Newport Back Bay Fluid Flow

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Newport Back Bay Fluid Flow Newport Back Bay Fluid Flow Natalie Albor Alexander Holtz Alan Nguyen August 17, 2012 Abstract Water qualities including oxygen, salinity, temperature, and pH are all important qualities of estuaries and coastal systems. They are important to the many animals and aquatic species that can be found there. At the Newport Back Bay, an estuary in Southern California, the mixture of freshwater and saltwater is a delicate environment that many animals have adapted to. We monitored the fluctuations in these qualities throughout the bay using a refractometer on water samples, and also a multi-probe to collect data in the bay over several weeks. We analyzed the effect of fluid flow in the bay and how it disperses these qualities to be able to predict what effects would be seen if there were to be a change in the inflow from either the San Diego Creek (SDC) at the northern end of the estuary, or the Pacific Ocean at the southern end. Fluid flow determines the spread of freshwater and saltwater in the bay, and thus the unique estuarial results caused by this interaction. 1 Introduction the harbor. The water flow then dis- perses and spreads the uplifted sedi- In this study, we analyzed fluid flow of ment throughout the bay, disturbing Upper Newport Bay (UNB) and Lower the settled shellfish, plants, and fish. Newport Bay (LNB) to predict water flow patterns and dispersion of various Within the next decade, the Irvine nutrients such as salinity, pH, temper- Water Company plans on increasing ature, and dissolved oxygen. Being an the San Diego Creek (SDC) water flow estuary, UNB is a mixture of freshwa- into the UNB by ten-fold, dramatically ter and saltwater, making the fluid flow increasing the flow of freshwater into within the bay to be very important to the bay [11]. This new change of wa- the ecosystem. The salt and oxygen ter flow can affect the sensitive bivalves levels are critical to the development and other animals in their relation- and health of the aquatic animals. In ship to the habitat. There have been addition to the many fish and plants many extensive studies into the affects that prosper in the bay, there are also of decreasing the amount of freshwa- many species of bivalves that thrive in ter flow into an estuary, such as in San varying conditions of fresh and salt wa- Francisco, which clearly depicts a neg- ter. In the LNB, dredging is taking ative outcome [1]. Such results include place to allow the passage of ships to a reduction in natural nutrients and 1 shellfish populations with the intro- ability to thrive. ductory of predatory marine animals. In particular, the many species of Although there are not many studies bivalves that reside in UNB and LNB showing the effects of increasing the are essential to the health of the har- freshwater flow, it is predictable that bor. The bivalves, which include vari- there will be a negative outcome. The ous clams and oysters, mainly prey on results could include reduced salinity the millions of phytoplankton that live and die-offs of salinity sensitive plants, in the water, which controls their num- fish, and shellfish. Many of the species bers to a reasonable amount. If the bi- that reside in UNB are endangered in- valves were removed from the harbor cluding the light-footed clapper rail. due to inhabitable water conditions, With the possible change in food sup- the phytoplankton population would ply and nutrients available due to the increase beyond control, thus causing change in freshwater flow, these species eutrophication in the water [10]. This may lose their homes and become ex- will eventually lead to hypoxic condi- tinct. tions, meaning a depletion of oxygen The dredging of LNB is viewed as a in the water, which would cause the necessary action needed to allow move- other aquatic animals to lower in num- ments of ships in the bay, and it is ber. Thus, it is important to ensure believed that any negative effects it that the water in the UNB and LNB is has on the surrounding environment favorable for the bivalves. are negligible. Changes to water qual- Bivalves and other aquatic animals ity due to pollutants mixing with sedi- depend upon favorable water quality ments, and changes in sediment trans- levels of oxygen, pH, salinity, and tem- port are a couple effects known to be perature. Modeling the variations of caused by dredging [6]. The water flow these nutrients is also beneficiary to see carries and disperses the uplifted pol- any fluctuations of the nutrients based lutants and can be transferred to ar- on time, space, and fluid flow. It will eas that were previously healthy. Al- enable us to have a better understand- though LNB is not the location for ing of the environment in general, and most of the endangered species living make predictions of change in water in the bay, it is still a location for quality based on a change of saltwa- fishing and for people to take part in ter/freshwater fluid flow. water activities. The water flow dis- persement of sediments and pollutants spreads throughout the bay, hurting 2 Methods the aquatic animals and the well being of people. 