DOCSLIB.ORG

APPENDIX 1-2 Flora and Fauna Survey

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
APPENDIX 1-2 Flora and Fauna Survey APPENDIX 1-2 Flora and Fauna Survey Yangibana Rare Earths Project Flora and Fauna Survey Prepared for Hastings Technology Metals Limited 8 June 2017 Yangibana Rare Earths Project Flora and Fauna Survey DOCUMENT TRACKING Item Detail Project Name Yangibana Rare Earths Project Flora and Fauna Survey Project Number 6786 Sarah Dalgleish Project Manager Suite 1 & 2, 49 Ord Street, West Perth WA 6005 (08) 9227 1070 Prepared by Jeni Morris, Sarah Dalgleish Reviewed by Joel Collins Approved by Joel Collins Status FINAL Version Number 2 Last saved on 8 June 2017 Cover photo Rocky granite ridgetop © Eco Logical Australia 2017 This report should be cited as ‘Eco Logical Australia 2017. Yangibana Rare Earths Project Flora and Fauna Survey. Prepared for Hastings Technology Metals Limited.’ ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This document has been prepared by Eco Logical Australia Pty Ltd with support from Hastings Technology Metals Limited. Disclaimer This document may only be used for the purpose for which it was commissioned and in accordance with the contract between Eco Logical Australia Pty Ltd and Hastings Technology Metals Limited. The scope of services was defined in consultation with Hastings Technology Metals Limited, by time and budgetary constraints imposed by the client, and the availability of reports and other data on the subject area. Changes to available information, legislation and schedules are made on an ongoing basis and readers should obtain up to date information. Eco Logical Australia Pty Ltd accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for or in respect of any use of or reliance upon this report and its supporting material by any third party. Information provided is not intended to be a substitute for site specific assessment or legal advice in relation to any matter. Unauthorised use of this report in any form is prohibited. Template 29/9/2015 © ECO LOGICAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD ii Yangibana Rare Earths Project Flora and Fauna Survey Contents Executive summary ............................................................................................................................... vii 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Project background ....................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Legislative framework ................................................................................................................... 1 2 Desktop assessment .................................................................................................................. 3 2.1 Study area .................................................................................................................................... 3 2.2 Climate .......................................................................................................................................... 3 2.3 Regional context ........................................................................................................................... 3 2.3.1 Broad scale vegetation mapping .................................................................................................. 3 2.4 Database searches and literature review ..................................................................................... 6 2.4.1 Previous surveys .......................................................................................................................... 6 2.5 Likelihood of occurrence assessment ........................................................................................ 13 2.5.1 Conservation significant species ................................................................................................ 13 2.5.2 Conservation significant areas and Environmentally Sensitive Areas ....................................... 13 3 Survey Methodology ................................................................................................................ 16 3.1 Survey team, timing and effort .................................................................................................... 16 3.2 Survey limitations ....................................................................................................................... 16 3.3 Flora and vegetation survey ....................................................................................................... 17 3.3.1 Targeted survey .......................................................................................................................... 18 3.3.2 Specimen identification and nomenclature ................................................................................. 18 3.4 Fauna .......................................................................................................................................... 19 3.4.1 Conservation significant fauna and fauna habitat ...................................................................... 19 3.4.2 Taxonomy and nomenclature ..................................................................................................... 19 4 Results ....................................................................................................................................... 