DOCSLIB.ORG

Scoping Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Scoping Report STATE OF VERMONT AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION Scoping Report FOR Chester BF 025-1(45) VT Route 103, BRIDGE 14 Over Williams River and The Green Mountain Railroad July 15, 2019 Contents I. SITE INFORMATION ..................................................................................................................... 3 NEED ..................................................................................................................................................... 3 TRAFFIC ................................................................................................................................................. 4 DESIGN CRITERIA .............................................................................................................................. 4 INSPECTION REPORT SUMMARY ................................................................................................................. 5 HYDRAULICS ........................................................................................................................................... 5 RAILROAD VERTICAL CLEARANCE ................................................................................................................ 5 UTILITIES ................................................................................................................................................ 6 RIGHT‐OF‐WAY ...................................................................................................................................... 6 RESOURCES ............................................................................................................................................. 6 Biological: ............................................................................................................................................ 6 Historic: ............................................................................................................................................... 7 Archaeological: .................................................................................................................................... 7 Hazardous Materials: .......................................................................................................................... 7 Stormwater: ........................................................................................................................................ 7 II. SAFETY ........................................................................................................................................ 8 III. MAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC .......................................................................................................... 8 OFF‐SITE DETOUR .................................................................................................................................... 8 TEMPORARY BRIDGE ................................................................................................................................ 9 PHASED CONSTRUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 9 IV. ALTERNATIVES DISCUSSION ....................................................................................................... 10 NO ACTION .......................................................................................................................................... 10 ALTERNATIVE 1: DECK REPLACEMENT ....................................................................................................... 10 ALTERNATIVE 2: SUPERSTRUCTURE REPLACEMENT ...................................................................................... 11 ALTERNATIVE 3: FULL BRIDGE REPLACEMENT ............................................................................................. 12 V. ALTERNATIVES SUMMARY ......................................................................................................... 14 VI. COST MATRIX ............................................................................................................................ 15 VII. CONCLUSION ............................................................................................................................. 16 VIII. APPENDICES .............................................................................................................................. 17 APPENDIX A: SITE PHOTOS ................................................................................................................ 18 APPENDIX B: TOWN MAP ................................................................................................................. 24 APPENDIX C: BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT .......................................................................................... 26 APPENDIX D: PRELIMINARY HYDRAULICS REPORT ................................................................................. 28 APPENDIX E: PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL REPORT ............................................................................. 30 APPENDIX F: RESOURCE ID COMPLETION MEMO ................................................................................. 38 APPENDIX G: NATURAL RESOURCES MEMO ......................................................................................... 41 APPENDIX H: ARCHEOLOGICAL MEMO ................................................................................................ 43 APPENDIX I: HISTORIC MEMO .......................................................................................................... 50 APPENDIX J: STORMWATER MEMO ................................................................................................... 93 APPENDIX K: COMMUNITY INPUT QUESTIONNAIRE ............................................................................... 95 APPENDIX L: OPERATIONS INPUT QUESTIONNAIRE ............................................................................... 99 APPENDIX M: CRASH DATA .............................................................................................................. 103 APPENDIX N: DETOUR ROUTES ........................................................................................................ 108 APPENDIX O: PLANS ....................................................................................................................... 