Cytological Studies in Cyperaceae with Special Reference to Its Taxonomy Ll

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Cytological Studies in Cyperaceae with Special Reference to Its Taxonomy Ll Cvtologia 43: 643-653, 1978 Cytological Studies in Cyperaceae with Special Reference to its Taxonomy ll S. P. Rath and S. N. Patnaik CytogeneticsLaboratory, P. G. Departmentof Botany,Utkal University, Bhubaneswar,India. 751004 ReceivedApril 25, 1977 During the recent years a few workers have reported chromosome numbers of various members of the family Cyperaceae from different regions of India. Notable among them are Sanyal (1972), Sanyal and Sharma (1972). Rath and Patnaik (1974a and 1974b), Nijalingappa (1975) and Mehra and Sachdev (1975). A survey of all these reports reveals that not only most of the genera are characterised by series of aneuploid numbers but there is great disparity in the findings of different workers in respect of chromosome numbers for the same species. Moreover certain genera have not been cytologically worked out. This necessitates further study in the family in a more broad based plan. As a continuation of our previous report (Rath and Patnaik 1974a) of chromo some numbers in 24 species of the family, meiotic studies of another 45 species are presented here in the light of which certain taxonomic problems are discussed. Materials and methods Plants were collected from various parts of the State of Orissa and fixings col lected in the field were generally worked out immediately as even 2-3 days of storing in the usual procedure of fixing in acetic-alcohol (1:3) and transfering to 70% ethyl alcohol induce excessive staining of the cytoplasm. Addition of chloro form to acetic acid and ethyl alcohol mixture though proved slightly better it did not very much improve the staining quality. Suitable cells from freshly prepared slides were immediately photographed as very often the cells become darkened in the process of making the slides permanent. All the negatives of the photomicrographs and the voucher specimens from which the fixings were collected are preserved in the P. G. Department of Botany, Utkal University. Results and discussion Meiotic and pollen mitotic analysis of 45 species belonging to 12 genera could be done during the present investigation. These findings along with the previous reports are recorded in Table 1. Of these, chromosome numbers of 14 species (*) are reported here for the first time and discrepant chromosome numbers are recorded for 14 species (**). Larger number of species were, however, studied from Cyperus and Fimbristylis and only one species from each of the genera 644 S. P. Rath and S. N. Patnaik Cytologia 43 Bulbostylis, Courtoisia, Lipocarpha and Rhynchospora. Chromosome numbers of 14 species of Cyperus recorded here are found to be in the same aneuploid series as recorded earlier by various workers. Range of chromosome numbers was found to be from n=13 in C. haspan to n=76 in C. rotundus with various intermediate numbers. Cyperus cephalotes, a very distinct species within the genus and kept separate in a single subgenus Anosporum (Clarke in Hooker 1893) was found to be charac terised by n=21 (Fig. 1). C. platystylis, which grows sympatrically with C. cephalotes as the tank floater but morphologically very distinct from it, was found to possess the haploid chromosome number of n=20. Another species C. castaneus though grouped with C. platystylis under the same subsgenus it is a much smaller plant and grows in completely different habitat. This plant was found to possess higher chromosome number of n=49. Cyperus tenuispica, C. pulcherrimus, C. haspan and C. difformis are grouped under the same section of the subgenus Pycnostachys (Clarke in Hooker l.c.). Of these while C. difformis is distinguished out by its capitate spike and very small spikelets, the other three species forms a complex group. Though in the nature of the spikelet they are closely allied, C. tenuispica is differentiated by the large sized plants. Cytologically this species is also distinct from other two in possessing the haploid chromosome number of n=8 (Rath and Patnaik 1974a) which is the lowest chromosome number yet reported for the genus. Cyperus haspan and C. pulcher rimus were both found to be characterised by n=13 (Fig. 4) during the present study. In this connection the finding of n=27 for C. haspan by Mehra and Sachdev (1975) and 2n=16 by Sanyal (1972) are significant and these discrepancies might also be due