DOCSLIB.ORG

Russell Group Universities Are a Prominent UK and International Industry in Their Own Right

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Russell Group Universities Are a Prominent UK and International Industry in Their Own Right The Russell Group of Universities www.russellgroup.ac.uk +44 (0)20 3816 1300 [email protected] @russellgroup The Russell Group represents 24 leading UK universities which are committed to maintaining the very best research, an outstanding teaching and learning experience and unrivalled links with business and the public sector. Our research-intensive, world-class Russell Group universities are all universities play an important part unique institutions, each with its own in the intellectual life of the UK and history and ethos, but they share some have huge social, economic and distinguishing characteristics. cultural impacts locally, across the UK and around the globe. Russell Group universities: Welcome • Lead in pioneering, excellent • Are responsible for ground-breaking research and innovation inventions and discoveries • Produce excellent research on a • Compete on an international stage grand scale, across a broad range of to attract the brightest minds from disciplines, generating huge impact around the world to study, research through critical mass and quality and teach • Provide an outstanding student • Produce the most distinguished experience for both undergraduates contributors to society and postgraduates, where teaching • Provide the vast majority of medical is enhanced by world-class research research and education in the UK and facilities • Play a key role in their local • Work with major multinationals communities as well as SMEs and start-up companies to drive cutting-edge innovation 3 Our universities are found in all four Our universities offer a wide range nations and in every major city of of courses: each university offers on the UK. They are large, complex average more than 350 courses at organisations with an average undergraduate level. annual income of £688 million; for other UK universities the average is Russell Group universities collaborate £132 million. Their multiple income with the NHS to educate over 80% streams include competitively- of the UK’s medical graduates. Our won research funding, as well as universities play a leading role in grants and contracts from the EU, advancing our understanding of charities, industry, endowments illness and disease, and our research and investments. makes a direct contribution to improving patient outcomes. In 2015-16, each Russell Group university competitively won an Four of the top ten universities in the average of £185 million in research world are Russell Group institutions. grants and contracts, including: Furthermore, 15 Russell Group universities feature in the top 100 • An average of £40 million in grants and all 24 are in the top 250, and contracts from UK-based according to the QS World University charities Rankings for 2018. • An average of £25 million in grants and contracts from the EU Russell Group universities operate • An average of £10 million in grants globally, attracting students with top and contracts from UK industry grades and academic staff from many different countries, but they also have Furthermore, Russell Group a strong role and influence within their universities attracted an average regional and local communities. of £19 million each in endowment and investment income. Russell Group universities The average number of The ratio of students to teach on average over staff employed is academic staff is around 25,000 7,100 7 :1 students compared to an compared to a non-Russell at Russell Group universities average of 12,000 at non- Group average of 1,700 compared to 14:1 at non- Russell Group universities Russell Group universities in the UK 4 Building prosperity Russell Group universities are a prominent UK and international industry in their own right: • They have a total economic output • The average annual capital spend in of over £32 billion per annum, 2015-16 of Russell Group universities which represents 44% of the total was £92 million; for other UK higher economic output for the whole UK education institutions the average university sector (of which Russell was £17 million. Group universities comprise just 15%). • Capital investment projects by • They support over 300,000 jobs Russell Group universities between UK-wide. 2012-13 and 2016-17 are expected to • They are a major UK export industry, support more than 98,500 UK jobs, generating overseas earnings of including around 37,800 temporary over £4 billion per annum. jobs during the construction period, around 45,000 permanent operational jobs and almost 15,700 permanent jobs supported by the wider catalytic impact of the activity undertaken in the new facilities. 5 Leaders in pioneering research & innovation Russell Group universities are world The UK research base is highly leaders in research and innovation. productive and has a global reputation They not only produce excellent for excellence: with less than 1% of the Russell Group research on a grand scale, across world’s population and just 4% of the a broad range of disciplines, but world’s researchers, the UK earns 12% universities award they also have the critical mass of international citations and 16% 60% of all doctorates of excellent research to generate of the most cited papers – of which huge impact, link the UK into nearly three-quarters were produced in the UK. global knowledge networks, attract by Russell Group researchers. (source: SciVal) investment and exploit technological breakthroughs for economic success. Russell Group universities lead the They provide the vast majority of world in pioneering research across medical research and education in a range of disciplines, which benefits the UK. the economy, creates technological breakthroughs and improves quality of life. High concentrations of research excellence across The UK is second disciplines are a foundation for innovative, interdisciplinary research only to Switzerland collaborations that are key to solving in the world, and global challenges. ahead of the US, for the quality of its scientific research institutions. 