DOCSLIB.ORG

The Acarina Or Mites. a Review of the Group for the Use of Economic

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Historic, archived document Do not assume content reflects current scientific knowledge, policies, or practices I I u£ mi***! Issued December 15, 1915. United States Department of Agriculture, OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY. Report ISTo. 108. [Contribution from the Bureau of Entomology, L..cO. Howard. Chief.] THE ACARINA OR MITES. A REVIEW OF THE GROUP FOR THE USE OF ECONOMIC ENTOMOLOGISTS. BT NATHAN BANKS, Entomological Assistant. WASHINGTON: GOVERNMENT PRINTING OPriCE. 1915. I CONTENTS. Page. Page. Preface 7 Parasitidae 71 Inlrfxliiction 7 Oribatoidea 90 Synopsis of superfamilies 17 Oribatidae 95 Synopsis of families 18 Hoplodermatidae 102 Eupodoidea 20 Labidostommatidae 103 Eupodidse 20 Sarcoptoidea 104 Cn-ptognathidae 23 Tarsonemidte 104 BdelUdae 23 TyrogljT)hidEe 109 Trombidioidea 26 Canestriniidae 118 Cheyletidae 26 Analgesidae 119 Anystidaj 30 Listrophoridae 126 Tetranychidae 32 Sarcoptidae 128 ErythriBidae 38 Cytoleichidae 133 Trombidiidae 41 Demodicoidea 134 Ca^culidae 45 EriophyidaD 134 Ilydrachnoidea 45 Demodicidae 139 llydnu'hnidaj 45 Opilioacaridse ^ 140 Ilalacaridse 54 Uncertain Acari 140 Ixodoidea 56 Collecting, preparing, and rearing mites 141 Parasitoidea 70 List of works useful in the study of American Spcl;corhynchida3 70 Acarina 143 HolothyridiJO 70 Index and generic synonjTny 147 . ^lUd3S . ILLUSTRATIONS. TEXT FIGURES. Page. Page. 1. Dorsal view of a mite 8 Fig. 47. Stigmaeus floridanus: Adult and de- 2. Ventral view of a mite 8 tails 36 3. Palpi of various form^ 9 48. Acheles 37 4. Legs of various mites 10 49. Tetranychoides californica and pal- 5. Anatomy of Paras i^us 11 pus 37 6. 'Emhiy oi Parasitus 12 50. Raphignathus brevis 37 7. A mite, Trombidium: Egg, larva, 51. Tetranychopsis spinosa 37 adult 13 52. Tenuipalpus californicus 3S 8. Venter of an eupodid 20 53. NeophylJobius americanus and claw. 38 9. A mite, AUchus roseus 20 54. Details of Erythraeus 39 10. Cephalothorax of Bimichaelia 21 55. Atomus maculatus 39 11. Dorsal view of the mite Notophal- 56. Leptusof -Eryrtraewsonaplantlouse 39 lus 21 57. Erythraeus simplex and palpus 40 12. Linopodes antennaepes 22 58. Venter of Smaris 41 13. Rhagidia pallida 22 59. Caeculisoma: Tarsus 1 41 14. Tydtus: Beak and leg I, from below. 22 60. Egg of Trombidium 41 15. Eupodes: Legs I and IV 22 61. Eye of Trombidium 41 16. Erynetes concolor: Tarsus and pal- 62. Claws of Trombidium 41 pus --- 22 63. Leg I of Trombidium 42 17. Teneriffia: Palpus 23 64. Mandible and details of Trombid- 18. Cryptognathus lagenu 23 ium 42 19. Venter of a 5(fe?Za 24 65. Larva (leptus) of a Trombidium 42 20. Y.gg oiBdella 24 66. 'Laxva oi Allothrombium and mouth 21. Bdclla peregrina 25 parts 43 22. Bdclla tenella 25 67. Larva of Trombidium from cricket. 44 23. Mandibles and palpus of Cunaxa. 25 68. Trombidium locustarum 44 24. Cheyletussp - 26 69. Palpus of Trombidium giganteum . 44 25. Cheyletus pyriformis: Beak and pal- 70. Palpus of Trombidium magnificum. 44 pus, tip of leg I, and claws of leg II. 26 71. Caeculus americanus 45 26. Cheyletus audax, from below 27 72. Limnochares: Venter 46 27. Chcylcticlla canadensis 28 73. Limnochares: Eyes and dorsal plate 46 28. Chcletopsis norneri 28 74. Eylais sp 46 29. Harpyrynchuslongipilus: Female.. 