2021 MFP List of Projects .Xlsx
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
7919-0048-00 to Permit the Development of a Mixed-Use High-Ris
City of Surrey PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT REPORT Application No.: 7919-0048-00 Planning Report Date: June 15, 2020 PROPOSAL: • OCP Amendment of Figure 16: Central Business District Densities from "3.5 FAR" to "7.5 FAR" • City Centre Plan Amendment from "Mixed Use 3.5 FAR" to "Mixed Use 7.5 FAR" • Rezoning from C-8, C-15 and CHI to CD • Development Permit to permit the development of a mixed-use high-rise building. LOCATION: 10732 - 135A Street 10731 - King George Boulevard 10751 - King George Boulevard ZONING: C-8, C-15 and CHI OCP DESIGNATION: Town Centre CITY CENTRE PLAN Mixed Use 3.5 FAR DESIGNATION: Staff Report to Council Planning & Development Report Application No.: 7919-0048-00 Page 2 RECOMMENDATION SUMMARY • By-law Introduction and set date for Public Hearing for: • OCP Amendment; and • Rezoning. • Approval to draft Development Permit for Form and Character. DEVIATION FROM PLANS, POLICIES OR REGULATIONS • Proposing an amendment to the Official Community Plan (Figure 16) to permit a higher density for the site. • Proposing an amendment to the City Centre Plan from Mixed Use 3.5 FAR to Mixed-Use 7.5 FAR. RATIONALE OF RECOMMENDATION • The proposed density and building form are appropriate for this part of Surrey City Centre, and forms part of an emerging high-density mixed-use hub that will be complementary to the City of Surrey Civic Centre to the south. • The proposed development conforms to the goal of achieving high-rise, high density, and mixed-use development around the three City Centre SkyTrain Stations. The Gateway SkyTrain Station is located within a walking distance of 400 metres of the subject site. -
Exploring Changes to Cycle Infrastructure to Improve the Experience of Cycling for Families
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by UWE Bristol Research Repository Exploring changes to cycle infrastructure to improve the experience of cycling for families Dr William Clayton1 Dr Charles Musselwhite Centre for transport and Society Centre for Innovative Ageing Faculty of Environment and Technology School of Human and Health Sciences University of the West of England Swansea University Bristol, UK Swansea, UK BS16 1QY SA2 8PP Tel: +44 (0)1792 518696 Tel: +44 (0) 117 32 82316 Web: www.drcharliemuss.com Email: [email protected] Twitter: @charliemuss Website: www.uwe.ac.uk/et/research/cts Email: [email protected] KEYWORDS: Cycling, infrastructure, motivation, families, behaviour change. Abstract: Positive changes to the immediate cycling environment can improve the cycling experience through increasing levels of safety, but little is known about how the intrinsic benefits of cycling might be enhanced beyond this. This paper presents research which has studied the potential benefits of changing the infrastructure within a cycle network – here the National Cycle Network (NCN) in the United Kingdom (UK) – to enhance the intrinsic rewards of cycling. The rationale in this approach is that this could be a motivating factor in encouraging greater use of the cycle network, and consequently help in promoting cycling and active travel more generally amongst family groups. The project involved in-depth research with 64 participants, which included family interviews, self-documented family cycle rides, and school focus groups. The findings suggest that improvements to the cycling environment can help maintain ongoing motivation for experienced cycling families by enhancing novel aspects of a routine journey, creating enjoyable activities and facilitating other incidental experiences along the course of a route, and improving the kinaesthetic experience of cycling. -
February 2015 Issue
