GEMINI MANNED FLIGHT PROGRAM to DATE by LT

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

GEMINI MANNED FLIGHT PROGRAM to DATE by LT GEMINI MANNED FLIGHT PROGRAM TO DATE bY LT. COL. JAMES A. McDIVITT, USAF (M) Astronaut - NASA/MSC NEIL A. ARMSTRONG Astronaut - NASA/MSC SHEPARD: We'd like to talk during this part of the presentation aboui the Gemini program and tu give you a current status report on the last three flights which we have completed this year. A few days ago, a Marine colleague of mine and I were having a discussion in the control center at Houston. This Marine colleague is now a soft drink salesman but he happened to be there for the occasion of the receni eight-day mission which we completed. We were discussing a flight which occurred in May of 1961. The flight plan indicated so many seconds of control and rate command, SO many seconds of control in manual, so many seconds to look out the window, so many seconds for this, so many seconds for that, a completely chalked full flight plan. In the meantime on the control center floor discussion was going on between the ground and the pilots and they were saying "well if we don't get this thing done Tuesday we can do it Thursday." We have two gentlemen here to present the last part of this session for you. I could spend a great deal of time introducing both of them. They both have wide experience, varied backgrounds, with emphasis of course in the aero- space and aeronautical professions. They both I think are fairly well known to you so I won't take too much time in enumerating the many accomplishments which they have achieved to date. However, I will say that the first of these gentlemen, Jim McDivitt, is an Air Force pilot, test pilot trained, has combat time in KO- rea for which he has been decor- ated. He is currently serving with the NASA in Houston, was the command pilot of the four- day GT-4 mission. The second gentleman, Mr. Neil Armstrong, McDlVlTT is Navy trained, combat time in i Korea for which he has been de- corated, served as test pilot with the NACA/NASA including X-15 time and is ' currently with the NASA ;n Houston - Neil Armstrong. Jim and Neil will you come up please? 1 ARMSTRONG: Good morning gentlemen. We are pleased to again be at The Society of Experimental Test Pilots' Symposium and give our second status ' report on the Gemini program. Gemini Manned Flight Program to Date I35 The Gemini program objectives are simply stated - to extend the useful duration of man and spacecraft . in space: to develop the equipment and techniques required to perform useful tasks - specifically the rendezvous. Since our status report last year, 4 Geminis have flown - Gemini 2--Unmanned, first all systems flight. Gemini 3-First manned flight, first orbital maneuvering. Gemini 44day duration. First extra-vehicular activity. Gemini 5-8 day flight. We will discuss mission phases with reference to the individual flights - starting with the launch. McDIVITT: I'd like to start right off where we normally start space +lights and that's at the launch. Since we have to launch someplace I'd just like to show you one of the typical Dhotographs that was taken on one of our flights and this is the launch complex down at the cape and I'm sure most of you are familiar with it but I might point out some of the significant features. [Slide I.) You can see right in here the Saturn BAB and the Saturn pads, Titan Ill and its pads and we started right about there. It is quite easy to see where these things start and we want to show you how they continue. Now you know in our launches we didn't have any major problems. Each and every flight got into orbit ihe way it was supposed to. We did have a few minor problems though and they are worth mentioning because I think they sort of demonstrate our capability to handle off nominal occurrences without any catastrophic effects. As you know, Gemini 2 had one attempt that I guess we wouldn't say was completely successful but it certainly did show that we had the capability built into our booster to shut the thing down if we had any malfunctions during that very criti- cal time between engine ignition and lift off. I'm not sure you're all aware of it but there are three seconds where we are held down on the pad with bolts and during this short period of time we sense for malfunctions and our