29 75. Eylais: Eye plate 46 30. Harpyrynchuslongipilus: Larva... 29 76. Genital suckers of hydrachnids 47 31. Psorergates simplex 29 77. Arrenurus sp: Male 47 32. Myohia canadensis 29 78. Arrenurus sp: Palpus 50 33. Picobiahelleri 30 79. .4 rrmttru* sp: Female from below. 50 34. Picobiahelleri: Tarsus and head 30 80. Larva of a hydrachnid 50 35. Venter of Anystis 30 81. Carva of Hydrachna attached to leg 36. Tarsotomus spinatus 31 of an insect; nymph inside 51 37. Pterygosoma texana: Adult and de- 82. Limnesia sp.: Palpus and co.xal tails 31 plates 51 38. Tetranychus bimaculatus 32 83. Tyrrellia circularis 51 39. Details of Tetranychus 32 84. Thyas sp 51 40. Details of Tetranychus 33 85. Mandible of Thyas sp 51 41. Leg of Tetranychus 33 86. Palpus of Thyas sp 51 42. Genital organs of Tetranychus 34 87. Coxal plates of Hygrobates 52 43. Claws of Tetranychus 34 88. Palpus of Hygrobates 52 44. Tetranychus gloveri: Palpus and 89. Palpus oiAtractides 52 mandibular plate 34 90. Coxal plates of Sperchon 52 45. Bryobia pratensis: Female and de- 91. Palpus of Sperchon 52 tails 35 92. Venter of Lebertia 52 46. Bryobia pratensis: Larva 36 93. Piona sp., and palpus above 53 3 . .. REPORT 108, U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Page. Page. Fig. 94. Fiona sp.: Larva 53 Fig. 149. Hacmogamasus americanus 78 95. Ataxsp 53 150. Rhodocarus roseus 78 96. Coxal plates of A tax 53 151. Mcgisthanus floridanus 79 97. Tarsal claw of Atax. 54 152. Iphiopsis sp., caroncle and pcri- 98. Palpus of Atax 54 treme 80 99. Claws of Halacaru^ 54 153. Macrocheles carolinensis: Female... 81 100. IlaJacarus sp 55 154. Macrocheles carolinensis: Venter of 101. Scaptognathus sp 55 female 81 102. Simognathus sp 56 155. Macrocheles spinatus: Legs II and 56 103. A rgas miniatus, from below IV of male : 81 104. Otobius megnini: Nymphal form 156. Caelenopsis americana 82 and details 56 157. Sejus amcricanus 82 105. Omithodorosturicata 57 158. Paragreenia alfkeni 82 106. Ixodes and Dcrmacentor: Ventral fur- 159. Laelaps cchidninus 82 rows 57 160. Parasitus sp 83 107. Ilypostome and mandibles of a tick. 58 101. Parasitus sp. : Nymph 83 108. Ixodes, Margaropus, Amhlyomma, 162. Parasitus sp. : Larva 83 Dcrmacentor, Hxmaphysalis: Stig- 163. Parasitus calcarator 83 mal plates 58 164. Parasitus predator: Leg II of male. 84 Shield of Margaropus annulatus, fe- 165. Hyletastes sp. : Adult and anal plate 84 male 59 106. Hyletastes ovalis 85 110. Margaropus annulatus: Male 59 167. Seiulus quadripilis 85 111. Margaropus annulatus: Larva 59 168. Hypoaspis mexicanus and details ... 86 112. Margaropus annulatus: Claws 60 169. Hypoaspis macropilis and details. 86 113. Margaropus annulatus: Egg 61 170. Antennophorus uhlmanni 87 114. Dermacentor variabilis: Male 61 171. Ant carrying three Antennophori . 87 115. Dermacentor variabilis: Shield of fe- 172. TJroplitella: Details 88 male 62 173. Uropoda: Details 88 116. Dermacentor: Tarsus IV 62 174. Uropoda sp. and pedicel 89 117. Dermacentor albipictus: Male 63 175. Uropoda sp 89 118. Rhipicephalus sanguineus: Shield of 176. Cilliba hirsuta 89 female 63 177. Dinychus americanus 90 119. Rhipicephalus: Palpus 64 178. Details of an oribatid 91 120. Rhipicephalus: Shield of nymph 64 179, Mouth parts of an oribatid 91 121. Rhipicephalus pulchellus: Male 64 180, Galumna sp 92 122. A mblyomma americanum: Engorged 181, Galumna sp: Nymph 92 female 65 182, Galumna hubbardi 92 123. Amhlyomma cajennense: Shield of 183, Galumna persimilis 92 female 65 184. Oribatclla valida 93 124. Amblyomma: Shield of nymph 66 185, Oribatella armata 94 125. Amblyomma: Tarsus IV 67 180, Oribatclla sp 94 120. Ilacmaphysalis chordcilis: Shield of 187, Liacarus nitidus 95 female 67 188, Liacarus carolinensis 97 127. Ixodes: Head 68 1S9, Liacarus sp: Nymph 97 128. Ixodes: Details of Leg 1 68 190. Oribella pilosus 97 129. Ixodes scapularis: Shield of female . 