DOCSLIB.ORG

1. Hyracotherium Is the Ancestor of the Modern Horse. They Both Have Similar Skull Features Such As, Shape, Space Between Front and Back Teeth

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
1. Hyracotherium Is the Ancestor of the Modern Horse. They Both Have Similar Skull Features Such As, Shape, Space Between Front and Back Teeth Name Date Period BLUE REIVEW UNIT TEST: THE HISTORY OF LIFE ON EARTH Complete the following questions using your HMH Book (mod D), notes (see power point on the web page), packet 11 and your corrected assignments. FOSSILS AND THE FOSSIL RECORD: 1. Write a number (1 – 4) in front of each statement to indicate the correct sequence (order) for fossil formation. ______3____Layers of sediment bury the entire skeleton. ______4____Sediment builds up and turns to rock. ____1______An organism dies, and its body begins to decompose. ______2____Sediment begins to cover the organism’s skeleton. 2. The diagram shows a portion of the fossil record in sedimentary rock. Different rock layers and fossils are clearly visible. a) Identify the oldest and the youngest layers of rock. D = oldest; A = youngest b) Which fossils are the most recent? How do you know? Fossils in layer A, this is the newest, topmost layer. c) Where were these fossils formed? How do you know? In the ocean. There are shells and fish skeletons 3. Hyracotherium is the genus of the earliest known ancestor of the horse, and Equus is the genus of the modern horse. The image shows the change in the horse’s skull over time. Formulate 2 conclusions about the evolution of the horse, supported by this evidence. 1. Hyracotherium is the ancestor of the modern horse. They both have similar skull features such as, shape, space between front and back teeth. 2. The horse got larger over time. Name Date Period 4. Use the graph below to answer the question that follows. a) How many mass extinctions have occurred? _five (5) 5.Over time the number of life forms on Earth has gotten larger, there are many more different life forms. Name Date Period . Write true if the statement is true or false if the statement is false. 1. TRUE Fossils provide clear evidence that evolution has occurred. 2. TRUE Embryos of many different vertebrates look much more similar than the adult organisms. 3. FALSE Darwin’s comparison of DNA sequences provided strong evidence of evolution. 4. TRUE Today’s scientists compare the anatomy, embryos, and DNA of modern organisms to understand how they evolved. 5. FALSE Homologous structures are structures that are different in related organisms because they were inherited from a common ancestor. 6. TRUE Comparative anatomy is the study of the similarities and differences in the structures of different species. 7. TRUE Homologous embryology is the study of the similarities and differences in the embryos of different species. 8. TRUE The wings of bats and birds serve the same function and are homologous structures. 9. TRUE DNA sequence similarities are the strongest evidence for evolution from a common ancestor. Name Date Period Multiple Choice Circle the letter of the correct choice. 1. Evidence of evolution includes (a) DNA sequence analysis. (b) the fossil record. (c) anatomical evidence. (d) all of the above 2. Which of the following is true about horse evolution? (1) Early horses were about the size of a fox. (2) Early horses had toes. (3) During evolution, their molars became covered with cement. (a) 1 only (b) 1 and 2 (c) 2 and 3 (d) 1, 2, and 3 3. An example of a vestigial structure is the (a) kangaroo pouch. (b) human tail bone. (c) cat forelimb. (d) all of the above 4. The strongest evidence for evolution from a common ancestor is (a) similar DNA sequences. (b) similar body structures. (c) similar embryological structures. (d) (d) similar fossils Vocabulary I Match the vocabulary word with the proper definition. Terms B 5. the study of the similarities and a. comparative anatomy differences in the embryos of different species b. comparative embryology c. DNA sequences d. fossils e. homologous structure f. vestigial structure Definitions C 1. the strongest evidence for evolution from a common ancestor _E 2. structures that are similar in related organisms because they were inherited from a common ancestor D 3. provide clear evidence that evolution has occurred F 4. reduced structures that are no longer used Name Date Period A 6. the study of the similarities and differences in the structures of different species ANSWERS VOCABULARY II 1. DNA 2. HOMOLOGOUS 3. ANATOMY 4. FOSSILS 5. VESTIGIAL 6. HOMOLOGOUS 7. EMBRYOLOGY 8. ANATOMY, STRUCTURE ARRANGEMENT Use your notes and text book HMH to 8. Reasons why species would become answer the following as a study guide extinct after environmental changes. 