DOCSLIB.ORG

Initial Environmental Examination Kazakhstan: CAREC Corridors 1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Initial Environmental Examination Kazakhstan: CAREC Corridors 1 Initial Environmental Examination Project Number: 48424-002 February 2021 Kazakhstan: CAREC Corridors 1 and 6 Connector Road (Aktobe–Makat) Reconstruction Project Prepared by the Dongsung Engineering Co., Ltd. in association with subconsultant Zhol- Sapa LLP for the Ministry of Investments and Development, Republic of Kazakhstan and the Asian Development Bank. This initial environmental examination is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Your attention is directed to the “terms of use” section on ADB’s website. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status or any territory or area. CAREC Corridors 1 and 6 Connector Road (Construction of Dossor Bypass Way) Initial Environmental Examination Initial Environmental Examination Final draft – February 2021 KAZ: CAREC Corridors 1 and 6 Construction of Dossor Bypass Way, Makat district of Atyrau region Dossor Bypass Way construction project under the CAREC Program Initial Environmental Examination Content Content .......................................................................................................... 2 Acronyms and abbreviations ....................................................................... 7 Executive summary ....................................................................................... 9 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 9 2. Project background ............................................................................................................... 9 3. Project description ................................................................................................................ 9 4. Alternatives ........................................................................................................................... 11 5. Description of the environment .................................................................................... 11 6. Identification of impact factors ..................................................................................... 13 7. Mitigation measures and management activities .................................................. 15 8. Monitoring activities ......................................................................................................... 18 9. Consultations ........................................................................................................................ 19 10 Conclusions ...................................................................................................................... 19 A. Introduction ........................................................................................... 20 A.1 Porpose of the IEE report ........................................................................................... 20 A.2 Project category .............................................................................................................. 20 A.3 Project identification and Project proponent ..................................................... 20 A.4 The nature, size, location and importance of the project ............................... 20 A.5 IEE boundaries ................................................................................................................ 21 A.6 Methodology applied .................................................................................................... 21 A.7 Report structure ............................................................................................................. 21 B. Project description ............................................................................... 23 B.1 Type and category of the project ............................................................................. 23 B.2 Project location ............................................................................................................... 23 B.3 Need for the project ...................................................................................................... 24 B.3.1 Project road ............................................................................................................ 25 B.4 Road design ...................................................................................................................... 26 B.4.1 Road standards ...................................................................................................... 26 B.4.2 Cross section .......................................................................................................... 27 B.4.3 Roadbed and Pavement ..................................................................................... 27 B.4.4 Intersection and Junction ................................................................................ 29 B.4.5 Artificial structures/Culverts ......................................................................... 31 B.4.6 Utilities/Off-site lighting ................................................................................... 31 B.4.7 Road furniture and Traffic safety .................................................................. 31 B.4.8 Rest areas and bus stops .................................................................................. 32 B.5 Work scope ...................................................................................................................... 32 B.5.1 Project phases ....................................................................................................... 32 B.5.2 Preparation works .............................................................................................. 32 B.5.3 Artificial structures/Culverts construction ............................................... 33 B.5.4 Earthworks ............................................................................................................ 33 B.5.5 Road pavement ..................................................................................................... 34 B.5.6 Road furniture ............................................................................................................ 34 B.5.7 Finishing works and rehabilitation of disturbed land ................................ 34 B.5.8 Construction equipment ........................................................................................ 