DOCSLIB.ORG

Final Report JOINT STORMWATER AGENCY PROJECT to STUDY URBAN SOURCES of MERCURY, PCBS and ORGANOCHLORINE PESTICIDES

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Final Report JOINT STORMWATER AGENCY PROJECT TO STUDY URBAN SOURCES OF MERCURY, PCBS AND ORGANOCHLORINE PESTICIDES A collaborative project of the following agencies: • Santa Clara Valley Urban Runoff Pollution Prevention Program • Contra Costa Clean Water Program • San Mateo Countywide Stormwater Pollution Prevention Program • Marin County Stormwater Pollution Prevention Program • Vallejo Flood Control and Sanitation District • Fairfield-Suisun Sewer District April 2002 Page Intentionally Blank Final Report JOINT STORMWATER AGENCY PROJECT TO STUDY URBAN SOURCES OF MERCURY, PCBS AND ORGANOCHLORINE PESTICIDES A collaborative project of the following agencies: • Santa Clara Valley Urban Runoff Pollution Prevention Program • Contra Costa Clean Water Program • San Mateo Countywide Stormwater Pollution Prevention Program • Marin County Stormwater Pollution Prevention Program • Vallejo Flood Control and Sanitation District • Fairfield-Suisun Sewer District Prepared by: Kinnetic Laboratories, Inc. 307 Washington Street Santa Cruz, California 95060 In Association with: EOA, Inc. 1410 Jackson Street Oakland, California 94612 April 2002 Page Intentionally Blank TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Tables...................................................................................................................................ii List of Figures............................................................................................................................... iii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY......................................................................................................ES-1 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................1 1.1 Background and Overview............................................................................................1 1.2 Project Objectives .........................................................................................................2 2.0 METHODS............................................................................................................................3 2.1 Selection of Sampling Sites...........................................................................................3 2.2 Sampling Procedures...................................................................................................20 2.2.1 Initial Sampling Equipment Decontamination ..............................................20 2.2.2 Field Sampling Procedures............................................................................20 2.3 Analytical Methods and Reporting Limits ..................................................................24 2.4 Field and Laboratory Quality Control.........................................................................24 2.4.1 Field Sampling Quality Control.....................................................................24 2.4.2 Laboratory Quality Control ...........................................................................24 2.5 Data Analysis ..............................................................................................................26 2.5.1 Descriptive Statistics.....................................................................................26 2.5.2 Hypothesis Testing........................................................................................26 2.5.3 Stormwater Load Estimations........................................................................26 2.5.3.1 Watersheds and Land Use .............................................................28 2.5.3.2 Runoff Coefficients.......................................................................30 2.5.3.3 Rainfall .......................................................................................31 2.5.3.4 Contaminant Concentrations.........................................................34 3.0 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION ......................................................................................35 3.1 Major Land Use...........................................................................................................48 3.2 Urban and Nonurban ...................................................................................................51 3.2.1 Comparison iment with Recent San Francisco Bay Sediments.....................52 3.3 Stormwater Load Estimates.........................................................................................57 3.3.1 Assessment of potential impacts of cleanup activities on PCB loading ........57 3.4 Top 15th Percentile Sites..............................................................................................62 3.5 PCB Homologs............................................................................................................68 4.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS.........................................................73 4.1 Conclusions.................................................................................................................73 4.2 Recommendations.......................................................................................................74 5.0 REFERENCES.................................................................................................................75 Appendix A: Summary of Analytical Results for PCBs and Organochlorine Pesticides. Appendix B: Site Descriptions, Field Notes, Site Photos (Photos provided on CD only) Appendix C: Sediment Particle Size Data Results Appendix D: QA/QC Assessment Appendix E: Laboratory Data Sheets (Provided on CD only) LIST OF TABLES Table ES.1 Summary of Estimated Stormwater Loads to San Francisco Bay from 17 Watersheds and Portions Contributed by Urban Sources....................................ES-3 Table 1. Number of sampling locations by jurisdiction and drainage type. ............................3 Table 2. Station location percentages by jurisdiction and drainage type.................................4 Table 3. Sampling locations and station identifications 2000-2001......................................15 Table 4. Parameters, methods, and holding times for analysis of sediments ........................22 Table 5. Comparison of Regional Monitoring Program target method detection limits (MDLs) for PCB congeners with project specific MDLs and method reporting limits (MRLs) ..........................................................................................................23 Table 6. Comparison of Regional Monitoring Program target method detection limits (MDLs) for organochlorine pesticides with project specific MDLs and method reporting limits (MRLs). .........................................................................................24 Table 7. Summary of laboratory quality control performance measures and data quality objectives for measurement of mercury, PCBs, organochlorine pesticides, TOC and grain size in sediments......................................................................................25 Table 8. Summary of drainage areas and land use within each hydrologic area tributary to San Francisco Bay ...................................................................................................30 Table 9. Estimates of impervious fraction and calculated runoff coefficients for each major land use category...........................................................................................31 Table 10. Runoff coefficients used by SFEI (2000)................................................................31 Table 11. Summary of data used to estimate average annual rainfall in each region..............33 Table 12. Average annual rainfall values used for each hydrologic area.. ..............................34 Table 13. Estimates of the range and average concentration of suspended solids in stormwater runoff from the five major land use classifications. .............................34 Table 14. Summary of first year (2000) data results from each sampling location ................36 Table 15. Summary of data results from 2001 survey at each sampling location ...................38 Table 16. Summary of 2001 data normalized to the fine fraction (<62.5 microns).. ..............41 Table 17. Statistical summary of results by major land use classification ..............................49 Table 18. Statistical comparison of analyte concentration in sediments from storm drainages in four major land use categories. ...........................................................51 Table 19. Statistical summary of results by urban and nonurban land use categories. ...........53 Table 20. Statistical comparison of analyte concentration in sediments from urban and nonurban (open) storm drainages... .........................................................................54 Table 21. Estimates of annual loading (lbs/year) of PCBs, total mercury, chlordane and DDT to San Francisco Bay from each major watershed. ........................................59 Table 22. Estimates of annual loading (lbs/year) of PCBs, total mercury, chlordane and DDT to San Francisco Bay from each major land use category..............................60 Table 23. Comparison of current annual PCB load estimates with two source reduction scenarios. .................................................................................................................60 Table 24. List of sites identified with the top 15th percentile concentrations of total PCBs and mercury from sampling conducted in 2001. .....................................................64 Table 25. List
Recommended publications
  • Wwf Raw May 18 1998

