Import Restrictions Imposed on Under 19 U.S.C

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Import Restrictions Imposed on Under 19 U.S.C 31910 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 114 / Wednesday, June 16, 2021 / Rules and Regulations Comp., p. 786; Notice of September 18, 2020, Rulings, Office of Trade, (202) 325– (4) that the application of import 85 FR 59641 (September 22, 2020); Notice of 0300, ot-otrrculturalproperty@ restrictions as set forth in this final rule November 12, 2020, 85 FR 72897 (November cbp.dhs.gov. For operational aspects, is consistent with the general interests 13, 2020). Pinky Khan, Branch Chief, Commercial of the international community in the Supplement No. 4 to Part 744 Targeting and Analysis Center, Trade interchange of cultural property among [Amended] Policy and Programs, Office of Trade, nations for scientific, cultural, and (202) 325–3839, [email protected]. educational purposes (19 U.S.C. ■ 2. Supplement No. 4 to part 744 is SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 2602(a)(1)(D)). The Assistant Secretary amended: also found that the material described in ■ a. Under FRANCE by removing the Background the determinations meets the statutory entry for ‘‘Satori Corporation’’; and The Convention on Cultural Property definition of ‘‘archaeological or ■ b. Under the UNITED ARAB Implementation Act, Public Law 97– ethnological material of the State Party’’ EMIRATES by removing the entry for 446, 19 U.S.C. 2601 et seq. (hereinafter, (19 U.S.C. 2601(2)). ‘‘Satori Corporation.’’ ‘‘the Cultural Property Implementation The Agreement Matthew S. Borman, Act’’) implements the 1970 United Nations Educational, Scientific and On January 19, 2021, the United Deputy Assistant Secretary for Export States and Turkey signed a bilateral Administration. Cultural Organization (UNESCO) Convention on the Means of Prohibiting agreement, ‘‘Memorandum of [FR Doc. 2021–12751 Filed 6–15–21; 8:45 am] and Preventing the Illicit Import, Export Understanding between the Government BILLING CODE 3510–33–P and Transfer of Ownership of Cultural of the United States of America and the Property (hereinafter, ‘‘the Convention’’ Government of the Republic of Turkey (823 U.N.T.S. 231 (1972)). Pursuant to Concerning the Imposition of Import DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND the Cultural Property Implementation Restrictions on Categories of SECURITY Act, the United States entered into a Archaeological and Ethnological bilateral agreement with the Republic of Material of Turkey’’ (‘‘the Agreement’’), U.S. Customs and Border Protection Turkey (Turkey) to impose import pursuant to the provisions of 19 U.S.C. restrictions on certain archaeological 2602(a)(2). The Agreement entered into DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and ethnological material from Turkey. force on March 24, 2021, upon the This rule announces that the United exchange of diplomatic notes, and 19 CFR Part 12 States is now imposing import enables the promulgation of import [CBP Dec. 21–09] restrictions on certain archaeological restrictions on categories of and ethnological material from Turkey. archaeological material, ranging in date RIN 1515–AE64 from approximately 1.2 million years Determinations ago to A.D. 1770, and ethnological Import Restrictions Imposed on Under 19 U.S.C. 2602(a)(1), the material, ranging in date from the 1st Categories of Archaeological and United States must make certain century A.D. to A.D. 1923, representing Ethnological Material of Turkey determinations before entering into an Turkey’s cultural heritage. A list of the agreement to impose import restrictions AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border categories of archaeological and under 19 U.S.C. 2602(a)(2). On March Protection, Department of Homeland ethnological material subject to the 27, 2020, the Assistant Secretary for Security; Department of the Treasury. import restrictions is set forth later in Educational and Cultural Affairs, United this document. ACTION: Final rule. States Department of State, after consultation with and recommendation Restriction and Amendment to the SUMMARY: This final rule amends the Regulations U.S. Customs and Border Protection by the Cultural Property Advisory In accordance with the Agreement, (CBP) regulations to reflect the Committee, made the determinations required under the statute with respect importation of material designated imposition of import restrictions on to certain archaeological and below is subject to the restrictions of 19 certain categories of archaeological and ethnological material originating in U.S.C. 2606 and § 12.104g(a) of title 19 ethnological material from the Republic Turkey that is described in the of the Code of Federal Regulations (19 of Turkey (Turkey). These restrictions Designated List set forth below in this CFR 12.104g(a)) and will be restricted are being imposed pursuant to an document. from entry into the United States unless agreement between the United States These determinations include the the conditions set forth in 19 U.S.C. and Turkey that has been entered into following: (1) That