2.1 The Site Modeling the bathymetry and fluid flow throughout UNB and LNB is es- The Newport Bay is located in South- sential in understanding the disperse- ern California between San Diego and ment of freshwater from the SDC and Los Angeles, and is broken up into the pollutants from dredging. This knowl- Upper Newport Bay and Lower New- edge will help predict the impact on port Bay. The UNB is classified as an the estuary and the many species that estuary because it has the freshwater of live there, ensuring their survival and the San Diego Creek flowing into it and 2 the saltwater from the Pacific Ocean (through the LNB). It is about 5.5km in length and spreads about 1000 acres of total protected habitat. Since estu- aries are unique combinations of fresh water and salt water, the UNB is home to many endangered species placing it in the protection of California Bays and Estuaries Policy [7]. Lower Newport Bay [2] 2.2 Modeling Equations A basic understanding of fluid flow was first needed to approach our problem. The St. Venant equations (SVE), or also known as the shallow water equa- tions, provides a more theoretical ap- proach to fluid flow. The SVE are a set of hyperbolic partial differential equa- tions that describe the flow below a pressure surface in a fluid. The SVE is a combination of the continuity equa- tion @A @V @h V + A + b = 0 @t @x @t and the dynamic, or momentum equa- tion @h @V @V g + V + = g(i − j) @x @x @t Upper Newport Bay [4] where A is the cross-sectional area, h is the depth of flow, V is the mean ve- The LNB is the connecting harbor locity, b is the width of the top of the to UNB and the Pacific Ocean. It is a section, x is the position of the section semi-artificial harbor formed by dredg- measured from the upstream end, t is ing during the 1900s. Most of the area time, g is gravity, and ρ is the mass is covered with private homes, docks, density of the fluid. and businesses, including the two main In this form the equations cannot islands Lido Island and Balboa Island. be solved explicitly, having us use the The 39.8 square miles of LNB is con- more convenient characteristic form of stantly in need of dredging for the up- the SVE which is keep of the harbor and the 9000 boats d(v ± 2c) dx that reside there. = g(i−j) for = (v±c); dt dt 3 where c is the celerity, or speed of the a linear, first order, partial differential wave. With this method, numerical so- equation with constant coefficients. It lutions can be found. takes a function and moves it along an axis over time keeping the function in its same form. Note that the equation simply shifts the graph This equation is relevant to our even- tual fluid flow model of the Newport In the figure above, the graph repre- Back Bay because it mimics the tran- sents a flood wave at the upstream end sitional nature of moving water. Much of a channel. The zone of quiet repre- like how the transport equation rep- sents the part of the stream waiting for resents a certain function moving in a disturbance, or effect from a flowing the positive direction of the x-axis (dis- wave. For any point numbered on the tance), so does the Newport Back Bay graph, the velocity and celerity can be water current. We were able to solve determine numerically by the two pre- this derivation using Mathematica and vious points having direct connection created a three-dimensional Model of to it. For instance, the solutions for the transport equation. point 6 can be found using the veloc- ity and celerity from points 3 and 5. The SVE provides a conceptual under- standing for the basic introduction of fluid flow [9]. It allows us to solve nu- merically for specific points, but is dif- ficult to apply for a grander scale. In order to model the fluid flow within the Newport Bay, two partial differential equations were combined. These equations were the transport equation and the diffusion equation (based on Ficks Law of Diffusion). The transport equation Transport Model @u @u Unfortunately, the transport equa- = −k @t @x tion does not account for the spontane- ity of hydrogen molecules in water.
Recommended publications
  • Dissertation Submitted in Partial Satisfaction of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Biology
    LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY School of Science and Technology in conjunction with the Faculty of Graduate Studies ____________________ Factors Affecting Phytoplankton Biodiversity and Toxin Production by Tracey Magrann ____________________ A Dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Biology ____________________ June 2011 © 2011 Tracey Magrann All Rights Reserved Each person whose signature appears below certifies that this dissertation in his opinion is adequate, in scope and quality, as a dissertation for the degree Doctor of Philosophy. , Chairperson Stephen G. Dunbar, Associate Professor of Biology Danilo S. Boskovic, Assistant Professor of Biochemistry, School of Medicine H. Paul Buchheim, Professor of Geology William K. Hayes, Professor of Biology Kevin E. Nick, Associate Professor of Geology iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to express my deepest gratitude to Dr. Stephen G. Dunbar, who assisted with the majority of the editing and for his wonderful guidance throughout this research project, Dr. Danilo Boskovic for providing space in his laboratory, constructing data sheets, giving careful directions in proper water chemistry analysis techniques, and editing proficiency, Dr. Bill Hayes for his contribution in the statistics portion of this work, Dr. Martha Sutula for site selection and providing laboratory and field equipment, Dr. H. Paul Buchheim for contributing expertise in limnology, and Dr. Kevin Nick for his insightful editing contributions. I am also very thankful to those who provided grants and other funding which allowed this project to expand throughout five counties. The Southern California Coastal Waters Research Project (SCCWRP) funded the water chemistry analysis, and the toxin analysis was funded by grants from Marine Research Group (MRG) of Loma Linda University, the Southern California Academy of Sciences, Newport Bay Naturalists and Friends, El Dorado Audubon Society, Friends of Madrona Marsh, Sea and Sage Audubon Society, Blue Water Technologies, and Preserve Calavera.