PAGE 1 JANUARY 2015 GrapeVine RIDGE MEADOWS SENIORS SOCIETY– MAPLE RIDGE & PITT MEADOWS February 2015 Issue Photo Maple Ridge Seniors Activity Centre Pitt Meadows Seniors Centre 12150 224th Street 19065 119B Ave Maple Ridge, BC V2X 3N8 Pitt Meadows, BC V3Y 0E6 604-467-4993 604-457-4771 RMSS- Maple Ridge, 12150 224th www.rmssseniors.orgStreet Maple Ridge BC V2X 3N8 Tel. (604)467-4993 Web: www.rmssseniors.org RMSS- Pitt Meadows, 19065 119B Ave Pitt Meadows BC V3Y 1XK Tel. (604)457-4771 PAGE 2 JANUARY 2015 BUS TRIPS Chinese New Year St Patrick's Day Parade & Pub Lunch February 22nd- $79 March 15 -$79 The exciting, fun-filled event The 11th Anniversary St. Patrick’s features lion dances, marching Day Parade draws people from all bands, parade floats, martial arts cultures, backgrounds, performances, cultural dance ages and all walks of life to this troupes, firecrackers, and more. colourful (very green) display of The parade includes over 3,000 fabulous sight and sounds. people from various cultural and community groups in Vancouver, Enjoy a traditional pub lunch at and also features the largest Steamworks Brew Pub in Gastown congregation of lion dance teams and visit the Celtic Village and Street in Canada. The colourful and ener- Market in Robson getic lions are just one of the many Square for a dizzying array of Celtic highlights of the parade each year treasures and the works of gifted attracting more than 50,000 s artisans. Friends and pectators annually. Experience families can gather and wander, authentic Chinese multi course soaking in that special Celtic feeling lunch at the very popular restau- with music, fun and frolic, food -- rant Peaceful Restaurant recently and shopping! featured on the Food Network's Pitt Meadows, 9:15am - 4:15pm. -
East-West Lower Mainland Routes
Commercial Vehicle Safety and Enforcement EAST-WEST OVERHEIGHT CORRIDORS IN THE LOWER MAINLAND East-west Lower Mainland Routes for overall heights greater than 4.3 m up to 4.88 m Note that permits from the Provincial Permit Centre, including Form CVSE1010, are for travel on provincial roads. Transporters must contact individual municipalities for routing and authorizations within municipal jurisdictions. ROUTE A: TSAWWASSEN ↔ HOPE Map shows Route A Eastbound EASTBOUND Over 4.3 m: Tsawwassen Ferry Terminal, Highway 17, Highway 91 Connector, Nordel Way, Highway 91, Highway 10, Langley Bypass, Highway 1A (Fraser Highway), turn right on Highway 13 (264 Street), turn left on 8 Avenue (Vye Road), turn left on Highway 11 and enter Highway 1 (see * and **), continue on Highway 1 to Hope, Highway 5 (Coquihalla). * If over 4.5 m: Exit Highway 1 at No. 3 Road off-ramp (Exit # 104, located at ‘B’ on the map above), travel up and over and re-enter Highway 1 at No. 3 Road on-ramp; and ** If over 4.8 m: Exit Highway 1 at Lickman Road off-ramp (Exit # 116, located at ‘C’ on the map above), travel up and over and re-enter Highway 1 at Lickman Road on-ramp. WESTBOUND Over 4.3 m: Highway 5 (Coquihalla), Highway 1 (see ‡ and ‡‡), exit Highway 1 at Highway 11 (Exit # 92), turn left onto Highway 11 at first traffic light, turn right on 8 Avenue (Vye Road), turn right on Highway 13 (264 Street), turn left on Highway 1A (Fraser Highway), follow Langley Bypass, Highway 10, Highway 91, Nordel Way, Highway 91 Connector, Highway 17 to Tsawwassen Ferry Terminal. -
Mayor and Council From
City of Delta COUNCIL REPORT F.07 Regular Meeting To: Mayor and Council From: Corporate Services Department Date: February 21, 2018 George Massey Tunnel Replacement Project Update The following recommendations have been endorsed by the Acting City Manager. • RECOMMENDATION: THAT copies of this report be provided to: • Honourable Marc Garneau, Minister of Transport • Honourable Carla Qualtrough, Member of Parliament for Delta • Chief Bryce Williams, Tsawwassen First Nation • Honourable Claire Trevena, Minister of Transportation & Infrastructure • Ravi Kahlon, MLA Delta-North • Ian Paton, MLA Delta-South • Metro Vancouver Board of Directors • Mayors' Council on Regional Transportation • PURPOSE: The purpose of this report is to provide an update on some of the key issues related to the George Massey Tunnel Replacement Project (GMTRP), particularly in light of the Province's recent announcement regarding the Pattullo Bridge, and to provide a consolidated summary for Council's information. • BACKGROUND: On February 16, 2018, the BC government announced that it is moving forward with the construction of a $1.38 billion bridge to replace the Pattullo Bridge. This raises some questions regarding the George Massey Tunnel Replacement Project, which has been on a five-month hiatus since the Province announced last September that it was undertaking an independent technical review of the crossing. Both projects are badly needed; however, unlike the Pattullo project which is only part-way through the environmental assessment process, the tunnel replacement project is shovel-ready, has received its environmental assessment certificate and has completed the bidding process. Furthermore, in terms of both vehicular and transit traffic, the George Massey Tunnel carries Page 2 of 5 GMTRP Update February 21 , 2018 significantly higher volumes than the Pattullo Bridge (Attachments 'A' and 'B' show the volumes for all the Fraser River crossings). -
