Control of Insect Pests with Entomopathogenic Nematodes

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Control of Insect Pests with Entomopathogenic Nematodes CONTROL OF INSECT PESTS WITH ENTOMOPATHOGENIC NEMATODES I. Control of Weevils with Entomopathogenic Nematodes Kirk A. Smith biosys Palo Alto, California U.S.A. ABSTRACT Entomopathogenic nematodes in the genus Steinernema and Heterorhabditis have been suc- cessfully commercialized as biological control agents for a variety of curculionid species. Nema- tode-based products have been introduced for: 1) root weevils, Otiorhynchus spp. 2) billbugs, Sphenophorus spp. 3) the apopka weevil, Diaprepes abbreviatus, and 4) the citrus root weevil, Pachnaeus litus. Several other Curculionidae species and other closely related families are potential candidates for future commercial introductions. INTRODUCTION government, universities and industry to overcome some of these technical difficulties (Smith et al. 1992). Gaugler and Kaya (1990) recently published a There are now three major biotechnology companies complete review of current knowledge of that have been successful in introducing nematode- entomopathogenic nematodes. Klein (1990) gave a based products into some commercial and consumer condensed introduction regarding nematode efficacy markets. to the order Insecta. The intent of this paper is to provide a brief overview of entomopathogenic Production nematode efficacy against weevils, and the recent technological developments which have made Since their discovery as biological control possible the commercial success of nematode-based agents, nematodes have been produced in vivo, with products. an insect host serving as the media for nematode- Entomopathogenic nematodes in the genus bacterial growth and production. This method has Steinernema and Heterorhabditis and their limitations, because it requires a constant source of associated bacteria (Xenorhabdus spp.) have been healthy insects. It is also sensitive to biological successfully commercialized as biological control variation, and costs of production are high in terms agents for a variety of curculionid species. They can of equipment and man-hours. More efficient methods kill hosts rapidly, are easy to apply, and are exempted of production using in vitro methods have recently from federal and local registration requirements in been developed. Steinernema spp. are now most countries because of their safety to mammals commercially produced in monoxenic liquid culture and plants (Georgis et al. 1991). Difficulties in systems that use fermentation tank technology. This production, storage, formulation, quality control, approach is the most economical of all known methods. and application technology limited their commercial Nematode production is taking place in tanks of up success in the past. Recent public pressure to limit to 80,000 liters in volume, which has lowered costs environmental contamination associated with considerably, allowing successful introductions into chemical insecticide use has resulted in a dramatic markets requiring large numbers of nematodes or increase in research conducted by scientists in markets of low cash crop value. Keywords: billbugs, biological control, entomopathogenic nematodes, weevils, 1 Formulation Efficacy The successful market introduction of an Steinernematids and heterorhabditids differ in entomopathogenic nematode based-product host seeking behavior, tolerance to environmental requires a reliable and stable formulation. This has parameters, behavior in the soil and pathogenicity to been a difficult task, because most larger markets are various insect species (Gaugler 1988). The success demanding a product with a minimum shelf-life of six of entomo-pathogenic nematodes is largely due to months when stored at room temperatures (20°- the extensive amount of scientific research 25°C). Nematode products contain living animals conducted, both in the laboratory and in the field. that have certain temperature, oxygen and moisture Probably the most studied group of weevil requirements necessary for their survival and pest species are the so-called root weevils such as effectiveness as control agents. While no nematode black vine weevil, Otiorhynchus sulcatus, and formulation has been completely successful in strawberry root weevil, O. ovatus. These insects are reaching these goals, some have come very close serious pests on several crops throughout western (Georgis 1992). Europe, and North America. Table 1 summarizes several field studies of black vine weevil in Application Technology containerized ornamental plants supervised by the biosys company. Our experience with this insect has Strategies must also be developed which insure shown that rates of 7.5x109 nematodes per hectare are the successful delivery of the nematode to the target necessary for consistent control. Both S. site and target insect, thereby increasing the carpocapsae and H. bacteriophora under probability of nematode-insect interaction. This has appropriate environmental conditions give control not been a simple task. Many parameters must be equal to, or better than, registered insecticides when investigated to improve performance. Determining targeted against the immature life stages. In North target insect life-stage susceptibility is critical, since America, Helix and BioSafe-N (S. carpocapsae) are different life stages of different species are not equally sold commercially for use on cranberry. BioVector is susceptible. Research by the biosys company has sold for other berry crops and also mint, while Exhibit shown that pest population levels and behavior have is sold for use on ornamental plants. Several thousand a great influence on nematode performance and must hectares have