DOCSLIB.ORG

IUCN Red List Guidelines

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
IUCN Red List Guidelines Guidelines for Using the IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria Version 14 (August 2019) Prepared by the Standards and Petitions Committee of the IUCN Species Survival Commission. Citation: IUCN Standards and Petitions Committee. 2019. Guidelines for Using the IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria. Version 14. Prepared by the Standards and Petitions Committee. Downloadable from http://www.iucnredlist.org/documents/RedListGuidelines.pdf. THE IUCN RED LIST OF THREATENED SPECIES™ Contents 1. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................... 5 2. AN OUTLINE OF THE RED LIST CATEGORIES AND CRITERIA............................................... 5 2.1 TAXONOMIC LEVEL AND SCOPE OF THE CATEGORIZATION PROCESS ........................................................ 5 2.1.1 Taxonomic scale of categorization ................................................................................................ 5 2.1.2 Geographical scale of categorization ........................................................................................... 7 2.1.3 Introduced taxa and subpopulations ............................................................................................. 8 2.1.4 Managed subpopulations .............................................................................................................. 9 2.2 NATURE OF THE CATEGORIES ................................................................................................................ 10 2.2.1 Transfer between categories ....................................................................................................... 12 2.3 NATURE OF THE CRITERIA...................................................................................................................... 14 2.3.1 The quantitative thresholds ......................................................................................................... 18 2.4 CONSERVATION PRIORITIES AND ACTIONS ............................................................................................. 19 2.5 DOCUMENTATION .................................................................................................................................. 20 3. DATA QUALITY .................................................................................................................................... 20 3.1 DATA AVAILABILITY, INFERENCE, SUSPICION AND PROJECTION............................................................. 20 3.2 UNCERTAINTY ....................................................................................................................................... 21 3.2.1 Types of uncertainty .................................................................................................................... 22 3.2.2 Representing uncertainty ............................................................................................................ 22 3.2.3 Dispute tolerance and risk tolerance .......................................................................................... 22 3.2.4 Dealing with uncertainty ............................................................................................................. 23 3.2.5 Documenting uncertainty and interpreting listings ..................................................................... 23 3.2.6 Uncertainty and the application of the categories Data Deficient and Near Threatened ........... 24 4. DEFINITIONS OF TERMS USED IN THE CRITERIA AND THEIR CALCULATION .............. 24 4.1 POPULATION AND POPULATION SIZE (CRITERIA A, C AND D) ................................................................ 24 4.2 SUBPOPULATIONS (CRITERIA B AND C) ................................................................................................. 24 4.3 MATURE INDIVIDUALS (CRITERIA A, B, C AND D) ................................................................................. 25 4.3.1 Notes on defining mature individuals .......................................................................................... 25 4.3.2 Clonal colonial organisms, such as most corals, algae, bryophytes, fungi and some vascular plants ........................................................................................................................................... 26 4.3.3 Fishes .......................................................................................................................................... 28 4.3.4 Sex-changing organisms ............................................................................................................. 28 4.3.5 Trees ............................................................................................................................................ 28 4.4 GENERATION (CRITERIA A, C1 AND E) .................................................................................................. 28 4.5 REDUCTION (CRITERION A) ................................................................................................................... 31 4.5.1 Calculating population reduction using statistical methods ....................................................... 31 4.5.2 Calculating population reduction using population models ....................................................... 36 4.5.3 Taxa with widely distributed or multiple subpopulations ........................................................... 