1 October 29, 2018 Dr. Mark Schlissel President, University of Michigan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

1 October 29, 2018 Dr. Mark Schlissel President, University of Michigan October 29, 2018 Dr. Mark Schlissel President, University of Michigan 503 Thompson Street Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1340 Dear President Schlissel: We write you as scholars from Columbia and Stanford Universities who share grave concerns about the University of Michigan’s decision to impose serious discipline on a member of its faculty, Professor John Cheney-Lippold, who sought to uphold the University’s core value of equality in educational opportunity by declining to write a letter of recommendation for a student applying for a study abroad program in Israel. The University of Michigan has distinguished itself as a leader in protecting the twin rights of non-discrimination and diversity in the university setting, especially in its very public role defending admissions policies designed to create a diverse student body in Grutter v. Bollinger before the Supreme Court. It is our belief that Professor Cheney- Lippold was upholding this tradition when he informed a student that his commitment to furthering equality in education and human rights for all rendered him unable to supply her with a letter of recommendation for study in Israel. It is widely known that persons of Palestinian or Arab nationality are systematically denied entry to Israel, subject to enhanced interrogation at points of entry to Israel, and/or are profiled and discriminated against when seeking visas or other terms of entry into the state of Israel. Similar forms of discriminatory treatment have been meted out to students from the U.S. who have voiced any critical views of Israel’s human rights record and who seek to study in Israel. As has been widely reported, in early October the Israeli government denied entry to a Palestinian-American student from the U.S. who held a visa to study at the Hebrew University, and she was held in bed bug ridden detention at the Tel Aviv airport for almost two weeks on the grounds that she has been involved in campus organizing critical of Israel. She was permitted to enter Israel only after she denounced any connection to organizations that have criticized Israel’s human rights record. The University of Michigan’s Regent’s Bylaws and the University’s policies on “Discrimination and Harassment” articulate a very strong commitment “to maintain an academic and work environment free of discrimination and harassment for all students.” Indeed, the policy specifically states that prohibited discrimination includes contexts in which a person’s national origin “is used as the basis for or a factor in decisions affecting that individual’s employment, education, living environment or participation in a University activity.” The first example provided in this policy states that: “Denying a person access to an educational program based on that person’s … national origin” constitutes conduct that amounts to prohibited discrimination under the University’s rules. 1 This was the precise situation Professor Cheney-Lippold faced when asked to support the application of a student for study in Israel: a request that he lend his professional reputation and academic expertise to a program that openly denies students access to educational opportunities based on the students’ national origin. Professor Cheney- Lippold was required to swear to the following when he began his employment at the University of Michigan: “I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support the Constitution of the United States of America and the Constitution of the State of Michigan. And that I will faithfully discharge the duties of my position, according to the best of my ability.” We believe that Professor Cheney-Lippold understood himself to be fulfilling this oath when he was faced with a request that he participate in a discriminatory educational program – the study abroad program in Israel. What is more, the University of Michigan’s actions against Professor Cheney-Lippold violate the First Amendment free speech protections insofar as the University has disciplined him for speaking on matters of public concern, and now attempts to censor his speech on the relation of his teaching to his views on human rights in Israel/Palestine. Finally, the actions taken by the University of Michigan raise serious problems of due process, as noted by a recent opinion letter from the American Association of University Professors. At the time John Cheney-Lippold declined to write a letter of recommendation, neither the University of Michigan nor the AAUP had any rule that mandated professors write such letters. Yet on October 3, Elizabeth Cole, the interim dean of the University of Michigan’s College of Literature, Science and the Arts, wrote Cheney-Lippold a disciplinary letter. In the letter she states, “Your conduct has fallen far short of the University’s and College’s expectations for how LSA faculty interact with and treat students… This letter is a strong warning that your behavior in this circumstance was inappropriate and will not be tolerated.” She also informed him that because of his action, he would not receive a merit raise, would be deprived of sabbaticals, and might be dismissed from the university if “a similar incident occurs in the future.” Given these circumstances we object to the University’s decision to impose serious discipline on Professor Cheney-Lippold. That discipline should be rescinded and the University should recognize