.00E+00 1.01E+00 1.01E+00 4.86E+00 1.20E+00 1.87E+00 1.57E+00 0.14 1.00E+00 1.01E+00 1.01E+00 4.18E+00 1.20E+00 1.87E+00 1.56E+00 0.16 1.01E+00 1.02E+00 1.01E+00 3.67E+00 1.19E+00 1.86E+00 1.56E+00 0.18 1.01E+00 1.02E+00 1.02E+00 3.28E+00 1.19E+00 1.85E+00 1.55E+00 0.2 1.01E+00 1.03E+00 1.02E+00 2.96E+00 1.19E+00 1.84E+00 1.55E+00 0.22 1.01E+00 1.03E+00 1.02E+00 2.71E+00 1.19E+00 1.83E+00 1.54E+00 0.24 1.01E+00 1.04E+00 1.03E+00 2.50E+00 1.19E+00 1.82E+00 1.53E+00 0.26 1.01E+00 1.05E+00 1.03E+00 2.32E+00 1.18E+00 1.81E+00 1.53E+00 0.28 1.02E+00 1.06E+00 1.04E+00 2.17E+00 1.18E+00 1.79E+00 1.52E+00 0.3 1.02E+00 1.06E+00 1.05E+00 2.04E+00 1.18E+00 1.78E+00 1.51E+00 0.32 1.02E+00 1.07E+00 1.05E+00 1.92E+00 1.18E+00 1.76E+00 1.50E+00 0.34 1.02E+00 1.08E+00 1.06E+00 1.82E+00 1.17E+00 1.75E+00 1.49E+00 0.36 1.03E+00 1.09E+00 1.07E+00 1.74E+00 1.17E+00 1.73E+00 1.48E+00 0.38 1.03E+00 1.10E+00 1.07E+00 1.66E+00 1.17E+00 1.71E+00 1.47E+00 0.4 1.03E+00 1.12E+00 1.08E+00 1.59E+00 1.16E+00 1.70E+00 1.46E+00 0.42 1.04E+00 1.13E+00 1.09E+00 1.53E+00 1.16E+00 1.68E+00 1.45E+00 0.44 1.04E+00 1.14E+00 1.10E+00 1.47E+00 1.16E+00 1.66E+00 1.43E+00 0.46 1.04E+00 1.16E+00 1.11E+00 1.42E+00 1.15E+00 1.64E+00 1.42E+00 (continued) © Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015 513 R. Vos and S. Farokhi, Introduction to Transonic Aerodynamics, Fluid Mechanics and Its Applications 110, DOI 10.1007/978-94-017-9747-4 514 Appendix A: Isentropic Flow Table Table A.1 (continued) ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ M Tt /T pt /p ρt /ρ A/A T/T p/p ρ/ρ 0.48 1.05E+00 1.17E+00 1.12E+00 1.38E+00 1.15E+00 1.62E+00 1.41E+00 0.5 1.05E+00 1.19E+00 1.13E+00 1.34E+00 1.14E+00 1.60E+00 1.40E+00 0.52 1.05E+00 1.20E+00 1.14E+00 1.30E+00 1.14E+00 1.57E+00 1.38E+00 0.54 1.06E+00 1.22E+00 1.15E+00 1.27E+00 1.13E+00 1.55E+00 1.37E+00 0.56 1.06E+00 1.24E+00 1.16E+00 1.24E+00 1.13E+00 1.53E+00 1.35E+00 0.58 1.07E+00 1.26E+00 1.18E+00 1.21E+00 1.12E+00 1.51E+00 1.34E+00 0.6 1.07E+00 1.28E+00 1.19E+00 1.19E+00 1.12E+00 1.48E+00 1.33E+00 0.62 1.08E+00 1.30E+00 1.20E+00 1.17E+00 1.11E+00 1.46E+00 1.31E+00 0.64 1.08E+00 1.32E+00 1.22E+00 1.15E+00 1.11E+00 1.44E+00 1.30E+00 0.66 1.09E+00 1.34E+00 1.23E+00 1.13E+00 1.10E+00 1.41E+00 1.28E+00 0.68 1.09E+00 1.36E+00 1.25E+00 1.11E+00 1.10E+00 1.39E+00 1.26E+00 0.7 1.10E+00 1.39E+00 1.26E+00 1.09E+00 1.09E+00 1.36E+00 1.25E+00 0.72 1.10E+00 1.41E+00 1.28E+00 1.08E+00 1.09E+00 1.34E+00 1.23E+00 0.74 1.11E+00 1.44E+00 1.30E+00 1.07E+00 1.08E+00 1.32E+00 1.22E+00 0.76 1.12E+00 1.47E+00 1.31E+00 1.06E+00 1.08E+00 1.29E+00 1.20E+00 0.78 1.12E+00 1.49E+00 1.33E+00 1.05E+00 1.07E+00 1.27E+00 1.18E+00 0.8 1.13E+00 1.52E+00 1.35E+00 1.04E+00 1.06E+00 1.24E+00 1.17E+00 0.82 1.13E+00 1.56E+00 1.37E+00 1.03E+00 1.06E+00 1.22E+00 1.15E+00 0.84 1.14E+00 1.59E+00 1.39E+00 1.02E+00 1.05E+00 1.19E+00 1.13E+00 0.86 1.15E+00 1.62E+00 1.41E+00 1.02E+00 1.05E+00 1.17E+00 1.12E+00 0.88 1.15E+00 1.66E+00 1.43E+00 1.01E+00 1.04E+00 1.14E+00 1.10E+00 0.9 1.16E+00 1.69E+00 1.46E+00 1.01E+00 1.03E+00 1.12E+00 1.08E+00 0.92 1.17E+00 1.73E+00 1.48E+00 