to the complexity in the morphological characters baffling the correct identifi cation. The other two species of the same subgenus cytologically studied were C. arenarius and C. diffusus. Both of them were, however, morphologically distinct and are plants of specialized habitats, the former a seacoast dweller whereas the latter a hill plant. Two species C, compressus and C. iria are grouped under the same section of the subgenus Choristachys of Clarke (in Hooker l. c.) although morphologically they are very distinct. Both the species were cytologically analysed and exact chromo some numbers could not be determined in them due to extremely small size of the pollen mother cells. But they were found to differ widely in their chromosome numbers. There is also great discrepancies in the findings of chromosome numbers for these two species by previous workers. Cyperus distans and C. nutans are morphologically two very allied species and often it is difficult to differentiate them. As Clarke (Hooker l.c.) remarked it is dif ficult to draw a line between this species (C. nutans) and fine examples of C. distans, because the minor difference in the nature of spikelet fails to be the character of practical value. Different forms collected during the present study though initially assigned to the two species, on careful scrutiny all were identified to C. nutans. Number of plants were also cytologically studied all of which were found to be uniformly characterised by n=28 (Fig. 3) as contrast to the finding of 2n=48 for C. distans (Sanyal 1972). 1978 Cytological Studies in Cyperaceae with Special Reference to its Taxonomy II 645 Cyperus michelianus, a species treated under Juncellus and four species of Pycreus studied here, all show same aneuploid variation like the species of Cyperus, though in general these species are characterised by the possession of higher chromo- Figs. 1-6. 1, Cyperus cephalotes, n=21 in diakinesis. 2, C. michelianus, n=39 in diakinesis. 3, C. nutans, n=28 in diakinesis. 4, C. haspan, n=13 in diakinesis. 5, Mariscus compactus, n=43 in diakinesis. 6, Pycreus globosus, n=40 in diakinesis. All •~2500. some numbers (Figs. 2 and 6). This trend, however, is more evident in the members of Mariscus (Fig. 5) and Kyllinga where very high and varied chromosome numbers are seen. 646 S. P. Rath and S. N. Patnaik Cytologia 43 Table 1. 1978 CytologicalStudies in Cyperaceaewith SpecialReference to its Taxonomy II 647 Courtoisia is represented in India by a single species and on morphological grounds is considered to be very close to Mariscus. But Courtoisia cyperoides with haploid chromosome number of n=5 was found to stand out distinctly from all other members of Cyperus group. Species of Eleocharis show considerable variation in chromosome nubmers . E. retroflexa ssp. chaetaria with n=5 (Rath and Patnaik 1974a) and E. atropurpurea with n=10 (Fig. 8) and E. geniculata with n=15 (Fig. 9) studied presently show a distinct euploid series. Eleocharis ovata (2n=10), E. afflata (2n=20) and E. congesta (2n=20) studied by Sanyal and Sharma (1972) from India, all conform to the basic number of x=5. Eleocharis palustris studied by both Sanyal and Sharma Table 1 (contd.) * Chromosome numbers are reported here for the first time . ** Discrepant chromosome numbers are recorded . •õ Authority quoted from Mehra and Sachdev (1975). (1. c.) and Mehra and Sachdev (1975) were found to be characterised by n=7-8. These species are all smaller plants with much smaller spikes. On the otherhand E. acutangula (=E. frstulosa) and E. dulcis are larger and stouter plants with much longer spikes. While E. acutangula was found to be uniformly characterised by n=27 (Fig. 7) from widely different locality, E. dulcis shows a great amount of variation. Plants of this species studied from Smabalpur was found to possess very high chromosome number of n=c. 108 whereas those studied from Bhu baneswar revealed n=38 (Fig. 10). Identification of specimens were carefully checked and it seems there is a great amount of cytotypic variation within this 648 S. P. Rath and S. N. Patnaik Cytologia 43 Figs. 7-13. 7, Eleocharis acutangula, n=27 in diakinesis. 8, E. atropurpurea, n=10 in pollen mitotic metaphase. 9, E. geniculata, n=15 in pollen mitotic metaphase. 10, E. dulcis, n=38 in metaphase I. 11, Rhynchospora wightiana, n=10 in diakinesis. 12, Scirpus erectus, n=37 in metaphase I. 13, S. squarrosus, n=20 in diakinesis. All •~2500. 