DOCSLIB.ORG

Commemorative Annual Report 2014

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Commemorative Annual Report 2014 27 Windsor Place tel +61 3 9999 3000 Melbourne Victoria 3000 email [email protected] www.hmstrust.org.au FRONT COVER Bentinck Island artists: Deborah Cheetham and Mirdidingkingathi Juwunda Darvell Hutchinson in front of Sally Gabori the tapestry, Dulka Warngiid (Land of All), Melbourne Warthadangathi Bijarrb Recital Centre Ethel Thomas Kuruwarriyingathi Bijarrb Paula Paul Dulka Warngiid (Land of All) 2007 Rayarriwarrtharrbayingat Amy Loogatha Commissioned for Melbourne Recital Centre by the Hugh Birrmuyingathi Maali Williamson Foundation and Netta Loogatha realising Dame Elisabeth Thunduyingathi Bijarrb Murdoch’s long-held wish, the May Moodoonuthi Australian Tapestry Workshop Wirrngajingathi Bijarrb transformed the painting Dawn Naranatjil Dulka Warngiid (Land of All), Australian Tapestry helen macpherson smith trust is an a significant contemporary Workshop weavers: Indigenous work held by the independent perpetual philanthropic trust National Gallery of Victoria, Amy Cornall into a monumental new Rebecca Moulton established by Helen Macpherson Schutt artwork. Cheryl Thurnton The 6.1 metre-long tapestry is a replica of the same- located (née Smith) in 1951. $105 million has been size collaborative work by Melbourne Recital Centre seven women artists from foyer distributed in grants since the Trust was Bentinck Island, in the Gulf of Carpentaria. They say of their medium work, “We each painted our Woollen cotton yarn established, with a wide range of Victorian country area which was special on cotton warp thread for us. Our painting is all of format charitable institutions and a diverse range of our country. That’s what the Woven tapestry title means – country, place, size land – land of all. We really 6.1 metres x 1.95 metres projects benefitting every year. enjoyed doing it as a group. We are very proud of our big VISION MISSION ValUES StrateGIC AIMS painting.” A strong, just Help build fair, Respect Building and sustainable creative and Integrity Enabling Victoria. resilient Victorian Stewardship Leading communities Collaboration through initiatives Accountability that promote positive change. TWO MILESTONES CELEBRATED > $100m in grants approved > Darvell M Hutchinson AM retires after 50 years This year we celebrate The Trust’s proud record Darvell Hutchinson’s these two significant of giving is showcased by extraordinary fifty-year milestones with a a listing of every grant commitment to the Trust 52-page commemorative approved along with case is recognised in a review of supplement at the front studies of selected projects his major contribution to of the Annual Report. that illustrate the breadth Australian philanthropy. and impact of the Trust’s grantmaking. A MILESTONE. HELEN MaCPHERSON SMITH’S LEGACY PASSES THE FIRST $100 MILLION IN GRANTS 1 The Royal Children’s Hospital Foundation | $286 University of Melbourne | $14,605 Vision Australia | $286 Walter & Eliza Hall Inst. of Medical Research | $20,000 1966 Church of England Diocesan | $1,000 Fairfield Hospital | $3,500 Mission to Seafarers Victoria | $150 Monash University | $15,000 Royal District Nursing Service | $177 RSPCA | $150 St Hilda’s College | $500 The Lost Dogs Home | $150 The Royal Children’s Hospital Foundation | $327 University of Melbourne | $8,000 Vision Australia | $300 Contents Helen Macpherson Smith 1967 Mission to Seafarers Victoria | $125 Mission to Seafarers Victoria | $35 Prince Henry’s Hospital - Melbourne | $14,814 Royal District Nursing Service | $125 Philanthropist Royal District Nursing Service | $74 RSPCA | $160 St Margaret’s School | $250 The Lost Dogs Home | $160 The Royal Children’s Hospital Foundation | $329 Vision Australia | $350 Helen Macpherson Smith was a very private woman who left few insights into the 1968 1955 part 1 Fairfield Hospital | $3,500 Anglican Aged Care Services Group | $1,802 type of person she was. Her close friends and relatives described her as thoughtful, Monash University | $10,000 Anglicare Victoria | $1,802 Monash University | $4,000 Berry Street | $1,802 kind and caring, and there would be little doubt that this spirit of generosity was 3 Helen Macpherson Smith: Philanthropist Monash University | $5,000 Brotherhood of St Laurence | $1,802 Outward Bound | $50 Burwood Boys’ Home | $1,802 central to her interest in philanthropy. Prince Henry’s Hospital - Melbourne | $5,000 Cancer Council Victoria | $1,802 Royal Women’s Hospital Foundation | $500 4 Passing the baton… Church of England Boys’ Society Farm | $1,802 St Margaret’s School | $250 Gordon Homes for Boys & Girls - Highett | $1,802 While the founding of the Helen Macpherson After William’s death Helen divided her time University of Melbourne | $5,000 Melbourne City Newsboys’ Society | $1,802 Smith Trust in 1951 remains her towering between Switzerland and southern France. She Vision Australia | $2,000 Melbourne Citymission | $1,802 7 Darvell M Hutchinson: Leader & Visionary Melbourne Home & Hospital for the Aged | $1,802 philanthropic achievement, she had been a died from pneumonia on 19 April 1951, at the 1969 Melbourne Legacy | $300 