    [Show full text]
  • Ron Yeo Papers
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/c82r3zpd No online items Ron Yeo Papers Aaron Manuel Leon Sherman Library and Gardens 614 Dahlia Ave. Corona del Mar, California 92625 (949) 673-1880 [email protected] http://www.slgardens.org/ 2019 Ron Yeo Papers 2019_5 1 Descriptive Summary Title: Ron Yeo Papers Dates: 1963-2005 Collection Number: 2019_5 Creator/Collector: Ron Yeo Extent: 17 archives boxes; 7 linear feet Repository: Sherman Library & Gardens Corona del Mar, California 92625 Abstract: Language of Material: English Access Open for research. Publication Rights Property rights to the physical object belong to the Sherman Library. Literary rights, including copyright, are retained by the creators and their heirs. It is the responsibility of the researcher to determine who holds the copyright and pursue the copyright owner or his or her heir for permission to publish where The Sherman Library does not hold the copyright. Preferred Citation Ron Yeo Papers. Sherman Library and Gardens Acquisition Information Ron Yeo donated these papers to Sherman Library in 2017 and 2019. Biographical Note Ron Yeo was born on June 17, 1933 in Los Angeles, California. He graduated from the University of Southern California with a Bachelor of Architecture in 1959. He was officially licensed in 1960 as an architect. In 1963, he founded Ron Yeo, Architect, Inc. With his office located in Corona del Mar, he worked on a variety of projects located in and around Orange County. In 1965, he was appointed to be on the board of directors for the University of California, Irvine’s “Project 21,” which had the goal to ensure that Orange County entered the 21st century with a well-planned area.
    [Show full text]
  • C Eatin Iable Blic Cce in Ppe Newp Tbay E Tbay
    C eatin iable blic cce in ppe Newp t Bay e t Bay ppe Newp t Bay Nat e e e ve and Ec l ical e e ve CONN E CH O C - E MEN O EN ONMEN L E GN - NG 2010 C eatin iable blic in ppe Newp t Bay e t Bay A Senior Project Presented to the Faculty of the Landscape Architecture Department of the University of California, Davis in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the Degree of Bachelors of Science in Landscape Architecture Accepted and Approved by Mark Francis, Faculty Senior Project Advisor Steve Greco, Faculty Committee Member Claire Napawan, Committee Member Dr. Deborah Elliott-Fisk, Committee Member eface The last mark I hope to make in our Landscape Architecture program is to show that a natural environment can co-exist in a reputably urbanized region. Southern California, specifically Orange County, is where I grew up and throughout the years, I have witnessed concrete lots and open spaces transform into shopping malls, car dealerships, housing tracts and small parks throughout the county. To visitors and those not native to Orange County, the notion that a natural environment still exists is very unlikely. However, when I was in third grade, I had the unique opportunity to visit an estuary called the Upper Newport Back Bay Nature Reserve located in Newport Beach. I learned the importance of tide habitats for plants and animals, how humans created endangered species, and several ways we could help save the Earth. It was a memorable field trip because it was my first hands-on experience in a delicate habitat, and even in my third grade mindset, I began to be more aware of how human actions affect the Earth.