that Professor Cheney-Lippold was acting to protect the right to equal educational opportunity of all University of Michigan students, in keeping with University policies. Signed:∗ Joel Beinin Donald J. McLachlan Professor of History and Professor of Middle East History Emeritus Stanford University ∗ Affiliations provided for identification purposes only. 2 Jessica Collins Associate Professor Department of Philosophy Columbia University Patricia A. Dailey Dr. Patricia Dailey, Ph.D. Associate Professor of English and Comparative Literature Columbia University Ann Douglas Parr Professor Emerita of English and Comparative Literature Columbia University Nadia Abu El-Haj Professor, Department of Anthropology & Co-Director, The Center for Palestine Studies Columbia University Katherine Franke Sulzbacher Professor of Law Professor of Gender and Sexuality Studies, Institute for Research on Women, Gender and Sexuality Columbia University Jack Halberstam Professor of English and Gender Studies Columbia University Michael Harris Professor of Mathematics Columbia University Joseph A. Howley Associate Professor of Classics Columbia University Tom Kalin Professor Columbia University School of the Arts, Film Jeremy Kessler Associate Professor of Law Columbia University 3 Rashid Khalidi Edward Said Professor of Modern Arab Studies Columbia University Tovah P. Klein, Ph.D. Adj. Associate Professor, Psychology Barnard College Gregory Mann Professor, History Department Columbia University Joseph Massad Professor, MESAAS Columbia University Brinkley Messick Professor of Anthropology Columbia University David Palumbo-Liu Louise Hewlett Nixon Professor and Professor of Comparative Literature Stanford University Gregory M. Pflugfelder Associate Professor EALAC / History Columbia University Sheldon Pollock Arvind Raghunathan Professor of Sanskrit and South Asian Studies Columbia University Rush Rehm Professor, Theater and Performance Studies, and Classics, Artistic Director, Stanford Repertory Theater (SRT) Stanford University Bruce Robbins Old Dominion Foundation Professor in the Humanities Columbia Univeristy James Schamus Professor of Professional Practice Columbia University School of the Arts 4 Michael Taussig Class of 1933 Professor of Anthropology Columbia University Gray Tuttle Leila Hadley Luce Professor of Modern Tibetan Studies Columbia University Marc Van De Mieroop History Department Columbia University 5 .
Recommended publications
  • The Struggle for Worker Rights in EGYPT AREPORTBYTHESOLIDARITYCENTER
    67261_SC_S3_R1_Layout 1 2/5/10 6:58 AM Page 1 I JUSTICE I JUSTICE for ALL for I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I “This timely and important report about the recent wave of labor unrest in Egypt, the country’s largest social movement ALL The Struggle in more than half a century, is essential reading for academics, activists, and policy makers. It identifies the political and economic motivations behind—and the legal system that enables—the government’s suppression of worker rights, in a well-edited review of the country’s 100-year history of labor activism.” The Struggle for Worker Rights Sarah Leah Whitson Director, Middle East and North Africa Division, Human Rights Watch I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I for “This is by far the most comprehensive and detailed account available in English of the situation of Egypt’s working people Worker Rights today, and of their struggles—often against great odds—for a better life. Author Joel Beinin recounts the long history of IN EGYPT labor activism in Egypt, including lively accounts of the many strikes waged by Egyptian workers since 2004 against declining real wages, oppressive working conditions, and violations of their legal rights, and he also surveys the plight of A REPORT BY THE SOLIDARITY CENTER women workers, child labor and Egyptian migrant workers abroad.
    [Show full text]
  • Section 1 Palestine, Israel and the Arab-Israeli Conflict: a Primer
    Section 1 Palestine, Israel and the Arab-Israeli Conflict: A Primer Joel Beinin and Lisa Hajjar The conflict between Palestinian Arabs and Jews is a modern phenomenon, which began around the turn of the 20th century. Although these two groups have different religions (Palestinians include Muslims, Christians and Druze), religious differences are not the cause of the conflict. It is essentially a struggle over land. Until 1948, the area that both groups claimed was known internationally as Palestine. But following the war of 1948- 49, this land was divided into three parts: the state of Israel, the West Bank (of the Jordan River) and the Gaza Strip. This is a small area: approximately 10,000 square miles, or about the size of the state of Maryland. The competing claims are not reconcilable if one group exercises exclusive political control over the total territory. Jewish claims to this land are based on the biblical promise to Abraham and his descendants, on the fact that this was the historical site of the Jewish kingdom of Israel (which was destroyed by the Roman Empire), and on Jews’ need for a haven from European anti-Semitism. Palestinian Arabs’ claims to the land are based on continuous residence in the country for hundreds of years and the fact that they represented the demographic majority. They reject the notion that a biblical-era kingdom constitutes the basis for a valid modern claim. If Arabs engage the biblical argument at all, they maintain that since Abraham’s son Ishmael is the forefather of the Arabs, then God’s promise of the land to the children of Abraham includes Arabs as well.