37 4.5.4 Estimating overall reduction ....................................................................................................... 38 4.5.5 Dealing with uncertainty ............................................................................................................. 41 4.6 CONTINUING DECLINE (CRITERIA B AND C) ........................................................................................... 43 4.7 EXTREME FLUCTUATIONS (CRITERIA B AND C2) ................................................................................... 44 4.8 SEVERELY FRAGMENTED (CRITERION B) ............................................................................................... 47 4.9 EXTENT OF OCCURRENCE (CRITERIA A AND B) ...................................................................................... 48 4.10 AREA OF OCCUPANCY (CRITERIA A, B AND D) ...................................................................................... 51 4.10.1 Problems of scale ........................................................................................................................ 52 4.10.2 Methods for estimating AOO....................................................................................................... 53 4.10.3 The appropriate scale ................................................................................................................. 53 4.10.4 Scale-area relationships .............................................................................................................. 54 4.10.5 Scale correction factors .............................................................................................................. 55 4.10.6 "Linear" habitat .......................................................................................................................... 56 4.10.7 AOO and EOO based on habitat maps and models .................................................................... 57 4.10.8 Effect of sampling effort and detectability on estimates of AOO................................................. 59 4.10.9 Complementarity of AOO, EOO and number of locations .......................................................... 60 4.11 LOCATION (CRITERIA B AND D) ............................................................................................................. 60 4.12 QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS (CRITERION E) .............................................................................................. 61 5. GUIDELINES FOR APPLYING CRITERION A ............................................................................... 61 Red List Guidelines 3 5.1 THE BASIS OF REDUCTIONS .................................................................................................................... 63 5.2 THE USE OF TIME CAPS IN CRITERION A ................................................................................................. 65 5.3 HOW TO APPLY CRITERION A4 ............................................................................................................... 65 5.4 REDUCTION FOLLOWED BY SHORT-TERM STABILIZATION OR INCREASE: THE 'SKI-JUMP' EFFECT ........... 66 5.5 HISTORICAL REDUCTION FOLLOWED BY LONG-TERM STABILIZATION: SEVERELY DEPLETED POPULATIONS......................................................................................................................................... 66 5.6 FISHERIES .............................................................................................................................................. 67 5.6.1 Fisheries management and extinction risk .................................................................................. 67 5.6.2 Technical aspects of using criterion A for fisheries .................................................................... 68 5.7 LONG-LIVED TAXA ................................................................................................................................ 68 5.8 RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LOSS OF HABITAT AND POPULATION REDUCTION ........................................... 68 6. GUIDELINES
Load more

Recommended publications
  • SDG Indicator Metadata (Harmonized Metadata Template - Format Version 1.0)
    Last updated: 4 January 2021 SDG indicator metadata (Harmonized metadata template - format version 1.0) 0. Indicator information 0.a. Goal Goal 15: Protect, restore and promote sustainable use of terrestrial ecosystems, sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, and halt and reverse land degradation and halt biodiversity loss 0.b. Target Target 15.5: Take urgent and significant action to reduce the degradation of natural habitats, halt the loss of biodiversity and, by 2020, protect and prevent the extinction of threatened species 0.c. Indicator Indicator 15.5.1: Red List Index 0.d. Series 0.e. Metadata update 4 January 2021 0.f. Related indicators Disaggregations of the Red List Index are also of particular relevance as indicators towards the following SDG targets (Brooks et al. 2015): SDG 2.4 Red List Index (species used for food and medicine); SDG 2.5 Red List Index (wild relatives and local breeds); SDG 12.2 Red List Index (impacts of utilisation) (Butchart 2008); SDG 12.4 Red List Index (impacts of pollution); SDG 13.1 Red List Index (impacts of climate change); SDG 14.1 Red List Index (impacts of pollution on marine species); SDG 14.2 Red List Index (marine species); SDG 14.3 Red List Index (reef-building coral species) (Carpenter et al. 2008); SDG 14.4 Red List Index (impacts of utilisation on marine species); SDG 15.1 Red List Index (terrestrial & freshwater species); SDG 15.2 Red List Index (forest-specialist species); SDG 15.4 Red List Index (mountain species); SDG 15.7 Red List Index (impacts of utilisation) (Butchart 2008); and SDG 15.8 Red List Index (impacts of invasive alien species) (Butchart 2008, McGeoch et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Critically Endangered - Wikipedia
