DOCSLIB.ORG

List of Seeds and Spores Available in 2017

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

ebgconsortiumindexseminum2013 D E L E C T U S S E M I N U M List of seeds and spores available in 2017 Address: Kumpula Botanic Garden P.O. Box 44 (Jyrängöntie 2) FI-00014 UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI FINLAND email: [email protected] www.luomus.fi seminumsystem2017 seminumwild2017 ebgconsortiumindexseminum2013 COVER PICTURE: The south facade of the main greenhouses of University of Helsinki Botanic Garden in Kaisaniemi. The greenhouses were designed by Gustaf Nyström and built in 1889 and in 1896. They were thoroughly refurbished in 1996–1998. NEWS FROM THE FINNISH MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY The year 2016 saw a number of innovations in the Botany unit of the Finnish Museum of Natural History: bryophyte and lichen gardens, along with newly built sensory and rock gardens, were introduced. In addition, work related to international seed exchange has undergone a thorough renewal: all seed lots collected from Finland are stored long term in our seed bank. This allows us to serve our partner institutions with increasingly diverse and viable seed accessions. The year 2017 focuses on mass digitization of herbarium specimens, and systematic garden reorganized according to APG III classification will be inaugurated in June 2017. seminumsystem2017 seminumwild2017 ebgconsortiumindexseminum2013 DELECTUS SEMINUM List of seeds and spores available at the Botanic Gardens of the University of Helsinki in 2017 Edited by: Mari Miranto, Mikko Piirainen & Paula Havas-Matilainen Helsinki February 2017 Publisher: Botany Unit Finnish Museum of Natural History – LUOMUS University of Helsinki Address: Kumpula Botanic Garden P.O.Box 44 (Jyrängöntie 2) FI-00014 UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI FINLAND Email: [email protected] http://www.luomus.fi/english/botany/ seminumsystem2017 seminumwild2017 ebgconsortiumindexseminum2013 CONDITIONS FOR EXCHANGE OF PLANT MATERIAL The Botanic Gardens of the Botany Unit, Finnish Museum of Natural History, University of Helsinki (subsequently referred to as ‘the Garden’) recognizes the legal and moral obligations imposed on its work by the Nagoya Protocol, the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES), and other agreements and laws relating to the protection and sustainable use of biodiversity. The Garden shall do its utmost to ensure its activities in no way violate the spirit or letter of such regulations, and it expects all its partners to comply with the same standards. Therefore, the Garden supplies whole plants, seeds, spores, other propagules, cuttings, or other plant material (= material) only under the conditions that: 1. The material is used solely for the common good in areas of scientific research, species conservation, and education, and not for commercial purposes. 2. Eventual commercialization of the material is separately agreed upon with the country of origin of the material, following the spirit of the Nagoya Protocol and in compliance with the laws of that country. 3. Information on the material supplied with it is appropriately stored, and the connection between the information and the material is maintained. 4. The Garden is duly acknowledged in the event that publications on the material are produced, and a copy of each such publication is given to the Garden without separate request. 5. The material or any products arising from it are passed to third parties only under the conditions listed in the agreement. Note: By ordering material from the Delectus Seminum 2017 you declare that you understand and accept the above conditions. Seeds were collected in 2014, 2015, and 2016. The accessions collected from Finland are stored long-term according to the Millennium Seed Bank Partneship Standards (http://brahmsonline.kew.org/Content/Projects/msbp/Resources/MSBP_seed_conservation_standar ds.pdf). The material from Southern Russia has been stored at room temperature since its collection in 2014. Victoria cruziana seeds have been sampled from a glasshouse plant years 2015-2017 and are kept in cool water. Request for material should reach us before March 31, 2017. Material is provided on a ‘first- come-first-served’ basis. Orders online https://tinyurl.com/desiderata2017 2 ebgconsortiumindexseminum2013 ABBREVIATIONS AND NOMENCLATURE WGS84 Collecting localities are located according to the international (WGS84) coordinate system, when the information has been available. Map on inside back cover shows biogeographic provinces of Finland. W Wild collected G Cultivated (garden origin) FI-0-H-2016-0661 An example of an IPEN number. We follow International Plant Exchange Network (IPEN) Code of Conduct. Explanation: FI = country of origin, i.e. Finland; 0 = no restrictions of transfer; H = garden code, i.e. Helsinki; 2016-0661 = accession number of the garden. Nomenclature The nomenclature of the Scandinavian plants is according to Jonsell, B. et al. (eds.), 2000, Flora Nordica 1; 2001, Flora Nordica 2; and 2010, Flora Nordica 6, where applicable and Hämet-Ahti, L. et al. (eds.), 1998, Retkeilykasvio (the Field Flora of Finland), 4th edition, except that APG IV taxonomy has been applied at the family level. Other names of the taxa outside Scandinavia follow mainly taxonomy of local floras. Authors are abbreviated according to the International Plant Names Index (www.ipni.org, accessed 31/01/2017). 