DOCSLIB.ORG

NROC 2013 Annual Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
NROC 2013 Annual Report NNaattuurree RReesseerrvvee ooff OOrraannggee CCoouunnttyy County of Orange Central/Coastal NCCP/HCP 2013 ANNUAL REPORT 2013 ANNUAL REPORT Nature Reserve of Orange County 15600 Sand Canyon Avenue Irvine, CA 92618 www.naturereserveoc.org Nature Reserve of Orange County ANNUAL REPORT 2013 Table of Contents BACKGROUND AND INTRODUCTION......................................................................................1 1.0 NROC ORGANIZATIONAL GOVERNANCE AND ANNUAL REPORT OVERVIEW ........... 1 1.1 Board of Directors Milestones in 2013 .................................................................... 1 1.2 Annual Report Format Revision ................................................................................ 2 2.0 NROC SCIENTIFIC PROGRAM STATUS AND WORK PLAN 2013-14 ............................. 6 2.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................6 2.2 Work Plan Table ....................................................................................................7 2.3 Project Descriptions ...............................................................................................8 2.4 Potential In Development Projects ........................................................................ 43 2.5 Habitat Restoration & Enhancement Summary Tables ......................................... 44 2.6 A 17-Year Retrospective ...................................................................................... 46 3.0 NROC CONSERVATION CUSTODIAL FUNDS ................................................................ 64 3.1 2013 Pacific Pocket Mouse Custodial Fund .......................................................... 64 3.2 2013 Cowbird Fund .............................................................................................. 64 4.0 RESERVE MANAGEMENT PLANS AND POLICIES ...................................................... 64 4.1 Fire Management Plan ......................................................................................... 64 4.2 Habitat Restoration and Enhancement Plan ......................................................... 65 4.3 Recreation Management Plan .............................................................................. 65 4.4 Grazing Management Plan ................................................................................... 65 5.0 IMPACTS TO CSS IN THE CENTRAL/COASTAL NCCP/HCP ......................................... 66 5.1 Authorized Take by Participating Landowners as Reported in 2013 ....................... 66 5.2 Take by Non-Participating Landowners – Mitigation Fee Option ............................ 66 6.0 ACCOUNTING OF FUNDS RECEIVED AND DISPERSED BY NROC............................. 66 7.0 BOUNDARY CHANGES/MINOR AMENDMENTS IN THE RESERVE SYSTEM ............... 67 8.0 RESERVE LANDOWNER/MANAGER PROGRESS REPORTS AND WORK PLANS...68 8.1 Crystal Cove State Park 8.2 CA Department of Fish and Wildlife Ecological Reserves 8.3 Orange County Parks 8.4 City of Irvine 8.5 City of Newport Beach 8.6 The Irvine Company 8.7 University of California, Irvine 8.8 Irvine Ranch Water District 8.9 Transportation Corridor Agencies 8.10 Orange County Waste and Recycling Acknowledgements The Nature Reserve of Orange County appreciates and thanks the reserve landowners and land managers whose hard work and collaboration makes a significant contribution to the health of the Reserve and this Annual Report. Nature Reserve of Orange County ANNUAL REPORT 2013 Sections: 1.0 - 7.0 Nature Reserve of Orange County BACKGROUND The Implementation Agreement for the County of Orange NCCP/HCP Central and Coastal Subregion specifies that an Annual Report be prepared each year to describe activities of the non-profit management corporation and of landowners and land managers within the reserve system. The annual report contains a progress report for the preceding year and a work plan for the following year. This report is being submitted to the US Fish and Wildlife Service and California Department of Fish and Wildlife to fulfill that requirement for the years 2013/2014. Guidelines provided by the Wildlife Agencies were used in the preparation of this report. INTRODUCTION The Nature Reserve of Orange County (NROC) is the 501(c)(3) non-profit corporation that was formed to manage the Natural Communities Conservation Plan/Habitat Conservation Plan (NCCP/HCP) for the Central/Coastal Subregion of Orange County. NROC’s