“Question Number 1” What, Exactly, Is a Lake Superior Agate?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

“Question Number 1” What, Exactly, Is a Lake Superior Agate? Agatology 101 – Class 15 “Question Number 1” What, Exactly, is a Lake Superior Agate? Well, if we’re going to define what a Lake Superior Agate is, we should first figure out what a “regular agate” is – you know – the good, ol’ fashioned, generic variety. So, to do so, I go to the holder of all knowledge… The sacred tome of eternal information… The lost texts of geological wisdom. I go to… Google. I type, “What is an Agate” and here’s the response I got: 1. an ornamental stone consisting of a hard variety of chalcedony, typically banded in appearance. Trouble is, that also defines banded chert – which is not an agate. And Jasper, when it’s banded – and also, not an agate. Okay, so, that’s the dictionary’s response inside Google. Maybe that isn’t fair, so we should ask another source. Wikipedia describes it more in detail. Agate /ˈæɡət/ is a rock consisting primarily of cryptocrystalline silica, chiefly chalcedony, alternating with microgranular quartz. It is characterized by its fineness of grain and variety of color. Although agates may be found in various kinds of host rock, they are classically associated with volcanic rocks and can be common in certain metamorphic rocks If you read this definition, there are 3 keys that may not be readily apparent. Key #1: chiefly chalcedony, alternating with microgranular quartz. Key #2: they are classically associated with volcanic rocks. Key #3: It’s what they don’t say that’s the real key. If we break this down, Key #1 clearly indicates that banding is required to be considered an agate of any type. The phrase “alternating with microgranular quartz” clearly indicates “banding”. Next, being associated with volcanic rocks is an interesting key but, to some degree, it doesn’t fit with Lake Superior Agates (I’ll discuss further, deeper down in the lesson). And, last, Key #3 is the biggie. What isn’t said is what’s really said. Let me explain. Defining what an agate *IS* can be dicey. Most definitions you’ll run across use similar words: Alternating, Variegated, Banded, Silica, Cryptocrystalline or Microcrystalline Quartz, Chalcedony (pronounced Cal’-said-own-knee – or as some people who don’t know how it’s correctly pronounced say, Cal-said’-a-knee). This pronunciation is an intentional swipe at my good friend Bob whom has corrected me, time and time again, to his way of saying the word. I’m entirely kidding that “they” are pronouncing it incorrectly. It’s much like Poe-TAY-toe versus Poe-TAH-toe. Just depends on where you learned the word. Anyway… I digress. The problem in defining what an agate *is* - lies primarily with the fact that we don’t yet know exactly how agates form. There are lots and lots of books and websites out there that pretend to know (and explain to you) exactly how they were formed. However, if you read Bob and Dan Lynch’s book (commonly referred to as the Agate Bible), they explain that no one yet knows the exact method in which agates form. Other so-called “experts” assign a single paragraph or two and “explain” how they were formed. The sad thing is, however, that every theory put forth to date (as of the typing of this class in January of 2019), has holes in it. This, by definition, presents problems in attempting to define what an agate *is*. Terms like alternating or variegated assume banding. This is not always the case. This ignores a Plume agate. And what about Eye Agates? Or Tubes? Or Stalactite Agates? Or Moss Agates? Or Sagenitic Agates? Or the ever-enigmatic Skip-an-Atom Agates? These are usually ignored in most theories of formation and on most websites. They are the agates that most educators would prefer to not talk about because they throw the proverbial monkey-wrench into many of the theories of formation and, therefore, the definition of what an agate actually *is*. Terms like microgranular quartz make the assumption that every agate has microgranular (larger crystals that appear different to the observer) quartz mixed with the micro or cryptocrystalline quartz that makes up an agate. Again, not