    [Show full text]
  • Intellectuals, Socialists, Capitalists, and Binationalism in Mandate Palestine Joel Beinin
    Intellectuals, Socialists, Capitalists, and Binationalism in Mandate Palestine Joel Beinin he likelihood of a “two-state” solution political association. Brit Shalom barely minority bloc in the Yishuv. To broaden the to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is on survived the Arab riots of 1929; it ceased binationalist coalition, in 1942 the League Tan asymptotic trajectory precipitously activity in 1933. In response to the violence for Arab-Jewish Rapprochement joined Ih . ud, approaching zero. The present reality is a Ruppin abandoned binationalism while an association established by intellectuals highly unequal de facto binational state. Kohn broke with Zionism altogether. Despite around Judah Magnes. Ih . ud there by became Between the two world wars, Zionist advocates the intellectual brilliance of its leaders, Brit a much more substantial organization than of binationalism believed that guaranteeing Shalom never had more than a few hundred Brit Shalom. the civic and national equality of Jews and adherents. It had no social or political base. In 1946 Ha-Shomer Ha-Z. a‘ir and the Arabs would make it easier to establish Henrietta Szold, the founder of Hadassah, Socialist League fused to form the Ha-Shomer a Jewish national home in Palestine. But supported Brit Shalom and its successor, Ih . ud. H a - Z. a‘ir Workers’ Party. Two-thirds of its ten for those actively engaged in the Zionist But she did not represent Hadassah’s views thousand members were kibbutzniks. The settlement project, binationalism was always on this issue. For many Zionists who believed party delegated Mordechai Ben-Tov to draft fraught with contradictions. they were more “pragmatic,” the identifica- a book-length memorandum entitled The H.
    [Show full text]
  • The American University in Cairo Government and Politics in Egypt
    The American University in Cairo Government and Politics in Egypt Fall-2016 Instructor: Ashraf El Sherif Monday-Thursday 3:35-4:55 pm WALEED C148 Office hours: Monday-Thursday 12:30-2:00 pm Office: HUSS 2027 Email: [email protected] Course Objective This course offers a historical and thematic analysis of the nature and dynamics of modern Egyptian politics including the state institutions, civil-military relations, parliaments and political parties, ideology and political economy. The objective of this course is to study the evolution of Egypt's political institutions, processes and dynamics highlighting its elements of continuity and change. The first part of the course will be chronological, intended to give students a basic knowledge of the history and evolution of Egyptian political institutions. The course will start by searching state origins in Mohammed Ali's time and the regime's origins in Nasser's time. We will then proceed to Sadat's period that constituted the backdrop of the Mubarak's periods that will form the second part of the course.. The second part will be thematic, in which we will deepen our knowledge of some key political issues facing Egypt today that have led Egypt to the 2011 revolution and shape its post 2011 political arena till the reconsolidation of authoritarianism in the post- 2013 era. Such themes will include but are not limited to the following:, the rise of the second republic, civil participation, social movements, civil society, ideological actors, the role of the military, parliamentary elections, presidential elections and the evolving legal structure. The last part of the course will highlight the 2011 revolution and its political impacts including the counter-revolution and re- consolidation of state authoritarianism under General Abdel-Fattah al-Sisi and the military rule.
