CHRONOLOGY of the REVOLUTION February 1917-July 1918 Marl( D

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

CHRONOLOGY of the REVOLUTION February 1917-July 1918 Marl( D CHRONOLOGY OF THE REVOLUTION February 1917-July 1918 Marl( D. Steinberg 1917 FEBRUARY 23 (MARCH 8): International Women's Day. Strikes and demonstrations in Petrograd, the capital, growing over the next few days. FEBRUARY 26 (MARCH 11): Tsar Nicholas II orders commander of Petrograd garrison to suppress disorders. FEBRUARY 27 (MARCH 12): FEBRUARY REVOLUTION: Garrison mu- tinies. Formation of Provisional Committee of the Duma by liberals from Constitutional Democratic Party (Kadets), and Petrograd Soviet of Workers' Deputies, headed by Mensheviks and Socialist Revolutionaries (SRs). FEBRUARY 28-MARCH 2 (MARCH 13-15): Political strikes and dem- onstrations spread to Moscow and provincial capitals. Soviets— councils of elected workers' and soldiers' deputies, usually led by activists from socialist parties—form in most Russian cities. MARCH 2 (15): Nicholas II abdicates. Provisional Government composed mainly of Kadet party ministers established after agreement with Petrograd Soviet. MARCH: Provisional Government declares amnesty to political prisoners and exiles; enacts freedom of speech, press, assembly, association, and strikes; ends death penalty; abolishes flogging and exile to Siberia; removes all legal restrictions of rights based on nationality or religion; begins preparations for elections to Constituent Assembly on the basis of universal, secret, direct, and equal suffrage; and promises land reform. CHRONOLOGY OF THE REVOLUTION xxxvii APRIL 3-4 (16-17): Lenin returns to Petrograd from his exile in Switzerland and issues "April Theses," which call for revo- lution against "bourgeois" Provisional Government, political power to the Soviets, an end to the war, nationalization of land and its distribution to peasants, and industry under the control of workers* councils. APRIL 20-21 (MAY 3-4): APRIL DAYS: armed demonstrations by workers and soldiers in the streets of Petrograd and Moscow after leak to the public of a diplomatic note to the Allies from Foreign Minister Pavel Miliukov apparently expressing annexa- tionist war aims. MAY 5 (18): First coalition government: six socialist ministers (Mensheviks and SRs) join Provisional Government. SPRING AND SUMMER: Continuing labor strikes amid inflation and fuel and food shortages; agrarian unrest, including such di- rect violations of gentry property rights as illegal wood cut- ting, theft of seed and tools, and land seizures; strengthening of national independence movements; and growing Bolshevik success in elections to factory committees, soldiers' and sailors' committees, and neighborhood Soviets. JUNE 3-24 (JUNE 16-JuLY 7): First All-Russian Congress of Work- ers' and Soldiers' Deputies elects Central Executive Committee, headed by Mensheviks and SRs. JUNE 16 (29): Russian offensive on Austrian front begins; within days, it becomes a rout. JUNE 18 (31): Street march in Petrograd, organized by Congress of Soviets, is unexpectedly dominated by Bolshevik slogans: "Down with the Ten Capitalist Ministers," "Down with the Offensive," "All Power to the Soviets." JULY 3—5 (16-18): JULY DAYS: mass armed demonstrations in Petrograd, encouraged by the Bolsheviks, demanding "All Power to the Soviets." Bolshevik leaders arrested or go into hiding. JULY 11 (24): Socialist Alexander Kerensky becomes prime minis- ter. Other ministerial changes follow, bringing other moderate socialists into the government. AUGUST 12-15 (25-28): State Conference in Moscow, bringing together representatives from a wide range of civic organiza- xxxviii CHRONOLOGY OF THE REVOLUTION tions and parties (Bolsheviks refuse to participate). Fails to unite society in support of Provisional Government, but reveals widely held sentiments for firm authority and order. AUGUST 26-30 (SEPTEMBER 8-12): Commander-in-Chief of the Russian Army Gen. Lavr Kornilov attempts military putsch. AUGUST 31 (SEPTEMBER 13): Bolsheviks win majority in Petrograd Soviet. SEPTEMBER 5 (18): Bolsheviks win majority in Moscow Soviet. SEPTEMBER 14-22 (SEPTEMBER 27-OcTOBER 5): Democratic State Conference in Petrograd—composed of representatives of urban and rural Soviets, city Dumas, soldiers' committees, trade unions, and other organizations—refuses to support