DOCSLIB.ORG

Exec Summary/Web

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Exec Summary/Web Executive summary THIS REPORT is concerned with the problems caused by the proliferation of small arms and light weapons (SALW) in the South Caucasus. Levels of SALW possession remain very high, reflecting the continued atmosphere of insecurity: conflicts remain unresolved, crime is widespread and people do not always feel they can trust the state to protect them. In such circumstances, SALW are seen as protection against these unpredictable forces.Yet SALW proliferation is also a cause of insecurity in itself, heightening fears of further violence both between and within societies. Although SALW proliferation in the Caucasus is recognised as a serious security concern, there has been little detailed analysis of its dimensions: How many weapons are in circulation? How were these weapons acquired, and which types of guns are widespread? What role do guns play in society? This report seeks to find some answers to these questions by exploring the dynamics of SALW proliferation in the region and rooting it in the context of the local security environment. It is comprised of seven case studies written by local researchers in the Caucasus, complemented by a chapter on the view from Moscow. It is difficult to get even approximate figures of the number of SALW in circulation in the South Caucasus. The major source of SALW proliferation was the stores of the Soviet Army as the Soviet Union collapsed, and the arms of the Transcaucasian Military District were divided amongst the newly independent republics, breakaway regions, paramilitary organisations and individuals by a combination of legal and illegal means. This period was so chaotic that it is not always possible to establish how many weapons ended up where. Although the states of the region have had some success in establishing control, disbanding paramilitary organisations and collecting or registering weapons held by the civilian population, concrete information about the SALW situation remains scarce, and legislation to regulate the possession and use of SALW is weak. Information on weapons under state control is usually secret, and estimates of the amount in illegal circulation vary considerably. The authors demonstrate that there is no single ‘problem’ with SALW in the Caucasus – each area has its own specific ‘problems’.Though in some regions of the Caucasus there was a traditional ‘gun culture’,it was not until the late 1980s that civilians began to acquire arms on a large scale, because political conflicts over ethnic identity, territory and survival created a sense that weapons were needed and catalysed the formation of armed groups. This was facilitated by poor stockpile security. Moscow had little idea how vulnerable its military stores were. In the instability of the period, it was quite easy to acquire arms by bribing those responsible for their storage or by violent seizure of the weapons. 2 THE CAUCASUS: ARMED AND DIVIDED · EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Case studies There were few SALW in circulation in Armenia during the Soviet period. SALW proliferation began as a response to rising tension in the largely Armenian-populated Nagorno Karabakh region of Azerbaijan from 1988 onwards. Weapons were acquired from various internal sources, including the army and the Ministry of the Interior. This was not possible in Nagorno Karabakh, where all state sources were under Azerbaijani control. Compared to other states in this post-conflict region, Armenia began early with efforts to disband paramilitary organisations and create a unified military and security structure. This has largely been successful, though it is thought that some political organisations might have dormant paramilitary units.Various arms control and disarmament measures have been put into action. Although crime rates in Armenia are low, the underlying potential for violence is still high, as the shootings in the Armenian Parliament in October 1999 and the December 2002 assassination of television chief Tigran Naghdalian have demonstrated. Traditionally, Azerbaijan was not a nation with a strong ‘gun culture.’When conflict flared up in 1988 over Nagorno Karabakh, local paramilitary groups tried to obtain weapons from wherever they could, in particular from Soviet military stores. In 1992, Azerbaijan acquired a large quantity of arms through the division of Soviet military property in the South Caucasus, and further weapons were obtained through illicit purchases and seizures of Soviet weapons. It is estimated that of the 160,000 units of SALW in Azerbaijan in Soviet times, up to 90,000 may have come into Azerbaijani hands.Yet because of internal political disputes, Azerbaijan remained militarily weak and deeply unstable until Heydar Aliev came to power in 1993. With a ceasefire agreed in Nagorno Karabakh in 1994, the situation began to stabilise from 1995, and the state has had some success in disbanding paramilitary groups, collecting weapons and stemming SALW proliferation. However it is likely that significant amounts of SALW are still in circulation. In the early 1990s, Georgia was