DOCSLIB.ORG

Management Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Management Plan Ecoforestry Management Plan Wildwood Forest Cedar, BC Ecoforesty Institute Society First Update , May 2016 Contact The Original Author : Chris Walther, B.Sc, RPF P.O. Box 256 Union Bay, BC V0R 3B0 Tel.: (250) 650 - 0547 Or The Lead for The First Update : Peter Jungwirth, RPF, Courtenay, BC, 250 - 334 - 4559, [email protected] Table of Contents 1. Summary ................................ ................................ ................................ ................. 5 2. Premise ................................ ................................ ................................ .................... 6 3. Property Details ................................ ................................ ................................ ....... 8 3.1. Administrative: ................................ ................................ ................................ 8 3.1.1. Legal Description: ................................ ................................ .................... 8 3.1.2. Overview Map: ................................ ................................ ........................ 8 3.1.3. Zoning: ................................ ................................ ................................ .... 8 3.1.4. Higher Level Plans: ................................ ................................ .................. 9 3.1.5. Ownership: ................................ ................................ ............................... 9 3.1.5.1. The Ecoforestry Institute Society (EIS): ................................ ............... 9 3.1.6. Area Summary: ................................ ................................ ...................... 10 3.2. Physical and Climatic Details: ................................ ................................ ........ 11 3.2.1. Geophysical summary: ................................ ................................ ........... 11 3.2.2. Climate: ................................ ................................ ................................ 11 4. Management Goals, Objectives, and Strategies: ................................ ..................... 12 4.1. Goals ................................ ................................ ................................ ............. 12 4.2. Objectives: ................................ ................................ ................................ ..... 12 4.3. Strategy ................................ ................................ ................................ ......... 13 4.4. Departure from other management plans: ................................ ....................... 13 5. Values & Resources: ................................ ................................ .............................. 14 5.1. Geophysical ................................ ................................ ................................ ... 14 5.1.1. Terrain ................................ ................................ ................................ ... 14 5.1.2. Soil ................................ ................................ ................................ ........ 14 5.1.3. Soil Management: ................................ ................................ .................. 14 5.1.4. Water ................................ ................................ ................................ ..... 15 5.1.4.1. Surface Waters: ................................ ................................ .................. 15 5.1.4.2. Groundwater: ................................ ................................ ..................... 16 5.1.5. Management of Water Resources: ................................ .......................... 16 5.1.5.1. Development Permit Areas 5 (DPA): ................................ .................. 17 5.1.5.2. Riparian Assessment Areas (RAA), DPA 6: ................................ ....... 17 5.2. Biodiversity, Ecological & Biological resources ................................ ............. 18 5.2.1. Sensitive Ecosystems ................................ ................................ ............. 18 5.2.1.1. Management Goal: ................................ ................................ ............. 18 5.2.1.2. Manageme nt objective: ................................ ................................ ....... 19 5.2.2. Red & Blue listed plant communities ................................ ..................... 20 5.2.2.1. Management goal: ................................ ................................ .............. 20 5.2.2.2. Management objective: ................................ ................................ ....... 20 5.2.3. Animals ................................ ................................ ................................ .. 20 5.2.4. Plants ................................ ................................ ................................ ..... 20 5.2.5. Fungi ................................ ................................ ................................ ...... 21 5.2.6. Big Snags and Full - Cycle Trees ................................ ............................. 21 5.2.7. Special Sites ................................ ................................ ........................... 21 5.3. Cultural / Social values ................................ ................................ .................. 21 5.3.1. Utilities ................................ ................................ ................................ .. 21 5.3.2. Historical ................................ ................................ ............................... 21 5.3.3. Archaeological & Traditional Use: ................................ ......................... 22 5.3.4. Recreational ................................ ................................ ........................... 