21 4.1 Flora of the study area ................................................................................................................ 21 4.1.1 Conservation significant flora ..................................................................................................... 21 4.1.2 Flora likelihood of occurrence..................................................................................................... 22 4.1.3 New (undescribed) species ........................................................................................................ 22 4.2 Vegetation of the study area ....................................................................................................... 24 4.2.1 Vegetation types ......................................................................................................................... 24 4.2.2 Conservation significant ecological communities ....................................................................... 24 4.2.3 Vegetation condition ................................................................................................................... 34 4.3 Fauna .......................................................................................................................................... 36 4.3.1 Conservation significant fauna ................................................................................................... 36 © ECO LOGICAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD iii Yangibana Rare Earths Project Flora and Fauna Survey 4.3.2 Fauna habitats ............................................................................................................................ 36 4.3.3 Fauna likelihood of occurrence................................................................................................... 37 5 Discussion................................................................................................................................. 44 5.1 Flora and vegetation ................................................................................................................... 44 5.2 Fauna .......................................................................................................................................... 45 References ............................................................................................................................................. 46 Appendix A Framework for conservation significant flora and fauna rankings ............................. 48 Appendix B PMST database search results ....................................................................................... 56 Appendix C NatureMap database search results............................................................................... 65 Appendix D Flora likelihood of occurrence assessment .................................................................. 68 Appendix E Fauna likelihood of occurrence assessment ................................................................ 70 Appendix F Flora species list............................................................................................................... 73 Appendix G Floristic relevé data ......................................................................................................... 77 Appendix H Species matrix by vegetation type ............................................................................... 129 List of figures Figure 2-1: Study area location .................................................................................................................. 5 Figure 2-2: Previous surveys in the vicinity of the study area .................................................................. 12 Figure 2-3: Conservation significant flora species previously recorded within the vicinity of the study area .................................................................................................................................................................. 14 Figure 2-4: Conservation significant fauna species previously recorded within the vicinity of the study area .................................................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Background Detailed Flora and Vegetation Assessment
    Our ref: EEN18041.003 Level 2, 27-31 Troode Street West Perth WA 6005 T +61 8 9211 1111 Date: 04 June 2019 Tanya McColgan Bellevue Gold Limited Suite 3, Level 3, 24 Outram Street WEST PERTH WA 6008 Dear Tanya, Flora and vegetation values identified within PoW 79431 In response to your request for the preliminary results of the detailed flora and vegetation assessment undertaken over the Bellevue Gold Project area, RPS Australia West Pty Ltd (RPS) herein provides a summary of the key results and outcomes of the assessment in lieu of the final report which is due in July. Background Bellevue Gold Ltd (Bellevue Gold) is currently undertaking an exploration drilling program within mining tenement M3625 for the Bellevue Gold Project (the Project). The Project is located in the north-eastern Goldfields; approximately 40 km north of the township of Leinster in the Shire of Leonora. The Project is situated on and surrounded by pastoral lands and is located on Yakabindie cattle station. RPS was commissioned by Bellevue Gold to undertake a detailed flora and vegetation assessment over M3625 and part of M3624 to encompass the area where exploration drilling is currently underway and including the potential mining and associated infrastructure footprint (the proposed development area). The survey area, the proposed development area and the PoW 79431 area are shown in Figure A. RPS understands that the Department of Mines, Industry Regulation and Safety (DMIRS) and the Department of Biodiversity Conservation and Attractions (DBCA) have requested additional information regarding the natural values of the PoW area, where in-fill drilling is proposed, in order to adequately assess the PoW application.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Attachments-Yaringa Quarry