been treated to date. be considered carefully (unpublished data). Often, Table 2 shows data on the pathogenicity of larval stages of insects such as borers are not various Steinernema spp. against neonate larvae of accessible to nematodes. Selecting the most black vine weevil (Shanks, unpublished data). Other appropriate nematode species and/or strain is studies have shown that all larval and pupal stages important for efficacy and commercial development. are susceptible. Abiotic factors such as soil type, soil temperature Billbugs, Sphenophorus spp., have become and moisture, and biotic factors, including pathogens significant pests of turf in North America and Japan. and predators, can greatly influence the nematodes’ All immature stages are susceptible to ability to effectively kill the target pest. entomopathogenic nematodes. Table 3 summarizes Application strategies, including field dosage, field trial results of Exhibit (S. carpocapsae) against volume, irrigation and appropriate application bluegrass billbug, S. purvulus, in the United States. methods, are very important, especially if nematodes Although it was less effective on billbug populations are to be integrated with other control strategies. than the insecticide isazophos, the control effect is Compatibility with a wide range of agrichemicals has within acceptable limits. In Japan (Table 4), field trials been demonstrated (biosys, unpublished data). This conducted by SDS Biotech in cooperation with biosys has benefited the successful introduction with has displayed good levels of control against hunting existing Integrated Pest Management programs. Crop billbug, S. venatus, with BioSafe (S. carpocapsae). morphology and phenology must be considered in Adults of this species are also susceptible. These predicting whether nematodes are viable control results have made it possible to register BioSafe for candidates. Additional research has shown the commercial sale in Japan. potential for entomopathogenic nematodes to be Another commercial success story in the United used in other habitats (e.g. aquatic, foliar, and States has been the introduction of BioVector (S. cryptic), and in manure. carpocapsae) for control of the apopka weevil, Diaprepes abbreviatus, and the citrus root weevil, Pachnaeus litus. These two insects cause extensive 2 Table 1. Field efficacy of entomopathogenic nematodes against black vine weevil, Otiorhynchus sulcatus Table 2. Susceptibility of neonate black vine weevil larvae, Otiorhynchus sulcatus to various steinernematid species 3 Table 3. Field efficacy of entomopathogenic nematodes against bluegrass billbug, Sphenophorus purvulus, in the U.S.A. Table 4. Field efficacy against hunting billbug, Sphenophorus venatus venatus, in Japan root damage to citrus in the state of Florida. Thousands REFERENCES of hectares of citrus orchards and nurseries have been treated with BioVector. Tables 5a and 5b show Ahmad, R. 1974. Investigations on the white- the results of a seven-month study examining adult fringed weevils Naupactus durius Boh. insect emergence after a single, early-season and Pantomorus auripes Hustache application (Bullock, unpublished data). (Coleoptrea, Curculionidae) and their The sweetpotato weevil, Cylas formicarius, is natural enemies in Argentina. Technical a serious pest of sweet potato all over the world. Bulletin of the Commonwealth Institute of Research efforts have shown that there is a good Biological Control 17: 37-51. potential for controlling this pest with Bedding, R.A., and L.A. Miller. 1981. Use of entomopathogenic nematodes. Table 6 shows results a nematode, Heterorhabditis heliothidis, to from one recent study (Jansson et al. 1990). control black vine weevil, Otiorhynchus Table 7 lists various “weevil” pests that are sulcatus, in potted plants. Annals of reported in the literature to be susceptible to Applied Biology 99: 211-216. entomopathogenic nematodes. As previously Bélair, G.,
Recommended publications
  • Study Guide Entomology & Nematology Department
    STUDY GUIDE ENTOMOLOGY & NEMATOLOGY DEPARTMENT DPM COMPREHENSIVE EXAMINATIONS The Entomology & Nematology Comprehensive Examinations consist of 3 sections: pest identification (30%), pest biology and management (40%), and core concepts and synthesis (30%). These examinations are limited to information about invertebrate animal pests, principally insects and nematodes, but also plant feeding mites and terrestrial molluscs. A. Pest identification Students will be presented with insects, mites, molluscs, and nematodes that they must identify. Some may be recognizable by sight, but others may require keys for identification. Students will be provided with identification aids (keys), where necessary, and be expected to use them to identify the subjects accurately. The unknowns will be selected from the list of important insect, mite, mollusc, and nematode pests (Table 1) though we will emphasize those with a single or double asterisk [* or **]), as these normally are the more important pests. Included in this list are some that pose a threat but are not currently found in Florida. B. Pest biology and management Students will answer 8-10 questions on insect, mite, mollusc, and nematode pest biology (sampling, distribution, life cycle, damage) and management. The animals for which students are responsible to know biology and management are listed in Table 1 (preceded by double asterisk [**]). C. Core Concepts and Synthesis Section: Students will answer 3 or 4 questions that cover core areas of Entomology/Nematology and demonstrate knowledge of core areas, but also analysis and problem solving. Suggested reference/reading material is listed in Table 2. You might want to read through these in preparation for the Comprehensive Examinations.