the cultural 2606 and § 12.104c of the CBP under the authority of the Convention patrimony of Turkey is in jeopardy from Regulations (19 CFR 12.104c) are met. on Cultural Property Implementation the pillage of archaeological material CBP is amending § 12.104g(a) of the CBP Act. This final rule amends the CBP representing Turkey’s cultural heritage Regulations (19 CFR 12.104g(a)) to regulations by adding Turkey to the list dating from approximately 1.2 million indicate that these import restrictions of countries which have a bilateral years ago to A.D. 1770, and ethnological have been imposed. agreement with the United States that material dating from approximately the Import restrictions listed as 19 CFR imposes cultural property import 1st century A.D. to A.D. 1923; (2) that 12.104g(a) are effective for no more than restrictions. This final rule also contains the Turkish government has taken five years beginning on the date on the Designated List that describes the measures consistent with the which the Agreement enters into force types of archaeological and ethnological Convention to protect its cultural with respect to the United States. This material to which the restrictions apply. patrimony (19 U.S.C. 2602(a)(1)(B)); (3) period may be extended for additional DATES: Effective on June 16, 2021. that import restrictions imposed by the periods of not more than five years if it FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For United States would be of substantial is determined that the factors which legal aspects, Lisa L. Burley, Chief, benefit in deterring a serious situation of justified the Agreement still pertain and Cargo Security, Carriers and Restricted pillage and remedies less drastic are not no cause for suspension of the Merchandise Branch, Regulations and available (19 U.S.C. 2602(a)(1)(C)); and Agreement exists. The import VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:52 Jun 15, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\16JNR1.SGM 16JNR1 jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 114 / Wednesday, June 16, 2021 / Rules and Regulations 31911 restrictions will expire on March 24, Urartians: 900–580 B.C. date: 10th millennium B.C. to the 18th 2026, unless extended. Orientalizing Period: 750–600 B.C. century A.D. Lydians: 700–540 B.C. e. Small Statuary—This type includes Designated List of Archaeological and Karians and Lykians: 700–300 B.C. humans, deities (idols), mythological Ethnological Material of Turkey Archaic Period: 650–474 B.C. creatures, animals, and groups of figures The Agreement between the United Classical Period: 480–330 B.C. in the round, as well as parts of figures. States and Turkey includes, but is not Persian Period: 546–331 B.C. Some early examples of human idols are limited to, the categories of objects Macedonian Empire and Hellenistic stylized, such as ‘‘violin-shaped’’ described in the Designated List set Period: 334–30 B.C. figures. Approximate date: 10th forth below. Importation of material on Roman Period: 130 B.C.–A.D. 395 millennium B.C. to the 18th century this list is restricted unless the material Byzantine (Eastern Roman) Period: A.D. A.D. is accompanied by documentation 395–1453 f. Small Scale Inlay Sculpture—Small- certifying that the material left Turkey Seljukian Period: A.D. 1071–1308 scale examples include flat, cut-out legally and not in violation of the export Anatolian Beyliks Period: A.D. 1256– figures in light-colored stones set laws of Turkey. 1522 against dark stone or bitumen The Designated List includes Islamic/Ottoman Period: A.D. 1299– backgrounds. These may decorate boxes archaeological material from Turkey 1923 or furniture. Subject matter includes ranging in date from approximately 1.2 A. Stone narrative scenes such as warfare and 1. Sculpture million years ago to A.D. 1770, and banquet scenes. Approximate date: 10th a. Architectural Elements—Primarily ethnological material from Turkey from millennium B.C. to the 18th century in basalt, limestone, and marble; the 1st century A.D. to the end of the A.D. including blocks from walls, floors, and Ottoman Empire with the foundation of g. Furniture—In limestone, basalt, and ceilings; acroterion, antefix, architrave, the Republic of Turkey in A.D. 1923. marble. Types include tables (trapezas), columns, capitals, bases, lintels, jambs, one-legged tables (monopodias), Categories of Archaeological and friezes, pediments, tympanum, metopes, thrones, fulcras, and beds. Approximate Ethnological Material and pilasters; doors, door frames, and date: 10th millennium B.C. to the 18th I. Archaeological Material window fittings; caryatids, columns, century A.D. A. Stone altars, prayer niches, mihrab, screens, 2. Vessels—In marble, steatite, rock B. Metal wellheads, fountains, mosaics, and tiles. crystal, and other stone. These may C. Ceramic, Terracotta, and Faience This category also includes relief and belong to conventional shapes such as D. Bone, Ivory, and Other Organic Material inlay sculpture that may have been part bowls, cups, jars, jugs, and lamps, or E. Wood of a building, such as friezes of sculpted may occur in the shape of a human or F.