111 I. Site Information Bridge 14 is a State-owned bridge located on VT Route 103 over Williams River and The Green Mountain Railroad in Chester. The Bridge is located approximately 0.7 miles north of the junction of VT Route 103 and VT Route 10. The bridge is located on a straight tangent with a curve at the southern approach. There is a rock cut located on the southern approach which restricts the width of the roadway. The existing conditions were gathered from a combination of a site visit, the Bridge Inspection Report, the Route Log and the existing survey. See correspondence in the Appendix for more detailed information. Roadway Classification Principal Arterial, National Highway System Bridge Type 4 Span Rolled Beam Bridge Bridge Length 361 feet Bridge Skew 60 degrees Year Built 1962 Ownership State of Vermont Need Bridge 14 carries VT Route 103 across Williams River and over the Green Mountain Railroad. The following is a list of deficiencies of Bridge 14 at this location: The deck is in poor condition. o There are extensive cracks, leaks, and areas of delaminations along with some spalling. There are localized areas of progressive distress with some concrete pop- outs exposing rusted rebar. o Wearing Surface: The bridge was paved in 2015, however, there are already signs of cracking, delaminations, and pending potholes in the wearing surface due to the poor condition of the deck underneath. o The fabric troughs at the joints have failed and have heavy leakage with heavy decay of the concrete end diaphragms. The superstructure is in satisfactory condition, with the following maintenance needs: o The beam ends have heavy rusting and corrosion due to years of leakage from the poor joint conditions. Some small holes are developing in the ends of the beam webs at the concrete end diaphragm interface over the piers. The substructures are in fair condition, with the following maintenance needs: o The pier caps/seats have heavy deterioration with cracking and delaminated concrete with many pop outs exposing corroded rebar. Some stirrups are rusted though. o The pier shafts and columns are in satisfactory condition with some minor to moderate distress. o The abutments have some minor cracks and stains. o The backwalls are deteriorating with some leakage getting through. Traffic A traffic study of this site was performed by the Vermont Agency of Transportation. The traffic volumes are projected for the years 2023 and 2043. Traffic Data 2023 2043 AADT 5,800 6,400 DHV 880 980 ADTT 690 1,100 %T 10.4 14.4 %D 53 53 Design Criteria The design standards for this bridge project are the Vermont State Standards, dated October 22, 1997. Minimum standards are based on an ADT of 6500, a DHV of 990, and a design speed of 50 mph for a Principal Arterial (NHS Route), VT Route 103 is considered a High Priority bicycle route at this area. Design Criteria Source Existing Condition Minimum Standard Comment Approach Lane and VSS Table 3.3 12’/9’ (42') 12'/8' (40') Shoulder Widths Bridge Lane and VSS Table 3.3 12’/3’ (30') 12'/10' (44') Substandard Shoulder Widths and Section 3.7 Clear Zone 24’fill / 14’cut (1:3 slope) VSS Table 3.5 No Issues Noted Distance
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Project Synopsis
    Intelligent Transportation Systems Applications To Ski Resorts in New England Dr. Adel W. Sadek, PI Randy J. Knapick, Co-PI Prepared for The New England Transportation Consortium March, 2004 NETCR46 Project No. 02-8 This report, prepared in cooperation with the New England Transportation Consortium, does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the views of the New England Transportation Consortium or the Federal Highway Administration. i TECHNICAL REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. 1. Report No. N/A N/A NETCR 46 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Intelligent Transportation Systems Applications to Ski Resorts in March, 2004 New England 6. Performing Organization Code N/A 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Adel W. Sadek and Randy J. Knapick NETCR 46 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10 Work Unit No. (TRAIS) University of Vermont N/A Burlington, VT 05405 11. Contract or Grant No. IBI Group N/A 3 Copley Place Boston, MA 02116 13. Type of Report and Period Covered 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address New England Transportation Consortium 179 Middle Turnpike Final University of Connecticut, U-5202 Storrs, CT 06269-5202 14. Sponsoring Agency Code NETC 02-8 A study conducted in cooperation with the U.S. DOT 15 Supplementary Notes N/A 16. Abstract Ski areas present transportation professionals with a host of challenging problems, including heavy seasonal peak traffic demands, the rural nature of the surrounding road networks, and the inclement weather conditions under which travel to ski resorts often occurs.
    [Show full text]
  • Chester-Andover Family Center Receives 1,000 Pounds of Pet Food
    Don’t Miss our Our Office will be PRSRT STD Advertising Give U.S. POSTAGE PAID POSTAL CUSTOMER Closed Deadline RESIDENTIAL CUSTOMER PERMIT #2 Thanks N. HAVERHILL, NH Nov. 26 and 27 Wed. Nov. 25 ECRWSSEDDMECRWSS FREE Your Local Community Newspaper THE Vermont NOVEMBER 18, 2020 | WWW.VERMONTJOURNAL.COM JournaVOLUME 20, ISSUEl 47 Ludlow American Legion Post Veterans Memorial Park 36 honors veterans maple tree removal LUDLOW, Vt. – The Ballard Ho- LUDLOW, Vt. – This majestic ma- bart American Legion Post 36 ple, a vibrant foliage showstop- held a Covid-conscious limited per in Veterans Memorial Park, celebration on Wednesday, Nov. was removed on Monday, Nov. 11 with a closing salute honoring 16, the victim of a rotting trunk. deceased veterans at Veterans The town decided to remove it be- Memorial Park in Ludlow. fore becoming a hazard but after it had one last glorious foliage PHOTO BY SHARON HUNTLEY season. According to Ludlow’s Municipal Manager Scott Mur- phy, the next steps are to have the tree stump ground out, fix the landscape, and let the winter settle the area before planting a new early-growth maple in the spring. The town is also remov- ing the maple tree in the park next to town offices, which will also be replaced in the spring. PHOTO BY SHARON HUNTLEY Chester-Andover Family Center Black River receives 1,000 pounds of pet food Good Neighbors CHESTER, Vt. – Since the on- raffle for Jabra food on the table to keep one’s set of the Covid-19 pandemic 75t active elite family nourished and healthy postpones their in March, the Chester-Andover earbuds at the is always a priority.