Bolshevik appeals to form a Soviet government. OCTOBER 24-25 (NOVEMBER 6-7): OCTOBER REVOLUTION: Bolshe- vik Military Revolutionary Committee overthrows Provisional Government. OCTOBER 25-26: In protest against Bolshevik seizure of power, Mensheviks and SRs walk out of Second Congress of Soviets, which endorses seizure of power. OCTOBER 26 (NOVEMBER 8): Congress passes Decree on Peace, ap- pealing to belligerents to conclude an immediate peace without annexations or indemnities and promising to publish all secret treaties. OCTOBER 26 (NOVEMBER 8): Congress passes Decree on Land, abol- ishing private ownership of land and use of hired agricultural labor. In conformity with peasant tradition, land is to be distrib- uted among households according to need or available family labor. OCTOBER 26 (NOVEMBER 8): Congress approves formation of an all-Bolshevik government, the Council of People's Commissars (Sotmarfym), headed by Lenin. OCTOBER 27 (NOVEMBER 9): Decree on the Press—first legislative act of Sovnarkom—gives Sovnarkom the power to suspend or shut any publication "inciting to open resistance or disobedi- ence" against the government. Causes dissent among Bolshevik leadership and Left SRs. OCTOBER 31-NovEMBER 2 (NOVEMBER 13-15): Fighting in Moscow ends in Bolshevik victory. NOVEMBER 2 (15): Bolshevik party rejects demands—made by CHRONOLOGY OF THE REVOLUTION xxxix Union of Railroad Employees and supported by several leading Bolsheviks, including Kamenev and Zinov'ev—for a multi- party socialist government. NOVEMBER 2 (15): Declaration of the Rights of the Peoples of Russia promises all nationalities the right to "free self-determi- nation." NOVEMBER 12 (25): Elections to Constituent Assembly begin, as scheduled by Provisional Government. Bolsheviks, who win most cities and garrisons, gain 24 percent of the vote, but are outnumbered by Socialist Revolutionaries with 40 percent. NOVEMBER 14 (27): Decree on Workers' Control gives workers extensive supervisory power in industrial enterprises. NOVEMBER 28 (DECEMBER 11): Constitutional Democratic Party banned and leaders arrested as "enemies of the people." DECEMBER 7 (20): Cheka established to fight "counterrevolution and sabotage." DECEMBER 9-10 (22-23): Agreement on cooperation with Left SRs, who enter Sovnarkom and Cheka collegium. DECEMBER 12 (25): Lenin's Theses on the Constituent Assembly justifies disbanding Assembly. DECEMBER 16 (29): Decree abolishes all ranks and titles in the army, recognizes authority of soldiers' committees and councils, and requires democratic election of officers. LATE DECEMBER: Tsarist generals Mikhail Alekseev and Kornilov establish Volunteer Army to fight against Soviet government. 19188 JANUARY 1 (14): Attempt to assassinate Lenin. JANUARY 5 (18): Constituent Assembly meets in Petrograd. Fifty thousand demonstrate in support, despite ban on demonstra- tions. Dispersed with force, killing between eight and twenty- one people. JANUARY 6 (19): Constituent Assembly disbanded. Some protests. JANUARY 19 (FEBRUARY 1): Patriarch Tikhon anathematizes the Bolsheviks for bringing harm to the church and for "sowing the seeds of hatred, enmity, and fratricidal strife." He calls on believers to defend the church. JANUARY 24 (FEBRUARY 6): Adoption of new calendar, to begin xl CHRONOLOGY OF THE REVOLUTION January 31 (Old Style), in order that Russia "calculate time" in same way as "almost all cultured nations." FEBRUARY 18 (New Style): After unsuccessful peace negotiations, German and Austrian troops resume offensive against Russia. Following rapid success, Germans add new territorial demands to peace terms. MARCH 3: At Brest-Litovsk, Russians agree to peace terms, which Lenin admits are "obscene." Provokes widespread dissent in party and society. EARLY MARCH: Capital moved to Moscow. MARCH: Meetings of factory deputies in Petrograd—organized by Menshevik-led Assembly of Factory Plenipotentiaries—protest worsening economic conditions and Bolshevik rule. MARCH 8: Russian Social Democratic Workers' Party (Bolshevik) renamed Russian Communist Party (Bolshevik). MARCH 9: Allied forces land at Murmansk. MARCH 14: Left SRs quit government in protest against Brest- Litovsk. During April-June, SRs increasingly critical of Bol- shevik policies. APRIL 4: "Left Communists"—based in Moscow party organi- zation and including Nikolai Bukharin—issue manifesto criti- cizing