1.01E+00 1.03E+00 1.10E+00 1.07E+00 0.94 1.18E+00 1.77E+00 1.50E+00 1.00E+00 1.02E+00 1.07E+00 1.05E+00 0.96 1.18E+00 1.81E+00 1.53E+00 1.00E+00 1.01E+00 1.05E+00 1.03E+00 0.98 1.19E+00 1.85E+00 1.55E+00 1.00E+00 1.01E+00 1.02E+00 1.02E+00 1 1.20E+00 1.89E+00 1.58E+00 1.00E+00 1.00E+00 1.00E+00 1.00E+00 1.02 1.21E+00 1.94E+00 1.60E+00 1.00E+00 9.93E-01 9.77E-01 9.83E-01 1.04 1.22E+00 1.98E+00 1.63E+00 1.00E+00 9.87E-01 9.54E-01 9.67E-01 1.06 1.22E+00 2.03E+00 1.66E+00 1.00E+00 9.80E-01 9.31E-01 9.50E-01 1.08 1.23E+00 2.08E+00 1.69E+00 1.01E+00 9.73E-01 9.09E-01 9.34E-01 1.1 1.24E+00 2.14E+00 1.72E+00 1.01E+00 9.66E-01 8.87E-01 9.18E-01 1.12 1.25E+00 2.19E+00 1.75E+00 1.01E+00 9.59E-01 8.65E-01 9.01E-01 1.14 1.26E+00 2.24E+00 1.78E+00 1.02E+00 9.52E-01 8.43E-01 8.85E-01 1.16 1.27E+00 2.30E+00 1.81E+00 1.02E+00 9.46E-01 8.22E-01 8.69E-01 1.18 1.28E+00 2.36E+00 1.85E+00 1.02E+00 9.39E-01 8.01E-01 8.54E-01 1.2 1.29E+00 2.43E+00 1.88E+00 1.03E+00 9.32E-01 7.81E-01 8.38E-01 1.22 1.30E+00 2.49E+00 1.92E+00 1.04E+00 9.25E-01 7.60E-01 8.22E-01 1.24 1.31E+00 2.56E+00 1.95E+00 1.04E+00 9.18E-01 7.41E-01 8.07E-01 (continued) Appendix A: Isentropic Flow Table 515 Table A.1 (continued) ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ M Tt /T pt /p ρt /ρ A/A T/T p/p ρ/ρ 1.26 1.32E+00 2.63E+00 1.99E+00 1.05E+00 9.11E-01 7.21E-01 7.92E-01 1.28 1.33E+00 2.70E+00 2.03E+00 1.06E+00 9.04E-01 7.02E-01 7.77E-01 1.3 1.34E+00 2.77E+00 2.07E+00 1.07E+00 8.97E-01 6.83E-01 7.62E-01 1.32 1.35E+00 2.85E+00 2.11E+00 1.08E+00 8.90E-01 6.65E-01 7.47E-01 1.34 1.36E+00 2.93E+00 2.15E+00 1.08E+00 8.83E-01 6.47E-01 7.33E-01 1.36 1.37E+00 3.01E+00 2.20E+00 1.09E+00 8.76E-01 6.29E-01 7.18E-01 1.38 1.38E+00 3.09E+00 2.24E+00 1.10E+00 8.69E-01 6.12E-01 7.04E-01 1.4 1.39E+00 3.18E+00 2.29E+00 1.11E+00 8.62E-01 5.95E-01 6.90E-01 1.42 1.40E+00 3.27E+00 2.33E+00 1.13E+00 8.55E-01 5.78E-01 6.76E-01 1.44 1.41E+00 3.37E+00 2.38E+00 1.14E+00 8.48E-01 5.62E-01 6.63E-01 1.46 1.43E+00 3.47E+00 2.43E+00 1.15E+00 8.41E-01 5.46E-01 6.49E-01 1.48 1.44E+00 3.57E+00 2.48E+00 1.16E+00 8.34E-01 5.31E-01 6.36E-01 1.5 1.45E+00 3.67E+00 2.53E+00 1.18E+00 8.28E-01 5.16E-01 6.23E-01 1.52 1.46E+00 3.78E+00 2.58E+00 1.19E+00 8.21E-01 5.01E-01 6.10E-01 1.54 1.47E+00 3.89E+00 2.64E+00 1.20E+00 8.14E-01 4.86E-01 5.98E-01 1.56 1.49E+00 4.01E+00 2.70E+00 1.22E+00 8.07E-01 4.72E-01 5.85E-01 1.58 1.50E+00 4.13E+00 2.75E+00 1.23E+00 8.00E-01 4.59E-01 5.73E-01 1.6 1.51E+00 4.25E+00 2.81E+00 1.25E+00 7.94E-01 4.45E-01 5.61E-01 1.62 1.52E+00 4.38E+00 2.87E+00 1.27E+00 7.87E-01 4.32E-01 5.49E-01 1.64 1.54E+00 4.51E+00 2.93E+00 1.28E+00 7.80E-01 4.20E-01 5.38E-01 1.66 1.55E+00 4.65E+00 3.00E+00 1.30E+00 7.74E-01 4.07E-01 5.26E-01 1.68 1.56E+00 4.79E+00 3.06E+00 1.32E+00 7.67E-01 3.95E-01 5.15E-01 1.7 1.58E+00 4.94E+00 3.13E+00 1.34E+00 7.60E-01 3.84E-01 5.04E-01 1.72 1.59E+00 5.09E+00 3.20E+00 1.36E+00 7.54E-01 3.72E-01 4.94E-01 1.74 1.61E+00 5.24E+00 3.27E+00 1.38E+00 7.47E-01 3.61E-01 4.83E-01 1.76 1.62E+00 5.41E+00 3.34E+00 1.40E+00 7.41E-01 3.50E-01 4.73E-01 1.78 1.63E+00 5.57E+00 3.41E+00 1.42E+00 7.35E-01 