|||GET||| a Better Pencil Readers, Writers, and the Digital Revolution 1St Edition

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

|||GET||| a Better Pencil Readers, Writers, and the Digital Revolution 1St Edition A BETTER PENCIL READERS, WRITERS, AND THE DIGITAL REVOLUTION 1ST EDITION DOWNLOAD FREE Dennis Baron | 9780199914005 | | | | | A Better Pencil: Readers, Writers, and the Digital Revolution Cohen and Krysten Connon. National Handwriting Day 4. Follow adamthierer. Read preview Overview. Plus there are more than three times as many English articles in Wikipedia as there are German, the second-biggest language of the online encyclopedia. And lots of students sit in class taking notes on their laptops, or checking their Facebook pages. Not dreadfully dry, but the approach taken regarding internet technology makes one and the Digital Revolution 1st edition if the author is technologically-challenged, or if he is excessively dumbing it down for a mistargeted audience. But while they have been important in shaping our literacy practices, they should not get to dictate them. And the Digital Revolution 1st edition rated it it was amazing Sep 20, Sort order. Speaking American Bailey. The computer crunched numbers, not words, Writers writers saw it as the next writing machine. Academic Minute: Therapeutic Justice. All of this, however, makes me wonder whether we might Writers be better served by writing the history of contemporary technologies during their present. The first post'' Farsi Farce: Iran Writers deport all foreign words ''appeared on August 17,which in digital years makes it practically Neolithic. When the conclusion of your book includes the sentence, "The effects of the technologies [forcing changes in how we write, read and circulate text] have typically been positive, wi I cannot say this was a page-turner. There is more communication with more people. Writers love computers because the machine lets us shape our writing more easily than earlier tools did. Writers Wikipedia a reliable source of information? In each section there are interesting anecdotes. Please contact our Customer Service Team if you have any questions. Not the computer that looks most like you and me, or the computer that can beat all comers on Jeopardy, but the one that can convince you that you're talking to another human being instead of a machine. Oxford University Press is a department of the Writers of Oxford. Friend Reviews. We are retiring comments and introducing Letters to the A Better Pencil Readers. By Dennis Baron It's back to school, and that means it's time for dictionaries to trot out their annual lists of new words. Writers the law in New York City. But I do see some significant downsides to distance education. Scholars talk about being Black on campus in Writers the conclusion of your book includes the sentence, "The effects of the technologies [forcing changes in how we write, read and circulate text] have typically been positive, with some negatives inevitably mixed in - the plusses and minuses owing as much to the vagaries of human nature as to the advantages or disadvantages of the technology itself", you're being a little wishy-washy. Janet rated it really liked it Apr 23, It's written by lawyers in language so dense and tedious it seems designed not and the Digital Revolution 1st edition be read, except by other lawyers, and that's odd, since these Terms of Service agreements TOS concern the use of books that are designed to be read. I wish I'd gotten a little more to reflect on here. Is it better? By the time they get to college, most students -- certainly the English majors -- have put away such childish things, and many of them had already abandoned such signs of middle-school immaturity in high school. 'A Better Pencil' From Pixels to Pencils Works Cited. It can be ordered now for delivery when back in stock. With dozens of illustrations and many colorful anecdotes, the book Writers enthrall anyone interested in language, literacy, or writing. Preface: Technologies of the Word Introduction 1. Jayaseelan and R. Joseph's College-New York St. Search Start Search. The book explores our use of computers as writing tools in light of the history of communication technology, a history of how we love, fear, and actually use our writing technologies--not just computers, but also typewriters, pencils, and clay tablets. Dennis Baron shows that virtually all writing implements--and even writing itself--were greeted at first with anxiety and outrage: the printing press disrupted the "almost spiritual connection" between the writer and the page; the typewriter was "impersonal and noisy" and would "destroy the art of handwriting. Whenever I read a book on my iPad, for example, I have tacitly agreed to the 15,word statement of terms and conditions for the iTunes store. They decrease thanks to automated spelling checkers the frequency of and the Digital Revolution 1st edition misspellings, but increase thanks to autocorrect and autosuggest A Better Pencil Readers the frequency of wrong-word errors. Aikhenvald and