mission is “To ensure the persistence of the reserve’s natural communities, including the full spectrum of native plant and animal species, through the protection, study and restoration of native habitats and natural processes.” Thirty-nine sensitive species are protected, including nine plant and 30 animal species. The primary vegetation type in the Reserve is coastal sage scrub, coexisting in an intricate mosaic of oak woodland, native grassland, chaparral, Tecate cypress and riparian communities. NROC helps coordinate the management activities of reserve landowners and managers in the 38,000-acre reserve system. Additionally, it conducts biological research and monitoring, and implements habitat restoration and enhancement programs in coordination with landowners and managers. The overall biological goal of the Reserve program is to conserve healthy, functioning ecosystems at a landscape level. This is accomplished through adaptive management, a flexible approach that is open to change based on new scientific information. 1.0 NROC ORGANIZATIONAL GOVERNANCE AND ANNUAL REPORT OVERVIEW 1.1 Board of Directors Milestones in 2013 March · The election of public at-large members was held in March, and new directors and alternates, representing environmental, business and recreation communities, are: Environment – Garry Brown, Director; Elisabeth Brown, PhD, Alternate Director Business – Jerry A. King, Director; Michael Recupero, Esq., Alternate Director Recreation – Thomas Eastman, Director; Harry Helling, Alternate Director · Board of Directors unanimously approved the NROC 2012 Annual Report and 2013 Work Plan for submission to the Wildlife Agencies. · President Mark Denny elevated the Land Managers Council to a Board Committee— Land Management Committee, chaired by Director Todd Lewis. June · The audited financial statement for fiscal year 2012 was approved by the board. The financial statement was found to be materially correct by the auditor, and received an unqualified opinion. · NROC Board established an Audit Committee. 1 September · NROC Board of Directors conducted a one-half day Strategic Plan Workshop to review and recommend changes to the December 20, 2012 approved plan. · NROC Science Coordinator, Milan Mitrovich, PhD, prepared a 17 year review of NROC Science and Land Management Project Funding December · NROC convened an independent Science Experts Panel to assist the organization in a review of past accomplishments, its current organizational capacity and role, prioritizing critical issues and threats facing the Reserve, and providing direction in establishing a five to ten year science vision. · NROC Board approved revised Strategic Plan and associated strategies, objectives and master calendar. · Brian Fisk, City of Irvine, was elected Vice President of the NROC Board. · The Board of Directors approved the fiscal year 2014 budget. 1.2 Annual Report Format Revision NROC has produced an Annual Report since 1997. Over the years the format and content have evolved, and the report has grown in size and complexity. Recently, NROC conducted a survey of members of its Board of Directors (which includes representatives of the Wildlife Agencies), land managers and key partners to gain insight to the current utility of the Annual Report, the amount of time various individual stakeholders spend in the preparation of the document, and recommendations of changes that would improve its value. Below is a table of NROC’s survey findings. Forty surveys were mailed. Twenty-four (60%) were returned completed: 15 (55.6%) from NROC Directors and Alternates, seven (100%) from NCCP/HCP land managers and two (33.3%) from selected key partners. Topline Summary · Significantly more Land Managers than NROC Directors/Alternates reported participating directly in the production and editing of the 2013 NROC Annual Report and 2014 Work Plan. · Responding Land Managers on average spent three times more time in the production and editing of the current year NROC Annual Report than NROC Directors/Alternates. · Slightly more than 50 percent of both responding NROC Directors/Alternates and Land Managers reported that last year’s (2012) Annual Report and Work Plan was unused or under-utilized as a resource during 2013. In an early attempt to respond to survey comments regarding improving the usefulness and readability of the Annual Report, NROC is testing format changes in its portion of this Annual Report and will coordinate with others to critique the modifications to determine which, if any, will be standardized for use in future reports and Timewhich and will beValue further Annual refined andReport tested. Survey of NROC Board of Directors, Land Managers and 2 Time and Value Annual Report Survey of NROC Board of Directors, Land Managers and Key Partners # Question NROC Director Land Manager Other Key or Alternate (n=7) Partner (n=2) (n=15) 1a Did you participate directly in the production Yes: 10 Yes: 6 Yes: 2 of any part of the 2013 (66.7%) (85.7%) (100%) NROC Annual Report/2014 Annual No: 5 No: 1 No: 0 Work Plan? (This (33.3%)