    List of Attachments-Yaringa Quarry The following are a list of attachments associated with the Yaringa Works Approval – Attachment 1-Yaringa Quarry Vertices co-ordinates – Attachment 2-Yaringa Quarry Proposed Premises Map – Attachment 3A-Yaringa Quarry Estimated road building production program – Attachment 3B-Yaringa Clearing Area – Attachment 3-Key Plant and Equipment Nov 2016 – Attachment 3-Process Flowchart – Attachment 3-Proposed layout of machinery on site (approximate may change depending on site requirements and conditions) – Attachment 3-Yaringa Stockpile Layout Plan – Attachment 7-Nearest sensitive receiver from project area – Attachment 7-Siting and location Yaringa Quarry – Attachment 7-Yaringa Quarry Proximity to Hamelin Pool and Shark Bay – Attachment 10-Fee Calculator Outputs – Attachment 11-Yaringa Quarry PEIA and EMP – Biological Survey Page 1 of 1 Vertices Longitude Latitude 0 114.31174 -25.9992 1 114.31171 -25.9996 2 114.30988 -25.9995 3 114.30854 -25.9994 4 114.30905 -25.9983 5 114.31068 -26.0005 6 114.31068 -26.0025 7 114.30816 -26.0024 8 114.30814 -26.0002 9 114.30866 -26.0016 10 114.30932 -26.0016 11 114.3093 -26.002 12 114.30869 -26.0019 13 114.31456 -25.9999 14 114.31539 -26.0008 15 114.31516 -26.0009 16 114.31469 -26.0006 17 114.3144 -26.0003 18 114.31409 -26.0001 19 114.31384 -26.0011 20 114.31349 -26.0011 21 114.31216 -25.9998 22 114.31432 -25.9987 23 114.31541 -25.9983 24 114.31723 -25.9988 25 114.31651 -26.0004 26 114.30813 -26.0002 27 114.31724 -26.0007 28 114.31656 -26.0008 29 114.31579 -26.0012 30 114.31539
    [Show full text]
  • DRAFT 25/10/90; Plant List Updated Oct. 1992; Notes Added June 2021
    DRAFT 25/10/90; plant list updated Oct. 1992; notes added June 2021. PRELIMINARY REPORT ON THE CONSERVATION VALUES OF OPEN COUNTRY PADDOCK, BOOLARDY STATION Allan H. Burbidge and J.K. Rolfe INTRODUCTION Boolardy Station is situated about 150 km north of Yalgoo and 140 km west-north-west of Cue, in the Shire of Murchison, Western Australia. Open Country Paddock (about 16 000 ha) is in the south-east corner of the station, at 27o05'S, 116o50'E. The most prominent named feature is Coolamooka Hill, near the eastern boundary of the paddock. There are no conservation reserves in this region, although there are some small reserves set aside for various other purposes. Previous biological data for the station consist of broad scale vegetation mapping and land system mapping. Beard (1976) mapped the entire Murchison region at 1: 1 000 000. The Open Country Paddock area was mapped as supporting mulga woodlands and shrublands. More detailed mapping of land system units for rangeland assessment purposes has been carried out more recently at a scale of 1: 40 000 (Payne and Curry in prep.). Seven land systems were identified in open Country Paddock (Fig. 1). Apart from these studies, no detailed biological survey work appears to have been done in the area. Open Country Paddock has been only lightly grazed by domestic stock because of the presence of Kite-leaf Poison (Gastrolobium laytonii) and a lack of fresh water. Because of this and the generally good condition of the paddock and presence of a wide range of plant species, P.J.
    [Show full text]
  • Legumes of Wallace Desert Gardens
    Bulletin of The Desert Legume Program of The Boyce Thompson Southwestern Arboretum and The University of Arizona Volume 18, Number 2 August 2006 Legumes of Wallace Desert Gardens Pamela Slate standing relationship between our Desert Gardens reviews and Botanic Coordinator organizations, one I see growing ever approves appropriate on-site Wallace Desert Gardens stronger year after year.” projects of mutual benefit. Wallace Desert Gardens is a Matthew B. Johnson non-profit foundation [(502(c)(3) In the mid-1980’s, the Program Manager and Curator under IRS rules] that was created in Wallace’s moved, complete with their Desert Legume Program 1993, well after much of the garden plant collection, from a Paradise was established. Its mission was Valley acre to a Scottsdale The virtues of desert legumes written by HB, as he was fondly subdivision where they purchased captured the attention of H.B. and known, to reflect the original intent of numerous acre-plus lots. At the time, Jocelyn M. Wallace when they first the foundation: HB had “no idea it would be bigger learned of the Desert Legume than a two-acre garden.” Although Program (DELEP) in 1989, about a Wallace Desert Gardens is a he “knew nothing of desert plants year after the program was founded collection of the world’s deserts when he moved to Arizona” in the at the University of Arizona. They plants located at an elevation of early 1980’s, they quickly became his understood the importance of some 2400 feet. Founded by passion. Today the garden legumes’ potential applications H.B.