    [Show full text]
  • Front Page Letters Calendars Archives Sign up Contact Us Stunewslaguna
    Front Page Letters Calendars Archives Sign Up Contact Us StuNewsLaguna Volume 4, Issue 16 | February 22, 2019 Search our site... 1 Search Police Files Arrest made in cold case murder of 11-year-old Linda O’Keefe, additional witnesses sought James Alan Neal, 72, of Colorado Springs, was arrested Tuesday, Feb. 19, in the Newport Beach cold case murder of 11-year-old Linda Ann O’Keefe from 1973. The Orange County District Attorney’s Office along with the Newport Beach Police NEWPORT Department announced at a joint press conference on Wednesday, Feb. 20 at 10 a.m. that BEACH James Alan Neal was identified as the suspect in the abduction, sexual molestation, and murder of 11-year-old Linda Ann O’Keefe, after a tireless and exhaustive investigation that Mist lasted for more than 45 years. Humidity: 81% Wind: 3.04 m/h 48.6°F MON TUE WED 48/48°F 49/57°F 52/58°F Click on photos for larger images Courtesy of OCDA and NBPD (L-R) James Alan Neal (now), James Alan Neal aka James Albert Layton Jr. (vintage photo) At the news conference, Orange County District Attorney Todd Spitzer said, “We believe he (Neal) did this beyond a reasonable doubt.” Neal was arrested Tuesday at 6:29 a.m. in “unremarkable” fashion. He is being held in Colorado and has yet to waive extradition. He will be charged with murder and two additional special circumstances, including kidnapping and lewd and lascivious acts. Click on photo for a larger image Courtesy of NBPD Linda O’Keefe, died July 1973, age 11 Spitzer said, “The significant arrest for the brutal sexual assault and murder of Linda O’Keefe is an affirmation to never give up on solving cold cases.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction 1 Executive Summary 2 Project Description 3 Environmental
    Introduction 1 Executive Summary 2 Project Description 3 Environmental Impact Analysis 4 Alternatives 5 Analysis of Long Term Effects 6 Effects Found Not to be Significant 7 Preparation Team 8 Organizations and Persons Consulted 9 1 Introduction 2 Executive Summary 3 Project Description 4 Environmental Impact Analysis 5 Alternatives 6 Analysis of Long Term Effects 7 Effects Found Not to be Significant 8 Preparation Team 9 References Aesthetics 4.1 This section discusses potential impacts to scenic vistas and visual resources in the planning area, and the potential for adverse changes in the visual character and quality to occur as a result of implementing the proposed land use changes and urban design policies. Potential impacts associated with light and glare are also addressed. During the scoping meeting held on November 30, 2015, attendees raised concerns regarding the potential for new development in certain districts and neighborhoods to conflict with the existing building character. In particular, concerns were raised about the potential for taller, higher-density development to be built in areas that historically have had only one- and two-story buildings. Additionally, several people stated that impacts related to shade and shadowing need to be addressed in the EIR. These concerns are addressed below under Impact 4.1.C. Existing Conditions The planning area is almost completely urbanized. Costa Mesa sits atop a plateau approximately one mile from the Pacific Ocean. The Pacific Ocean can be seen along the City’s western boundary, where the coastline creates a distinctive visual background. The eastern edge of the City affords some views of Upper Newport Bay.
    [Show full text]
  • Selected Geologic Literature on the California Continental Borderland and Adjacent Areas, to January 1, 1975
    Selected Geologic Literature on the California Continental Borderland and Adjacent Areas, To January 1, 1975 By Albert E. Roberts GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CIRCULAR 714 1975 United States Department of the Interior ROGERS C. B. MORTON, Secretary Geological Survey V. E. McKelvey, Director Free on application to U.S. Geological Survey, National Center, Reston, Va 22092 Contents INTRODUCTION ------------------------------------------------ 1 EXPLANATION OF BIBLIOGRAPHIC REFERENCES --------------------- 3 SERIAL LIST ------------------------------------------------- 4 REFERENCES BY AUTHOR Published reports -------------------------------------- 12 Published abstracts ------------------------------------ 75 Unpublished reports ------------------------------------ 85 SUBJECT INDEX ----------------------------------------------- 95 Illustrations Cover. Orthographic drawing of California Continental Borderland and vicinity by Tau Rho Alpha (1970) Figure 1. Index map of California Continental Borderland and vicinity ------------------------------------- 2 iii Selected Geologic Literature on the California Continental Borderland and Adiacent Areas, to January 1, 1975 By Albert E. Roberts INTRODUCTION Among the prospective areas of the United States for developing substantial new petroleum reserves is the California Continental Borderland. However, the likelihood of finding large supplies of petroleum in this submarine area is difficult to evaluate without detailed information on the bedrock of the sea floor. Altho~gh much information of this kind has been
    [Show full text]
  • Planning Areas.FH11