6 The 24 Russell Group universities constitute 15% of higher education institutions in the UK, yet they account for a much higher proportion of all funding competitively-won by UK universities: 76%of research grant and 70%of all international grants 71%of EU research grants contract income (£4.45 billion) and contracts from outside and contracts awarded the EU (£307 million) (over £600 million) 78%of total income from the 83%of research funding 68%of the total quality-related UK Research Councils from UK charities research funding allocated (almost £1.5 billion) (over £954 million) by the UK Funding Councils (around £1.3 billion) 7 The UK leads Europe in winning grants from the European Research Council (ERC) – and Russell Group universities alone host a higher proportion of ERC grants than the whole of Germany or France. Proportion of ERC grants Russell Group hosted in different countries Other HEIs 25% 20% 4% 15% 10% 17% 17% 12% 5% 9% 6% 6% 5% 5% 3% 3% 0% UK Italy Israel Spain France Sweden Belgium Germany Switzerland Netherlands 8 While Russell Group universities make up 15% of UK higher education institutions, the proportion of research which is ‘world- leading’ at Russell Group universities is almost double that at other UK universities. Other HEIs Russell Group 9 Driving innovation Commercialising research Home to brilliant academics Russell Group universities have The brightest and the best minds from • Peter Higgs, Edinburgh, Physics a proven track record of turning across the globe have found a home 2013 “for the theoretical discovery world-leading research into at Russell Group universities, including of a mechanism that contributes to innovative products and services. nearly 200 Nobel Prize winning our understanding of the origin of academics. Most recently… mass of subatomic particles” In 2015-16: • Christopher A. Pissarides, LSE, • John O’Keefe, UCL, Physiology or • Our universities generated over Economics 2010 “for analysis of Medicine 2014 “for discoveries of £86 million in intellectual property markets with search frictions” cells that constitute a positioning income, 49% of the total generated • Andre Geim and Konstantin system in the brain” by UK universities. Novoselov, Manchester, Physics In 2014, Simon Donaldson of Imperial • The estimated turnover from 2010 “for groundbreaking College London won one of the companies spun out from Russell experiments regarding the two- inaugural Breakthrough Prizes in Group universities was over dimensional material graphene” Mathematics, John B. Pendry also £644 million. • Venkatraman Ramakrishnan, of Imperial College London won a Cambridge, Chemistry 2009 • The 495 active spin-outs from Kavli Prize for Nanoscience and Martin “for studies of the structure Russell Group universities accounted Hairer from the University of Warwick and function of the ribosome” for 59% of those which survived for won a Fields Medal. John Hardy three years or more. • Jean-Marie Gustave Le Clézio, of University College London won Bristol alumnus, Literature 2008 as a Breakthrough Prize in Life Sciences Academics at Russell Group institutions “author of new departures, poetic in 2015. are more likely to have taken out a adventure and sensual ecstasy, patent, licensed their research to a explorer of a humanity beyond company or formed a spin-out than and below the reigning civilization” academics at other UK institutions. 10 Enriching education and creating opportunities Russell Group universities provide World-class teachers an outstanding student experience Our students work with
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Postgraduate Research Symposium Programme 23 June 2021
    [Type here] School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences Postgraduate Research Symposium Programme 23 June 2021 Organising Committe Agenda MS Teams Live Event 1 You can join Live Event 1 here. Time Speaker Title Professor Sebastien Ourselin Introduction Head of the School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's and College London Welcome 13:00 – 13:05 – 13:05 13:00 Dr Samantha Terry Senior Lecturer in Radiobiology, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London Ines Costa PhD student, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's Public Engagement College London 13:05 – 13:15 – 13:15 13:05 Aishwarya Mishra PhD student, Centre for Doctoral Training (CDT) in Smart Medical Imaging, King's College London and Imperial College London Dr Valentina Vitiello Professional Services Deputy Representative for the School DDI Committee; Diversity and Bullying Specialist Technical Operations Manager, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London 13:15 – 13:25 13:25 – 13:15 Dr Stamatia Giannarou Royal Society University Research Fellow and Lecturer in Surgical Cancer Keynote Speaker Technology and Imaging at the Hamlyn Centre for Robotic Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London Cognitive Vision in Robotic Surgery 13:25 – 14:05 – 14:05 13:25 Please refer to page 7 for further details. Student Please refer to page 4 for details. Three-Minute Thesis Presentations 14:05 – 14:35 – 14:35 14:05 Student Please refer to pages 5-6 for details. 1-Minute Poster Pitches 14:35 – 15:00 15:00 – 14:35 1 Poster Sessions The poster sessions will be taking place in two streams on the Wonder.me platform.