host to a number of ethnic and political conflicts, and the state lost control over its law-enforcement and security agencies. This led to a sharp increase in SALW proliferation. The most active period of SALW proliferation occurred when the Soviet military withdrew from the South Caucasus. Most Soviet weapons were transferred to the Georgian MOD, but significant numbers also ended up in the hands of paramilitary organisations. Today, the state remains weak, organised crime is widespread, ethnic conflicts remain unresolved, and the public has little trust in the government security agencies. State bodies are woefully under- funded, and this encourages corruption, as officers supplement their income through bribery and coercion. The ministries themselves have various economic interests which provide extra-budgetary revenue. The Georgian security sector also suffers from weakly co-ordinated and overlapping roles and remits, and is not really subject to civilian control. Even within some areas that Tbilisi supposedly has control over (ie excluding Abkhazia and South Ossetia), there are paramilitary groups and security actors who are beyond the rule of the central government. Some attempts have been made at weapons collection, but have so far had limited success, and there are thought to be up to 40,000 units of SALW still in illegal circulation. When conflict with Georgian forces broke out in August 1992,many Abkhaz were armed only with hunting rifles, though more advanced weapons were soon acquired from Russian troops, either by negotiation or unilateral seizure. The SALW used were mostly of Soviet/Russian origin. Since the conflict ended in 1993, SALW have remained widespread. The local population still feels insecure, and in such circumstances, people are reluctant to hand in their weapons. Tension is particularly high in the Gal(i) region, which lies on the de facto Abkhaz border that forms a ceasefire line with Georgia proper. The government of the unrecognised Republic of Abkhazia has had some success in regulating SALW proliferation. Legal arms sales are better controlled than before, and the MOI keeps a register of all individuals who possess arms. SAFERWORLD ARMS & SECURITY PROGRAMME 3 Legislation has been passed on the possession and trafficking of firearms. However, whenever tension escalates at the border, guns again become more visible in society. The main source of weapons in South Ossetia during the conflict with Georgian forces in the early 1990s was Chechnya, but towards the end of the conflict arms were also obtained from Russian troops in North Ossetia. Following the end of the conflict in 1992, the unrecognised Republic of South Ossetia began to construct its own security structures. The government has made some attempts to control SALW proliferation and collect weapons from the population, as has the OSCE, though these programmes have had limited success. In North Ossetia it was much easier to acquire weapons from Russian military sources than in the South. North Ossetia fought a short war against the Ingush in 1992, and though relations between the two are now stable, North Ossetia is still very sensitive to events elsewhere in the North Caucasus. Recently, however, the increase in Russian military activity in the region has acted as a stabilising factor. Unofficial estimates of the amount of SALW in North Ossetia range between 20,000 and 50,000. In Dagestan, an autonomous republic of the Russian Federation, there is a strong ‘gun culture’, and many people kept arms even in Soviet times. Arms are now very widespread. The main source of weapons currently appears to be Chechnya. In the early 1990s, Dagestan developed unique political institutions to suit its ethnic diversity. These institutions, combined with the influence of traditional clan communities known as jama’ats, were successful in preventing tensions in the region escalating into war. Recently, Moscow’s influence in the area has increased, prompting fears that inter- ference from the centre could undermine this stability. There are four federal brigades on Dagestani territory, and also Border Guard troops.Yet there are also a number of informal paramilitary groups who are loyal to individual politicians and leaders and a number of Chechen militants in the republic. The Dagestani government has at times undertaken attempts to collect weapons and disarm informal groups, but these are generally perceived as attempts by one political faction to disarm another faction, rather than initiatives that will benefit the whole society. As the Soviet Union collapsed, Moscow’s initial policy was to keep as many SALW under its control as possible, but significant quantities of weapons were stolen from Soviet/Russian military bases and arms stores. In 1992, a large amount of weapons was transferred legally according to agreements between Moscow and the newly independ- ent states on the division of Soviet military property. It is estimated that overall the states and unrecognised entities of the South Caucasus acquired more than 260,000 units of SALW.The Russian government has no definite policy concerning SALW proliferation in the South Caucasus.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Saferworld-In-Kenya.Pdf