34 B.5.9 Personnel ..................................................................................................................... 35 B.6 Material sources and Construction facilities ...................................................... 35 B.6.1 Borrow pits and quarries ................................................................................. 35 2 Dossor Bypass Way construction project under the CAREC Program Initial Environmental Examination B.6.2 Asphalt batching .................................................................................................. 37 B.6.3 Construction and drinking water .................................................................. 37 B.6.4 Construction camps and storage areas ....................................................... 37 C. Alternatives ........................................................................................... 38 C.1 General ............................................................................................................................... 38 C.2 "No action" alternative ................................................................................................. 38 C.3 Alternative road corridors ......................................................................................... 38 C.4 Alternative alignments ................................................................................................ 38 C.5 Alternative transport modes ..................................................................................... 39 C.6 Alternative construction camps and storage areas. ......................................... 39 D. Environmental laws, standards and regulations ............................... 40 D.1 General ............................................................................................................................... 40 D.2 Country policies and administrative framework .............................................. 40 D.2.1 Overall legal framework .................................................................................... 40 D.2.2 Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) ................................................... 40 D.2.3 Administrative framework ....................................................................................... 41 D.3 Other legislation, standards and regulations ...................................................... 44 D.3.1 Air quality ................................................................................................................ 44 D.3.2 Water quality.......................................................................................................... 47 D.3.3 Soils ............................................................................................................................ 51 D.3.4 Noise .........................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Max Petroleum Plc Annual Report & Accounts 2013 M a X Petro Le Um P Lc a N N Ua L R E P Ort & a Ccou N Ts 2
    Max Petroleum Plc Max Petroleum Plc Annual Report & Accounts 2013 Annual ReportAnnual 2013 & Accounts Having comprehensively restructured its borrowings and extended the exploration period of its Blocks A&E Licence, Max Petroleum is executing an extensive appraisal and development programme to realise the value of its post-salt assets while seeking partners to fund the completion of its potentially transformational NUR-1 well in the pre-salt. Contents 01 Highlights 40 Directors’ Remuneration 02 Joint Chairmen’s Statement Report 04 Company Overview 44 Corporate Governance 08 Key Performance Indicators Report 10 Life Cycle of a Field 46 Independent Auditors’ 11 Production Report 11 Netbacks 47 Financial Statements 12 NUR-1 Well 53 Notes to the Financial 14 Business Review Statements 26 Financial Review 92 Supplemental Disclosure 32 Corporate and Social – Oil and Gas Reserves and Responsibility Resources (unaudited) 34 Board of Directors 93 Glossary 36 Directors’ Report 96 Corporate Directory www.maxpetroleum.com — Revenue of US$93.3 million during the year ended 31 March 2013, up 86% compared to US$50.2 million HIGHLIGHTS during the year ended 31 March 2012. — Average realised selling prices increased 51% as a result of 2013 increased exports relative to domestic sales since the Zhana Makat field entered full field development, providing the Group with the right to export up to 80% of the field’s production. — Entered into a US$90 million loan agreement with SB Sberbank JSC to refinance the Group’s senior debt facility, redeem all of the Group’s convertible bonds for a US$93 million combination of cash and shares, and provide up to US$36.6 million for drilling future post-salt wells.
    [Show full text]
  • Management Board
    Corporate Governance MANAGEMENT BOARD Changes in the Management Board By Resolution of the Board of Directors of Embamunaigas JSC No. 35 dated September 5, 2018, the number of Members of the Management Board was approved as seven (7) and Salimzhan Nakpayev was elected a Member of the Management Board. Members of the Management Board as of December 31, 2018 Anuar Zhaksybekov Chairman of the Management Board of Embamunaigas JSC He started his career as an operator for oil and gas production at the Baichunas Oil and Gas Production Office (“OGPO”) of Dossorneft of Kazakhoil-Emba OJSC. After his military service, he continued working as an operator at of the oil and gas production workshop at the Karsak Field. In 1993, he graduated from the Patrice Lumumba Peoples’ Friendship University (Moscow), with a degree in Geology and Exploration of Oil and Gas Fields. After graduation he was a district geologist at the Atyrau Drilling Operations Department, a leading geologist, a deputy head of the oil recovery and well overhaul section in Makat District of Kazakhoil Emba OJSC. In 1999, he was appointed Chief Geologist at Makatneft OGPO of Kazakhoil Emba OJSC. From 2000 to 2004, he worked at Kazakhoil NC JSC as Chief Engineer of the Department of Production Management, Manager, Deputy Director of the Geology and Development Department, Director of the Geology Department. From 2004 to 2007, he was the Director the Department of Geology and Geophysics of the Geological and Technological Service, Director of the Department of Geology, Geophysics and Reservoirs of the Exploration and Production Unit of KazMunayGas NC.