3.40E-01 4.62E-01 1.8 1.65E+00 5.75E+00 3.49E+00 1.44E+00 7.28E-01 3.29E-01 4.52E-01 1.82 1.66E+00 5.92E+00 3.56E+00 1.46E+00 7.22E-01 3.20E-01 4.43E-01 1.84 1.68E+00 6.11E+00 3.64E+00 1.48E+00 7.16E-01 3.10E-01 4.33E-01 1.86 1.69E+00 6.30E+00 3.72E+00 1.51E+00 7.09E-01 3.00E-01 4.24E-01 1.88 1.71E+00 6.50E+00 3.81E+00 1.53E+00 7.03E-01 2.91E-01 4.14E-01 1.9 1.72E+00 6.70E+00 3.89E+00 1.56E+00 6.97E-01 2.83E-01 4.05E-01 1.92 1.74E+00 6.91E+00 3.98E+00 1.58E+00 6.91E-01 2.74E-01 3.97E-01 1.94 1.75E+00 7.13E+00 4.07E+00 1.61E+00 6.85E-01 2.66E-01 3.88E-01 1.96 1.77E+00 7.35E+00 4.16E+00 1.63E+00 6.79E-01 2.57E-01 3.79E-01 1.98 1.78E+00 7.58E+00 4.25E+00 1.66E+00 6.73E-01 2.50E-01 3.71E-01 2 1.80E+00 7.82E+00 4.35E+00 1.69E+00 6.67E-01 2.42E-01 3.63E-01 2.02 1.82E+00 8.07E+00 4.44E+00 1.72E+00 6.61E-01 2.35E-01 3.55E-01 (continued) 516 Appendix A: Isentropic Flow Table Table A.1 (continued) ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ M Tt /T pt /p ρt /ρ A/A T/T p/p ρ/ρ 2.04 1.83E+00 8.33E+00 4.54E+00 1.75E+00 6.55E-01 2.27E-01 3.47E-01 2.06 1.85E+00 8.59E+00 4.65E+00 1.78E+00 6.49E-01 2.20E-01 3.39E-01 2.08 1.87E+00 8.86E+00 4.75E+00 1.81E+00 6.43E-01 2.14E-01 3.32E-01 2.1 1.88E+00 9.14E+00 4.86E+00 1.84E+00 6.38E-01 2.07E-01 3.25E-01 2.12 1.90E+00 9.44E+00 4.97E+00 1.87E+00 6.32E-01 2.01E-01 3.17E-01 2.14 1.92E+00 9.73E+00 5.08E+00 1.90E+00 6.26E-01 1.94E-01 3.10E-01 2.16 1.93E+00 1.00E+01 5.20E+00 1.94E+00 6.21E-01 1.88E-01 3.04E-01 2.18 1.95E+00 1.04E+01 5.31E+00 1.97E+00 6.15E-01 1.83E-01 2.97E-01 2.2 1.97E+00 1.07E+01 5.43E+00 2.01E+00 6.10E-01 1.77E-01 2.90E-01 2.22 1.99E+00 1.10E+01 5.56E+00 2.04E+00 6.04E-01 1.72E-01 2.84E-01 2.24 2.00E+00 1.14E+01 5.68E+00 2.08E+00 5.99E-01 1.66E-01 2.78E-01 2.26 2.02E+00 1.17E+01 5.81E+00 2.12E+00 5.94E-01 1.61E-01 2.71E-01 2.28 2.04E+00 1.21E+01 5.94E+00 2.15E+00 5.88E-01 1.56E-01 2.65E-01 2.3 2.06E+00 1.25E+01 6.08E+00 2.19E+00 5.83E-01 1.51E-01 2.60E-01 2.32 2.08E+00 1.29E+01 6.21E+00 2.23E+00 5.78E-01 1.47E-01 2.54E-01 2.34 2.10E+00 1.33E+01 6.35E+00 2.27E+00 5.73E-01 1.42E-01 2.48E-01 2.36 2.11E+00 1.37E+01 6.50E+00 2.32E+00 5.68E-01 1.38E-01 2.43E-01 2.38 2.13E+00 1.42E+01 6.64E+00 2.36E+00 5.63E-01 1.34E-01 2.37E-01 2.4 2.15E+00 1.46E+01 6.79E+00 2.40E+00 5.58E-01 1.29E-01 2.32E-01 2.42 2.17E+00 1.51E+01 6.95E+00 2.45E+00 5.53E-01 1.26E-01 2.27E-01 2.44 2.19E+00 1.56E+01 7.10E+00 2.49E+00 5.48E-01 1.22E-01 2.22E-01 2.46 2.21E+00 1.61E+01 7.26E+00 2.54E+00 5.43E-01 1.18E-01 2.17E-01 2.48 2.23E+00 1.66E+01 7.43E+00 2.59E+00 5.38E-01 1.14E-01 2.12E-01 2.5 2.25E+00 1.71E+01 7.59E+00 2.64E+00 5.33E-01 1.11E-01 2.08E-01 2.52 2.27E+00 1.76E+01 7.76E+00 2.69E+00 5.29E-01 1.07E-01 2.03E-01 2.54 2.29E+00 1.82E+01 7.94E+00 2.74E+00 5.24E-01 1.04E-01 1.99E-01 2.56 2.31E+00 1.88E+01 8.12E+00 2.79E+00 5.19E-01 1.01E-01 1.94E-01 2.58 2.33E+00 1.93E+01 8.30E+00 2.84E+00 5.15E-01 9.78E-02 1.90E-01 2.6 2.35E+00 2.00E+01 8.48E+00 2.90E+00 5.10E-01 9.49E-02 1.86E-01 2.62 2.37E+00 2.06E+01 8.67E+00 2.95E+00 5.06E-01 9.20E-02 1.82E-01
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Problems of High Speed and Altitude Robert Stengel, Aircraft Flight Dynamics MAE 331, 2018