68 191. Notaspis montana 97 1.30. Ixodes marii: Female 69 192. Gymnnbatfs glabcr 98 131. Ixodes: Venter of male 69 193, Oripoda clongata 9S 132. Ccratixodes: Palpi of male and fe- 194, Carabodes lamellatus 98 male 70 195, Oribata graciUpes 99 133. Spclaeorhynchus praccursor 70 196. Oribata sp. : Venter 99 13 J. Ilolothyrus 70 197. Oribata sp. : Claw 100 135. Parasitus: Venter 71 198. Oribata sp.: Larva 1(X) 1.30. Parasitus: Side view 71 199. Oribata minuta 100 137. Spinturnix amcricanus 72 200. Carabodes brcvis 1(X) l.'iK. Spiuturnii: Venter 72 201. Ccphcus marginalis 1(X) 1.39. Prriglischrus j heringi: Female 73 202, Scutoirrtci pctrophagu^ 100 140. Stcrnostomum rh inolethrum 73 203, NcoUodes concentricus 101 111. Pncumonyssus simicola 74 204, Nothruss\).: Venter 101 142. Pncumonyssiis simicola: Larva 74 2a'). Nothrus banksi 101 143. Pncumonyssus: Details 7") 20C). Nothrtis truncatu^ 101 144. Ildlarachiir amrricana: Details 75 207. Nothrus taurinus 101 U.'i. Dtrmnnyssus gnllin.r 76 20S. Ilypochthoniu^ teianus 1 02 lie,. DfTmnnyssnsgallinx: Details 77 209, Iloploderma sphaerula 1 02 147. lAponyxsns nmrricanus 77 210, Phthiracarus sp.: Closed up; ventral 148, Liponyssus: Details 77 view 102 .. ILLUSTRATIONS. Page. Page. Fig. 211. Labidostomma cornuta 103 Fig. 251. A lloptes microphaethon and caroncle 123 212. Labidostomma cornuta: Venter 103 252. Analgcs passerinus: Female 123 213. Pediculoidcs S]}.: Beak and claw... 104 253. A nalgcs passerinus: Male 124 214. Pediculoidcs ventricosus: Female ... 104 254. Mcgninia tyrrclli 124 215. Pediculoidcs ventricosus: Male 104 255. Megninia albidus 124 21G. Pediculoidcs ventricosus: Gravid 256. Pteronyssus tyrrclli 124 female 105 257. Allanalgcs gracilepinnatus 125 217. Siteroptes carnea and claw 105 258. Pterodcctes armatus 125 218. Tarsonemus pallidus 106 259. Rivoltasia bispinosa 126 219. Tarsonemus latu-s: Female 106 260. Schizocarpus mingaudi: Female 126 220. Tarsonemus latus: Male 107 261. Schizocarpus mingaudi: Male and fe- 221. Tarsonemus sp 107 male 127 222. Podapolipus sp.: Male and female. 107 262. Myocoptes clinging to a hair 127 223. Pigmeophorus amcricanus and de- 263. Listrophorus validus 128 tails 107 264. Sarcoptes scabei: Male 128 224. Pigmeophorus amcricanus 108 265. Sarcoptes scabei: Female 128 225. Scutacarus americanus, from below, 266. Leg of a Sarcoptes 129 and claw 108 267. Sarcoptes in her bmrow, and eggs . 129 220. Imparipes sp 108 268. Psoroptes communis var. ovis: Male. 130 227. Tyroglyphus sp 109 269. Psoroptes communis var. ovis: Fe- 228. Hypopus of a Tyroglyphus, from male and caroncle 130 below 110 270. Chorioptes set ifer us 131 229. Histiostoma amcricana 110 271. Notoedres muris 131 230. Beak of Histiostoma amcricana Ill 272. Otodectes cynotis: Female 132 231. Leg I, and tip of mandible of His- 273. Otodectes cynotis: Tip of male abdo- tiostoma amcricana Ill men, and hind legs 132 232.
Recommended publications
  • Mesostigmata No