    [Show full text]
  • Msc Management
    Programme Specification (Master’s Level) MSc Management This document provides a definitive record of the main features of the programme and the learning outcomes that a typical student may reasonably be expected to achieve and demonstrate if s/he takes full advantage of the learning opportunities provided. This programme specification is intended as a reference point for prospective students, current students, external examiners and academic and support staff involved in delivering the programme and enabling student development and achievement. Programme Information Programme Title Management Award(s) MSc Programme Code N1UF Awarding Institution Imperial College London Teaching Institution Imperial College London Faculty Imperial College Business School Department Imperial College Business School Mode and Period of Study 1 calendar year full-time (12 months) Cohort Entry Points Annually in September Relevant QAA Benchmark Statement(s) and/or Master’s Degrees in Business and Management other external reference points Total Credits ECTS: 90 CATS: 180 FHEQ Level Level 7 EHEA Level 2nd cycle External Accreditor(s) AMBA, EQUIS, AACSB International Specification Details Student cohorts covered by specification 2016/17 entry Person responsible for the specification Veronica Russell, Teaching & Quality Manager Date of introduction of programme October 2005 Date of programme specification/revision September 2016 Page 1 of 11 Description of Programme Contents The MSc in Management is offered over 12 months full-time. The programme content reflects the contemporary and relevant management skills necessary for managing in turbulent environments. In particular the programme will equip the participants with conceptual and practical skills, and enable them to analyse and solve challenging problems. The programme combines academic rigour and practical relevance.
    [Show full text]
  • Overseas Resits: a Comparison of Russell Group Universities' Policies
    Overseas Resits: A Comparison of Russell Group Universities’ Policies The University of Manchester does not currently allow resit examinations to be held away from the University. This policy contrasts with those of many other Russell Group universities, which allow students whose permanent residence is overseas to take resit exams in their home country, either as a matter of course, or in exceptional circumstances. The table below sets out each Universities’ position on this, with information taken from their websites. Information from some Russell Group Universities (Cambridge, Oxford, Queen Mary, Queens Belfast, UCL) could not be found on their websites, which may indicate that they do not allow the practice of overseas resits. University Overseas Resits Venues Used Procedure Policy on Time University Fee More Info Allowed? Difference (additional fees may be charged by venues) Birmingham Yes, with British Embassy, Student contacts venue to Not stated explicitly, but £100 per exam https://intranet.bir permission of British Council check availability and obtain the request form advises period mingham.ac.uk/as/l students school Office or contact details, then completes ‘the actual (local) time earning- / department (exceptionally) request form (countersigned you will be required to spaces/exams/over Overseas by school / dept examinations attend for your seas.aspx University officer). Thereafter, examinations is likely to Examinations Office liaise with be different from venue and send student the UK times to account confirmation of acceptance or for any time difference’ otherwise. Bristol Yes, but in British Council Student completes request There must be some £50 per exam http://www.bristol. exceptional Office or form and returns it to home overlap between exam ac.uk/exams/exams cases only (and (exceptionally) school for signature by Head of times in the UK and -outside-uk.html/ not allowed at Overseas School or nominee.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Accounts 2008/9