    Wwf Raw May 18 1998

    Wwf raw may 18 1998 click here to download Jan 12, WWF: Raw is War May 18, Nashville, TN Nashville Arena The current WWF champs are as follows: WWF Champion: Steve Austin. Apr 22, -A video package recaps how Vince McMahon has stacked the deck against WWF Champion Steve Austin at Over the Edge and the end of last. Monday Night RAW Promotion WWF Date May 18, Venue Nashville Arena City Nashville, Tennessee Previous episode May 11, Next episode May. Apr 9, WWF Monday Night RAW 5/18/ Hot off the heels of some damn good shows I feel that it will continue. Nitro is preempted again and RAW. May 19, Craig Wilson & Jamie Lithgow 'Monday Night Wars' continues with the episodes of Raw and Nitro from 18 May Nitro is just an hour long. May 21, Monday Night Raw: May 18th, Last week, Dude Love was reinvented as a suit-wearing suit (nice one, eh?) and named the number one. Monday Night Raw May 18 Val Venis vs. 2 Cold Scorpio Terry Funk vs. Marc Mero Disciples of Apocalypse vs. LOD Dude Love vs. Dustin Runnells. Jan 5, May 18, – RAW: Val Venis b Too Cold Scorpio, Terry Funk b Marc Mero, The Disciples of Apocalypse b LOD (Hawk & Animal), Dude. Dec 22, Publicly, Vince has ignored the challenge, but WWF as a whole didn't. On Raw, Jim Ross talked shit about WCW for the whole show. X-Pac and. On the April 13, episode of Raw Is War, Dude Love interfered in a WWF World On the May 18 episode of Raw Is War, Vader attacked Kane during a tag .
  • Currere, Illness, and Motherhood: a Dwelling Place for Examining the Self

