Ecological Role of Dry-Habitat Chimpanzees (Pan Troglodytes Schweinfurthii)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ecological Role of Dry-Habitat Chimpanzees (Pan Troglodytes Schweinfurthii) Ecological Role of Dry-Habitat Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii) at Issa, Ugalla, Tanzania by Samantha M. Russak A Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy Approved April 2013 by the Graduate Supervisory Committee: Kaye Reed, Chair Gary Schwartz Leanne Nash ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY May 2013 ABSTRACT Identifying the ecological role, or niche, that a species occupies within their larger community elucidates environmental adaptability and evolutionary success. This dissertation investigates the occupied niche of chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii) living in an open, dry savanna-woodland environment by examining patterns of resource use and interspecific interactions. Data were collected October 2010—November 2011 at Issa, in the Ugalla region of western Tanzania, which is one of the driest, most open, and seasonal habitats inhabited by chimpanzees. Unlike most primatological studies which employ methods that include focal follows, this study focused instead on observing ‘resource patches’ for chimpanzees. Patch focals allow for the observation of all animals within a study area; capture resources that are not used by the study species; and are particularly well suited for unhabituated communities. In order to better understand relationships between environment and behavior, data collected at Issa are compared with published data from other chimpanzee populations. Issa chimpanzees were expected to have broader resource use than forest chimpanzees, as well as increased competition with other fauna, due to fewer available resources. However, in contrast to the assumption of food scarcity in dry habitats, dietary resources were available throughout the year. Like other populations, the diet of Issa chimpanzees consisted of mostly fruit, but unlike at other sites, the majority of plants consumed were woodland species. Additionally, although chimpanzees and other fauna i shared spatial and dietary resources, there was only nominal overlap. These results point to extremely low levels of indirect competition between chimpanzees and other fauna. Despite extensive study of forest chimpanzees, little is known about their role within their faunal community in open, dry habitats, nor about how greater seasonality affects resource use. This project addresses both of these important issues and fosters novel approaches in anthropological studies, especially in reference to chimpanzee ecology and evolution. Understanding current chimpanzee behavioral relationships with their environments shapes hypotheses about their pasts, and also informs predictions about behaviors of similar taxa in paleo-environments. Lastly, examining the ecological role of chimpanzees within their larger communities will influence the formation of, as well as evaluate, conservation strategies. ii For my mother, who never stopped encouraging me to ask questions, and who wholeheartedly supports all of my scientific endeavors, no matter how far from home they may take me iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost, I would like to thank my advisory committee Kaye Reed, Leanne Nash, and Gary Schwartz for their patience, support, and guidance throughout my entire graduate career. I am especially grateful to my chair, Kaye Reed, for the immediate responses to late night emails, long-distance support while either one or both of us were in the field, and for helping keep my mother sane while I spent a year in Africa. I would also like to express my deepest gratitude to my undergraduate advisors, Bill McGrew and Linda Marchant, who steered me towards the exciting field of primatology, and who continue to be inspirational mentors and colleagues. My dissertation research would not have been possible without the help and support of the amazing IHO and SHESC staff here at ASU, including Lindsay Mullen, Julie Russ, Chelle Brookes, Philomena Bell, Tae O’Connor, and Georgianna Miller. Funding was generously provided by IHO, GPSA, ASU Graduate College, SHESC, and a NSF Graduate Research Fellowship (DGE-0802261). Many thanks also go to the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology for supplying camera traps. My research would not have been possible without the permission of TAWIRI or COSTECH (permit # 2010-323-NA-2010-59). For allowing me to conduct research at their study site, I am deeply indebted to the Ugalla Primate Project. Alex Piel and Fiona Stewart, in particular, have been invaluable collaborators and I look forward to continuing to work with them. My sincerest gratitude goes to my field assistants Shedrack Lucas, Busoti Juma, Msigwa Rashid, Ndai Samwely, Joffrey Lucas, and Mlela Juma; I could not have asked for a better team of assistants, who never once complained iv about their unappealing tasks of “watching trees” and collecting fecal samples. Many thanks also go to Caspian Johnson for providing levity during stressful times and for being another English-speaking person with whom I could converse. For providing logistical help and guidance while in Tanzania, I thank the staff at the Jane Goodall Institute, including Shadrack Kamenya, Mary Mavanza, and Emmanuel Mtiti. A special thanks goes to Dr. Anthony Collins who introduced me to the wonderful people of Kigoma and Ujiji, to the chimpanzees of Gombe, and to my childhood inspiration Dr. Jane Goodall. My trips to Kigoma would not have been the same without the friendship of John Kerkering, who also gave me much-needed GIS help, and Mr. Salim, who supplied me with much-needed