Seismic Design of Bridges in British Columbia: Ten-Year Review
SEISMIC DESIGN OF BRIDGES IN BRITISH COLUMBIA: TEN-YEAR REVIEW Jamie McINTYRE Structural Engineer, Hatch Mott MacDonald, Vancouver Canada [email protected] Marc GÉRIN Consultant, Ottawa Canada [email protected] Casey LEGGETT Structural Engineer, Hatch Mott MacDonald, Vancouver Canada [email protected] ABSTRACT: Seismic design of bridges in British Columbia has evolved significantly in the last ten years. Developments have comprised three major changes in seismic design practice: (1) improved understanding of seismic hazard—including raising the design earthquake from a 475-year return period to 2475-year return period and better knowledge of the contribution of the nearby Cascadia subduction zone; (2) a shift to a performance-based design philosophy with emphasis on improved post-earthquake performance—including multiple service and damage objectives for multiple levels of ground motions; and (3) increased sophistication of seismic analyses—including both inertial analyses and analyses for liquefaction hazards. The result of these changes should be bridges that perform better and remain functional post-earthquake. These changes are expected to encourage alternatives to the traditional use of column plastic hinging, such as base-isolation. Over the last ten years, base-isolation has been used on few bridges in British Columbia—primarily retrofits of existing structures; however, given its ability to preserve post-earthquake functionality, base-isolation should be a serious consideration for any project. 1. Introduction – Evolution of Seismic Design Practice Seismic design of bridges in British Columbia has evolved significantly in the last ten years, going from a bridge design code using outdated principles to a state of the art new code that implements performance- based design. -
Special Commission Skytrain Extension Review Final Report May, 1999 Acknowledgements
Special Commission SkyTrain Extension Review Final Report May, 1999 Acknowledgements The Special Commissioner gratefully acknowledges the generous and dedicated support and advice of the agencies, organizations and individuals that contributed to the Special Commission SkyTrain Review. The cooperation and assistance of the Greater Vancouver Transportation Authority (TransLink); Greater Vancouver Regional District; City of Vancouver; City of New Westminster; City of Burnaby; City of Coquitlam; City of Port Moody; Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency; Fisheries and Oceans Canada; Environment Canada; Health Canada; Canadian Coast Guard; BC Transportation Financing Authority; BC Assets and Land Corporation; Simon Fraser Health Region; and BC Ministries of Environment, Lands and Parks, Transportation and Highways, Municipal Affairs, Small Business, Tourism and Culture were instrumental to the work of the Special Commission. The cooperation of the BC Environmental Assessment Office in providing considerable technical and administrative resources and support is greatly appreciated. In addition, the Special Commissioner particularly wishes to thank the members of the public and organizations who made submissions or participated in the workshops or public meetings for their efforts in the public interest. Staff Seconded to Special Commission David Johns, Kim Fawthorpe, Michael Price, Paul Finkel, Alan Calder, Mel Turner, Jennifer Kay, Tami Payne, Shari Steinbach, Sylvia Hinks, Eileen Bennett, Tanya Paz, and Joy Cohen. Environmental Assessment -
MVRD Parks Board Meeting Agenda