1978 CytologicalStudies in Cyperaceaewith Special Reference to its Taxonomy II 649 species. This needs a thorough sampling and cytological survey of specimens through the entire range of its distribution. Seven species of Fimbristylis were cytologically studied during the present investigation. These considered along with the previous findings in the genus have important bearing on the taxonomy of the group. Fimbristylis umbellaris was found to possess n=3 (and 2n=6) which is the lowest chromosome number yet recorded not only for Fimbristylis but for the family Cyperaceae as a whole. The three chromosomes in the haploid set were found to be quite distinct in the size as well as in the position of the centromere. Though varied chromosome numbers have been recorded only in a few species of Fimbristylis, most of the species are characterised by chromosome numbers which conform to x=5 as contrast to most of the genera of Cyperaceae except, however, Bulbostylis (Bulbostylis barbata pos sessing n=5, Fig.
Recommended publications
  • Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2016
    Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2016 Revised February 24, 2017 Compiled by Laura Gadd Robinson, Botanist John T. Finnegan, Information Systems Manager North Carolina Natural Heritage Program N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources Raleigh, NC 27699-1651 www.ncnhp.org C ur Alleghany rit Ashe Northampton Gates C uc Surry am k Stokes P d Rockingham Caswell Person Vance Warren a e P s n Hertford e qu Chowan r Granville q ot ui a Mountains Watauga Halifax m nk an Wilkes Yadkin s Mitchell Avery Forsyth Orange Guilford Franklin Bertie Alamance Durham Nash Yancey Alexander Madison Caldwell Davie Edgecombe Washington Tyrrell Iredell Martin Dare Burke Davidson Wake McDowell Randolph Chatham Wilson Buncombe Catawba Rowan Beaufort Haywood Pitt Swain Hyde Lee Lincoln Greene Rutherford Johnston Graham Henderson Jackson Cabarrus Montgomery Harnett Cleveland Wayne Polk Gaston Stanly Cherokee Macon Transylvania Lenoir Mecklenburg Moore Clay Pamlico Hoke Union d Cumberland Jones Anson on Sampson hm Duplin ic Craven Piedmont R nd tla Onslow Carteret co S Robeson Bladen Pender Sandhills Columbus New Hanover Tidewater Coastal Plain Brunswick THE COUNTIES AND PHYSIOGRAPHIC PROVINCES OF NORTH CAROLINA Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2016 Compiled by Laura Gadd Robinson, Botanist John T. Finnegan, Information Systems Manager North Carolina Natural Heritage Program N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources Raleigh, NC 27699-1651 www.ncnhp.org This list is dynamic and is revised frequently as new data become available. New species are added to the list, and others are dropped from the list as appropriate.
    [Show full text]
  • "National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary."
    Intro 1996 National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands The Fish and Wildlife Service has prepared a National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary (1996 National List). The 1996 National List is a draft revision of the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1988 National Summary (Reed 1988) (1988 National List). The 1996 National List is provided to encourage additional public review and comments on the draft regional wetland indicator assignments. The 1996 National List reflects a significant amount of new information that has become available since 1988 on the wetland affinity of vascular plants. This new information has resulted from the extensive use of the 1988 National List in the field by individuals involved in wetland and other resource inventories, wetland identification and delineation, and wetland research. Interim Regional Interagency Review Panel (Regional Panel) changes in indicator status as well as additions and deletions to the 1988 National List were documented in Regional supplements. The National List was originally developed as an appendix to the Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States (Cowardin et al.1979) to aid in the consistent application of this classification system for wetlands in the field.. The 1996 National List also was developed to aid in determining the presence of hydrophytic vegetation in the Clean Water Act Section 404 wetland regulatory program and in the implementation of the swampbuster provisions of the Food Security Act. While not required by law or regulation, the Fish and Wildlife Service is making the 1996 National List available for review and comment.