chocolate candy bars. I am forever appreciative for the advice, support, and commiseration of my fellow graduate students, particularly Stephanie Meredith, Kristi Lewton, Thierra Nalley, Terry Ritzman, Teague O’Mara, Laura Bidner, Jeremiah Scott, Lynn Lucas, Amy Shapiro, and my “best officemate” Laura Stroik. I cannot thank Jess Libman and the rest of the Libmans enough for adopting me into their family and making sure that I had a life outside of graduate school. Much love and gratitude also go to my brothers, aunts, cousin, and grandparents on the East coast for their long-distance support and encouragement. Last, but not least, I cannot express how grateful I am for my parents, who always gave me opportunities “to do science” and feed my intellectual curiosity. But most of all, I feel extremely privileged and loved to have parents who are constantly encouraging me to be independent and pursue my dreams, even when those dreams mean sending their only daughter to the remote jungles of Central America and Africa. v TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................................xii LIST OF FIGURES.............................................................................................................. xiv CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................... 1 2 BACKGROUND................................................................................................ 5 Community Ecology....................................................................................... 5 Some important ecological factors ................................................................. 6 Habitats ...................................................................................................... 6 Resource Distribution ................................................................................ 9 Temporal distribution ........................................................................... 9 Spatial distribution.............................................................................. 11 What is a Community? ................................................................................. 12 Open and Closed Communities............................................................... 12 Community Features................................................................................ 13 Species diversity and richness ............................................................ 13 Measures of diversity and richness..................................................... 14 General patterns of diversity and richness ......................................... 15 Interspecific Interactions ......................................................................... 16 Neutralism........................................................................................... 17 Mutualism/Cooperation/Commensalism............................................ 18 vi CHAPTER Page Predation ............................................................................................. 19 Competition......................................................................................... 20 Coexistence of Species ................................................................................. 23 Competitive Exclusion Principle............................................................. 23 Niches and Ecological Roles ................................................................... 24 Fundamental versus realized niche..................................................... 24 Ecological role .................................................................................... 25 Niche Overlap .......................................................................................... 25 Niche Differentiation ............................................................................... 27 Summary of Community Ecology...............................................................
Recommended publications
  • EAZA Best Practice Guidelines Bonobo (Pan Paniscus)
    EAZA Best Practice Guidelines Bonobo (Pan paniscus) Editors: Dr Jeroen Stevens Contact information: Royal Zoological Society of Antwerp – K. Astridplein 26 – B 2018 Antwerp, Belgium Email: [email protected] Name of TAG: Great Ape TAG TAG Chair: Dr. María Teresa Abelló Poveda – Barcelona Zoo [email protected] Edition: First edition - 2020 1 2 EAZA Best Practice Guidelines disclaimer Copyright (February 2020) by EAZA Executive Office, Amsterdam. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced in hard copy, machine-readable or other forms without advance written permission from the European Association of Zoos and Aquaria (EAZA). Members of the European Association of Zoos and Aquaria (EAZA) may copy this information for their own use as needed. The information contained in these EAZA Best Practice Guidelines has been obtained from numerous sources believed to be reliable. EAZA and the EAZA APE TAG make a diligent effort to provide a complete and accurate representation of the data in its reports, publications, and services. However, EAZA does not guarantee the accuracy, adequacy, or completeness of any information. EAZA disclaims all liability for errors or omissions that may exist and shall not be liable for any incidental, consequential, or other damages (whether resulting from negligence or otherwise) including, without limitation, exemplary damages or lost profits arising out of or in connection with the use of this publication. Because the technical information provided in the EAZA Best Practice Guidelines can easily be misread or misinterpreted unless properly analysed, EAZA strongly recommends that users of this information consult with the editors in all matters related to data analysis and interpretation.