    [Show full text]
  • Vegetation Type 6 - Mulga on Rocky Or Stony Slopes of Quartzite, Sandstone Or Silcrete
    Vegetation Type 6 - Mulga on rocky or stony slopes of quartzite, sandstone or silcrete KEY # - Occurrence in vegetation type requires confirmation For more information visit N - Not charateristic in that vegetation community wildlife.lowecol.com.au F - Few plants occur /resources/vegetation-maps/ S - Some plants will occur M - Most likely to occur in the vegetation community Data courtesty of Albrecht, D., Pitts, B. (2004). The Vegetation and Plant Species of the Alice Springs Municipality Northern Territory. Department of Infrastructure, Planning and Environment & Greening Australia NT, Report 0724548580, Alice Springs, NT. Taxon Name Common Name FreqCode Form Comments Abutilon fraseri Dwarf Lantern-bush S Herb Abutilon leucopetalum Desert Lantern-bush F Herb Abutilon macrum Slender Lantern-bush F Herb Acacia aneura s.lat. Mulga, Broad-leaved Mulga M Tree Acacia bivenosa Hill Umbrella Bush N Shrub Acacia estrophiolata Ironwood, Southern Ironwood N Tree Acacia kempeana Witchetty Bush S Shrub Acacia melleodora Waxy Wattle N Shrub Acacia murrayana Colony Wattle, Murrays Wattle N Shrub Acacia paraneura Weeping Mulga F Tree Acacia sessiliceps Curly-pod Wattle N Tree Acacia tetragonophylla Dead Finish, Kurara S Shrub Amaranthus centralis Central Amaranth F # Herb Amaranthus interruptus Native Amaranth F # Herb Amyema hilliana Ironwood Mistletoe N Mistletoe Amyema maidenii subsp. maidenii Pale-leaf Mistletoe S Mistletoe Amyema preissii Wire-leaf Mistletoe N Mistletoe Aristida arida Aristida, Three-awn, Wiregrass N Grass Bunched Kerosene Grass, Mulga Grass, Bunched Windgrass, Wind Aristida contorta S Grass Grass Aristida holathera var. holathera Erect Kerosene Grass, White Grass, Arrow Grass F Grass Curly Wiregrass, Fire Grass, Unequal Three-awn, Feathertop Aristida inaequiglumis F Grass Only on gentle colluvial slopes Threeawn Aristida jerichoensis var.
    [Show full text]
  • Botanical Survey of Central Pilbara Uplands
    BOTANICAL SURVEY OF CENTRAL PILBARA UPLANDS Project (N709) Final Report - Third Year 1997 Prepared by: Stephen van Leeuwen Date: February 1998 Research and the collation of information presented in this report was undertaken with funding provided by the Biodiversity Group of Environment Australia. The project was undertaken for the National Reserves System program (Project N709). The views and opinions expressed in this report are those of the author and do not reflect those of the Commonwealth Government, the Minister for the Environment, Sport and Territories, or the Director of National parks and Wildlife. Copies of this report may be borrowed from the library: Biodiversity Group Environment Australia GPO Box 636 CANBERRA ACT 2601 AUSTRALIA or Dr Stephen van Leeuwen Science and Information Division CALM Karratha PO Box 835 KARRATHA WA 6714 AUSTRALIA PRECIS BOTANICAL SURVEY OF CENTRAL PILBARA UPLANDS Proiect N706 A total of 745 uplands greater than 1 000 m elevation have been identified in the Central Pilbara. These uplands are principally located throughout the central and eastern portions of the Hamersley Range. Thirty seven of these uplands were selected as primary sites for detail botanical investigation. To ensure a representative sampling of the biophysical gradients present across the project area an additional 16 upland sites were included in the project design. These supplementary sites were less than 1 000 m elevation and were located towards the margins of the Hamersley Range. Since the commencement of this project in 1995, 22 of the selected uplands have been surveyed. Permanent benchmark quadrats have been established on each upland visited and the flora within quadrats systematically recorded.
    [Show full text]
  • Geraldton Mt Magnet Road SLK 222.45 Biological Survey May 2012
    Main Roads Western Australia Report for Material Source Area: Geraldton Mt Magnet Road SLK 222.45 Biological Survey May 2012 This Report: has been prepared by GHD for Main Roads Western Australia (MRWA) and may only be used and relied on by MRWA for the purpose agreed between GHD and MRWA as set out in section 1.3 of this Report. GHD otherwise disclaims responsibility to any person other than MRWA arising in connection with this Report. GHD also excludes implied warranties and conditions, to the extent legally permissible. The services undertaken by GHD in connection with preparing this Report were limited to those specifically detailed in the Report and are subject to the scope limitations set out in the Report. The opinions, conclusions and any recommendations in this Report are based on conditions encountered and information reviewed at the date of preparation of the Report. GHD has no responsibility or obligation to update this Report to account for events or changes occurring subsequent to the date that the Report was prepared. The opinions, conclusions and any recommendations in this Report are based on assumptions made by GHD described in this Report. GHD disclaims liability arising from any of the assumptions being incorrect. GHD has prepared this Report on the basis of information provided by MRWA and others who provided information to GHD (including Government authorities), which GHD has not independently verified or checked beyond the agreed scope of work. GHD does not accept liability in connection with such unverified information, including errors and omissions in the Report which were caused by errors or omissions in that information.” The opinions, conclusions and any recommendations in this Report are based on information obtained from, and testing undertaken at or in connection with, specific sample points.