    [Show full text]
  • Arthropod Pests of Citrus Roots
    lds. r at ex­ ual to ap ­ ila­ red t is een vi­ Clayton W. McCoy fa­ University of Florida ks Citrus Res ea rch and Educati on Center, Lake Alfred )0­ Ily I'::y les Ill­ up 10 Arthropod Pests of Citrus Roots 'ul r-J!l 'Ie '](1 cc The major arthropods that are injurious to plant roots are Geographical Distribution members of the classes Insecta and Acari (mites). Two-thi rds of these pests are members of the order Coleoptera (beetles), Citrus root weevi ls are predominantly trop ical ; however, a which as larvae cause serious economic loss in a wide range few temperate species are important pests in the United States, of plan t hosts. Generally, the larvae hatch from eggs laid by Chile. Argentina. Australia. and New Zealand (Table 14.1). adults on plan ts or in the soil and complete part of their life The northern blue-green citrus root weevil, Pachnaeus opalus; cycle chewing on plant roots, and in many cases as adults the Fuller rose beetle, Asynonychus godmani: and related spe ­ they feed on the foli age of the same or other host plan ts. A cies in the genus Pantomorus are found in temperate areas. Ap ­ number of arthropods inhabit the rhizosphere of citrus trees. proximately 150 species have been recorded in the Caribbean some as unique syrnbionts, but few arc injurious to the roots. region, including Florida. Central America, and South America, Only citrus root weevils. termi tes. and ants. in descending or­ feeding as larvae on the roots of all species of the genus Citrus.
    [Show full text]
  • The Beetle Fauna of Dominica, Lesser Antilles (Insecta: Coleoptera): Diversity and Distribution
    INSECTA MUNDI, Vol. 20, No. 3-4, September-December, 2006 165 The beetle fauna of Dominica, Lesser Antilles (Insecta: Coleoptera): Diversity and distribution Stewart B. Peck Department of Biology, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K1S 5B6, Canada stewart_peck@carleton. ca Abstract. The beetle fauna of the island of Dominica is summarized. It is presently known to contain 269 genera, and 361 species (in 42 families), of which 347 are named at a species level. Of these, 62 species are endemic to the island. The other naturally occurring species number 262, and another 23 species are of such wide distribution that they have probably been accidentally introduced and distributed, at least in part, by human activities. Undoubtedly, the actual numbers of species on Dominica are many times higher than now reported. This highlights the poor level of knowledge of the beetles of Dominica and the Lesser Antilles in general. Of the species known to occur elsewhere, the largest numbers are shared with neighboring Guadeloupe (201), and then with South America (126), Puerto Rico (113), Cuba (107), and Mexico-Central America (108). The Antillean island chain probably represents the main avenue of natural overwater dispersal via intermediate stepping-stone islands. The distributional patterns of the species shared with Dominica and elsewhere in the Caribbean suggest stages in a dynamic taxon cycle of species origin, range expansion, distribution contraction, and re-speciation. Introduction windward (eastern) side (with an average of 250 mm of rain annually). Rainfall is heavy and varies season- The islands of the West Indies are increasingly ally, with the dry season from mid-January to mid- recognized as a hotspot for species biodiversity June and the rainy season from mid-June to mid- (Myers et al.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Classical Biological Control of Banana Weevil Borer, Cosmopolites Sordidus (Coleoptera; Curculionidae) with Natural Enemies Fr