Recommended publications
  • Nile Valley-Levant Interactions: an Eclectic Review
    Nile Valley-Levant interactions: an eclectic review The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Bar-Yosef, Ofer. 2013. Nile Valley-Levant interactions: an eclectic review. In Neolithisation of Northeastern Africa, ed. Noriyuki Shirai. Studies in Early Near Eastern Production, Subsistence, and Environment 16: 237-247. Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:31887680 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Open Access Policy Articles, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#OAP In: N. Shirai (ed.) Neolithization of Northeastern Africa. Studies in Early Near Eastern: Production, Subsistence, & Environment 16, ex oriente: Berlin. pp. 237-247. Nile Valley-Levant interactions: an eclectic review Ofer Bar-Yosef Department of Anthropology, Harvard University Opening remarks Writing a review of a prehistoric province as an outsider is not a simple task. The archaeological process, as we know today, is an integration of data sets – the information from the field and the laboratory analyses, and the interpretation that depends on the paradigm held by the writer affected by his or her personal experience. Even monitoring the contents of most of the published and online literature is a daunting task. It is particularly true for looking at the Egyptian Neolithic during the transition from foraging to farming and herding, when most of the difficulties originate from the poorly known bridging regions. A special hurdle is the terminological conundrum of the Neolithic, as Andrew Smith and Alison Smith discusses in this volume, and in particular the term “Neolithisation” that finally made its way to the Levantine literature.
    [Show full text]
  • Documenta Praehistorica XLVI
    UNIVERSITY OF LJUBLJANA FACULTY OF ARTS DEPARTMENT OF ARCHAEOLOGY DocumentaDocumenta PraehistPraehistoricaorica XLVIXLVI Documenta Praehistorica XLVI EDITOR Mihael Budja ISSN 1408–967X (Print) ISSN 1854–2492 (Online) LJUBLJANA 2019 DOCUMENTA PRAEHISTORICA XLVI (2019) Urednika/Editors: Prof. Dr. Mihael Budja, urednik/editor, [email protected] Bojan Kambič, tehnični urednik/technical editor, [email protected] Uredniški odbor/Editorial board: Maja Andrič, Institute of Archaeology, ZRC SAZU, Ljubljana, Slovenia Mihael Budja, University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Arts, Slovenia Canan Çakirlar, University of Groningen, Faculty of Arts, Netherlands Ekaterina Dolbunova, The State Hermitage Museum, The department of archaeology of Eastern Europe and Siberia, Saint-Petersburg, Russian Federation Ya-Mei Hou, Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropolgy, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China Dimitrij Mlekuž Vrhovnik, University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Arts, Slovenia; Institute for the protection of the cultural heritage of Slovenia, Ljubljana, Slovenia Simona Petru, University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Arts, Slovenia Žiga Šmit, University of Ljubljana, Faculty of mathematics and physics, Slovenia Katherine Willis, University of Oxford, United Kingdom Andreja Žibrat Gašparič, University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Arts, Slovenia To delo je ponujeno pod licenco Creative Commons Priznanje avtorstva-Deljenje pod enakimi pogoji 4.0 Mednarodna licenca/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Založila in izdala/Published by: Znanstvena založba Filozofske fakultete, Univerza v Ljubljani/ Ljubljana University Press, Faculty of Arts ([email protected]; www.ff.uni-lj.si) Za založbo/For the publisher: Prof. Dr. Roman Kuhar, dekan Filozofske fakultete Naslov uredništva/Address of Editorial Board: Oddelek za arheologijo, Filozofska fakulteta, Univerza v Ljubljani, Aškerčeva 2, 1001 Ljubljana, p.p.