Melbourne Legacy | $200 Menzies | $1,802 generous supporter of many causes throughout Hotel Majestic in Cannes, aged 77. Despite 16 A 50-year contribution is honoured… Mission to Seafarers Victoria | $109 Mission to Seafarers Victoria | $585 her life. She was one of the first Life Members being a woman of means, inexplicably she was Monash University | $5,000 Presbyterian & Scots’ Church Children’s Aid Soc. | $1,802 Royal District Nursing Service | $109 Royal District Nursing Service | $1,802 of the Lost Dogs Home and gave financial buried in a pauper’s grave in Marseilles. Her 20 Snapshot of the Trust’s financial performance RSPCA | $109 Royal District Nursing Service | $585 support to the Royal District Nursing Service body was later cremated and her ashes scattered The Lost Dogs Home | $109 RSPCA | $585 The Royal Children’s Hospital Foundation | $368 Talbot Colony for Epileptics | $1,802 for 28 years. to the winds of the Mediterranean coast, as was University of Melbourne | $5,000 The Lost Dogs Home | $585 22 How we grant her wish. In 2001 an obelisk was erected in the Vision Australia | $368 The Royal Children’s Hospital Foundation | $1,319 Helen Macpherson Smith was born in Scotland The Salvation Army (Vic) Property Trust | $1,802 family plot at the Melbourne General Cemetery 1970 Try Boys’ Society | $1,802 on 17 April 1874 and moved to Melbourne as a permanent memorial. St Margaret’s School | $250 Victorian Society for Crippled Children | $1,802 with her family when she was aged six months. Victorian YMCA Youth & Community Services | $1,802 case studies 1971 Vision Australia | $1,319 Her extended family prospered in Australia; On her passing Helen left £275,000, the Cancer Council Victoria | $500 Wesley Mission Victoria | $1,802 the Macphersons in grazing and the Smiths as majority of her wealth, to establish a perpetual Mission to Seafarers Victoria | $163 1956 24 Education and vocational pathways Monash University | $10,000 timber merchants. Her grandfather, John philanthropic trust to benefit Victorian Monash University | $250 Melbourne Legacy | $300 Montefiore Homes for the Aged | $250 Mission to Seafarers Victoria | $24 Macpherson, was one of the pioneers of the charitable institutions. Launched as the Mt Alexander Hospital - Castlemaine | $250 Royal District Nursing Service | $24 30 Regional resilience Canberra district but his property, ‘Springbank’, Helen M. Schutt Trust, the name was changed Peninsula Health | $250 RSPCA | $24 Queen Victoria Medical Centre | $250 The Lost Dogs Home | $24 now lies largely under the waters of Lake Burley to the Helen Macpherson Smith Trust in 2001 Royal District Nursing Service | $161 The Royal Children’s Hospital Foundation | $198 36 Culture and heritage Griffin. Her uncle, John Macpherson, was to acknowledge the Macpherson and Smith RSPCA | $161 Vision Australia | $198 briefly the Premier of Victoria in 1869. families as the prime source of her legacy. St Vincent’s Institute of Medical Research | $500 1961 The Lost Dogs Home | $161 43 Land and environmental stewardship The Royal Children’s Hospital Foundation | $423 Mission to Seafarers Victoria | $105 In 1901, at the age of 27, Helen married Wisely, Helen’s will instructed her trustees to The Royal Victorian Eye And Ear Hospital | $500 Royal District Nursing Service | $105 University of Melbourne | $10,000 RSPCA | $105 barrister William John Schutt, but there were accumulate the major portion of the Trust’s Vision Australia | $423 The Lost Dogs Home | $105 48 Health advancement no children from the marriage. Schutt was a income for the first 21 years. By 1972, her Walter & Eliza Hall Inst. of Medical Research | $1,000 The Royal Children’s Hospital Foundation | $209 Wesley Mission Victoria | $500 Vision Australia | $209 successful lawyer and was appointed to the original bequest had grown to $3.95 million, YWCA Victoria | $250 bench of the Victorian Supreme Court in 1919. providing a much stronger base from which 1962 1972 Mission to Seafarers Victoria | $99 Helen left Australia for Europe in 1923 and larger and more effective grants could be made part 2 Adult Deaf Society (Vic) | $500 Royal District Nursing Service | $99 never returned. William remained in in the future. Apex Found. for Research into Mental Retardation | $100 RSPCA | $99 Bayley House | $500 The Lost Dogs Home | $99 Melbourne but made several trips to Europe 53 2014 Annual Report In 2014, 63 years after her death, the value Braille & Talking Book Library - South Yarra | $100 The Royal Children’s Hospital Foundation | $198 Brotherhood of St Laurence | $100 Vision Australia | $198 over the following decade and travelled of the Trust’s investments is over $100 million Calvary Health Care Bethlehem | $250 extensively with Helen. On a return voyage in Church of England Homes for Elderly People | $30,000 1964 and $105 million of grants have been approved. 1933 he suffered a fatal fall and was given a Family Life | $500 Melbourne Legacy | $200 Lifeline Melbourne | $50 Mercy Hospital for Women | $1,000 Though she lived a very private life, the legacy ship’s burial in the Red Sea.
Recommended publications
  • Australia's Role in the International Fight Against Drugs in Sport

