Emory Law Journal Volume 69 Issue 5 The 2019 Randolph W. Thrower Symposium: Exploring Gun Violence in Modern America 2020 Social Movements and Standing in the American Gun Debate David S. Meyer Kaylin Bourdon Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.emory.edu/elj Recommended Citation David S. Meyer & Kaylin Bourdon, Social Movements and Standing in the American Gun Debate, 69 Emory L. J. 919 (2020). Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.emory.edu/elj/vol69/iss5/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Emory Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Emory Law Journal by an authorized editor of Emory Law Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact
[email protected]. MEYER&BOURDON_8.27.20 8/27/2020 5:25 PM SOCIAL MOVEMENTS AND STANDING IN THE AMERICAN GUN DEBATE† David S. Meyer* Kaylin Bourdon** ABSTRACT Who gets to be heard is a fundamental question in any democracy, and access to the arenas of political debate is every bit as contested as the disputes about policy within. The legal system offers rules of “standing” to determine who can make claims in a courtroom. We think the concept of standing is useful in making sense of access to a range of other political arenas as well. Notably, having an identifiable interest in the outcome of a particular set of decisions, a stake in the outcome, doesn’t necessarily grant a claimant access to an audience. Social movements work to convert stake into standing, and to win access to social and political arenas for distinct constituencies and claimants.