    [Show full text]
  • Killington Village Master Plan A250 Application
    STATE OF VERMONT SUPERIOR COURT ENVIRONMENTAL DIVISION Docket No. 147-10-13 Vtec147-10-13 Vtec Killington Village Master Plan A250 Application ENTRY REGARDING MOTION Title: Motion to Amend/Alter Permit Conditions (Motion 15) Filer: Rutland County Regional Planning Commission, Two Rivers-Ottauquechee Regional Commission, and the Southern Windsor Regional Planning Commission (hereinafter collectively referred to as the “Regional Commissions”). Attorney: Robert E. Woolmington Filed Date: July 1, 2016 Response filed on 07/14/2016 by Attorney Gregory J. Boulbol for Natural Resources Board Response filed on 07/15/2016 by Atty. Christopher D. Roy for Appellant SP Land Company, LLC Reply filed on 07/28/2016 by Attorney Robert E. Woolmington for the Regional Commissions (w/NRB joining). The motion is GRANTED. SP Land Company, LLC (“Applicant” or “SPLC”) seeks land use permits for a twenty-five lot subdivision and Phase I of its master plan at the Killington Ski Resort (“Resort”) in Killington, Vermont. On June 21, 2016, this Court issued its Merits Decision and Judgment Order affirming the District #1 Environmental Commission’s (“District Commissions”) approval of the land use permit, subject to conditions. Now before the Court is the Regional Commissions’ motion to alter and amend certain conditions of our decision and order related to Criterion 5—traffic. The Vermont Natural Resources Board (“NRB”) supports the pending motion. SPLC, while agreeing with parts of the Regional Commissions’ motion, requests a different result. For the reasons stated below, we GRANT the Regional Commissions’ motion and revise the challenged conditions. The focus of the motion to alter or amend is on Conditions 13 and 14 of the Court’s Merits Decision and Judgment Order.
    [Show full text]
  • Mount Holly Town Plan
    Mount Holly Town Plan Final Draft for Public Hearing February 10, 1999 COMMUNITY PROFILE 4 Town Goal 4 Adjacent Municipalities 4 Population and Employment 4 HISTORY 5 LOCATIONAL DATA 6 COMMUNITY RESOURCES 7 Recreation: Inventory 7 Star Lake 7 Lake Ninevah 8 Tiny Pond 8 Green Mountain National Forest 8 Okemo State Forest 8 Ball fields 9 Catamount Trail System 9 Private land 9 Recreation: Policy 9 Star Lake 9 Lake Ninevah 9 Tiny Pond 10 Green Mountain National Forest 10 Okemo State Forest 10 Ball fields 10 Private lands 10 Fire: Inventory 10 Fire: Policy 11 Police: Inventory 11 Police: Policy 11 Rescue Squad: Inventory 11 Rescue Squad: Policy - 12 Health Care Services: Inventory 12 Health Care Services: Policy 12 Cultural Facilities: Inventory 12 Library 12 Museum 13 Cultural Facilities: Policy 13 Town Library 13 Museum 13 Education: Inventory 13 Education: Policy 15 Town Administration: Inventory 15 Town Administration: Policy 16 Transportation: Inventory 16 Town highways 17 Bridges 18 Scenic roads 18 Transportation: Policy 18 Solid Waste: Inventory 19 Solid Waste: Policy 19 Sewage Disposal: Inventory 20 Sewage Disposal: Policy 20 Building Registrations: Inventory 20 Building Registrations: Policy 20 PHYSICAL FEATURES 21 Ground Water Resources: Inventory 21 Aquifer Recharge Areas 21 Well Heads and Water Systems 21 Ground Water Resources: Policy 21 Aquifer Recharge Areas 21 Well Heads and Water Systems 21 Surface Water Resources: Inventory 21 Wetlands 21 Flood plains 21 Shorelines 22 Lakes 22 Surface Water Resources: Policy 22 Wetlands 22
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Registration Form
    NFS Form 10-900 OMB No. 10024-0018 (Oct 1990) RECEIVED 2280 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service Q : * , : . J National Register of Historic Places Registration Form NAT REGISTER OF HISfORiC PLfl CES i NATIONAL PARK SERVICE This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking" x" in the appropriate box by entering the information requested. If an item does not apply to the property being documented, enter" N/A" for "not applicable.'' For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. 1. Name of Property historic name T.anr^l ftl gn Man.gnl Hall other names/site number Bowman,—Jnhn P., Es trite 2. Location Street & number on VT 103 1/2 mile SE of Cuttinsvilte not for publication city or town Shrewsbury NQ vicinity State Vermont code COUnty Rutland code zip code 3. State/Federal Aaencv Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended , 1 hereby certify that this Dl nomination D request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property ^Ea meets Q does not meet the National Register criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • Green Mountain National Forest Comprehensive Trail Strategy