    Classical biological control of banana weevil borer, Cosmopolites sordidus (coleoptera; curculionidae) with natural enemies from Indonesia (With emphasis on west Sumatera) Ahsol Hasyimab, Yusdar Hilmanc aIndonesian Tropical Fruit Research Insitute Jln. Raya Aripan Km 8. Solok, 27301 Indonesia bPresent address: Indonesian Vegetable Research Institute. Jl. Tangkuban Perahu Lembang. Bandung, PO.Box 8413. Bandung 40391, Indonesia c Indonesian Center for Horticulture Research and Development, Jl. Raya Ragunan Pasar Minggu - Jakarta Selatan 12540, Indonesia Email: [email protected] Introduction General basis and protocol for classical biological control Biological control is defined as "the action of parasites (parasitoids), predators or pathogens in Maintaining another organism's population density at a lower average than would occur in their absence" (Debach 1964). Thus, biological control represents the combined effects of a natural enemy complex in suppressing pest populations. The concept of biological control arose from the observed differences in abundance of many animals and plants in their native range compared to areas in which they had been introduced in the absence of (co-evolved) natural enemies. As such, populations of introduced pests, unregulated by their natural enemies may freely multiply and rise to much higher levels than previously observed. Biological control is a component of natural control which describes environmental checks on pest buildup (Debach 1964). In agriculture, both the environment (i.e. farming systems) and natural enemies may be manipulated in an attempt to reduce pest pressure. Classical biological control concerns the search for natural enemies in a pest's area of origin, followed by quarantine and importation into locations where the pest has been introduced.
    [Show full text]
  • Hunting Billbug Sphenophorus Venatus (Coleoptera: Dryophthoridae) Adult Feeding and Attraction to Warm- and Cool- Season Turfgrasses
    The Great Lakes Entomologist Volume 53 Numbers 1 & 2 - Spring/Summer 2020 Numbers Article 8 1 & 2 - Spring/Summer 2020 Hunting Billbug Sphenophorus venatus (Coleoptera: Dryophthoridae) adult feeding and attraction to warm- and cool- season turfgrasses Alexandra Grace Duffy Brigham Young University, [email protected] Douglas S. Richmond Purdue University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Duffy, Alexandra Grace and Richmond, Douglas S. "Hunting Billbug Sphenophorus venatus (Coleoptera: Dryophthoridae) adult feeding and attraction to warm- and cool-season turfgrasses," The Great Lakes Entomologist, vol 53 (1) Available at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle/vol53/iss1/8 This Scientific Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Biology at ValpoScholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Great Lakes Entomologist by an authorized administrator of ValpoScholar. For more information, please contact a ValpoScholar staff member at [email protected]. Hunting Billbug Sphenophorus venatus (Coleoptera: Dryophthoridae) adult feeding and attraction to warm- and cool-season turfgrasses Cover Page Footnote We thank Danielle Craig and Garrett Price for field assistance. eW are grateful for the cooperation of superintendents and staff at Purdue Sports Turf and William H. Daniel Turfgrass Research and Diagnostic Center. We are grateful for the cooperation of Dr. Ian Kaplan and Ulianova Vidal Gómez for assistance with the olfactometry methods. Dr. Juli Carrillo, Dr. Laura Ingwell, and Dr. Elizabeth Long provided helpful insights on earlier versions of this manuscript. Dr. Diane Silcox Reynolds provided helpful insight and was integral in developing the initial questions during the A.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Pest Management of the Banana Weevil, Cosmopolites Sordidus (Germar), in South Africa