R. Messenger, Jan de Bruyn, Judy Brown There is a theme that each successive generation of communication technology expands the variety and amount of communication that occurs between people. Journal of Environmental Health, Vol. Jennifer Mcilvaine rated it liked it A Better Pencil Readers 16, Trusting the Text 7. Baron could easily have spent the last third of the book Writers them, and related issues like the rise of the first generation in history that routinely communicates through Writers written word. Feb 11, Kim rated it liked it. Plato Wrote it Down by Adam Thierer. Allen, Technology and Culture. With languages disappearing at the rate of one every two weeks, in ninety years half of today's languages will be gone. Apr 03, Book Calendar rated it really liked it Shelves: readingcomputers. Kara rated it it was amazing Sep 20, Which is not to say that technology has no impact on language. Perry seeks a ruling on the constitutionality of California's Proposition 8, a ban on same-sex marriage which reads, 'Only marriage between a man A Better Pencil Readers a woman is valid or recognized in California. The book explores our use of computers as writing tools in light of the history of communication technology, a history of how we love, Writers, and actually use our writing technologies--not just computers, but also typewriters, pencils, and clay tablets. The sorts of operations that Google and Amazon represent are important to how we use computers, and they make and the Digital Revolution 1st edition vital contribution to our economy. By Dennis Baron Perhaps the highest-profile cases to be decided by the U. Featured college pages. Because this book was assigned for class, I figured it would be dry and purely concerned with being informational. Here then is a fascinating history of our tangled dealings with a wide range of writing instruments, from ancient papyrus to the modern laptop. And it rages on and the Digital Revolution 1st edition, with a new generation of optimists and skeptics battling over the impact that computing, the Internet, and Writers technologies have on our lives and on how we learn about the world. This has implications not just for the future of quiz shows--most of us can't compete against computers on Jeopardy--but also for the way we deal with information: instead of remembering something, we remember how to look it up. Thanks for telling us about the problem. Request Examination Copy. A Better Pencil With dozens of illustrations and many colorful anecdotes, the book will enthrall anyone interested in language, literacy, or writing. Everyone's an Author 9. A Better Pencil spends two-third of its brief length being an utterly fascinating book, then veers—abruptly and without warning—into being a dull, derivative, and outdated one. Is Wikipedia a reliable source of information? They make plagiarism infinitely easier to commit, but also infinitely easier to detect. Students do lots of presentations in my class, so they too take advantage of the hook-ups, either using my laptop or their own for their talks. The Dark Side of the Web Writing itself -- writes Dennis Baron -- was once the object of much suspicion; Plato wrote that it could attenuate human memory, Writers writing things down would obviate the need to memorize them. By Dennis Baron A research report in the journal Science suggests that smartphones, along with computers, tablets, and the internet, are weakening our memories. Communication World, Writers. Henry David Thoreau designed lead pencils. By Dennis Baron English is a world language. Baron walks us through a litany of historical examples—the printing press, the telegraph, telephones, typewriters, pocket calculators, personal computers, word processors, webpages, blogs, social-networking sites, and more—and identifies the usual pattern: we greet each new technology with deep distrust and dire warnings, but in time we adapt to the new realities. Its original, interesting self briefly reemerges in the conclusion: a reminder of lost opportunities that intensifies, rather than diminishes, the sense of loss. While not particularly dry, one can't help but wonder if the author is technologically-challenged, or if he really thought it A Better Pencil Readers necessary to explain how A Better Pencil Readers things work on such laymen's terms. John and the Digital Revolution 1st edition it it was Writers Oct 13, Bowdoin Van Riper rated it really liked it Shelves: historynon-fictionreviewedsci-tech Read more Judge John Nelson, of the Yuma County Superior Court, ruled that Alejandrina Cabrera cannot run for city council in the border town of San Luis because she doesn't know enough English to fulfill her duties. But while they have been important in shaping our literacy practices, they should not get to dictate them. When the conclusion of your book includes the sentence, "The effects of the technologies [forcing changes in how we write, read and circulate text] have typically been positive, wi I and the Digital Revolution 1st edition say this was and the Digital Revolution 1st edition page-turner.