    Green Mountain United States Department of National Forest Agriculture Forest Service Eastern Comprehensive Region July 2015 Trail Strategy Photo Courtesy of Dwight Geis Comprehensive Trail Strategy Team: Manchester Ranger District: William Jackson, District Ranger Roger Boyer, Acting District Ranger Carol Knight, District Recreation Program Manager Joan McCloud, Recreation Specialist (ret.) Danna Strout, Recreation Technician William Garrison, Recreation Technician Rochester/Middlebury Ranger Districts: Christopher Mattrick, District Ranger Holly Knox, District Recreation Program Manager Dundonald Cochrane, III, Recreation Technician Seth Coffey, Recreation Technician David Nulsen, Recreation Technician Kenneth Norden, Forestry Technician Supervisors Office: Donna Grosz, Public Services Staff Officer Melissa Reichert, Recreation Program Manager Carol Burd, Recreation Planner Patricia D’Andrea, Realty Specialist Thomas Tenyah, GIS Specialist _/s/ John A. Sinclair________________ ___7/27/15____ John A. Sinclair Date FOREST SUPERVISOR Green Mountain National Forest The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD).
    [Show full text]
  • The Vermont Journal 12-06-17
    Look ECRWSS Jack is PRSRT STD for him US Postage inside PAID Back! Permit #90 every White River Jct., VT week! @VermontJournal Pups of the Week on page 8B POSTAL CUSTOMER FREE DECEMBER 06, 2017 | WWW.VERMONTJOURNAL.COM VOLUME 17, ISSUE 49 Residents look to possible Black River independent school BY SHARON HUNTLEY committee in their mission since stu- ing to Donohue “the biggest hurdle gating implementing River Academy, the name The Vermont Journal dents from middle school and high will be getting approval with the state a 1 percent option the school was called be- school will have school choice, with since there seems to be resistance tax,” said Donohue. fore being made a public LUDLOW, Vt. - Ludlow and Mount their tuition dollars following the stu- within the Agency of Education to With an option We are Black River. school, though they are Holly residents voted “yes” on the pro- dent to their selected school, includ- accommodate schools beyond the tax, 1 percent addi- PHOTO BY SHAWNTAE STILLWELL still exploring the feasibil- posed unified school district vote on ing an independent school. public school model.” The application tional tax would be ity of this option. Nov. 28 with Ludlow voters tallying According to Uli Donohue, com- therefore must be a thorough and in- applied to rooms and meals within guidelines will be coming from the Donohue is pleased with the addi- 344 yes vs. 172 no votes and Mount mittee member of BRISC, “the fact depth proposal that will likely take the town and those dollars would go State Board of Education on special tional support and interest in BRISC Holly coming in with 341 yes vs.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Registration Form
    NATIONAL HISTORIC LANDMARK NOMINATION NPS Form 10-900 USDI/NPS NRHP Registration Form (Rev. 8-86) OMB No. 1024-0018 ROCKINGHAM MEETING HOUSE Page 1 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service__________________________________________National Register of Historic Places Registration Form 1. NAME OF PROPERTY Historic Name: ROCKINGHAM MEETING HOUSE Other Name/Site Number: Old North Meeting House 2. LOCATION Street & Number: Meeting House Road Not for publication: N/A City/Town: Rockingham Vicinity: N/A State: VT County: Windham Code: 025 Zip Code: 05101 3. CLASSIFICATION Ownership of Property Category of Property Private: _ Building(s): X_ Public-Local: X District: _ Public-State: _ Site: _ Public-Federal: Structure: _ Object:_ Number of Resources within Property Contributing Noncontributing _ buildings _ sites _ structures _ objects Total Number of