23 5.3.4.1. Management Goal: ................................ ................................ ............. 23 5.3.4.2. Management Objective: ................................ ................................ ...... 23 5.3.5. Visual ................................ ................................ ................................ ..... 23 5.3.6. Educational ................................ ................................ ............................ 23 5.3.6.1. Management Goals: ................................ ................................ ............ 23 5.3.6.2. Management Objectives: ................................ ................................ .... 23 5.3.7. Spiritual ................................ ................................ ................................ 24 5.3.7.1. Goal: ................................ ................................ ................................ .. 24 5.3.7.2. Objective: ................................ ................................ ........................... 24 5.4. Timber Resources ................................ ................................ .......................... 25 5.4.1. Natural Disturbance and Range of Natural Variability ............................ 25 5.4.2. AAC ................................ ................................ ................................ ...... 25 5.4.2.1. Settings for this Simulation: ................................ ................................ 25 5.4.2.2. AAC for East side of Quennel Lake only: ................................ ........... 26 5.4.2.3. Summary Graphs for volume and age classes: ................................ .... 26 5.4.2.4. Comparison with Industrial Scenario: ................................ ................. 28 5.4.3. Harvesting Goals: ................................ ................................ ................... 30 5.4.3.1. Maintain Natural Disturbance Regimes: ................................ ............. 30 5.4.3.2. Operational Goals: ................................ ................................ .............. 30 5.4.3.3. Harvest Objectives ................................ ................................ ............. 30 5.4.3.4. Harvest Priority ................................ ................................ .................. 31 5.4.4. Harvest Monitoring ................................ ................................ ................ 31 5.4.5. Harvest – Administrative Considerations ................................ ................ 32 5.4.6. Harvest Activities in the next 10 years (2016 – 2026): ............................ 32 5.4.7. Access: ................................ ................................ ................................ ... 33 5.4.7.1. Access Planning: ................................ ................................ ................ 33 5.4.7.2. Access Maintenance: ................................ ................................ .......... 33 5.4.8. Silviculture: ................................ ................................ ............................ 33 5.4.8.1. Regeneration: ................................ ................................ ..................... 33 5.4.8.2. Spacing: ................................ ................................ ............................. 33 5.4.8.3. Fertilization: ................................ ................................ ....................... 34 5.4.8.4. Brushing: ................................ ................................ ............................ 34 5.4.9. Coarse Woody Debris (CWD): ................................ ............................... 34 5.4.9.1. Management Goal: ................................ ................................ ............. 34 5.4.9.2. Objective: ................................ ................................ ..........................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Silvicultural Systems and Regeneration Methods: Current Practices and New Alternatives 153
    Silvicultural Systems and 9 Regeneration Methods: Current Practices and New Alternatives John C. Tappeiner, Denis Lavender, Jack Walstad, Robert O. Curtis, and Dean S. DeBell Development of Regeneration Practices 151 Early Logging Practices and Regeneration Methods 152 Studies of Natural Regeneration Processes 153 Artificial ConiferRegeneration 154 Producing Stands of Diverse Structures and Habitats 156 At Harvest 156 Young Stand Establishment 158 Regeneration inYoung to Mature Stands 158 Natural Succession 159 Conclusion 160 Literature Oted 160 In this chapter, we discuss silvicuItural systems and objective 1, and considerable wildlife habitat and regeneration methods to meet the needs of society other values can be provided while producing rela­ over the next several decades. We begin with a brief tively high yields of wood under objective 2. The history of silvicuItural systems and what we have knowledge and skills are available to pursue both ob­ learned about forest regeneration.in the Pacific jectives effectively. Moreover, many ownerswill likely Northwest. We then discuss how regeneration meth­ manage their forests under both approaches. ods might evolve over the next several decades. We believe that the practice of silviculture gen­ erally will be applied to two different forest man­ Development of Regeneration Practices agement philosophies and objectives, providing (1) old-forest characteristics and (2) wood production. Traditional methods for regenerating forests as part Significant amounts of wood can be produced under of a timber harvest fall into two broad categories: (1) 151 152 Section ll. Silvicultural Systems and Management Concerns even-age management systems, which include clear­ drew heavily on European experience and called for cutting, shelterwood, and seed-tree methods, and (2) intensive practices and detailed stand analyses.