    [Show full text]
  • 29 April 2020 Santos Reference: CB20-05 Ms Dominique Taylor
    29 April 2020 Santos Reference: CB20-05 Ms Dominique Taylor Team Leader, Energy, Extractive and South West QLD Compliance (Assessment) Department of Environment and Science Level 7, 400 George Street BRISBANE QLD 4000 Dear Dominique, Application to Amend Environmental Authority EPPG00407213 (Petroleum Lease (PL) 80) Santos Ltd (Santos) on behalf of its joint venture partners has prepared the attached application to amend Environmental Authority (EA) EPPG00407213. The application has been prepared in accordance with Sections 226 and 227 of the Environmental Protection Act 1994 (EP Act). This application seeks a change to the scale and intensity for the activities authorised by the EA through the amendment of conditions A1 - A3. The following information is attached in support of the amendment application: • Attachment 1 – EA Amendment Application Form • Attachment 2 – Supporting Information The amendment application has been prepared as a major amendment. The application fee of $334.90 has been paid upon lodgement of the application. Please contact me on 3838 5696 or [email protected] should you have any questions in relation to the application. Yours sincerely, Elizabeth Dunlop Santos Limited Attachment 1 – EA Amendment Application Form Attachment 2 – Supporting Information Attachment 2 – Supporting Information for an Environmental Authority (EA) Amendment Application Petroleum Lease (PL) 80 EA EPPG00407213 Table of Contents: 1. Introduction ..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Report
    A STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK FOR BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Report B: For practitioners of conservation planning Copyright text 2012 Southwest Australia Ecoregion Initiative. All rights reserved. Author: Danielle Witham, WWF-Australia First published: 2012 by the Southwest Australia Ecoregion Initiative. Any reproduction in full or in part of this publication must mention the title and credit the above-mentioned publisher as the copyright Cover Image: ©Richard McLellan Design: Three Blocks Left Design Printed by: SOS Print & Media Printed on Impact, a 100% post-consumer waste recycled paper. For copies of this document, please contact SWAEI Secretariat, PO Box 4010, Wembley, Western Australia 6913. This document is also available from the SWAEI website at http://www.swaecoregion.org SETTING THE CONTEXT i CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 2 SETTING THE CONTEXT 3 The Southwest Australia Ecoregion Initiative SUMMARY OF THE PROJECT METHODOLOGY 5 STEP 1. IDENTIFYING RELEVANT STAKEHOLDERS AND CLARIFYING ROLES 7 Expert engagement STEP 2. DEFINING PROJECT BOUNDARY 9 The boundary of the Southwest Australia Ecoregion STEP 3. APPLYING PLANNING UNITS TO PROJECT AREA 11 STEP 4. PREPARING AND CHOOSING SOFTWARE 13 Data identification 13 Conservation planning software 14 STEP 5. IDENTIFYING CONSERVATION FEATURES 16 Choosing conservation features 16 Fauna conservation features 17 Flora conservation features 21 Inland water body conservation features 22 Inland water species conservation features 27 Other conservation features 27 Threatened and Priority Ecological communities (TECs and PECs) 31 Vegetation conservation features 32 Vegetation connectivity 36 STEP 6. APPLYING CONSERVATION FEATURES TO PLANNING UNITS 38 STEP 7. SETTING TARGETS 40 Target formulae 40 Special formulae 42 STEP 8. IDENTIFYING AND DEFINING LOCK-INS 45 STEP 9.
    [Show full text]
  • Cytological Studies in Cyperaceae with Special Reference to Its Taxonomy Ll
    Cvtologia 43: 643-653, 1978 Cytological Studies in Cyperaceae with Special Reference to its Taxonomy ll S. P. Rath and S. N. Patnaik CytogeneticsLaboratory, P. G. Departmentof Botany,Utkal University, Bhubaneswar,India. 751004 ReceivedApril 25, 1977 During the recent years a few workers have reported chromosome numbers of various members of the family Cyperaceae from different regions of India. Notable among them are Sanyal (1972), Sanyal and Sharma (1972). Rath and Patnaik (1974a and 1974b), Nijalingappa (1975) and Mehra and Sachdev (1975). A survey of all these reports reveals that not only most of the genera are characterised by series of aneuploid numbers but there is great disparity in the findings of different workers in respect of chromosome numbers for the same species. Moreover certain genera have not been cytologically worked out. This necessitates further study in the family in a more broad based plan. As a continuation of our previous report (Rath and Patnaik 1974a) of chromo some numbers in 24 species of the family, meiotic studies of another 45 species are presented here in the light of which certain taxonomic problems are discussed. Materials and methods Plants were collected from various parts of the State of Orissa and fixings col lected in the field were generally worked out immediately as even 2-3 days of storing in the usual procedure of fixing in acetic-alcohol (1:3) and transfering to 70% ethyl alcohol induce excessive staining of the cytoplasm. Addition of chloro form to acetic acid and ethyl alcohol mixture though proved slightly better it did not very much improve the staining quality.