    Mesostigmata No

    13 (1) · 2013 Christian, A. & K. Franke Mesostigmata No. 24 ............................................................................................................................................................................. 1 – 32 Acarological literature Publications 2013 ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Publications 2012 ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 Publications, additions 2011 ....................................................................................................................................................................... 14 Publications, additions 2010 ....................................................................................................................................................................... 15 Publications, additions 2009 ....................................................................................................................................................................... 16 Publications, additions 2008 ....................................................................................................................................................................... 16 Nomina nova New species ................................................................................................................................................................................................
  • (Acari: Mesostigmata) Raphael De Campos Castilho

    (Acari: Mesostigmata) Raphael De Campos Castilho

    Universidade de São Paulo Escola Superior de Agricultura “Luiz de Queiroz” Taxonomy of Rhodacaroidea mites (Acari: Mesostigmata) Raphael de Campos Castilho Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor in Science. Area of concentration: Entomology Piracicaba 2012 2 Raphael de Campos Castilho Engenheiro Agrônomo Taxonomy of Rhodacaroidea mites (Acari: Mesostigmata) Adviser: Prof. Dr. GILBERTO JOSÉ DE MORAES Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor in Science. Area of concentration: Entomology Piracicaba 2012 Dados Internacionais de Catalogação na Publicação DIVISÃO DE BIBLIOTECA - ESALQ/USP Castilho, Raphael de Campos Taxonomy of Rhodacaroidea mites (Acari: Mesostigmata) / Raphael de Campos Castilho. - - Piracicaba, 2012. 579 p. : il. Tese (Doutorado) - - Escola Superior de Agricultura “Luiz de Queiroz”, 2012. 1. Ácaros predadores 2. Classificação 3. Ácaros de solo 4. Controle biológico I. Título CDD 595.42 C352t “Permitida a cópia total ou parcial deste documento, desde que citada a fonte – O autor” 3 To GOD Source of perseverance and life, To my mother Sonia Regina de Campos For her love, tenderness and comprehension. To my partner Karina Cezarete Semençato for her love, patience and unfailing support to me Offer To Prof. Dr. Gilberto José de Moraes For his valuable guidance, friendship and recognition of my work Special thanks 4 5 Ackanowledgements To Escola Superior de Agricultura ―Luiz de Queiroz‖ (ESALQ), Universidade de São Paulo (USP), and especially to ―Departamento de Entomologia e Acarologia‖ for providing all intellectual and material support necessary for the proper development of this work; I am especially grateful to Carlos H. W.
  • Comparative Functional Morphology of Attachment Devices in Arachnida