    [Show full text]
  • Freshwater Fishes
    WESTERN CAPE PROVINCE state oF BIODIVERSITY 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1 Introduction 2 Chapter 2 Methods 17 Chapter 3 Freshwater fishes 18 Chapter 4 Amphibians 36 Chapter 5 Reptiles 55 Chapter 6 Mammals 75 Chapter 7 Avifauna 89 Chapter 8 Flora & Vegetation 112 Chapter 9 Land and Protected Areas 139 Chapter 10 Status of River Health 159 Cover page photographs by Andrew Turner (CapeNature), Roger Bills (SAIAB) & Wicus Leeuwner. ISBN 978-0-620-39289-1 SCIENTIFIC SERVICES 2 Western Cape Province State of Biodiversity 2007 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION Andrew Turner [email protected] 1 “We live at a historic moment, a time in which the world’s biological diversity is being rapidly destroyed. The present geological period has more species than any other, yet the current rate of extinction of species is greater now than at any time in the past. Ecosystems and communities are being degraded and destroyed, and species are being driven to extinction. The species that persist are losing genetic variation as the number of individuals in populations shrinks, unique populations and subspecies are destroyed, and remaining populations become increasingly isolated from one another. The cause of this loss of biological diversity at all levels is the range of human activity that alters and destroys natural habitats to suit human needs.” (Primack, 2002). CapeNature launched its State of Biodiversity Programme (SoBP) to assess and monitor the state of biodiversity in the Western Cape in 1999. This programme delivered its first report in 2002 and these reports are updated every five years. The current report (2007) reports on the changes to the state of vertebrate biodiversity and land under conservation usage.
    [Show full text]
  • Ornithological Expedition to Southern Bénin, April 2011
    Ornithological expedition to southern Bénin, April 2011 Françoise Dowsett-Lemaire & Robert J. Dowsett Dowsett-Lemaire Misc. Report 80 (2011) Dowsett-Lemaire F. & Dowsett R.J. 2011. Ornithological expedition to southern Bénin, April 2011. Dowsett-Lemaire Miscellaneous Report 80: 16pp. Birds of southern Bénin -1- Dowsett-Lemaire Misc. Rep. 80 (2011) Ornithological expedition to southern Bénin, April 2011 by Françoise Dowsett-Lemaire & Robert J. Dowsett Résumé Ceci est notre deuxième visite au sud du Bénin, faisant suite à une première expédition pendant la saison sèche de 2009. Le mois d’avril 2011 a été partagé entre les forêts principales du sud (Lama, Niaouli), les forêts plus sèches ou forêts claires des Monts Kouffé et Tobé à l’ouest, les plaines marécageuses du Zou et du Sô, et la zone côtière (Pahou et Grand-Popo). Un séjour du 12 au 16 avril à la limite sud des Monts Kouffé et dans la zone protégée de Tobé (Bantè) a permis d’étendre l’aire de distribution de plusieurs espèces forestières ou de sa - vane, notamment du rare Aigle couronné Stephanoaetus coronatus (un ex. essayant de capturer un Daman des rochers sur le rocher de Tobé), du Râle perlé Sarothrura pulchra (un chanteur à Tobé, limite nord actuelle), de l’Oedicnème tachard Burhinus capensis (Tobé, limite sud actuelle), Malcoha à bec jaune Ceuthmochares aereus (Tobé & Kouffé, limite nord), Coucal à ventre blanc Centropus leucogaster (Tobé & Kouffé, limite nord), Grand-duc de Verreaux Bubo lacteus (Kouffé), Trogon narina Apaloderma narina (Kouffé), Calao rieur By - canistes
    [Show full text]
  • RIS) Categories Approved by Recommendation 4.7, As Amended by Resolution VIII.13 of the Conference of the Contracting Parties
    Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands (RIS) Categories approved by Recommendation 4.7, as amended by Resolution VIII.13 of the Conference of the Contracting Parties. Note for compilers: 1. The RIS should be completed in accordance with the attached Explanatory Notes and Guidelines for completing the Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands. Compilers are strongly advised to read this guidance before filling in the RIS. 2. Once completed, the RIS (and accompanying map(s)) should be submitted to the Ramsar Bureau. Compilers are strongly urged to provide an electronic (MS Word) copy of the RIS and, where possible, digital copies of maps. 1. Name and address of the compiler of this form: FOR OFFICE USE ONLY. DD MM YY Ralph A. Woods Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 4th Street Sinkor Designation date Site Reference Number Monrovia, Liberia Cell # 02317-7035466 Email: [email protected] 2. Date this sheet was completed/updated: Tuesday April 18, 2006 3. Country: Liberia 4. Name of the Ramsar site: Gbedin Wetlands 5. Designation of new Ramsar site: This RIS is for (tick one box only ) a). Designation of a new Ramsar Site ; or b). Updated information on an existing Ramsar site □ 6. For RIS updates only, changes to the site since its designation or earlier update: a) Site boundary and area The Ramsar site boundary and area are unchanged: □ or If the site boundary has changed: i) the boundary has been delineated more accurately □; or ii) the area has been extended □; or iii) the area has been reduced** □ ** Important note: If the boundary and / or area of a designated site is being restricted/ reduced, the contracting party should have following the procedures established by the Conference of the Parties in the Annex of the COP9 resolution IX.6 and provided a report in line with paragraph 28 of that Annex, prior to the submission of an updated RIS.
    [Show full text]
  • The Birds (Aves) of Oromia, Ethiopia – an Annotated Checklist
    European Journal of Taxonomy 306: 1–69 ISSN 2118-9773 https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2017.306 www.europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu 2017 · Gedeon K. et al. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Monograph urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:A32EAE51-9051-458A-81DD-8EA921901CDC The birds (Aves) of Oromia, Ethiopia – an annotated checklist Kai GEDEON 1,*, Chemere ZEWDIE 2 & Till TÖPFER 3 1 Saxon Ornithologists’ Society, P.O. Box 1129, 09331 Hohenstein-Ernstthal, Germany. 2 Oromia Forest and Wildlife Enterprise, P.O. Box 1075, Debre Zeit, Ethiopia. 3 Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig, Centre for Taxonomy and Evolutionary Research, Adenauerallee 160, 53113 Bonn, Germany. * Corresponding author: [email protected] 2 Email: [email protected] 3 Email: [email protected] 1 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:F46B3F50-41E2-4629-9951-778F69A5BBA2 2 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:F59FEDB3-627A-4D52-A6CB-4F26846C0FC5 3 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:A87BE9B4-8FC6-4E11-8DB4-BDBB3CFBBEAA Abstract. Oromia is the largest National Regional State of Ethiopia. Here we present the first comprehensive checklist of its birds. A total of 804 bird species has been recorded, 601 of them confirmed (443) or assumed (158) to be breeding birds. At least 561 are all-year residents (and 31 more potentially so), at least 73 are Afrotropical migrants and visitors (and 44 more potentially so), and 184 are Palaearctic migrants and visitors (and eight more potentially so). Three species are endemic to Oromia, 18 to Ethiopia and 43 to the Horn of Africa. 170 Oromia bird species are biome restricted: 57 to the Afrotropical Highlands biome, 95 to the Somali-Masai biome, and 18 to the Sudan-Guinea Savanna biome.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded from Brill.Com09/27/2021 09:14:05PM Via Free Access 218 Rode-Margono & Nekaris – Impact of Climate and Moonlight on Javan Slow Lorises