    12/14/18 Problems of High Speed and Altitude Robert Stengel, Aircraft Flight Dynamics MAE 331, 2018 Learning Objectives • Effects of air compressibility on flight stability • Variable sweep-angle wings • Aero-mechanical stability augmentation • Altitude/airspeed instability Flight Dynamics 470-480 Airplane Stability and Control Chapter 11 Copyright 2018 by Robert Stengel. All rights reserved. For educational use only. http://www.princeton.edu/~stengel/MAE331.html 1 http://www.princeton.edu/~stengel/FlightDynamics.html Outrunning Your Own Bullets • On Sep 21, 1956, Grumman test pilot Tom Attridge shot himself down, moments after this picture was taken • Test firing 20mm cannons of F11F Tiger at M = 1 • The combination of events – Decay in projectile velocity and trajectory drop – 0.5-G descent of the F11F, due in part to its nose pitching down from firing low-mounted guns – Flight paths of aircraft and bullets in the same vertical plane – 11 sec after firing, Attridge flew through the bullet cluster, with 3 hits, 1 in engine • Aircraft crashed 1 mile short of runway; Attridge survived 2 1 12/14/18 Effects of Air Compressibility on Flight Stability 3 Implications of Air Compressibility for Stability and Control • Early difficulties with compressibility – Encountered in high-speed dives from high altitude, e.g., Lockheed P-38 Lightning • Thick wing center section – Developed compressibility burble, reducing lift-curve slope and downwash • Reduced downwash – Increased horizontal stabilizer effectiveness – Increased static stability – Introduced
    [Show full text]
  • O N Viscous, Inviscid and Centrifugal Instability M
    On viscous, inviscid and centrifugal instability mechanisms in compressible boundary layers, including non-linear vortex/wave interaction and the effects of large Mach number on transition. Submitted to the University of London as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Nicholas Derick Blackaby, University College. March 1991. 1 ProQuest Number: 10609861 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a com plete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest ProQuest 10609861 Published by ProQuest LLC(2017). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States C ode Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106- 1346 A b stract The stability and transition of a compressible boundary layer, on a flat or curved surface, is considered using rational asymptotic theories based on the large size of the Reynolds numbers of concern. The Mach number is also treated as a large parameter with regard to hypersonic flow. The resulting equations are simpler than, but consistent with, the full Navier Stokes equations, but numer­ ical computations are still required. This approach also has the advantage that particular possible mechanisms for instability and/or transition can be studied, in isolation or in combination, allowing understanding of the underlying physics responsible for the breakdown of a laminar boundary layer.