malfunc- tioning sensing system detected a hydraulic failure and shut the booster down. There were some pretty long faces but they could have been a lot longer if that thing had fallen over. Gemini 2 and Gemini 3 also had a slight discrepancy, the same kind of dis- crepancy on both flights, they had somewhat lofted trajectories which meant that the booster wasn't necessarily flying its optimum path into orbit. The reason for this was that we were flying with somewhat hotter engines than we had anti- cipated. Our thrust levels were a little higher. We reprogrammed the pitch pro- ~ f gram to take advactage of this higher thrust and on Gemini 4 and up we have , a slightly different pitch program that seems to be working just right. I On Gemini 4 you are probably well aware that the erector didn't lower which really didn't affect the flight of Gemini 4 but could be a serious problem on a rendezvous mission because you already have the Agena launched and you just don't have a teal long window to launch the Gemini in. We also had an umbilical hang-up that broke loose just after lift-off. Gemini 5, of course, we had an attempt, that after a few problems with filling the hydrogen system for the fuel cells, a TM drop-out, a power glitch, a I36 THE SOCIETY OF EXPERIMENTAL TEST PILOTS thunderstorm, and a few other things, it became apparent that that wasn't the day to try it and late in the afternoon we all decided to qo home. But the next time we tried we had a real on-time launch. As a matter of fact I don't know if you're all aware of it but we launched, I think it was .38 seconds, ahead of time and we do things in flight in elapsed time but since the elapsed ,time round- ed off the way the computers round it cff was in the 59 minutes and 59 seconds we were going to have to carry that odd second for 8 days we arbitrarily said we were 38 hundredths of a second later and rounded it off to an even number and flew with it. This time is very important. The one anomaly that we had during Gemini 5 that was of some iignificance was the pogo. Now this pogo was discussed at last year's symposium and I'm sure you all remember exactly what we raid but it's really a longitudinal oscilla- tion that is due to a first stage mechanical hydraulic-dynamic feed back and has been taken care of through a fix which put a couple of things on the booster we call horns and they are tuned so that they have the proper amount of air pressure. There was a slight procedural error in the tuning of these horns bor the second attempt at Gemini 5 so we got a slightly larger than normal pogo. May we have the next slide please. (Slide 2.) This is a slide of the comparative pogos on all the flights. You can see right here that Gemini 5 at about 130 seconds had a pogo that was about .38g peak amplitude. It didn't incapacitate the pilots by any sense of the word but of course those of you who heard them talking obviously noticed the up and down frequency of Gordo's voke. I'm not sure it was all pogo. You can see that on Gemini 4 we had one that was about .22 maximum and the other flights were considerably lower. I might add that the spec value was 259 at peak. During the launch we have B lot of things that the pilots do. First I'd like to show you what we see on the outside, what the people on the ground look at. May I have the movie please. Fortunately the booster doesn't jump around like that. Now that's a pretty view from the outside but unfortunately we don t enjoy that view from the inside because there isn't any automatic abort system on the Gemini, this is a manual function. We have certain key displays that we monitor during flight and because a lot of these things are very time critical, especially those close to the ground, we are kept pretty busy and I'd like to illustrate the kind of things that we look at during flight. (Slide 3.) First of all we have the three axes attitude ball, we have rate needles, one here for ro!I. and a pitch and yaw needle. We have tank pressure gauges that monitor the first and second stage fuel and oxidizer tanks. We have a timer that starts at lift-off. not ignition, but lift-off. We have engine lights, two stage one engine lights and one stage two engine light that indicate whether the engines are oper- ating at fu!l thrust or not, ii secondary guidance light and an attitude overrate light.