9. Human causes of extinction 1. Speciation (pg 116-120) 10. Know the terms Genus and Species 2. Species (DEFINE) A GROUP OF CLOSELY (Scientific name) RELATED INDIVIDUALS THAT CAN 11. Evidence of Evolution (FAME) (pg 4-8, PRODUCE OFFSPRING THAT ARE 17-18) THEMSELVES ABLE TO PRODUCE 12. Fossil Record. OFFSPRING 13. How do we use the fossil record? 3. Causes of speciation: Reproductive 14. Fossils represent what percentage of Isolation (causes of reproductive species ___________ isolation) and Geographical Isolation (explain what causes each isolation 15. Describe how fossils are formed give examples) 4. What method is used to determine if speciation has occurred? 5. Extinction (pg. 121-124) 6. Examples of extinction 7. Causes of mass extinctions Name Date Period 16. Anatomy (comparative anatomy): Homologous and Vestigial structures ----- -------------------------------------------- 17. Molecular (DNA, proteins etc…_) 18. Embryology 19. Common Ancestor Name Date Period .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Unit-V Evolution of Horse
    UNIT-V EVOLUTION OF HORSE Horses (Equus) are odd-toed hooped mammals belong- ing to the order Perissodactyla. Horse evolution is a straight line evolution and is a suitable example for orthogenesis. It started from Eocene period. The entire evolutionary sequence of horse history is recorded in North America. " Place of Origin The place of origin of horse is North America. From here, horses migrated to Europe and Asia. By the end of Pleis- tocene period, horses became extinct in the motherland (N. America). The horses now living in N. America are the de- scendants of migrants from other continents. Time of Origin The horse evolution started some 58 million years ago, m the beginning of Eocene period of Coenozoic era. The modem horse Equus originated in Pleistocene period about 2 million years ago. Evolutionary Trends The fossils of horses that lived in different periods, show that the body parts exhibited progressive changes towards a particular direction. These directional changes are called evo- lutionary trends. The evolutionary trends of horse evolution are summarized below: 1. Increase in size. 2. Increase in the length of limbs. 3. Increase in the length of the neck. 4. Increase in the length of preorbital region (face). 5. Increase in the length and size of III digit. 6. Increase in the size and complexity of brain. 7. Molarization of premolars. Olfactory bulb Hyracotherium Mesohippus Equus Fig.: Evolution of brain in horse. 8. Development of high crowns in premolars and molars. 9. Change of plantigrade gait to unguligrade gait. 10. Formation of diastema. 11. Disappearance of lateral digits.
    [Show full text]
  • Genomics and the Evolutionary History of Equids Pablo Librado, Ludovic Orlando
    Genomics and the Evolutionary History of Equids Pablo Librado, Ludovic Orlando To cite this version: Pablo Librado, Ludovic Orlando. Genomics and the Evolutionary History of Equids. Annual Review of Animal Biosciences, Annual Reviews, 2021, 9 (1), 10.1146/annurev-animal-061220-023118. hal- 03030307 HAL Id: hal-03030307 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03030307 Submitted on 30 Nov 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Annu. Rev. Anim. Biosci. 2021. 9:X–X https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-animal-061220-023118 Copyright © 2021 by Annual Reviews. All rights reserved Librado Orlando www.annualreviews.org Equid Genomics and Evolution Genomics and the Evolutionary History of Equids Pablo Librado and Ludovic Orlando Laboratoire d’Anthropobiologie Moléculaire et d’Imagerie de Synthèse, CNRS UMR 5288, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse 31000, France; email: [email protected] Keywords equid, horse, evolution, donkey, ancient DNA, population genomics Abstract The equid family contains only one single extant genus, Equus, including seven living species grouped into horses on the one hand and zebras and asses on the other. In contrast, the equine fossil record shows that an extraordinarily richer diversity existed in the past and provides multiple examples of a highly dynamic evolution punctuated by several waves of explosive radiations and extinctions, cross-continental migrations, and local adaptations.