Meeting 1 of 9 METRO VANCOUVER REGIONAL DISTRICT (MVRD) - PARKS BOARD OF DIRECTORS REGULAR BOARD MEETING Friday, June 23, 2017 9:00 A.M. 2nd Floor Boardroom, 4330 Kingsway, Burnaby, British Columbia Membership and Votes A G E N D A1 A. ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA 1. June 23, 2017 Regular Parks Meeting Agenda That the MVRD Board adopt the agenda for its regular Parks meeting scheduled for June 23, 2017 as circulated. B. ADOPTION OF THE MINUTES 1. May 26, 2017 Regular Parks Meeting Minutes That the MVRD Board adopt the minutes for its regular Parks meeting held May 26, 2017 as circulated. C. DELEGATIONS D. INVITED PRESENTATIONS E. CONSENT AGENDA Note: Directors may adopt in one motion all recommendations appearing on the Consent Agenda or, prior to the vote, request an item be removed from the Consent Agenda for debate or discussion, voting in opposition to a recommendation, or declaring a conflict of interest with an item. 1. REGIONAL PARKS COMMITTEE REPORTS 1.1 Derby Reach Regional Park—Langley Bog Viewing Platform Dedication That the MVRD Board approve the dedication of the new Langley Bog Viewing Platform in Derby Reach Regional Park to citizen leader Bays Blackhall. 1 Note: Recommendation is shown under each item, where applicable. June 14, 2017 Metro Vancouver Regional District - Parks - 1 MVRD Board Agenda - Parks June 23, 2017 Agenda Page 2 of 2 1.2 Colony Farm Regional Park - Fraser River Trade Area Multi-Modal Transportation Network Planning Study and Implications That the MVRD Board direct staff to write a letter to the Chair of the Gateway Transportation Collaborative Forum Steering Committee expressing concerns and potential impacts to Colony Farm Regional Park from proposed projects identified in the Fraser River Trade Area Multi-Modal Transportation Network Planning Study. -
KING GEORGE BOULEVARD 10070 SURREY, BC Partnership
FOR LEASE KING GEORGE BOULEVARD 10070 SURREY, BC Partnership. Performance. OFFICE SPACE FOR LEASE Opportunity to lease in the heart of central Surrey with direct exposure along King George Boulevard. Josh Sookero*, Principal Nicolas Bilodeau, Senior Associate 604.647.5091 604.647.1336 [email protected] [email protected] * Personal Real Estate Corporation Jordan Gill, Associate 604.647.5097 [email protected] KING GEORGE BLVD BARNET HWY E HASTINGS ST RENFREW ST HASTINGS ST SURREY, BC ST JOHNS ST 10070 W 4 AVE CLARKE RD W BROADWAY KINGSWAY NANAIMO ST E BROADWAY W 16 AVE RUPERT ST GAGLARDI WAY SW MARINE DR W KING EDWARD AVE KNIGHT ST LOUGHEED HWY W 41 AVE W 41 AVE KINGSWAY W 49 AVE KNIGHT ST Subject Property GROSVENOR RD BRIDGEPORT RD 10070 King George Blvd104 AVE KING GEORGE BLVD 104 AVE 120 ST 152 ST 156 ST GOLDEN EARS WAY 96 AVE 96 AVE 96 AVE 96 AVE 208 ST SOUTH FRASER PERIMETER ROAD 200 ST WESTMINSTER HWY WESTMINSTER HWY FRASER HIGHWAY 88 AVE 88 AVE 88 AVE 88 AVE TRANS-CANADA HIGHWAY 88 AVE 200 ST 168 ST BLUNDELL RD NORDEL WAY 156 ST TRANS-CANADA HIGHWAY SCOTT ROAD SCOTT 128 ST 132 ST 140 ST 144 ST HARVIE RD NO 1 RD NO 2 RD NO 3 RD NO 4 RD NO 6 RD TRANS-CANADA HIGHWAY 208 ST 152 ST 184 ST RIVER RD KING GEORGE BLVD FRASER HIGHWAY STEVESTON HWY 72 AVE 72 AVE 72 AVE 264 ST 168 ST 200 ST 64 AVE 64 AVE 64 AVE 64 AVE 64 AVE 184 ST 128 ST 132 ST 120 ST 144 ST 104 ST 232 ST 216 ST 56 AVE LANGLEY BYPASS 56 AVE 152 ST 248 ST TRANS-CANADA HIGHWAY FRASER HIGHWAY LADNER TRUNK RD 200 ST 208 ST 168 ST 184 ST 216 ST 192 ST Location ARTHUR DR 152 ST th nd TRANS-CANADA HIGHWAY 232 ST Town Square is located mid-block between 100 Avenue and 102 Avenue on 36 AVE 224 ST 240 ST 248 ST DELTAPORT WAY 32 AVE 32 AVE 144 ST FRASER HIGHWAY 216 ST the east side of King George Boulevard in central Surrey. -
Highway 17 and 69 Controlled Access Highway Response
Sudbury Cyclists Union March 28, 2014 Re: Route Planning Study, Highway 17 from Sudbury to Markstay and Highway 69 from the Estaire Road Interchange to Highway 17 The Sudbury Cyclists Union (SCU) has serious concerns about how the implementation of controlled access highways have affected cyclists in the Sudbury region. We also have some specific concerns about the implementation of this project as it relates to the safety of cyclists. The intent of all provincial roadwork is to improve the safety of its users. Traditionally, the focus has been on the safety of motorized traffic. The safety of pedestrians and cyclists has been long neglected on our highways. On page 2.1 of your “Study Design Report”, you note that to “promote a multimodal transportation network” is a key provincial responsibility” as is