    Australia's Role in the International Fight Against Drugs in Sport

    AUSTRALIA AND THE WORLD ANTI-DOPING CODE, 1999–2008 A STUDY OF THE ROLE OF THE AUSTRALIAN GOVERNMENT AND AUSTRALIAN PUBLIC SERVICE IN DRAFTING AND IMPLEMENTING THE WORLD ANTI-DOPING CODE Elise Parham June 2008 2 Contents Acknowledgments 5 About the Author 5 Introduction 7 PART ONE: Development of the World Anti-Doping Code and UNESCO International Convention against Doping in Sport Early Stages 13 IICGADS 21 World Anti-Doping Code 27 Copenhagen World Conference on Anti-Doping in Sport 31 UNESCO International Convention 35 PART TWO: Australian Implementation of the World Anti-Doping Code Australia Ratifies UNESCO Convention 43 Code-Compliance by Australian Sports 45 Establishment of ASADA 53 Australian Heads WADA 63 Conclusion 65 Appendices Appendix 1: Key Australian Participants in the Fight against Sports Doping 67 Appendix 2: Structure of WADA 69 Appendix 3: Elements of the World Anti-Doping Framework 71 Bibliography 73 3 4 Acknowledgments Thank you to everyone who contributed to this Study. As always, this story of policy development is a story of people. It is about how personalities work together to make ideas reality. A special thank you to Senator the Hon Rod Kemp, for being interested in the project and providing the resources and contacts necessary to bring the elements of this story together. For their generous cooperation, particular thanks must also go to Robert Crick, Alan Stretton, Kevin Thompson, Richard Ings, Bill Rowe and the Hon Jackie Kelly. Any errors or omissions are my own. About the Author This study was drafted while I was a researcher in Senator Kemp’s office and completing a Law and Economics combined degree at the Australian National University.
  • Melbourne Prize for Urban Sculpture 201 7