    [Show full text]
  • Sites of Botanical Significance Vol1 Part1
    Plant Species and Sites of Botanical Significance in the Southern Bioregions of the Northern Territory Volume 1: Significant Vascular Plants Part 1: Species of Significance Prepared By Matthew White, David Albrecht, Angus Duguid, Peter Latz & Mary Hamilton for the Arid Lands Environment Centre Plant Species and Sites of Botanical Significance in the Southern Bioregions of the Northern Territory Volume 1: Significant Vascular Plants Part 1: Species of Significance Matthew White 1 David Albrecht 2 Angus Duguid 2 Peter Latz 3 Mary Hamilton4 1. Consultant to the Arid Lands Environment Centre 2. Parks & Wildlife Commission of the Northern Territory 3. Parks & Wildlife Commission of the Northern Territory (retired) 4. Independent Contractor Arid Lands Environment Centre P.O. Box 2796, Alice Springs 0871 Ph: (08) 89522497; Fax (08) 89532988 December, 2000 ISBN 0 7245 27842 This report resulted from two projects: “Rare, restricted and threatened plants of the arid lands (D95/596)”; and “Identification of off-park waterholes and rare plants of central Australia (D95/597)”. These projects were carried out with the assistance of funds made available by the Commonwealth of Australia under the National Estate Grants Program. This volume should be cited as: White,M., Albrecht,D., Duguid,A., Latz,P., and Hamilton,M. (2000). Plant species and sites of botanical significance in the southern bioregions of the Northern Territory; volume 1: significant vascular plants. A report to the Australian Heritage Commission from the Arid Lands Environment Centre. Alice Springs, Northern Territory of Australia. Front cover photograph: Eremophila A90760 Arookara Range, by David Albrecht. Forward from the Convenor of the Arid Lands Environment Centre The Arid Lands Environment Centre is pleased to present this report on the current understanding of the status of rare and threatened plants in the southern NT, and a description of sites significant to their conservation, including waterholes.
    [Show full text]
  • Cane River Conservation Park, Western Australia 2011, a Bush
    BUSH BLITZ SPECIES DISCOVERY PROGRAM Cane River Conservation Park WA 20 June–1 July 2011 What is Contents Bush Blitz? Bush Blitz is a Summary 3 multi-million dollar Abbreviations 3 partnership between the Introduction 5 Australian Government, Reserve Overview 6 BHP Billiton and Earthwatch Methods 8 Australia to document plants Results 11 and animals in selected properties across Australia’s Discussion 14 National Reserve System. Appendix A: Species Lists 33 Fauna 34 Vertebrates 34 This innovative partnership Invertebrates 42 harnesses the expertise of many Flora 50 of Australia’s top scientists from Appendix B: Threatened Species 57 museums, herbaria, universities, Fauna 58 and other institutions and Vertebrates 58 Flora 60 organisations across the country. Appendix C: Exotic and Pest Species 61 Fauna 62 Vertebrates 62 Invertebrates 63 Flora 64 Glossary 65 2 Bush Blitz survey report Summary A two-week Bush Blitz was conducted in Cane River Conservation Park in the Pilbara region of Western Australia in June 2011. A total of Abbreviations 645 species were identified, 346 of which had not been recorded previously in the park. Added to earlier records, 840 fauna and flora species have EPBC Act now been identified in the park. Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Commonwealth) In this study, 61 putative species new to science were found. These were all invertebrates and NRS consisted of 32 stygofauna (animals that live National Reserve System entirely aquatic lives within groundwater systems), 28 terrestrial invertebrates and 1 water beetle. Some insect species, notably The park also has a rich vertebrate fauna. Reptiles bees and moths, were under-represented in are particularly abundant: 45 species were identified the specimen collection, probably due to the in the survey, and a total of 80 species have been season of collection.
    [Show full text]