Recommended publications
  • Information Summaries
    TIROS 8 12/21/63 Delta-22 TIROS-H (A-53) 17B S National Aeronautics and TIROS 9 1/22/65 Delta-28 TIROS-I (A-54) 17A S Space Administration TIROS Operational 2TIROS 10 7/1/65 Delta-32 OT-1 17B S John F. Kennedy Space Center 2ESSA 1 2/3/66 Delta-36 OT-3 (TOS) 17A S Information Summaries 2 2 ESSA 2 2/28/66 Delta-37 OT-2 (TOS) 17B S 2ESSA 3 10/2/66 2Delta-41 TOS-A 1SLC-2E S PMS 031 (KSC) OSO (Orbiting Solar Observatories) Lunar and Planetary 2ESSA 4 1/26/67 2Delta-45 TOS-B 1SLC-2E S June 1999 OSO 1 3/7/62 Delta-8 OSO-A (S-16) 17A S 2ESSA 5 4/20/67 2Delta-48 TOS-C 1SLC-2E S OSO 2 2/3/65 Delta-29 OSO-B2 (S-17) 17B S Mission Launch Launch Payload Launch 2ESSA 6 11/10/67 2Delta-54 TOS-D 1SLC-2E S OSO 8/25/65 Delta-33 OSO-C 17B U Name Date Vehicle Code Pad Results 2ESSA 7 8/16/68 2Delta-58 TOS-E 1SLC-2E S OSO 3 3/8/67 Delta-46 OSO-E1 17A S 2ESSA 8 12/15/68 2Delta-62 TOS-F 1SLC-2E S OSO 4 10/18/67 Delta-53 OSO-D 17B S PIONEER (Lunar) 2ESSA 9 2/26/69 2Delta-67 TOS-G 17B S OSO 5 1/22/69 Delta-64 OSO-F 17B S Pioneer 1 10/11/58 Thor-Able-1 –– 17A U Major NASA 2 1 OSO 6/PAC 8/9/69 Delta-72 OSO-G/PAC 17A S Pioneer 2 11/8/58 Thor-Able-2 –– 17A U IMPROVED TIROS OPERATIONAL 2 1 OSO 7/TETR 3 9/29/71 Delta-85 OSO-H/TETR-D 17A S Pioneer 3 12/6/58 Juno II AM-11 –– 5 U 3ITOS 1/OSCAR 5 1/23/70 2Delta-76 1TIROS-M/OSCAR 1SLC-2W S 2 OSO 8 6/21/75 Delta-112 OSO-1 17B S Pioneer 4 3/3/59 Juno II AM-14 –– 5 S 3NOAA 1 12/11/70 2Delta-81 ITOS-A 1SLC-2W S Launches Pioneer 11/26/59 Atlas-Able-1 –– 14 U 3ITOS 10/21/71 2Delta-86 ITOS-B 1SLC-2E U OGO (Orbiting Geophysical
    [Show full text]
  • Gemini 4 an Astronaut Steps Into the Void
    springer.com Popular Science : Popular Science in Astronomy Shayler, David J. Gemini 4 An Astronaut Steps into the Void Details the first American spacewalk in a leap forward from the Mercury program Follows each detail of Gemini's extended duration flight, NASA's first, relying extensively on archives Continues the Pioneers in Early Spaceflight series which looks one-by-one at the Mercury and Gemini flights The flight of Gemini 4 in June 1965 was conducted barely four years after the first Americans flew in space. It was a bold step by NASA to accomplish the first American spacewalk and to extend the U.S. flight duration record to four days. This would be double the experience gained from the six Mercury missions combined. This daring mission was the first to be directed from Springer the new Mission Control at the Manned Spacecraft Center near Houston, Texas. It also revealed 1st ed. 2018, XXV, 378 p. that: Working outside the spacecraft would require further study. Developing the techniques to 1st 81 illus., 46 illus. in color. rendezvous with another object in space would not be as straightforward as NASA had hoped. edition Living in a small spacecraft for several days was a challenging but necessary step in the quest for even longer flights.Despite the risks, the gamble that astronauts Jim McDivitt and Ed White undertook paid off. Gemini 4 gave NASA the confidence to attempt an even longer flight the Printed book next time. That next mission would simulate the planned eight-day duration of an Apollo lunar Softcover voyage.
