DOCSLIB.ORG

Chron 0811.Qxd

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Chron 0811.Qxd BUSINESS to www.bayareahouston.com BAHEP extends its sincere appreciation for the continued support of the Houston Chronicle through this monthly supplement. BUSINESS August 2011 IN BRIEF Hofmeister pulls no punches Great speakers enhance BAHEP membership when discussing America’s energy crisis The Bay Area Houston Eco- nomic Partnership has success- fully served the economic devel- At an August luncheon, John Hofmeister also believes that lion barrels per day, and no one opment needs of the region for Hofmeister, former CEO of America is “facing the prospect in knows where the extra produc- 35 years. It has worked with indi- Shell Oil Company, faced a room- just a few years or any day in cer- tion is going to come from.” viduals, businesses, member cities ful of members of the Bay Area tain parts of the country” to in- and elected officials from Nassau Houston Economic Partnership termittent blackouts, which would Opportunity exists Bay to the Netherlands to facili- and kept them spellbound as he take us into a new age in our his- In the 1970s and 1980s, accord- tate growth in Bay Area Houston. expertly delivered a speech about tory, the age of the energy abyss. ing to Hofmeister, the United BAHEP frequently hosts in- America’s energy crisis. Shell’s former CEO also does States produced around 10 mil- dustry and community leaders Hofmeister, never reticent not hesitate to declare that the lion barrels per day of crude oil who present current, accurate in- about making his opinions biggest threat to this nation is the compared to the 7 million barrels formation relevant to its mem- known, has founded Citizens for current dysfunction of the feder- being produced now. He firmly bers. Often this is accomplished Affordable Energy. He stated, al government, seconded only by believes if crude oil production through BAHEP’s general mem- “My mission, and the reason I the dysfunction of many state were to return to that level, three bership meetings. Guest speakers started Citizens for Affordable governments. He stated, “We million new American jobs at oil at the meetings have included Energy, is to make sure every per- have tolerated the evolution of a industry pay and benefit rates John Hofmeister, former CEO of son in America, by reaching out, government structure, a govern- would be created. Shell Oil Company, who captivat- by social networking, knows what ment process that is dysfunction- This would also produce an es- ed his audience as you can read in we face in the future of our ener- al, broken, and unfixable in its timated $30 billion per year in the adjoining article. The Honor- gy supply, our energy infrastruc- current form. Thirteen Cabinet new revenues from oil royalties. able Annise Parker, mayor of ture, our environmental threats, officers, 26 committee chairs and The tax take on three million new Houston; Port of Houston Au- and the potential of what’s possi- ranking members of Congress, jobs would also be significant, thority Executive Director Alec ble without a Republican slant, and hundreds of federal judges and the corporations would be Dreyer; and Drayton McLane, Jr., without a Democratic slant, be- create chaos when determining paying more taxes due to their in- former CEO of the Astros, have cause I don’t trust either or we an energy policy, and chaos does- crease in revenue. all informed, and often delighted, wouldn’t be where we are.” n’t get things done.” Hofmeister declared, “The en- BAHEP’s members. ergy system needs of the 21st General membership meetings Where are we? Reality of where we’re going century would create investment are just one of numerous ways The United States needs 20 million Without major changes in Amer- in the amount of trillions of dol- that the organization serves its barrels of oil every day. It also uses ica’s energy policy, Hofmeister lars of private capital and enough members. To find out more, con- 60 billion cubic feet of natural gas believes that America is headed employment that the economy of Following his Aug. 4 speech, John Hofmeister autographed tact Harriet Lukee, membership daily and 1,200 coal cars every hour for gas lines within three years, this country would experience a copies of his book, “Why We Hate the Oil Companies -- director, at 832.536.3255. of every day. That doesn’t include along with brownouts and black- growth surge unlike anything Straight Talk From an Energy Insider.” BAHEP’s membership energy produced from 104 nuclear outs, because power plants are we’ve experienced since before luncheon was held at the Hilton Houston NASA Clear Lake. plants. Hofmeister warned, “We not being built. He said, “The re- the 1970s.” SATOP provides help are neither keeping up with the ality is the Gulf of Mexico is all for small businesses maintenance and the sustenance of but shut down for deepwater In conclusion can operate outside of Congress our country free. That, to me, is a the 20th century system nor are we drilling, and it’s not coming back. and political partisanship, to cre- pretty good objective for the 21st The Space Alliance Technology Eight presidents and 19 con- replacing it with a 21st century en- The consequence of this is one ate a 21st century energy system. century.” (For more information, Outreach Program is administered gresses, Hofmeister declared, ergy system. We are getting closer million less barrels per day of do- Hofmeister concluded, “It is my visit www.citizensforafford- by the Bay Area Houston Eco- have promised America energy by the year, and this decade is the mestic production by 2015. belief that we can pull ourselves ableenergy.org. For an audio ver- nomic Partnership. It is a NASA security, but energy security is de- tipping point, to