    Comparative Functional Morphology of Attachment Devices in Arachnida

    Comparative functional morphology of attachment devices in Arachnida Vergleichende Funktionsmorphologie der Haftstrukturen bei Spinnentieren (Arthropoda: Arachnida) DISSERTATION zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades doctor rerum naturalium (Dr. rer. nat.) an der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel vorgelegt von Jonas Otto Wolff geboren am 20. September 1986 in Bergen auf Rügen Kiel, den 2. Juni 2015 Erster Gutachter: Prof. Stanislav N. Gorb _ Zweiter Gutachter: Dr. Dirk Brandis _ Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 17. Juli 2015 _ Zum Druck genehmigt: 17. Juli 2015 _ gez. Prof. Dr. Wolfgang J. Duschl, Dekan Acknowledgements I owe Prof. Stanislav Gorb a great debt of gratitude. He taught me all skills to get a researcher and gave me all freedom to follow my ideas. I am very thankful for the opportunity to work in an active, fruitful and friendly research environment, with an interdisciplinary team and excellent laboratory equipment. I like to express my gratitude to Esther Appel, Joachim Oesert and Dr. Jan Michels for their kind and enthusiastic support on microscopy techniques. I thank Dr. Thomas Kleinteich and Dr. Jana Willkommen for their guidance on the µCt. For the fruitful discussions and numerous information on physical questions I like to thank Dr. Lars Heepe. I thank Dr. Clemens Schaber for his collaboration and great ideas on how to measure the adhesive forces of the tiny glue droplets of harvestmen. I thank Angela Veenendaal and Bettina Sattler for their kind help on administration issues. Especially I thank my students Ingo Grawe, Fabienne Frost, Marina Wirth and André Karstedt for their commitment and input of ideas.
  • CURRICULUM VITAE Educational History Professional Interests

    CURRICULUM VITAE Educational History Professional Interests

    CURRICULUM VITAE Javad Noei Address: Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Birjand, Birjand, Iran. P.O. Box 9719113944. Office: +98-56 32254044 Email: [email protected]; [email protected] Educational History Ph.D. in Entomology from Guilan University, Rasht, Iran (January 2009−August 2013). Thesis title: Taxonomic study of the terrestrial Parasitengona ectoparasites on arthropoda in Guilan province M.Sc. in Entomology from Guilan University, Rasht, Iran (September 2004−June 2007). Thesis title: Identification of rice storage mites in Guilan province under different storage conditions B.Sc. in Plant Protection from Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran (September 2000−July 2004). Professional Interests Taxonomic study of terrestrial Parasitengona (Acari: Trombidiformes). Publications Congress Noei, J., Hajizadeh, J., Salehi, L. & Ostovan H. (2008) Mesostigmatic stored mites of rice in Guilan province. 18th Iranian Plant Protection Congress, 24–27 August, Iran, Hamedan. Page, 277. Noei, J., Hajizadeh, J., Salehi, L. & Ostovan H. (2008) Prostigmatic stored mites of rice in Guilan province. 18th Iranian Plant Protection Congress, 24–27 August, Iran, Hamedan. Page, 278. Noei, J., Hajizadeh, J., Salehi, L. & Ostovan H. (2009) Introduction of nine rice stored astigmatic mites (Acari: Astigmata) in Guilan province. Iranian Student Congress of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources. Iran, Rasht. Page, 140–141. [In Persian with English summary]. Nazari tajani, M., Hajizadeh, J. & Noei, J. (2011) Twelve species of Phytoseiidae (Acari: Mesostigmata) from citrus orchards of Guilan province, Iran. First Persian Congress of Acarology, 22–23 December, Iran, Kerman. Page, 34. Hajizadeh, J. & Noei, J. (2012) Report of a new family for the mite fauna of Iran: Penthalodidae (Acari, Prostigmata).
  • Gamasid Mites

