DOCSLIB.ORG

Criminal Law

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Criminal Law The Law Commission (LAW COM. No. 145) - CRIMINAL LAW OFFENCES AGAINST RELIGION AND PUBLIC WORSHIP Laid before Parliament by the Lord High Chancellor pursuant to section 3(2) of the Law Commissions Act 1965 Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 18 June 1985 LONDON HER MAJESTY’S STATIONERY OFFICE f4.90 net 442 The Law Commission was set up by section 1 of the Law Commissions Act 1965 for the purpose of promoting the reform of the law. The Commissioners are- The Honourable Mr. Justice Ralph Gibson , Chairman. Mr. Trevor M. Aldridge. Mr. Brian J. Davenport, Q.C. Professor Julian Farrand. Mrs. Brenda Hoggett. The Secretary of the Law Commission is Mr. J. G. H. Gasson, and its offices are at Conquest House, 37-38 John Street, Theobald’s Road, London WClN 2BQ. 11 OFFENCES AGAINST RELIGION AND PUBLIC WORSHIP CONTENTS Paragraphs Page PART I: INTRODUCTION ..... : .. 1.1-1.4 1 PART 11: BLASPHEMY AND BLASPHEMOUS LIBEL 2.1-2.57 3 A . What is blasphemy? ......... 2.1-2.2 3 B . The working paper and response to it .....2.3-2.16 4 1. The working paper .........2.3-2.5 4 2 . The response ...........2.6-2.16 5 (a) The character of the response .... 2.6-2.8 5 (b) The response favouring retention of an offence of blasphemy .......2.9-2.14 6 (c) The response favouring abolition without replacement .........2.15-2.16 9 C . Shortcomings in the present law ......2.17-2.18 9 D . What conduct is penalised only by the common law? 2.19 11 E . The arguments for a law of blasphemy reconsidered 2.20-2.53 12 1. The protection of religion and religious beliefs 2.23-2.25 13 2 . The protection of public order ......2.26-2.29 14 3 . The protection of society .......2.30-2.36 16 4 . The protection of religious feelings ....2.37-2.42 20 5 . Some further arguments considered ....2.43-2.47 23 6 . Possible new offences ........2.48-2.53 26 (a) Outraging religious feelings .....2.48-2.5 1 26 (b) Public display of offensive religious matter 2.52 28 (c) Inciting religious hatred ...... 2.53 28 F. Conclusions and recommendation .....2.54-2.57 28 PART 111: OFFENCES RELATING TO PUBLIC WORSHIP .............3.1-3.25 30 A . Introduction ........... 3.1-3.3 30 B . The present law .......... 3.4-3.13 31 1. Common law ........... 3.4 31 2 . Statute law ............3.5-3.13 31 C . The working paper proposals and response . 3.14-3.15 34 D . Are new offences needed? .......3.16-3.18 35 E . Possible new offences ........3.19-3.22 36 1. Disrupting services of religious worship ... 3.20 37 2 . Offensive behaviour in places of worship ...3.21-3.22 38 F . Abolitions and repeals ........3.23-3.25 39 1. Abolitions ........... 3.24 39 2 . Repeals ............. 3.25 39 ... U1 Paragraphs Page PART IV: SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS 4.1 40 NOTE OF DISSENT .......... 41 I APPENDIX: Draft Blasphemy Bill and Explanatory Notes ........... 46 I iv THE LAW COMMISSION CRIMINAL LAW OFFENCES AGAINST RELIGION AND PUBLIC WORSHIP To the Right Honourable the Lord Hailsham of St. Marylebone, C. H., Lord High Chancellor of Great Britain PART I INTRODUCTION 1.1 This report contains our final recommendations for abolishing or repeal- ing certain common law and old statutory offences in the field of offences relating to religion and public worship. The recommendations relate, in the first place, to offences against religion. In that context we recommend the abolition of the common law offences of blasphemy and blasphemous libel. In regard to offences relating to public worship, we recommend the abolition of certain common law offences concerned with disturbances to public worship. A draft Bill which would give effect to these recommendations is to be found in Appendix A. 1.2 Our work in this area commenced in the wake of the trial in July 1977 of the editor of Gay News' on a charge of blasphemous libel, the first such case to come to trial since 1922. After a preliminary invitation for views on the subject initiated through the correspondence columns of selected newspapers and journals, we published our working paper in April 1981containing provisional proposals for reform of the law. By this time, the Gay News case had come before the Court of Appeal and House of Lords.2 Substantial work on a report was delayed pending the disposal of proceedings in this case before the Euro- pean Commission of Human right^,^ which on 7 May 1982 declared the application made to be inadmissible. 