    [Show full text]
  • Investor's Atlas 2006
    INVESTOR’S ATLAS 2006 Investor’s ATLAS Contents Akmola Region ............................................................................................................................................................. 4 Aktobe Region .............................................................................................................................................................. 8 Almaty Region ............................................................................................................................................................ 12 Atyrau Region .............................................................................................................................................................. 17 Eastern Kazakhstan Region............................................................................................................................................. 20 Karaganda Region ........................................................................................................................................................ 24 Kostanai Region ........................................................................................................................................................... 28 Kyzylorda Region .......................................................................................................................................................... 31 Mangistau Region ........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Summary
    EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT MunaiTas NWPC CJSC (Republic of Kazakhstan) Prepared for EUROPEAN BANK FOR RECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT Prepared by IT Russia Services, Inc. IT Russia Services, Inc. Building 2, Tryokhprudny per. 9 69, Tole Bi Ave , office 29 Moscow 123001, Russia Almaty, 480091, Kazakhstan Telephone +7 (095) 234 3177 Telephone: 107 (3272) 503 107 Facsimile +7 (095) 234 3178 Facsimile: 107 (3272) 503 107 e-mail: [email protected] e-mail: [email protected] April 2004 Executive Summary - EIA TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................3 GENERAL ..................................................................................................................................3 1.1 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT ..................................................................3 1.2 HISTORY OF THE PROJECT AND CONSIDERED ALTERNATIVES ....................3 1.3 EARLIER ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDIES ........................4 2 LEGAL AND INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK .......................................................5 3 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT INTENTIONS OF THE COMPANY.........................6 4 BASELINE ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIO-ECONOMIC CONDITIONS .............9 4.1 CLIMATIC CONDITIONS AND ATMOSPHERIC AIR QUALITY...........................9 4.2 GEOLOGICAL AND HYDROGEOLOGICAL SEETING .........................................10 4.3 HYDROLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS..................................................................12
    [Show full text]
  • Zhanat Kundakbayeva the HISTORY of KAZAKHSTAN FROM
    MINISTRY OF EDUCATION AND SCIENCE OF THE REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN THE AL-FARABI KAZAKH NATIONAL UNIVERSITY Zhanat Kundakbayeva THE HISTORY OF KAZAKHSTAN FROM EARLIEST PERIOD TO PRESENT TIME VOLUME I FROM EARLIEST PERIOD TO 1991 Almaty "Кazakh University" 2016 ББК 63.2 (3) К 88 Recommended for publication by Academic Council of the al-Faraby Kazakh National University’s History, Ethnology and Archeology Faculty and the decision of the Editorial-Publishing Council R e v i e w e r s: doctor of historical sciences, professor G.Habizhanova, doctor of historical sciences, B. Zhanguttin, doctor of historical sciences, professor K. Alimgazinov Kundakbayeva Zh. K 88 The History of Kazakhstan from the Earliest Period to Present time. Volume I: from Earliest period to 1991. Textbook. – Almaty: "Кazakh University", 2016. - &&&& p. ISBN 978-601-247-347-6 In first volume of the History of Kazakhstan for the students of non-historical specialties has been provided extensive materials on the history of present-day territory of Kazakhstan from the earliest period to 1991. Here found their reflection both recent developments on Kazakhstan history studies, primary sources evidences, teaching materials, control questions that help students understand better the course. Many of the disputable issues of the times are given in the historiographical view. The textbook is designed for students, teachers, undergraduates, and all, who are interested in the history of the Kazakhstan. ББК 63.3(5Каз)я72 ISBN 978-601-247-347-6 © Kundakbayeva Zhanat, 2016 © al-Faraby KazNU, 2016 INTRODUCTION Данное учебное пособие is intended to be a generally understandable and clearly organized outline of historical processes taken place on the present day territory of Kazakhstan since pre-historic time.