    [Show full text]
  • Kernos Revue Internationale Et Pluridisciplinaire De Religion Grecque Antique
    Kernos Revue internationale et pluridisciplinaire de religion grecque antique 20 | 2007 Varia Pherekydes’ Daktyloi Ritual, technology, and the Presocratic perspective Sandra Blakely Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/kernos/161 DOI: 10.4000/kernos.161 ISSN: 2034-7871 Publisher Centre international d'étude de la religion grecque antique Printed version Date of publication: 1 January 2007 ISSN: 0776-3824 Electronic reference Sandra Blakely, “Pherekydes’ Daktyloi”, Kernos [Online], 20 | 2007, Online since 15 March 2011, connection on 26 February 2021. URL: http://journals.openedition.org/kernos/161 ; DOI: https:// doi.org/10.4000/kernos.161 This text was automatically generated on 26 February 2021. Kernos Pherekydes’ Daktyloi 1 Pherekydes’ Daktyloi Ritual, technology, and the Presocratic perspective Sandra Blakely Introduction: Classics and the Evolutionary paradigm 1 Western culture is traditionally ill equipped to understand the intersection of ritual and technology. Pfaffenberger, Killick, and Lansing have observed the causes, and what is lost by failing to shake these off.1 Because these activities occupy different categories in the industrialized world, attempts to interpret their coincidence in other cultures lean to the dismissive. They are regarded as a reflection of the earliest stages of invention, compensatory appeals to the divine that reflect incomplete mastery of technological processes. The combination is often called magic by both practitioners and academics. Magic has been traditionally synonymous with primitivism; an evolutionary model suggests that such superstitions evaporate as technology is mastered, and linger only in folk tales and half-remembered superstitions.2 The cost of this paradigm is substantial. Emphasizing the movement into subsequent intellectual paradigms, it reduces attention to symbols in context.
    [Show full text]
  • The Transforma Ion of Neolithic Socie
    The Transformation of Neolithic Societies An Eastern Danish Perspective on the 3rd Millennium BC Iversen, Rune Publication date: 2015 Document version Other version Citation for published version (APA): Iversen, R. (2015). The Transformation of Neolithic Societies: An Eastern Danish Perspective on the 3rd Millennium BC. Jysk Arkaeologisk Selskab. Jysk Arkæologisk Selskabs Skrifter Vol. 88 Download date: 27. sep.. 2021 The Transformaion of Neolithic Socieies An Eastern Danish Perspecive on the 3rd Millennium BC Rune Iversen The Transformaion of Neolithic Socieies 1 The Transformaion of Neolithic Socieies An Eastern Danish Perspecive on the 3rd Millennium BC Rune Iversen Jutland Archaeological Society 3 The Transformaion of Neolithic Socieies An Eastern Danish Perspecive on the 3rd Millennium BC Rune Iversen © The author and Jutland Archaeological Society 2015 ISBN 978-87-88415-99-5 ISSN 0107-2854 Jutland Archaeological Society Publicaions vol. 88 Layout and cover: Louise Hilmar English revision: Anne Bloch and David Earle Robinson Printed by Narayana Press Paper: BVS mat, 130 g Published by: Jutland Archaeological Society Moesgaard DK-8270 Højbjerg Distributed by: Aarhus University Press Langelandsgade 177 DK-8200 Aarhus N Published with inancial support from: Dronning Margrethe II’s Arkæologiske Fond Farumgaard-Fonden and Lillian og Dan Finks Fond Cover: The Stuehøj (Harpagers Høj) passage grave, Ølstykke, Zealand Photo by: Jesper Donnis 4 Contents Preface ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Princeton/Stanford Working Papers in Classics
    Princeton/Stanford Working Papers in Classics Coin quality, coin quantity, and coin value in early China and the Roman world Version 2.0 September 2010 Walter Scheidel Stanford University Abstract: In ancient China, early bronze ‘tool money’ came to be replaced by round bronze coins that were supplemented by uncoined gold and silver bullion, whereas in the Greco-Roman world, precious-metal coins dominated from the beginnings of coinage. Chinese currency is often interpreted in ‘nominalist’ terms, and although a ‘metallist’ perspective used be common among students of Greco-Roman coinage, putatively fiduciary elements of the Roman currency system are now receiving growing attention. I argue that both the intrinsic properties of coins and the volume of the money supply were the principal determinants of coin value and that fiduciary aspects must not be overrated. These principles apply regardless of whether precious-metal or base-metal currencies were dominant. © Walter Scheidel. [email protected] How was the valuation of ancient coins related to their quality and quantity? How did ancient economies respond to coin debasement and to sharp increases in the money supply relative to the number of goods and transactions? I argue that the same answer – that the result was a devaluation of the coinage in real terms, most commonly leading to price increases – applies to two ostensibly quite different monetary systems, those of early China and the Roman Empire. Coinage in Western and Eastern Eurasia In which ways did these systems differ? 1 In Western Eurasia coinage arose in the form of oblong and later round coins in the Greco-Lydian Aegean, made of electron and then mostly silver, perhaps as early as the late seventh century BCE.