always the case. This ignores a paint agate that is entirely red. Or a phrase like, “a hard variety of chalcedony” is an oxymoron. ALL chalcedony has a hardness of 6.5 to 7 on the Mohs Scale of Hardness. There aren’t hard nor soft varieties of chalcedony. It’s all a 6.5 to 7. (Seems like Google, the sacred tome of eternal information maybe has some learning to do?) ☺ Here’s another sticky wicket. As was mentioned before, agates are classically associated with volcanic rocks. This is absolutely true. They are normally associated with volcanic activity. However… There are Lake Superior agates found in Iowa. And southern Minnesota. And even as far south as Kansas. There were never any volcanos down there. Nor iron deposits to stain the agates the distinctive “red” color that’s usually associated with LSA’s. So, without volcanos, iron deposits, or the basic building blocks of Lake Superior agates, how are they down there? Glaciers. They were pushed down south. So, while agates are classically associated with volcanic activity and rocks, remember – forces happen, naturally, that move things around. Agates CAN be found where there was no volcanic activity. So, now that we don’t know what an agate is, let’s further complicate things with, “What is a Lake Superior Agate, specifically?” That should be easier and more clearly defined because it’s a subset of “agates”… right?? Nope. Lake Superior Agates are typically named as such because of the carnelian (the red colored microcrystalline quartz in an LSA). Iron was introduced into the agate while it was forming and it stained the stone the redish color you see in a classic Lake Superior Agate. But not all LSA’s are red or even contain any carnelian. Defining what an agate *is* becomes something elusive. Extremely elusive. Some agates are translucent. Some are not. Some agates are banded. Some are not. Some LSA’s are red and white. Some are not. Some LSA’s contain microgranular quartz. Some do not. Some agates are variegated. Some are not. Some LSA’s have “teeth” or flakes. Most do not. Some have circles called eyes. Some do not. Some have tubes that hollow. Some aren’t hollow. Some don’t have tubes at all. Some are blue. Some are green. Some have plumes. Some were formed in a seam. Some were formed in a cavity called a vesicle. Some have a hole in the middle (making them a special agate called a geode). Some do not. Some have needle sprays. Some do not. Do you see the difficulties in defining these stones that God has given us to obsess over? Trying to give a simple definition that includes all of these amazing natural gems and includes all their differing properties, is nearly impossible. In fact, it hasn’t been done yet. Anywhere. By anyone. The only way to know if something is an LSA or not is to look at it. It’s experience. It’s learning under someone who knows each variety and is able to assist you in seeing the differences. It’s getting outside and looking at THOUSANDS of stones. It isn’t just a matter reading a book or two. Or even a college course or two (I’m sorry Dr. Ojakangas, I absolutely loved your courses and I learned a TON). But, there’s simply no substitute for first hand, on the ground, experience. So, the next time you’re in the Twin Ports – or in Minneapolis – or anywhere else Lake Superior Agates are found, reach out to someone who has been looking at LSA’s for most all their lives. Talk with them and have them go out picking with you. Most of us would love to take time to help you – and show you real-world examples of the different rocks and minerals here in the Northland. Yes, keep reading the lessons. Yes, keep learning from every source you can (making sure they are truly legitimate and not just parroting what they’d heard once). But always remember this… “It’s not what you don’t know that gets you in trouble. It’s what you KNOW – that just ain’t so. THAT’S what get you into trouble.” Learning from people who’ve loved geology their entire lives and have the experience to back up their explanations. That’s who you want to help you learn the answer to “Question 1”: What is A Lake Superior Agate? Copyright © 2019 – Agatology, LLC and Glen Bayless. All Rights Reserved. .