    [Show full text]
  • FORESTRY SECTOR POLICY GOAL, OBJECTIVES and STRATEGIES
    National Forest Policy, Timor-Leste, December 2005 SUPPORT for the FORMULATION of a NATIONAL FOREST POLICY STATEMENT – TIMOR LESTE FORESTRY SECTOR POLICY GOAL, OBJECTIVES and STRATEGIES Introduction The National Development Plan (2002) assigns the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry (MAFF) as the Government agency having prime responsibility for forestry development. New law defined the Ministry’s mandate and structure in 2002. The National Directorate of Coffee and Forestry (NDCF) is one of three national directorates within the ministry and has broad responsibilities for community forestry, watershed management, forest protection, plantation forestry, protected natural areas development and other aspects of forestry development. The National Development Plan emphasises a sustainable approach to the development and management of the forest resources of the country. It recognizes that forests are important for their biological diversity and that forest conservation is a priority task in forest development planning. National development strategies recognise the limited ability of NDCF to support field programmes and it asserts that they will mainly focus on improving that capability and assist in providing the basic steps that will enable the NDCF to work towards achieving the national objective of sustainable forest management. The strategies also attempt to make a contribution to other relevant Government short-term objectives, such as rural poverty alleviation. The NDCF will make a major contribution towards combating deforestation and forest degradation by initiating, in close cooperation with other sections of MAFF, a series of integrated programmes that will closely involve rural communities. Emphasis will be placed on reducing the adverse effects of shifting cultivation and other pressures on forests and encouraging the participation of communities to protect forests and watersheds.
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Management Planning
    Forest Management Planning Basic knowledge Welcome to the Forest Management Planning Module. This module is intended for forest owners and managers wishing to plan SFM activities and to enable monitoring and control. The module provides information and links to tools and case studies, to guide users in planning the implementation of SFM at the forest management unit level. Forest management is the process of planning and implementing practices for the stewardship and use of forests and other wooded land targeted at specific environmental, economic, social and cultural objectives. Forest management planning is a fundamental component of SFM, and it may be required at various scales, from local to national; this module focuses on the local (or forest management unit) scale. The role of forest management planning is to determine and express the objectives of forest management in a specified area of forest and to set out the steps to be taken to achieve those objectives. Forest management planning is important for many reasons. For example, it can: help forest owners and managers identify what they want from the forest and provide an efficient course of action to meet those objectives; provide a means by which stakeholders can participate in forest management and ensure clarity on the roles and responsibilities of the various stakeholders; ensure the existence and functionality of the resource while also increasing its value (e.g. specifying where, how and under what conditions and constraints the resource may be used); save time and reduce costs (e.g. in road construction and wood harvesting); reduce risks and their impacts and avoid potentially costly forest management mistakes (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Fifth World Forestry Congress
    Proceedings of the Fifth World Forestry Congress VOLUME 1 RE University of Washington, Seattle, Washington United States of America August 29September 10, 1960 The President of the United States of America DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER Patron Fifth World Forestry Congress III Contents VOLUME 1 Page Chapter1.Summary and Recommendations of the Congress 1 Chapter 2.Planning for the Congress 8 Chapter3.Local Arrangements for the Congress 11 Chapter 4.The Congress and its Program 15 Chapter 5.Opening Ceremonies 19 Chapter6. Plenary Sessions 27 Chapter 7.Special Congress Events 35 Chapitre 1.Sommaire et recommandations du Congrès 40 Chapitre 2.Preparation des plans en vue du Congrès 48 Chapitre 3.Arrangements locaux en vue du Congrès 50 Chapitre 4.Le Congrès et son programme 51 Chapitre 5.Cérémonies d'ouverture 52 Chapitre 6.Seances plénières 59 Chapitre 7.Activités spéciales du Congrès 67 CapItullo1. Sumario y Recomendaciones del Congreso 70 CapItulo 2.Planes para el Congreso 78 CapItulo 3.Actividades Locales del Congreso 80 CapItulo 4.El Congreso y su Programa 81 CapItulo 5.Ceremonia de Apertura 81 CapItulo 6.Sesiones Plenarias 88 CapItulo 7.Actos Especiales del Congreso 96 Chapter8. Congress Tours 99 Chapter9.Appendices 118 Appendix A.Committee Memberships 118 Appendix B.Rules of Procedure 124 Appendix C.Congress Secretariat 127 Appendix D.Machinery Exhibitors Directory 128 Appendix E.List of Financial Contributors 130 Appendix F.List of Participants 131 First General Session 141 Multiple Use of Forest Lands Utilisation multiple des superficies boisées Aprovechamiento Multiple de Terrenos Forestales Second General Session 171 Multiple Use of Forest Lands Utilisation multiple des superficies boisées Aprovechamiento Multiple de Terrenos Forestales Iv Contents Page Third General Session 189 Progress in World Forestry Progrés accomplis dans le monde en sylviculture Adelantos en la Silvicultura Mundial Section I.Silviculture and Management 241 Sessions A and B.