    Contributions to Zoology, 83 (4) 217-225 (2014) Impact of climate and moonlight on a venomous mammal, the Javan slow loris (Nycticebus javanicus Geoffroy, 1812) Eva Johanna Rode-Margono1, K. Anne-Isola Nekaris1, 2 1 Oxford Brookes University, Gipsy Lane, Headington, Oxford OX3 0BP, UK 2 E-mail: [email protected] Keywords: activity, environmental factors, humidity, lunarphobia, moon, predation, temperature Abstract Introduction Predation pressure, food availability, and activity may be af- To secure maintenance, survival and reproduction, fected by level of moonlight and climatic conditions. While many animals adapt their behaviour to various factors, such nocturnal mammals reduce activity at high lunar illumination to avoid predators (lunarphobia), most visually-oriented nocturnal as climate, availability of resources, competition, preda- primates and birds increase activity in bright nights (lunarphilia) tion, luminosity, habitat fragmentation, and anthropo- to improve foraging efficiency. Similarly, weather conditions may genic disturbance (Kappeler and Erkert, 2003; Beier influence activity level and foraging ability. We examined the 2006; Donati and Borgognini-Tarli, 2006). According response of Javan slow lorises (Nycticebus javanicus Geoffroy, to optimal foraging theory, animal behaviour can be seen 1812) to moonlight and temperature. We radio-tracked 12 animals as a trade-off between the risk of being preyed upon in West Java, Indonesia, over 1.5 years, resulting in over 600 hours direct observations. We collected behavioural and environmen- and the fitness gained from foraging (Charnov, 1976). tal data including lunar illumination, number of human observ- Perceived predation risk assessed through indirect cues ers, and climatic factors, and 185 camera trap nights on potential that correlate with the probability of encountering a predators.
    [Show full text]
  • South Africa: Magoebaskloof and Kruger National Park Custom Tour Trip Report
    SOUTH AFRICA: MAGOEBASKLOOF AND KRUGER NATIONAL PARK CUSTOM TOUR TRIP REPORT 24 February – 2 March 2019 By Jason Boyce This Verreaux’s Eagle-Owl showed nicely one late afternoon, puffing up his throat and neck when calling www.birdingecotours.com [email protected] 2 | TRIP REPORT South Africa: Magoebaskloof and Kruger National Park February 2019 Overview It’s common knowledge that South Africa has very much to offer as a birding destination, and the memory of this trip echoes those sentiments. With an itinerary set in one of South Africa’s premier birding provinces, the Limpopo Province, we were getting ready for a birding extravaganza. The forests of Magoebaskloof would be our first stop, spending a day and a half in the area and targeting forest special after forest special as well as tricky range-restricted species such as Short-clawed Lark and Gurney’s Sugarbird. Afterwards we would descend the eastern escarpment and head into Kruger National Park, where we would make our way to the northern sections. These included Punda Maria, Pafuri, and the Makuleke Concession – a mouthwatering birding itinerary that was sure to deliver. A pair of Woodland Kingfishers in the fever tree forest along the Limpopo River Detailed Report Day 1, 24th February 2019 – Transfer to Magoebaskloof We set out from Johannesburg after breakfast on a clear Sunday morning. The drive to Polokwane took us just over three hours. A number of birds along the way started our trip list; these included Hadada Ibis, Yellow-billed Kite, Southern Black Flycatcher, Village Weaver, and a few brilliant European Bee-eaters.