Recommended publications
  • Tiger's Eye Is Not a Pseudomorph Glenn Morita in the Early 1800’S, Mineralogists Recognized That Tiger’S Eye Was a Fibrous Variey of Quartz
    Minutes of the 05/20/03 Westside Board Meeting VP Stu Earnst opened the meeting at 7:31pm. Treasurer’s report read by Kathy Earnst. Minutes approved as published in the newsletter. Old business: Lease on Walker valley discussed. The expiration notice was sent but we are not sure who it went to. We do not see any obstacle to renewal as communication between the council and DNR are open and ongoing. Special thanks, to DNR representative, Laurie Bergvall and DNR staff for their time and effort in hearing our concerns and working towards mutually beneficial solutions on the Walker Valley issues. Sign production is on hold until the sign committee decides where and what the signs will say. We have decided that they will not be on the gate but separate from it. There will be a gate going up at Walker Valley but we will have access to that lock and it will probably be a combo type of thing that we can easily give to other rockhound clubs going there. Talked about the possibility of posing the combo on website but that will depend on the type of gate they put up and what ends up being possible with the mechanics of that gate. New business: Thank you from Bob Pattie and Ed Lehman to Bruce Himko and AAA Printing for donation of the paper. Thank you to Danny Vandenberg for providing sample Walker Valley Material to DNR to show the value of the material we are trying to preserve and enjoy. Bob Pattie is pursuing with the retrieval of our state seized funds through the unclaimed property process.
    [Show full text]
  • Symposium on Agate and Cryptocrystalline Quartz
    Symposium on Agate and Cryptocrystalline Quartz September 10 – 13, 2005 Golden, Colorado Sponsored by Friends of Mineralogy, Colorado Chapter; Colorado School of Mines Geology Museum; and U.S. Geological Survey 2 Cover Photos {top left} Fortification agate, Hinsdale County, Colorado, collection of the Geology Museum, Colorado School of Mines. Coloration of alternating concentric bands is due to infiltration of Fe with groundwater into the porous chalcedony layers, leaving the impermeable chalcedony bands uncolored (white): ground water was introduced via the symmetric fractures, evidenced by darker brown hues along the orthogonal lines. Specimen about 4 inches across; photo Dan Kile. {lower left} Photomicrograph showing, in crossed-polarized light, a rhyolite thunder egg shell (lower left) a fibrous phase of silica, opal-CTLS (appearing as a layer of tan fibers bordering the rhyolite cavity wall), and spherulitic and radiating fibrous forms of chalcedony. Field of view approximately 4.8 mm high; photo Dan Kile. {center right} Photomicrograph of the same field of view, but with a 1 λ (first-order red) waveplate inserted to illustrate the length-fast nature of the chalcedony (yellow-orange) and the length-slow character of the opal CTLS (blue). Field of view about 4.8 mm high; photo Dan Kile. Copyright of articles and photographs is retained by authors and Friends of Mineralogy, Colorado Chapter; reproduction by electronic or other means without permission is prohibited 3 Symposium on Agate and Cryptocrystalline Quartz Program and Abstracts September 10 – 13, 2005 Editors Daniel Kile Thomas Michalski Peter Modreski Held at Green Center, Colorado School of Mines Golden, Colorado Sponsored by Friends of Mineralogy, Colorado Chapter Colorado School of Mines Geology Museum U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Key to Rocks & Minerals Collections
    STATE OF MICHIGAN MINERALS DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY DIVISION A mineral is a rock substance occurring in nature that has a definite chemical composition, crystal form, and KEY TO ROCKS & MINERALS COLLECTIONS other distinct physical properties. A few of the minerals, such as gold and silver, occur as "free" elements, but by most minerals are chemical combinations of two or Harry O. Sorensen several elements just as plants and animals are Reprinted 1968 chemical combinations. Nearly all of the 90 or more Lansing, Michigan known elements are found in the earth's crust, but only 8 are present in proportions greater than one percent. In order of abundance the 8 most important elements Contents are: INTRODUCTION............................................................... 