to “be a leader in road safety”. The sole intent of implementing controlled access highways is to facilitate the safe movement of motorized traffic. While implementing such highways draws dangerous traffic away from more local routes that are used by cyclists, alternative safe and convenient routes for cyclists are often an afterthought and are not an integral part of the planning process. An example is the Highway 69 corridor leading south from the City of Greater Sudbury that has been built without guaranteeing an alternative right of way for cyclists wishing to travel south. This controlled access highway has closed off access for non-motorized users to several towns and tourist areas, including the town of Killarney and the iconic Killarney Provincial Park. In other provinces, in particular in Western Canada, major motor routes similar to our controlled highways have paved shoulders that are used by cyclists. -
Planning for Active Transportation in the Western United States: an Alternative Future for Cache Valley, Utah
Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU All Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate Studies 8-2018 Planning for Active Transportation in the Western United States: An Alternative Future for Cache Valley, Utah Stephanie A. Tomlin Utah State University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd Part of the Environmental Design Commons, and the Landscape Architecture Commons Recommended Citation Tomlin, Stephanie A., "Planning for Active Transportation in the Western United States: An Alternative Future for Cache Valley, Utah" (2018). All Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 7195. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/7195 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. PLANNING FOR ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION IN THE WESTERN UNITED STATES: AN ALTERNATIVE FUTURE FOR CACHE VALLEY, UTAH by Stephanie A. Tomlin A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE in Bioregional Planning Approved: Bartlett Warren-Kretzschmar, Ph.D. Richard Toth, M.L.A. Major Professor Committee Member Jordy Guth, M.S. Mark R. McLellan, Ph.D. Committee Member Vice President for Research and Dean of the School of Graduate Studies UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY Logan, Utah 2018 ii Copyright © Stephanie A. Tomlin, 2018 All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT Planning for Active Transportation in the Western United States: An Alternative Future for Cache Valley, Utah by Stephanie A. Tomlin, Master of Bioregional Planning Utah State University, 2018 Major Professor: Bartlett (Barty) Warren-Kretzschmar, Ph.D. -
A Feasibility Study of GIS-Based Analyses of Cycling Infrastructure
Build it: A Feasibility Study of GIS-Based Analyses of Cycling Infrastructure A thesis submitted by Ian Thistle In partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Urban and Environmental Policy and Planning Tufts University February 2016 Adviser: Mary Davis Reader: Barbara Parmenter Table of Contents List of Figures ...................................................................................... iv List of Tables ........................................................................................ v Abstract .................................................................................................. vi Acknowledgements ................................................................................. vii Chapter 1: Introduction ............................................................................ 1 Chapter 2: Literature Review.................................................................... 4 Benefits of Cycling ................................................................................ 4 How can cities influence mode choice towards biking? ......................... 6 Evaluating Road Infrastructure for Cycling ............................................ 9 Analysis of Street Networks: “Build it! But Where?” ............................ 13 Chapter 3: Methods ............................................................................... 17 Step 1: Selecting the comparison methodologies ............................... 19 Step 2: Selecting the sample .............................................................