    [Show full text]
  • Selection of Morphological Traits to Improve Forage Characteristics of Setaria Sphacelata Grown in Florida L
    This article was downloaded by: [200.129.254.1] On: 21 July 2011, At: 07:40 Publisher: Taylor & Francis Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tnza20 Selection of morphological traits to improve forage characteristics of Setaria sphacelata grown in Florida L. Jank a , K. H. Quesenberry b , L. E. Sollenberger b , D. S. Wofford b & P. M. Lyrene c a Embrapa Beef Cattle, CxP.154, MS, Campo Grande, CEP 79002–970, Brazil E-mail: [email protected] b Agronomy Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA c Horticultural Sciences Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA Available online: 22 Feb 2010 To cite this article: L. Jank, K. H. Quesenberry, L. E. Sollenberger, D. S. Wofford & P. M. Lyrene (2007): Selection of morphological traits to improve forage characteristics of Setaria sphacelata grown in Florida, New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research, 50:1, 73-83 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00288230709510284 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Full terms and conditions of use: http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions This article may be used for research, teaching and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, re-distribution, re-selling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents will be complete or accurate or up to date.
    [Show full text]
  • Psaros, Mehiel Speak Exclusively to TNH on St. Nicholas Nicholas Fundraising Efforts Shrine Underway to Church Complete the Church by Theodore Kalmoukos
    Enjoy our Greek American Weddings Annual Special Insert S BRINGING THE NEWS W TO GENERATIONS OF ND E GREEK- AMERICANS The National Herald 2an 2 ni versary N A WEEKLY GREEK-AMERICAN PUBLICATION 1997-2019 VOL. 23, ISSUE 1165 www.thenationalherald.com February 8-14 , 2020 www. ekirikas .com $1.50 Saving St. Psaros, Mehiel Speak Exclusively to TNH on St. Nicholas Nicholas Fundraising efforts Shrine underway to Church complete the church By Theodore Kalmoukos Time for Greek- BOSTON – The construction the St. Nicholas Greek Orthodox Americans to do Church and National Shrine has already resumed according to all we can Dennis Mehiel and Michael Psaros, chairman and vice chair - Commentary man, respectively, of Friends of By Nicholas Gage St. Nicholas, who spoke to The National Herald during an ex - No one has been more dis - clusive and extensive interview. heartened than I have been by They also said that “the net the unfortunate fate of the St. cost” to complete the Church, Nicholas Shrine at Ground Zero, interior and exterior, is $42 mil - which should have been fin - lion, and they spoke about the ished two years ago at half the fundraising efforts that are un - cost of what it will now take to derway. complete it. When we asked if any finan - Everyone who contributed to cial irregularities took place dur - the delays and the ballooning ing the first phase of the project costs – from the incompetent and if so, by whom, Mehiel and managers of the project at the Psaros said “this is the final time Archdiocese to the slew of we will address this subject.
    [Show full text]
  • The Avifauna of Two Woodlands in Southeast Tanzania
    Scopus 25: 2336, December 2005 The avifauna of two woodlands in southeast Tanzania Anders P. Tøttrup, Flemming P. Jensen and Kim D. Christensen In Tanzania Brachystegia or miombo woodland occupies about two-thirds of the country including the central plateau to the north and the south eastern plateau (Lind & Morrison 1974). Along the coast more luxuriant woodlands are found in what White (1983) terms the Zanzibar-Inhambane regional mosaic floristic region. This highly complex vegetation comprises unique types of forest, thicket, woodland, bushland and grassland, interspersed with areas presently under cultivation and fallow (Hawthorne 1993). The coastal woodlands are usually deciduous or semi-deciduous but contain some evergreen species and often merge with coastal thickets, scrub forest and coastal forest (Hawthorne 1993, Vollesen 1994). The avifauna of miombo woodlands has been described for Zambia (e.g. Benson & Irwin 1966) and Zimbabwe (e.g. Vernon 1968, 1984, 1985), while little has been published on the birds of the coastal woodlands. An exception is Stjernstedt (1970) who reported on the birds in lush and dense Brachystegia microphylla vegetation in a sea of miombo in southeast Tanzania. Here we report our observations of birds in two woodlands in coastal southeast Tanzania, one of which harboured miombo trees. We present information on the number of species encountered during the fieldwork, and compare the avifauna of the two sites. We discuss possible causes for the differences observed and provide new information on habitat preferences for some of the species we recorded at these sites. Study sites Field work was carried out in two coastal woodlands in the Lindi Region, southeast Tanzania in September and October 2001.