    [Show full text]
  • Kazmunaigas Exploration Production JSC
    Annual report 2015 KazMunaiGas Exploration Production JSC 1 KMG EP. Annual report 2015 CONTENTS: 3. Strategic reporting 3. About the Company 3. Company background 3. Mission and strategy 4. Financial and operational highlights 4. Ownership structure (schematic) 5. Chairman’s statement 6. Competitive advantages and industry position 7. Share listings 7. Evaluations of independent observers 9. Overview of the Kazakhstan oil & gas sector 11. Milestones of the year 14. Chief Executive’s Statement 15. Independent Directors’ Statement 19. Operational activities overview 19. Interview with Chief Executive 21. Oil Production 22. Capital expenditures 23. Supplies for export and domestic markets 24. Programme of business transformation 25. Extension of subsoil use contracts 26. Reserves 27. Exploration 29. Operating and financial review 57. Risk factors 64. Social policy 61. Social responsibility 65. Our people 67. Health, safety and environment 72. Corporate Governance 89. Consolidated Financial Statements 133. Information for Shareholders 134. Contact details 136. Reference Information 2 STRATEGIC REPORTING ABOUT THE COMPANY Company background JSC “KazMunaiGas Exploration Production” (“KMG EP” or “The Company”) was formed in March 2004 through the merger of JSC “Ozenmunaigas” (OMG) and JSC “Embamunaigas” (EMG). The Company retained its position as one of the top three oil producers in Kazakhstan last year as can be seen from the 2015 results. Last year the Company produced 12,351,000 tonnes of crude oil (251,000 bopd) including its share in production from LLP JV “Kazgermunai (KGM), CCEL and PetroKazakhstan Inc. (PKI). The volume of KMG EP’s proven and probable reserves, as of year-end 2015, audited by DeGolyer and McNaughton, increased to around 152 million tonnes (1,115 billion barrels), some 15% more than at year-end 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • Meeting Incentive Congress Ev
    MORDOVIYA CHUVASHSKAYA Naberezhnnyye Chelny Kamensk-Ural'skiy Ishim RESP. RESP. Chistopol' a lg TOMSKAYA o RESPUBLIKA Shadrinsk V RUSSIAN FEDERATIONIrtysh OBLAST' TATARSTAN TYUMENSKAYA KURGANSKAYA OMSKAYA Tomsk Simbirsk CHELYABINSKAYA OBLAST' NOVOSIBIRSKAYA PENZENSKAYA Al'met'yevsk m UL'YANOVSKAYA Kurgan i Zlatoust h s Omsk OBLAST' I Bulayevo OBLAST' OBLAST' Dimitrovgrad Chelyabinsk OBLAST' Kuybyshev Miass Mamlyutka Oktyabr'skiy Ufa Petropavlosk OBLAST' l o Kuznetsk KemerovoKEMEROVSKAYA b o Ozero Chany Tol'yatti OBLAST' T RESPUBLIKA Novosibirsk Ozero Ozero Syzran' Teke OBLAST' Troitsk Shaglyteniz Ozero Leninsk-Kuznetskiy Samara Sterlitamak Ul'ken-Karoy a Ordynskoye g Kishkenekol' l Ir o Komsomolets Sergeyevka SEVERNYY ty SAMARSKAYA BASHKORTOSTAN Borovskoy s V Fedorovka Ozero h Siletiteniz OBLAST' KAZAKHSTAN Irtyshsk O Novokuznetsk Balakovo Magnitogorsk b' Kokshetau Kustanay Uritskiy Kachiry Saratov ORENBURGSKAYA Shchuchinsk Barnaul OBLAST' Rudnyy Karatomarskoye Makinsk SARATOVSKAYA Vodokhranilishche Ozero Kushmurun Aksu Shcherbakty Lisakovsk Ozero Aleysk ol Kushmurun Karasor Tob Biysk al Semiozernoye m Pavlodar OBLAST' Ur Orenburg hi Zhitikara Is Ural'sk Akkol' Yereymentau Ekibastuz ALTAYSKIY KRAY Yesil' Atbasar i Aksay U t r U PAVLODARSKAYA r e a Gorno-Altaysk r d l i Akku a AKMOLINSKAYA OBLAST' S h Rubtsovsk O l Is OBLAST' b Ozero Orsk him ' Shalkar ASTANA Chapayevo RESPUBLIKA Zhympity Ozero Derzhavinsk Ozero Osakarovka OBLAST' Kuyukhol' Kozhakol' ALTAY Ir Shemonaikha ZAPADNYY Kiyevka tysh Aktyubinsk KUSTANAYSKAYA Semipalatinsk Shalkar
    [Show full text]
  • The Decision of the Supreme Judicial Council of the Republic Of
    The Decision of the Supreme Judicial Council of the Republic of Kazakhstan dated September 18, 2014 on the basis of the contest choice for the vacant posts of judges of local courts, announced July 17, 2014 is given a recommendation to appoint: for the post of judges of the regional and equivalent courts (6): Rakhmetova Gulzhanat Rahmetovna as a judge of the court of Astana city; Salia Vyacheslav Vasilyevich as a judge of the court of Astana city; Kerimova Khalimat Kaysarovna as a judge of Almaty city court; Diyarov Zhaydarbek Mustahimovich as a judge of Atyrau regional court; Manakaeva Kymbat Saulovna as a judge of East Kazakhstan regional court; Yegorova Jeanne Mihajlovna as a judge of Karaganda regional court; for the