    Currere, Illness, and Motherhood: a Dwelling Place for Examining the Self

    Georgia Southern University Digital Commons@Georgia Southern Electronic Theses and Dissertations Graduate Studies, Jack N. Averitt College of Spring 2011 Currere, Illness, and Motherhood: A Dwelling Place for Examining the Self Michelle C. Thompson Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/etd Recommended Citation Thompson, Michelle C., "Currere, Illness, and Motherhood: A Dwelling Place for Examining the Self" (2011). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 550. https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/etd/550 This dissertation (open access) is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies, Jack N. Averitt College of at Digital Commons@Georgia Southern. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons@Georgia Southern. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CURRERE, ILLNESS, AND MOTHERHOOD: A DWELLING PLACE FOR EXAMINING THE SELF by MICHELLE C. THOMPSON (Under the Direction of Marla Morris) ABSTRACT This dissertation is a pathography, my experience as a mother dwelling with illness which began because of my son‘s illness. The purpose of this dissertation is two-fold: to examine my Self as a mother dwelling with illness so that I may begin to work through repressed emotions and to further complicate the conversation begun by Marla Morris (2008) by illuminating the ill person‘s voice as one which is underrepresented in the canon. This dissertation is written autobiographically and analyzed psychoanalytically. The subjects of chaos, the Self, and motherhood are examined as they apply to my illness. In addition to psychoanalysis, this dissertation draws from illness narratives, pathographies, and other stories of illness as a way to collaborate voices within the illness community.
  • Virtually Obscene: the Case for an Uncensored Internet

    Virtually Obscene: the Case for an Uncensored Internet

    Virtually Obscene: The Case For an Uncensored Internet By: Amy E. White Citation: AMY E. WHITE, VIRTUALLY OBSCENE: THE CASE FOR AN UNCENSORED INTERNET (McFarland & Company, Inc., 2006). Reviewed By: Robert Sanfilippo1 Relevant Legal & Academic Areas: Constitutional Law, Internet Law, Censorship, Freedom of Speech, Government Regulation Summary: Virtually Obscene is divided into seven chapters. Chapter 1 provides an overview of what the Internet is, describing its origin, structure, and various attempts to regulate it. Chapter 2 provides an overview of the current obscenity standards in the United States and discusses the problems therein, while providing the author’s proposals and alternatives to the current standard. Chapter 3 discusses the First Amendment, particularly the freedom of speech clause and the arguments surrounding it, as well as the author’s reasons why freedom of speech does not protect Internet obscenity.2 Chapters 4, 5, and 6, introduce and analyze the arguments of Internet obscenity and its harm to children, women and the moral environment, respectively. Chapter 7 concludes with a discussion of why Internet obscenity regulation is “a bad idea.” About the Author: Amy E. White holds a doctorate in philosophy from Bowling Green State University.3 Dr. White is an assistant professor of philosophy at Ohio University in Zanesville, Ohio.4 Chapter 1- The Unknown Territory and the Quest to Tame the Internet Beast • Chapter Summary: Chapter 1 begins with an introduction briefly discussing pornographic websites. The chapter continues by examining what the Internet is, including its history and structure. The author touches upon different attempts at regulating the Internet and provides examples describing how foreign countries have 1 J.D.
  • Students Assaulted in Hate Crime, Suspects Unknown to Light TCUJ's Role

    Students Assaulted in Hate Crime, Suspects Unknown to Light TCUJ's Role

    THETUFTS DAILY (WhereYou Read It First 2,1999 Volume XXXVIII, Number 25 I Tuesday, March __ Students assaulted in hate crime, suspects unknown I byDANIELBARBARIS1 wordswereexchangedatthistime. tim suffered only minor bruises. Daily Editorial Board “The two males continued on The suspect’s identity, as well Tufts was rocked this weekend their way down the street,” Keith as whether he was a Tufts student, by what appears to be a violent continued. “As they came down remains unknown, although a hate crime, one that left two stu- Emory, the third male came run- physical description given by the dents in the hospital and the Tufts ning after them, yelling at them two victims lists him as a white University Police Department from behind. He ran up to one of male, 5’9”, with dirty blonde hair (TUPD)searchingforanunknown the individuals, knocked him to over his ears and amuscular build. assailant. the ground, and punched and The suspect was wearing a white The assault, which took place kickedhim. tanktop, bluejeans, andwasclean at 4: 10 a.m. Sunday morning, oc- “Thesecondvictimtriedtohelp, shaven. The possibility exists, curredonEmorySt.,whilethetwo but was punched and kicked as Keith said, that the assailant had students,whosenameshavebeen well. The suspect then fled on been at the party with the two withheld, were returning from an foot,” Keith concluded. victims prior to the assault. off-campus party, according to When askedwhatthethirdmale “There’s some indication that TUPD Captain Mark Keith. said to the two victims, Captain the suspect may have been at the “There was a party at a resi- Keith responded that the suspect party.
  • Natural and Human Factors Affecting Shallow Water Quality in Surficial Aquifers in the Connecticut Housatonic, and Thames River Basins