    Gamasid Mites

    NATIONAL RESEARCH TOMSK STATE UNIVERSITY BIOLOGICAL INSTITUTE RUSSIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCE ZOOLOGICAL INSTITUTE M.V. Orlova, M.K. Stanyukovich, O.L. Orlov GAMASID MITES (MESOSTIGMATA: GAMASINA) PARASITIZING BATS (CHIROPTERA: RHINOLOPHIDAE, VESPERTILIONIDAE, MOLOSSIDAE) OF PALAEARCTIC BOREAL ZONE (RUSSIA AND ADJACENT COUNTRIES) Scientific editor Andrey S. Babenko, Doctor of Science, professor, National Research Tomsk State University Tomsk Publishing House of Tomsk State University 2015 UDK 576.89:599.4 BBK E693.36+E083 Orlova M.V., Stanyukovich M.K., Orlov O.L. Gamasid mites (Mesostigmata: Gamasina) associated with bats (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae, Rhinolophidae, Molossidae) of boreal Palaearctic zone (Russia and adjacent countries) / Scientific editor A.S. Babenko. – Tomsk : Publishing House of Tomsk State University, 2015. – 150 р. ISBN 978-5-94621-523-7 Bat gamasid mites is a highly specialized ectoparasite group which is of great interest due to strong isolation and other unique features of their hosts (the ability to fly, long distance migration, long-term hibernation). The book summarizes the results of almost 60 years of research and is the most complete summary of data on bat gamasid mites taxonomy, biology, ecol- ogy. It contains the first detailed description of bat wintering experience in sev- eral regions of the boreal Palaearctic. The book is addressed to zoologists, ecologists, experts in environmental protection and biodiversity conservation, students and teachers of biology, vet- erinary science and medicine. UDK 576.89:599.4
  • Mesostigmata No

    Mesostigmata No

    16 (1) · 2016 Christian, A. & K. Franke Mesostigmata No. 27 ............................................................................................................................................................................. 1 – 41 Acarological literature .................................................................................................................................................... 1 Publications 2016 ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Publications 2015 ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 9 Publications, additions 2014 ....................................................................................................................................................................... 17 Publications, additions 2013 ....................................................................................................................................................................... 18 Publications, additions 2012 ....................................................................................................................................................................... 20 Publications, additions 2011 ......................................................................................................................................................................
  • Entomopathogenic Fungi and Bacteria in a Veterinary Perspective

    Entomopathogenic Fungi and Bacteria in a Veterinary Perspective

    biology Review Entomopathogenic Fungi and Bacteria in a Veterinary Perspective Valentina Virginia Ebani 1,2,* and Francesca Mancianti 1,2 1 Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Pisa, viale delle Piagge 2, 56124 Pisa, Italy; [email protected] 2 Interdepartmental Research Center “Nutraceuticals and Food for Health”, University of Pisa, via del Borghetto 80, 56124 Pisa, Italy * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +39-050-221-6968 Simple Summary: Several fungal species are well suited to control arthropods, being able to cause epizootic infection among them and most of them infect their host by direct penetration through the arthropod’s tegument. Most of organisms are related to the biological control of crop pests, but, more recently, have been applied to combat some livestock ectoparasites. Among the entomopathogenic bacteria, Bacillus thuringiensis, innocuous for humans, animals, and plants and isolated from different environments, showed the most relevant activity against arthropods. Its entomopathogenic property is related to the production of highly biodegradable proteins. Entomopathogenic fungi and bacteria are usually employed against agricultural pests, and some studies have focused on their use to control animal arthropods. However, risks of infections in animals and humans are possible; thus, further studies about their activity are necessary. Abstract: The present study aimed to review the papers dealing with the biological activity of fungi and bacteria against some mites and ticks of veterinary interest. In particular, the attention was turned to the research regarding acarid species, Dermanyssus gallinae and Psoroptes sp., which are the cause of severe threat in farm animals and, regarding ticks, also pets.
  • Occurrence of Ticks on Mule Deer in Central Utah