Soviet foreign and economic policies as insufficiently revolutionary and democratic. MAY 13: To end food shortages, declaration of struggle against "greedy kulaks and wealthy peasants," who are accused of hoarding and speculating in grain. MAY 20: Decree creates armed "food supply detachments" to col- lect grain from peasants. MAY 22: Rebellion of Czechoslovak Legion (army of former Czech and Slovak war prisoners trying to return to the front via Vladi- vostok) begins after government attempts to disarm them. MAY-JUNE: Meetings of workers' representatives in Petrograd and Moscow protest economic breakdown and Bolshevik authori- tarianism toward workers and peasants and demand reconven- ing of Constituent Assembly and new elections to Soviets. EARLY JUNE: British troops land at Archangel. JUNE 7-8: Czech Legion takes Samara, after which deputies to Constituent Assembly form an anti-Bolshevik socialist govern- CHRONOLOGY OF THE REVOLUTION xli ment (Committee of Members
Recommended publications
  • Boris Kolonitskii, “'Democracy' in the Political Consciousness of The
    "Democracy" in the Political Consciousness of the February Revolution Author(s): Boris Ivanovich Kolonitskii Source: Slavic Review, Vol. 57, No. 1 (Spring, 1998), pp. 95-106 Published by: Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2502054 . Accessed: 17/09/2013 09:58 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Association for Slavic, East European, and Eurasian Studies is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Slavic Review. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 128.197.27.9 on Tue, 17 Sep 2013 09:58:33 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions "Democracy" in the Political Consciousness of the FebruaryRevolution Boris Ivanovich Kolonitskii Historians of quite diverging orientations have interpreted the Feb- ruary revolution of 1917 in Russia as a "democratic" revolution. Sev- eral generations of Marxists of various stripes (tolk) have called it a "bourgeois-democratic revolution." In the years of perestroika, the contrast between democratic February and Bolshevik October became an important part of the historical argument of the anticommunist movement. The February revolution was regarded as a dramatic, un- successful attempt at the modernization and westernization of Russia, as its democratization.
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of Factors in the Russian Revolutionary
    AN ANALYSIS OF FACTORS IN THE ---- RUSSIAN REVOLUTIONARY MOVEMENT By Rev . Paul OtBrien, S. C. J. A Theaia submitted to the Pacultyot the Graduate Sohool, Marquette University, in Partial Fulfillment ot the Re­ quirements tor the Degree of Master of Arts .. · Milwauke., Wisconsin ay, 1948 O(Jl:ltents n.:.1"\9 ~ l1:'efQoe ••••• ~4o ............... jO .. .. .. ', ......... .... " ....... .. 1 lhapter I 'A'he Hist,orioal Ba ok~round , . 'l'he Husstan Intel116eIl1a~:ta ............. ~ ....., ••• ,......... .. 6 The i. r:l t:tngs ot ilJ.exander He r zen ••, ' • .,., ... it ....... ., ..... a ,ahernyehevs1:cl nnd his ldeas, l?ete"r LavrOV ...... jO ..... 10 Bel:1:n.sky end Ba ~~unl n .... I. ;0 '••••••••• ;0 ....., .................11 Tt:;.aohev and Plekhanov f theori ate or revolution ... II •• la tater Russian Ll terature • •••••• '••••• ' ••••' .......... " .la rxinm (lna lta influence ... ....... ...................16 'he Poll tioal. Phaae 11 at'O'noal Qb j eO' tl 'ICS of '1'ea r i ,slG..., it •••' .......... 20 The l:leoembl'i,sts .............. .. ... .. .............. ,.... 23 'rhe re:tr!n of' Mi ollOlu.s II ........................... ... 26 Chapter II 'J.1he lnf,luenoe of .Pe).'~ona11 ties p - l The T·ger Nl chalas II ........ .... '. '... .. ..... II! II! .......... 34 The ..c;mp l,,~ s 9 end Has put111 • •, ••••• , .... .... '" • "'. "' ••• "' .. 39 cn1n •• • '. "". •• Ie !•• •• • " ••• 0 • ~ ••••• • .•• Ct ................, . 44 '.i:rotsk y ........' .,Ii. II ••••••• :0 •••• ;0 .. '" '" w' .... '" '" '. '.... '" ••• ",. 47 Ohapter III The Influ ~ nl3e_ of the fiar The ~. ar and 1 ts effeots •••••• '" . .... ............... 5., 1sta1:;es i ntbe \'lo r e ttort and the! r effeot. "' •••• 5 he Vlar years of Ni aholas II . ........... '0., ••• "' ••• • 57 he lIar and i ts effcot on Huss1an eoonolay ......... 59 The f all of the uonorohy ••••••••••••••••••••••••• G2 Chapter IV Pase The Soviets Strussl.