    Annual Accounts 2008/09 We are focused on excellence. Our financial strength will enable us to embark on an investment programme to establish Birmingham as one of the world’s great universities. Mr Michael Gilbert, University Treasurer Annual Accounts 2008/09 3 Contents Vice-Chancellor’s Report 4 Treasurer’s Report 6 Corporate Governance 12 Responsibilities of the Council 16 Report of the Auditors 17 Statement of Principal Accounting Policies and Estimation Techniques 19 Consolidated Income and Expenditure Account 23 Balance Sheets 24 Consolidated Cash Flow Statement 26 Consolidated Statement of Recognised Gains and Losses 27 Notes to the Accounts 28 Five Year Summary Accounts 49 Financial Statistics 50 4 Annual Accounts 2008/09 Vice-Chancellor’s Report Great universities evolve. In that sense, we are truly Darwinian institutions. We evolve to meet the challenges of the day, to forge new ideas, and to shape the future. At the same time, we preserve what defines universities as places of learning, as engines of research, and as centres of learning, teaching, and professional development. In 2008/09 the world was transformed through global economic convulsions. The after-shocks will be felt for years to come, not least in higher education where constraints on public spending will mean an end to growing investment and force many universities to confront hard choices. Of course Birmingham is not immune from these challenges, but we are better placed than most to reposition ourselves and to prosper academically, even in difficult circumstances. We can do this because the University has been wisely managed, been realistic and far-sighted in its planning, and has generated the means to invest in its future.
    [Show full text]
  • Lead Bioinformatician JD (1).Pdf
    Job Description Job Title: Lead Bioinformatician Department/Division/Faculty: Epidemiology and Biostatistics/ Public Health/Medicine Campus location: St Mary’s Job Family/Level: Professional Services, Level 5 Responsible to: HDR UK Imperial site Director Line Management responsibility Junior bioinformatician for: Key Working Relationships Non-academia, academia and industrial partners within the HDR UK (internal): site, including HDR UK Fellows; Research Computing Services team, BRC ITMAT Data Science Group, Data Science Institute. Key Working Relationships HDR UK sites (including London sites – UCL, Kings College London, (external): London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine and Queen Mary University of London) Contract type: Full Time and Fixed term until 31 May 2023 Purpose of the Post HDR UK Health Data Research (HDR) UK is the new national institute for data science for health, which is being established in 2018 with long term funding support from research councils, UKRI, charitable and governmental research funders. The HDR UK seeks to drive improvements in the health of patients and populations through research at regional and national scale. The triple mission of HDR UK spans discovery of disease mechanisms in science through • Precision medicine and trials to public health; • Establishing platforms and underlying infrastructure to enable research at national scale; • Developing training and capacity opportunities. To deliver this mission, the five major London universities – UCL (coordinating), Imperial College London, King’s College London, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine and Queen Mary University of London – came together as a pan London Site. The terms of this partnership are set out in the Site Agreement. The six HDR UK Sites include London, Cambridge University (the Sanger and European Bioinformatics Institute), Oxford, the Midlands, Scotland and Wales/ Northern Ireland.