    [Show full text]
  • C6 Noncarice Sedge
    CYPERACEAE etal Got Sedge? Part Two revised 24 May 2015. Draft from Designs On Nature; Up Your C 25 SEDGES, FOINS COUPANTS, LAÎCHES, ROUCHES, ROUCHETTES, & some mostly wet things in the sedge family. Because Bill Gates has been shown to eat footnotes (burp!, & enjoy it), footnotes are (italicized in the body of the text) for their protection. Someone who can spell caespitose only won way has know imagination. Much of the following is taken verbatim from other works, & often not credited. There is often not a way to paraphrase or rewrite habitat or descriptive information without changing the meaning. I am responsible for any mistakes in quoting or otherwise. This is a learning tool, & a continuation of an idea of my friend & former employer, Jock Ingels, LaFayette Home Nursery, who hoped to present more available information about a plant in one easily accessible place, instead of scattered though numerous sources. This is a work in perpetual progress, a personal learning tool, full uv misstakes, & written as a personal means instead of a public end. Redundant, repetitive, superfluous, & contradictory information is present. It is being consolidated. CYPERACEAE Sauergrasgewächse SEDGES, aka BIESIES, SEGGEN Formally described in 1789 by De Jussieu. The family name is derived from the genus name Cyperus, from the Greek kupeiros, meaning sedge. Many species are grass-like, being tufted, with long, thin, narrow leaves, jointed stems, & branched inflorescence of small flowers, & are horticulturally lumped with grasses as graminoids. Archer (2005) suggests the term graminoid be used for true grasses, & cyperoid be used for sedges. (If physical anthropologists have hominoids & hominids, why don’t we have graminoids & graminids?) There are approximately 104 genera, 4 subfamilies, 14 tribes, & about 5000 species worldwide, with 27 genera & 843 species in North America (Ball et al 2002).
    [Show full text]
  • Viji a R.Pdf
    REVISIONARY STUDIES OF THE FAMILY CYPERACEAE IN KERALA TECHNICAL REPORT BACK TO LAB PROGRAMME (05-31/WSD-BLS/2016/CSTE dated 31-10-2016) WOMEN SCIENTISTS DIVISION KERALA STATE COUNCIL FOR SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT GOVT. OF KERALA Project Period: 20-12-2016 to 31-05-2018 Submitted By Dr. VIJI A. R. (Women Scientist) Dr Preetha T. S. (Scientist Mentor) Department of Botany University College, Palayam, Thiruvananthapuram – 695 034, Kerala June 2018 AUTHORIZATION The work entitled Revisionary Studies of the Family Cyperaceae in Kerala by Dr Viji A. R., was carried out under the Back to lab programme of Women Scientists Division, Kerala State Council for Science Technology and Environment, Govt. of Kerala. The work was carried out at Department of Botany, University College, Palayam, Thiruvananthapuram with Dr Preetha T. S. (Assistant Professor) as Scientist Mentor. The project was sanctioned wide reference No: 05-31/WSD-BLS/2016/CSTE dated 31-10- 2016. The project was concluded on 31/05/2018 with a financial expenditure of Rs. 13,55,184/- 1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS With profound gratitude, I acknowledge the Kerala State Council for Science Technology and Environment (KSCSTE) for the financial assistance through ‘Back to Lab program’ of Women Scientist Division, which helped me to get an independent project with great exposure leading to career development. I would like to thank the research advisory committee of Women Scientist Division KSCSTE, TVM for accepting and sanctioning the project which provided me a great exposure to the research world I am grateful to Dr K.R. Lekha, Head, Women Scientists Division for the encouragement and support throughout the tenure of the project.