1 Percent composition Element Symbol MINERALS........................................................................ 1 of the earth’s crust ROCKS ............................................................................. 1 Oxygen O 46.46 IGNEOUS ROCKS ........................................................ 2 Silicon Si 27.61 SEDIMENTARY ROCKS............................................... 2 Aluminum Al 8.07 METAMORPHIC ROCKS.............................................. 2 Iron Fe 5.06 IDENTIFICATION ............................................................. 2 Calcium Ca 3.64 COLOR AND STREAK.................................................. 2 Sodium Na 2.75 LUSTER......................................................................... 2 Potassium
    [Show full text]
  • 47. Chert and Porcellanite from Deep Sea Drilling Project Site 436, Northwest Pacific
    47. CHERT AND PORCELLANITE FROM DEEP SEA DRILLING PROJECT SITE 436, NORTHWEST PACIFIC K. A. Pisciotto,1 Earth Science Board, University of California, Santa Cruz, California ABSTRACT Cretaceous chert and porcellanite recovered at Site 436, east of northern Honshu, Japan, are texturally and mineralogically similar to siliceous rocks of comparable age at Sites 303, 304, and 307 in the northwest Pacific. These rocks probably were formed by impregna- tion of the associated pelagic clay with locally derived silica from biogenic and perhaps some volcanic debris. Fine horizontal lamina- tions are the only primary sedimentary structures, suggesting mini- mal reworking and transport. Collapse breccias and incipient chert nodules are diagenetic features related to silicification and compac- tion of the original sediment. Disordered opal-CT (^[101] = 4.09 Å) and microgranular quartz (crystallinity index < 1.0) are the two common silica minerals pres- ent. Some samples show quartz replacing this poorly ordered opal- CT, supporting the notion that opal-CT does not become completely ordered (i.e., d[101] = 4.04 Å) in some cases before being converted to quartz. The present temperature calculated for the depth of the shallowest chert and porcellanite at this site is 30 °C; this may repre- sent the temperature of conversion of opal-CT to quartz. High reflection coefficients (0.29-0.65) calculated for the boundary be- tween chert-porcellanite and clay-claystone support the common observation that chert is a strong seismic reflector in deep-sea sedimentary sections. INTRODUCTION This paper discusses the petrology and origin of cherts and porcellanites at Site 436. In addition, the Keene's (1975, 1976) comprehensive work on cherts temperature of formation and acoustic impedances of and porcellanites from the North Pacific clearly demon- these siliceous rocks are calculated.
    [Show full text]
  • AMETHYSTINE CHALCEDONY by James E
    NOTES ANDa NEW TECHNIQUES AMETHYSTINE CHALCEDONY By James E. Shigley and John I. Koivula A new amethystine chalcedony has been discovered in that this is one of the few reported occurrences Arizona. The material, marketed under the trade name where an amethyst-like, or amethystine, chalced- "Damsonite," is excellent for both jewelry and carv- ony has been found in quantities of gemological ings. The authors describe thegemological properties of importance (see Frondel, 1962). Popular gem this new type of chalcedony, and report the effects of hunters' guides, such as MacFall (1975) and heat treatment on it. Although this purple material is Anthony et al. (19821, describe minor occurrences apparently b.new color type of chalcedony, it has the same gemological properties as the other better-known in Arizona of banded purple agate, but give no types. It corresponds to a microcrystalline form of ame- indication of deposits of massive purple chalced- thyst which, when heat treated at approximately ony similar to that described here. This article 500°C becomes yellowish orange, as does some briefly summarizes the occurrence, gemological single-crystal amethyst. properties, and reaction to heat treatment of this material. LOCALITY AND OCCURRENCE The purple chalcedony described here has been Chalcedony is a microcrystalline form of quartz found at a single undisclosed locality in central that occurs in a wide variety of patterns and colors. Arizona. It was first noted as detrital fragments in Numerous types of chalcedony, such as chryso- the bed of a dry wash that cuts through a series of prase, onyx, carnelian, agate, and others, have been sedimentary rocks.