    Critically endangered - Wikipedia Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Article Talk Read Edit View history Critically endangered From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Main page Contents This article is about the conservation designation itself. For lists of critically endangered species, see Lists of IUCN Red List Critically Endangered Featured content species. Current events A critically endangered (CR) species is one which has been categorized by the International Union for Random article Conservation status Conservation of Nature (IUCN) as facing an extremely high risk of extinction in the wild.[1] Donate to Wikipedia by IUCN Red List category Wikipedia store As of 2014, there are 2464 animal and 2104 plant species with this assessment, compared with 1998 levels of 854 and 909, respectively.[2] Interaction Help As the IUCN Red List does not consider a species extinct until extensive, targeted surveys have been About Wikipedia conducted, species which are possibly extinct are still listed as critically endangered. IUCN maintains a list[3] Community portal of "possibly extinct" CR(PE) and "possibly extinct in the wild" CR(PEW) species, modelled on categories used Recent changes by BirdLife International to categorize these taxa. Contact page Contents Tools Extinct 1 International Union for Conservation of Nature definition What links here Extinct (EX) (list) 2 See also Related changes Extinct in the Wild (EW) (list) 3 Notes Upload file Threatened Special pages 4 References Critically Endangered (CR) (list) Permanent
    [Show full text]
  • Table 5: Threatened Species in Each Country (Totals by Taxonomic Group)
    IUCN Red List version 2020-1: Table 5 Last updated: 19 March 2020 Table 5: Threatened species in each country (totals by taxonomic group) * Reptiles, fishes, molluscs, other invertebrates, plants, fungi & protists: please note that for these groups, there are still many species that have not yet been assessed for the IUCN Red List and therefore their status is not known (i.e., these groups have not yet been completely assessed). Therefore the figures presented below for these groups should be interpreted as the number of species known to be threatened within those species that have been assessed to date, and not as the overall total number of threatened species for each group. AFRICA Other Fungi & North Africa Mammals Birds Reptiles* Amphibians Fishes* Molluscs* Plants* Total* Inverts* Protists* Algeria 14 15 8 3 45 12 30 26 2 155 Egypt 18 14 13 0 62 1 56 8 0 172 Libya 10 8 6 0 38 1 4 8 0 75 Morocco 18 18 13 2 55 38 33 56 5 238 Tunisia 14 11 6 1 42 8 13 10 2 107 Western Sahara 10 5 1 0 39 2 1 0 0 58 Other Fungi & Sub-Saharan Africa Mammals Birds Reptiles* Amphibians Fishes* Molluscs* Plants* Total* Inverts* Protists* Angola 22 33 7 0 55 7 4 43 0 171 Benin 16 12 7 1 46 2 1 21 0 106 Botswana 11 16 1 0 2 0 0 3 0 33 Burkina Faso 11 12 3 0 4 1 0 5 0 36 Burundi 16 14 0 1 17 3 3 134 0 188 Cabo Verde 4 7 6 0 38 13 0 51 0 119 Cameroon 47 29 13 57 126 13 13 592 0 890 Central African Republic 19 16 5 0 4 0 0 29 0 73 Chad 16 16 5 0 1 4 0 6 0 48 Comoros 5 14 5 0 17 0 77 9 0 127 Congo 18 7 6 1 60 7 0 56 0 155 Congo, The Democratic Republic of the 42
    [Show full text]
  • Short Note Preliminary Survey of the Bird Assemblage at Tanjong Mentong, Lake Kenyir, Hulu Terengganu, Malaysia
    Tropical Natural History 15(1): 87-90, April 2015 2015 by Chulalongkorn University Short Note Preliminary Survey of the Bird Assemblage at Tanjong Mentong, Lake Kenyir, Hulu Terengganu, Malaysia 1,2* 3 MUHAMMAD HAFIZ SULAIMAN , MUHAMMAD EMBONG , MAZRUL A. 2 4 4 MAMAT , NURUL FARAH DIYANA A. TAHIR , NURSHILAWATI A. LATIP , 4 4 RAFIK MURNI AND M. ISHAM M. AZHAR 1 Institute of Kenyir Research, 2 School of Marine Science and Environment, 3 School of Fundamental Science, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu, 21030 Kuala Terengganu, Terengganu, MALAYSIA 4 Fakulti Sains & Teknologi Sumber, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, 94300 Kota Samarahan, Sarawak, MALAYSIA * Corresponding Author: Muhammad Hafiz Sulaiman ([email protected]/ [email protected]) Received: 6 July 2014; Accepted: 2 March 2015 Malaysia has 789 bird species recorded above the ground. Mist-nets were tended by Avibase1, while2 lists 695 species. More every 2–3 h from 0730 until 1930. The total than 40 bird species are considered as trapping efforts were 49 net-days. All endemic to Malaysia and are mostly found captured birds were identified following6,7,8. in Sabah and Sarawak3. At least 45 species A total of 21 individual birds comprised were classified as endangered largely due to of 12 species belonging to 10 families and habitat degradation and illegal poaching2,3,4. 11 genera were recorded during the To date, 55 IBA areas covering 5,135,645 sampling period (Table 1). Of the 10 ha (51, 356 km2) have been identified in families of birds recorded, only one species Malaysia2 including Taman Negara was represented per family except for (National Park) includes Kenyir Lake (Tasik Nectariniidae and Dicaeidae with two Kenyir).