    [Show full text]
  • Cyperaceae of Puerto Rico. Arturo Gonzalez-Mas Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 1964 Cyperaceae of Puerto Rico. Arturo Gonzalez-mas Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Recommended Citation Gonzalez-mas, Arturo, "Cyperaceae of Puerto Rico." (1964). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 912. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/912 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This dissertation has been 64—8802 microfilmed exactly as received GONZALEZ—MAS, Arturo, 1923- CYPERACEAE OF PUERTO RICO. Louisiana State University, Ph.D., 1964 B o ta n y University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan CYPERACEAE OF PUERTO RICO A Dissertation I' Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of Botany and Plant Pathology by Arturo Gonzalez-Mas B.S., University of Puerto Rico, 1945 M.S., North Carolina State College, 1952 January, 1964 PLEASE NOTE: Not original copy. Small and unreadable print on some maps. Filmed as received. UNIVERSITY MICROFILMS, INC. ACKNOWLEDGMENT The author wishes to express his sincere gratitude to Dr. Clair A. Brown for his interest, guidance, and encouragement during the course of this investigation and for his helpful criticism in the preparation of the manuscript and illustrations.
    [Show full text]
  • For Enumeration of This Part a Linear Sequence of Lycophytes and Ferns After Christenhusz, M
    PTERIDOPHYTA For enumeration of this part A linear sequence of Lycophytes and Ferns after Christenhusz, M. J. M.; Zhang, X.C. & Schneider, H. (2011) has been followed Subclass: Lycopodiidae Beketov (1863). Order: Selaginellales (1874). Selaginellaceae Willkomm, Anleit. Stud. Bot. 2: 163. 1854; Prodr. FI. Hisp. 1(1): 14. 1861. SELAGINELLA P. Beauvois, Megasin Encycl. 9: 478. 1804. Selaginella monospora Spring, Mém. Acad. Roy. Sci. Belgique 24: 135. 1850; Monogr. Lyc. II:135. 1850; Alston, Bull. Fan. Mem. Inst. Biol. Bot. 5: 288, 1954; Alston, Proc. Nat. Inst. Sc. Ind. 11: 228. 1945; Reed, C.F., Ind. Sellaginellarum 160 – 161. 1966; Panigrahi et Dixit, Proc. Nat. Inst. Sc. Ind. 34B (4): 201, f.6. 1968; Kunio Iwatsuki in Hara, Fl. East. Himal. 3: 168. 1972; Ghosh et al., Pter. Fl. East. Ind. 1: 127. 2004. Selaginella gorvalensis Spring, Monogr. Lyc. II: 256. 1850; Bak, Handb. Fern Allies 107. 1887; Selaginella microclada Bak, Jour. Bot. 22: 246. 1884; Selaginella plumose var. monospora (Spring) Bak, Jour. Bot. 21:145. 1883; Selaginella semicordata sensu Burkill, Rec. Bot. Surv. Ind. 10: 228. 1925, non Spring. Plant up to 90 cm, main stem prostrate, rooting on all sides and at intervals, unequally tetragonal, main stem alternately branched 5 – 9 times, branching unequal, flexuous; leavesobscurely green, dimorphus, lateral leaves oblong to ovate-lanceolate, subacute, denticulate to serrulate at base. Spike short, quadrangular, sporophylls dimorphic, large sporophyls less than half as long as lateral leaves, oblong- lanceolate, obtuse, denticulate, small sporophylls dentate, ovate, acuminate. Fertile: October to January. Specimen Cited: Park, Rajib & AP Das 0521, dated 23. 07.