    [Show full text]
  • Origin of Fibrosity and Banding in Agates from Flood Basalts: American Journal of Science, V
    Agates: a literature review and Electron Backscatter Diffraction study of Lake Superior agates Timothy J. Beaster Senior Integrative Exercise March 9, 2005 Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a Bachelor of Arts degree from Carleton College, Northfield, Minnesota. 2 Table of Contents AGATES: A LITERATURE REVEW………………………………………...……..3 Introduction………………....………………………………………………….4 Structural and compositional description of agates………………..………..6 Some problems concerning agate genesis………………………..…………..11 Silica Sources…………………………………………..………………11 Method of Deposition………………………………………………….13 Temperature of Formation…………………………………………….16 Age of Agates…………………………………………………………..17 LAKE SUPERIOR AGATES: AN ELECTRON BACKSCATTER DIFFRACTION (EBSD) ANALYSIS …………………………………………………………………..19 Abstract………………………………………………………………………...19 Introduction……………………………………………………………………19 Geologic setting………………………………………………………………...20 Methods……………………………………………………...…………………20 Results………………………………………………………….………………22 Discussion………………………………………………………………………26 Conclusions………………………………………………….…………………26 Acknowledgments……………………………………………………..………………28 References………………………………………………………………..……………28 3 Agates: a literature review and Electron Backscatter Diffraction study of Lake Superior agates Timothy J. Beaster Carleton College Senior Integrative Exercise March 9, 2005 Advisor: Cam Davidson 4 AGATES: A LITERATURE REVEW Introduction Agates, valued as semiprecious gemstones for their colorful, intricate banding, (Fig.1) are microcrystalline quartz nodules found in veins and cavities
    [Show full text]
  • Part 629 – Glossary of Landform and Geologic Terms
    Title 430 – National Soil Survey Handbook Part 629 – Glossary of Landform and Geologic Terms Subpart A – General Information 629.0 Definition and Purpose This glossary provides the NCSS soil survey program, soil scientists, and natural resource specialists with landform, geologic, and related terms and their definitions to— (1) Improve soil landscape description with a standard, single source landform and geologic glossary. (2) Enhance geomorphic content and clarity of soil map unit descriptions by use of accurate, defined terms. (3) Establish consistent geomorphic term usage in soil science and the National Cooperative Soil Survey (NCSS). (4) Provide standard geomorphic definitions for databases and soil survey technical publications. (5) Train soil scientists and related professionals in soils as landscape and geomorphic entities. 629.1 Responsibilities This glossary serves as the official NCSS reference for landform, geologic, and related terms. The staff of the National Soil Survey Center, located in Lincoln, NE, is responsible for maintaining and updating this glossary. Soil Science Division staff and NCSS participants are encouraged to propose additions and changes to the glossary for use in pedon descriptions, soil map unit descriptions, and soil survey publications. The Glossary of Geology (GG, 2005) serves as a major source for many glossary terms. The American Geologic Institute (AGI) granted the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (formerly the Soil Conservation Service) permission (in letters dated September 11, 1985, and September 22, 1993) to use existing definitions. Sources of, and modifications to, original definitions are explained immediately below. 629.2 Definitions A. Reference Codes Sources from which definitions were taken, whole or in part, are identified by a code (e.g., GG) following each definition.
    [Show full text]
  • The Lake Superior Agate
    Minnesota Gem: The Lake Superior Agate Its wide distribution and iron-rich bands of color reflect the state gemstone's geologic history in Minnesota Scott F. Wolter N 1969 the dream of Mrs. Jean it was the best choice. The agate IDahlberg was realized: The Lake reflects many aspects of Minnesota. Superior agate was designated by the It was formed during violent, fiery lava Minnesota Legislature as the official eruptions that occurred in our state state gemstone. about a billion years ago. The stone's The late Mrs. Dahlberg, long-time predominant red color comes from rock hound and ardent fan of the agate, iron, the major industrial mineral in testified before the state legislative our state. Finally, the widely distrib- committee considering the bill. She uted agate reveals the impact of gla- knew how perfect the Lake Superior cial movement across Minnesota agate was for the state gemstone. 10,000 to 15,000 years ago. However, there were other logical The Lake Superior agate is inti- candidates. The brazen red Bing- mately related to two prominent geo- hamite and blazing yellow silkstone, logic features of Minnesota: the both iron-rich jaspers found in the majestic and rugged lava flows Cuyuna iron range area, were logical exposed along the shoreline of Lake selections. Thompsonite, the beau- Superior and the lake-freckled glacial tiful and popular zeolite mineral found debris that covers nearly all the state. only in Minnesota on an isolated More than a billion years ago, the stretch along Lake Superior, was North American continent began to another strong candidate.