    [Show full text]
  • Complete Index of Common Names: Supplement to Tropical Timbers of the World (AH 607)
    Complete Index of Common Names: Supplement to Tropical Timbers of the World (AH 607) by Nancy Ross Preface Since it was published in 1984, Tropical Timbers of the World has proven to be an extremely valuable reference to the properties and uses of tropical woods. It has been particularly valuable for the selection of species for specific products and as a reference for properties information that is important to effective pro- cessing and utilization of several hundred of the most commercially important tropical wood timbers. If a user of the book has only a common or trade name for a species and wishes to know its properties, the user must use the index of common names beginning on page 451. However, most tropical timbers have numerous common or trade names, depending upon the major region or local area of growth; furthermore, different species may be know by the same common name. Herein lies a minor weakness in Tropical Timbers of the World. The index generally contains only the one or two most frequently used common or trade names. If the common name known to the user is not one of those listed in the index, finding the species in the text is impossible other than by searching the book page by page. This process is too laborious to be practical because some species have 20 or more common names. This supplement provides a complete index of common or trade names. This index will prevent a user from erroneously concluding that the book does not contain a specific species because the common name known to the user does not happen to be in the existing index.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversification of Tree Crops: Domestication of Companion Crops for Poverty Reduction and Environmental Services
    Expl Agric. (2001), volume 37, pp. 279±296 Printed in Great Britain Copyright # 2001 Cambridge University Press REVIEW PAPER DIVERSIFICATION OF TREE CROPS: DOMESTICATION OF COMPANION CROPS FOR POVERTY REDUCTION AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES By R. R. B. LEAKEY{ and Z. TCHOUNDJEU{ {Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Bush Estate, Penicuik, Midlothian, EH26 0QB, Scotland, UK and {International Centre for Research in Agroforestry, PO Box 2067, YaoundeÂ, Cameroon (Accepted 19 January 2001) SUMMARY New initiatives in agroforestry are seeking to integrate indigenous trees, whose products have traditionally been gathered from natural forests, into tropical farming systems such as cacao farms. This is being done to provide from farms, marketable timber and non-timber forest products that will enhance rural livelihoods by generating cash for resource-poor rural and peri-urban households. There are many potential candidate species for domestication that have commercial potential in local, regional or even international markets. Little or no formal research has been carried out on many of these hitherto wild species to assess potential for genetic improvement, reproductive biology or suitability for cultivation. With the participation of subsistence farmers a number of projects to bring candidate species into cultivation are in progress, however. This paper describes some tree domestication activities being carried out in southern Cameroon, especially with Irvingia gabonensis (bush mango; dika nut) and Dacryodes edulis (African plum; safoutier). As part of this, fruits and kernels from 300 D. edulis and 150 I. gabonensis trees in six villages of Cameroon and Nigeria have been quantitatively characterized for 11 traits to determine combinations de®ning multi-trait ideotypes for a genetic selection programme.