    [Show full text]
  • Jjmonl 1603.Pmd
    alactic Observer GJohn J. McCarthy Observatory Volume 9, No. 3 March 2016 GRAIL - On the Trail of the Moon's Missing Mass GRAIL (Gravity Recovery and Interior Laboratory) was a NASA scientific mission in 2011/12 to map the surface of the moon and collect data on gravitational anomalies. The image here is an artist's impres- sion of the twin satellites (Ebb and Flow) orbiting in tandem above a gravitational image of the moon. See inside, page 4 for information on gravitational anomalies (mascons) or visit http://solarsystem. nasa.gov/grail. The John J. McCarthy Observatory Galactic Observer New Milford High School Editorial Committee 388 Danbury Road Managing Editor New Milford, CT 06776 Bill Cloutier Phone/Voice: (860) 210-4117 Production & Design Phone/Fax: (860) 354-1595 www.mccarthyobservatory.org Allan Ostergren Website Development JJMO Staff Marc Polansky It is through their efforts that the McCarthy Observatory Technical Support has established itself as a significant educational and Bob Lambert recreational resource within the western Connecticut Dr. Parker Moreland community. Steve Barone Jim Johnstone Colin Campbell Carly KleinStern Dennis Cartolano Bob Lambert Mike Chiarella Roger Moore Route Jeff Chodak Parker Moreland, PhD Bill Cloutier Allan Ostergren Cecilia Dietrich Marc Polansky Dirk Feather Joe Privitera Randy Fender Monty Robson Randy Finden Don Ross John Gebauer Gene Schilling Elaine Green Katie Shusdock Tina Hartzell Paul Woodell Tom Heydenburg Amy Ziffer In This Issue "OUT THE WINDOW ON YOUR LEFT" ............................... 4 SUNRISE AND SUNSET ...................................................... 13 MARE HUMBOLDTIANIUM AND THE NORTHEAST LIMB ......... 5 JUPITER AND ITS MOONS ................................................. 13 ONE YEAR IN SPACE ....................................................... 6 TRANSIT OF JUPITER'S RED SPOT ....................................
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix a Apollo 15: “The Problem We Brought Back from the Moon”
    Appendix A Apollo 15: “The Problem We Brought Back From the Moon” Postal Covers Carried on Apollo 151 Among the best known collectables from the Apollo Era are the covers flown onboard the Apollo 15 mission in 1971, mainly because of what the mission’s Lunar Module Pilot, Jim Irwin, called “the problem we brought back from the Moon.” [1] The crew of Apollo 15 carried out one of the most complete scientific explorations of the Moon and accomplished several firsts, including the first lunar roving vehicle that was operated on the Moon to extend the range of exploration. Some 81 kilograms (180 pounds) of lunar surface samples were returned for anal- ysis, and a battery of very productive lunar surface and orbital experiments were conducted, including the first EVA in deep space. [2] Yet the Apollo 15 crew are best remembered for carrying envelopes to the Moon, and the mission is remem- bered for the “great postal caper.” [3] As noted in Chapter 7, Apollo 15 was not the first mission to carry covers. Dozens were carried on each flight from Apollo 11 onwards (see Table 1 for the complete list) and, as Apollo 15 Commander Dave Scott recalled in his book, the whole business had probably been building since Mercury, through Gemini and into Apollo. [4] People had a fascination with objects that had been carried into space, and that became more and more popular – and valuable – as the programs progressed. Right from the start of the Mercury program, each astronaut had been allowed to carry a certain number of personal items onboard, with NASA’s permission, in 1 A first version of this material was issued as Apollo 15 Cover Scandal in Orbit No.