    [Show full text]
  • Data of Geochemistry
    Data of Geochemistry * Chapter T. Nondetrital Siliceous Sediments GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 440-T Data of Geochemistry Michael Fleischer, Technical Editor Chapter T. Nondetrital Siliceous Sediments By EARLE R. CRESSMAN GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 440-T Tabulation and discussion of chemical analyses of chert with respect to mineralogic composition, petrographic type, and geologic occurrence UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1962 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEW ART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D.C. DATA OP GEOCHEMISTRY, SIXTH EDITION Michael Fleischer, Technical Editor The first edition of the Data of Geochemistry, by F. W. Clarke, was published in 1908 as U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 330. Later editions, also by Clarke, were published in 1911, 1916, 1920, and 1924 as Bul­ letins 491, 616, 695, and 770. This, the sixth edition, has been written by several scientists in the Geological Survey and in other institutions in the United States and abroad, each preparing a chapter on his special field. The current edition is being published in individual chapters, titles of which are listed below. Chapters already published are indicated by boldface type. CHAPTER A. The chemical elements B. Cosmochemistry C. Internal structure and composition of the Earth D. Composition of the earth's crust E. Chemistry of the atmosphere F. Chemical composition of subsurface waters, by Donald E. White, John D. Hem, and G. A. Waring G. Chemical composition of rivers and lakes, by Daniel A. Livingstone H. Chemistry of the oceans I.
    [Show full text]
  • Mineral Collecting Sites in North Carolina by W
    .'.' .., Mineral Collecting Sites in North Carolina By W. F. Wilson and B. J. McKenzie RUTILE GUMMITE IN GARNET RUBY CORUNDUM GOLD TORBERNITE GARNET IN MICA ANATASE RUTILE AJTUNITE AND TORBERNITE THULITE AND PYRITE MONAZITE EMERALD CUPRITE SMOKY QUARTZ ZIRCON TORBERNITE ~/ UBRAR'l USE ONLV ,~O NOT REMOVE. fROM LIBRARY N. C. GEOLOGICAL SUHVEY Information Circular 24 Mineral Collecting Sites in North Carolina By W. F. Wilson and B. J. McKenzie Raleigh 1978 Second Printing 1980. Additional copies of this publication may be obtained from: North CarOlina Department of Natural Resources and Community Development Geological Survey Section P. O. Box 27687 ~ Raleigh. N. C. 27611 1823 --~- GEOLOGICAL SURVEY SECTION The Geological Survey Section shall, by law"...make such exami­ nation, survey, and mapping of the geology, mineralogy, and topo­ graphy of the state, including their industrial and economic utilization as it may consider necessary." In carrying out its duties under this law, the section promotes the wise conservation and use of mineral resources by industry, commerce, agriculture, and other governmental agencies for the general welfare of the citizens of North Carolina. The Section conducts a number of basic and applied research projects in environmental resource planning, mineral resource explora­ tion, mineral statistics, and systematic geologic mapping. Services constitute a major portion ofthe Sections's activities and include identi­ fying rock and mineral samples submitted by the citizens of the state and providing consulting services and specially prepared reports to other agencies that require geological information. The Geological Survey Section publishes results of research in a series of Bulletins, Economic Papers, Information Circulars, Educa­ tional Series, Geologic Maps, and Special Publications.