    SAFERWORLDKenya Introduction Kenya is a multi-ethnic country that experiences several It is ten years since Kenya adopted a new constitution that set Competition between communities and clans We have suffered all forms of types of overlapping conflict. These include conflict over in motion a devolution of power to newly created counties. for political supremacy has characterised the conflicts! And now the political landscape since independence and resources, cycles of election-related violence, sexual and The outcomes of devolution so far have been mixed. While al-Shabaab attacks have made gender-based violence, increasing numbers of attacks there have been benefits, it has also created new centres of remains the major challenge to stability in Kenya. by non-state armed groups, and violence associated with power, and some communities remain marginalised from Violence involving non-state armed groups also it worse. In fact, the focus law enforcement, including extra-judicial killings by the political processes. This has led to conflicts both within undermines stability, both in coastal and north- now is not on ethnic conflict police and attacks on police officers. counties over local political positions and between counties eastern areas of the country and increasingly anymore, the main source of over access to natural resources, while weak accountability in urban areas. The impact of the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) has reinforced threat now is al-Shabaab. mechanisms have allowed corruption to thrive. Large-scale these conflict dynamics. For instance, sexual and gender- infrastructure projects and oil and gas exploration have taken A member of the National Assembly, Mandera North, based violence (including by law enforcement officers) during a donor consultative meeting, February 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Written Evidence Submitted by Saferworld
    NSM0016 Written evidence submitted by Saferworld Introduction 1. When the Integrated Security, Defence and Foreign Policy Review (or Integrated Review) is published, the UK Government will have to begin the much harder, and more important task of implementing it. This requires moving beyond positive policy documents to ensure the mechanisms of government work effectively. Given that, this submission will explore: how the UK can make more coherent policy; how the UK can measure success; and the role of oversight. 2. In doing so, this submission focuses on four of the questions posed by the Committee in its Call for Evidence: How well the National Security Council and/or Cabinet Office ensures that preparedness plans are resourced and exercised, and how their lessons are learned/implemented? How the NSC maintains its centrality in the policy-making process, sets ministerial direction and oversees implementation of national security decisions? The role of key government departments and agencies in national security policy-making. The coherence of the NSC committee structures, as reshaped in this parliament and further revised to address Covid. Key points Addressing divergences in language, culture and planning processes between departments will be important for creating more coherent foreign policy – as will ensuring the long-term vision and approach of the Department for International Development (DfID) is not lost with the merger. Continued problems remain in measuring the impact of UK activities. The focus on short-term objectives (such as building influence or countering certain armed groups), can hinder the ability to measure the UK’s impact on the drivers of instability.
    [Show full text]
  • Life on the Boundary Line the Future of Security in Shida Kartli
    REPORT Life on the boundary line The future of security in Shida Kartli Malte Viefhues and David Wood October 2010 Life on the boundary line The future of security in Shida Kartli Malte Viefhues and David Wood SAFERWORLD OCTOBER 2010 Acknowledgements This report was written by Malte Viefhues and David Wood. It is based on quantitative and qualitative data gathered by the Caucasus Research Resource Centers (CRRC) in July and August 2010 as part of Saferworld’s regional programme to increase under- standing of, and responsiveness to, the safety and security needs of conflict-affected communities. In Shida Kartli, Saferworld is working in partnership with the Caucasus Institute for Peace Democracy and Development (CIPDD). Activities in Shida Kartli, including this report, have been funded by the European Union through the Instrument for Stability. This report was copy-edited by Emily Speers Mears. © Saferworld, October 2010. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without full attribution. Saferworld welcomes and encourages the utilisation and dissemination of the material included in this publication. Contents Executive summary i The needs of conflict-affected communities i Personal safety and the role of security providers ii The potential for increased tension and a return to violence ii Contact, trust and confidence across the divide iii 1. Introduction 1 Community-based approaches to security 2 Research areas 2 2. The needs of conflict-affected communities 4 Who lives in the communities and how do they live? 4 What are the critical needs facing communities? 6 How is the situation in communities changing? 8 Summary and conclusions 9 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Cover A4 Eng