1.3 This report takes account of the exceptionally heavy response to the provisional proposals in our working paper. The weight of that response related to the proposals made in regard to the law of blasphemy and it will be convenient to describe the nature of that response in Part I1 of this report, which deals with that subject. Part 111 deals with offences relating to distur- bances in places of worship and Part IV summarises our recommendations. 1.4 In this introduction it remains only to note, as we customarily do insour reports relating to substantive criminal offences, that our work is undertaken as R. v. Lemon, R. v. Gay News Ltd., CentralCriminal Court, 11 July 1977 (JudgeKing-Hamilton Q.C.). See [1979] Q.B. 10(C.A.) and [1979] A.C. 617 sub nom. Whitehouse v. Lemon, Whitehousev. Gay News Ltd. Gay News Ltd.and Another v. United Kingdom. Application No. 8710/79,5 E.H.R.R. 123. 1 part of our programme for codification of the criminal law. Such codification necessarily entails the abolition of the offences which exist by virtue only of the common law and, so far as may be necessary, the enactment of new statutory offences in their place. The process of abolition and replacement requires here, as it has elsewhere in our programme, consideration of the need for the common law offences proposed for abolition and of any new offences to replace them. These considerations are of particular pertinence in the context of blasphemy and blasphemous libel, where in ,substance the offences exist wholly by virtue of judicial decisions made over a period of more than three cent~ries.~ - The one offence-creating statute, the Blasphemy Act 1697, was repealed by the Criminal Law Act 1967, s.13 and Sched. 4, Pt. 1. Certain ancient statutory offences of heresy and the like, contained in the Sacrament Act 1547, the Act of Supremacy 1558 and the Act of Uniformity 1662, were repealed by the Statute Law (Repeals) Act 1969 and the Church of England (Worship and Doctrine) Measure 1974. 2 PART I1 BLASPHEMY AND BLASPHEMOUS LIBEL A. What is blasphemy? 2.1 There is no single, comprehensive definition of the common law offence of blasphemy and its written form of blasphemous libel, and none was offered by the House of Lords in the case of Whitehouse v. Lemon (“the Guy News case”).’ But the trial judge in that case said in the course of his summing up that blasphemous libel is committed if there is published any writing concerning God or Christ, the Christian religion, the Bible, or some sacred subject, using words which are scurrilous, abusive or offensive and which tend to vilify the Christian religion and therefore have a tendency to lead to a breach of the peace. And Lord Scarman in that case2 approved the definition in Stephen’s Digest of Criminal Law3 which differs only by omitting from the definition offered by the trial judge the reference to a tendency to lead to a breach of the peace; this, Lord Scarman said, was no more than a reminder of the character of the offence rather than an essential element of it.4 Both definitions empha- sise the strongly offensive character that material must possess in order for it to be penalised by the common law, which distinguishes the legal definition of blasphemy from its far broader dictionary meaning of any “impious or profane talk”.5 Having regard to the character of the response to our working paper which we describe below, it is worth emphasising here that this report is concerned only with the common law offence: it has no bearing upon and makes no recommendations affecting the legal position relating to what some may consider to be distasteful language in the media or elsewhere save in so far as that language may fall within the bounds of the offence of blasphemy as described above. 