    APPENDIX A NOTICE OF PREPARATION/INITIAL STUDY/ NOP COMMENT LETTERS Notice of Preparation and Scoping Meeting for the Back Bay Landing Project Environmental Impact Report DATE: October 1, 2012 SUBJECT: Back Bay Landing Project - Notice of Preparation of an Environmental Impact Report and Notice of Public Scoping Meeting PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The Back Bay Landing project is a proposed integrated, mixed-use waterfront village on an approximately 7 acre portion of a 31.4 acre parcel located adjacent to the Upper Newport Bay in the City of Newport Beach. The majority of the project site (6.332 acres) is located immediately north of East Coast Highway between Bayside Drive and the Bayside Marina adjacent to the Upper Newport Bay. The balance of the project site (0.642-acres) is located under and immediately south of the East Coast Highway bridge. The project site is illustrated on the map below. The proposed project involves land use amendments to provide the legislative framework for future development of the site. Amendments to the General Plan and Coastal Land Use Plan are required to change the land use designations to a Mixed-Use Horizontal designation and a Planned Community Development Plan (PCDP) is proposed to establish appropriate zoning regulations and development standards for Parcel 3. The requested approvals will provide for a horizontally distributed mix of uses, which will include visitor-serving recreational and marine commercial retail, office, marine office, boat services, marine services, and enclosed dry stack boat storage along with a vertical and horizontal mix of multi-family residential over retail and multi-family residential flats, as regulated by the proposed Back Bay Landing PCDP.
    [Show full text]
  • CULTURAL RESOURCES Assessmevts
    APPENDIX D CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENTS March 05, 2013 Jaime Murillo, Associate Planner CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH 3300 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, CA 92663 Re: HISTORIC RESOURCES ASSESSMENT LETTER REPORT, NEWPORT BACK BAY Dear Mr. Murillo: This Historic Resources Assessment letter report, completed by PCR Services Corporation (PCR), documents and evaluates the federal, state, and local significance and eligibility of the properties located at Back Bay Landing Project Area, Newport Beach, Orange County, California. The Historic Resources Assessment letter report includes a discussion of the survey methods used, a brief historic context of the property and surrounding area, and the identification and evaluation of the subject property. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Back Bay Landing project waterfront village will be located on 6.974 acres in the City of Newport Beach (“City”) in Orange County, California. Subsequent to the requested legislative approvals, future development on-site would be regulated by the development standards and design guidelines established in the PCDP, which would allow for a mixed-use development with the maximum development limits. A future on-site mixed-use development project would be designed with a Coastal Mediterranean architectural theme. It is proposed that existing Orange County Sanitation District 5 Bay Bridge Station (Pump House) (1966) will be rehabilitated and the commercial storage garages on the eastern side of Parcel 3 (1961) will be demolished. RESEARCH AND FIELD METHODOLOGY The Historic Resource Assessment was conducted by PCR’s Historic Resources Division staff, Margarita J. Wuellner, Ph.D., Director of Historic Resources, Murray Miller, M. Arch., Principal Historic Preservation Planner, and Amanda Kainer, M.S., Assistant Architectural Historian, who meet and exceed the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualification Standards in history, historic architecture and architectural history.
    [Show full text]
  • Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project (Project No
    Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project (Project No. 5-67) RECIRCULATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT | JULY 2019 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT RECIRCULATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project Lead Agency: ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 Contact: Mr. Kevin Hadden Principal Staff Analyst 714.962.2411 Prepared by: MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL 5 Hutton Centre Drive, Suite 500 Santa Ana, California 92707 Contact: Mr. Alan Ashimine 949.472.3505 July 2019 JN 168975 This document is designed for double-sided printing to conserve natural resources. Recirculated Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1.0: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Project Location ............................................................................................................................ 1-1 1.2 Project Summary ........................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.3 Goals and Objectives ................................................................................................................... 1-2 1.4 Environmental Issues/Mitigation Summary ............................................................................. 1-2 1.5 Summary of Project Alternatives .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix a Notice of Preparation Part 2