    [Show full text]
  • Revolution in Real Time: the Russian Provisional Government, 1917
    ODUMUNC 2020 Crisis Brief Revolution in Real Time: The Russian Provisional Government, 1917 ODU Model United Nations Society Introduction seventy-four years later. The legacy of the Russian Revolution continues to be keenly felt The Russian Revolution began on 8 March 1917 to this day. with a series of public protests in Petrograd, then the Winter Capital of Russia. These protests But could it have gone differently? Historians lasted for eight days and eventually resulted in emphasize the contingency of events. Although the collapse of the Russian monarchy, the rule of history often seems inventible afterwards, it Tsar Nicholas II. The number of killed and always was anything but certain. Changes in injured in clashes with the police and policy choices, in the outcome of events, government troops in the initial uprising in different players and different accidents, lead to Petrograd is estimated around 1,300 people. surprising outcomes. Something like the Russian Revolution was extremely likely in 1917—the The collapse of the Romanov dynasty ushered a Romanov Dynasty was unable to cope with the tumultuous and violent series of events, enormous stresses facing the country—but the culminating in the Bolshevik Party’s seizure of revolution itself could have ended very control in November 1917 and creation of the differently. Soviet Union. The revolution saw some of the most dramatic and dangerous political events the Major questions surround the Provisional world has ever known. It would affect much Government that struggled to manage the chaos more than Russia and the ethnic republics Russia after the Tsar’s abdication.
    [Show full text]
  • THE MENSHEVIKS in 1917 by Olegpmwkov Bachelor of Arts
    THE MENSHEVIKS IN 1917 r:. = BY OLEGpmwKOV Bachelor of Arts Moscow State Pedagogical Institute Moscow, USSR 1983 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS July 1992 THE MENSHEVIKS IN 1917 Thesis Approved: Thesis Advisor 0 Dean of the Graduate College 11 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I wish to express sincere appreciation to Dr. George F. Jewsbury and Dr. Joel M. Jenswold for their encouragement and advice throughout my graduate program. Many thanks also go to Dr. W. Roger Biles for serving on my graduate committee. Their suggestions and support were very helpful throughout the study. To Wann Smith for his expert typing and proofing skills; to Oscar Kursner for his help in translation. My wife, Y elaina Khripkov, encouraged and supported me all the way and helped me keep the end goal constantly in sight. Thanks go to her for her undivided time in the final stages of the project. She prov 1ded moral support and was a real believer in my abilities. 111 TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page I. The Main Approaches to the Study of the Russian Revolution in American Historiography 2 The Study of Menshevism in the U.S. 6 Soviet Scholars on Menshevism 8 Sources 1 2 Themes and Problems 14 II. Tiffi "HONEYMOON' OF Tiffi REVOLUTION_~-~-~! 8 The Necessity for the Dual Power 1 8 The Essence and Structure of Dual Power 2 7 Establishing of the Revolutionary Defensists Policy3 5 III. THE APRIL CRISIS AND ITS CONSEQUENCES _____4 7 The First Clash.