2.2 Our working paper contained a detailed examination of the history of this offence and of its constituent elements,6 which we do not repeat here. For present purposes it is sufficient to note, first, that it appears that the offence protects only the Christian religion, together with the rituals and doctrines of the Church of England.7 Secondly, it is now established that no mental element is required for commission of the offence other than an intention to publish the offending words.s Thirdly, there are statutory provisions which require the [1979] A.C. 617. * [1979] A.C. 617 at pp. 665-666. Article 214, 9th ed. (1950), which states- “Every publication is said to be blasphemous which contains any contemptuous, reviling, scurrilous or ludicrous matter relating to God, Jesus Christ, or the Bible, or the formularies of the Church of England as by law established. It is not blasphemous to speak or publish opinions hostile to the Christian religion, or to deny the existence of God, if the publication is couched in decent and temperate language.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bill Digest: Thirty-Seventh Amendment of the Constitution
    Bill Digest | Thirty-seventh Amendment of the Constitution-Blasphemy Bill 2018 1 Bill Digest Thirty-seventh Amendment of the Constitution (Repeal of offence of publication or utterance of blasphemous matter) Bill 2018 Bill No. 87 of 2018 Roni Buckley, Parliamentary Researcher (Law) Monday, 23 July 2018 Abstract The Thirty-seventh Amendment of the Constitution (Repeal of the offence of publication or utterance of blasphemous matter) Bill 2018 proposes the removal of the offence of blasphemy from the Constitution by way of referendum. Under the current framework the Constitution provides that the offence of blasphemy is punishable according to law. The Defamation Act 2009 defines the offence and provides that a person shall be liable upon conviction on indictment for a maximum fine of €25,000. This Digest sets out recent events and controversies relating to blasphemy; assesses its historical and legislative development as well as relevant case-law. Finally, the Digest provides a comparative analysis with European and international countries. Oireachtas Library & Research Service | Bill Digest 2 Contents Summary ........................................................................................................................................ 4 Proposed Amendment ................................................................................................................. 4 Definition of Blasphemy ............................................................................................................... 4 Reviews of the offence
    [Show full text]
  • New Religious Movements
    New Religious Movements New Religious Movements: Challenge and response is a searching and wide-ranging collection of essays on the contemporary phenomenon of new religions. The contributors to this volume are all established specialists in the sociology, theology, law, or the history of new minority movements. The primary focus is the response of the basic institutions of society to the challenge which new religious movements represent. The orientation of this volume is to examine the way in which new movements in general have affected modern society in areas such as economic organisation; the operation of the law; the role of the media; the relationship of so-called ‘cult’ membership to mental health; and the part which women have played in leading or supporting new movements. Specific instances of these relationships are illustrated by reference to many of the most prominent new religions – Hare Krishna, The Brahma Kumaris, The Unification Church, The Jesus Army, The Family’, The Church of Scientology, and Wicca. For students of religion or sociology, New Religious Movements is an invaluable source of information, an example of penetrating analysis, and a series of thought-provoking contributions to a debate which affects many areas of contemporary life in many parts of the world. Contributors: Eileen Barker, James Beckford, Anthony Bradney, Colin Campbell, George Chryssides, Peter Clarke, Paul Heelas, Massimo Introvigne, Lawrence Lilliston, Gordon Melton, Elizabeth Puttick, Gary Shepherd, Colin Slee, Frank Usarski, Bryan Wilson. Bryan Wilson is an Emeritus Fellow of All Souls College, Oxford. He is the author and editor of several books on sects and New Religious Movements.