    [Show full text]
  • Complete List of Contents
    Complete List of Contents Volume 1 Cape Canaveral and the Kennedy Space Center ......213 Publisher’s Note ......................................................... vii Chandra X-Ray Observatory ....................................223 Introduction ................................................................. ix Clementine Mission to the Moon .............................229 Preface to the Third Edition ..................................... xiii Commercial Crewed vehicles ..................................235 Contributors ............................................................. xvii Compton Gamma Ray Observatory .........................240 List of Abbreviations ................................................. xxi Cooperation in Space: U.S. and Russian .................247 Complete List of Contents .................................... xxxiii Dawn Mission ..........................................................254 Deep Impact .............................................................259 Air Traffic Control Satellites ........................................1 Deep Space Network ................................................264 Amateur Radio Satellites .............................................6 Delta Launch Vehicles .............................................271 Ames Research Center ...............................................12 Dynamics Explorers .................................................279 Ansari X Prize ............................................................19 Early-Warning Satellites ..........................................284
    [Show full text]
  • John F. Kennedy Space Center
    1 . :- /G .. .. '-1 ,.. 1- & 5 .\"T!-! LJ~,.", - -,-,c JOHN F. KENNEDY ', , .,,. ,- r-/ ;7 7,-,- ;\-, - [J'.?:? ,t:!, ;+$, , , , 1-1-,> .irI,,,,r I ! - ? /;i?(. ,7! ; ., -, -?-I ,:-. ... 8 -, , .. '',:I> !r,5, SPACE CENTER , , .>. r-, - -- Tp:c:,r, ,!- ' :u kc - - &te -- - 12rr!2L,D //I, ,Jp - - -- - - _ Lb:, N(, A St~mmaryof MAJOR NASA LAUNCHINGS Eastern Test Range Western Test Range (ETR) (WTR) October 1, 1958 - Septeniber 30, 1968 Historical and Library Services Branch John F. Kennedy Space Center "ational Aeronautics and Space Administration l<ennecly Space Center, Florida October 1968 GP 381 September 30, 1968 (Rev. January 27, 1969) SATCIEN S.I!STC)RY DCCCIivlENT University uf A!;b:,rno Rr=-?rrh Zn~tituta Histcry of Sciecce & Technc;oGy Group ERR4TA SHEET GP 381, "A Strmmary of Major MSA Zaunchings, Eastern Test Range and Western Test Range,'" dated September 30, 1968, was considered to be accurate ag of the date of publication. Hmever, additianal research has brought to light new informetion on the official mission designations for Project Apollo. Therefore, in the interest of accuracy it was believed necessary ta issue revfsed pages, rather than wait until the next complete revision of the publiatlion to correct the errors. Holders of copies of thia brochure ate requested to remove and destroy the existing pages 81, 82, 83, and 84, and insert the attached revised pages 81, 82, 83, 84, 8U, and 84B in theh place. William A. Lackyer, 3r. PROJECT MOLL0 (FLIGHTS AND TESTS) (continued) Launch NASA Name -Date Vehicle -Code Sitelpad Remarks/Results ORBITAL (lnaMANNED) 5 Jul 66 Uprated SA-203 ETR Unmanned flight to test launch vehicle Saturn 1 3 7B second (S-IVB) stage and instrment (IU) , which reflected Saturn V con- figuration.
    [Show full text]
  • String Combiners for Solar Photovoltaic Systems a Plug & Play Solution For
    Australian catalogue | April 2017 String combiners for solar photovoltaic systems A plug & play solution for photovoltaic solar installations String combiners for solar photovoltaic systems Summary String combiners ......................................................................... 2 A complete set of information, a touch away from your fingers .... 4 Exemples of photovoltaic applications Residential systems ................................................................ 8 Commercial systems ............................................................. 10 Utility scale systems .............................................................. 12 Range plus ................................................................................ 14 String combiner 1000V DC Technical features ................................................................. 16 Order code - for ungrounded or floating earthing systems ..... 17 Order code - for grounded earthing systems ......................... 18 String combiner 1500V DC Technical features ................................................................. 19 Order code ........................................................................... 20 Overall dimensions .................................................................... 21 Connection examples Single output ......................................................................... 22 Multi-output .......................................................................... 27 Products ...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • House of Representatives 1233 1994 T78.16