    [Show full text]
  • National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands 1996
    National List of Vascular Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary Indicator by Region and Subregion Scientific Name/ North North Central South Inter- National Subregion Northeast Southeast Central Plains Plains Plains Southwest mountain Northwest California Alaska Caribbean Hawaii Indicator Range Abies amabilis (Dougl. ex Loud.) Dougl. ex Forbes FACU FACU UPL UPL,FACU Abies balsamea (L.) P. Mill. FAC FACW FAC,FACW Abies concolor (Gord. & Glend.) Lindl. ex Hildebr. NI NI NI NI NI UPL UPL Abies fraseri (Pursh) Poir. FACU FACU FACU Abies grandis (Dougl. ex D. Don) Lindl. FACU-* NI FACU-* Abies lasiocarpa (Hook.) Nutt. NI NI FACU+ FACU- FACU FAC UPL UPL,FAC Abies magnifica A. Murr. NI UPL NI FACU UPL,FACU Abildgaardia ovata (Burm. f.) Kral FACW+ FAC+ FAC+,FACW+ Abutilon theophrasti Medik. UPL FACU- FACU- UPL UPL UPL UPL UPL NI NI UPL,FACU- Acacia choriophylla Benth. FAC* FAC* Acacia farnesiana (L.) Willd. FACU NI NI* NI NI FACU Acacia greggii Gray UPL UPL FACU FACU UPL,FACU Acacia macracantha Humb. & Bonpl. ex Willd. NI FAC FAC Acacia minuta ssp. minuta (M.E. Jones) Beauchamp FACU FACU Acaena exigua Gray OBL OBL Acalypha bisetosa Bertol. ex Spreng. FACW FACW Acalypha virginica L. FACU- FACU- FAC- FACU- FACU- FACU* FACU-,FAC- Acalypha virginica var. rhomboidea (Raf.) Cooperrider FACU- FAC- FACU FACU- FACU- FACU* FACU-,FAC- Acanthocereus tetragonus (L.) Humm. FAC* NI NI FAC* Acanthomintha ilicifolia (Gray) Gray FAC* FAC* Acanthus ebracteatus Vahl OBL OBL Acer circinatum Pursh FAC- FAC NI FAC-,FAC Acer glabrum Torr. FAC FAC FAC FACU FACU* FAC FACU FACU*,FAC Acer grandidentatum Nutt.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 6 ENUMERATION
    Chapter 6 ENUMERATION . ENUMERATION The spermatophytic plants with their accepted names as per The Plant List [http://www.theplantlist.org/ ], through proper taxonomic treatments of recorded species and infra-specific taxa, collected from Gorumara National Park has been arranged in compliance with the presently accepted APG-III (Chase & Reveal, 2009) system of classification. Further, for better convenience the presentation of each species in the enumeration the genera and species under the families are arranged in alphabetical order. In case of Gymnosperms, four families with their genera and species also arranged in alphabetical order. The following sequence of enumeration is taken into consideration while enumerating each identified plants. (a) Accepted name, (b) Basionym if any, (c) Synonyms if any, (d) Homonym if any, (e) Vernacular name if any, (f) Description, (g) Flowering and fruiting periods, (h) Specimen cited, (i) Local distribution, and (j) General distribution. Each individual taxon is being treated here with the protologue at first along with the author citation and then referring the available important references for overall and/or adjacent floras and taxonomic treatments. Mentioned below is the list of important books, selected scientific journals, papers, newsletters and periodicals those have been referred during the citation of references. Chronicles of literature of reference: Names of the important books referred: Beng. Pl. : Bengal Plants En. Fl .Pl. Nepal : An Enumeration of the Flowering Plants of Nepal Fasc.Fl.India : Fascicles of Flora of India Fl.Brit.India : The Flora of British India Fl.Bhutan : Flora of Bhutan Fl.E.Him. : Flora of Eastern Himalaya Fl.India : Flora of India Fl Indi.