    Melbourne Prize for Urban Sculpture 201 7

    MELBOURNE PRIZE FOR URBAN SCULPTURE 2017 WHAT’S INSIDE OUR 2017 PARTNERS AND PATRONS 02 ABOUT THE FINALIST EXHIBITION 04 2017 PRIZE & AWARDS 06 GOVERNMENT PARTNERS 08 JUDGES 12 MELBOURNE PRIZE ALUMNI 16 MELBOURNE PRIZE FOR URBAN 18 SCULPTURE 2017 FINALISTS PUBLIC ARTWORK DESIGN CONCEPT 26 AWARD 2017 FINALISTS RURAL & REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT AWARD 2017 34 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT 38 ABOUT THE MELBOURNE PRIZE TRUST 40 This catalogue is designed by Founding Partner, Cornwell. Design visualisations courtesy of MR.P Studios. 1 THANK YOU TO OUR 2017 PARTNERS AND PATRONS Thank you to our 2017 partners and patrons Public Artwork Design Melbourne Prize for Rural & Regional Development Concept Award 2017 Government Partners Patrons Urban Sculpture 2017 Partners Award 2017 Partner – Crafting a City of Literature The Geoff and Helen Handbury Foundation MELBOURNE PRIZE FOR URBAN SCULPTURE 2017 Professional Development Award 2017 Partners Civic Choice Award 2017 Founding Partners Diana Gibson AO C H (Roger) Brookes Corporate Partners Print Partners Creative Partners Media Communications Exhibition & Event Partner Professional Services Exhibition Consultant Broadcast Partner Exhibition Signage & AV Wine + Awards Catering Partner Engineering Consultant IT Services Banners Trophies The Mighty Wonton Names24 Design by Cornwell and Mr P Studios Design by Cornwella foundingand MR.P supporter Studios a founding partner 2 The Melbourne Prize Trust is a Deductible Gift Recipient A MESSAGE FROM THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR ntroduction OF THE MELBOURNE I PRIZE TRUST The Melbourne Prize for Urban Urban Sculpture 2017. This rein- Sculpture 2017 & Awards is one forces the link between the idea of the most valuable prizes of its and the object, thus broadening kind in Australia.
  • 5281 VCH Ann Report FRONT Section FA1.Indd

    5281 VCH Ann Report FRONT Section FA1.Indd

    VISION CONTENTS The Foundation envisages a Chair’s Report 3 community where: Board of Governance 4 CEO’s Report 7 • health is a fundamental human right; Investments at a Glance 8 Highlights of an Active Year 10 • everyone shares in the responsibility Health Promotion Action 13 for promoting health; and Reducing Smoking 14 • everyone benefits from improved Increasing Physical Activity 18 health outcomes. Promoting Mental Health and Wellbeing 22 Addressing Health Inequalities 26 Other Areas of Health Promotion Action 30 MISSION Supporting Research 32 The Foundation’s mission is to build Raising Awareness Conference Papers and Presentations 36 the capabilities of organisations, Publications 38 communities and individuals in International Delegations 38 ways that: Major VicHealth Publications 38 Media Coverage 39 • change social, economic, cultural Policy Consultations and Submissions 40 and physical environments to Committees and Working Groups 41 improve health for all Victorias; and VicHealth Awards 43 Funded Projects 45 • strengthen the understanding and Financial Statements 66 the skills of individuals in ways that Organisational Chart 92 support their efforts to achieve and Board Appointed Advisory Panels 93 maintain health. Staff List 96 Photo: Promoting health is a powerful, cost-effective and efficient way to maintain a healthier community. www.vichealth.vic.gov.au 1 VICHEALTH CHAIR’S REPORT THIS YEAR, VICHEALTH AGAIN traction in the broader community, us the opportunity to strengthen PLAYED A LEAD ROLE IN beyond the research and health partnerships and understand some of THE PROMOTION OF PUBLIC sectors. The Walking School Bus, the issues affecting people across the HEALTH BY SUPPORTING AND a VicHealth initiative, for example, state.
  • Letter from Melbourne Is a Monthly Public Affairs Bulletin, a Simple Précis, Distilling and Interpreting Mother Nature