the 20th century Worldwide, the demand for oil in up by our socks and do what sion of Hofmeister’s speech, see and State of Texas funded initiative creasing by the year. He supports energy system not supporting our four years will increase from 86 Americans do - go to work, enjoy www.bayareahouston.com/news- designed to transfer the knowledge establishment of an independent liquid fuel requirements.” million barrels per day to 96 mil- life, raise our families, and keep room/press-releases.) and technology of the U.S. Space regulatory commission, which Program to small businesses, at no charge to them, to solve technical challenges they are unable to solve themselves. Any type of small busi- NASA's Executive on Loan BAHEP welcomes Jamail & Smith ness is encouraged to submit a Jamail & Smith Construction has company’s services include new- numerous awards from clients technical challenge to SATOP. If to BAHEP brings extensive become the newest member of the build construction, renovations and leading industry organiza- SATOP is able to assist, the small Bay Area Houston Economic Part- and repair, green building appli- tions for outstanding safety per- business is provided with up to 40 background to position nership. The company headquar- cations, program management, formance and best practices in- hours of FREE technical assis- ters at 16875 Diana Lane in the Bay design-build, and Job Order Con- cluding: Associated Builders & tance from a scientist or engineer in Linda Ham, NASA’s first fe- noted accomplishments within Area and has additional Texas of- tracting. Jamail & Smith Con- Contractors, Inc. Gold Medal of the Space Program. male flight director, has been se- NASA make her the ideal person lected as Johnson Space Center’s to take the BayTech consortium fices in Austin, Dallas, Houston, struction’s JOC client roster in- Safety Excellence in 2005 and Executive on Loan to the Bay from conception to reality and Killeen, and San Antonio. cludes rural and urban school dis- STEP Platinum Achievement Area Houston Economic Part- beyond.” Bob Mitchell, BAHEP presi- tricts, purchasing cooperatives Award for Safety Excellence nership. In this position, she will Ham holds a Master of Science dent, stated, “Over the past few from 2006 - 2011. work with BAHEP as the organi- in Astronautical Engineering from years, Jamail & Smith Construc- Kristi Kelly-Lowery, direc- zation establishes and leads tion has experienced outstanding tor of Business Development, the Bay Area Houston Ad- growth while maintaining its ex- represents Jamail & Smith Con- vanced Technology Con- cellent reputation. We look for- struction within BAHEP. She sortium, BayTech. ward to partnering with them as commented, “We are very excit- The BayTech consor- we work together to further eco- ed about renewing our relation- tium will create mutually nomic growth in the region.” and public institutions, as well as ship with BAHEP and its mem- beneficial partnerships Jim Jamail, president, founded county, state, and federal govern- bers. We look forward to work- among NASA JSC, other Jamail Construction in 1982. It ment entities. Other clients in- ing with them in advancing our federal agencies, business- underwent a name change in Jan- clude nursing homes, rehabilita- community and contributing es, universities, and the uary 2007 when Greg Smith, P.E., tion centers and numerous pri- further to this outstanding or- State of Texas. BayTech’s who joined the company in 1998, vate-sector clients. ganization.” became a partner. He currently Jamail & Smith Construction For additional information, vis- SATOP publishes 1-2-3 SATOP, goals include development serves as executive vice president. has a long history of a commit- it www.jamailsmith.com or call a quarterly newsletter. Each of partnerships that lever- Employing 180 people, the ment to safety, which has led to 832.628.4181. newsletter focuses on SATOP age and utilize JSC’s tech- Linda Ham events, success stories, economic nical capabilities, core NASA Executive on Loan development organizations, and competencies, expertise, Alliance Partners.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Space Reporter's Handbook Mission Supplement
    CBS News Space Reporter's Handbook - Mission Supplement Page 1 The CBS News Space Reporter's Handbook Mission Supplement Shuttle Mission STS-125: Hubble Space Telescope Servicing Mission 4 Written and Produced By William G. Harwood CBS News Space Analyst [email protected] CBS News 5/10/09 Page 2 CBS News Space Reporter's Handbook - Mission Supplement Revision History Editor's Note Mission-specific sections of the Space Reporter's Handbook are posted as flight data becomes available. Readers should check the CBS News "Space Place" web site in the weeks before a launch to download the latest edition: http://www.cbsnews.com/network/news/space/current.html DATE RELEASE NOTES 08/03/08 Initial STS-125 release 04/11/09 Updating to reflect may 12 launch; revised flight plan 04/15/09 Adding EVA breakdown; walkthrough 04/23/09 Updating for 5/11 launch target date 04/30/09 Adding STS-400 details from FRR briefing 05/04/09 Adding trajectory data; abort boundaries; STS-400 launch windows Introduction This document is an outgrowth of my original UPI Space Reporter's Handbook, prepared prior to STS-26 for United Press International and updated for several flights thereafter due to popular demand. The current version is prepared for CBS News. As with the original, the goal here is to provide useful information on U.S. and Russian space flights so reporters and producers will not be forced to rely on government or industry public affairs officers at times when it might be difficult to get timely responses. All of these data are available elsewhere, of course, but not necessarily in one place.