    February 2007 Small arms and human security in Kosovo An agenda for action VENDiSIGURTË BEZBEDNOMESTO S A F E P L A C E The Forum for Civic Initiatives (FIQ) is a Kosovar non-governmental organisation promoting the involvement of Kosovar citizens in social and decision-making processes through programmes designed to focus attention on the values and functioning of an open and democratic society. Saferworld is an independent non-governmental organisation that works with governments and civil society internationally to research, promote and implement new strategies to increase human security and prevent armed violence. Small arms and human security in Kosovo An agenda for action Acknowledgements This briefing note was prepared by Astrit Istrefi (Forum for Civic Initiatives) and Anna Richards, Simon Rynn, Henry Smith and Juliana Sokolová (Saferworld). SAFEPLACE | Building security in Kosovo 3 1. Introduction There can be no doubt that the proliferation and study jointly conducted by the non-governmental misuse of small arms and light weapons (SALW) organisations Forum for Civic Initiatives (FIQ) and poses a fundamental challenge to the stability of Saferworld between February and June 2006 at Kosovo. This challenge will come into sharper the request of the United Nations Development focus as the decision on Final Status approaches. Programme (UNDP) Kosovo and the South Eastern Underlying this is the fact that exercising control and Eastern Europe Clearinghouse for the Control over SALW in Kosovo since the end of the conflict of Small Arms
    [Show full text]
  • We Won't Wait: As War Ravages Yemen, Its Women Strive to Build
    OXFAM AND SAFERWORLD BRIEFING PAPER 30 JANUARY 2017 An Oxfam Community Health Volunteer speaks at a public health promotion event to celebrate Global Handwashing Day in Taiz. Photo: Oxfam WE WON’T WAIT As war ravages Yemen, its women strive to build peace Conflict in Yemen has left thousands dead, millions homeless or hungry, and an economy in ruins. But hopes for peace talks are fading and a new approach is needed. Women and girls are particularly affected by the conflict and have a crucial role to play in building peace at the local level. Despite some efforts to assist them, women are not receiving enough practical support and diplomatic commitment. Such backing is necessary to bridge the gap between local, national and international peace talks. This is essential for a viable and inclusive peace process that yields lasting results. www.oxfam.org SUMMARY ‘I hope my children are able to return home and complete their schooling. I don’t want them to become soldiers to kill other people, even if they are their enemies,’ says Asmaa, a mother of three forced from her home due to intense cross-border fighting between Yemen and Saudi Arabia. The current conflict between the internationally recognized government (supported by a coalition of Arabian Gulf states led by Saudi Arabia), and opposition forces known as the Houthis (supported by the General People’s Council, or GPC, which is affiliated with the previous president Ali Abdullah Saleh), has resulted in a humanitarian catastrophe that will be felt for decades. More than 10 million Yemenis are in acute need of humanitarian aid.
    [Show full text]
  • Towards an International Arms Trade Treaty (ATT)
    Towards an International Arms Trade Treaty (ATT) “The idea is simple: require our countries not to transfer weapons to states, groups or individuals if there is reason to believe the weapons will be used to violate human rights or existing international law… An Arms Trade Treaty would make legal ties out of the moral ties by which we already know we must abide.” Dr. Óscar Arias Sánchez, Nobel Laureate and President of Costa Rica The need for an ATT None of the major challenges facing the international community today, from the humanitarian disaster in Darfur, to combating the threat of terrorism and improving prospects for development in Africa, can be resolved without controlling the spread of armaments. With no international legally-binding controls on the import and export of arms, weapons are able to move easily across the world to regions of conflict and to countries notorious for human rights abuses. An ATT would fill this gap, helping to prevent weapons being so easily transferred across the globe. What would an ATT do? An ATT would establish legally-binding international controls, based on existing commitments under international law, on the import and export of arms and set out a practical mechanism for their application. Recent progress towards achieving an ATT Last year, 153 governments voted in favour of a resolution mandating a start to international discussions on an ATT. Proposed by the UK and six other states, this landmark resolution sets out a process for the UN to consider the scope, feasibility and draft parameters of a legally-binding ATT.