    [Show full text]
  • Informed Choices
    <delete 60mm from right> A Russell Group guide Informed to making decisions about choices post-16 education 2011 Preface The Russell Group The Russell Group Introduction <delete 60mm from right> How to use this guide Introduction The Russell Group represents 20 leading UK universities which are What you decide to study post-16 can have a major impact on what you committed to maintaining the very best research, an outstanding teaching can study at degree level. Whether or not you have an idea of the subject Acknowledgements and learning experience for students of all backgrounds and unrivalled you want to study at university, having the right information now will give Index links with business and the public sector. you more options when the time comes to make your mind up. Visit http://www.russellgroup.ac.uk to find out more. This guide aims to help you make an informed decision when choosing Post-16 qualifications your course for post-16 education. We hope it will also be of use to parents and how they are organised and advisors. Pre-16 qualifications and How to use this guide The Russell Group is very grateful to the Institute of Career Guidance (the university entry world’s largest career guidance professional body), and particularly Andy To make this document easier to use, the following design elements have Gardner, for their very valuable input. Making your post-16 subject been adopted: choices Subjects required for different ATTENTION!! degree courses WARNING! Although there are common themes, entry requirements (even for very Text inside this large arrow is of particular importance How subject choices can affect similar courses) can vary from one university to another so you should your future career options only use this information as a general guide.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Research and Education Indicators to Support Designation of Academic Health Science Centres in England
    CHILDREN AND FAMILIES The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and EDUCATION AND THE ARTS decisionmaking through research and analysis. ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE This electronic document was made available from www.rand.org as a public INFRASTRUCTURE AND service of the RAND Corporation. TRANSPORTATION INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS LAW AND BUSINESS NATIONAL SECURITY Skip all front matter: Jump to Page 16 POPULATION AND AGING PUBLIC SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY Support RAND TERRORISM AND Browse Reports & Bookstore HOMELAND SECURITY Make a charitable contribution For More Information Visit RAND at www.rand.org Explore RAND Europe View document details Limited Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law as indicated in a notice appearing later in this work. This electronic representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for non-commercial use only. Unauthorized posting of RAND electronic documents to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND electronic documents are protected under copyright law. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please see RAND Permissions. This report is part of the RAND Corporation research report series. RAND reports present research findings and objective analysis that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity. Errata To: Recipients of RR-318-DH, Analysis of research and education indicators to support designation of Academic Health Science Centres in England From: RAND Corporation Publications Department Date: May 2013 Re: Corrected pages (pp.
    [Show full text]
  • In This Issue
    In this issue: • Is university right for me? •The different types of universities • The Russel Group universities Is university the right choice for me? The University of South Wales, our partner university has put together a series of videos to help you answer this question. https://southwales.cloud.panopto.eu/Panopto/Pages/Viewer.aspx?id=d7f60e55-e50a-456d-a1ff -ac3d00e7ed13 What are the different types of universities? Ancient Universities These include Oxford (founded 1096) and Cambridge (founded 1209) are known as the Ox- bridge group and are the highest ranking universities in the UK St David’s College (1822-28) and Durham University (1832) follow the Oxford structure of col- leges and are considered the highest ranking universities after Oxford and Cambridge. Red Brick Red Brick Universities were formed mainly in the 19th century as a product of the industrial revolution and specialise in highly specialised skills in such are- as as engineering and medicine. University of Birmingham University of Bristol University of Leeds University of Liverpool University of Manchester The New Universities The New universities were created in the 1950s and 60s Some of these were former polytechnics or colleges which were granted university charter from 1990. These univer- sities focussed on STEM subjects such as engineering. Anglia Ruskin University, formerly Anglia Polytechnic (located in Cambridge and Chelmsford) Birmingham City University, formerly Birmingham Polytechnic University of Brighton, formerly Brighton Polytechnic Bournemouth University,
    [Show full text]
  • £86.8 Billion for the UK Economy
    Russell Group universities generate £86.8 billion for the UK economy Equivalent to the total UK-wide expenditure on the NHS for eight months The economic impact of Russell Group universities Analysis undertaken by London Economics • 261,000 jobs supported by Russell Group shows that each year teaching and universities directly and indirectly learning, research and knowledge transfer, education exports and the wider supply • 9:1 For every £1 of public research funding, Russell Group universities deliver an average chain of the 24 Russell Group universities return of £9 to the UK economy add £86.8 billion to the UK economy. This is just a snapshot of the economic • 7 non-UK undergraduate students contribution generated by our universities’ at a Russell Group university generate £1 million for the UK economy activities in the year 2015/16. Similar impacts will be created each year. • £177,000 impact per graduate Russell Group universities are anchor Graduates completing a full-time institutions in their local economies. undergraduate degree at a Russell Group university can typically expect to earn an They are found in every region and nation additional £88,000 over their working lives, of the UK, so the economic impact they with benefits to the public purse of an generate is spread right across the extra £89,000 whole country. The £86.8 billion contribution that Russell Group universities make to the UK economy comprises four elements: £20.7 billion delivered through the enhanced skills, productivity and earnings of the 166,000 UK-domiciled