    [Show full text]
  • Socialism in Europe and the Russian Revolution India and the Contemporary World Society Ofthefuture
    Socialism in Europe and II the Russian Revolution Chapter 1 The Age of Social Change In the previous chapter you read about the powerful ideas of freedom and equality that circulated in Europe after the French Revolution. The French Revolution opened up the possibility of creating a dramatic change in the way in which society was structured. As you have read, before the eighteenth century society was broadly divided into estates and orders and it was the aristocracy and church which controlled economic and social power. Suddenly, after the revolution, it seemed possible to change this. In many parts of the world including Europe and Asia, new ideas about individual rights and who olution controlled social power began to be discussed. In India, Raja v Rammohan Roy and Derozio talked of the significance of the French Revolution, and many others debated the ideas of post-revolutionary Europe. The developments in the colonies, in turn, reshaped these ideas of societal change. ian Re ss Not everyone in Europe, however, wanted a complete transformation of society. Responses varied from those who accepted that some change was necessary but wished for a gradual shift, to those who wanted to restructure society radically. Some were ‘conservatives’, others were ‘liberals’ or ‘radicals’. What did these terms really mean in the context of the time? What separated these strands of politics and what linked them together? We must remember that these terms do not mean the same thing in all contexts or at all times. We will look briefly at some of the important political traditions of the nineteenth century, and see how they influenced change.
    [Show full text]
  • TIMELINE of EVENTS March 1917 Tsar Nicholas Abdicates and The
    TIMELINE OF EVENTS March 1917 Tsar Nicholas abdicates and the Provisional Government takes over supported by the Soviet. It now has to deal with all the problems which led to the downfall of the Tsar – the war, food shortages and peasant demands for land…. April 16th 1917 Lenin arrives in Russia. He makes a speech demanding an end to the war with Germany, land for the peasants and nationalisation of banks. He insists that no support be given to the Provisional Government – instead the Soviets (there are Soviets in other cities) should get together and form a new government. These ideas became known as the April Theses. June 1917 The Provisional Government orders the armies to attack Austria. This fails and turns into a retreat. Soldiers began to desert in large numbers. Many go to Petrograd and join the Bolsheviks demanding an end to the Provisional Government July 1917 100000 soldiers and Bolsheviks are out in the streets demanding ‘All power to the Soviets’. These three days of rioting in Petrograd are known as the July Days. Kerensky sends loyal troops into the city to deal with the uprising. He claims the Bolsheviks have been paid by Germany to make trouble and Lenin is a German agent. Lenin has to leave Russia to avoid arrest and goes to Finland. Other leading Bolsheviks are arrested. The Bolsheviks have become unpopular and weak. August 1917 Kerensky become leader of the Provisional Government. He has to deal with a challenge from General Kornilov, Commander in Chief of the army who wants to take control.
    [Show full text]
  • Background Guide, and to Issac and Stasya for Being Great Friends During Our Weird Chicago Summer
    Russian Duma 1917 (DUMA) MUNUC 33 ONLINE 1 Russian Duma 1917 (DUMA) | MUNUC 33 Online TABLE OF CONTENTS ______________________________________________________ CHAIR LETTERS………………………….….………………………….……..….3 ROOM MECHANICS…………………………………………………………… 6 STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM………………………….……………..…………......9 HISTORY OF THE PROBLEM………………………………………………………….16 ROSTER……………………………………………………….………………………..23 BIBLIOGRAPHY………………………………………………………..…………….. 46 2 Russian Duma 1917 (DUMA) | MUNUC 33 Online CHAIR LETTERS ____________________________________________________ My Fellow Russians, We stand today on the edge of a great crisis. Our nation has never been more divided, more war- stricken, more fearful of the future. Yet, the promise and the greatness of Russia remains undaunted. The Russian Provisional Government can and will overcome these challenges and lead our Motherland into the dawn of a new day. Out of character. To introduce myself, I’m a fourth-year Economics and History double major, currently writing a BA thesis on World War II rationing in the United States. I compete on UChicago’s travel team and I additionally am a CD for our college conference. Besides that, I am the VP of the Delta Kappa Epsilon fraternity, previously a member of an all-men a cappella group and a proud procrastinator. This letter, for example, is about a month late. We decided to run this committee for a multitude of reasons, but I personally think that Russian in 1917 represents such a critical point in history. In an unlikely way, the most autocratic regime on Earth became replaced with a socialist state. The story of this dramatic shift in government and ideology represents, to me, one of the most interesting parts of history: that sometimes facts can be stranger than fiction.