    [Show full text]
  • Space Shuttle Discovery Launched on the First Post-Columbia Mission on July 26, 2005, 905 Days After the Accident
    AFTERWORD Space shuttle Discovery launched on the first post-Columbia mission on July 26, 2005, 905 days after the accident. Coincidentally, the launch took place at 10:39 A.M. EDT, the same time as Columbia’s launch on its final flight. STS-114 was the culmination of a $1.4 billion effort to improve the shuttle, most notably the External Tank. The bipod foam was replaced with an electrical heater to prevent ice from forming. Marshall Space- flight Center External Tank manager Sandy Coleman promised that no foam larger than a marshmallow would fall off of the improved tank. In the 147-page press kit’s description of all of the improvements to the shuttle, KSC’s acceptance of the industry standard definition for FOD (Foreign Object Debris) is presented as a positive. In a spin doctor- ing attempt it’s described how new FOD procedures improve safety, and ignores that FOD rules existed until two years before the Columbia acci- dent when the rules were reduced in a conscious move to make more bonus money for the contractor. Over 100 tracking cameras viewed Discovery’s launch. The E208 camera in Cocoa Beach, the one that had been “soft focused” on STS- 107, was replaced with a state-of-the-art setup. Cameras were also mounted on Discovery’s External Tank and Solid Rocket Boosters, and The bipod fitting on STS-114, on the right, shows the most significant external change— there is no longer any foam on the bipod fitting. 428 AFTERWORD 429 two aircraft with high-definition cameras offered the unique perspective of a shuttle flying toward the viewer.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the PDF Case Study
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration Academy of Program/Project & Engineering Leadership Columbia's Last Mission Columbia’s Last Mission The Space Shuttle Columbia thundered skyward at 10:39 AM on January 16, 2003 from Kennedy Space Center. Little more than a minute later, a chunk of insulating foam tore away from the external fuel tank and splintered against Columbia’s left wing. The incident did not disrupt Columbia’s planned path to orbit; indeed, nobody on the ground or in the orbiter even noticed it. It would be another day before routine reviews of launch photos revealed the foam strike and triggered discussions within NASA about what, if anything should be done about it.1 Background Established in January 1972, the Shuttle Program was charged with developing and deploying a fleet of reusable, cost-efficient vehicles that would make routine human space flight possible. The first Shuttle mission, STS-1, was flown by Columbia on April 12, 1981. A vast team of workers – some 17,500 NASA employees and contractors spread across the country – were supporting Columbia’s latest mission, STS-107, the Shuttle Program’s 113th mission. The Shuttle Program workforce operated facilities hosted by various NASA Centers. The Space Shuttle Program Office at the Johnson Space Center was responsible for all aspects of developing, supporting, and flying the Space Shuttle. The prime contractor for space flight operations was United Space Alliance (USA), a corporate partnership formed in 1995 between Lockheed Martin and Rockwell (later Boeing) exclusively to serve the Shuttle program. USA employees comprised the bulk of the contractor workforce at Johnson Space Center.