    [Show full text]
  • Skeleton of the Oligocene (30 Million-Year-Old) Horse, Mesohippus, Is a Featured Exhibit at the New North Dakota Cowboy Hall of Fame in Medora
    Skeleton of the Oligocene (30 million-year-old) horse, Mesohippus, is a featured exhibit at the new North Dakota Cowboy Hall of Fame in Medora By John W. Hoganson Developers of the recently opened North Dakota Cowboy Hall of Fame contacted me about having a fossil exhibit in the new Hall in Medora. Of course, what would be more appropriate than an exhibit interpreting the evolution of the horse? Most people are under the false impression that horses did not inhabit North America until they were introduced by the Spaniards during the early days of conquest. But horses are indigenous to North America. Fossil remains of the earliest horse, referred to as Hyracotherium (or sometimes Eohippus), have been recovered from early Eocene (about 50 million years old) rocks in North America. In fact, they were some of the most abundant mammals that lived during that time. The fossil record of horses in North Dakota extends back to the Oligocene, about 30 million years ago, when the diminutive horse, Mesohippus roamed western North Dakota. Mesohippus was tiny, about the size of a sheep. The adults were only about 20 inches tall at the shoulder. They also had three toes on each foot compared to the modern horse Equus that has one. Mesohippus was also probably more of a browsing herbivore compared to the modern grazing horse. We have found many Mesohippus fossils in North Dakota but no complete skeletons. Consequently, the Mesohippus skeleton on exhibit at the Cowboy Hall of Fame is an exact cast replica. We have also found the remains of 50,000-year-old horses in North Dakota indicating that horses lived here during the last Ice Age.
    [Show full text]
  • Progress and Competition in Macroevolution
    Biol . Rev . (1987). 62. pp. 305-338 Printed in Great Britain PROGRESS AND COMPETITION IN MACROEVOLUTION BY MICHAEL J . BENTON Department of Geology. The Queen’s University of Belfast. Belfast. BT7 INN. Northern Ireland (Received I 3 August 1985. accepted 23 February 1987) CONTENTS I . Introduction ........ I1. Improvements in competitive ability through time ........ (I) Evolutionary progress ............ (2) Increase in morphological complexity ......... (3) The expansion of life ............. (4) Evolutionary trends ............. (5) Increased effectiveness of adaptation .......... I11 . Competition in microevolution ........... (I) Competition and natural selection .......... (2) The evolutionary effects of interspecific competition ....... (3) The effects of interspecific competition on community structure .... IV . Competition in macroevolution ........... (I) Extinction and competition ........... (2) The Red Queen .............. (3) The community paradigm ............ (4) Evolutionary rates and competitive ability ......... V . Competition and major ecological replacements ........ (I) Key adaptations and replacements ........... (2) Patterns of ecological replacement ........... (3) The evidence for double-wedge patterns (differential survival) in the fossil record . (4) The evidence that differential survival was caused by competition .... (5) Alternatives to competition ........... VI . The problems of invoking large-scale competition ........ VII . Summary ................ VIII . Acknowledgements .............. IX. References
    [Show full text]
  • Bruce J. Macfadden*
    MacFadden, B.J., 2006, Early Pliocene (latest Hemphillian) horses from the Yepómera Local 33 Fauna, Chihuahua, Mexico, in Carranza-Castañeda, Óscar, and Lindsay, E.H., eds., Advances in late Tertiary vertebrate paleontology in Mexico and the Great American Biotic Interchange: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Instituto de Geología and Centro de Geociencias, Publicación Especial 4, p. 33–43. EARLY PLIOCENE (LATEST HEMPHILLIAN) HORSES FROM THE YEPÓMERA LOCAL FAUNA, CHIHUAHUA, MEXICO Bruce J. MacFadden* ABSTRACT The latest Hemphillian (Hh4) is characterized by a distinctive equid assemblage, four spe- cies of which are widespread in North America. One of the largest collections of Hh4 equids is from Yepómera, located in Chihuahua, Mexico. Although Yepómera is actually a series of sub-localities, the equids are morphologically similar from each of these and therefore can be considered