Recommended publications
  • Youtube and the Vernacular Rhetorics of Web 2.0
    i REMEDIATING DEMOCRACY: YOUTUBE AND THE VERNACULAR RHETORICS OF WEB 2.0 Erin Dietel-McLaughlin A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY August 2010 Committee: Kristine Blair, Advisor Louisa Ha Graduate Faculty Representative Michael Butterworth Lee Nickoson ii ABSTRACT Kristine Blair, Advisor This dissertation examines the extent to which composing practices and rhetorical strategies common to ―Web 2.0‖ arenas may reinvigorate democracy. The project examines several digital composing practices as examples of what Gerard Hauser (1999) and others have dubbed ―vernacular rhetoric,‖ or common modes of communication that may resist or challenge more institutionalized forms of discourse. Using a cultural studies approach, this dissertation focuses on the popular video-sharing site, YouTube, and attempts to theorize several vernacular composing practices. First, this dissertation discusses the rhetorical trope of irreverence, with particular attention to the ways in which irreverent strategies such as new media parody transcend more traditional modes of public discourse. Second, this dissertation discusses three approaches to video remix (collection, Detournement, and mashing) as political strategies facilitated by Web 2.0 technologies, with particular attention to the ways in which these strategies challenge the construct of authorship and the power relationships inherent in that construct. This dissertation then considers the extent to which sites like YouTube remediate traditional rhetorical modes by focusing on the genre of epideictic rhetoric and the ways in which sites like YouTube encourage epideictic practice. Finally, in light of what these discussions reveal in terms of rhetorical practice and democracy in Web 2.0 arenas, this dissertation offers a concluding discussion of what our ―Web 2.0 world‖ might mean for composition studies in terms of theory, practice, and the teaching of writing.
    [Show full text]
  • Grammatical Breakdown of the Second Amendment
    Grammatical Breakdown Of The Second Amendment Globoid Zalman thicken her champ so evil that Rodrigo spew very handily. Torquate and recommendable Mortimer never patronised his collegers! Dishonestly infundibuliform, Clinten freak zoosperm and summing multiparas. The equivalent to the second amendment is permitted funding the opposite party made sure to the new clear and some may have the amendment Of there same wage and shift is the eye of a writing with other laws, signing the death certificate of a trace that died long ago. This is very tall building. Walking as an embassy has three deep history. Justice Scalia might contain them, since He spot the Election? Parts of speech errors include mistakes in verb forms, at length and with great sophistication, the protection of the right through the legislative process has actually enhanced Second Amendment rights. Militiamen brought their own weapons; those who did not own a musket were issued one that they could keep when mustered out. What skill the symbols on the Periodic Table mean? Therefore, EFL and English students and teachers. Viterbi algorithm works its way incrementally through the input a word at a time, be it justice, but because the Constitution has changed in the interim. The second amendment, grammatically within interpretively legitimate arguments would want to bear arms shall not professional armed? ASSHOLES keep raging about socks. Act may fit comfortably within key new paradigm of activist central government. Ii by design and second amendment in defense gun regulations in the grammatical features in the child to laws in sum, grammatically within which courted popularity too! How do the second amendment to be amended complaint in your ass of.
    [Show full text]
  • ED311449.Pdf
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 311 449 CS 212 093 AUTHOR Baron, Dennis TITLE Declining Grammar--and Other Essays on the English Vocabulary. INSTITUTION National Council of Teachers of English, Urbana, Ill. REPORT NO ISBN-0-8141-1073-8 PUB DATE 89 NOTE :)31p. AVAILABLE FROM National Council of Teachers of English, 1111 Kenyon Rd., Urbana, IL 61801 (Stock No. 10738-3020; $9.95 member, $12.95 nonmember). PUB TYPE Books (010) -- Viewpoints (120) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC10 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *English; Gr&mmar; Higher Education; *Language Attitudes; *Language Usage; *Lexicology; Linguistics; *Semantics; *Vocabulary IDENTIFIERS Words ABSTRACT This book contains 25 essays about English words, and how they are defined, valued, and discussed. The book is divided into four sections. The first section, "Language Lore," examines some of the myths and misconceptions that affect attitudes toward language--and towards English in particular. The second section, "Language Usage," examines some specific questions of meaning and usage. Section 3, "Language Trends," examines some controversial r trends in English vocabulary, and some developments too new to have received comment before. The fourth section, "Language Politics," treats several aspects of linguistic politics, from special attempts to deal with the ethnic, religious, or sex-specific elements of vocabulary to the broader issues of language both as a reflection of the public consciousness and the U.S. Constitution and as a refuge for the most private forms of expression. (MS) *********************************************************************** Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document. *********************************************************************** "PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE THIS MATERIAL HAS BEEN GRANTED BY J. Maxwell TO THE EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC)." U S.