    Integrated pest management of the banana weevil, Cosmopolites sordidus (Germar), in South Africa by Johan de Graaf Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree Philosophiae Doctor (Entomology), in the Faculty of Natural & Agricultural Science University of Pretoria Pretoria May 2006 CONTENTS Page Summary viii List of tables xii List of figures xiv Aims xxi Hypothesis xxi Statistical analysis xxii Chapter 1: Biology, ecology and integrated pest management of the banana weevil, Cosmopolites sordidus (Germar) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), on Musa (Zingiberales: Musaceae): an evaluation of literature 1 1.1 Introduction 2 1.2 Musa 2 1.2.1 Classification 2 1.2.2 Morphology and growth 4 1.2.3 Cultivation 5 1.2.3.1 Cultivation areas 5 1.2.3.2 Food production systems 5 1.2.4 Crop importance 7 1.3 Cosmopolites sordidus 8 1.3.1 Classification 8 1.3.2 Distribution 10 1.3.3 Biology and behaviour 10 1.3.4 Population dynamics 12 1.3.5 Pest status 15 1.4 Integrated management 17 1.4.1 Monitoring (sampling) 17 1.4.1.1 Adult trapping 17 1.4.1.2 Damage assessments 19 1.4.1.3 Economic thresholds 21 1.4.2 Host resistance 22 1.4.3 Cultural control 24 1.4.3.1 Crop establishment 24 ii 1.4.3.2 Crop management 26 1.4.3.3 Mass trapping 28 1.4.4 Biological control 29 1.4.4.1 Classical biological control 29 1.4.4.2 Arthropod natural enemies 30 1.4.4.3 Microbial control 31 1.4.5 Chemical control 32 1.5 Conclusions 35 1.6 References 38 Tables 64 Chapter 2: Genetic relationships among populations of Cosmopolites sordidus based on AFLP analysis 65
    [Show full text]
  • Florida Entomological Society 2005 Annual Meeting Presentations
    FLORIDA ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY 2005 ANNUAL MEETING PRESENTATIONS SUNDAY AFTERNOON, JULY 24, 2005 7:00 - 5:00 Office/Presentation Preview Cypress 1:00 - 4:00 Registration Registration 2 1:00 - 4:00 Exhibitors Caloosa Foyer 6:00 Executive Committee Dinner Meeting Tarpon Room Restaurant MONDAY , JULY 25, 2005 7:00 - 5:00 Office/Presentation Preview Cypress 8:00 - 4:00 Registration Registration 2 GENERAL SESSION Steve Lapointe, Presiding Everglades B&C 8:00 Welcoming Remarks 8:10 Presidential Address - Surfing the Tsunami: Challenges Facing the Florida Entomological Society Steve Lapointe 8:30 Pioneer Lecture (http://flaentsoc.org/2005annmeetabstracts.pdf) W. W. Yothers: A Pioneer in Citrus Entomology. 2005 Pioneer Lecturer. Allen G. Selhime, USDA Research Leader (ret.) (http://flaentsoc.org/2005annmeetabstracts.pdf) 9:20 Break Caloosa Foyer 9:45 Business Meeting Everglades Room 12:00 Lunch Break MONDAY, JULY 25, 2005 POSTER SESSION (Authors present from 2:00-3:00) 10:00 AM - 5:30 PM Island Room DSP 1. Semi-artificial rearing system for the pepper weevil, Anthonomus eugenii Cano. Karla M. Addesso and Heather J. McAuslane. University of Florida, Entomology & Nematology Department, P.O. Box 110620, Gainesville, FL 32611-0620 DSP 2. Genitalic identification of Spodoptera moths (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) trapped in Florida with S. litura pheromone lures, and and how to distinguish them from S. litura and S. littoralis, two exotic species. Julieta Brambila. USDA-APHIS- PPQ, P.O. Box 147100, Gainesville, FL 32614-7100 DSP 3. Citrus greening disease in Florida: Monitoring high risk areas through GIS and demographic census data. Andrea B. Chavez, Eduardo M. Varona, and Brett Miller.