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Dissertation Submitted in Partial Satisfaction of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Biology
    LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY School of Science and Technology in conjunction with the Faculty of Graduate Studies ____________________ Factors Affecting Phytoplankton Biodiversity and Toxin Production by Tracey Magrann ____________________ A Dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Biology ____________________ June 2011 © 2011 Tracey Magrann All Rights Reserved Each person whose signature appears below certifies that this dissertation in his opinion is adequate, in scope and quality, as a dissertation for the degree Doctor of Philosophy. , Chairperson Stephen G. Dunbar, Associate Professor of Biology Danilo S. Boskovic, Assistant Professor of Biochemistry, School of Medicine H. Paul Buchheim, Professor of Geology William K. Hayes, Professor of Biology Kevin E. Nick, Associate Professor of Geology iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to express my deepest gratitude to Dr. Stephen G. Dunbar, who assisted with the majority of the editing and for his wonderful guidance throughout this research project, Dr. Danilo Boskovic for providing space in his laboratory, constructing data sheets, giving careful directions in proper water chemistry analysis techniques, and editing proficiency, Dr. Bill Hayes for his contribution in the statistics portion of this work, Dr. Martha Sutula for site selection and providing laboratory and field equipment, Dr. H. Paul Buchheim for contributing expertise in limnology, and Dr. Kevin Nick for his insightful editing contributions. I am also very thankful to those who provided grants and other funding which allowed this project to expand throughout five counties. The Southern California Coastal Waters Research Project (SCCWRP) funded the water chemistry analysis, and the toxin analysis was funded by grants from Marine Research Group (MRG) of Loma Linda University, the Southern California Academy of Sciences, Newport Bay Naturalists and Friends, El Dorado Audubon Society, Friends of Madrona Marsh, Sea and Sage Audubon Society, Blue Water Technologies, and Preserve Calavera.
    [Show full text]
  • Ron Yeo Papers
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/c82r3zpd No online items Ron Yeo Papers Aaron Manuel Leon Sherman Library and Gardens 614 Dahlia Ave. Corona del Mar, California 92625 (949) 673-1880 [email protected] http://www.slgardens.org/ 2019 Ron Yeo Papers 2019_5 1 Descriptive Summary Title: Ron Yeo Papers Dates: 1963-2005 Collection Number: 2019_5 Creator/Collector: Ron Yeo Extent: 17 archives boxes; 7 linear feet Repository: Sherman Library & Gardens Corona del Mar, California 92625 Abstract: Language of Material: English Access Open for research. Publication Rights Property rights to the physical object belong to the Sherman Library. Literary rights, including copyright, are retained by the creators and their heirs. It is the responsibility of the researcher to determine who holds the copyright and pursue the copyright owner or his or her heir for permission to publish where The Sherman Library does not hold the copyright. Preferred Citation Ron Yeo Papers. Sherman Library and Gardens Acquisition Information Ron Yeo donated these papers to Sherman Library in 2017 and 2019. Biographical Note Ron Yeo was born on June 17, 1933 in Los Angeles, California. He graduated from the University of Southern California with a Bachelor of Architecture in 1959. He was officially licensed in 1960 as an architect. In 1963, he founded Ron Yeo, Architect, Inc. With his office located in Corona del Mar, he worked on a variety of projects located in and around Orange County. In 1965, he was appointed to be on the board of directors for the University of California, Irvine’s “Project 21,” which had the goal to ensure that Orange County entered the 21st century with a well-planned area.