    [Show full text]
  • Pearson Edexcel Level 3 Advanced GCE in History (9HI0)
    Pearson Edexcel Level 3 Advanced GCE in History (9HI0) Specification ubject O S t o f First certification 2017 q DR AFT u n a o l i t a c t a c r e d i Important: statement from Ofqual about this qualification This draft qualification has not yet been accredited by Ofqual. It is published to enable teachers to have early sight of our proposed approach to the Pearson Edexcel Level 3 Advanced GCE in History. Further changes may be required and no assurance can be given at this time that the proposed qualification will be made available in its current form, or that it will be accredited in time for first teaching in September 2015 and first award in summer 2017. Edexcel, BTEC and LCCI qualifications Edexcel, BTEC and LCCI qualifications are awarded by Pearson, the UK’s largest awarding body offering academic and vocational qualifications that are globally recognised and benchmarked. For further information, please visit our qualification websites at www.edexcel.com, www.btec.co.uk or www.lcci.org.uk. Alternatively, you can get in touch with us using the details on our contact us page at www.edexcel.com/contactus About Pearson Pearson is the world's leading learning company, with 40,000 employees in more than 70 countries working to help people of all ages to make measurable progress in their lives through learning. We put the learner at the centre of everything we do, because wherever learning flourishes, so do people. Find out more about how we can help you and your learners at: www.pearson.com/uk ubject O S t o f q DR AFT u n a o i l t a a c i t c r e d References to third party material made in this specification are made in good faith.
    [Show full text]
  • After Serrano Ethics, Theology and the Law of Blasphemy
    Law Text Culture Volume 5 Issue 1 Law & The Sacred Article 3 January 2000 After Serrano Ethics, Theology and the Law of Blasphemy M. Casey Catholic Diocese, Melbourne A. Fischer H. Ramsay Catholic Diocese, Melbourne Follow this and additional works at: https://ro.uow.edu.au/ltc Recommended Citation Casey, M.; Fischer, A.; and Ramsay, H., After Serrano Ethics, Theology and the Law of Blasphemy, Law Text Culture, 5, 2000. Available at:https://ro.uow.edu.au/ltc/vol5/iss1/3 Research Online is the open access institutional repository for the University of Wollongong. For further information contact the UOW Library: [email protected] After Serrano Ethics, Theology and the Law of Blasphemy Abstract In the latest academic apologia for the antics of bad boy photographer Andres Serrano, Damien Casey attempts to portray him as not only a great liberal artist, but as a great Christian theologian too. One suspects Serrano is laughing up his sleeve at the ease with which such 'postmodern' thinking can be grafted on to the support of his iconoclasm. Casey rehearses some of the standard liberal excuses -- though with no fresh argument -- and then settles down to some more novel points concerning theology, Scripture and society. We will give some treatment of his standard liberal case first, then turn ot Casey's more original contributions, and finally comment on the current state of the law regarding this issue. This journal article is available in Law Text Culture: https://ro.uow.edu.au/ltc/vol5/iss1/3 Law & The Sacred: After Serrano Ethics, Theology and the Law of Blasphemy Michael Casey, Anthony Fisher OP & Hayden Ramsay In the latest academic apologia for the antics of bad boy photographer Andres Serrano, Damien Casey attempts to portray him as not only a great liberal artist, but as a great Christian theologian too.