post of judges of the district and equivalent courts (155):Kasymova Maya Tolegenovna as a judge of Almaty district court of Astana city; Alina Aizhan Nurlanovna as a judge of Almaty district court of Astana city; Aytkazina Ayman Tleugabylovna as a judge of Almaty district court of Astana city; Amanzholov Nurbek Abdymanapovich as a judge of Almaty district court of Astana city; Hopabaev Daniar Ziyadinovich as a judge of Almaty district court of Astana city; Shualkanova Nazgul Kasimovna as a judge of Esil district court of Astana city; Eldeeva Bakit Serikovna as a judge of Esil district court of Astana city; Zholamanova Zaure Gabdessalyamovna as a judge of Esil district court of Astana city; Koshanov Ubaidullakh Kayrlovich as a judge of the district court number 2 of Almaty district of Astana city; Kulbaeva Aizhan Adilovna
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing the Competitiveness of Kazakhstan Regions: Creating an Index
    E3S Web of Conferences 159, 05002 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202015905002 BTSES-2020 Assessing the competitiveness of Kazakhstan regions: creating an index Aknur Zhidebekkyzy1,*, Rimma Sagiyeva1, Zhansaya Temerbulatova1 1Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, al-Farabi Ave. 71, 050040 Almaty, Kazakhstan Abstract. Today there is no single universally accepted method for assessing the competitiveness of the country's regions. For this reason, the research created a methodology for assessing competitiveness at the regional level for Kazakhstan. The three-factor model of Huggins for ranking the regions of Great Britain by the level of competitiveness was used as the basis, and then the model was expanded on the example of a study assessing the competitiveness of the regions of the European Union countries. All data for assessing the competitiveness of the regions of Kazakhstan were collected from the official website of the Committee on Statistics of the Ministry of National Economy of the Republic of Kazakhstan. In the article, 14 regions and 2 cities of republican significance were ranked in terms of competitiveness. As a result, the most competitive regions of Kazakhstan were Almaty city, Atyrau region and Nur-Sultan city, the worst indicator was found for the North Kazakhstan and Zhambyl regions. 1 Introduction Today, one of the highest priorities facing each state is increasing national competitiveness. National competitiveness reflects the country's ability to achieve high rates of economic growth and maintain it in the long run, control the efficient use of resources and compete in the international arena. For increasing the level of national competitiveness, it is important to understand its formation structure.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Performance Reviews Kazakhstan
    ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR EUROPE Committee on Environmental Policy ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE REVIEWS KAZAKHSTAN UNITED NATIONS New York and Geneva, 2000 Environmental Performance Reviews Series No. 8 NOTE Symbols of United Nations documents are composed of capital letters combined with figures. Mention of such a symbol indicates a reference to a United Nations document. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city of area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. UNITED NATIONS PUBLICATION Sales No. E.01.II.E.3 ISBN 92-1-116770-1 ISSN 1020-4563 iii Preface The EPR project in Kazakhstan had originally started in September 1997, but had to be interrupted for organizational reasons. A second preparatory mission therefore had to be organized and took place in October 2000. It resulted in a new structure for the report, which was adapted to the many changes in the country that had occurred in the meantime. The review team for the project was constituted following these decisions and included national experts from Finland, France, Denmark, Germany, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain and Uzbekistan, together with the ECE secretariat, UNEP and the Bilthoven Division of the WHO European Centre for Environment and Health. The costs of the participation of experts from countries in transition, as well as the travel expenses of the ECE secretariat, were covered by extrabudgetary funds that had been made available from Finland, Germany and Italy.