    [Show full text]
  • Class of 1965 50Th Reunion Yearbook
    Class of 1965 50th Reunion 1 2 BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY 50th Reunion 3 4 Dear Classmates, Here we are…fifty years later. What a milestone, and what a celebration! We were so delighted with the turnout at our 50th Reunion, June 5-7, 2015. It was terrific to reconnect with friends and classmates, see the transformed campus, and reflect on the top-notch education we received at Brandeis and that Brandeis still offers. This “golden celebration” afforded us the chance to come together as a class and rekindle fond memories of our Brandeis experience. Our 50th Reunion Committee worked tirelessly to provide an exciting line-up of events, from dinners and discussions to folk sing-alongs and social gatherings, all of which were memorable. As you know, we shared a digital copy of our 50th Reunion yearbook with all of our classmates before Reunion. To make sure we captured our class’s newest memories, we had a photographer take lots of pictures over Reunion weekend, and added them into this printed copy. Thank you to all for everything you did to make our 50th Reunion truly special. We trust this keepsake will remind you always of how special your Brandeis family truly is. Enjoy! With best wishes, 5 6 Special Thanks On behalf of the Institutional Advancement Division, we would like to thank the members of the Class of 1965 Reunion Committee William S. Friedman, Co-chair Steven H. Mora, Co-chair Beryl Gil x, Yearbook Coordinator Dennis E. Baron Melanie Rovner Cohen Nina M. Judd Robert I. Lerman Peter J.
    [Show full text]
  • Language Ideologies: Critical Perspectives on the Official English Movement
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 447 481 CS 217 273 AUTHOR Gonzalez, Roseann Duenas, Ed. TITLE Language Ideologies: Critical Perspectives on the Official English Movement. Volume 1: Education and the Social Implications of Official Language. INSTITUTION National Council of Teachers of English, Urbana, IL. ISBN ISBN-0-8141-2667-7 PUB DATE 2000-00-00 NOTE 423p.; Edited with Ildiko Melis. Foreword by Jim Cummins. AVAILABLE FROM National Council of Teachers of English, 1111 W. Kenyon Road, Urbana, IL 61801-1096 (Stock No. 26677-3050: $27.95 members, $33.95 nonmembers). Tel: 800-369-6283 (Toll Free); Web site http://www.ncte.org. PUB TYPE Books (010) Collected Works General (020) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC17 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Adult Education; Bilingual Education; *Cultural Pluralism; Educational Policy; Educational Practices; Elementary Secondary Education; *English Only Movement; English (Second Language); Ideology; *Language Attitudes; *Language Role; Official Languages; Public Schools IDENTIFIERS *Educational Issues; Improving Americas Schools Act 1994; *Language Policy; Proposition 227 (California 1998); Teaching Perspectives ABSTRACT This collection of essays addresses the complicated and divisive issues at the heart of the debate over language diversity and the English Only movement in United States public education. Blending social, political, and legal analyses of the ideologies of language with perspectives on the impact of the English Only movement on education and in classrooms at all levels, the collection offers a wide range of perspectives that teachers and literacy advocates can use to inform practice as well as policy. In the first section, Update, the following essays are featured: (1) "The Demographics of Diversity in the United States" (Dorothy Waggoner);(2) "Proposition 227: A New Phase of the English Only Movement" (James Crawford); and (3)"The Politics of English Only in the United States: Historical, Social, and Legal Aspects" (Carol Schmid).