    Letter from Melbourne Is a Monthly Public Affairs Bulletin, a Simple Précis, Distilling and Interpreting Mother Nature

    SavingLETTER you time. A monthly newsletter distilling FROM public policy and government decisionsMELBOURNE which affect business opportunities in Australia and beyond. Saving you time. A monthly newsletter distilling public policy and government decisions which affect business opportunities in Australia and beyond. p11-14: Special Melbourne Opera insert Issue 161 Our New Year Edition 16 December 2010 to 13 January 2011 INSIDE Auditing the state’s affairs Auditor (VAGO) also busy Child care and mental health focus Human rights changes Labor leader no socialist. Myki musings. Decision imminent. Comrie leads Victorian floods Federal health challenge/changes And other big (regional) rail inquiry HealthSmart also in the news challenge Baillieu team appointments New water minister busy Windsor still in the news 16 DECEMBER 2010 to 13 JANUARY 2011 14 Collins Street EDITORIAL Melbourne, 3000 Victoria, Australia Our government warming up. P 03 9654 1300 Even some supporters of the Baillieu government have commented that it is getting off to a slow F 03 9654 1165 start. The fact is that all ministers need a chief of staff and specialist and other advisers in order to [email protected] properly interface with the civil service, as they apply their new policies and different administration www.letterfromcanberra.com.au emphases. These folk have to come from somewhere and the better they are, the longer it can take for them to leave their current employment wherever that might be and settle down into a government office in Melbourne. Editor Alistair Urquhart Some stakeholders in various industries are becoming frustrated, finding it difficult to get the Associate Editor Gabriel Phipps Subscription Manager Camilla Orr-Thomson interaction they need with a relevant minister.
  • Management Plan for Barmah-Millewa Forest

    Management Plan for Barmah-Millewa Forest

    Management Plan for Yorta Yorta Cultural Environmental Heritage Project Final Report Yorta Yorta Clans Group Inc. 11 January, 2003 All matters relating to the plan and its contents should be directed to the Yorta Yorta Clans Group as the appropriate corporate body that represents the Yorta Yorta people on all land, water and heritage matters pertaining to their traditional lands-see map attached: Figure 1. 2 Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION 6 2 METHODS 9 2.1 Terms of reference for study 9 2.2 Methodology 9 2.2.1 Cultural heritage methodology 9 2.2.2 Environmental heritage methodology 10 2.3 Identification of significant places and sites 10 3 BACKGROUND 14 3.1 Who are the Yorta Yorta? 14 3.2 Background of Yorta Yorta occupation 14 3.3 Native title claim 15 4 HERITAGE VALUES 17 4.1 Environmental heritage 17 4.1.1 Geomorphology 17 4.1.2 environmental variations 19 4.1.3 native vegetation 21 4.1.4 fauna 22 4.2 Natural and cultural heritage 25 4.2.1 Ethnographic sketch 25 4.2.1.1 social organisation 25 4.2.1.2 settlement 26 4.2.1.3 subsistence strategy and technology 27 4.2.1.4 plant procurement and processing 30 4.2.1.5 use of fire 32 4.2.1.6 exchange 32 4.2.1.7 ceremonial behabviour 33 4.2.1.8 mortuary behaviour 33 4.3 Archaeological heritage 34 4.3.1 human remains and their place in the landscape 34 4.3.2 settlement patterns 35 4.3.3 site inventory 37 4.4 Places of significance 39 4.4.1 places listed on the Register of the National Estate 39 4.4.2 Ramsar listed places 41 4.4.3 Heritage Rivers 41 4.4.4 Key regions 42 4.4.5 Additional cultural sites of special significance to the Yorta Yorta 43 5 THREATS TO YORTA YORTA ENVIRONMENTAL AND CULTURAL HERITAGE 48 5.1 Overview of issues 48 5.2 Changes in water regime 49 5.3 Grazing by domestic stock 50 5.4 Timber harvesting 51 3 5.5 Destruction of cultural sites 52 6 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PROTECTION OF OUR HERITAGE 53 6.1 General management structure proposed for the protection of Yorta Yorta natural and cultural heritage 53 61.1.
  • Ministerial Staff Under the Howard Government: Problem, Solution Or Black Hole?