    [Show full text]
  • ARCH 1764 Under the Microscope 250 Years of Brown's Material Past
    ARCH 1764 Under the Microscope 250 Years of Brown’s Material Past Prof. Clyde Briant Office hours Wednesday 4:00-6:00 pm 220 Barus and Holley Prof. Brett Kaufman Office Hours: Tuesdays, 2:00-4:00 pm Rhode Island Hall 007 TA Susan Herringer This presentation and the images within are for educational purposes only, and are not to be distributed Week 10 Ceramics Lecture Ceramics – General Characteristics • Compound between metallic and non-metallic elements • Most common are the oxides, nitrides, carbides – e.g. Al2O3, SiO2, SiC, Si3N4 • Others are clays and minerals • Glass and cement • Carbons General Properties • Strong and stiff • Extremely brittle • Good thermal and electrical insulators • Corrosion resistant Classifications • Clay products – structural clay products (bricks, tiles, sewer pipes) – white wares (porcelain, china, tableware) • Refractories – Silica and alumina mixtures – Used for furnace linings • Abrasives – SiC, WC, Al2O3 • Cements – clay and lime bearing minerals • Advanced ceramics – MEMS, sensors, optical devices MEMS Systems Characteristics of Clays • Basic clay minerals are aluminosilicates such as kaolinite • Hydroplasticity – when water is added they become very plastic; water goes between the sheets and forms a film around the clay particles and lubricates them. • Also contain minerals that are non-plastic such fine quartz. This material fills spaces between the clay particle • Fluxes, such feldspar, melt when heated and form a glass which helps densify the resulting ceramic http://www.ihrdc.com/els/ipims- demo/t26/offline_IPIMS_s23560/resources/da ta/G4105.htm Processing of Clay Products • Hydroplastic forming such as extrusion of the wet clay • Slip casting – http://www.dynacer.com/processing/slip-casting/ • Tape casting http://www.ltcc.org.pl/about-ltcc/tape- casting/ Firing and Drying of Ceramics • Drying – removes the water to produce green ware.
    [Show full text]
  • The Underworld Krater from Altamura
    The Underworld Krater from Altamura The Underworld krater was found in 1847 in Altamura in 1 7 Persephone and Hades Herakles and Kerberos ITALY southeastern Italy. The ancient name of the town is unknown, Hades, ruler of the Underworld, was the brother of Zeus (king of the gods) and Poseidon (god of The most terrifying of Herakles’s twelve labors was to kidnap the guard dog of the Underworld. APULIA Naples but by the fourth century bc it was one of the largest fortified Altamura the sea). He abducted Persephone, daughter of the goddess Demeter, to be his wife and queen. For anyone who attempted to leave the realm of the dead without permission, Kerberos (Latin, Taranto (Taras) m settlements in the region. There is little information about Although Hades eventually agreed to release Persephone, he had tricked her into eating the seeds Cerberus) was a threatening opponent. The poet Hesiod (active about 700 BC) described the e d i t e r of a pomegranate, and so she was required to descend to the Underworld for part of each year. “bronze-voiced” dog as having fifty heads; later texts and depictions give it two or three. r a what else was deposited with the krater, but its scale suggests n e a n Here Persephone sits beside Hades in their palace. s e a that it came from the tomb of a prominent individual whose community had the resources to create and transport such a 2 9 substantial vessel. 2 The Children of Herakles and Megara 8 Woman Riding a Hippocamp Map of southern Italy marking key locations mentioned in this gallery The inhabitants of southeastern Italy—collectively known as The Herakleidai (children of Herakles) and their mother, Megara, are identified by the Greek The young woman riding a creature that is part horse, part fish is a puzzling presence in the Apulians—buried their dead with assemblages of pottery and other goods, and large vessels inscriptions above their heads.