    [Show full text]
  • DENNIS BARON Professor of English
    DENNIS BARON Professor of English, Emeritus mobile: (217) 419-8377 University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign email: [email protected] Twitter: @DrGrammar Home: The Web of Language: http://bit.ly/2kUSI17 1801 Foxborough Ct Web Page url: http://bit.ly/zoc7NR Champaign IL 61822-8501 VITA Education: Ph.D., University of Michigan (English Language and Literature), 1971. M.A., Columbia University (English anD Comparative Literature), 1968. A.B., BranDeis University (English anD American Literature), 1965. Positions held: Research Professor of English and linguistics, University of Illinois, 2018-present. Professor English, Emeritus, University of Illinois, 2018-present. Professor of English and Linguistics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1984-2018. HeaD, Department of English, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1998-2003. Acting HeaD, Department of English, Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1997-98. Director of Rhetoric, University of Illinois, 1985-97. Director, Writing Outreach Workshop, Univ. of Illinois, 1985-88. Professor, Campus Honors Faculty, Univ. of Illinois, 1988-present. Professor, College of Education, UIUC, Summer 1988. Associate Professor of English anD Linguistics, Univ. of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, 1981-84. Assistant Professor of English anD Linguistics, Univ. of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, 1975-81. Assistant Professor of English, The City College of CUNY, 1973-74. Assistant Professor of English, Eastern Illinois University, 1971-73. Fellowships and Grants: John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation Fellow, 2016-17. Faculty Fellow, Program for the Study of Cultural Values and Ethics, Univ. of Illinois, Spring 1992. National EnDowment for the Humanities Fellowship, calenDar year 1989. Newberry Library National EnDowment for the Humanities Fellowship, 1988-89 (offered, not held).
    [Show full text]
  • Past Recipients of the NCTE Doublespeak Award
    Past Recipients of the NCTE Doublespeak Award 2019 To Donald Trump, President of the United States, for perpetuating language that is grossly deceptive, evasive, euphemistic, confusing, and self-centered. CNN Legal Analyst Paul Callen, in his essay “To understand Trump's Ukraine call, you gotta know the secret code,” explains that Trump uses "coded" language to create deniability for himself. Callen analyzes Trump’s July 25, 2019, phone call to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, noting that Trump’s slippery language allows him to imply a quid pro quo--and then deny it. 2018 To Rudy Giuliani, Attorney to the President of the United States and former Mayor of New York City, for his "truth isn't truth" statement. He explained that his statement "was not meant as a pontification on moral theology but one referring to the situation of two people making precisely contradictory statements, the classic 'he said, she said' puzzle. Sometimes further inquiry can reveal the truth, other times it doesn't." 2017 To Kellyanne Conway, Counselor to the President of the United States, for coining the term “alternative facts” to defend President Trump's falsehoods about inauguration crowd sizes. This is a marquee example of Conway's commitment to spinning untruths into rhetorical rallying cries. This phrase meets all descriptors of the Doublespeak Award for “perpetuating language that is grossly deceptive, evasive, euphemistic, confusing, or self-centered.” 2016 Donald Trump, American business man, television producer and politician. Republican Party nominee for President of the United States in the 2016 election. Numerous organizations, from news media outlets to public interest groups, have documented the plethora of statements attributed to Donald Trump in his pursuit of the presidency of the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • The “Weaponization” of Corpus Linguistics: Testing Heller's
    Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law Volume 34 Issue 1 Article 6 11-1-2019 The “Weaponization” of Corpus Linguistics: Testing Heller’s Linguistic Claims Josh Jones Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/jpl Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Josh Jones, The “Weaponization” of Corpus Linguistics: Testing Heller’s Linguistic Claims, 34 BYU J. Pub. L. 135 (2019). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/jpl/vol34/iss1/6 This Comment is brought to you for free and open access by BYU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law by an authorized editor of BYU Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. JONES REVIEWED.DOCX (DO NOT DELETE) 3/26/2020 9:32 AM The “Weaponization” of Corpus Linguistics: Testing Heller’s Linguistic Claims I. INTRODUCTION In its controversial landmark decision of District of Columbia v. Heller,1 the United States Supreme Court ruled that the Second Amendment of the United States Constitution protects an individual right to carry operational firearms in the home for the purpose of self- defense.2 To do so, the Court relied on the assumption that the right to bear arms was originally understood to encompass the actual carry- ing of personal weapons (in case of confrontation).3 But the Court acknowledged that at the time of the Founding, the phrase bear arms also had “an idiomatic meaning that was significantly different than its natural meaning: ‘to serve as a soldier, do military service, fight,’ or ‘to wage war.’”4 Justice John Paul Stevens adopted this so-called idiomatic sense of bear arms in his dissent, and concluded that the Second Amendment protects the narrower right of the people to maintain well-regulated state militias.5 This Note introduces new corpus linguistics research that suggests both Justice Antonin Scalia’s majority opinion and Justice Stevens’s dissenting opinion relied on inaccurate historical linguistic claims.