    Ministerial Staff Under the Howard Government: Problem, Solution Or Black Hole?

    Ministerial Staff Under the Howard Government: Problem, Solution or Black Hole? Author Tiernan, Anne-Maree Published 2005 Thesis Type Thesis (PhD Doctorate) School Department of Politics and Public Policy DOI https://doi.org/10.25904/1912/3587 Copyright Statement The author owns the copyright in this thesis, unless stated otherwise. Downloaded from http://hdl.handle.net/10072/367746 Griffith Research Online https://research-repository.griffith.edu.au Ministerial Staff under the Howard Government: Problem, Solution or Black Hole? Anne-Maree Tiernan BA (Australian National University) BComm (Hons) (Griffith University) Department of Politics and Public Policy, Griffith University Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy November 2004 Abstract This thesis traces the development of the ministerial staffing system in Australian Commonwealth government from 1972 to the present. It explores four aspects of its contemporary operations that are potentially problematic. These are: the accountability of ministerial staff, their conduct and behaviour, the adequacy of current arrangements for managing and controlling the staff, and their fit within a Westminster-style political system. In the thirty years since its formal introduction by the Whitlam government, the ministerial staffing system has evolved to become a powerful new political institution within the Australian core executive. Its growing importance is reflected in the significant growth in ministerial staff numbers, in their increasing seniority and status, and in the progressive expansion of their role and influence. There is now broad acceptance that ministerial staff play necessary and legitimate roles, assisting overloaded ministers to cope with the unrelenting demands of their jobs. However, recent controversies involving ministerial staff indicate that concerns persist about their accountability, about their role and conduct, and about their impact on the system of advice and support to ministers and prime ministers.
  • Ministerial Careers and Accountability in the Australian Commonwealth Government / Edited by Keith Dowding and Chris Lewis

    Ministerial Careers and Accountability in the Australian Commonwealth Government / Edited by Keith Dowding and Chris Lewis

    AND MINISTERIAL CAREERS ACCOUNTABILITYIN THE AUSTRALIAN COMMONWEALTH GOVERNMENT AND MINISTERIAL CAREERS ACCOUNTABILITYIN THE AUSTRALIAN COMMONWEALTH GOVERNMENT Edited by Keith Dowding and Chris Lewis Published by ANU E Press The Australian National University Canberra ACT 0200, Australia Email: [email protected] This title is also available online at http://epress.anu.edu.au National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Title: Ministerial careers and accountability in the Australian Commonwealth government / edited by Keith Dowding and Chris Lewis. ISBN: 9781922144003 (pbk.) 9781922144010 (ebook) Series: ANZSOG series Notes: Includes bibliographical references. Subjects: Politicians--Australia. Politicians--Australia--Ethical behavior. Political ethics--Australia. Politicians--Australia--Public opinion. Australia--Politics and government. Australia--Politics and government--Public opinion. Other Authors/Contributors: Dowding, Keith M. Lewis, Chris. Dewey Number: 324.220994 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. Cover design and layout by ANU E Press Printed by Griffin Press This edition © 2012 ANU E Press Contents 1. Hiring, Firing, Roles and Responsibilities. 1 Keith Dowding and Chris Lewis 2. Ministers as Ministries and the Logic of their Collective Action . 15 John Wanna 3. Predicting Cabinet Ministers: A psychological approach ..... 35 Michael Dalvean 4. Democratic Ambivalence? Ministerial attitudes to party and parliamentary scrutiny ........................... 67 James Walter 5. Ministerial Accountability to Parliament ................ 95 Phil Larkin 6. The Pattern of Forced Exits from the Ministry ........... 115 Keith Dowding, Chris Lewis and Adam Packer 7. Ministers and Scandals .........................
  • Regional Councils of ACFE