    [Show full text]
  • 7. Transonic Aerodynamics of Airfoils and Wings
    W.H. Mason 7. Transonic Aerodynamics of Airfoils and Wings 7.1 Introduction Transonic flow occurs when there is mixed sub- and supersonic local flow in the same flowfield (typically with freestream Mach numbers from M = 0.6 or 0.7 to 1.2). Usually the supersonic region of the flow is terminated by a shock wave, allowing the flow to slow down to subsonic speeds. This complicates both computations and wind tunnel testing. It also means that there is very little analytic theory available for guidance in designing for transonic flow conditions. Importantly, not only is the outer inviscid portion of the flow governed by nonlinear flow equations, but the nonlinear flow features typically require that viscous effects be included immediately in the flowfield analysis for accurate design and analysis work. Note also that hypersonic vehicles with bow shocks necessarily have a region of subsonic flow behind the shock, so there is an element of transonic flow on those vehicles too. In the days of propeller airplanes the transonic flow limitations on the propeller mostly kept airplanes from flying fast enough to encounter transonic flow over the rest of the airplane. Here the propeller was moving much faster than the airplane, and adverse transonic aerodynamic problems appeared on the prop first, limiting the speed and thus transonic flow problems over the rest of the aircraft. However, WWII fighters could reach transonic speeds in a dive, and major problems often arose. One notable example was the Lockheed P-38 Lightning. Transonic effects prevented the airplane from readily recovering from dives, and during one flight test, Lockheed test pilot Ralph Virden had a fatal accident.
    [Show full text]
  • Pub Date Abstract
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 058 456 VT 014 597 TITLE Exploring in Aeronautics. An Introductionto Aeronautical Sciences. INSTITUTION National Aeronautics and SpaceAdministration, Cleveland, Ohio. Lewis Research Center. REPORT NO NASA-EP-89 PUB DATE 71 NOTE 398p. AVAILABLE FROMSuperintendent of Documents, U.S. GovernmettPrinting Office, Washington, D.C. 20402 (Stock No.3300-0395; NAS1.19;89, $3.50) EDRS PRICE MF-$0.65 HC-$13.16 DESCRIPTORS Aerospace Industry; *AerospaceTechnology; *Curriculum Guides; Illustrations;*Industrial Education; Instructional Materials;*Occupational Guidance; *Textbooks IDENTIFIERS *Aeronatics ABSTRACT This curriculum guide is based on a year oflectures and projects of a contemporary special-interestExplorer program intended to provide career guidance and motivationfor promising students interested in aerospace engineering and scientific professions. The adult-oriented program avoidstechnicality and rigorous mathematics and stresses real life involvementthrough project activity and teamwork. Teachers in high schoolsand colleges will find this a useful curriculum resource, w!th manytopics in various disciplines which can supplement regular courses.Curriculum committees, textbook writers and hobbyists will also findit relevant. The materials may be used at college level forintroductory courses, or modified for use withvocationally oriented high school student groups. Seventeen chapters are supplementedwith photographs, charts, and line drawings. A related document isavailable as VT 014 596. (CD) SCOPE OF INTEREST NOTICE The ERIC Facility has assigned this document for processing to tri In our judgement, thisdocument is also of interest to the clearing- houses noted to the right. Index- ing should reflect their special points of view. 4.* EXPLORING IN AERONAUTICS an introduction to Aeronautical Sciencesdeveloped at the NASA Lewis Research Center, Cleveland, Ohio.