    [Show full text]
  • Old-Growth Forests
    Pacific Northwest Research Station NEW FINDINGS ABOUT OLD-GROWTH FORESTS I N S U M M A R Y ot all forests with old trees are scientifically defined for many centuries. Today’s old-growth forests developed as old growth. Among those that are, the variations along multiple pathways with many low-severity and some Nare so striking that multiple definitions of old-growth high-severity disturbances along the way. And, scientists forests are needed, even when the discussion is restricted to are learning, the journey matters—old-growth ecosystems Pacific coast old-growth forests from southwestern Oregon contribute to ecological diversity through every stage of to southwestern British Columbia. forest development. Heterogeneity in the pathways to old- growth forests accounts for many of the differences among Scientists understand the basic structural features of old- old-growth forests. growth forests and have learned much about habitat use of forests by spotted owls and other species. Less known, Complexity does not mean chaos or a lack of pattern. Sci- however, are the character and development of the live and entists from the Pacific Northwest (PNW) Research Station, dead trees and other plants. We are learning much about along with scientists and students from universities, see the structural complexity of these forests and how it leads to some common elements and themes in the many pathways. ecological complexity—which makes possible their famous The new findings suggest we may need to change our strat- biodiversity. For example, we are gaining new insights into egies for conserving and restoring old-growth ecosystems. canopy complexity in old-growth forests.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Habitat Fragmentation and Ecosystem Connectivity Within the Castle Parks, Alberta, Canada by Breanna Beaver Submit
    Analysis of Habitat Fragmentation and Ecosystem Connectivity within The Castle Parks, Alberta, Canada by Breanna Beaver Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in the Environmental Science Program YOUNGSTOWN STATE UNIVERSITY December, 2017 Analysis of Habitat Fragmentation and Ecosystem Connectivity within The Castle Parks, Alberta, Canada Breanna Beaver I hereby release this thesis to the public. I understand that this thesis will be made available from the OhioLINK ETD Center and the Maag Library Circulation Desk for public access. I also authorize the University or other individuals to make copies of this thesis as needed for scholarly research. Signature: Breanna Beaver, Student Date Approvals: Dawna Cerney, Thesis Advisor Date Peter Kimosop, Committee Member Date Felicia Armstrong, Committee Member Date Clayton Whitesides, Committee Member Date Dr. Salvatore A. Sanders, Dean of Graduate Studies Date Abstract Habitat fragmentation is an important subject of research needed by park management planners, particularly for conservation management. The Castle Parks, in southwest Alberta, Canada, exhibit extensive habitat fragmentation from recreational and resource use activities. Umbrella and keystone species within The Castle Parks include grizzly bears, wolverines, cougars, and elk which are important animals used for conservation agendas to help protect the matrix of the ecosystem. This study identified and analyzed the nature of habitat fragmentation within The Castle Parks for these species, and has identified geographic areas of habitat fragmentation concern. This was accomplished using remote sensing, ArcGIS, and statistical analyses, to develop models of fragmentation for ecosystem cover type and Digital Elevation Models of slope, which acted as proxies for species habitat suitability.
    [Show full text]
  • Gets President's Ear New Forestry' Guru Gunman Kills 8 in San Francisco
    The administrations first priority is _iv to get federal timber sales released from MICHAEL LLOYD/The Oregonian court injunctions that have been in 9 Monte Dahlstrom (left) and his brother, Kirk, timber workers from Hoquiam, Wash., respond to President eves forest decision place since 1991 and return forest man- Thursday, "Were so sit.k of the government. All theyve done is talk. Is this Just more talk? I dont know,," Mirk Dahlstrom said. agement to the U.S. Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management, he said. ease timber communities through a Earlier Thursday a somber Clinton, tough transition. flanked by Vice President Al Gore and "The plan is more difficult than I four Cabinet members at a Washington, thought it would be in terms of the sizes D.C., news conference, called his plan of the timber cuts. in no small mea- Q: DOES THE CLINTON PLAN PROTECT OLD-GROWTH FORESTS? Q: HOW MANY JOBS WILL BE LOST? "a departure from the failed policies of A: the past." He said it will protect the en- Please turn to Yes. It protects 3.67 million forested acres in a system of A: By 1994, when the plan is in effect, timber jobs in the owl vironment, break legal gridlock and PLAN, Page A14 reserves stretching over 8.6 million acres from the Canadian region are expected to decline by an additional 6,000 from the border to Northern California. About 80 percent of the 1992 employment level of 125,400. Most job losses already Northwests remaining old-growth forests will be included in have occurred.