    Natural and Human Factors Affecting Shallow Water Quality in Surficial Aquifers in the Connecticut Housatonic, and Thames River Basins

    U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey National Water-Quality Assessment Program Natural and Human Factors Affecting Shallow Water Quality in Surficial Aquifers in the Connecticut Housatonic, and Thames River Basins Water-Resources Investigations Report 98-4042 Connecticut, Housatonic, and Thames River study unit National Water-Quality Assessment Study Unit USGS science for a changing world Natural and Human Factors Affecting Shallow Water Quality in Surficial Aquifers in the Connecticut, Housatonic, and Thames River Basins By STEPHEN J. GRADY anofJOHN R. MULLANEY_____ U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 98-4042 NATIONAL WATER-QUALITY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM Maryborough, Massachusetts 1998 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas J. Casadevall, Acting Director The use of trade or product names in this report is for identification purposes only and does not constitute endorsement by the U.S. Geological Survey. For additional information write to: Copies of this report can be purchased from: Chief, Massachusetts-Rhode Island District U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Branch of Information Services Water Resources Division Box 25286, Building 810 28 Lord Road, Suite 280 Denver, CO 80225-0286 Marlborough, MA 01752 FOREWORD The mission of the U.S. Geological Survey Describe how water quality is changing over (USGS) is to assess the quantity and quality of the time. earth resources of the Nation and to provide informa­ Improve understanding of the primary natural tion that will assist resource managers and policymak- and human factors that affect water-quality ers at Federal, State, and local levels in making sound conditions.
  • Distribution of Dissolved Pesticides and Other Water Quality Constituents in Small Streams, and Their Relation to Land Use, in T

    Distribution of Dissolved Pesticides and Other Water Quality Constituents in Small Streams, and Their Relation to Land Use, in T

    Cover photographs: Upper left—Filbert orchard near Mount Angel, Oregon, during spring, 1993. Upper right—Irrigated cornfield near Albany, Oregon, during summer, 1994. Center left—Road near Amity, Oregon, during spring 1996. The shoulder of the road has been treated with herbicide to prevent weed growth. Center right—Little Pudding River near Brooks, Oregon, during spring, 1993. Lower left—Fields of oats and wheat near Junction City, Oregon, during summer, 1994. (Photographs by Dennis A. Wentz, U.S. Geological Survey.) Distribution of Dissolved Pesticides and Other Water Quality Constituents in Small Streams, and their Relation to Land Use, in the Willamette River Basin, Oregon, 1996 By CHAUNCEY W. ANDERSON, TAMARA M. WOOD, and JENNIFER L. MORACE U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 97–4268 Prepared in cooperation with the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality and Oregon Association of Clean Water Agencies Portland, Oregon 1997 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Mark Schaefer, Acting Director The use of firm, trade, and brand names in this report is for identification purposes only and does not constitute endorsement by the U.S. Geological Survey. For additional information write to: Copies of this report can be purchased from: U.S. Geological Survey District Chief Information Services U.S. Geological Survey Box 25286 10615 SE Cherry Blossom Drive Federal Center Portland, Oregon 97216 Denver, CO 80225 E-mail: [email protected] CONTENTS
  • Pesticide Compounds in Streamwater in the Delaware River Basin, December 1998–August 2001

    Pesticide Compounds in Streamwater in the Delaware River Basin, December 1998–August 2001

    NATIONAL WATER-QUALITY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM Pesticide Compounds in Streamwater in the Delaware River Basin, December 1998–August 2001 Scientific Investigations Report 2004-5105 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey NATIONAL WATER-QUALITY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM Pesticide Compounds in Streamwater in the Delaware River Basin, December 1998–August 2001 Scientific Investigations Report 2004-5105 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Pesticide Compounds in Streamwater in the Delaware River Basin, December 1998–August 2001 By R. Edward Hickman Prepared as part of the NATIONAL WATER-QUALITY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM Scientific Investigations Report 2004-5105 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior Gale A. Norton, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Charles G. Groat, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2004 For sale by U.S. Geological Survey, Information Services Box 25286, Denver Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 For additional information write to: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey Mountain View Office Park 810 Bear Tavern Road West Trenton, NJ 08628 For more information about the USGS and its products: Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/ Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. iii Foreword The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) is committed to serve the Nation with accurate and timely sci- entific information that helps enhance and protect the overall quality of life, and facilitates effec- tive management of water, biological, energy, and mineral resources.
  • School Associated Violent Deaths