    1994 HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES T78.16 Libya has become involved, some of and effectively, so long as those meas- THE WHITE HOUSE, July 19, 1994. which are used by Libya to circumvent ures are appropriate, and will continue The message, together with the ac- U.S. and U.N. sanctions. Twenty-six of to report periodically to the Congress companying papers, was referred to the the institutions depicted on the chart on significant developments as re- Committee on Foreign Affairs and or- have been determined by FAC to be quired by law. dered to be printed (H. Doc. 103±282). SDNs of Libya. In addition, the chart WILLIAM J. CLINTON. identifies 19 individual Libyan bank of- THE WHITE HOUSE, July 18, 1994. T78.16 HONORING ASTRONAUTS FOR MOON ficers who have been determined to be The message, together with the ac- EXPLORATION Libyan SDNs. A copy of the chart is at- companying papers, was referred to the Mr. HALL of Texas moved to suspend tached to this report. Committee on Foreign Affairs and or- the rules and agree to the following In addition, on May 4, 1994, FAC an- dered to be printed (H. Doc. 103±281). concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. nounced the addition of five entities 261): T78.14 NOTICE REQUIREMENTÐMOTION TO and nine individuals to the list of SDNs Whereas on May 25, 1961, the President of INSTRUCT CONFEREESÐH.R. 3355 of Libya. The five entities added to the the United States established a goal for the SDN list are: Arab Turkish Bank, Mr. MCCOLLUM, pursuant to clause country to land a man on the Moon and re- Libya Insurance Company, Maghreban 1(c) of rule XXVIII, announced his in- turn him safely to Earth before the end of International Trade Company, Saving tention to instruct the managers on the decade; and Real Estate Investment Bank, and the part of the House at the conference Whereas in furtherance of that goal, 34 American astronauts flew 27 missions in Societe Maghrebine D'Investissment et with the Senate on the disagreeing votes of the two Houses on the House space; de Participation.
    [Show full text]
  • NASA History Fact Sheet
    NASA History Fact Sheet National Aeronautics and Space Administration Office of Policy and Plans NASA History Office NASA History Fact Sheet A BRIEF HISTORY OF THE NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION by Stephen J. Garber and Roger D. Launius Launching NASA "An Act to provide for research into the problems of flight within and outside the Earth's atmosphere, and for other purposes." With this simple preamble, the Congress and the President of the United States created the national Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) on October 1, 1958. NASA's birth was directly related to the pressures of national defense. After World War II, the United States and the Soviet Union were engaged in the Cold War, a broad contest over the ideologies and allegiances of the nonaligned nations. During this period, space exploration emerged as a major area of contest and became known as the space race. During the late 1940s, the Department of Defense pursued research and rocketry and upper atmospheric sciences as a means of assuring American leadership in technology. A major step forward came when President Dwight D. Eisenhower approved a plan to orbit a scientific satellite as part of the International Geophysical Year (IGY) for the period, July 1, 1957 to December 31, 1958, a cooperative effort to gather scientific data about the Earth. The Soviet Union quickly followed suit, announcing plans to orbit its own satellite. The Naval Research Laboratory's Project Vanguard was chosen on 9 September 1955 to support the IGY effort, largely because it did not interfere with high-priority ballistic missile development programs.
    [Show full text]
  • Spacewalk Database
    Purchaser First Inscribed First ID Name Purchaser Last Name Name Inscribed Last Name Biographic_Infomation 01558 Beth / Forrest Goodwin Ron & Margo Borrup In 1957 CURTISS S. (ARMY) ARMSTRONG became a member of America's Space Team. His career began with the launch of Explorer I and Apollo programs. His tireless dedication has contributed to America's future. He is truly 00022 Cheryl Ann Armstrong Curtiss S. Armstrong an American Space Pioneer. Science teacher and aerospace educator since 00023 Thomas J. Sarko Thomas J. Sarko 1975. McDonnell Douglas 25 Years, AMF Board of 00024 Lowell Grissom Lowell Grissom Directors Joined KSC in 1962 in the Director's Protocol Office. Responsible for the meticulous details for the arrival, lodging, and banquets for Kings, Queens and other VIP worldwide and their comprehensive tours of KSC with top KSC 00025 Major Jay M. Viehman Jay Merle Viehman Personnel briefing at each poi WWII US Army Air Force 1st Lt. 1943-1946. US Civil Service 1946-1972 Engineer. US Army Ballistic Missile Launch Operations. Redstone, Jupiter, Pershing. 1st Satellite (US), Mercury 1st Flight Saturn, Lunar Landing. Retired 1972 from 00026 Robert F. Heiser Robert F. Heiser NASA John F. Kennedy S Involved in Air Force, NASA, National and Commercial Space Programs since 1959. Commander Air Force Space Division 1983 to 1986. Director Kennedy Space Center - 1986 to 1 Jan 1992. Vice President, Lockheed Martin 00027 Gen. Forrest S. McCartney Forrest S. McCartney Launch Operations. Involved in the operations of the first 41 manned missions. Twenty years with NASA. Ten years 00028 Paul C. Donnelly Paul C.