    [Show full text]
  • HUGH PHILLIPS (Bowling Green, KY, USA)
    HUGH PHILLIPS (Bowling Green, KY, USA) "A BAD BUSINESS"-THE FEBRUARY REVOLUTION IN TVER'* The February Revolution of 1917 ended hundreds of years of Russian monarchial absolutism and established Russia virtually overnight as the "frees country in the world." Yet the nature of this revolution, especially the course of events in the provinces, has only recently become accessible to archival study owing to the collapse of the Soviet regime that for so long wished to see only its version of events. To be sure, historians have made admirable and useful efforts to understand February under these unfavor- able circumstances. Most notably, Ronald G. Suny and Donald Raleigh have written indispensable accounts of the entire revolutionary process of 1917 in Baku and Saratov, respectively, but neither was able to consult local archives. Indeed, Raleigh conducted his research without being allowed even to visit the city.1 Until scholars possess a comprehensive body of archival- based literature that encompasses events beyond Petrograd and Moscow, a complete history of the February Revolution will remain impossible. This article is intended to contribute to this effort through a study of the ancient Russian city of Tver', located about 150 miles northwest of Moscow on the rail-line to St. Petersburg. Broadly speaking, I have two objectives. First, I 1. Ronald G. Suny, The Baku Commune, 1917-1918 (Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press, 1972) and Donald J. Raleigh, Revolution on the Volga:Saratov in 1917 (Ithaca, NY:Cornell Univ.Press, 1986). Rex Wade's, Red Guards and Workers' Militias in the Russian Revolution,(Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ.
    [Show full text]
  • THE RUSSIAN REVOLUTION and the SOVIET STATE 1917-1921 STUDIES in RUSSIA and EAST EUROPE Formerly Studies in Russian and East European History
    THE RUSSIAN REVOLUTION AND THE SOVIET STATE 1917-1921 STUDIES IN RUSSIA AND EAST EUROPE formerly Studies in Russian and East European History Chairman of the Editorial Board: M.A. Branch, Director, School of Slavonic and East European Studies This series includes books on general, political, historical, economic, social and cultural themes relating to Russia and East Europe written or edited by members of the School of Slavonic and East European Studies in the University of London, or by authors wor\ling in a~~oc\at\on '»\\\\ the School. Titles already published are listed below. Further titles are in preparation. Phyllis Auty and Richard Clogg (editors) BRITISH POLICY TOWARDS WARTIME RESISTANCE IN YUGOSLAVIA AND GREECE Elisabeth Barker BRITISH POLICY IN SOUTH·EAST EUROPE IN THE SECOND WORLD WAR Richard Clogg (editor) THE MOVEMENT FOR GREEK INDEPENDENCE, 1770-1821: A COLLECTION OF DOCUMENTS Olga Crisp STUDIES IN THE RUSSIAN ECONOMY BEFORE 1914 D. G. Kirby (editor) FINLAND AND RUSSIA, 1808-1920: DOCUMENTS Martin McCauley THE RUSSIAN REVOLUTION AND THE SOVIET STATE, 1917-1921: DOCUMENTS (editor) KHRUSHCHEV AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF SOVIET AGRICULTURE COMMUNIST POWER IN EUROPE 1944-1949 (editor) MARXISM-LENINISM IN THE GERMAN DEMOCRATRIC REPUBLIC: THE SOCIALIST UNITY PARTY (SED) THE GERMAN DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC SINCE 1945 Evan Mawdsley THE RUSSIAN REVOLUTION AND THE BALTIC FLEET The School of Slavonic and East European Studies was founded in 1915 at King's College. Among the first members of staff was Profcs.mr T. G. Masaryk. later President of the Czechoslovak Republic, who delivered the opening lecture in October 1915 on The problems of small nations in the European crisis'.