    [Show full text]
  • Potential Equations and Pressure Coefficient For
    International Journal of Theoretical & Applied Sciences, 9(1): 35-42(2017) ISSN No. (Print): 0975-1718 ISSN No. (Online): 2249-3247 Potential Equations and Pressure Coefficient for Compressible Flow: Comparison between Compressible and Incompressible Flow in Aerodynamics Menka Yadav * and Santosh Kumar Yadav ** *Research Scholar, J.J.T. University. Rajasthan, India ** Director (A&R), J.J.T. University, Rajasthan, India (Corresponding author: (Corresponding author: Menka Yadav) (Received 02 March, 2017 accepted 05 April, 2017) (Published by Research Trend, Website: www.researchtrend.net) ABSTRACT: We derive the potential equation for slender bodies and seek to understand the flow field equations for subsonic, supersonic and transonic flow in framework of small perturbation. Large amount of heat and mass can be transferred in a efficient way between the surface and fluid when flow is released against the surface. When aircraft passes through several distinct regions, the flow develops a velocity and pressure profile. In stagnation-region large scale turbulent flow affects transfer coefficient. At the face of object total pressure is higher than behind the object. Profile slopes shows that compressible and incompressible flows are related via certain equations. Zero Mach number incompressible medium causes pressure disturbances to move uniformly in all directions. Flow of heat and mass transfer is strongly affected by the geometry of the device. Keywords: Mach number, Pressure drag, Shock wave, Slender bodies, Velocity profile. I. INTRODUCTION called lift, which acts on the wing. Velocity varies along the wing chord and in the direction normal to its surface. Flow having significant changes in fluid density are The region adjacent to the wall, where the velocity known as compressible flow or flow with Mach number increases from zero to freestream value is known as the greater than 0.3 is treated as compressible.
    [Show full text]
  • Eberhard Schneider, Klaus Thoma the ERNST-MACH-INSTITUT: PRESENT FIELDS of RESEARCH CONTINUATION of MACH’S SHOCK WAVE INVESTIGATIONS
    Eberhard Schneider, Klaus Thoma THE ERNST-MACH-INSTITUT: PRESENT FIELDS OF RESEARCH CONTINUATION OF MACH’S SHOCK WAVE INVESTIGATIONS The present research program of the Ernst-Mach-Institut is presented. The Institute is one of 58 institutes of the Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft, all of which are working in fields of applied research. It was founded in 1959 by Hubert Schardin, a famous physicist working in fluid dynamics and ballistics. The institute’s name was chosen in honour of the great achievements and merits in physics of Ernst Mach, especially in the fields of shock waves in air and high speed photography. It is presented how these topics have been further investigated for many years. Shock wave studies have also been extended for solid materials by means of special acceleration techniques. The main tools for this purpose are a variety of light gas guns - their operation principle is explained - forming a unique research facility in Europe. Respective masses of milligrams up to many kilograms can be accelerated from m/s up to 10 km/s. The main applications for this technology are the following: Experimental space debris simulation for spacecraft protection; Simulation of natural high-speed impact phenomena; Ballistic missile defence tests; Terminal ballistic research. Other fields of work at the institute are the following: Dynamic material testing at very high deformation rates; Detonics; Development of high-speed visualization and testing equipment; Development of numerical simulation methods and material models; Security research. A fundamental working principle of the institute is doing both numerical and experimental studies in combination, whenever possible. SCHNEIDER, Eberhard a Klaus THOMA.
    [Show full text]
  • 200811-2008 Learjet 60XR.Pdf
    I I Leariet 60XR• TURBINEPI LOT The 60XR's Pro Line 21 suite has electronic charts and can portray flight plan routes in 3-D (second screen from right). Autopilot controls are on the glareshield panel, with warning annunciators immediately above them. Subpanel switches and controls are cleanly grouped by function, and well-organized. Learjet 60XR Average equipped price: $13.65 million Specifications Performance Powerplants Two Pratt & Whitney Takeoff distance 5,450 ft PW305A. 4.600 Ibst ea Climb to FL410 18.5 min Recommended TBO 6,000 hr High speed cruise .466 KTASjMach 0.81 Length 58 ft 8 in Typical cruise speed .. 453 KTASjMach 0.79 works out to 0.391 pounds of thrust for Height 14 ft 6 in Long range speed 426 KTASjMach 0.74 each pound of weight. (The original Wingspan 43 ft 9 in Max range 2,451 nm Lear Jet 23 had a 1:2.2 thrust-to-weight Wing area 264.5 sq ft Max operating altitude 51.000 ft ratio; Concorde had a 0.373 thrust-to• Wing loading 88.8 Ibjsq ft Single-engine service ceiling 24.300 ft weight ratio.) This kind of thrust is what Power loading 2.55 Ibjlb Sea-level cabin to 25.700 ft gives all Learjets their breathtaking Seats 2 + up to 8 Landing distance 3,420 ft acceleration and climb performance, Cabin length 17 ft 7 in which we'll see shortly. Cabin width 5 ft 11 in For more information. contact Bombardier Like so many other new business Cabin height 5 ft 8 in Aerospace.