    [Show full text]
  • C Eatin Iable Blic Cce in Ppe Newp Tbay E Tbay
    C eatin iable blic cce in ppe Newp t Bay e t Bay ppe Newp t Bay Nat e e e ve and Ec l ical e e ve CONN E CH O C - E MEN O EN ONMEN L E GN - NG 2010 C eatin iable blic in ppe Newp t Bay e t Bay A Senior Project Presented to the Faculty of the Landscape Architecture Department of the University of California, Davis in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the Degree of Bachelors of Science in Landscape Architecture Accepted and Approved by Mark Francis, Faculty Senior Project Advisor Steve Greco, Faculty Committee Member Claire Napawan, Committee Member Dr. Deborah Elliott-Fisk, Committee Member eface The last mark I hope to make in our Landscape Architecture program is to show that a natural environment can co-exist in a reputably urbanized region. Southern California, specifically Orange County, is where I grew up and throughout the years, I have witnessed concrete lots and open spaces transform into shopping malls, car dealerships, housing tracts and small parks throughout the county. To visitors and those not native to Orange County, the notion that a natural environment still exists is very unlikely. However, when I was in third grade, I had the unique opportunity to visit an estuary called the Upper Newport Back Bay Nature Reserve located in Newport Beach. I learned the importance of tide habitats for plants and animals, how humans created endangered species, and several ways we could help save the Earth. It was a memorable field trip because it was my first hands-on experience in a delicate habitat, and even in my third grade mindset, I began to be more aware of how human actions affect the Earth.
    [Show full text]
  • Front Page Letters Calendars Archives Sign up Contact Us Stunewslaguna
    Front Page Letters Calendars Archives Sign Up Contact Us StuNewsLaguna Volume 4, Issue 16 | February 22, 2019 Search our site... 1 Search Police Files Arrest made in cold case murder of 11-year-old Linda O’Keefe, additional witnesses sought James Alan Neal, 72, of Colorado Springs, was arrested Tuesday, Feb. 19, in the Newport Beach cold case murder of 11-year-old Linda Ann O’Keefe from 1973. The Orange County District Attorney’s Office along with the Newport Beach Police NEWPORT Department announced at a joint press conference on Wednesday, Feb. 20 at 10 a.m. that BEACH James Alan Neal was identified as the suspect in the abduction, sexual molestation, and murder of 11-year-old Linda Ann O’Keefe, after a tireless and exhaustive investigation that Mist lasted for more than 45 years. Humidity: 81% Wind: 3.04 m/h 48.6°F MON TUE WED 48/48°F 49/57°F 52/58°F Click on photos for larger images Courtesy of OCDA and NBPD (L-R) James Alan Neal (now), James Alan Neal aka James Albert Layton Jr. (vintage photo) At the news conference, Orange County District Attorney Todd Spitzer said, “We believe he (Neal) did this beyond a reasonable doubt.” Neal was arrested Tuesday at 6:29 a.m. in “unremarkable” fashion. He is being held in Colorado and has yet to waive extradition. He will be charged with murder and two additional special circumstances, including kidnapping and lewd and lascivious acts. Click on photo for a larger image Courtesy of NBPD Linda O’Keefe, died July 1973, age 11 Spitzer said, “The significant arrest for the brutal sexual assault and murder of Linda O’Keefe is an affirmation to never give up on solving cold cases.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction 1 Executive Summary 2 Project Description 3 Environmental
    Introduction 1 Executive Summary 2 Project Description 3 Environmental Impact Analysis 4 Alternatives 5 Analysis of Long Term Effects 6 Effects Found Not to be Significant 7 Preparation Team 8 Organizations and Persons Consulted 9 1 Introduction 2 Executive Summary 3 Project Description 4 Environmental Impact Analysis 5 Alternatives 6 Analysis of Long Term Effects 7 Effects Found Not to be Significant 8 Preparation Team 9 References Aesthetics 4.1 This section discusses potential impacts to scenic vistas and visual resources in the planning area, and the potential for adverse changes in the visual character and quality to occur as a result of implementing the proposed land use changes and urban design policies. Potential impacts associated with light and glare are also addressed. During the scoping meeting held on November 30, 2015, attendees raised concerns regarding the potential for new development in certain districts and neighborhoods to conflict with the existing building character. In particular, concerns were raised about the potential for taller, higher-density development to be built in areas that historically have had only one- and two-story buildings. Additionally, several people stated that impacts related to shade and shadowing need to be addressed in the EIR. These concerns are addressed below under Impact 4.1.C. Existing Conditions The planning area is almost completely urbanized. Costa Mesa sits atop a plateau approximately one mile from the Pacific Ocean. The Pacific Ocean can be seen along the City’s western boundary, where the coastline creates a distinctive visual background. The eastern edge of the City affords some views of Upper Newport Bay.