    Regional Councils of ACFE

    October 2007 Jacinta Allan MP Minister for Skills and Workforce Participation Level 36 121 Exhibition Street Melbourne 3000 Dear Minister, On behalf of the Adult, Community and Further Education (ACFE) Board, I submit the ACFE Board’s annual report for the year ending 30 June 2007, as required by the Financial Management Act 1994 and the Adult Community and Further Education Act 1991. Over the past 12 months the ACFE Board has continued to guide and direct the implementation of the directions outlined in the 2004 Ministerial Statement, Future Directions for Adult Community Education in Victoria. In this third year of implementation of the initiatives outlined in the Statement, much has been achieved in broadening the role of ACE, enhancing the quality and extent of delivery to recognised priority learner groups and ensuring that ACE provision continues to be sustainable. Statistical analysis of training in the ACE sector in 2006 shows that 71% of activity is in accredited programs, 45% of all training is in vocational programs, 25% in literacy and numeracy programs and 14% in employment skills programs. The outcomes for learners and the wider community of ACE participation have been the focus of two major research projects which were completed during the year - the ACE Longitudinal Study and Setting the Scene. The three year study of ACE learners tracked learners and showed that 63% of those studying in ACE who were unemployed in 2004 were employed in 2006. Participation in volunteering activity increased for all students whatever their labour market status from 27.4% in 2004 to 37% in 2006.
  • Australian Indigenous Petitions

    Australian Indigenous Petitions

    Australian Indigenous Petitions: Emergence and Negotiations of Indigenous Authorship and Writings Chiara Gamboz Dissertation Submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of New South Wales School of Arts and Media Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences October 2012 ORIGINALITY STATEMENT 'l hereby declare that this submission is my own work and to the best of my knowledge it contains no materials previously published or written by another person, or substantial proportions of material which have been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma at UNSW or any other educational institution, except where due acknowledgement is made in the thesis. Any contribution made to the research by others, with whom I have worked at UNSW or elsewhere, is explicitly acknowledged in the thesis. I also declare that the intellectual content of this thesis is the product of my own work, except to the extent that assistance from others in the proiect's design and conception or in style, presentation and linguistic expression is acknowledged.' Signed 5 o/z COPYRIGHT STATEMENT 'l hereby grant the University of New South Wales or its agents the right to archive and to make available my thesis or digsertation in whole or part in the Univercity libraries in all forms of media, now or here after known, subject to the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968. I retain all proprietary rights, such as patent rights. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis or dissertiation.
  • Introduction and Methodology

    Introduction and Methodology

    ‘NOT ONE IOTA’: THE YORTA YORTA STRUGGLE FOR LAND JUSTICE Submitted by Wayne Roderick Atkinson BA (Hons) La Trobe University A thesis submitted in total fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Law and Legal Studies Faculty of Law and Management La Trobe University Victoria 3086 Australia November 2000 1 Contents Summary of Thesis vi Statement of Authorship vii Acknowledgements vii Abbreviations x Table of Figures x Preface ix Thesis Context ix Thesis Aims x The Study Area x Terminology xii Structure of Thesis xiii Chapter 1: Introduction and Methodology 1 1.1 Indigenous Equality in Land 2 1.2 Measures to Enhance Equality in Land 2 1.3 Indigenous Epistemology 4 1.3.1 Inclusion of Indigenous People 5 1.4 Holistic Approach 7 1.5 Action Based Research 8 1.6 Evidentiary Materials 8 1.6.1 Ethnographic Material and Indigenous Knowledge as Evidence 9 1.6.2 Continuity of Laws and Customs 11 1.6.3 Anthropological Issues 1 2 1.7 Conclusion 13 Chapter 2: Yorta Yorta Occupation 14 2.1 Introduction 14 2.2 Clarifying Misconceptions of Aboriginality 14 2.3 Indigenous Occupation 15 2.4 Timeline of Occupation 16 2.5 Change and Adaption Revisited 18 2.5.1 Responding to Change 19 2.6 Nature and Diversity of Yorta Yorta Land 20 2.6.1 Water 20 2.6.2 Food Sources 21 2.6.3 Living Patterns 21 2.7 Traditional Land Management Practices 22 2.7.1 Use of Fire 23 2.8 Aboriginal Sites as Evidence of Occupation 23 2.9 Material Evidence 24 2 2.10 Anthropological Evidence 25 2.11 Linguistic Evidence 27 2.12 Social Organisation 28
  • Fed Square Pty Ltd Annual Report 2 0 1 9 - 2 0 2 0 Traditional Owner Acknowledgement