    [Show full text]
  • Reflections from the XIV World Forestry Congress
    Infosheet October, 2015 Tropenbos International Reflections from the XIV World Forestry Congress Held only every six years, this largest gathering of forestry expertise is looked upon from around the world to see what has changed, is changing, should change… The website proudly stated that “The XIV World Forestry Congress (WFC) aims to build a new vision – a new way of thinking and acting – for the future of forests and forestry in sustainable development at all levels.” However, the vision in the final congress declaration contained no really new perspectives, but rather it reconfirmed the evolving thinking on the role of forests and forestry. “Forests are more than trees”, integrated approaches and engaging/connecting with other sectors and actors are the way forward, and forests are an essential solution to climate change and in achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. The congress was well organized nonetheless, and offered a large platform, also for people who matter but who are not usually seen in the international arena, to also share their experiences so that others from similar contexts could learn from the successes and improve on their own situations. The crucial role of the youth in sustainable forest management was emphasized, and the congress gave younger people the opportunity to learn. The representation of farm forest producer organizations and the great advances made by community forestry, particularly in the Far East Asian countries and also in South Africa was impressive, and the need to facilitate the formation of an association of tree farmers and their linkage to international tree farmers’ associations became more apparent.
    [Show full text]
  • Accelerating the Development of Old-Growth Characteristics in Second-Growth Northern Hardwoods
    United States Department of Agriculture Accelerating the Development of Old-growth Characteristics in Second-growth Northern Hardwoods Karin S. Fassnacht, Dustin R. Bronson, Brian J. Palik, Anthony W. D’Amato, Craig G. Lorimer, Karl J. Martin Forest Northern General Technical Service Research Station Report NRS-144 February 2015 Abstract Active management techniques that emulate natural forest disturbance and stand development processes have the potential to enhance species diversity, structural complexity, and spatial heterogeneity in managed forests, helping to meet goals related to biodiversity, ecosystem health, and forest resilience in the face of uncertain future conditions. There are a number of steps to complete before, during, and after deciding to use active management for this purpose. These steps include specifying objectives and identifying initial targets, recognizing and addressing contemporary stressors that may hinder the ability to meet those objectives and targets, conducting a pretreatment evaluation, developing and implementing treatments, and evaluating treatments for success of implementation and for effectiveness after application. In this report we discuss these steps as they may be applied to second-growth northern hardwood forests in the northern Lake States region, using our experience with the ongoing managed old-growth silvicultural study (MOSS) as an example. We provide additional examples from other applicable studies across the region. Quality Assurance This publication conforms to the Northern Research Station’s Quality Assurance Implementation Plan which requires technical and policy review for all scientific publications produced or funded by the Station. The process included a blind technical review by at least two reviewers, who were selected by the Assistant Director for Research and unknown to the author.