    [Show full text]
  • Improvements to the Red List Index Stuart H
    Improvements to the Red List Index Stuart H. M. Butchart1*, H. Resit Akc¸akaya2, Janice Chanson3, Jonathan E. M. Baillie4, Ben Collen4, Suhel Quader5,8, Will R. Turner6, Rajan Amin4, Simon N. Stuart3, Craig Hilton-Taylor7 1 BirdLife International, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 2 Applied Biomathematics, Setauket, New York, United States of America, 3 Conservation International/Center for Applied Biodiversity Science-World Conservation Union (IUCN)/Species Survival Commission Biodiversity Assessment Unit, IUCN Species Programme, Center for Applied Biodiversity Science, Conservation International, Washington, D. C., United States of America, 4 Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, London, United Kingdom, 5 Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 6 Center for Applied Biodiversity Science, Conservation International, Washington, D. C., United States of America, 7 World Conservation Union (IUCN) Species Programme, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 8 Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, Sandy, United Kingdom The Red List Index uses information from the IUCN Red List to track trends in the projected overall extinction risk of sets of species. It has been widely recognised as an important component of the suite of indicators needed to measure progress towards the international target of significantly reducing the rate of biodiversity loss by 2010. However, further application of the RLI (to non-avian taxa in particular) has revealed some shortcomings in the original formula and approach: It performs inappropriately when a value of zero is reached; RLI values are affected by the frequency of assessments; and newly evaluated species may introduce bias. Here we propose a revision to the formula, and recommend how it should be applied in order to overcome these shortcomings.
    [Show full text]
  • Endangered Animals
    Preparing for your Education Session: Endangered Animals Location: Rainforest Life During the session students will: Duration: 45 minutes Sit, listen and answer questions Curriculum links Look at and touch real hunted KS2 Science animal biofacts Year 4 programme of study (2014) - Living things and their Share thoughts and ideas with habitats the rest of the group. Pupils should be taught to recognise that environments can change Meet a live animal (where and that this can sometimes pose dangers to living things possible). Session content This session explores how animals can become endangered or extinct due to threats such as hunting and habitat destruction. The problems that animals face are introduced alongside examples of positive things that are people can do to help. Using the Zoo to support this session The photocopiable worksheet on the reverse of this page encourages observation of different types of animals. Look for the signs on each animal’s enclosure: these will tell you how endangered an animal is and some of the threats that it may face. B.U.G.S! shows a wide range of different animals, including Partula snails which were extinct in the wild but have now been successfully re-introduced thanks to the work of ZSL. You may wish to visit some of these critically endangered animals at the Zoo: Animal Location Partula snails B.U.G.S! Bali starling B.U.G.S! & Blackburn Pavilion Golden Lion Tamarin Rainforest Life Asian Lions Land of the Lions* Gorilla Gorilla Kingdom Radiated tortoise Reptile House Philippine crocodile Reptile House * Land of the Lions opening spring 2016 Suggested classroom activity (for before or after your visit) Children pick an endangered species to research and use their information to make an informative poster about their animal, to display to the rest of the school.
    [Show full text]
  • Lagenodelphis Hosei – Fraser's Dolphin
    Lagenodelphis hosei – Fraser’s Dolphin Assessment Rationale The species is suspected to be widespread and abundant and there have been no reported population declines or major threats identified that could cause a range-wide decline. Globally, it has been listed as Least Concern and, within the assessment region, it is not a conservation priority and therefore, the regional change from Data Deficient to Least Concern reflects the lack of major threats to the species. The most prominent threat to this species globally may be incidental capture in fishing gear and, although this is not considered a major threat to this species in the assessment region, Fraser’s Dolphins have become entangled in anti-shark nets off South Africa’s east coast. This threat should be monitored. Regional Red List status (2016) Least Concern Regional population effects: Fraser’s Dolphin has a widespread, pantropical distribution, and although its National Red List status (2004) Data Deficient seasonal migration patterns in southern Africa remain Reasons for change Non-genuine change: inconclusive, no barriers to dispersal have been New information recognised, thus rescue effects are possible. Global Red List status (2012) Least Concern TOPS listing (NEMBA) (2007) None Distribution The distribution of L. hosei is suggested to be pantropical CITES listing (2003) Appendix II (Robison & Craddock 1983), and is widespread across the Endemic No Pacific and Atlantic Oceans (Ross 1984), and the species has been documented in the Indian Ocean off South This species is occasionally Africa’s east coast (Perrin et al. 1973), in Sri Lanka misidentified as the Striped Dolphin (Stenella (Leatherwood & Reeves 1989), Madagascar (Perrin et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Threatened Species Status Assessment Manual