    Fed Square Pty Ltd Annual Report 2 0 1 9 - 2 0 2 0 Traditional Owner Acknowledgement

    FED SQUARE PTY LTD ANNUAL REPORT 2 0 1 9 - 2 0 2 0 TRADITIONAL OWNER ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Fed Square proudly acknowledges that Federation Square is situated on the traditional lands of the Boon Wurrung and Woiwurrung peoples of the Kulin nation and pays respect to their Elders past and present. We acknowledge Aboriginal people as Australia’s first people and as the Traditional Owners and custodians of the land and water on which we rely. We recognise and value the ongoing contribution of Aboriginal people and communities to Victorian life and how this enriches us. We embrace the spirit of reconciliation, working towards the equality of outcomes and ensuring an equal voice. CONTENTS FED SQUARE ANNUAL REPORT 2019 - 2020 About Fed Square 3 Fed Square’s Purpose 4 Vision 4 Mission 4 Values 4 Service Goal 5 Message from Chair and CEO 6 About Fed Square 10 Corporate Governance 10 Fed Square Ptd Ltd Functional Structure 11 Fed Square’s Board 12 The Year’s Activity 16 Strategic Imperatives 17 Enhance Fed Square’s reputation as a globally recognised place for 1. 18 meaningful, visitor centred experiences Grow the Fed Square Family exponentially, by connecting people to the 2. 28 enduring power of community 3. Ensure a sustainable future for Fed Square 32 Build a social enterprise culture that is engaged, aligned and committed to 4. 36 delivering the Corporate Plan 2019-2022 The Year Ahead 38 5 Year Financial Summary 42 Key Performance Indicators 44 Statement of Corporate Governance 46 CONTENTS Directors’ Report 52 Financial Report 56 Contact Information 122 PAGE 1 Enjoying the Australian Open on the Digital Facade.
  • 2012 Victorian Architecture Awards | Architectureau 2012 Victorian Architecture Awards

    2012 Victorian Architecture Awards | Architectureau 2012 Victorian Architecture Awards

    2017­5­15 2012 Victorian Architecture Awards | ArchitectureAU 2012 Victorian Architecture Awards Awards | Words Shelley Penn The Royal Children’s Hospital by Billard Leece Partnership and Bates Smart. Image: John Gollings The 2012 Victorian Architecture Awards were announced at a presentation dinner on 29 June, held at Crown Palladium in Melbourne. Jury comment The 2012 Victorian state awards program has seen a dramatic rise in the number of entries from previous years. The years 2010 and 2011 saw about a 1 percent growth, yet this year there was a 21 percent increase — we received a total of 235 entries. Significant jumps in the categories of Heritage, Residential Alterations and Additions, Residential Multiple and Urban Design were somewhat countered by lowered numbers in Commercial and New Public Architecture — a sign of the times perhaps. Despite economic uncertainty, however, Victorian architects are continuing to deliver outstanding work. Together, the fifty­seven awards and commendations hint, through their breadth and exceptional quality, at the enormous scope of architecture’s contribution to Victorian society and culture. Each entry, from the smallest private intervention to the larger civic projects, reveals the generosity of spirit, innovation and tenacity that underpin excellent architecture. All of the architects who entered projects, who put their work under the glare of peer evaluation and thereby gave us all a glimpse of the great things underway in Victorian architecture, are sincerely thanked. I also thank the jurors, who have contributed substantially to this year’s awards through their time and rigorous consideration — a contribution that is essential to the credibility and distinction that characterize the Institute’s awards programs.