    [Show full text]
  • Columbia's Last Flight | Langewiesche Page 1 of 31
    The Atlantic | November 2003 | Columbia's Last Flight | Langewiesche Page 1 of 31 Print this Page Close Window The Atlantic Monthly | November 2003 Columbia's Last Flight The inside story of the investigation—and the catastrophe it laid bare BY WILLIAM LANGEWIESCHE ..... pace flight is known to be a risky business, but during the minutes before dawn last February 1, as the doomed shuttle Columbia began to descend into the upper atmosphere over the Pacific Ocean, only a handful of people—a few engineers deep inside of NASA—worried that the vehicle and its seven souls might actually come to grief. It was the responsibility of NASA's managers to hear those suspicions, and from top to bottom they failed. After the fact, that's easy to see. But in fairness to those whose reputations have now been sacrificed, seventeen years and eighty- nine shuttle flights had passed since the Challenger explosion, and within the agency a new generation had risen that was smart, perhaps, but also unwise—confined by NASA's walls and routines, and vulnerable to the self-satisfaction that inevitably had set in. Moreover, this mission was a yawn—a low-priority "science" flight forced onto NASA by Congress and postponed for two years because of a more pressing schedule of construction deliveries to the International Space Station. The truth is, it had finally been launched as much to clear the books as to add to human knowledge, and it had gone nowhere except into low Earth orbit, around the globe every ninety minutes for sixteen days, carrying the first Israeli
    [Show full text]
  • Apollo Mission Control the Making of a National Historic Landmark
    Apollo Mission Control The Making of a National Historic Landmark More information about this series at http://www.springer.com/series/4097 Other Springer-Praxis books by Manfred “Dutch” von Ehrenfried Stratonauts: Pioneers Venturing into the Stratosphere, 2014 ISBN:978-3-319-02900-9 The Birth of NASA: The Work of the Space Task Group, America’s First True Space Pioneers, 2016 ISBN:978-3-319-28426-2 Exploring the Martian Moons: A Human Mission to Deimos and Phobos, 2017 ISBN:978-3-319-52699-7 Manfred “Dutch” von Ehrenfried Apollo Mission Control The Making of a National Historic Landmark Manfred “Dutch” von Ehrenfried Leander, Texas, USA SPRINGER-PRAXIS BOOKS IN SPACE EXPLORATION Springer Praxis Books ISBN 978-3-319-76683-6 ISBN 978-3-319-76684-3 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76684-3 Library of Congress Control Number: 2018939417 © Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use.
    [Show full text]
  • PRESS ROUNDTABLE STS-107 MISSION MANAGEMENT July 22, 2003
    July 23, 2003 PRESS ROUNDTABLE STS-107 MISSION MANAGEMENT July 22, 2003 PRESENT: KYLE HERRING, JSC PAO, LINDA HAM, Chairperson, STS-107, Mission Management Team (MMT) PHIL ENGELAUF, Mission Operations Directorate LeROY CAIN, STS-107 Ascent/Entry Flight Director 3 p.m.EST Tuesday, July 22, 2003 [TRANSCRIPT PREPARED FROM TELEPHONIC RECORDING.] - 1 - 1 P R O C E E D I N G S 2 3 MR. HERRING: I will introduce the panel. Some of you have already been 4 introduced, but since we are on the air and there is a lot of people listening, I'm 5 sure, let me run down to my left here. 6 7 It is Linda Ham who is on STS-107, served as a Space Shuttle program 8 manager for Integration. 9 10 Phil Engelauf, to her left, is the Mission Operations Directorate representative for 11 STS-107. He is also a veteran flight director. 12 13 A lot of you know LeRoy Cain. He served as the STS-107 Ascent/Entry flight 14 director. 15 16 All three, I think, have some opening comments, and then I guess before we 17 start, just for the record, Tracy, why don't we start at your end, and you guys just 18 quickly go around, so that they all know who you are, also. 19 20 QUESTIONER: Tracy [inaudible], USA Today. 21 22 QUESTIONER: Tod Halberson [ph], Florida Today. 23 24 QUESTIONER: Eric Pianen [ph], Washington Post. 25 26 QUESTIONER: Marsha [inaudible], Associated Press. 27 28 QUESTIONER: Bill Harwood, CBS. 29 30 QUESTIONER: Mike [inaudible] Centinnel.