3 ebgconsortiumindexseminum2013 CONTENTS I SEEDS COLLECTED FROM FINLAND ............................................................................................................. 5 II SEEDS COLLECTED FROM SOUTHERN RUSSIA .......................................................................................... 13 III SEEDS COLLECTED FROM THE GLASSHOUSES ......................................................................................... 15 COLLECTORS .............................................................................................................................................. 16 THE BIOGEOGRAPHICAL PROVINCES IN FINLAND ....................................................................................... 17 4 ebgconsortiumindexseminum2013 I SEEDS COLLECTED FROM FINLAND MAGNOLIOPHYTINA MAGNOLIOPSIDA Apiaceae W FI-0-H-2016-0554 Laserpitium latifolium L. Finland. Åland (A/Al). Jomala. Nåtö nature conservation area, Nygård house. WGS84 60°02’49”N 19°58’31”E. Alt. 3 m a.s.l. On yard near herb rich wooded meadow. C. 10 individuals sparsely in the garden; collected 3 fruiting heads from 3 individuals. Coll. Mari Miranto 81, 01/09/2016. W FI-0-H-2014-0662 Peucedanum palustre (L.) Moench Finland. Uusimaa (U/N). Kirkkonummi. Porkkalanniemi, from Vetokannas to area NE from the field station of the Finnish Maritime Administration. WGS84 59°59'1"N 24°24'39"E. A few individuals scattered in cracks of seashore rock along the coast with a span of a few hundred meters. Coll. Mari Miranto 13 & Botanic Garden staff, 02/09/2014. Apocynaceae W FI-0-H-2015-0656 Vincetoxicum hirundinaria Medik. Finland. Varsinais-Suomi (V/Ab). Kemiönsaari. Örö, SW part of the island, on the dry meadow next to the radar tower. WGS84 59°48’25”N 22°58’31”E. Dry meadow. Seeds collected from 10-25 individuals in the area of 100 m2; total number of adult plants on the site more than 100. Coll. Terhi Ryttäri, 08/09/2015. Asteraceae W FI-0-H-2016-0474 Mycelis muralis (L.) Dumort. Finland. Uusimaa (U/N). Helsinki. Central Park between Länsi-Pasila and Ruskeasuo, W of the Horse riding school Keskustallin Ratsastukoulu (WGS84 60°11’58”N 24°55’01”E) and sporadically c. 300 m N along the track until the allotment garden. Herb-rich heath forest. Accompanying species: Oxalis acetosella, Maianthemum bifolium, Trientalis europaea, Paris quadrifolia, Dryopteris carthusiana, Epilobium angustifolium, Rubus idaeus, Chelidonium majus. Collecting area 1500 m2, population size 10-25, seeds sampled from 10-25 plants, proportion of seed-bearing individuals 90%. Coll. Mari Miranto 48 & Essi Huotari, 19/07/2016 and 28/07/2016. W FI-0-H-2016-0471 Pilosella officinarum F.W.Schultz & Sch.Bip. Finland. Uusimaa (U/N). Helsinki. Käpylä. N embankment of Käpylä railway station. Open sun- exposed, rocky railway embankment. Accompanying species: Pilosella spp., Hieracium spp., Trifolium spp. Collecting area 1500 m2, population size >500<1000, seeds sampled from >100<500plants, proportion of seed-bearing individuals 50-80%. Coll. Noora Hyrkäs, 30/06/2016. Brassicacecae W FI-0-H-2015-0662 Crambe marítima L. Finland. Varsinais-Suomi (V/Ab). Kemiönsaari. Örö, S part of the W shore. WGS84 59°48’14”N 22°18’31”E. Sandy sea shore. Seeds collected from 25-50 individuals; total number of adult plants on the site 100, of which less than half were giving seeds. Coll. Terhi Ryttäri, 09/09/2015. 5 ebgconsortiumindexseminum2013 Caprifoliaceae W FI-0-H-2016-0476 Linnaea borealis L. Finland. South Häme (EH/Ta). Kuhmoinen. Tehinniemi, in the vicinity of the road Takasenlahdentie. WGS84 66°33’45”N 25°23’26”E. Mesic heath forest. Accompanying species: Picea abies, Vaccinium myrtillus. Common in a large area. Coll. Mikael Lindholm, 18/07/2016 and 08/08/2016. W FI-0-H-2014-0653 Succisa pratensis Moench Finland. Uusimaa (U/N). Kirkkonummi. Porkkalanniemi, Vetokannas. WGS84 59°59'09.8"N 24°24'32.9"E. Cracks of seashore rock. Scarce. Coll. Mari Miranto 24 & Botanic Garden staff, 02/09/2014. W FI-0-H-2016-0494 Valeriana officinalis L. Finland. Uusimaa (U/N). Espoo. Leppävaara, cycle path verge running along road Turuntie, edge of a field, c. 400 m E from the Mormon temple. WGS84 60°13'26”N 24°47'18”E. Field and cycle path verge, spanning c. 100 m. Accompanying species:
Recommended publications
  • Labour Market Areas Final Technical Report of the Finnish Project September 2017