    [Show full text]
  • RHYNCHOPHORINAE of SOUTHEASTERN POLYNESIA1 2 (Coleoptera : Curculionidae)
    Pacific Insects 10 (1): 47-77 10 May 1968 RHYNCHOPHORINAE OF SOUTHEASTERN POLYNESIA1 2 (Coleoptera : Curculionidae) By Elwood C. Zimmerman BISHOP MUSEUM, HONOLULU Abstract: Ten species of Rhynchophorinae are recorded from southeastern Polynesia, including two new species of Dryophthorus from Rapa. Excepting the latter, all the spe­ cies have been introduced into the area and most are of economic importance. Keys to adults and larvae, notes on biologies, new distributional data and illustrations are pre­ sented. This is a combined Pacific Entomological Survey (1928-1933) and Mangarevan Expedi­ tion (1934) report. I had hoped to publish the account soon after my return from the 1934 expedition to southeastern Polynesia, but its preparation has been long delayed be­ cause of my pre-occupation with other duties. With the exception of two new endemic species of Dryophthorus, described herein, all of the Rhynchophorinae found in southeastern Polynesia (Polynesia south of Hawaii and east of Samoa; see fig. 1) have been introduced through the agencies of man. The most easterly locality where endemic typical rhynchophorids are known to occur in the mid- Pacific is Samoa where there are endemic species of Diathetes. (I consider the Dryoph- thorini and certain other groups to be atypical Rhynchophorinae). West of Samoa the subfamily becomes increasingly rich and diversified. There are multitudes of genera and species from Papua to India, and it is in the Indo-Pacific where the subfamily is most abundant. Figure 2 demonstrates the comparative faunistic developments of the typical rhynchophorids. I am indebted to the British Museum (Natural History) for allowing me extensive use of the unsurpassed facilities of the Entomology Department and libraries and to the Mu­ seum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, for use of the library.
    [Show full text]
  • Weevils) of the George Washington Memorial Parkway, Virginia
    September 2020 The Maryland Entomologist Volume 7, Number 4 The Maryland Entomologist 7(4):43–62 The Curculionoidea (Weevils) of the George Washington Memorial Parkway, Virginia Brent W. Steury1*, Robert S. Anderson2, and Arthur V. Evans3 1U.S. National Park Service, 700 George Washington Memorial Parkway, Turkey Run Park Headquarters, McLean, Virginia 22101; [email protected] *Corresponding author 2The Beaty Centre for Species Discovery, Research and Collection Division, Canadian Museum of Nature, PO Box 3443, Station D, Ottawa, ON. K1P 6P4, CANADA;[email protected] 3Department of Recent Invertebrates, Virginia Museum of Natural History, 21 Starling Avenue, Martinsville, Virginia 24112; [email protected] ABSTRACT: One-hundred thirty-five taxa (130 identified to species), in at least 97 genera, of weevils (superfamily Curculionoidea) were documented during a 21-year field survey (1998–2018) of the George Washington Memorial Parkway national park site that spans parts of Fairfax and Arlington Counties in Virginia. Twenty-three species documented from the parkway are first records for the state. Of the nine capture methods used during the survey, Malaise traps were the most successful. Periods of adult activity, based on dates of capture, are given for each species. Relative abundance is noted for each species based on the number of captures. Sixteen species adventive to North America are documented from the parkway, including three species documented for the first time in the state. Range extensions are documented for two species. Images of five species new to Virginia are provided. Keywords: beetles, biodiversity, Malaise traps, national parks, new state records, Potomac Gorge. INTRODUCTION This study provides a preliminary list of the weevils of the superfamily Curculionoidea within the George Washington Memorial Parkway (GWMP) national park site in northern Virginia.
    [Show full text]
  • Weevil Borers Affect the Spatio-Temporal Dynamics of Banana Fusarium Wilt
    Journal of Fungi Article Weevil Borers Affect the Spatio-Temporal Dynamics of Banana Fusarium Wilt Daniel W. Heck , Gabriel Alves and Eduardo S. G. Mizubuti * Departamento de Fitopatologia, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa 36570-900, Minas Gerais, Brazil; [email protected] (D.W.H.); [email protected] (G.A.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Dispersal of propagules of a pathogen has remarkable effects on the development of epidemics. Previous studies suggested that insect pests play a role in the development of Fusarium wilt (FW) epidemics in banana fields. We provided complementary evidence for the involvement of two insect pests of banana, the weevil borer (Cosmopolites sordidus L., WB) and the false weevil borer (Metamasius hemipterus L., FWB), in the dispersal of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense (Foc) using a comparative epidemiology approach under field conditions. Two banana plots located in a field with historical records of FW epidemics were used; one was managed with Beauveria bassiana to reduce the population of weevils, and the other was left without B. bassiana applications. The number of WB and FWB was monitored biweekly and the FW incidence was quantified bimonthly during two years. The population of WB and the incidence (6.7%) of FW in the plot managed with B. bassiana were lower than in the plot left unmanaged (13%). The monomolecular model best fitted the FW disease progress data, and as expected, the average estimated disease progress rate was lower in the plot managed with the entomopathogenic fungus (r = 0.002) compared to the unmanaged plot (r = 0.006). Aggregation of FW was higher in the field with WB management.