    [Show full text]
  • Middle East Studies
    STANFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS MIDDLE EAST STUDIES 20% DISCOUNT ON ALL TITLES 2021 TABLE OF CONTENTS Stanford Studies in Middle Eastern and Islamic Societies and Cultures................................2-7 History .........................................8-13 Politics ....................................... 14-15 Worlding the Middle East ....... 15 Culture and Heritage .......... 16-18 Stanford Briefs............................. 18 Digital Publishing Initiative ....19 Cover image: Nabil Anani, Nostalgia, 2016, acrylic on canvas, 120 x 105 cm. Courtesy of Zawyeh Gallery and the artist. ORDERING Showpiece City Archive Wars Use code S21MES to receive How Architecture Made Dubai The Politics of History in a 20% discount on all ISBNs Todd Reisz Saudi Arabia listed in this catalog. In 1959, experts agreed that if Rosie Bsheer Visit sup.org to order online. Visit Dubai was to become something The production of history is sup.org/help/orderingbyphone/ more than an unruly port, a plan premised on the selective erasure of for information on phone was needed. Specifically, a town orders. Books not yet published certain pasts and the artifacts that or temporarily out of stock will be plan was prescribed to fortify the stand witness to them. From the charged to your credit card when city from obscurity and disorder. elision of archival documents to the they become available and are in With the proverbial handshake, demolition of sacred and secular the process of being shipped. Dubai’s ruler hired British architect spaces, each act of destruction is John Harris to design Dubai’s also an act of state building. Follow- strategy for capturing the world’s ing the 1991 Gulf War, political EXAMINATION COPY POLICY attention—and then its investments.
    [Show full text]
  • Section 1 Palestine, Israel and the Arab-Israeli Conflict: a Primer
    Section 1 Palestine, Israel and the Arab-Israeli Conflict: A Primer Joel Beinin and Lisa Hajjar The conflict between Palestinian Arabs and Jews is a modern phenomenon, which began around the turn of the 20th century. Although these two groups have different religions (Palestinians include Muslims, Christians and Druze), religious differences are not the cause of the conflict. It is essentially a struggle over land. Until 1948, the area that both groups claimed was known internationally as Palestine. But following the war of 1948- 49, this land was divided into three parts: the state of Israel, the West Bank (of the Jordan River) and the Gaza Strip. This is a small area: approximately 10,000 square miles, or about the size of the state of Maryland. The competing claims are not reconcilable if one group exercises exclusive political control over the total territory. Jewish claims to this land are based on the biblical promise to Abraham and his descendants, on the fact that this was the historical site of the Jewish kingdom of Israel (which was destroyed by the Roman Empire), and on Jews’ need for a haven from European anti-Semitism. Palestinian Arabs’ claims to the land are based on continuous residence in the country for hundreds of years and the fact that they represented the demographic majority. They reject the notion that a biblical-era kingdom constitutes the basis for a valid modern claim. If Arabs engage the biblical argument at all, they maintain that since Abraham’s son Ishmael is the forefather of the Arabs, then God’s promise of the land to the children of Abraham includes Arabs as well.
    [Show full text]
  • Joseph Berger: Communist Activist in Palestine and Victim of Stalinism (1904–1978) 161
    159 Mario Kessler links: Mario Kessler rechts: Joseph Berger: Communist Activist in Palestine Joseph Berger: and Victim of Stalinism (1904–1978) Communist Activist in Palestine and Victim of Stalinism (1904–1978) Abstract The Polish-born Joseph Berger took part in the founding of the Palestine Communist Party. The party had to operate under illegal conditions. Berger became deputy secretary of the party that joined the Comintern in March 1924. After the first Arab-Jewish civil war in August 1929 he became secretary of the party, but was, in 1930, expelled from the country by British mandate authorities. In Berlin he worked for the League against Imperialism. In 1932 he headed the Comintern’s Near Eastern Department in Moscow. In 1934 he was dismissed from his post and expelled from the party without any given reason. In January 1935 Berger was arrested and charged with being a Trotskyite agitator. He refused to “confess” and spent the next sixteen years in various Siberian labor camps. In 1951, he was released, only to be banished to life-long exile in Siberia. His wife and his son were also persecuted on his account, and they could see him only when they were allowed to visit him in Siberia. In 1956 Berger was officially rehabilitated and allowed to leave the Soviet Union for Poland. Soon the family decided to immigrate to Israel. Berger was invited to give lectures at Bar Ilan University. Later the university appointed him as an associate professor of political science. Berger had completely abandoned his com- munist faith and had become religious.