    Labour Market Areas Final Technical Report of the Finnish Project September 2017

    Eurostat – Labour Market Areas – Final Technical report – Finland 1(37) Labour Market Areas Final Technical report of the Finnish project September 2017 Data collection for sub-national statistics (Labour Market Areas) Grant Agreement No. 08141.2015.001-2015.499 Yrjö Palttila, Statistics Finland, 22 September 2017 Postal address: 3rd floor, FI-00022 Statistics Finland E-mail: [email protected] Yrjö Palttila, Statistics Finland, 22 September 2017 Eurostat – Labour Market Areas – Final Technical report – Finland 2(37) Contents: 1. Overview 1.1 Objective of the work 1.2 Finland’s national travel-to-work areas 1.3 Tasks of the project 2. Results of the Finnish project 2.1 Improving IT tools to facilitate the implementation of the method (Task 2) 2.2 The finished SAS IML module (Task 2) 2.3 Define Finland’s LMAs based on the EU method (Task 4) 3. Assessing the feasibility of implementation of the EU method 3.1 Feasibility of implementation of the EU method (Task 3) 3.2 Assessing the feasibility of the adaptation of the current method of Finland’s national travel-to-work areas to the proposed method (Task 3) 4. The use and the future of the LMAs Appendix 1. Visualization of the test results (November 2016) Appendix 2. The lists of the LAU2s (test 12) (November 2016) Appendix 3. The finished SAS IML module LMAwSAS.1409 (September 2017) 1. Overview 1.1 Objective of the work In the background of the action was the need for comparable functional areas in EU-wide territorial policy analyses. The NUTS cross-national regions cover the whole EU territory, but they are usually regional administrative areas, which are the re- sult of historical circumstances.
  • Espoo-Salo Oikoradan Yleisötilaisuus Lohja, Laurentius-Sali, 30.10.2019, Klo 18-20 Mäenpää Heidi 30.10.2019 Yleisötilaisuuden Ohjelma

    Espoo-Salo Oikoradan Yleisötilaisuus Lohja, Laurentius-Sali, 30.10.2019, Klo 18-20 Mäenpää Heidi 30.10.2019 Yleisötilaisuuden Ohjelma