    [Show full text]
  • The Gallic Empire (260-274): Rome Breaks Apart
    The Gallic Empire (260-274): Rome Breaks Apart Six Silver Coins Collection An empire fractures Roman chariots All coins in each set are protected in an archival capsule and beautifully displayed in a mahogany-like box. The box set is accompanied with a story card, certificate of authenticity, and a black gift box. By the middle of the third century, the Roman Empire began to show signs of collapse. A parade of emperors took the throne, mostly from the ranks of the military. Years of civil war and open revolt led to an erosion of territory. In the year 260, in a battle on the Eastern front, the emperor Valerian was taken prisoner by the hated Persians. He died in captivity, and his corpse was stuffed and hung on the wall of the palace of the Persian king. Valerian’s capture threw the already-fractured empire into complete disarray. His son and co-emperor, Gallienus, was unable to quell the unrest. Charismatic generals sought to consolidate their own power, but none was as powerful, or as ambitious, as Postumus. Born in an outpost of the Empire, of common stock, Postumus rose swiftly through the ranks, eventually commanding Roman forces “among the Celts”—a territory that included modern-day France, Belgium, Holland, and England. In the aftermath of Valerian’s abduction in 260, his soldiers proclaimed Postumus emperor. Thus was born the so-called Gallic Empire. After nine years of relative peace and prosperity, Postumus was murdered by his own troops, and the Gallic Empire, which had depended on the force of his personality, began to crumble.
    [Show full text]
  • 2Nd Half of the 5Th Millennium BC) and Their Aftermath
    Syria Archéologie, art et histoire 90 | 2013 Dossier : Recherches actuelles sur l’occupation des périphéries désertiques de la Jordanie aux périodes protohistoriques Disappeared by Climate Change. The Shepherd nd Cultures of Qulban Ceni Murra (2 Half of the th 5 Millennium BC) and their Aftermath Hans Georg K. Gebel et Hamzeh M. Mahasneh Édition électronique URL : https://journals.openedition.org/syria/1739 DOI : 10.4000/syria.1739 ISSN : 2076-8435 Éditeur IFPO - Institut français du Proche-Orient Édition imprimée Date de publication : 1 janvier 2013 Pagination : 127-158 ISBN : 9782351593905 ISSN : 0039-7946 Référence électronique Hans Georg K. Gebel et Hamzeh M. Mahasneh, « Disappeared by Climate Change. The Shepherd Cultures of Qulban Ceni Murra (2nd Half of the 5th Millennium BC) and their Aftermath », Syria [En ligne], 90 | 2013, mis en ligne le 01 juillet 2016, consulté le 25 août 2021. URL : http:// journals.openedition.org/syria/1739 ; DOI : https://doi.org/10.4000/syria.1739 © Presses IFPO DISAPPEARED BY CLIMATE CHANGE THE SHEPHERD CULTURES OF QULBAN BENI MURRA (2nd HALF OF THE 5th MILLENNIUM BC) AND THEIR AFTERMATH 1 Hans Georg K. GEBEL 2 & Hamzeh M. MAHASNEH 3 Résumé – Le phénomène funéraire attesté dans le sud-est de la Jordanie témoigne d’une phase d’occupation méconnue de la région au cours du milieu de l’Holocène, en lien avec un mode de vie pastoral basé sur l’exploitation des ressources en eau des puits (« Early Mid-Holocene pastoral well cultures », 4500-4000 BC). À titre d’hypothèse, cette phase précoce d’occupation a pu aboutir au développement des premières « cultures des oasis » de la péninsule Arabique (« Oasis cultures », 4000-35000/3000 BC).