    [Show full text]
  • Crimes Act 1961
    Reprint as at 1 October 2012 Crimes Act 1961 Public Act 1961 No 43 Date of assent 1 November 1961 Commencement see section 1(2) Contents Page Title 23 1 Short Title, commencement, etc 23 2 Interpretation 24 3 Meaning of convicted on indictment 31 4 Meaning of ordinarily resident in New Zealand 31 Part 1 Jurisdiction 5 Application of Act 31 6 Persons not to be tried in respect of things done outside 32 New Zealand 7 Place of commission of offence 32 7A Extraterritorial jurisdiction in respect of certain offences 32 with transnational aspects 7B Attorney-General’s consent required where jurisdiction 34 claimed under section 7A 8 Jurisdiction in respect of crimes on ships or aircraft 35 beyond New Zealand Note Changes authorised by section 17C of the Acts and Regulations Publication Act 1989 have been made in this reprint. A general outline of these changes is set out in the notes at the end of this reprint, together with other explanatory material about this reprint. This Act is administered by the Ministry of Justice. 1 Reprinted as at Crimes Act 1961 1 October 2012 8A Jurisdiction in respect of certain persons with diplomatic 37 or consular immunity 9 Offences not to be punishable except under New Zealand 39 Acts 10 Offence under more than 1 enactment 39 10A Criminal enactments not to have retrospective effect 40 10B Period of limitation 40 11 Construction of other Acts 41 12 Summary jurisdiction 41 Part 2 Punishments 13 Powers of courts under other Acts not affected 41 Death [Repealed] 14 Form of sentence in capital cases [Repealed]
    [Show full text]
  • Criminal Law Act 1967 (C
    Criminal Law Act 1967 (c. 58) 1 SCHEDULE 4 – Repeals (Obsolete Crimes) Document Generated: 2021-04-04 Status: This version of this schedule contains provisions that are prospective. Changes to legislation: There are currently no known outstanding effects for the Criminal Law Act 1967, SCHEDULE 4. (See end of Document for details) SCHEDULES SCHEDULE 4 Section 13. REPEALS (OBSOLETE CRIMES) Modifications etc. (not altering text) C1 The text of S. 10(2), S. 13(2), Sch. 2 paras. 3, 4, 6, 10, 12(2), 13(1)(a)(c)(d), 14, Sch. 3 and Sch. 4 is in the form in which it was originally enacted: it was not reproduced in Statutes in Force and does not reflect any amendments or repeals which may have been made prior to 1.2.1991. PART I ACTS CREATING OFFENCES TO BE ABOLISHED Chapter Short Title Extent of Repeal 3 Edw. 1. The Statute of Westminster Chapter 25. the First. (Statutes of uncertain date — Statutum de Conspiratoribus. The whole Act. 20 Edw. 1). 28 Edw. 1. c. 11. (Champerty). The whole Chapter. 1 Edw. 3. Stat. 2 c. 14. (Maintenance). The whole Chapter. 1 Ric. 2. c. 4. (Maintenance) The whole Chapter. 16 Ric. 2. c. 5. The Statute of Praemunire The whole Chapter (this repeal extending to Northern Ireland). 24 Hen. 8. c. 12. The Ecclesiastical Appeals Section 2. Act 1532. Section 4, so far as unrepealed. 25 Hen. 8. c. 19. The Submission of the Clergy Section 5. Act 1533. The Appointment of Bishops Section 6. Act 1533. 25 Hen. 8. c.
    [Show full text]
  • Elizabeth Ii
    Statute Law (Repeals) Act 1969 CH. 52 ELIZABETH II 1969 CHAPTER 52 An Act to promote the reform of the statute law by the repeal, in accordance with recommendations of the Law Commission, of certain enactments which (except in so far as their effect is preserved) are no longer of practical utility, and by making other provision in connection with the repeal of those enactments. [22nd October 19691 BE IT ENACTED by the Queen's most Excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:- 1. The enactments mentioned in the Schedule to this Act are Repeal of hereby repealed to the extent specified in column 3 of the Schedule, enactments. 2.-(l) In proceedings by way of quare impedit commenced Advowsons. within six months of induction, judgment shall be given for the removal of an incumbent instituted to fill the vacancy, if he was instituted on a presentation made without title and is made a defendant to the proceedings. (2) Where the Crown presents to a benefice which is full of an incumbent, effect shall not be given to the presentation without judgment having been given for the removal of the incumbent in proceedings by way of quare impedit brought by or on behalf of the Crown. Subsection (1) above shall apply in relation to proceedings so brought whether or not they are commenced within the period of six months therein referred to. (3) The provisions of this section shall have effect in place of chapter 5 of the Statute of Westminster, the Second, chapter 10 of the statute of uncertain date concerning the King's prerogative and chapter 1 of 13 Ric.