    Kirkkonummi Espoo-Salo oikoradan yleisötilaisuus Lohja, Laurentius-sali, 30.10.2019, klo 18-20 Mäenpää Heidi 30.10.2019 Yleisötilaisuuden ohjelma Klo 18.00 Alkusanat ja hankkeen yleisesittely Projektipäällikkö Heidi Mäenpää, Väylävirasto Klo 18.05 Kaupungin puheenvuoro Kaupunginjohtaja Mika Sivula, Lohjan kaupunki Klo 18.15 Maakuntaliiton puheenvuoro Liikennesuunnittelija Pasi Kouhia, Uudenmaan liitto Klo 18.25 Hankkeen suunnittelutilanne: • Rantarataselvitys, kysyntäennuste ja liikenneselvitys • Helsinki–Turku nopean junayhteyden hankekokonaisuuden ympäristövaikutusten arviointi Projektipäällikkö Heidi Mäenpää, Väylävirasto Klo 18.40 Rata- ja tieteknisten ratkaisujen esittely Projektipäällikkö Seppo Veijovuori, Sitowise Projektipäällikkö Kari Fagerholm, Pöyry Klo 18.55 Vaikutusten arviointi Ympäristöasioista vastaava Eevaliisa Härö, Ramboll Klo 19.10 Kysymyksiä ja keskustelua Päätössanat Esitysten jälkeen on mahdollista tutustua karttoihin yhdessä suunnittelijoiden kanssa Klo 20.00 Tilaisuus päättyy 2 Hankkeen yleisesittely Projektipäällikkö Heidi Mäenpää, Väylävirasto 3 Helsinki-Turku nopea junayhteys 4 Espoo-Salo oikorata, yleissuunnitelma • Maakuntakaavan mukainen linjaus • Rataa noin 94 km • Tunneleita 22 kpl, noin 15 km • Siltoja 113 kpl, noin 11 km • Tiet, kadut • Vaikutukset • Melu • Ympäristö • Ihmiset • Kustannukset 5 Suunnitteluprosessi RATALAKI • Esiselvitys • Tarveselvitykset • Liikenteelliset selvitykset • Kehittämisselvitykset YLEISSUUNNITELMA RATASUUNNITELMA RAKENTAMIS- • YVA • Maakuntakaavan ja • Asemakaavan mukainen
  • Prices of Dwellings in Housing Companies

    Prices of Dwellings in Housing Companies

    Housing 2019 Prices of dwellings in housing companies 2019, July Prices of old dwellings in housing companies rose on annual level in Greater Helsinki and declined in the rest of Finland According to Statistics Finland's preliminary data, prices of old dwellings in housing companies rose compared to July 2018 by about two per cent in Greater Helsinki, while in the rest of Finland they fell by 2.8 per cent. Development of prices of old dwellings in housing companies by month, index 2015=100. The heading of the figure was corrected on 29 August 2019. Compared to June, prices went down by 1.7 per cent in Greater Helsinki and in the rest of Finland by 1.5 per cent. Compared with the corresponding period last year, among large cities, prices of old dwellings in housing companies rose clearly only in Helsinki. In Espoo and Vantaa, the prices remained on level with the previous year. In the other large cities, prices have gone down from last year according to preliminary data. Helsinki 28.8.2019 Quoting is encouraged provided Statistics Finland is acknowledged as the source. The preliminary data comprise, on average, one half of completed transactions of old dwellings in blocks of flats and terraced houses. Particularly in summer months, the number of transactions in the latest release of the monthly statistics may remain lower than usual and be supplemented in the coming months. The price development should also be examined over a longer period than one month. According to data available to Statistics Finland, 31,902 transactions of old dwellings in housing companies were made in the whole country in January to July, which is on level with the previous year.
  • Maine Coefficient of Conservatism