    [Show full text]
  • Al-Ahram Weekly | Books Supplement | in the Tracks of Egypt's Jews
    Al-Ahram Weekly | Books Supplement | In the tracks of Egypt's Jews 16 - 22 June 2005 Current issue Issue No. 747 Previous issue Books Supplement Site map Published in Cairo by AL-AHRAM established in 1875 Recommend Comment Printer-friendly In the tracks of Egypt's Jews Front Page Egypt -The Dispersion of Egyptian Jewry: Culture, Politics, and the Formation of a Modern Diaspora, Joel Beinin, Cairo and New York: Region The American University in Cairo Press, 2005. pp329 -Yahud misr Economy min al-izdihar ila al-shatat (Egypt's Jews: from Prosperity to Dispersion), Mohamed Aboul-Ghar, Cairo: Dar al-Hilal, 2004. pp246 Opinion Reader's corner Albert Arie, an Egyptian lawyer in his Press review mid-seventies, who was born a Jew in Cairo to a Turkish father and later Culture converted to Islam and married a Features Muslim woman, recently told a journalist from the magazine Egypt Heritage Today, who was interviewing him Living about his Jewish background, "What is it about this Jew rush these days? Sports Lately everyone seems to be excited Chronicles about the Jews of Egypt. Why?" Cartoons It is a legitimate question, as there Profile does seem to be a great demand these days for writings on Egyptian Jewry, People much as there is a great demand for Listings writings on the history of the monarchical regime in Egypt. BOOKS Egyptians want to know about the gaps TRAVEL in their modern history, and about topics that were either suppressed Site map during the era of high Nasserism, or when dealt with, were tinted by the ideological biases of the regime at the expense of historical fact.
    [Show full text]
  • POLI 347: Arab-Israel Conflict, Crisis, Peace Mcgill University, Winter 2021
    This course syllabus may be changed or modified by the instructor before and during the semester. Please use MyCourses to access the most recent document. POLI 347: Arab-Israel Conflict, Crisis, Peace McGill University, Winter 2021 Professor: Daniel Douek, PhD ([email protected]) Online Lectures: Mondays and Wednesdays 11:30AM-1:00PM Remote Office Hours: Wednesdays and Thursdays, 10:00-11:00AM Email: [email protected] Course Description: The Arab-Israeli conflict is one of the most intractable and multifaceted protracted conflicts in modern times. Its divisions have cut across the international, domestic, communal, and religious levels, among others. Its key actors have often shifted: from pre-1948 violence between Jews and Arabs in British Mandatory Palestine, to the civil war that Israelis call the War of Independence and Palestinians call the Naqba (disaster). From 1948 until the end of the Cold War, the conflict played out primarily as a rivalry between Israel and the Arab states, including wars in 1948, 1956, 1967, 1973, and 1982. Since the First Intifada of 1987-93, the Palestinian struggle for independence from Israeli military rule in the West Bank and Gaza has re-emerged as the conflict’s fulcrum, and non-state actors such as Hamas and Hezbollah have overshadowed the Arab States as the main combatants. Meanwhile, the rivalry between Israel and Iran – which is a Middle Eastern, but not an Arab country- has become one of the most dangerous contemporary global flashpoints. There have also been attempts to negotiate peace: successful ones, such as between Israel and Egypt, Israel and Jordan, and Israel and the United Arab Emirates and Bahrain; and failures, most notably between Israel and Palestinians.