    [Show full text]
  • Zambia and Zimbabwe 28 Ovember – 6 December 2009
    Zambia and Zimbabwe 28 ovember – 6 December 2009 Guide: Josh Engel A Tropical Birding Custom Tour All photos taken by the guide on this tour. The Smoke that Thunders: looking down one end of the mile-long Victoria Falls. ITRODUCTIO We began this tour by seeing one of Africa’s most beautiful and sought after birds: African Pitta . After that, the rest was just details. But not really, considering we tacked on 260 more birds and loads of great mammals. We saw Zambia’s only endemic bird, Chaplin’s Barbet , as well as a number of miombo and broad-leaf specialties, including Miombo Rock-Thrush, Racket-tailed Roller, Southern Hyliota, Miombo Pied Barbet, Miombo Glossy Starling, Bradfield’s Hornbill, Pennant-winged ightjar, and Three-banded Courser. With the onset of the rainy season just before the tour, the entire area was beautifully green and was inundated with migrants, so we were able to rack up a great list of cuckoos and other migrants, including incredible looks at a male Kurrichane Buttonquail . Yet the Zambezi had not begun to rise, so Rock Pratincole still populated the river’s rocks, African Skimmer its sandbars, and Lesser Jacana and Allen’s Gallinule its grassy margins. Mammals are always a highlight of any Africa tour: this trip’s undoubted star was a leopard , while a very cooperative serval was also superb. Victoria Falls was incredible, as usual. We had no problems in Zimbabwe whatsoever, and our lodge there on the shores of the Zambezi River was absolutely stunning. The weather was perfect throughout the tour, with clouds often keeping the temperature down and occasional rains keeping bird activity high.
    [Show full text]
  • ETHIOPIA: Birding the Roof of Africa; with Southern Extension a Tropical Birding Set Departure
    ETHIOPIA: Birding the Roof of Africa; with Southern Extension A Tropical Birding Set Departure February 7 – March 1, 2010 Guide: Ken Behrens All photos taken by Ken Behrens during this trip ORIENTATION I have chosen to use a different format for this trip report. First, comes a general introduction to Ethiopia. The text of this section is largely drawn from the recently published Birding Ethiopia, authored by Keith Barnes, Christian, Boix and I. For more information on the book, check out http://www.lynxeds.com/product/birding-ethiopia. After the country introduction comes a summary of the highlights of this tour. Next comes a day-by-day itinerary. Finally, there is an annotated bird list and a mammal list. ETHIOPIA INTRODUCTION Many people imagine Ethiopia as a flat, famine- ridden desert, but this is far from the case. Ethiopia is remarkably diverse, and unexpectedly lush. This is the ʻroof of Africaʼ, holding the continentʼs largest and most contiguous mountain ranges, and some of its tallest peaks. Cleaving the mountains is the Great Rift Valley, which is dotted with beautiful lakes. Towards the borders of the country lie stretches of dry scrub that are more like the desert most people imagine. But even in this arid savanna, diversity is high, and the desert explodes into verdure during the rainy season. The diversity of Ethiopiaʼs landscapes supports a parallel diversity of birds and other wildlife, and although birds are the focus of our tour, there is much more to the country. Ethiopia is the only country in Africa that was never systematically colonized, and Rueppell’s Robin-Chat, a bird of the Ethiopian mountains.
    [Show full text]