    Maine Coefficient of Conservatism

    Coefficient of Coefficient of Scientific Name Common Name Nativity Conservatism Wetness Abies balsamea balsam fir native 3 0 Abies concolor white fir non‐native 0 Abutilon theophrasti velvetleaf non‐native 0 3 Acalypha rhomboidea common threeseed mercury native 2 3 Acer ginnala Amur maple non‐native 0 Acer negundo boxelder non‐native 0 0 Acer pensylvanicum striped maple native 5 3 Acer platanoides Norway maple non‐native 0 5 Acer pseudoplatanus sycamore maple non‐native 0 Acer rubrum red maple native 2 0 Acer saccharinum silver maple native 6 ‐3 Acer saccharum sugar maple native 5 3 Acer spicatum mountain maple native 6 3 Acer x freemanii red maple x silver maple native 2 0 Achillea millefolium common yarrow non‐native 0 3 Achillea millefolium var. borealis common yarrow non‐native 0 3 Achillea millefolium var. millefolium common yarrow non‐native 0 3 Achillea millefolium var. occidentalis common yarrow non‐native 0 3 Achillea ptarmica sneezeweed non‐native 0 3 Acinos arvensis basil thyme non‐native 0 Aconitum napellus Venus' chariot non‐native 0 Acorus americanus sweetflag native 6 ‐5 Acorus calamus calamus native 6 ‐5 Actaea pachypoda white baneberry native 7 5 Actaea racemosa black baneberry non‐native 0 Actaea rubra red baneberry native 7 3 Actinidia arguta tara vine non‐native 0 Adiantum aleuticum Aleutian maidenhair native 9 3 Adiantum pedatum northern maidenhair native 8 3 Adlumia fungosa allegheny vine native 7 Aegopodium podagraria bishop's goutweed non‐native 0 0 Coefficient of Coefficient of Scientific Name Common Name Nativity
  • LUETTELO Kuntien Ja Seurakuntien Tuloveroprosenteista Vuonna 2021

    LUETTELO Kuntien Ja Seurakuntien Tuloveroprosenteista Vuonna 2021

    Dnro VH/8082/00.01.00/2020 LUETTELO kuntien ja seurakuntien tuloveroprosenteista vuonna 2021 Verohallinto on verotusmenettelystä annetun lain (1558/1995) 91 a §:n 3 momentin nojalla, sellaisena kuin se on laissa 520/2010, antanut seuraavan luettelon varainhoitovuodeksi 2021 vahvistetuista kuntien, evankelis-luterilaisen kirkon ja ortodoksisen kirkkokunnan seurakuntien tuloveroprosenteista. Kunta Kunnan Ev.lut. Ortodoks. tuloveroprosentti seurakunnan seurakunnan tuloveroprosentti tuloveroprosentti Akaa 22,25 1,70 2,00 Alajärvi 21,75 1,75 2,00 Alavieska 22,00 1,80 2,10 Alavus 21,25 1,75 2,00 Asikkala 20,75 1,75 1,80 Askola 21,50 1,75 1,80 Aura 21,50 1,35 1,75 Brändö 17,75 2,00 1,75 Eckerö 19,00 2,00 1,75 Enonkoski 21,00 1,60 1,95 Enontekiö 21,25 1,75 2,20 Espoo 18,00 1,00 1,80 Eura 21,00 1,50 1,75 Eurajoki 18,00 1,60 2,00 Evijärvi 22,50 1,75 2,00 Finström 19,50 1,95 1,75 Forssa 20,50 1,40 1,80 Föglö 17,50 2,00 1,75 Geta 18,50 1,95 1,75 Haapajärvi 22,50 1,75 2,00 Haapavesi 22,00 1,80 2,00 Hailuoto 20,50 1,80 2,10 Halsua 23,50 1,70 2,00 Hamina 21,00 1,60 1,85 Hammarland 18,00 1,80 1,75 Hankasalmi 22,00 1,95 2,00 Hanko 21,75 1,60 1,80 Harjavalta 21,50 1,75 1,75 Hartola 21,50 1,75 1,95 Hattula 20,75 1,50 1,80 Hausjärvi 21,50 1,75 1,80 Heinola 20,50 1,50 1,80 Heinävesi 21,00 1,80 1,95 Helsinki 18,00 1,00 1,80 Hirvensalmi 20,00 1,75 1,95 Hollola 21,00 1,75 1,80 Huittinen 21,00 1,60 1,75 Humppila 22,00 1,90 1,80 Hyrynsalmi 21,75 1,75 1,95 Hyvinkää 20,25 1,25 1,80 Hämeenkyrö 22,00 1,70 2,00 Hämeenlinna 21,00 1,30 1,80 Ii 21,50 1,50 2,10 Iisalmi
  • Land Use and Planning Review 2021 Texts: City of Helsinki Urban Environment Division (Kymp.Viestinta@Hel.Fi)

    Land Use and Planning Review 2021 Texts: City of Helsinki Urban Environment Division ([email protected])