    School Associated Violent Deaths

    The National School Safety Center's Report on School Associated Violent Deaths Internet: www.schoolsafety.us E-mail: [email protected] In-House Report of the National School Safety Center 141 Duesenberg Drive, Suite 11 • Westlake Village, CA 91362 • Ph: 805/373-9977 • Fax: 805/373-9277 Dr. Ronald D. Stephens, Executive Director DEFINITION: A school-associated violent death is any homicide, suicide, or weapons-related violent death in the United States in which the fatal injury occurred: 1) on the property of a functioning public, private or parochial elementary or secondary school, Kindergarten through grade 12, (including alternative schools); 2) on the way to or from regular sessions at such a school; 3) while person was attending or was on the way to or from an official school-sponsored event; 4) as an obvious direct result of school incident/s, function/s or activities, whether on or off school bus/vehicle or school property. * Note: Not a scientific survey. Since information is taken from newspaper clipping services, it is possible that not all such clippings have reached the NSSC. SCOPE: Newspaper accounts, on which NSSC bases this report, frequently do not list names and ages of those who are charged with the deaths of others. Such omissions were in some cases because the person charged was a minor. In some instances, persons were killed in drive-by shootings, gang encounters or during melees in which the killer was not identified, and the killers were either never apprehended or were caught days or months after the crime was first reported.
  • JEA/NSPA Spring National High School Journalism Convention

    JEA/NSPA Spring National High School Journalism Convention

    SEATTLE JEA/NSPA Spring National High School Journalism Convention April 6-9, 2017 • Seattle Sheraton & Washington State Convention Center PARK SCHOLAR PROGRAM A once-in-a-lifetime opportunity awaits outstanding high school seniors. A full scholarship for at least 10 exceptional communications students that covers the four-year cost of attendance at Ithaca College. Take a chance. Seize an opportunity. Change your life. Study at one of the most prestigious communications schools in the country—Ithaca College’s Roy H. Park School of Communications. Join a group of bright, competitive, and energetic students who – Kacey Deamer ’13 are committed to using mass Journalism & communication to make a Environmental Studies positive impact on the world. To apply for this remarkable opportunity and to learn more, contact the Park Scholar Program director at [email protected] or 607-274-3089. ithaca.edu/parkscholars SEA the COLOR CONTENTS 2 Convention Officials 3 Local Planning Team 3 Convention Sponsors 4 Exhibitors/Advertisers SEA the SIGHTS 7 Keynote Speaker 8 Featured Speakers 10 Special Activities 14 Awards 19 Thursday at a Glance 20 Thursday Sessions 24 Friday at a Glance 29 Write-off Rooms 30 Friday Sessions 48 Saturday at a Glance 53 Saturday Sessions 65 Sunday SEA the JOURNALISM 68 Speaker Bios #nhsjc 88 Floor Plans COVER: EMP Museum and the Seattle Space Needle share acreage on the Seattle Center grounds. Photo by Tim Thompson. UPPER RIGHT: Pike Place Market is one of the nation’s oldest continuously operated farmer’s markets, best known for its offering of fresh, regional seafood and beautiful flowers.
  • ECW (Extreme Championship Wrestling) - Deep Impact Uncensored

    ECW (Extreme Championship Wrestling) - Deep Impact Uncensored

    ECW (Extreme Championship Wrestling) - Deep Impact Uncensored This can be a 3 rd fitting with ECW's "Best of" Digital video disc line.Being without been able to stick to ECW in the course of its "Golden" ages (it did not air outside the region) I quickly invested in this specific Video.For me, it turned out revenue well spent.The DVD characteristics Seven satisfies (in fact Nine if you consider about this, much more about this in the future...) as well as Wonderful Dvd and blu-ray accessories.Here i will discuss the actual match up rundown: A person. Mikey Whipwreck or A Sandman (w/ Lady) compared to "Superstar" Ken Dallas (12/9/95):Three-way party for any ECW Great quality identify.This fit per se was pretty typical, BUT it by itself delivered greater than it's great amount involving "money's worth" materials within this Dvd and blu-ray.Naturally, ECW is intending so that you can drive with Rock Cold's coat tails.This introduction towards the go with (by way of video clip deals) truly comes after a lot of Austin's ECW profession showing his feud together with the Sandman and the pursuit to overcom Mikey Whipwreck for the ECW Best quality title.Flick offer actually demonstrates almost all of Austin's very first match with Mikey wherever Mikey problems your "Stone Cool Superstar" for that gain.A go with itself seemed to be typical but is actually alone more like two fits (Mikey vs. Austin texas, Austin, tx vs. Sandman).Good technical wrestling using Austin along with Mikey along with respectable hard core complement Austin as well as the Sandman.Total, a great find Austin fans from their "pre-Stone Cold" nights.Five personalities.
  • Primary & Secondary Sources