    [Show full text]
  • Project Gemini: America in Space Series Ebook
    PROJECT GEMINI: AMERICA IN SPACE SERIES PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Eugen Reichl | 144 pages | 28 Mar 2016 | Schiffer Publishing Ltd | 9780764350702 | English | Atglen, United States Project Gemini: America in Space Series PDF Book A-4G Skyhawk. This photo was taken of the two pilots in the spacecraft simulator at the McDonnell plant in St. This program was the turning point in the space race with the USSR; from then on the Americans took the lead. Flights lasting two weeks, into the Van Allen Belt, the first extravehicular activities, rendezvous maneuvers and docking with other spacecraft—all of this was achieved by Gemini, paving the way for the more demanding moon landing program. The channel of the intracoastal waterway can be seen near the bottom center of the image. See all 5 - All listings for this product. McDonnell later sought to extend the Gemini program by proposing a derivative which could be used to fly a cislunar mission and even achieve a crewed lunar landing earlier and at less cost than Apollo, but these proposals were rejected by NASA. Hamilton Crawford's It was not all success, however. President Lyndon B. Like almost every significant undertaking, Project Gemini also had its dramas and tragedies. These were followed by ten flights with crews in and Any condition Any condition. First space rendezvous accomplished, station- keeping for over five hours at distances from 1 to feet 0. This mission was flown by the backup crew. Gemini was the first astronaut-carrying spacecraft to include an onboard computer, the Gemini Guidance Computer , to facilitate management and control of mission maneuvers.
    [Show full text]
  • NASA Symbols and Flags in the US Manned Space Program
    SEPTEMBER-DECEMBER 2007 #230 THE FLAG BULLETIN THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF VEXILLOLOGY www.flagresearchcenter.com 225 [email protected] THE FLAG BULLETIN THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF VEXILLOLOGY September-December 2007 No. 230 Volume XLVI, Nos. 5-6 FLAGS IN SPACE: NASA SYMBOLS AND FLAGS IN THE U.S. MANNED SPACE PROGRAM Anne M. Platoff 143-221 COVER PICTURES 222 INDEX 223-224 The Flag Bulletin is officially recognized by the International Federation of Vexillological Associations for the publication of scholarly articles relating to vexillology Art layout for this issue by Terri Malgieri Funding for addition of color pages and binding of this combined issue was provided by the University of California, Santa Barbara Library and by the University of California Research Grants for Librarians Program. The Flag Bulletin at the time of publication was behind schedule and therefore the references in the article to dates after December 2007 reflect events that occurred after that date but before the publication of this issue in 2010. © Copyright 2007 by the Flag Research Center; all rights reserved. Postmaster: Send address changes to THE FLAG BULLETIN, 3 Edgehill Rd., Winchester, Mass. 01890 U.S.A. THE FLAG BULLETIN (ISSN 0015-3370) is published bimonthly; the annual subscription rate is $68.00. Periodicals postage paid at Winchester. www.flagresearchcenter.com www.flagresearchcenter.com 141 [email protected] ANNE M. PLATOFF (Annie) is a librarian at the University of Cali- fornia, Santa Barbara Library. From 1989-1996 she was a contrac- tor employee at NASA’s Johnson Space Center. During this time she worked as an Information Specialist for the New Initiatives Of- fice and the Exploration Programs Office, and later as a Policy Ana- lyst for the Public Affairs Office.
    [Show full text]