    NATURAL RESOURCES AGENCY ARNOLD SCHWAR ZEN EGGER. GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION DIVISION OF OIL. GAS AND GEOTHERMAL RESOURCES 5816 Corporate A"t3nue • Suite 200 • CYPRESS. CAUFORNIA. 90630-4731 rHONE 714/816·6.S ~ 7 • FAX 714/816·6853 . WEBSlIE con~rvahO~~1\F _' BY P!ANI '. +__ ,,,.. !.lMENT March 24 , 2009 MAR Z5 2C~l Ms. Debby Linn, Contract Planner City of Newport Beach, Planning Department CnYJF Nt"Vv JI<I StACH 3300 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach. CA 92658 Subject: Notice of Preparation of a Program Environmental Impact Report for the Newport Banning Ranch Project. SCH 2009031061 Dear Ms. Linn: The Department of Conservation's Division of Oil , Gas, and Geothermal Resources (Division) has reviewed the above referenced project. We offer the following comments for your consideration, The Division is mandated by Section 3106 of the Public Resources Code (PRC) to supervise the drilling, operation, maintenance, and plugging and abandonment of wells for the purpose of preventing: (1) damage to life, health. property, and natural resources; (2) damage to underground and surface waters suitable for irrigation or domestic use; (3) loss of oil, gas, or reservoir energy; and (4) damage to oil and gas deposits by infiltrating water and other causes. Furthermore, the PRC vests in the State Oil and Gas Supervisor (Supervisor) the authority to regulate the manner of drilling, operation, maintenance, and abandonment of oil and gas wells so as to conserve, protect, and prevent waste of these resources, while at the same time encouraging operators to apply viable methods for the purpose of increasing the ultimate recovery of oil and gas.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix H Cultural Resources Report
    ___________________________________________________ APPENDIX H CULTURAL RESOURCES REPORT ___________________________________________________ This page intentionally left blank. CULTURAL RESOURCES RECONNAISSANCE FOR THE VILLAGE ENTRANCE PROJECT, LAGUNA BEACH, CALIFORNIA Prepared for Christopher A. Joseph & Associates 179 H. Street Petaluma, California 94952 Prepared by Joan C. Brown, M.A., RPA Stephen O’Neil, M.A. James W. Steely, M.S. SWCA ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS 23392 Madero, Suite L Mission Viejo, California 92691 (949) 770-8042 www.swca.com USGS 7.5-Minute Quadrangle Laguna Beach, California SWCA Project No. 10751-111 SWCA Cultural Resources Report Database No. 2006-200 April 2006 CULTURAL RESOURCES REPORT VILLAGES ENTRANCE PROJECT MANAGEMENT SUMMARY/ABSTRACT Purpose and Scope: Christopher A. Joseph & Associates contracted with SWCA Environmental Consultants to undertake cultural resources documentary research and a pedestrian reconnaissance as part of the California Environmental Quality Act review process in anticipation of the Village Entrance project. The services entailed a literature review of the study area including a 1-mile radius around the property, a historic evaluation of the building, and a pedestrian reconnaissance to determine if cultural resources are visible on the surface. This report documents the results of the cultural resources study. Dates of Investigation: The cultural resources literature search was completed January 19, 2006, and the cultural resources pedestrian reconnaissance was completed March 2, 2006, by SWCA Archaeologist Stephen O’Neil. This report was completed in April 2006. The historic study by Jim Steely was performed during April 2006. Findings of the Investigation: The literature review at the South Central Coastal Information Center, located at California State University, Fullerton, revealed that 11 cultural resources are recorded within a 1-mile radius of the current study area.
    [Show full text]
  • NROC 2013 Annual Report
    NNaattuurree RReesseerrvvee ooff OOrraannggee CCoouunnttyy County of Orange Central/Coastal NCCP/HCP 2013 ANNUAL REPORT 2013 ANNUAL REPORT Nature Reserve of Orange County 15600 Sand Canyon Avenue Irvine, CA 92618 www.naturereserveoc.org Nature Reserve of Orange County ANNUAL REPORT 2013 Table of Contents BACKGROUND AND INTRODUCTION......................................................................................1 1.0 NROC ORGANIZATIONAL GOVERNANCE AND ANNUAL REPORT OVERVIEW ........... 1 1.1 Board of Directors Milestones in 2013 .................................................................... 1 1.2 Annual Report Format Revision ................................................................................ 2 2.0 NROC SCIENTIFIC PROGRAM STATUS AND WORK PLAN 2013-14 ............................. 6 2.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................6 2.2 Work Plan Table ....................................................................................................7 2.3 Project Descriptions ...............................................................................................8 2.4 Potential In Development Projects ........................................................................ 43 2.5 Habitat Restoration & Enhancement Summary Tables ......................................... 44 2.6 A 17-Year Retrospective ...................................................................................... 46 3.0 NROC CONSERVATION CUSTODIAL FUNDS ...............................................................
    [Show full text]