    [Show full text]
  • Piece Mold, Lost Wax & Composite Casting Techniques of The
    Piece Mold, Lost Wax & Composite Casting Techniques of the Chinese Bronze Age Behzad Bavarian and Lisa Reiner Dept. of MSEM College of Engineering and Computer Science September 2006 Table of Contents Abstract Approximate timeline 1 Introduction 2 Bronze Transition from Clay 4 Elemental Analysis of Bronze Alloys 4 Melting Temperature 7 Casting Methods 8 Casting Molds 14 Casting Flaws 21 Lost Wax Method 25 Sanxingdui 28 Environmental Effects on Surface Appearance 32 Conclusion 35 References 36 China can claim a history rich in over 5,000 years of artistic, philosophical and political advancement. As well, it is birthplace to one of the world's oldest and most complex civilizations. By 1100 BC, a high level of artistic and technical skill in bronze casting had been achieved by the Chinese. Bronze artifacts initially were copies of clay objects, but soon evolved into shapes invoking bronze material characteristics. Essentially, the bronze alloys represented in the copper-tin-lead ternary diagram are not easily hot or cold worked and are difficult to shape by hammering, the most common techniques used by the ancient Europeans and Middle Easterners. This did not deter the Chinese, however, for they had demonstrated technical proficiency with hard, thin walled ceramics by the end of the Neolithic period and were able to use these skills to develop a most unusual casting method called the piece mold process. Advances in ceramic technology played an influential role in the progress of Chinese bronze casting where the piece mold process was more of a technological extension than a distinct innovation. Certainly, the long and specialized experience in handling clay was required to form the delicate inscriptions, to properly fit the molds together and to prevent them from cracking during the pour.
    [Show full text]
  • A Masterpiece of Ancient Greece
    Press Release A Masterpiece of Ancient Multimedia Greece: a World of Men, Feb. 01 - Sept. 01 2013 Gods, and Heroes DNP, Gotanda Building, Tokyo Louvre - DNP Museum Lab Tenth presentation in Tokyo The tenth Louvre - DNP Museum Lab presentation, which closes the second phase of this partnership between the Louvre and Dai Nippon Printing Co., Ltd (DNP), invites visitors to discover the art of ancient Greece, a civilization which had a significant impact on Western art and culture. They will be able to admire four works from the Louvre's Greek art collection, and in particular a ceramic masterpiece known as the Krater of Antaeus. This experimental exhibition features a series of original multimedia displays designed to enhance the observation and understanding of Greek artworks. Three of the displays designed for this presentation are scheduled for relocation in 2014 to the Louvre in Paris. They will be installed in three rooms of the Department of Greek, Etruscan and Roman Red-figure calyx krater Signed by the painter Euphronios, attributed to the Antiquities, one of which is currently home to the Venus de Milo. potter Euxitheos. Athens, c. 515–510 BC. Clay The first two phases of this project, conducted over a seven-year Paris, Musée du Louvre. G 103 period, have allowed the Louvre and DNP to explore new © Photo DNP / Philippe Fuzeau approaches to art using digital and imaging technologies; the results have convinced them of the interest of this joint venture, which they now intend to pursue along different lines. Location : Louvre – DNP Museum Lab Ground Floor, DNP - Gotanda 3-5-20 Nishi-Gotanda, Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo The "Krater of Antaeus", one of the Louvre's must-see masterpieces, Opening period : provides a perfect illustration of the beauty and quality of Greek Friday February 1 to Sunday September 1, ceramics.
    [Show full text]
  • The Architecture and Pottery of a Late 3Rd Millennium BC Residential Quarter at Tell Hamoukar, Northeastern Syria
    The Architecture and Pottery of a Late 3rd Millennium BC Residential Quarter at Tell Hamoukar, Northeastern Syria The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Colantoni, C., and J. A. Ur. 2011. The Architecture and Pottery of a Late 3rd Millennium BC Residential Quarter at Tell Hamoukar, Northeastern Syria. Iraq 73:21-69 Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:5342153 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA VOLUME LXXIII • 2011 CONTENTS Editorial iii Obituaries: Dr Donny George Youkhanna, Mrs Rachel Maxwell-Hyslop v Jason Ur, Philip Karsgaard and Joan Oates: The spatial dimensions of early Mesopotamian urbanism: The Tell Brak suburban survey, 2003–2006 1 Carlo Colantoni and Jason Ur: The architecture and pottery of a late third-millennium residential quarter at Tell Hamoukar, north-eastern Syria 21 David Kertai: Kalæu’s palaces of war and peace: Palace architecture at Nimrud in the ninth century bc 71 Joshua Jeffers: Fifth-campaign reliefs in Sennacherib’s “Palace Without Rival” at Nineveh 87 M. P. Streck and N. Wasserman: Dialogues and riddles: Three Old Babylonian wisdom texts 117 Grégory Chambon and Eleanor Robson: Untouchable or unrepeatable? The upper end of the Old Babylonian metrological systems for capacity
    [Show full text]