    [Show full text]
  • The Geological Distribution of Chert in the Brooks Range
    August 30,1995 Price: $2.00 Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys PUBLIC-DATA FILE 95-32 THE GEOLOGICAL DISTRIBUTION OF CHERT IN THE BROOKS RANGE by C.G. Mull August 1995 THIS REPORT HAS NOT BEEN REVIEWED FOR TECHNICAL CONTENT (EXCEPT AS NOTED IN TEXT) OR FOR CONFORMITY TO THE EDITORIAL STANDARDS OF DGGS. Released by STATE OF ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys 794 University Avenue, Suite 200 Fairbanks, Alaska 99709-3645 THE GEOLOGICAL DISTRIBUTION OF QHERT IN THE BROOKS RANGE CONTENTS ABSTRACT THE ORIGIN OF CHERT IN THE BROOKS RANGE DISTRIBUTION OF CHERT IN THE BROOKS RANGE Banded Cav to black chert fLisburne Group) Jet black chert (Akmalik Ched Gray and m-wn n chert @JcsIkpuJs. Fo-atchak . CheN Tan to gray to black banded chert fOt& Formation) Bri~htred, maroon. and gem chert SUMMARY FIGURES Fig. 1. Distribution of Lisburne Group limestone Fig. 2. Distribution of Akrnalik Chert. Fig. 3. Distribution of Siksikpuk Fonnation and Imnaitchiak Chert Fig. 4. Distribution of Otuk Formation. Fig. 5. Distribution of red and green chert THE GEOLOGICAL DISTRIBUTION OF CHERT IN THE BROOKS RANGE Text of a paper read at Alaska Anthropological Association 22nd Annual Meeting, March 23-25,1995, Anchorage, Alaska ABSTRACT Geological mapping in the Brooks Range shows that high quality chert for tool making is abundant in sedimentary rocks in a number of areas along the northern flank and particularly in the foothills of the central and western Brooks Range. These cherts are dominantly black, light to dark gray, greenish gray, banded gray to black, or tan.
    [Show full text]
  • General Information- Michigan's Gem Stones
    CONTENTS: INDUSTRIES MAP —————— FACING I GENERAL INFORMATION- —————— I MICHIGAN'S GEM STONES- —————— 4 ASSAYS AND TESTS———— ————— I I ARTICLES, PERIODICALS, BOOKS- —————12 SOCIETIES—————————————————— ———— 23 MUSEUMS—————————————————— ———— 26 GEOLOGIC TIME SCALE ———— 30 GEOLOGIC MAP —————— ————— 3 I NMICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION ^GEOLOGICAL SURVEY DIVISION FREE DISTRIBUTION ONLY PREFACE TO THIRD EDITION The first edition, published in April, 1958 was needed in responding to queries following a mineral show on the Depart- ment T-V program "Michigan Conservation11. The second edition, July, 1959) was characterized by the addition of the section on gem stones* An abstracted version of the second edition titled "Pebbles to Pendants" was published in the July, 1958 issue of "Michigan Conservation". The present 'third edition is another major revision. Among the new materials added are: l) bedrock geologic map, 2) mineral industries map, 3) rock column and time scale, 4) mineral and fossil sketches, and 5) locality sketch maps* These, along with the cover, were prepared by Jim Campbell of our staff. The book list has been expanded and several titles were added to the articles list. Suggestions received from Arthur Johnstone, of the Michigan Mineralogical Society, were particularly helpful. Information regarding mineral and lapidary businesses may be found in the appropriate advertising media as well as from many of the clubs. Robert W. Kelley, Geologist Geological Survey Division Michigan Dept. Conservation March, I960 Lansing MICHIGAN'S MIN ERAL EXTRACTING INDUSTRIES D NON-METALLIC B BRINE H SALT 0 CLAY 0 SHALE 9 DOLOMITE H LIMESTONE 13 SAND& GRAVELCPRINCIPAL AREA) H GLASS SAND 0 GYPSUM B SANDSTONE D MARLCPRINCIPAL AREA) B PEAT • MISCELLANEOUS STONE A METALLIC L COPPER A IRON O FUELS <D GAS • OIL MAJOR FIELDS € OIL & GAS INDIANA O H I O GENERAL INFORMATION INTRODUCTION Interest in collecting minerals and gem stones and in doing lapidary work certainly is on the increase today.
    [Show full text]