    [Show full text]
  • Hauser Review of the Catapult Centres Evidence from the Russell
    Hauser Review of the Catapult Centres Evidence from the Russell Group 1. Summary • Catapults have the potential to be a significant national asset for the UK if research excellence is at the heart of their operations and if long-term funding is available that will allow them to deliver meaningful benefit. • The role universities have undertaken in the High Value Manufacturing (HVM) Catapult has proven invaluable in linking the Centres’ activities into the broader academic research base, across host universities and the whole of the UK, allowing them to build on existing networks of connections and knowledge, and driving forward innovation. The success of the HVM Catapult demonstrates the value in building on existing investments in the research base to deliver economic and other impacts, particularly in a time of very limited public funding. • Catapults should be engaged directly with the UK’s excellent research-intensive universities, enabling them to build on areas of existing strength and international comparative advantage. • The most recent Catapults being established appear much less well linked in with universities and their overall model for establishing engagement with excellence in the research base is unclear. We are very concerned that the value of Catapults will be undermined if engagement with the research base and academic networks within our world-leading universities is not at the core of their remit. • Resources should be focused where there is most comparative advantage to be gained from integrating research, teaching and translation. By locating Catapults within or alongside research-intensive universities, their remit can be enhanced to deliver training and development informed by excellent research and expertise in knowledge exchange and translation.
    [Show full text]
  • Links Between German U15 and Russell Group Universities
    Links between German U15 and Russell Group universities More than 73,383 scientific publications were co-authored between academics in the UK and Germany between 2013 and 2017. Of these, 19,325 publications (26%) were between academics at Russell Group and German U15 universities, with over 30% growth in the number of co-authored publications between our two groups from 2013 to 2017.1 The average field-weighted citation impact (FWCI) of research carried out in the UK is 1.58 and for research carried out in Germany it is 1.43. However, when our academics work together, the FWCI of their joint scientific publications is 2.95. Collaborations between Russell Group and German U15 researchers deliver an even more enhanced impact of 3.70. The UK and Germany work together more than they work with any other countries in Horizon 2020 (the EU’s multi-annual research and innovation programme). Russell Group and German U15 universities have made over 400 collaborative links funded by Horizon 2020 since the programme began in 2014. A third of German U15’s Horizon 2020 projects include a Russell Group university partner. 2,250 students from Russell Group universities studied or worked in Germany as part of the EU’s Erasmus programme in 2015/16. About the Russell Group The Russell Group represents 24 leading UK universities committed to maintaining the very best research, an outstanding teaching and learning experience and unrivalled links with business and the public sector. Russell Group universities attract and welcome talented staff and students from across the globe and these individuals make a vital contribution to our academic and economic life.
    [Show full text]
  • Middlesex University Research Repository an Open Access Repository Of
    Middlesex University Research Repository An open access repository of Middlesex University research http://eprints.mdx.ac.uk Blackman, Tim (2017) The Comprehensive University: an alternative to social stratification by academic selection. Discussion Paper. Higher Education Policy Institute. ISBN 9781908240286. [Monograph] Published version (with publisher’s formatting) This version is available at: https://eprints.mdx.ac.uk/25482/ Copyright: Middlesex University Research Repository makes the University’s research available electronically. Copyright and moral rights to this work are retained by the author and/or other copyright owners unless otherwise stated. The work is supplied on the understanding that any use for commercial gain is strictly forbidden. A copy may be downloaded for personal, non-commercial, research or study without prior permission and without charge. Works, including theses and research projects, may not be reproduced in any format or medium, or extensive quotations taken from them, or their content changed in any way, without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder(s). They may not be sold or exploited commercially in any format or medium without the prior written permission of the copyright holder(s). Full bibliographic details must be given when referring to, or quoting from full items including the author’s name, the title of the work, publication details where relevant (place, publisher, date), pag- ination, and for theses or dissertations the awarding institution, the degree type awarded, and the date of the award. If you believe that any material held in the repository infringes copyright law, please contact the Repository Team at Middlesex University via the following email address: [email protected] The item will be removed from the repository while any claim is being investigated.
    [Show full text]