Contributing Resources Previously Listed in the National Register: 1 Name of Related Multiple Property Listing: N/A NFS Form 10-900 USDI/NPS NRHP Registration Form (Rev. 8-86) OMB No. 1024-0018 ROCKINGHAM MEETING HOUSE Page 2 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service__________________________________________National Register of Historic Places Registration Form 4. STATE/FEDERAL AGENCY CERTIFICATION As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this __ nomination __ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property __ meets __ does not meet the National Register Criteria. Signature of Certifying Official Date State or Federal Agency and Bureau In my opinion, the property __ meets __ does not meet the National Register criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 State of Vermont Superior Court — Environmental
    STATE OF VERMONT SUPERIOR COURT — ENVIRONMENTAL DIVISION { Zaremba Group Act 250 Permit Appeal { Docket No. 36-3-13 Vtec { Decision on the Merits In the matter before us Shawn Cunningham, Michele Bargfrede, Cindy Farnsworth, Richard Farnsworth, Gail Gibbons, Robert Gibbons, Diane Holme, John Holme, Janice Housten, Leonard Lisai, Scott Morgan, Donald Payne, Stephanie Payne, Kathy Pellett, William Reed, Kathy Schoendorf, Claudio Veliz, Bonnie Watters, and Lew Watters (Appellants) appeal a February 27, 2013 decision by the District #2 Environmental Commission granting an Act 250 Land Use Permit amendment to Zaremba Program Development, LLC, f/k/a Zaremba Group, LLC and Theodore Zachary (Applicants or Zaremba). This permit amendment allows Applicants to create two lots consisting of Lot 1 with 8.72 acres and an existing, permitted 3,000- square foot restaurant; and Lot 2 with 1.37 acres and the construction and operation of a proposed 9,100 square-foot retail store (the Project) all to be located at 319 South Main Street (Route 103) in the Town of Chester, Vermont (the Town). The Court conducted a site visit at the subject property and surrounding area on the morning of September 10, 2013 followed by a three-day merits hearing at the Vermont Superior Court, Civil Division, Newfane Unit in Newfane, Vermont. 1 Appearing at the site visit and merits hearing were Attorneys Alan P. Biederman and David R. Cooper, representing the Applicants, and Attorney James Allan Dumont, representing the Appellants. Attorney Jon Groveman, representing the Agency of Natural Resources (ANR) attended and participated in the trial. Attorney Peter Gill, representing the Natural Resources Board, attended the trial but did not actively participate.
    [Show full text]
  • Rockingham, Bellows Falls Hires New Town Manager Scott Pickup
    PRSRT STD U.S. POSTAGE 59 PAID POSTAL CUSTOMER FREE Years RESIDENTIAL CUSTOMER PERMIT #2 N. HAVERHILL, NH ECRWSSEDDMECRWSS Ask us about our Holiday Ad Bundle! Your Local Community Newspaper NOVEMBER 04, 2020 | WWW.VERMONTJOURNAL.COM VOLUME 59, ISSUE 23 Rockingham, Bellows Falls hires new town manager Scott Pickup BY JOE MILLIKEN for six years, the commissioner and decided to apply.” wear many hats and pitch in to A few of Pickup’s top pri- The Shopper of public works for the city of After the town’s previous get the job done, and I really orities will include the Police New Rochelle, N.Y., and be- manager, Wendy Harrison, re- felt the spirit during my inter- Department’s union nego- BELLOWS FALLS, Vt. – Af- fore that was the city manager signed in May, the search for view process here. I am very tiations, the village and town ter a thorough search, the town in Rye, N.Y. and Germantown, the successor came down to happy that I was selected and budgets, the continued ef- of Rockingham and village of Ohio. Being from out-of-state, Pickup and one other candi- my appreciation for the dedi- forts to revitalize the Bellows Bellows Falls recently hired a how did his interest in this date. Pickup was selected and cation and effectiveness of the Falls Opera House and local new manager. In a recent joint position and Vermont come considered the best candidate current staff has only increased businesses. Municipal manager, Scott Pickup. meeting between the Rock- about? for the position because of his as I have settled into the job.