    [Show full text]
  • Socialism Without Socialists Egyptian Marxists and Nasserist State 1952 to 1965.Pdf
    A Thesis entitled Socialism without Socialists: Egyptian Marxists and the Nasserist State, 1952-65 by Derek A. Ide Submitted to the Graduate Faculty as partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Masters of Arts Degree in History University of Toledo _______________________________________________ Dr. Ovamir Anjum, Committee Chair _______________________________________________ Dr. Roberto Padilla, Committee Member _______________________________________________ Dr. Todd Michney, Committee Member _______________________________________________ Dr. Patricia R. Komuniecki, Dean College of Graduate Studies The University of Toledo May 2015 Copyright 2015, Derek A. Ide This document is copyrighted material. Under copyright law, no parts of this document may be reproduced without the expressed permission of the author An Abstract of Socialism without Socialists: Egyptian Marxists and the Nasserist State, 1952-65 by Derek A. Ide Submitted to the Graduate Faculty as partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Masters of Arts Degree in History University of Toledo This thesis investigates the interaction between Egyptian Marxists and the Egyptian State under Gamal Abd Al-Nasser from 1952 to 1965. After the Free Officer coup of July, 1952, the new government launched a period of repression that targeted many political organizations, including the communists. Repression against the communists was interrupted during a brief interlude from mid-1956 until the end of 1958, when Nasser launched a second period of repression heavily aimed at the communist left. Utilizing quantitative data of the communist prisoner population as well as qualitative first-hand accounts from imprisoned communists, this thesis reconstructs the conditions, demographics, and class status of the communists targeted by the repressive apparatus of the Egyptian state. It also explores the subjective response of the Egyptian communists and their ideological shifts vis-à-vis changing material and repressive conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • TOGO MIZRAHI and the MAKING of EGYPTIAN CINEMA TOGO Ing a Local Cinema Industry Was a Project of National Importance
    FILM & MEDIA STUDIES | MIDDLE EASTERN STUDIES | JEWISH STUDIES STARR IN THIS BOOK, DEBORAH A. STARR recuperates the work of Togo Mizrahi, a pio- neer of Egyptian cinema. Mizrahi, an Egyptian Jew with Italian nationality, established himself as a prolifi c director of popular comedies and musicals in the 1930s and 1940s. As a studio owner and producer, Mizrahi promoted the idea that develop- TOGO MIZRAHI AND THE MAKING OF EGYPTIAN CINEMA TOGO TOGO ing a local cinema industry was a project of national importance. Togo Mizrahi and the Making of Egyptian Cinema integrates fi lm analysis with fi lm history to tease out the cultural and political implications of Mizrahi’s work. His movies, Starr argues, subvert dominant notions of race, gender, and nationality through their playful——and queer——use of masquerade and mistaken identity. Taken together, Mizrahi’s fi lms offer a hopeful vision of a pluralist Egypt. By reevaluating Mizrahi’s contributions to Egyp- tian culture, Starr challenges readers to reconsider the debates over who is Egyptian MIZRAHI and what constitutes national cinema. and the “A captivating account of Egyptian film director Togo Mizrahi. Starr shows that Mizrahi’s distinct, often comical vision of Egypt captured a dramatic moment of social, MAKING OF political, and cultural transformation in which people of diverse backgrounds coex- isted and struggled to achieve better lives.” JOEL GORDON, author of Revolution- ary Melodrama: Popular Film and Civic Identity in Nasser’s Egypt EGYPTIAN CINEMA “A remarkable study of a remarkable career. Starr offers a comprehensive analysis of a life in fi lmmaking that adds nuance to our defi nition of Egyptian nationalism and enhances our appreciation of Alexandrian cinema.
    [Show full text]
  • Crown Center Working Paper: Between National Liberation And
    Crown Center for Middle East Studies Brandeis University Between National Liberation and Anti-Colonial Struggle: The National Liberation League in Palestine Dr. Abigail Jacobson Working Paper 3 August 2012 Crown Center Working Papers Working Papers are article-length scholarly works in progress by Crown Center researchers. They aim to reflect the wide range of scholarship conducted by various faculty, senior, and junior fellows during their stay at the Crown Center. These articles have not undergone peer- review and may only be downloaded for personal use. Permission for attribution lies solely with the Working Paper’s author. About the Author Dr. Abigail Jacobson was a Junior Research Fellow at the Crown Center for Middle East Studies at Brandeis University in 2011-12. Currently she is a Lecturer in History at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Jacobson received her PhD from the University of Chicago in 2006 and her book, entitled “From Empire to Empire: Jerusalem between Ottoman and British Rule” was published by Syracuse University Press in July 2011. Author’s Note This paper is based on a research conducted originally under the guidance of Prof. Asher Susser from Tel Aviv University. The paper was written during my fellowship year at the Crown Center for Middle East Studies at Brandeis University. I wish to express my deep thanks to all members of the Crown Center, and especially to Prof. Shai Feldman, Prof. Naghmeh Sohrabi, Prof. Kanan Makiyah, and Dr. Peter Krause, as well as to Prof. Eugene Sheppard (NEJS) for their excellent comments. This paper is under review: do not use without the permission of the author.
    [Show full text]