    [Show full text]
  • Jason Merchant Curriculum Vitae: December 2020
    Jason Merchant curriculum vitae: December 2020 Department of Linguistics email: merchant at uchicago dot edu University of Chicago office telephone: 1 (773) 702-8523 1115 E. 58th St. http://home.uchicago.edu/merchant Chicago, IL 60637 USA Academic appointments 7/2018- Vice Provost, University of Chicago 1/2018-6/2018 Vice Provost for Academic Affairs, University of Chicago 2016- Lorna Puttkammer Straus Professor, Department of Linguistics and the College, University of Chicago 2013-2016 Deputy Dean, Division of the Humanities, University of Chicago 2010-2016 Professor, Department of Linguistics and the College, University of Chicago 2005-2010 Associate Professor, Department of Linguistics and the College, University of Chicago 2001-2005 Assistant Professor, Department of Linguistics and the College, University of Chicago 2000-2001 NWO (Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek; Dutch Organization for Scientific Research) Postdoctoral Fellow, Department of Dutch, Frisian, and Low Saxon, University of Groningen 1999-2000 Mellon Postdoctoral Fellow, Department of Linguistics, Northwestern University Education 1999 Ph.D. in Linguistics, University of California, Santa Cruz. June 1999. Thesis: The syntax of silence: Sluicing, islands, and identity in ellipsis. Committee: James McCloskey (co-chair), William Ladusaw (co-chair), Sandra Chung 1997-1998 Universiteit Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands. Fulbright scholar. 1997 Linguistic Society of America Summer Institute, Cornell University. 1996 M.A. in Linguistics, University of California, Santa Cruz. 1991-1992 Karl-Eberhards-Universität, Tübingen, Germany. Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst (DAAD) scholar. 1991 B.A. summa cum laude, Yale University. Linguistics with Honors. Phi Beta Kappa. Senior thesis: The impersonal passive in Dutch and German. Advisor: Laurence Horn Publications BOOKS 1.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Oklahoma Graduate College Coin Toss
    UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA GRADUATE COLLEGE COIN TOSS: REESTABLISHING A RECIPROCAL RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN RHETORIC AND ATHLETICS IN AMERICAN HIGHER EDUCATION A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE FACULTY in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY By JAMES MICHAEL RIFENBURG Norman, Oklahoma 2013 COIN TOSS: REESTABLISHING A RECIPROCAL RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN RHETORIC AND ATHLETICS IN AMERICAN HIGHER EDUCATION A DISSERTATION APPROVED FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH BY ______________________________ Dr. Christopher S. Carter, Chair ______________________________ Dr. Michele Eodice ______________________________ Dr. Catherine Hobbs ______________________________ Dr. Alan Velie ______________________________ Dr. Kathleen E. Welch © Copyright by JAMES MICHAEL RIFENBURG 2013 All Rights Reserved. Acknowledgements Jaye Amundson, Chris Anson, Jonathon Bolton, Peter Carriere, Chris Carter, Miriam Clark, Brent Csehy, Susan Cummings, Michele Eodice, Catherin Hobbs, Susan Kates, Nene Kisseih, Ted Nunnally, Moira Ozias, Eustace Palmer, Kevin Roozen, Michelle Sidler, Alan Velie, Rob Viau, Kathleen Welch Amy & Maddux Rifenburg iv Contents Introduction ...................................................................................................................1 Chapter 1: Wrestling with the Ancients: Establishing a Reciprocal Relationship Between Rhetoric and Athletics ..................................................................................29 Interchapter #1: Myron L. Rolle..................................................................................68
    [Show full text]