    [Show full text]
  • Functional Diversity of Soil Nematodes in Relation to the Impact of Agriculture—A Review
    diversity Review Functional Diversity of Soil Nematodes in Relation to the Impact of Agriculture—A Review Stela Lazarova 1,* , Danny Coyne 2 , Mayra G. Rodríguez 3 , Belkis Peteira 3 and Aurelio Ciancio 4,* 1 Institute of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Research, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 2 Y. Gagarin Str., 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria 2 International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA), Kasarani, Nairobi 30772-00100, Kenya; [email protected] 3 National Center for Plant and Animal Health (CENSA), P.O. Box 10, Mayabeque Province, San José de las Lajas 32700, Cuba; [email protected] (M.G.R.); [email protected] (B.P.) 4 Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Istituto per la Protezione Sostenibile delle Piante, 70126 Bari, Italy * Correspondence: [email protected] (S.L.); [email protected] (A.C.); Tel.: +359-8865-32-609 (S.L.); +39-080-5929-221 (A.C.) Abstract: The analysis of the functional diversity of soil nematodes requires detailed knowledge on theoretical aspects of the biodiversity–ecosystem functioning relationship in natural and managed terrestrial ecosystems. Basic approaches applied are reviewed, focusing on the impact and value of soil nematode diversity in crop production and on the most consistent external drivers affecting their stability. The role of nematode trophic guilds in two intensively cultivated crops are examined in more detail, as representative of agriculture from tropical/subtropical (banana) and temperate (apple) climates. The multiple facets of nematode network analysis, for management of multitrophic interactions and restoration purposes, represent complex tasks that require the integration of different interdisciplinary expertise. Understanding the evolutionary basis of nematode diversity at the field Citation: Lazarova, S.; Coyne, D.; level, and its response to current changes, will help to explain the observed community shifts.
    [Show full text]
  • Insect Pathogens As Biological Control Agents: Back to the Future ⇑ L.A
    Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 132 (2015) 1–41 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Invertebrate Pathology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jip Insect pathogens as biological control agents: Back to the future ⇑ L.A. Lacey a, , D. Grzywacz b, D.I. Shapiro-Ilan c, R. Frutos d, M. Brownbridge e, M.S. Goettel f a IP Consulting International, Yakima, WA, USA b Agriculture Health and Environment Department, Natural Resources Institute, University of Greenwich, Chatham Maritime, Kent ME4 4TB, UK c U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, 21 Dunbar Rd., Byron, GA 31008, USA d University of Montpellier 2, UMR 5236 Centre d’Etudes des agents Pathogènes et Biotechnologies pour la Santé (CPBS), UM1-UM2-CNRS, 1919 Route de Mendes, Montpellier, France e Vineland Research and Innovation Centre, 4890 Victoria Avenue North, Box 4000, Vineland Station, Ontario L0R 2E0, Canada f Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lethbridge Research Centre, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada1 article info abstract Article history: The development and use of entomopathogens as classical, conservation and augmentative biological Received 24 March 2015 control agents have included a number of successes and some setbacks in the past 15 years. In this forum Accepted 17 July 2015 paper we present current information on development, use and future directions of insect-specific Available online 27 July 2015 viruses, bacteria, fungi and nematodes as components of integrated pest management strategies for con- trol of arthropod pests of crops, forests, urban habitats, and insects of medical and veterinary importance. Keywords: Insect pathogenic viruses are a fruitful source of microbial control agents (MCAs), particularly for the con- Microbial control trol of lepidopteran pests.
    [Show full text]