    Land use and planning review 2021 Texts: City of Helsinki Urban Environment Division ([email protected]) Graphic design: Aste Helsinki Oy Brochures of the Urban Environment Division 2021:5 Cover image: Illustrative image of the Puhos Park planned for Itäkeskus.© Architects K2S and Playa Architects Contents New Helsinki developed in hubs ................................... 4 Participate and make a difference .................................7 Levels of planning ......................................................... 8 Current traffic projects .............................................. 16 Plans by district .........................................................20 New Helsinki developed in hubs n the future, Helsinki will become a more densely In the 2020s, the planning of construction and built city of distinctive districts, which also treas- traffic investments is focused particularly on the ures its valuable natural environments. In this former Malmi airport, Tuusulanväylä, Vihdintie, Jok- publication, we present current urban environ- eri Light Rail and Laajasalo. This has been decid- Iment planning projects and major construction pro- ed on in the city plan implementation programme, jects the City will launch in 2021. which will be updated in autumn 2021. Active zoning and housing production play a key The goal set by the City Council is that at least role in Helsinki’s recovery from the economic ef- 7,000 homes will be built in Helsinki every year. fects of the coronavirus pandemic. As part of the re- From 2023 onwards, this number will rise to at least covery, the city has identified and implemented more 8,000 homes. Housing production must be sustain- agile use of public space, for example for café and able and diverse and preserve nature and green ar- restaurant operations, and experiments will be con- eas as well as possible.
  • Vorläufiger Bericht Über Neuerungen in Der Im Entstehen Begriffenen Vierten Aufage Der Exkursionsfora

    Vorläufiger Bericht Über Neuerungen in Der Im Entstehen Begriffenen Vierten Aufage Der Exkursionsfora

    Neilreichia 9: 355–388 (2018) Vorläufiger Bericht über Neuerungen in der im Entstehen begriffenen vierten Auflage der Exkursionsflora Manfred A. Fischer1 & Peter Englmaier2 1 Department für Botanik und Biodiversitätsforschung, Universität Wien, Rennweg 14, 1030 Wien, Österreich; E-Mail: [email protected] 2 Fakultät für Lebenswissenschaften, Universität Wien, Althanstraße 14, 1090 Wien, Österreich, E-Mail: [email protected] Abstract: Provisional report on novelties approaching the fourth edition of the Austrian Excursion Flora Some geographic, taxonomic, floristic, and nomenclatural changes, for the time being, are re- ported. The geographical range is enlarged as to comprise the entire Eastern Alps, i. e. also the Bavarian Alps, eastern Grisons, the Italian Alps East of lake Como und the Slovenian Alps. In addition to changes mentioned already in Neilreichia 6 (2011) and 7 (2015), the most important changes are: Dryopteridaceae (s. lat.) are split into Athyriaceae, Cystopteridaceae, Dryopteri- daceae s. str., Onocleaceae and Woodsiaceae; Dryopteris lacunosa is a new apogamic species within D. affinis agg. – Aegilops and Triticum are kept separate; Bromus remains s. lat. (including Ceratochloa, Bromopsis, and Anisantha); Festuca includes Drymochloa, Leucopoa, Psilurus, and Vulpia; Lolium s. lat. includes Schedonorus; Koeleria is expanded to include Trisetum spicatum; Gaudinia and Trisetum s. str. remain separate; Pennisetum and Cenchrus are fused; Oloptum is split from Piptatherum; Poa and Bellardiochloa are separated; Psilathera and Sesleriella are split from Sesleria. – Lloydia is included in Gagea. – Neottia s. str. is maintained and Listera thus remains as a paraphyletic genus; Platanthera bifolia consists of two subspecies – Arenaria is split into Eremogone (E.
  • Infestation of Field Dodder (Cuscuta Campestris Yunck.)