    [Show full text]
  • Selected Geologic Literature on the California Continental Borderland and Adjacent Areas, to January 1, 1975
    Selected Geologic Literature on the California Continental Borderland and Adjacent Areas, To January 1, 1975 By Albert E. Roberts GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CIRCULAR 714 1975 United States Department of the Interior ROGERS C. B. MORTON, Secretary Geological Survey V. E. McKelvey, Director Free on application to U.S. Geological Survey, National Center, Reston, Va 22092 Contents INTRODUCTION ------------------------------------------------ 1 EXPLANATION OF BIBLIOGRAPHIC REFERENCES --------------------- 3 SERIAL LIST ------------------------------------------------- 4 REFERENCES BY AUTHOR Published reports -------------------------------------- 12 Published abstracts ------------------------------------ 75 Unpublished reports ------------------------------------ 85 SUBJECT INDEX ----------------------------------------------- 95 Illustrations Cover. Orthographic drawing of California Continental Borderland and vicinity by Tau Rho Alpha (1970) Figure 1. Index map of California Continental Borderland and vicinity ------------------------------------- 2 iii Selected Geologic Literature on the California Continental Borderland and Adiacent Areas, to January 1, 1975 By Albert E. Roberts INTRODUCTION Among the prospective areas of the United States for developing substantial new petroleum reserves is the California Continental Borderland. However, the likelihood of finding large supplies of petroleum in this submarine area is difficult to evaluate without detailed information on the bedrock of the sea floor. Altho~gh much information of this kind has been
    [Show full text]
  • Planning Areas.FH11
    APPENDIX A NOTICE OF PREPARATION/INITIAL STUDY/ NOP COMMENT LETTERS Notice of Preparation and Scoping Meeting for the Back Bay Landing Project Environmental Impact Report DATE: October 1, 2012 SUBJECT: Back Bay Landing Project - Notice of Preparation of an Environmental Impact Report and Notice of Public Scoping Meeting PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The Back Bay Landing project is a proposed integrated, mixed-use waterfront village on an approximately 7 acre portion of a 31.4 acre parcel located adjacent to the Upper Newport Bay in the City of Newport Beach. The majority of the project site (6.332 acres) is located immediately north of East Coast Highway between Bayside Drive and the Bayside Marina adjacent to the Upper Newport Bay. The balance of the project site (0.642-acres) is located under and immediately south of the East Coast Highway bridge. The project site is illustrated on the map below. The proposed project involves land use amendments to provide the legislative framework for future development of the site. Amendments to the General Plan and Coastal Land Use Plan are required to change the land use designations to a Mixed-Use Horizontal designation and a Planned Community Development Plan (PCDP) is proposed to establish appropriate zoning regulations and development standards for Parcel 3. The requested approvals will provide for a horizontally distributed mix of uses, which will include visitor-serving recreational and marine commercial retail, office, marine office, boat services, marine services, and enclosed dry stack boat storage along with a vertical and horizontal mix of multi-family residential over retail and multi-family residential flats, as regulated by the proposed Back Bay Landing PCDP.