    Primary & Secondary Sources

    Primary & Secondary Sources Brands & Products Agencies & Clients Media & Content Influencers & Licensees Organizations & Associations Government & Education Research & Data Multicultural Media Forecast 2019: Primary & Secondary Sources COPYRIGHT U.S. Multicultural Media Forecast 2019 Exclusive market research & strategic intelligence from PQ Media – Intelligent data for smarter business decisions In partnership with the Alliance for Inclusive and Multicultural Marketing at the Association of National Advertisers Co-authored at PQM by: Patrick Quinn – President & CEO Leo Kivijarv, PhD – EVP & Research Director Editorial Support at AIMM by: Bill Duggan – Group Executive Vice President, ANA Claudine Waite – Director, Content Marketing, Committees & Conferences, ANA Carlos Santiago – President & Chief Strategist, Santiago Solutions Group Except by express prior written permission from PQ Media LLC or the Association of National Advertisers, no part of this work may be copied or publicly distributed, displayed or disseminated by any means of publication or communication now known or developed hereafter, including in or by any: (i) directory or compilation or other printed publication; (ii) information storage or retrieval system; (iii) electronic device, including any analog or digital visual or audiovisual device or product. PQ Media and the Alliance for Inclusive and Multicultural Marketing at the Association of National Advertisers will protect and defend their copyright and all their other rights in this publication, including under the laws of copyright, misappropriation, trade secrets and unfair competition. All information and data contained in this report is obtained by PQ Media from sources that PQ Media believes to be accurate and reliable. However, errors and omissions in this report may result from human error and malfunctions in electronic conversion and transmission of textual and numeric data.
  • C Number: C88004B Lock Date: 05/18/1998 Cage Range: All Date

    C Number: C88004B Lock Date: 05/18/1998 Cage Range: All Date

    Experiment Number: 88004-01 P11: STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF SURVIVAL DATA Date Report Requested: 10/15/2014 Test Type: 14-DAY Test Compound: Divinylbenzene Time Report Requested: 22:47:15 Species/Strain: Rat/F 344/N CAS Number: 1321-74-0 First Dose M/F: NA / NA Lab: BNW C Number: C88004B Lock Date: 05/18/1998 Cage Range: All Date Range: All Reasons For Removal: All Removal Date Range: All Treatment Groups: All Study Gender: Both PWG Approval Date NONE Experiment Number: 88004-01 P11: STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF SURVIVAL DATA Date Report Requested: 10/15/2014 Test Type: 14-DAY Test Compound: Divinylbenzene Time Report Requested: 22:47:15 Species/Strain: Rat/F 344/N CAS Number: 1321-74-0 First Dose M/F: NA / NA Lab: BNW Male RAT FIRST TERMINAL SACRIFICE AT 17 DAYS INDIVIDUAL SURVIVAL TIMES (DAYS) DOSE = CONTROL TOTAL 5 UNCENSORED DEATHS 0 CENSORED DEATHS 0 TERMINAL 5 UNCENSORED DEATH DAYS none CENSORED DEATH DAYS none DOSE = 25 PPM TOTAL 5 UNCENSORED DEATHS 0 CENSORED DEATHS 0 TERMINAL 5 UNCENSORED DEATH DAYS none CENSORED DEATH DAYS none DOSE = 50 PPM TOTAL 5 UNCENSORED DEATHS 0 CENSORED DEATHS 0 TERMINAL 5 UNCENSORED DEATH DAYS none CENSORED DEATH DAYS none DOSE = 100 PPM TOTAL 5 UNCENSORED DEATHS 0 CENSORED DEATHS 0 TERMINAL 5 UNCENSORED DEATH DAYS none CENSORED DEATH DAYS none (A) FIRST TERMINAL SACRIFICE (B) THE FIRST ENTRY IS THE TREND TEST (TARONE, 1975) RESULT. SUBSEQUENT ENTRIES ARE THE RESULTS OF PAIRWISE TESTS (COX, 1972). NEGATIVE TRENDS ARE INDICATED BY "N". (C) MEAN OF ALL UNCENSORED DEATHS PRIOR TO TERMINAL SACRIFICE (D) MEAN OF