    [Show full text]
  • The Church Act
    The Church Act: The expansion of Christianity or the imposition of moral enlightenment? David Stoneman A Thesis submitted as fulfilment of the requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, University of New England, Australia, 2011. Abstract The Church Act (1836) redefined and reinvigorated the religious environment in the emerging British colony of New South Wales, which profoundly impacted on its social and political development in a period of rapid population growth. It was a popular measure that has seen Governor Richard Bourke, its principal architect, be remembered as a provider of religious freedom. The simple motivation of the Act to expand Christianity and therefore morality has been complicated by the assertion that it assisted the expansion of a ‘new faith’ called moral enlightenment. This changes the implication of the Act and redefines the motives of the people responsible for its introduction, especially Bourke, by assuming that secular Enlightenment principles overrode Christian objectives. This has provided an ideological superstructure that has been used by some nationalist historians to present a picture of New South Wales colonial life that was fundamentally irreligious verging on atheistic. This has served to diminish the importance of religious thought and belief in the early development of Australia. This thesis argues that the Church Act was conceived to counter various forms of alternative belief and synchronised Christianity, ranging from plebeian ‘folk religion’ to heterodoxical, intellectual Protestantism. It encouraged orthodox Christianity by financially supporting the denominations that had cultural as well as spiritual connections to the majority of the population. The thesis concludes that the Church Act should be categorised as being a product of the ‘Age of Atonement’ not the imposition of moral enlightenment.
    [Show full text]
  • Canadian Blasphemy Law in Context: Press, Legislative, and Public Reactions Jeremy Patrick
    Annual Survey of International & Comparative Law Volume 16 | Issue 1 Article 9 2010 Canadian Blasphemy Law in Context: Press, Legislative, and Public Reactions Jeremy Patrick Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.ggu.edu/annlsurvey Part of the Other Law Commons Recommended Citation Patrick, Jeremy (2010) "Canadian Blasphemy Law in Context: Press, Legislative, and Public Reactions," Annual Survey of International & Comparative Law: Vol. 16: Iss. 1, Article 9. Available at: http://digitalcommons.law.ggu.edu/annlsurvey/vol16/iss1/9 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Academic Journals at GGU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Annual Survey of International & Comparative Law by an authorized administrator of GGU Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Patrick: Canadian Blasphemy Law CANADIAN BLASPHEMY LAW IN CONTEXT: PRESS, LEGISLATIVE, AND PUBLIC REACTIONS JEREMY PATRICK† I. INTRODUCTION Canada has always outlawed blasphemy. From the earliest days of the New France period, through the era of “Upper” and “Lower” Canada, past Confederation and the eventual enactment of the original Criminal Code, and still today, blasphemy has been considered a criminal offence in the Canadian legal system.1 However, this prohibition, whether expressed through common law or statute, has rarely been enforced through actual prosecution.2 In the 117 years since the Criminal Code was enacted, its prohibition on blasphemous libel has been enforced only five times in reported cases.3 A study of the Criminal Code provision and these five prosecutions provides valuable information on the legal treatment of blasphemy throughout Canadian history.