    [Show full text]
  • CULTURAL RESOURCES Assessmevts
    APPENDIX D CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENTS March 05, 2013 Jaime Murillo, Associate Planner CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH 3300 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, CA 92663 Re: HISTORIC RESOURCES ASSESSMENT LETTER REPORT, NEWPORT BACK BAY Dear Mr. Murillo: This Historic Resources Assessment letter report, completed by PCR Services Corporation (PCR), documents and evaluates the federal, state, and local significance and eligibility of the properties located at Back Bay Landing Project Area, Newport Beach, Orange County, California. The Historic Resources Assessment letter report includes a discussion of the survey methods used, a brief historic context of the property and surrounding area, and the identification and evaluation of the subject property. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Back Bay Landing project waterfront village will be located on 6.974 acres in the City of Newport Beach (“City”) in Orange County, California. Subsequent to the requested legislative approvals, future development on-site would be regulated by the development standards and design guidelines established in the PCDP, which would allow for a mixed-use development with the maximum development limits. A future on-site mixed-use development project would be designed with a Coastal Mediterranean architectural theme. It is proposed that existing Orange County Sanitation District 5 Bay Bridge Station (Pump House) (1966) will be rehabilitated and the commercial storage garages on the eastern side of Parcel 3 (1961) will be demolished. RESEARCH AND FIELD METHODOLOGY The Historic Resource Assessment was conducted by PCR’s Historic Resources Division staff, Margarita J. Wuellner, Ph.D., Director of Historic Resources, Murray Miller, M. Arch., Principal Historic Preservation Planner, and Amanda Kainer, M.S., Assistant Architectural Historian, who meet and exceed the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualification Standards in history, historic architecture and architectural history.
    [Show full text]
  • Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project (Project No
    Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project (Project No. 5-67) RECIRCULATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT | JULY 2019 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT RECIRCULATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project Lead Agency: ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 Contact: Mr. Kevin Hadden Principal Staff Analyst 714.962.2411 Prepared by: MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL 5 Hutton Centre Drive, Suite 500 Santa Ana, California 92707 Contact: Mr. Alan Ashimine 949.472.3505 July 2019 JN 168975 This document is designed for double-sided printing to conserve natural resources. Recirculated Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1.0: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Project Location ............................................................................................................................ 1-1 1.2 Project Summary ........................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.3 Goals and Objectives ................................................................................................................... 1-2 1.4 Environmental Issues/Mitigation Summary ............................................................................. 1-2 1.5 Summary of Project Alternatives .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix a Notice of Preparation Part 2
    NATURAL RESOURCES AGENCY ARNOLD SCHWAR ZEN EGGER. GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION DIVISION OF OIL. GAS AND GEOTHERMAL RESOURCES 5816 Corporate A"t3nue • Suite 200 • CYPRESS. CAUFORNIA. 90630-4731 rHONE 714/816·6.S ~ 7 • FAX 714/816·6853 . WEBSlIE con~rvahO~~1\F _' BY P!ANI '. +__ ,,,.. !.lMENT March 24 , 2009 MAR Z5 2C~l Ms. Debby Linn, Contract Planner City of Newport Beach, Planning Department CnYJF Nt"Vv JI<I StACH 3300 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach. CA 92658 Subject: Notice of Preparation of a Program Environmental Impact Report for the Newport Banning Ranch Project. SCH 2009031061 Dear Ms. Linn: The Department of Conservation's Division of Oil , Gas, and Geothermal Resources (Division) has reviewed the above referenced project. We offer the following comments for your consideration, The Division is mandated by Section 3106 of the Public Resources Code (PRC) to supervise the drilling, operation, maintenance, and plugging and abandonment of wells for the purpose of preventing: (1) damage to life, health. property, and natural resources; (2) damage to underground and surface waters suitable for irrigation or domestic use; (3) loss of oil, gas, or reservoir energy; and (4) damage to oil and gas deposits by infiltrating water and other causes. Furthermore, the PRC vests in the State Oil and Gas Supervisor (Supervisor) the authority to regulate the manner of drilling, operation, maintenance, and abandonment of oil and gas wells so as to conserve, protect, and prevent waste of these resources, while at the same time encouraging operators to apply viable methods for the purpose of increasing the ultimate recovery of oil and gas.