as a local faunal assemblage of four sympatric species. The distinctive dental patterns, size of the cheek teeth, and (in most cases) metapodial dimensions, make these horses readily distinguishable in the field. Yepómera equids include the monodactyl Astrohippus stockii and Dinohippus mexicanus, and tridactyl Neohipparion eurystyle and Nannippus aztecus. Yepómera is the type locality for the species A. stockii and D. mexica- nus, both described by Lance in 1950. Neohipparion eurystyle and the genus Neohipparion and A. stockii and the genus Astrohippus become extinct at the end of Hh4. Nannippus aztecus is a sister taxon of later Nannippus and D. mexicanus is the sister taxon of Equus, the equid genera that survived in North America during the Plio-Pleistocene. With hypsodonty indices between 2.6 and 3.7, all of the Yepómera horse species have high-crowned teeth, traditionally interpreted as a grazing adaptation.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution of the Horse M
    Volume 2 | Issue 2 Article 10 1940 Evolution of the Horse M. R. Benson Iowa State College Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/iowastate_veterinarian Part of the Evolution Commons, and the Large or Food Animal and Equine Medicine Commons Recommended Citation Benson, M. R. (1940) "Evolution of the Horse," Iowa State University Veterinarian: Vol. 2 : Iss. 2 , Article 10. Available at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/iowastate_veterinarian/vol2/iss2/10 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Iowa State University Veterinarian by an authorized editor of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Evolution of the Horse M. R. BENSON Class of 1940 HE phylogeny of the horse family digits (c) on both fore and rear feet. The T is perhaps the most complete record animal was more adapted for speed. of organic evolution that modern science Many representatives of this group have has discovered. This article is an at­ been discovered, ranging from 18 inches tempt to show briefly the outstanding to 24 inches, or 6 hands in height. This steps in the development of the modern animal is usually considered as a tran­ horse. sitional type between the earlier forest­ Most investigators agree that the horse dwelling animal and the later plains­ tribe originated during the Eocene epoch. inhabiting creature. Luxuriant forests grew in the warm, The Miocene era was a time of great humid climate which characterized this topographical change during which our era in North America.
    [Show full text]
  • George Gaylord Simpson Mammal Tooth Structure Horse Phylogeny Member Profile Book Review Idaho State Fossil
    Florida Fossil Horse Newsletter Volume 2 Number 3 3rd Quarter--September 1993 What's Inside? Fossil Skeletons and Mother Lodes George Gaylord Simpson Mammal Tooth Structure Horse Phylogeny Member Profile Book Review Idaho State Fossil Fossil Skeletons and Mother Lodes For those who have collected old bones and teeth from Florida, you can attest to the fact that although fossil mammals are indeed plentiful, they are usually found disarticulated; the skeletons are almost never found in tact. Localities throughout the world that do preserve complete skeletons are indeed rare and these have been called Lagerstätten, a German term roughly meaning "mother lode." Steve Gould once noted that ".Lagerstätten are rare, but their contributions to our knowledge of life's history is disproportionate to their frequency." Why is this so? For invertebrates, soft- bodied organisms may be preserved thus giving insight into various fossil groups not normally fossilized (see Book Review below). For vertebrates the same can be true. At the fabulous Eocene Messel in Germany, carbonized impressions of stomach contents of palaeotheres (close relatives of horses, see chart on page 6) indicate that they were eating grapes, and that bats were eating butterflies. For other Lagerstätten containing vertebrates, the Scientific value is in the completeness of the skeleton. These entire specimens allow paleontologists to decipher the anatomy and biology of these extinct organisms. The western U. S. has several examples of extraordinary localities with complete fossil skeletons that can be considered Lagerstätten. During our trip out west on our way to Salt Lake City, we had the opportunity to visit some of these truly extraordinary fossil sites.