    [Show full text]
  • + 1992 News Releases (4.8 Mb PDF File)
    1992 JSC NEWS RELEASES 92-001 STS-42 Preflight Background Briefings Set 1/07/92 92-002 Fourth Group of Prospective Astronauts to Arrive at JSC 1/07/92 92-003 Flight Control of STS-42 1/09/92 92-004 STS-42 Postflight Briefing to be Held 2/11 1/31/92 92-005 Shuttle Columbia to Stop Overnight in Houston 2/04/92 92-006 NTE: JSC Space Station Facilities to be Dedicated 2/06/92 92-007 Space Shuttle Mission STS-45 Briefing Set 2/10/92 92-008 Aaron Cohen Statement 2/20/92 92-009 Crew Assignments Announced for Future Shuffle 2/21/92 Missions 92-010 Flight Control of STS-45 3/04/92 92-011 Bioreactor Team Earns NASA Inventor of the Year 3/06/92 Honors 92-012 Scientists Gather for Lunar/Planetary Science Conference 3/09/92 92-013 NTE: Buoyant Overdesigned ACRV Testbed (BOAT) 3/11/92 to be Christened at JSC 92-014 Astronaut Brand Joins Aero-Space Plane Program 3/12/92 92-015 Meteorites' Water Provide Clue to Red Planet's Past 3/14/92 92-016 Space Shuttle Crew Assignments Announced 3/16/92 92-017 Space Shuttle STS-49 Preflight Briefings Set 3/30/92 92-018 1992 Astronaut Candidates Selected 3/31/92 92-019 STS-45 Postflight Crew Press Conference Scheduled 4/08/92 April13 92-020 Flight Control of STS-49 4/24/92 92-021 NTE: Senator Phil Gramm Press Conference 4/30/92 92-022 NASA Studies Team Performance in 30-Day Undersea 5/07/92 Mission 92-023 NTE: NASA Administrator Daniel Goldin in Houston 5/09/92 92-024 "HISD Space Day" to be held at NASA JSC 5/14/92 92-025 Media Advisory 5/12/92 92-026 STS-50 USML Briefing Set 5/19/92 92-027 Astronaut Melnick to Retire
    [Show full text]
  • Nasa Johnson Space Center Oral History Project Edited Oral History Transcript
    NASA JOHNSON SPACE CENTER ORAL HISTORY PROJECT EDITED ORAL HISTORY TRANSCRIPT CHRISTOPHER C. KRAFT, JR. INTERVIEWED BY REBECCA WRIGHT HOUSTON, TEXAS – AUGUST 6, 2012 WRIGHT: Today is August 6th, 2012. This oral history interview is being conducted in Houston, Texas with Dr. Christopher Kraft, former Center Director of the Johnson Space Center. Interviewer is Rebecca Wright, assisted by Jennifer Ross-Nazzal. KRAFT: The [Space] Shuttles were made in those Management Council meetings. What brings me to that is that in the latter part before we flew the Shuttle, there were X number of Criticality 1 problems. Well, I shouldn’t call them problems, but Criticality 1 means that if you had a failure of that particular function or system or part, you would lose the spacecraft. During the latter phases before we flew we reviewed in detail at the Management Council every one of those. I mean in dirty detail, total detail. I would like to ask, “Where is that recorded?” At that point in time, of the Shuttle accidents, [Space Shuttle] Challenger [STS-51L] and Columbia [STS-107], nobody ever talked about that in anything I’ve ever read since then. All these reviews, all the oversight that was made of the program, nobody ever talked about the fact that those things were reviewed. That’s number one, but number two is I don’t believe anybody remained in the top management of the program that knew what those decisions were. That’s very very dangerous. The Space Shuttle was like any other space vehicle. Weight, performance—that is power, liftoff capability—always a major issue, always will be in any space vehicle.
    [Show full text]
  • NASA's Crisis Communication Efforts As a Public Sector Organization
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Master's Theses Graduate School 2008 It's not rocket science: NASA's crisis communication efforts as a public sector organization following the Columbia shuttle disaster Emily Ann Schult Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses Part of the Mass Communication Commons Recommended Citation Schult, Emily Ann, "It's not rocket science: NASA's crisis communication efforts as a public sector organization following the Columbia shuttle disaster" (2008). LSU Master's Theses. 3998. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses/3998 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Master's Theses by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. IT’S NOT ROCKET SCIENCE: NASA’S CRISIS COMMUNICATION EFFORTS AS A PUBLIC SECTOR ORGANIZATION FOLLOWING THE COLUMBIA SHUTTLE DISASTER A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Master of Mass Communication in The Manship School of Mass Communication by Emily Ann Schult B.A., Louisiana State University, 2006 August 2008 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The completion of this thesis would have been impossible without the help of many people. First I must thank Dr. Jinx Broussard for her dedication to this project. Your belief in my abilities and your words of wisdom will stay with me long after my graduation from the Manship School.