    [Show full text]
  • Effect of Forest Fire on Tree Diversity and Regeneration Potential in a Tropical
    Verma et al. Ecological Processes (2017) 6:32 DOI 10.1186/s13717-017-0098-0 RESEARCH Open Access Effect of forest fire on tree diversity and regeneration potential in a tropical dry deciduous forest of Mudumalai Tiger Reserve, Western Ghats, India Satyam Verma, Dharmatma Singh, Sathya Mani and Shanmuganathan Jayakumar* Abstract Introduction: The study was conducted in Mudumalai Tiger Reserve, in the Western Ghats to understand the effect of a single fire event on tree diversity and regeneration status. Four forest patches were selected which were unburned, 2-year-old burn, 5-year-old burn, and 15-year-old burn. Three 0.1 ha square plots were laid randomly in all four patches and analyzed for tree diversity, stand structure, and regeneration of tree species. Results: A total of 4129 individuals of tree species were recorded in field surveys, comprising 3474 seedlings, 121 saplings, and 534 trees. Totally, 40 tree species were recorded in study plots, from which 28 species were seedlings, 16 species were saplings, and 37 species were at tree stages. Conclusions: Tree diversity decreased in 2-year-old and 5-year-old burnt plots and was reached to the level of unburnt plots in 15 years of interval. Stems of small size classes started increasing after the fire. Seedling density increased linearly in subsequent years after fire but sapling and tree density recorded less than control in B2 but was higher in B5 and B15. The overall fire affected diversity, but regeneration showed a positive trend. Keywords: Dry deciduous forest, Forest fire, Fire mapping, Regeneration, Western Ghats Introduction seeds near the soil surface (Balch et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Seral Stages
    WHITE PAPER USDA Forest Service Pacific Northwest Region Umatilla National Forest White Paper F14-SO-WP-Silv-10 November 2012 A Stage Is A Stage Is A Stage…Or Is It? Successional Stages, Structural Stages, Seral Stages David C. Powell; Forest Silviculturist Umatilla National Forest; Pendleton, OR Initial Version: APRIL 1996 INTRODUCTION A landmark book called “Wildlife Habitats in Managed Forests: the Blue Mountains of Oregon and Washington” was published in 1979 (Thomas 1979). This book examined the effects of management activities on wildlife habitat, particularly the impact of timber management practices on large, free-ranging ungulates (e.g., deer and elk). Among other things, the Blue Mountains book also attempted to correlate wildlife habitat with vegetation seral status by using a successional stage classification system. As a result of the book’s popularity with natural resource managers, use of its succes- sional stage classification became common in the Blue Mountains (fig. 1). Shortly after publication of the Wildlife Habitats book, the Umatilla National Forest ini- tiated a planning process in response to the National Forest Management Act of 1976. The planning process consumed an entire decade and culminated with publication of a Land and Resource Management Plan (e.g., Forest Plan) in 1990 (USDA Forest Service 1990). The Land and Resource Management Plan (Forest Plan) for the Umatilla National Forest (USDA Forest Service 1990) established specific standards related to seral (suc- cessional) stages for three management allocation areas (A10, C4, and E2). The seral stage system used in the Forest Plan is the same as the successional stage system de- scribed in the Wildlife Habitats book (Thomas 1979).
    [Show full text]
  • How to Transform Your Yard Into a Food Forest
    edible Landscaping: How to transform your yard into a food forest. a manualfesto jayme margaret melrose: garden doula participating members of a comprehensive earth community spectrum of (forest) gardening ecological organic gardening forest ecoforestry Cultivated...landscaping farming gardening ...wildernesSparks hands on hands off 6 easy edible landscaping tips 1. use formal designs filled with vegetables. 2. plant kale & chard as ornamental annuals. 3. Grow edible flowers. 4. Trellis with climbing beans or peas. Chives Red clover Borage Lilac Lavender Roses Daylillies Tulips Dandelions Nasturiums Pansies Violets Carnations Stocks Bachelor buttons Dahlias Bee balm California poppy Calendula Daisy Phlox Hosta Hosta fortunei Snapdragon Fuschia Columbines 5. use highbush blueberries as ornamental shrubs. 2 varieties to polinate! 6. plant fruit trees. Espallier, container, or standard trees. apples. pears. cherries. peaches. plums. apricots. persimmons. quince. Perennial food plants: Perennial food plants: Asparagus Chives Walking onions Rhubarb Stinging nettle Sorrel Jerusalem artichokes Fiddleheads Mushrooms Nuts Fruit Berries Seakale - Crambe maritima Tea herbs Culinary herbs Medicinal herbs native food plants: native food plants: Oak - acorns Beech - nut Sugar maple - syrup Butternut - nut Beaked hazelnut Serviceberry Chokecherry Chokeberry Cranberry Huckleberry Blueberry Blackberry Bunchberry Highbush cranberry - Viburnum opulus Wild raisin - Viburnum nudum Ostrich fern - fiddleheads Indian potato - tuber Sweetfern - tea leaves Labrador tea - tea leaves Bog rosemary - tea & seasoning circa 1850 View from Dartmouth Common Watercolors by Mercer View from halifax Common towards NorthWest arm black walnut beech butternut hickory chestnut beaked hazelnut pecan New England nut trees Indian Potato: Apios americana edible forest gardening is: - an edible ecosystem: a consciously designed community of mutually beneficial plants and animals intended for human food production.
    [Show full text]