    Infestation of Field Dodder (Cuscuta Campestris Yunck.)

    plants Article Infestation of Field Dodder (Cuscuta campestris Yunck.) Promotes Changes in Host Dry Weight and Essential Oil Production in Two Aromatic Plants, Peppermint and Chamomile Marija Sari´c-Krsmanovi´c 1,*, Ana Dragumilo 2, Jelena Gaji´cUmiljendi´c 1, Ljiljana Radivojevi´c 1, Ljiljana Šantri´c 1 and Rada Ðurovi´c-Pejˇcev 1 1 Institute of Pesticides and Environmental Protection, Banatska 31b, 11080 Belgrade, Serbia; [email protected] (J.G.U.); [email protected] (L.R.); [email protected] (L.Š.); [email protected] (R.Ð.-P.) 2 Institute for Medicinal Plant Research “Dr. Josif Panˇci´c”,Tadeuša Koš´cuška1, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +38-111-3076-133 Received: 13 July 2020; Accepted: 23 September 2020; Published: 29 September 2020 Abstract: Peppermint (Mentha piperita L.) and chamomile (Chamomilla recutita (L.) Rausch.) are aromatic plants with considerable economic value. These plants and their essential oils are used in medicine, cosmetics, and the food industry. One of the main limiting factors in peppermint and chamomile commercial cultivation is weed competition since weeds are able to decrease both oil amount and biomass yield. The purpose of the present study was to determine the effect of parasitism by field dodder (Cuscuta campestris Yunck.) on peppermint and chamomile dry weight and their essential oil yield and composition. Essential oils from both noninfested and infested peppermint and chamomile plants were obtained by hydrodistillation and characterized chemically by gas chromatography (GC) coupled with mass spectrometry (MS). The amount of dry matter accumulated by peppermint and chamomile plants infested by field dodder was lower (25% and 63%, respectively) compared to noninfested plants.
  • 13 01 03 Tilastollinen Vuosikirj

    13 01 03 Tilastollinen Vuosikirj

    Tätä julkaisua myy Helsingin kaupungin tietokeskus Kirjasto, Siltasaarenkatu – A PL , Helsingin kaupunki Hinta euroa Denna publikation säljes av Helsingfors stads faktacentral Bibliotek, Broholmsgatan – A PB , Helsingfors stad Pris euro tieke_tvk12_kannet.indd 1 28.11.2012 19:49:52 tieke_tvk12_kannet.indd 2 28.11.2012 19:49:52 . vuosikerta ● årgång tieke_tvk12_nimio.indd 1 28.11.2012 19:50:57 Helsingin kaupunki, tietokeskus Helsingfors stad, faktacentralen City of Helsinki Urban Facts Osoite PL , Helsingin kaupunki (Siltasaarenkatu – A) Adress PB , Helsingfors stad (Broholmsgatan – A) Address P.O.Box , FI- City of Helsinki, Finland (Siltasaarenkatu – A) Puhelin Telefon Telephone + Telefax Julkaisutilaukset puh. Beställning av publikationer tfn Publications can be ordered tel. + Käteismyynti Tietokeskuksen kirjasto, Siltasaarenk. – A, puh. Direktförsäljning Faktacentralens bibliotek, Broholmsg. – A, tfn Direct sales Urban Facts Library, Siltasaarenkatu – A, tel. + Tiedustelut Tilastot ja tietopalvelu Förfrågningar Statistik och informationstjänst Inquiries Statistics and information services Sini Askelo, puh. ● tfn , [email protected] Aila Perttilä, puh. ● tfn , [email protected] Telekopio , telefax + ISSN-L - ISSN - (Verkossa) ISSN - (Painettu) Kirjapaino Tryckeri Print WS Bookwell Oy, Porvoo tieke_tvk12_nimio.indd 2 28.11.2012 19:50:57 Sisältö Innehåll Contents Esipuhe .........................................................................................................................................................................................4
  • 2009 Baka Kadri Reinsoo

    2009 Baka Kadri Reinsoo

    Tartu Ülikool Loodus- ja tehnoloogiateaduskond Geograafia osakond Bakalaureusetöö inimgeograafias Eestikeelse elanikkonna paiknemine Helsingis aastatel 1995–2008 Kadri Reinsoo Juhendaja: PhD Kadri Leetmaa Kaitsmisele lubatud: Juhendaja Osakonna juhataja Tartu 2009 SISUKORD 1. SISSEJUHATUS ............................................................................................................ 4 2. UURIMUSE TEOREETILINE TAUST......................................................................... 6 2.1 Linnaökoloogline lähenemisviis ............................................................................... 7 2.2 Positivistlik lähenemisviis ........................................................................................ 9 2.3 Käitumuslik lähenemisviis........................................................................................ 9 2.3.1 Ratsionaalse valiku teooriad ............................................................................ 10 2.3.2 Etnilis-kultuuriline lähenemine........................................................................ 11 2.4 Strukturalistlik-institutsionaalne lähenemine.......................................................... 12 2.5 Konstruktsionistlik lähenemine .............................................................................. 13 2.6 Eluviisi ja argikäitumise mõju rõhutav lähenemine................................................ 14 2.7 Etnilise segregatsiooni positiivsed ja negatiivsed aspektid .................................... 14 2.7.1 Positiivsed.......................................................................................................
  • Ecography ECOG-05013