    [Show full text]
  • Ac 61-107B Chg 1
    U.S. Department Advisory of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Circular Subject: Aircraft Operations at Altitudes Date: 9/9/15 AC No: 61-107B Above 25,000 Feet Mean Sea Level Initiated by: AFS-800 Change: 1 or Mach Numbers Greater Than .75 1. PURPOSE. This advisory circular (AC) alerts pilots transitioning from aircraft with less performance capability to complex, high-performance aircraft that are capable of operating at high altitudes and high airspeeds. In particular, this AC stresses special physiological, equipment, and aerodynamic considerations involved in these kinds of operations. It also provides information to aid pilots in becoming familiar with the basic phenomena associated with high-altitude and high-speed flight. 2. PRINCIPAL CHANGES. Individual variability in hypoxia tolerance was the basis of discussions between the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) Chief Medical Officer and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) about whether to continue to include information in this AC relating to time of useful consciousness (TUC) (a measure of hypoxia tolerance) with increasing operational altitudes. TUCs are based on data that represent average values and reflect wide variation among pilots in terms of time to incapacitation. There was concern that this table was misleading because of the considerable ranges in TUCs given. Rather than delete the table from the AC, we agreed to augment it with more specific information on why hypoxia tolerances vary among individuals. This is in the form of a CAUTION statement presented underneath the original table. This change also incorporates editorial corrections throughout the document. PAGE CONTROL CHART Remove Pages Dated Insert Pages Dated Page ii 3/29/13 Page ii 9/9/15 Pages 1 thru 3 3/29/13 Pages 1 thru 3 9/9/15 Page 8 3/29/13 Page 8 9/9/15 Page 10 3/29/13 Page 10 9/9/15 Page 24 3/29/13 Page 24 9/9/15 Page 31 3/29/13 Page 31 9/9/15 Page 34 3/29/13 Page 34 9/9/15 Pages 40 thru 45 3/29/13 Pages 40 thru 45 9/9/15 John S.
    [Show full text]
  • Operations Circular 3 of 2011
    GOVERNMENT OF INDIA CIVIL AVIATION DEPARTMENT OFFICE OF DIRECTOR GENERAL OF CIVIL AVIATION NEW DELHI OPERATIONS CIRCULAR 3 OF 2011 AV. 22024/8/2010-FSD 21st April 2011 Subject: OPERATIONS OF AIRCRAFT AT ALTITUDES ABOVE 25,000 FEET MSL AND/OR MACH NUMBERS (MMO) GREATER THAN .75 1. PURPOSE. This circular is issued to guide pilots, particularly those who are transitioning from aircraft of lower performance capability to complex, high-performance aircraft that are capable of operating at high altitudes and high airspeeds. It is essential to have knowledge of the special physiological, engine and aerodynamic considerations involved in these operations. 2. BACKGROUND. A series of safety recommendations have required that, among other things, a minimum training curriculum be established for use at pilot schools covering pilots initial transition onto general aviation turbojet airplanes. Aerodynamics and physiological aspects of high-performance aircraft operating at high altitudes were among the subjects recommended for inclusion in this training curriculum. These recommendations were the result of a review of a series of fatal accidents which were believed to involve a lack of flightcrew knowledge and proficiency in general aviation turbojet airplanes capable of operating in a high-altitude environment. Although the near total destruction of physical evidence and the absence of installed flight recorders had prevented authorities to accurately determine the circumstances which led to these accidents, the concern that a lack of flightcrew knowledge and proficiency in the subject matter of this circular was involved in either the initial loss of control or the inability to regain control of the aircraft, or both.