    [Show full text]
  • Module 03: 1917 — Did the War Cause a Revolution? Context
    Module 03: 1917 — Did the War Cause a Revolution? Context Russia Under the Tsar The narrative below provides a brief overview of the main developments between the outbreak of World War I in August 1914 and Russia's withdrawal from that conflict in March 1918. On the eve of the war, Russia remained one of the most politically antiquated regimes in Europe. An autocratic system of government accorded nearly unlimited power to the tsar, who expected obedience and reverence from his 163 million subjects. The population under his rule included representatives of nearly seventy non-Russian ethnic groups dispersed over more than eight million square miles of territory. The overwhelming majority of the population relied on agriculture for their livelihood, although state-sponsored industrialization programs in the late nineteenth century had stimulated urbanization and social diversification, as the ranks of professionals and other "middling" orders increased along with those of the industrial working class. While supporting some measure of economic modernization, the government remained steadfastly hostile to any form of independent civic organization or political activity, whether it derived from liberal hopes for a parliamentary system and the rule of law, or the more radical socialist ideologies embraced by Russian workers. The Russo-Japanese War The aspirations of a rapidly changing society and the growing tensions between the population and a regime intent on avoiding political reform burst into the open in 1905, as the autocracy grappled with a humiliating defeat in the Russo- Japanese war. The country erupted in revolution after troops guarding the Winter Palace gunned down unarmed demonstrators on what became known as "Bloody Sunday." Faced with widespread rebellion in the countryside, debilitating strikes in the cities, and liberal professionals' demands for civil and religious liberties, Tsar Nicholas II reluctantly agreed to the establishment of a national legislative body and the rule of law.
    [Show full text]
  • Simplified Study Packet Version Russian Revolution
    Simplified Study Packet Version Russian Revolution 471. Give a brief description of Russia just before and during World War I? Nicholas II was a kind ruler. Perhaps, too kind to rule a nation struggling through a war. His wife, who was more commanding, seems to have controlled him at times. Unfortunately, she was unpopular, particularly after she started to allow Rasputin to come into the court circles. 472. Who initially led the government of Russia after the fall of the Czar? Alexander Kerensky 473. What was probably one of the main reasons Kerensky fell from power? He sought to keep Russia in the war, whereas most Russians were suffering and wanted to end the war. 474. What Communist slogan appealed to the masses? Bread, Land, Peace 475. What Treaty between the Bolsheviks and the Germans pulled Russia out of the war? The Treaty of Brest Litovsk 476. How did the Bolsheviks unwittingly help to defeat the Germans? The Bolsheviks who now ruled Russia, delayed signing a peace treaty with Germany, forcing the Germans to keep troops in Russia for too long. By the time the Germans transferred their troops to the West, it was too late. 477. Give a brief description of the German government’s dealings with Lenin? They sent him back to Russia in a sealed train and gave him money in the hopes that his Bolshevik party, which opposed the war, would help to take Russia out of the war. 478. In what month did the October Revolution occur? November, It was October by the Russian calendar.
    [Show full text]
  • Visual Metaphors for the People a Study of Cinematic Propoganda in Sergei Eisenstein’S Film
    VIsual Metaphors for the people A Study of Cinematic Propoganda in Sergei Eisenstein’s Film ashley brown This paper attempTs To undersTand how The celebraTed and conTroversial figure of sergei eisensTein undersTood and conTribuTed To The formaTion of The sovieT union Through his films of The 1920s. The lens of visual meTaphors offer a specific insighT inTo how arTisTic choices of The direcTor were informed by his own pedagogy for The russian revoluTion. The paper asks The quesTions: did eisensTein’s films reflecT The official parTy rheToric? how did They inform or moTivaTe The public Toward The communisT ideology of The early sovieT union? The primary sources used in This pa- per are from The films Strike (1925), BattleShip potemkin (1926), octoBer (1928), and the General line (1929). eisensTein creaTed visual meTaphors Through The juxTaposi- Tion of images in his films which alluded To higher concepTs. a shoT of a worker followed by The shoT of gears Turning creaTed The concepT of indusTry in The minds of The audience. Through visual meTaphors, iT is possible To undersTand The moTives of eisensTein and The communisT parTy. iT is also possible, wiTh The aid of secondary sources, To see how Those moTives differed. “Language is much closer to film than painting is. For example, aimed at the “... organization of the psychology of the in painting the form arises from abstract elements of line and masses.”6 Works about Eisenstein in the field of film color, while in cinema the material concreteness of the image theory examine Eisenstein’s career in theater, the evolution within the frame presents—as an element—the greatest of his approach to montage, and his artistic expression.7 difficulty in manipulation.
    [Show full text]