    Occurrence of Ticks on Mule Deer in Central Utah

    Great Basin Naturalist Volume 37 Number 3 Article 7 9-30-1977 Occurrence of ticks on mule deer in central Utah Jordan C. Pederson Utah Division of Wildlife Resources, Environmental Studies, Springville, Utah Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn Recommended Citation Pederson, Jordan C. (1977) "Occurrence of ticks on mule deer in central Utah," Great Basin Naturalist: Vol. 37 : No. 3 , Article 7. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn/vol37/iss3/7 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Western North American Naturalist Publications at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Great Basin Naturalist by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. OCCURRENCE OF TICKS ON MULE DEER IN CENTRAL UTAH Jordan C. Pederson' Abstract.— Two species of ticks were collected from mule deer and identified as Dertnacentor alhipictus (Packard) and Ixodes sp. The rate of occurrence of these ticks was found to be 99.6 percent and 0.4 percent, re- spectively. The infestation rate increased from 18.2 percent in January, to 87.5 percent in February, to 100.0 per- cent in March. From January through March 1976, a ens (1967) found this parasite on mule deer mule deer {Odocoileus hemionus Rafi- in Daggett County, Utah, where the pro- nescjue) trapping operation was conducted portion of deer infested with this tick rose by Utah State University, the Cooperative from 37 percent in January to 92 percent in Wildhfe Research Unit, and the Utah State March of 1960.
  • Grape Insects +6134

    Grape Insects +6134

    Ann. Rev. Entomo! 1976. 22:355-76 Copyright © 1976 by Annual Reviews Inc. All rights reserved GRAPE INSECTS +6134 Alexandre Bournier Chaire de Zoologie, Ecole Nationale Superieure Agronornique, 9 Place Viala, 34060 Montpellier-Cedex, France The world's vineyards cover 10 million hectares and produce 250 million hectolitres of wine, 70 million hundredweight of table grapes, 9 million hundredweight of dried grapes, and 2.5 million hundredweight of concentrate. Thus, both in terms of quantities produced and the value of its products, the vine constitutes a particularly important cultivation. THE HOST PLANT AND ITS CULTIVATION The original area of distribution of the genus Vitis was broken up by the separation of the continents; although numerous species developed, Vitis vinifera has been cultivated from the beginning for its fruit and wine producing qualities (43, 75, 184). This cultivation commenced in Transcaucasia about 6000 B.C. Subsequent human migration spread its cultivation, at firstaround the Mediterranean coast; the Roman conquest led to the plant's progressive establishment in Europe, almost to its present extent. Much later, the WesternEuropeans planted the grape vine wherever cultiva­ tion was possible, i.e. throughout the temperate and warm temperate regions of the by NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY on 02/01/10. For personal use only. world: North America, particularly California;South America,North Africa, South Annu. Rev. Entomol. 1977.22:355-376. Downloaded from arjournals.annualreviews.org Africa, Australia, etc. Since the commencement of vine cultivation, man has attempted to increase its production, both in terms of quality and quantity, by various means including selection of mutations or hybridization.
  • VINEYARD BIODIVERSITY and INSECT INTERACTIONS! ! - Establishing and Monitoring Insectariums! !

    VINEYARD BIODIVERSITY and INSECT INTERACTIONS! ! - Establishing and Monitoring Insectariums! !