    [Show full text]
  • Policy Brief and Accompanying Report Were Drawn from Security and Livelihoods
    peOpLe’s peacemaKIng perspectIves may 2012 nagorny Karabakh conflict and frontline areas Over the past twO decades progress on finding a resolution to the Nagorny Karabakh Key OutcOmes (NK) conflict has proved elusive. The unresolved conflict continues to evolve and pose persistent n cBms need to happen, where and shifting challenges on the ground, including insecurity, long-term displacement, ingrained possible, independently of the mistrust and serious limits on development and regional opportunities. Since fighting ended broader more intractable political in 1994, there has been an uneasy situation of ‘no war, no peace’ between Armenians and frameworks, to help create the Azerbaijanis. conditions for a sustainable peace agreement. The geography of the NK conflict has resulted in two distinct border contexts (see map). One features a heavily militarised and entrenched Line of Contact (LOC) along a fiercely contested n the eu can and should play a de facto border deep inside internationally recognised Azerbaijani territory, where mostly one more active role in promoting the side (Azerbaijan) has a civilian population. The second features civilian populations living on practical benefits of cBms for either side of the state border between Armenia and Azerbaijan, which although also closed conflict-affected people, as part of and militarised is less tense and offers more opportunities for mutually beneficial cooperation. its support for the OSCE Minsk Group, and challenge more the use of militant This brief highlights the potential for a number of key confidence building measures (CBMs); rhetoric. both military (joint investigation, sniper withdrawal) and civilian (resource management). n Local people living near the Line of Military CBMs are clearly required and expected by the international community; without contact require special attention cooperation on them, the sides are only undermining their own international standing.
    [Show full text]
  • Whatsapp Peacebuilding Courses: Strengthening the Role of Young People in Kyrgyzstan
    Project profile WhatsApp peacebuilding courses: strengthening the role of young people in Kyrgyzstan Introduction In 2018 Saferworld, the International Debate Education Association Central Asia, International Center Interbilim and Foundation for Tolerance International – with the support of the United Nations Peacebuilding Fund – launched a project to strengthen the role of young people in Kyrgyzstan to promote peace and security. The project aims to facilitate safe dialogue spaces for young women and men in Kyrgyzstan to collectively identify and articulate their peace and security concerns, support youth to advocate for action and accountability from their authorities, and create opportunities for their meaningful participation in decision-making processes. The project also aims to facilitate the youth-led report in Kyrgyzstan on young people’s perceptions of the government’s progress on goals related to youth, gender, peace and security under the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. To ensure that the project supports as many young people as possible, including in remote areas of Kyrgyzstan, Saferworld aims to run peacebuilding courses via WhatsApp for 100–180 young people aged between 17 and 25. Project WhatsApp peacebuilding courses: Background strengthening the role of young people in Kyrgyzstan Young people, who constitute more than a third of Kyrgyzstan’s population, face various challenges including a lack of employment and development opportunities, Project locations limited access to services, and marginalisation within their Osh, Batken, Jalal-Abad and Chui districts communities. Living in this environment, young women and men appear to be excluded from major socio-economic and political life in Kyrgyzstan, and are often divided along Donor geographical, ethnic, religious and gender lines.
    [Show full text]
  • The Arms Trade Treaty Working to Prevent BRIEFING Armed Violence
    2008 Y ar U febr “The idea is simple: require our countries not to transfer weapons to states, groups or individuals if there is reason to believe the weapons will be used to violate human rights or existing international law… An Arms Trade Treaty would make legal ties out of the moral ties by which we already know we must abide.” Dr Óscar Arias Sánchez, Nobel Laureate and President of Costa Rica The Arms Trade Treaty Working to prevent BRIEFING armed violence This briefing summarises the progress made so far conventional arms transfer controls at sub-regional and regional levels. on reaching an international Arms Trade Treaty (ATT) An effective, legally-binding ATT would and outlines the next steps of the process for 2008. ensure that these existing efforts are not undermined by the lack of a consistent, comprehensive global framework. States have a right to self-defence and regions have agreements in place to a legitimate need to retain arms for regulate the international transfer of “…the absence of a universal defence and security. However, the arms, many of these fail to fully reflect and inclusive system assuring irresponsible and poorly regulated trade states’ obligations under international high basic standards governing in arms fuels conflict, destabilises entire law and are often poorly enforced. regions, undermines sustainable develop- There is also a significant number of the import, export and transfer ment and contributes to human rights states that are not party to any regional of conventional arms is a abuses and violations of international or multilateral agreements to control the contributory factor to conflict, humanitarian law.