    [Show full text]
  • INTRODUCTION to HORSE EVOLUTION: ANATOMICAL CHARACTERISTICS, CLASSIFICATION, and the STRATIGRAPHIC RECORD © 2008 by Deb Bennett, Ph.D
    INTRODUCTION TO HORSE EVOLUTION: ANATOMICAL CHARACTERISTICS, CLASSIFICATION, AND THE STRATIGRAPHIC RECORD © 2008 by Deb Bennett, Ph.D. The impetus for producing this educational article was a telephone conversation with a man whom I normally enjoy. He’s a cowboy, and grew up on a ranch. He’s a kind fellow who has done a good job with not only a lot of horses, but also his kids, who are likewise very fine people. He’s a Christian – a commitment that I respect – and his children were not only raised in their church, but have gone on to attend Bible College. At the same time, this fellow knows that I’m a paleontologist interested in fossil horses. In our recent conversation, at one point he suddenly burst out, “I can’t understand it! Belief in evolution is simply stupid!” I was quite taken aback at his lack of respect for my point of view, because his attitude invalidates my experience and beliefs in a way that I would never impose in return – not to mention that it goes against nearly every piece of advice that St. Paul ever gave. What could possibly cause an otherwise reasonable man to make such a statement so vehemently to someone he knows it is going to offend? Why of course — because the fellow cares about me; he wants my soul to be saved, even at the cost of his own. Why does he think my soul is in danger of damnation? Because he Dr. Deb’s favorite image of “stupid believes that the words he reads in the Bible are to be taken paleontologists” (Moe, Larry, and Curly absolutely literally – no room for metaphorical interpretations, of the Three Stooges) textual criticism, or alternative readings.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of a Single Toe in Horses: Causes, Consequences, and the Way Forward
    1 The evolution of a single toe in horses: causes, consequences, and the way forward 2 Brianna K. McHorse,1,*,†,‡ Andrew A. Biewener,*,† and Stephanie E. Pierce*,‡ 3 4 *Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA; 5 †Concord Field Station, Harvard University, Bedford, MA 01730, USA; ‡Museum of Comparative Zoology, 6 Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA 7 8 1 [email protected] 9 10 Abstract 11 Horses are a classic example of macroevolution in three major traits—large body size, tall- 12 crowned teeth (hypsodonty), and a single toe (monodactyly)—but how and why monodactyly evolved is 13 still poorly understood. Existing hypotheses usually connect digit reduction in horses to the spread and 14 eventual dominance of open-habitat grasslands, which took over from forests during the Cenozoic; digit 15 reduction has been argued to be an adaptation for speed, locomotor economy, stability, and/or 16 increased body size. In this review, we assess the evidence for these (not necessarily mutually exclusive) 17 hypotheses from a variety of related fields, including paleoecology, phylogenetic comparative methods, 18 and biomechanics. Convergent evolution of digit reduction, including in litopterns and artiodactyls, is 19 also considered. We find it unlikely that a single evolutionary driver was responsible for the evolution of 20 monodactyly, because changes in body size, foot posture, habitat, and substrate are frequently found to 21 influence one another (and to connect to broader potential drivers, such as changing climate). We 22 conclude with suggestions for future research to help untangle the complex dynamics of this remarkable 23 morphological change in extinct horses.