    ! VINEYARD BIODIVERSITY AND INSECT INTERACTIONS! ! - Establishing and monitoring insectariums! ! Prepared for : GWRDC Regional - SA Central (Adelaide Hills, Currency Creek, Kangaroo Island, Langhorne Creek, McLaren Vale and Southern Fleurieu Wine Regions) By : Mary Retallack Date : August 2011 ! ! ! !"#$%&'(&)'*!%*!+& ,- .*!/'01)!.'*&----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&2 3-! "&(')1+&'*&4.*%5"/0&#.'0.4%/+.!5&-----------------------------------------------------------------------------&6! ! &ABA <%5%+3!C0-72D0E2!AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!F! &A&A! ;D,!*2!G*0.*1%-2*3,!*HE0-3#+3I!AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!J! &AKA! ;#,2!0L!%+D#+5*+$!G*0.*1%-2*3,!*+!3D%!1*+%,#-.!AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!B&! 7- .*+%)!"/.18+&--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&,2! ! ! KABA ;D#3!#-%!*+2%53#-*MH2I!AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!BN! KA&A! O3D%-!C#,2!0L!L0-H*+$!#!2M*3#G8%!D#G*3#3!L0-!G%+%L*5*#82!AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!&P! KAKA! ?%8%53*+$!3D%!-*$D3!2E%5*%2!30!E8#+3!AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!&B! 9- :$"*!.*;&5'1/&.*+%)!"/.18&-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&3<!
  • Life Cycle Studies of Some Antarctic Mites and Description of a New Species, Protereunetes Paulinae Sp

    Life Cycle Studies of Some Antarctic Mites and Description of a New Species, Protereunetes Paulinae Sp

    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Retrospective Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 1968 Life cycle studies of some Antarctic mites and description of a new species, Protereunetes paulinae sp. n. (Acari: Eupodidae) Elmer Elden Gless Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd Part of the Zoology Commons Recommended Citation Gless, Elmer Elden, "Life cycle studies of some Antarctic mites and description of a new species, Protereunetes paulinae sp. n. (Acari: Eupodidae) " (1968). Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 3471. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/3471 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Retrospective Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This dissertation has been microfilmed exactly as received 69-4238 GLESS, Elmer Elden, 1928- LIFE CYCLE STUDIES OF SOME ANTARCTIC MITES AND DESCRIPTION OF A NEW SPECIES, PROTEREUNETES PAULINAE SP. N. (ACARI: EUPODIDAE). Iowa State University, Ph.D., 1968 Zoology University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan LIFE CYCLE STUDIES OF SOME ANTARCTIC MITES AND DESCRIPTION OF A NEW SPECIES, PROTEREUNETES PAULINAE SP. N. (ACARI: EUPODIDAE) by Elmer Elden Gless A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty in Partial Fulfillment of The Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Major Subject: Zoology Approved: Signature was redacted for privacy. In Charge of Major Work Signature was redacted for privacy. Chairman of Major Department Signature was redacted for privacy.
  • In Nests of the Common Mole, Talpa Europaea, in Central Europe

    In Nests of the Common Mole, Talpa Europaea, in Central Europe

    Exp Appl Acarol (2016) 68:429–440 DOI 10.1007/s10493-016-0017-6 Community structure variability of Uropodina mites (Acari: Mesostigmata) in nests of the common mole, Talpa europaea, in Central Europe 1 2 1 Agnieszka Napierała • Anna Ma˛dra • Kornelia Leszczyn´ska-Deja • 3 1,4 Dariusz J. Gwiazdowicz • Bartłomiej Gołdyn • Jerzy Błoszyk1,2 Received: 6 September 2013 / Accepted: 27 January 2016 / Published online: 9 February 2016 Ó The Author(s) 2016. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com Abstract Underground nests of Talpa europaea, known as the common mole, are very specific microhabitats, which are also quite often inhabited by various groups of arthro- pods. Mites from the suborder Uropodina (Acari: Mesostigmata) are only one of them. One could expect that mole nests that are closely located are inhabited by communities of arthropods with similar species composition and structure. However, results of empirical studies clearly show that even nests which are close to each other can be different both in terms of the species composition and abundance of Uropodina communities. So far, little is known about the factors that can cause these differences. The major aim of this study was to identify factors determining species composition, abundance, and community structure of Uropodina communities in mole nests. The study is based on material collected during a long-term investigation conducted in western parts of Poland. The results indicate that the two most important factors influencing species composition and abundance of Uropodina communities in mole nests are nest-building material and depth at which nests are located.