    [Show full text]
  • Violence Against Women in Egypt Prospects for Improving Police Response
    SAFERWORLD PREVENTING VIOLENT CONFLICT. BUILDING SAFER LIVES SAFERWORLD PREVENTING VIOLENT CONFLICT. BUILDING SAFER LIVES REPORT SAFERWORLD PREVENTING VIOLENT CONFLICT. BUILDING SAFER LIVES SAPRViolenceEVENTINGF VIOLENTERW CONFLICT. BUILDINGORLD SAFER LIVEagainstS women in Egypt Prospects for improving police response June 2015 Violence against women in Egypt Prospects for improving police response SAFERWORLD JUNE 2015 Acknowledgements This report was written by Nadine Marroushi. With thanks to Laleh Khalili, Graham Mathias, Gary White and Hannah Wright for invaluable comments and feedback. All views and any remaining errors in the report are the sole responsibility of Saferworld. © Saferworld, June 2015. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without full attribution. Saferworld welcomes and encourages the utilisation and dissemination of the material included in this publication. Contents Introduction 1 1 Violence against women in Egypt 3 Mob sexual assaults: Putting a spotlight on VAW in Egypt 3 An inadequate criminal justice response 4 A new era? 6 2 A new initiative: The Violence Against Women (VAW) Unit 7 Composition of the VAW unit 8 The VAW unit in practice 8 Civil society cooperation with the VAW unit 9 Challenges for the VAW unit 10 3 Tackling violence against women in Egypt: Beyond the VAW unit 12 The state’s role in perpetrating violence against women 13 Conclusion
    [Show full text]
  • Arms Trade Treaty: Sierra Leone National Action Plan
    Arms Trade Treaty Sierra Leone national action plan Introduction THE NATIONAL ACTION PLAN (NAP) is part of an Arms Trade Treaty (ATT) Voluntary Trust Fund project developed and implemented by the Sierra Leone National Commission on Small Arms (SLeNCSA) in partnership with Saferworld. Upon delivery of all the elements identified in the NAP, Sierra Leone will be in full compliance with the Treaty, which has been a legal obligation of the country since the ATT entered into force in December 2014 (Sierra Leone was one of the Arms Trade Treaty Treaty’s 50 founding States Parties). Sierra Leone national action plan In recent years Sierra Leone has made significant national strides to regulate and control the movement, ownership and use of small arms and light weapons (SALW) and their ammunition, including through its active engagement with the Economic Community of West African States Convention on Small Arms and Light Weapons, their Ammunition and other Related Materials. Sierra Leone’s enthusiasm for a responsibly regulated trade in conventional arms can be understood given its first-hand experience of the devastating consequences that can flow from an out-of-control arms trade. In some ways Sierra Leone is already leading the way in Africa with respect to the ATT. It is, for example, one of only two African states to have produced all the reports required under the Treaty and to have placed them in the public domain. However, as was clear when it ratified the ATT, Sierra Leone is not yet in a position to implement everything in the Treaty. For example, existing legislation regulating the cross-border trade in arms is focused on SALW, to the extent that major conventional military items – such as aircraft, vehicles and vessels – are substantially under-regulated.
    [Show full text]
  • After the 2014 Escalation: the Front Line Between Armenia and Azerbaijan Overview and Key Outcomes
    JANUARY 2015 After the 2014 escalation: The front line between Armenia and Azerbaijan Overview and Key Outcomes OVER THE LAST TWO DECADES, the standoff between Armenians and Azerbaijanis has often been characterised as ‘no war, no peace’ as there has been little progress on resolving Armenia-Azerbaijan: the Nagorny Karabakh (NK) conflict. The unresolved conflict continues to pose ongoing and Protect Civilians Project evolving challenges on the ground, including insecurity, long-term displacement, and ingrained This study was made possible by mistrust. the support of the Swiss Federal In 2014, however, the situation escalated towards ‘more war and less peace’, as both Department of Foreign Affairs. It is Azerbaijani and Armenian villagers describe it. The year was marked by increased fighting, part of Saferworld’s project, jointly implemented with Civil Society more human loss and damage, and several major security incidents. Institute (Yerevan) and Society for One group particularly hit hard by this escalation are ordinary Azerbaijanis and Armenians Humanitarian Research (Baku), living on either side of the border. Communities on both sides report loss and injury and a which aims to study and publicising great increase of worry and fear. Parents are worried about their children’s safety. The fighting the security concerns of the has made it hard to continue farming, choking the main source of income for most households. communities living near Armenian- Azerbaijani frontlines and add In response, both sides should explore ways of de-escalating the conflict at a local level, so their voice to security provision and that communities are not caught up in spirals of escalation.
    [Show full text]