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix H Cultural Resources Report
    ___________________________________________________ APPENDIX H CULTURAL RESOURCES REPORT ___________________________________________________ This page intentionally left blank. CULTURAL RESOURCES RECONNAISSANCE FOR THE VILLAGE ENTRANCE PROJECT, LAGUNA BEACH, CALIFORNIA Prepared for Christopher A. Joseph & Associates 179 H. Street Petaluma, California 94952 Prepared by Joan C. Brown, M.A., RPA Stephen O’Neil, M.A. James W. Steely, M.S. SWCA ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS 23392 Madero, Suite L Mission Viejo, California 92691 (949) 770-8042 www.swca.com USGS 7.5-Minute Quadrangle Laguna Beach, California SWCA Project No. 10751-111 SWCA Cultural Resources Report Database No. 2006-200 April 2006 CULTURAL RESOURCES REPORT VILLAGES ENTRANCE PROJECT MANAGEMENT SUMMARY/ABSTRACT Purpose and Scope: Christopher A. Joseph & Associates contracted with SWCA Environmental Consultants to undertake cultural resources documentary research and a pedestrian reconnaissance as part of the California Environmental Quality Act review process in anticipation of the Village Entrance project. The services entailed a literature review of the study area including a 1-mile radius around the property, a historic evaluation of the building, and a pedestrian reconnaissance to determine if cultural resources are visible on the surface. This report documents the results of the cultural resources study. Dates of Investigation: The cultural resources literature search was completed January 19, 2006, and the cultural resources pedestrian reconnaissance was completed March 2, 2006, by SWCA Archaeologist Stephen O’Neil. This report was completed in April 2006. The historic study by Jim Steely was performed during April 2006. Findings of the Investigation: The literature review at the South Central Coastal Information Center, located at California State University, Fullerton, revealed that 11 cultural resources are recorded within a 1-mile radius of the current study area.
    [Show full text]
  • Newport Citizenry Were Invited to City Hall for the April 2 Presentation
    Debbie Linn, Contract Planner 10 April 2009 City ofNewport Beacb 3300 Newport Blvd. Newport Beach, Ca 92658. Re: BANNING DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL AND PUBLIC COMMENTS Dear Ms. Linn, This will acknowledge the only City sponsored informational meeting to discuss the impacts ofthe Banning Rancb "uber" development. Allor selected populations of Newport citizenry were invited to city hall for the April 2 presentation. Public conunents. objections and questions were invited to be in written form by April 17.2009. Fifteen (15) days are allowed to formally respond so that the Environmentallrnpact Report might consider valid public questions. However, the developers have had a year or two to freely access the City's departments with the developer's own professional staff. True, the developer has held a few infonnational meetings to make its case and cbann the public. The disparity in review time is very significant! Incidentally, the City's material handouts such as charts ofthe property to be developed, buildings or relative positions to existing residential areas are not provided. Perhaps the developer may cut a comer on full disclosure, but one would expect the city to fully divulge! Not even the city boundaries or main streets are shown. How can thoughtful studied objections be presented? We request an extension oftime for public input before the EIR is started, and the extension oftime to start from the date the public is provided more accurate details. Some wordy objections or viewpoints follow: Accepting the charge that the Newport Crest Development has created and been the 35 year forerunners to a long considered inferior view location in Newport we now find the "establishment" comes to capitalize on the areas potential at a great cost to us.
    [Show full text]