    [Show full text]
  • Measuring the World's Blasphemy Laws
    RESPECTING RIGHTS? Measuring the World’s Blasphemy Laws U.S. COMMISSION ON INTERNATIONAL RELIGIOUS FREEDOM A gavel is seen in a hearing room in Panama City April 7, 2016. REUTERS/Carlos Jasso UNITED STATES COMMISSION ON INTERNATIONAL RELIGIOUS FREEDOM RESPECTING RIGHTS? Measuring the World’s Blasphemy Laws By Joelle Fiss and Jocelyn Getgen Kestenbaum JULY 2017 WWW.USCIRF.GOV COMMISSIONERS Daniel Mark, Chairman Sandra Jolley, Vice Chair Kristina Arriaga de Bucholz, Vice Chair Tenzin Dorjee Clifford D. May Thomas J. Reese, S.J. John Ruskay Jackie Wolcott Erin D. Singshinsuk Executive Director PROFESSIONAL STAFF Dwight Bashir, Director of Research and Policy Elizabeth K. Cassidy, Director of International Law and Policy Judith E. Golub, Director of Congressional Affairs & Policy and Planning John D. Lawrence, Director of Communications Sahar Chaudhry, Senior Policy Analyst Elise Goss-Alexander, Researcher Andrew Kornbluth, Policy Analyst Tiffany Lynch, Senior Policy Analyst Tina L. Mufford, Senior Policy Analyst Jomana Qaddour, Policy Analyst Karen Banno, Office Manager Roy Haskins, Manager of Finance and Administration Travis Horne, Communications Specialist This report, containing data collected, coded, and analyzed as of June 2016, was overseen by Elizabeth K. Cassidy, J.D., LL.M, Director of International Law and Policy at the U.S. Commis- sion on International Religious Freedom. At USCIRF, Elizabeth is a subject matter expert on international and comparative law issues related to religious freedom as well as U.S. refugee and asylum policy.
    [Show full text]
  • Lectures on the Relation Between Law and Public Opinion in England During the Nineteenth Century (LF Ed.) [1917]
    The Online Library of Liberty A Project Of Liberty Fund, Inc. Albert Venn Dicey, Lectures on the Relation between Law and Public Opinion in England during the Nineteenth Century (LF ed.) [1917] The Online Library Of Liberty This E-Book (PDF format) is published by Liberty Fund, Inc., a private, non-profit, educational foundation established in 1960 to encourage study of the ideal of a society of free and responsible individuals. 2010 was the 50th anniversary year of the founding of Liberty Fund. It is part of the Online Library of Liberty web site http://oll.libertyfund.org, which was established in 2004 in order to further the educational goals of Liberty Fund, Inc. To find out more about the author or title, to use the site's powerful search engine, to see other titles in other formats (HTML, facsimile PDF), or to make use of the hundreds of essays, educational aids, and study guides, please visit the OLL web site. This title is also part of the Portable Library of Liberty DVD which contains over 1,000 books and quotes about liberty and power, and is available free of charge upon request. The cuneiform inscription that appears in the logo and serves as a design element in all Liberty Fund books and web sites is the earliest-known written appearance of the word “freedom” (amagi), or “liberty.” It is taken from a clay document written about 2300 B.C. in the Sumerian city-state of Lagash, in present day Iraq. To find out more about Liberty Fund, Inc., or the Online Library of Liberty Project, please contact the Director at [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • NSW Law Reform Commission REPORT 74 (1994)
    NSW Law Reform Commission: REPORT 74 (1994) - BLASPHEMY NSW Law Reform Commission REPORT 74 (1994) - BLASPHEMY Table of Contents Table of Contents....................................................................................................... 1 Terms of Reference and Participants......................................................................... 2 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................ 4 2. The Law of Blasphemy........................................................................................... 7 3. Other Jurisdictions................................................................................................ 14 4. Reform of the Law of Blasphemy ......................................................................... 22 Appendix A: Report of The Queen v William Lorando Jones ................................... 40 Appendix B: Submissions Received......................................................................... 44 NSW Law Reform Commission: REPORT 74 (1994) - BLASPHEMY Terms of Reference and Participants To the Hon John P Hannaford, MLC Attorney General for New South Wales Blasphemy Dear Attorney We make this final Report to the reference to this Commission dated 26 September 1991. The Hon Gordon J Samuels AC QC (Chairman) Professor Michael Tilbury (Commissioner) Professor Brent Fisse (Commissioner) November 1994 Terms of Reference On 26 September 1991, the Attorney General, the Hon Peter Collins QC MP, required the Commission
    [Show full text]