    [Show full text]
  • Science Assessment System Through Course Task
    Science Assessment System Through Course Task Horsing Around Grade Level: 8 Phenomena: Fossil Evidence for Evolution Science & Engineering Practices: Analyzing and Interpreting Data Constructing Explanations and Designing Solutions Crosscutting Concepts: Cause and Effect Designed and revised by Kentucky Department of Education staff in collaboration with teachers from Kentucky schools and districts. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. Preparing to implement Through Course Tasks in the Classroom What is a TCT? ● TCTs are 3-dimensional tasks specifically designed to get evidence of student competency in two dimensions, Science and Engineering Processes (SEPs) and Crosscutting Concepts (CCC), untethered from Performance Expectations (PEs)/standards. Tasks are sense-making experiences. ● Tasks are to be used formatively. The goal is for both students and teachers to understand areas of strength and improvement for the SEP(s) and CCC assessed within the task. How do I facilitate a Through Course Task (TCT)? ● TCT facilitation is a collaborative process in which teacher teams calibrate understanding of the expectations of the task and refine strategies to be used during task facilitation. Before the task: 1. Complete the TCT as a learner – compare understanding of task through the lens of success criteria (identified in the task) in order to understand expectations. Success criteria include: ▪ What is this task designed to get evidence of? ▪ What is the task asking the students to do? ▪ What might a student response look like? 2. Identify the phenomenon within the task. Consult resources to assure teacher teams have a deep understanding of associated science concepts.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolutionary Course of Life>Knowledge Acquisition> Evidence of Evolution> the Evolution of the Horse the Evolution of the Horse
    :::Index>Evolutionary Course of Life>Knowledge Acquisition> Evidence of Evolution> The Evolution of the Horse The Evolution of the Horse The evolution of the horse is always regarded as the best evidence of the evolution by a lot of evolution theorists, to explain how the evolution takes place. During 1870s, O.C. Marsh drew the evolution diagram of horse for T.H. Huxley, who was a strong supporter of Charles Darwin. Marsh drew a ladder type evolution diagram for a series of horse fossils. The Eohippus appeared before 58 million years ago was evolved into the Oligohippus 36 million years ago, which was evolved into the Merychippus 25 million years ago, and was evolved into the Pliohippus 13 million years ago. Finally, the modern horse appeared 2 million years ago. This story presents the perfect evolution result. In order to survive, the horse was evolved into single toe, tall and big body, and the teeth which were apt to chew the weeds. Soon, this evolution story was adopted by the American Museum of Natural History, and also included in the contents of the textbook at the same time. When more new fossils are excavated successively, this evolution story is considered too simple apparently. It misleads general people to think that the evolution of the horse is the most perfect evidence of the evolution, and the evolution route is purposeful, directional, and predicable. Fig1：Evolution of the Horse Bruce Macfadden redrew the evolution diagram of horse in 1988. The appearance of the Hyracotherium from 55 million years ago to the modern horse of Equus demonstrated the evolution tree.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution of Horse
    EVOLUTION OF HORSE Horses are one of the oldest forms of mammals. Evolution of horse dates back to Eocene epoch, more million than 50 million years ago. Primary centre of evolution were Great Plains of North America, from where species migrated to Europe and Asia from time to time. Horses became extinct in North America by the end of Pleistocene epoch but their offshoots in Europe and Asia flourished. Evolution of horse was triggered by a change in the climate and vegetation during lower coenozoic period, when grasslands in most parts of the world replaced forests. The main modifications in the body of horses can be outlined as follows: · 1. Increase in the size and height of the body from a small, rabbit-like animal to 6 feet tall grassland animal. 2. Gradual enlargement and better development of the third digit (median digit) and reduction of the other lateral digits. 3. Lengthening of the limbs and perfection of the hoof for fast running in open grasslands. 4. Reduction of ulna bone in the fore leg and fibula in the hind leg and strengthening of radius and tibia. 5. Change from digitigrade to unguligrade locomotion for fast running. 6. Elongation of the preorbital or facial region of the skull and migration of eyes to the top of head. 7. Modification of teeth from brachydont (low-crowned) to hypsodont (high crowned) to withstand tougher food (grass). 8. Increase in the size and complexity of the brain for superior intelligence. 9. Reduction in pectoral girdle and disappearance of the weak clavicle. 10. Body became streamlined, muscles tight, without loose fat, for long and sustained running.
    [Show full text]