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Response to Changing Fortune: Sean O'keefe As NASA
    O ctobe R 2 0 0 5 Executive Response to Changing Fortune: Sean O’Keefe as NASA Administrator NASA/KSC W. Henry Lambright Professor of Public Administration and Political Science, and Director, Science and Technology Policy Program The Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs Syracuse University Transformation of Organizations Series Space Shuttle Discovery takeoff, July 26, 2005 TRansFORMATIon OF ORGanIZATIons SERIES Executive Response to Changing Fortune: Sean O’Keefe as NASA Administrator W. Henry Lambright Professor of Public Administration and Political Science, and Director, Science and Technology Policy Program The Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs Syracuse University October 2005 T ABL E O F C O N TE N T S Foreword ..............................................................................................5 Executive Summary ..............................................................................6 The Executive Challenge: Responding to Changing Fortune .................9 The Executive as Consolidator and Incremental Innovator: O’Keefe in 2002 .................................................................................13 Introduction .................................................................................13 O’Keefe: Background ...................................................................13 The International Space Station (ISS) ............................................14 Appointment to NASA .................................................................15 A Year of Quiet Change
    [Show full text]
  • History As Cause: Columbia and Challenger
    COLUMBIA ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION BOARD CHAPTER 8 History As Cause: Columbia and Challenger The Board began its investigation with two central ques- engineersʼ decision-making, the three worked together. Each tions about NASA decisions. Why did NASA continue to fly is a critical link in the causal chain. with known foam debris problems in the years preceding the Columbia launch, and why did NASA managers conclude This chapter shows that both accidents were “failures of that the foam debris strike 81.9 seconds into Columbiaʼs foresight” in which history played a prominent role.1 First, flight was not a threat to the safety of the mission, despite the history of engineering decisions on foam and O-ring the concerns of their engineers? incidents had identical trajectories that “normalized” these anomalies, so that flying with these flaws became routine 8.1 ECHOES OF CHALLENGER and acceptable. Second, NASA history had an effect. In re- sponse to White House and Congressional mandates, NASA As the investigation progressed, Board member Dr. Sally leaders took actions that created systemic organizational Ride, who also served on the Rogers Commission, observed flaws at the time of Challenger that were also present for that there were “echoes” of Challenger in Columbia. Ironi- Columbia. The final section compares the two critical deci- cally, the Rogers Commission investigation into Challenger sion sequences immediately before the loss of both Orbit- started with two remarkably similar central questions: Why ers – the pre-launch teleconference for Challenger and the did NASA continue to fly with known O-ring erosion prob- post-launch foam strike discussions for Columbia.
    [Show full text]
  • Seven Axioms of Good Engineering: Development of a Case Study-Based Course for NASA
    Paper ID #16821 Seven Axioms of Good Engineering: Development of a Case Study-Based Course for NASA Dr. Anthony F. Luscher, Ohio State University Dr. Anthony Luscher has taught engineering design for 23 years at the freshman, sophomore and senior levels. He leads the capstone design effort at Ohio State and is interested in innovative methods of teaching design. At Ohio State he conducts research in innovative fastening strategies and methods, assembly ergonomics and structural optimization. Mr. Roger Forsgren, NASA Headquarters Roger Forsgren is the director of NASA’s Academy of Program/Project and Engineering Leadership (AP- PEL). The Academy’s training curriculum enables NASA’s technical workforce to develop NASA-specific expertise and capability in program/project management, engineering, and systems engineering. It is in- tended to supplement an individual’s academic and professional work experience. Mr. Forsgren holds two Bachelors degrees, one in history from Georgetown University and one in engineering from Cleve- land State University. He also obtained a Masters Degree in Engineering from Cleveland State University. He lives in Virginia with his wife Florence; they have four sons. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Seven Axioms of Good Engineering: Development of A Case Study-Based Course for NASA Abstract This paper describes the development of a custom course tailored to the mission and program needs of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). NASA’s Academy of Program/Project & Engineering Leadership (APPEL) was looking for a novel way of educating its engineering and management workforce about engineering design by investigating design successes and failures both internal and external to NASA.
    [Show full text]