    THREATENED SPECIES SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE Established under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 THREATENED SPECIES STATUS ASSESSMENT MANUAL A guide to undertaking status assessments, including the preparation and submission of a status report for threatened species. Knowledge of species and their status improves continuously. Due to the large numbers of both listed and non-listed species, government resources are not generally available to carry out regular and comprehensive assessments of all listed species that are threatened or assess all non-listed species to determine their listing status. A status assessment by a group of experts, with their extensive collection of knowledge of a particular taxon or group of species could help to ensure that advice is the most current and accurate available, and provide for collective expert discussion and decisions regarding any uncertainties. The development of a status report by such groups will therefore assist in maintaining the accuracy of the list of threatened species under the EPBC Act and ensure that protection through listing is afforded to the correct species. 1. What is a status assessment? A status assessment is a assessment of the conservation status of a specific group of taxa (e.g. birds, frogs, snakes) or multiple species in a region (e.g. Sydney Basin heathland flora) that occur within Australia. For each species or subspecies (referred to as a species in this paper) assessed in a status assessment the aim is to: provide an evidence-based assessment
    [Show full text]
  • A Distinctive New Species of Flowerpecker (Passeriformes: Dicaeidae) from Borneo
    This is a repository copy of A distinctive new species of flowerpecker (Passeriformes: Dicaeidae) from Borneo. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/155358/ Version: Published Version Article: SAUCIER, J.R., MILENSKY, C.M., CARABALLO-ORTIZ, M.A. et al. (3 more authors) (2019) A distinctive new species of flowerpecker (Passeriformes: Dicaeidae) from Borneo. Zootaxa, 4686 (4). pp. 451-464. ISSN 1175-5326 10.11646/zootaxa.4686.4.1 Reuse This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) licence. This licence allows you to distribute, remix, tweak, and build upon the work, even commercially, as long as you credit the authors for the original work. More information and the full terms of the licence here: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ Zootaxa 4686 (4): 451–464 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) https://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2019 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4686.4.1 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:2C416BE7-D759-4DDE-9A00-18F1E679F9AA A distinctive new species of flowerpecker (Passeriformes: Dicaeidae) from Borneo JACOB R. SAUCIER1, CHRISTOPHER M. MILENSKY1, MARCOS A. CARABALLO-ORTIZ2, ROSLINA RAGAI3, N. FARIDAH DAHLAN1 & DAVID P. EDWARDS4 1Division of Birds, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, MRC 116, Washington, D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Read Book a Naturalists Guide to the Birds of the Philippines
    A NATURALISTS GUIDE TO THE BIRDS OF THE PHILIPPINES PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Maia Tanedo, Robert Hutchinson, Adrian Constantino, Trinket Constantino | 176 pages | 26 Nov 2015 | John Beaufoy Publishing Ltd | 9781909612495 | English | Oxford, United Kingdom : Birding Activity Females of the species lack this patch. The Bubo philippensis is an owl species that is endemic to the Philippines. Here, it is found in the lowland forests on islands like Mindanao, Luzon, Samar, Bohol, and a few others. These birds are around 40 to 50 cm long and have a wing-span of 35 cm. Although it is the largest owl in the country, it is among the smallest of owls. These birds have a rufous color but with a lighter colored underside and yellow eyes. They are nocturnal creatures that hunt for prey at night. IUCN has labeled the species as Vulnerable as it is threatened by habitat destruction in its native habitat. The Cacatua haematuropygia is a cockatoo species that is endemic to the Philippines. It has all-white plumage and pale yellow underwings. It is easily distinguished by red feathers around the vent. This bird is around 30 cm long and has a 22 cm long wingspan. These birds are social in nature and feeds, flies, and roosts in large noisy groups. Seeds, fruits, buds, nectar, etc. Unfortunately, illegal trapping of the bird for cage-bird trade has led to a dramatic decline in the population of the red-vented cockatoo. It is now a critically endangered species with a population estimated to be less than Most birds found in backyards fall into one of about 15 to 20 groups, which are divided up by categories like pigeons, woodpeckers, wrens, mockingbirds, finches and sparrows, among others.
    [Show full text]