    Ecography ECOG-05013

    Ecography ECOG-05013 Aikio, S., Ramula, S., Muola, A. and von Numers, M. 2020. Island properties dominate species traits in determining plant colonizations in an archipelago system. – Ecography doi: 10.1111/ecog.05013 Supplementary material Supplementary material Appendix 1 Fig. A1. Pairwise relationships and correlation coefficients of the island variables in the AIC- simplified model. 1 Fig. A2. Pairwise relationships and correlation coefficients of the plant traits in the AIC- simplified model. 2 Dispersal_vector [wind_water] Dispersal_vector [endozoochor] Dispersal_vector [unspecialised] Historical_total_log Pollen_vector [abiotic_insect] Life_form [herb] Dispersal_vector [myrmerochor] Dispersal_vector [epizoochor] Area_log Plant_height_log Limestone [Yes] Convolution Buffer_2_km_log Life_cycle [short] Seed_mass_log Veg_repr [Yes] North_limit Seed_bank [transient] Ellenberg_Nitrogen Ellenberg_Moisture Residents_per_area_log Ellenberg_Temperature Ellenberg_Reaction Shannon_habitats Shore_meadow Deciduous_forest Mixed_forest Marsh Buffer_5_km_log Buildings Euref_X Meadow_or_pasture Euref_Y Eklund_culture SLA Ellenberg_Light Coniferous_forest Sand Open_rock_or_bare_ground Seed_bank [unknown] Apomictic [Yes] Life_form [woody] Pollen_vector [insect] Pollen_vector [abiotic_self] Dist_to_historical_log Pollen_vector [self] Pollen_vector [insect_self] 0.2 0.5 1 2 5 10 Odds Ratio Fig. A3. Odds ratios (i.e., exp[parameter estimate]) and 95% confidence intervals for the fixed effects of the colonization model (full model of all 587 species with
  • Resource Choice in Cuscuta Europaea (Plant Dlstbn/Nduar Autonomy/Donal Plants/Parsl Plants/Bost Dhice) COLLEEN K

    Resource Choice in Cuscuta Europaea (Plant Dlstbn/Nduar Autonomy/Donal Plants/Parsl Plants/Bost Dhice) COLLEEN K

    Proc. Natd. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 89, pp. 12194-12197, December 1992 Ecology Resource choice in Cuscuta europaea (plant dlstbn/nduar autonomy/donal plants/parsl plants/bost dhice) COLLEEN K. KELLY* Edward Grey Institute, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PS, United Kingdom Communicated by Robert M. May, September 4, 1992 (receivedfor review June 30, 1992) ABSTRACT Individual stems with growing tps of dodder METHODS AND MATERIALS (Cuscuta europaea) were rnsplanted onto host plants (haw- thorn) of varying nt l statu. The p ite was more Dodder (Convolvulaceae) has no roots, only vestigial leaves, likely to coil on ("accept") hosts ofhih nutritional status and and does not photosynthesize. A stem of dodder infests its grow away from ("reject") hosts of poor qual. Dodder hosts by forming one or more loops about the host stem or leaf (a coiling bout), after which it sends pegs of absorptive exhibits this acc rejection respome befm taking up tissue (haustoria) into the host vascular system. Dodder any food from the host, so it is possible to dsole active possesses responses that may be used to effect rejection (Fig. choice from the passive effects of growth and m it. 1) and acceptance of resources. These responses are com- Probability of acceptance is gauged to expected reward. plete prior to any resource uptake and thus cannot be confused with the passive results of uptake (16). Higher plants vary in size and shape through variation in Hawthorn (Crataegus monogyna) is a native host of this number or morphology ofthe repeating subunits (modules) of dodder in Great Britain (26).