    [Show full text]
  • Morphological Diversity of Phytolith Structures in Six Species of Carex L
    BIODIVERSITAS ISSN: 1412-033X Volume 21, Number 8, August 2020 E-ISSN: 2085-4722 Pages: 3471-3486 DOI: 10.13057/biodiv/d210808 Morphological diversity of phytolith structures in six species of Carex L. and Cyperus L. (Cyperaceae Juss.) from West Bengal, India SUBRATA MAJUMDER1, TANMOY MALLICK1,2, ASOK GHOSH1, 1Taxonomy and Biosystematics Laboratory, UGC-CAS Department of Botany (DST-FIST sponsored), The University of Burdwan, Golapbag 713104, West Bengal, India. Tel.: +91-342-2656427, ♥email: [email protected]; [email protected] 2Department of Botany, Ananda Mohan College. 102/1 Raja Rammohon Sarani, Kolkata 700009, West Bengal, India Manuscript received: 19 April 2020. Revision accepted: 7 July 2020. Abstract. Majumder S, Mallick T, Ghosh A. 2020. Morphological diversity of phytolith structures in six species of Carex L. and Cyperus L. (Cyperaceae Juss.) from West Bengal, India. Biodiversitas 21: 3471-3486. Cyperaceae is a taxonomically challenging group due to its cosmopolitan distribution, similar vegetative structure, and reduced reproductive morphology. The present study focused on the characterization and description of phytolith morphotypes based on shape, structure, and ornamentation. Six species of Carex L. and Cyperus L. (three species each) were considered for the present study. From the investigation, we found 56 phytolith morphotypes, among which the principle ones were conical, elongate bulbous margin, lanceolate psilate, tabular concave with verrucate, tabular concave columellate, ovate granulate, and orbicular concave. The conical morphotype was most commonly found. The elongate bulbous margin, lanceolate psilate, and tabular concave with verrucate phytolith morphotypes were specific to the genus Carex, while the tabular concave columellate, ovate granulate and orbicular concave were only found in Cyperus spp.
    [Show full text]
  • Pycerus Polystachyos (Rottb.) J
    The 2nd ICBBB2019 August 13-14, 2019 PO17 Diversity of Cyperacea in University of Mataram Area Wiwin Hidayat1, Via Febrianti1, and Tri Mulyaningsih2* 1Plant Biodiversty Club, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Mataram, Lombok, West Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia. 2Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Mataram, Lombok, West Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia. *Correspondence author: [email protected] ABSTRACT Cyperaceae has a distribution that is almost uniform throughout the world and plays a dominant role in wetland vegetation. The sedge species belonging to Cyperaceae has 106 genera with 5,387 species in the word. These sedges can be used as decoction, paste, powder or poultice in the treatment of various diseases, such as; tumor, heart diseases, malaria fever, stomachache, dysentery, etc. This research was conducted on 25 May to 25 July 2019 and is located in the Mataram University area, Mataram city, Lombok, West Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia. The results of this study found 5 genera with 7 species, namely genus Bulbostylis found 1 species namely Bulbostylis barbata Kunth; Cyperus 3 species namely Cyperus cyproides (L.) Kuntze. Cyperus kyllingia and Cyperus waterloti Cherm; Kyllinga 1 sepcies: Kyllinga brevifolia (Rottb.) Endl; Lipocarpha 1 species: Lipocharpa chinensis (Osbeck.) J.Kern; Pycerus 1 species: Pycerus polystachyos (Rottb.) J. Kern. BACKGROUND METHOD Family of Cyperaceae 106 Genera 5.387 Species This research was conducted on May References : theplantlist.org, to July 2019 and located in the jircas.affrc.go.jp, Cheema (2017), Mataram University area, Mataram Larridon et all. (2013), Govaerts. The decoction Bulbostylis are used in City, Lombok, West Nusa Tenggara. (2007), Vrijidaghs.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2021
    Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2021 Compiled by Brenda L. Wichmann, Botanist North Carolina Natural Heritage Program N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources Raleigh, NC 27699-1601 www.ncnhp.org C ur Alleghany rit Ashe Northampton Gates C uc Surry am k Stokes P d Rockingham Caswell Person Vance Warren a e P s n Hertford e qu Chowan r Granville q ot ui a Mountains Watauga Halifax m nk an Wilkes Yadkin s Mitchell Avery Forsyth Orange Guilford Franklin Bertie Alamance Durham Nash Yancey Alexander Madison Caldwell Davie Edgecombe Washington Tyrrell Iredell Martin Dare Burke Davidson Wake McDowell Randolph Chatham Wilson Buncombe Catawba Rowan Beaufort Haywood Pitt Swain Hyde Lee Lincoln Greene Rutherford Johnston Graham Henderson Jackson Cabarrus Montgomery Harnett Cleveland Wayne Polk Gaston Stanly Cherokee Macon Transylvania Lenoir Mecklenburg Moore Clay Pamlico Hoke Union d Cumberland Jones Anson on Sampson hm Duplin ic Craven Piedmont R nd tla Onslow Carteret co S Robeson Bladen Pender Sandhills Columbus New Hanover Tidewater Coastal Plain Brunswick THE COUNTIES AND PHYSIOGRAPHIC PROVINCES OF NORTH CAROLINA Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2021 Compiled by Brenda L. Wichmann, Botanist North Carolina Natural Heritage Program N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources Raleigh, NC 27699-1601 www.ncnhp.org This list is dynamic and is revised every other year as new data become available. New species are added to the list, and others are dropped from the list as appropriate. Further information may be obtained by contacting the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Department of Natural and Cultural Resources, 1651 MSC, Raleigh, NC 27699-1651; by contacting the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission, 1701 MSC, Raleigh, NC 27699-1701; or by contacting the North Carolina Plant Conservation Program, Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, 1060 MSC, Raleigh, NC 27699-1060.
    [Show full text]
  • Taxonomy and Phylogenetic Position of Fimbristylis Fusiformis, a New Species of Cyperaceae from Thailand
    Blumea 62, 2017: 47–52 ISSN (Online) 2212-1676 www.ingentaconnect.com/content/nhn/blumea RESEARCH ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.3767/000651917X695209 Taxonomy and phylogenetic position of Fimbristylis fusiformis, a new species of Cyperaceae from Thailand K. Wangwasit1, A.M. Muasya2, P. Chantaranothai3, D.A. Simpson4 Key words Abstract Fimbristylis fusiformis, an unusual new species of Cyperaceae from Thailand, is described and illustrated. This taxon has a single terminal spikelet per culm with a semi-distichous glume arrangement, bisexual flowers that conservation status lack perianth parts, and pistil with persistent style whose base is slightly swollen and trigonous nutlets with pubes- Fimbristylis cent ribs. Phylogenetic reconstruction using ITS sequence data places this taxon in Abildgaardieae and sister to phylogeny the rest of Fimbristylis. The species has a conservation status of Least Concern (LC). taxonomy Published on 28 February 2017 INTRODUCTION graphs were generated using a JSM6460LV scanning electron microscope (JEOL Ltd.) The genus Fimbristylis Vahl, comprising c. 300 species, occurs Using a silica gel dried sample of the new taxon, DNA was mostly in the tropics and subtropics with some species occurring extracted using the CTAB method and the ITS marker amplified in warm temperate regions (Govaerts et al. 2007). The genus and sequenced using standard protocols and primers (Muasya is morphologically diverse, with inflorescences ranging from et al. 2014). Contigs of forward and reverse sequences were complex umbel-like structures to a solitary spikelet. The glumes assembled using the STADEN package (Staden 1996). Ad- are generally spirally arranged in ellipsoid spikelets, more rarely ditional ITS DNA sequences, primarily taken from studies of distichously arranged, the bisexual flowers lack perianth parts Abildgaardieae (Ghamkhar et al.
    [Show full text]