    [Show full text]
  • Biomass Resources of Phragmites Australis in Kazakhstan: Historical Developments, Utilization, and Prospects
    resources Review Biomass Resources of Phragmites australis in Kazakhstan: Historical Developments, Utilization, and Prospects Azim Baibagyssov 1,2,3,*, Niels Thevs 2,4, Sabir Nurtazin 1, Rainer Waldhardt 3, Volker Beckmann 2 and Ruslan Salmurzauly 1 1 Faculty of Biology and Biotechnology, Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Almaty 050010, Kazakhstan; [email protected] (S.N.); [email protected] (R.S.) 2 Faculty of Law and Economics & Institute of Botany and Landscape Ecology, University of Greifswald, 17489 Greifswald, Germany; [email protected] (N.T.); [email protected] (V.B.) 3 Division of Landscape Ecology and Landscape Planning, Institute of Landscape Ecology and Resources Management, Center for International Development and Environmental Research (ZEU), Justus Liebig University Giessen, 35390 Giessen, Germany; [email protected] 4 Central Asia Office, World Agroforestry Center, Bishkek 720001, Kyrgyzstan * Correspondence: [email protected] or [email protected] Received: 5 April 2020; Accepted: 12 June 2020; Published: 16 June 2020 Abstract: Common reed (Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin. Ex Steud.) is a highly productive wetland plant and a potentially valuable source of renewable biomass worldwide. There is more than 10 million ha of reed area globally, distributed mainly across Eurasia followed by America and Africa. The literature analysis in this paper revealed that Kazakhstan alone harbored ca. 1,600,000–3,000,000 ha of reed area, mostly distributed in the deltas and along the rivers of the country. Herein, we explored 1 the total reed biomass stock of 17 million t year− which is potentially available for harvesting in the context of wise use of wetlands.
    [Show full text]
  • The Country of the Subsoil Assets and Great Victories
    Annual Report 2019 The Country of the Subsoil Assets and Great Victories 12 The Country of the Subsoil Assets and Great Victories The Kazakhstan Oil is 120 years old: Everything started in Emba In 2019 the national oil-and-gas industry celebrated the 120-year jubilee. Absolutely this is the remarkable date for all Kazakhstan and for Embamunaigas JSC. There was in the first Emba fields that the glorious future of the Kazakhstan oil industry was built, which is today the locomotive of the country socio-economic development. he history of the Kazakhstan oil industry The oil of Karashungul is decribed as “…very light Tbegins upon in Atyrau terrain, from the first oil, / specific weight of the freshly mined oil in 2–3 gush of oil in the well № 7 of the Karashungul days makes 0.849 /, transparent and prolific in structure in 1899 (now this is the contract territory gases”. of Embamunaigas JSC in Zhylyoyskiy district in Atyrau region). There is also the information on 20 wells in Karaton, drilled in 1900, and some wells drilled in Thsi event was the result of almost two hundred 1908. Karaton is characterozed as “dome-shaped years of research in this region, starting with occurence of oil-bearing strata”. the expeditions of Prince Alexander Bekovich- Cherkasskiy, the campaigns of Ivan Buchholz In 1908 in Iskine deposit, in the well № 5, from (1671–1741), the companion of Tsar Peter the Great, the depth 228 meters, the petroleum industrialist and other researchers. Stakheyev obtained the gush of the light oil with daily flow rate near 8 tons.
    [Show full text]