    [Show full text]
  • Ac 61-107A - Operations of Aircraft at Altitudes Above 25,000 Feet Msl And/Or Mach Numbers (Mmo) Greater Than .75
    AC 61-107A - OPERATIONS OF AIRCRAFT AT ALTITUDES ABOVE 25,000 FEET MSL AND/OR MACH NUMBERS (MMO) GREATER THAN .75 {New-2003-09} Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration 1/2/03 Initiated by: AFS-820 1. PURPOSE. This advisory circular (AC) is issued to alert pilots who are transitioning from aircraft with less performance capability to complex, high-performance aircraft that are capable of operating at high altitudes and high airspeeds, of the need to be knowledgeable about the special physiological and aerodynamic considerations involved in these kinds of operations. 2. CANCELLATION. AC 61-107, Operations of Aircraft at Altitudes Above 25,000 Feet MSL and/or Mach Numbers (Mmo) Greater Than .75, dated January 23, 1991, is cancelled. 3. DEFINITIONS. a. Aspect Ratio is the relationship between the wing chord and the wingspan. A short wingspan and wide wing chord equal a low aspect ratio. b. Aileron buzz is a very rapid oscillation of an aileron, at certain critical air speeds of some aircraft, which does not usually reach large magnitudes nor become dangerous. It is often caused by shock- induced separation of the boundary layer. c. Drag Divergence is a phenomenon that occurs when an airfoil's drag increases sharply and requires substantial increases in power (thrust) to produce further increases in speed. This is not to be confused with MACH crit. The drag increase is due to the unstable formation of shock waves that transform a large amount of energy into heat and into pressure pulses that act to consume a major portion of the available propulsive energy.
    [Show full text]
  • Interaction Between a Conical Shock Wave and a Plane Compressible Turbulent Boundary Layer at Mach 2.05
    INTERACTION BETWEEN A CONICAL SHOCK WAVE AND A PLANE COMPRESSIBLE TURBULENT BOUNDARY LAYER AT MACH 2.05 BY JASON T. HALE THESIS Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Aerospace Engineering in the Graduate College of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2014 Urbana, Illinois Advisers: Professor Gregory Elliott Professor J. Craig Dutton ABSTRACT The interaction between an impinging conical shock wave with a plane compressible turbulent boundary layer has been studied at Mach 2.05. Surface oil flow and pressure-sensitive paint (PSP) data were obtained beneath the oncoming boundary layer, while schlieren and particle image velocimetry (PIV) data were obtained in the streamwise/wall-normal (x-y) plane. Oil flow data suggested that the interaction causes two-dimensional (2D) separation near the centerline, and outside of this region three-dimensional (3D) separation that propagates fluid away from the centerline toward the sidewall. PSP results showed relatively constant upstream-influence length across the inviscid shock trace. PSP also revealed significant spanwise and streamwise expansion just downstream of the shock trace, unlike the qualitatively similar two-dimensional, wedge-generated oblique shock/boundary-layer interaction. Schlieren data suggested that the flow through the interaction was unseparated, and that there is significant unsteadiness in interaction position away from the centerline due to variation in the incoming boundary layer. PIV data showed the convection of large-scale vortical structures at velocities on the order of the streamwise velocity at the vortex center. These structures were smoothed out in the interaction. The PIV data moreover confirmed the downstream expansion shown by the PSP as well as a mean lack of flow separation.
    [Show full text]
  • Ntsb/Aar-82-04
    .. PB82-910404 AIRCRAFT ACCIDENT REPORT .SKY TRAIN AIR, INC. GATES LEARJET 24, N44CJ FELT, OKLAHOMA OCTOBER 1, 1981 2' 1 NTSB-AAR-82-4 0, I UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT TECHNICAL REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE . Report No. 2.Government Accession No. 3.Recipient's Catalog No. NTSB-AAR-82-4 PB82-910404 . Tit le and Subtitle Aviation Accident Report--Sky 5.Report Date Train Air, Inc., Gates Learjet 24, N44CJ, Felt, May 18,1982 Oklahoma, October 1, 1981. 6.Performing- Organization- Code , . Author(s) 8.Performing Organization ~ Report No. 88 National Transportation Safety Board 3435A Bureau of Accident Investigation 11.Contract or Grant No. Washington, D.C. 20594 13.Type of Report and Period Covered 2.Sponsoring Agency Name and Address Aircraft Accident Report October, 1, 1981 NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD - Washington, 0. C. 20594 14.Sponsoring Agency Code 5.Supplcmentrry Notes l6.AbstractAbout 1502 c.d.t., on October 1, 1981, a Sky Train Air, Inc., Learjet 24, N44CJ, crashed 2.5 miles southwest of Felt, Oklahoma. The flightcrew and one passenger, the only occupants on board, were killed. At 1449:39, while in cruise flight at Flight Level 450, en route to McAllen, Texas, from Casper, Wyoming, the flightcrew made initial contact with the Albuquerque Air Route Traffic Control Center. About 1 minute later, the flightcrew failed to respond to a frequency change instruction and the aircraft's transponder beacon code was lost. The controller made several attempts to contact the aircraft but to no avail. Witnesses at Felt heard an aircraft overhead at a very high speed; one witness who saw the aircraft momentarily, stated it was in I a descent angle of about 45'before it struck the ground.
    [Show full text]