    [Show full text]
  • BEDROCK GEOLOGIC MAP of the SAXTONS RIVER 7.5'Xl5' QUADRANGLE, WINDHAM and WINDSOR COUNTIES, VERMONT INTRODUCTION
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR TO ACCOMPANY MAP I-2636 U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BEDROCK GEOLOGIC MAP OF THE SAXTONS RIVER 7.5'xl5' QUADRANGLE, WINDHAM AND WINDSOR COUNTIES, VERMONT By Nicholas M. Ratcliffe and Thomas R. Armstrong INTRODUCTION its northern and southern closures and was interpreted as the upwardly folded and inverted part of the recumbent syncline that Bedrock of the Saxtons River 7.5'x15' minute quadrangle was complimentary to the anticlinal nappe. Likewise, a major ranges in age from Middle Proterozoic to Cretaceous. All of the belt of metavolcanic rocks in the Devonian metasedimentary rocks, except for the late granitic and mafic dikes, are weakly to rocks east of the domes (Standing Pond Volcanic Member of the very strongly deformed, high-grade metamorphic rocks, such as Waits River Formation) was interpreted as a major, originally east schists and gneisses. The major geologic feature is the domal verging, synclinal nappe. We do not agree with these exposure of Middle Proterozoic gneiss and granite that makes up interpretations, and regard the structures as typical anticlinal and the core of the Chester and Athens domes in the eastern one synclinal folds. third of the map. The narrowed connection, a structural saddle between the domes, forms the juncture between the generally south-plunging end of the Chester dome to the north and the PREVIOUS STUDIES AND PRESENT EVALUATION north-plunging Athens dome to the south. From west of the The Saxtons River 7 .5'x15' quadrangle covers the northern domes to the border of the quadrangle is a broad belt of half of the former Saxtons River 15-minute quadrangle that was structurally very complex cover rocks that range in age from Late studied by Rosenfeld (1954).
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation)
    Southern Windsor County Regional Planning Commission 2014 Regional Plan Volume 2 of 2 (Transportation) Adopted – November 18, 2014 Effective – December 23, 2014 Southern Windsor County Regional Planning Commission P.O. Box 320 Ascutney Professional Building Ascutney, VT 05030 802-674-9201 www.swcrpc.org Acknowledgements The Southern Windsor County Regional Planning Commission (SWCRPC) wishes to thank all the individuals who contributed their time and expertise to the revision of Volume 2 of the Southern Windsor County Regional Plan (also known as the Regional Transportation Plan), especially the members of the Transportation Advisory Committee (both past and present members). Southern Windsor County Regional Planning Commission Commissioners Peter Daniels, Chairman, Weathersfield Thomas Bock, Vice Chairman, Chester Carol Lighthall, Secretary/Treasurer, Baltimore Joseph Fromberger, Andover Etienne Ting, Cavendish Norman Vanasse, Ludlow John Mitchell, Reading Donald Barrett, Springfield Hal Pyke, West Windsor Clayton Paronto, Windsor Bob Flint, Springfield Regional Development Center (SRDC), At-large Southern Windsor County Transportation Advisory Committee (TAC) Kristi Morris, Chairman, Springfield Tom Kenyon, Vice Chairman, West Windsor Shep Thomas, Baltimore John Saydek, Cavendish Sharon Bixby, Ludlow Gordy Eastman, Reading Jeffrey Slade, Weathersfield Jackie Cassino, VTrans, Ex-officio Jeff Taft-Dick, Bicycle and Pedestrian, At-large Staff Thomas Kennedy, AICP, Executive Director Jason Rasmussen, AICP, Senior Planner Katharine Otto, AICP, Planner John Broker-Campbell, CFM, Regional Planner Dan Potter, Planner Cynthia Porter, Financial Administrator Chris Titus, Administrative Assistant Funding This report was funded in part through grant[s] from the Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation. The views and opinions of the SWCRPC expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the U.S.
    [Show full text]