Open Access Policy in the UK: from Neoliberalism to the Commons
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Magnov2004reformat For
Upcoming Events TABLE TENNIS INFO March 24-28 NZ Veteran Championships Whangarei April 20-21 Summer Nationals—Teams North Harbour Issue: 25 November 2004 22-24 Summer Nationals—Individuals North Harbour April 29-6 May World Championships Shanghai China May 7-8 Marlborough Open Blenheim June 4-5 North Harbour Open North Harbour 18 Hawkes Bay Open Napier July 8-10 North Island Open Auckland © August 13-14 Northland Open Whangarei August to be advised South Island Open Timaru September 28-29 NZ Schools Championships Christchurch 30-8 Oct NZ Open Championships Christchurch Change in Direction for IT Strategy National Coaches lack time to continue Table Tennis WORLD RANKINGS appreciates Lots from Around the Country Five top rated players in NZ (as at 1st November 2004) the support Racketlon????? given by: Women Men Li Chunli 51 Karen Li 133 Peter Jackson 278 Anna Lee 360 Aaron Li 281 Open Mixed Doubles Final Sabine Westenra 502 Shane Laugesen 426 Jiang Yang 574 Andrew Hubbard 432 New Zealand Championships --- Auckland Brad Chen 645 World Rankings by country at: http://www.ittf.com Published by TABLE TENNIS New Zealand Inc. Phone (04) 9162459 Fax (04) 4712152 P O Box 867 Level 5, Compudigm House 49 Boulcott St, Wellington E-mail - [email protected] World Wide Web - http://www.tabletennis.org.nz Photo courtesy: Terry Cockfield Produced by: Articles, letters and advertising Robin Radford Ph 04-232 5672 published herein do not necessarily 16 St Edmund Cres Tawa Fax 04-232 9172 L/R: Shane Laugesen (Auck) & Karen Li (Nth Hb), Wellington E-Mail [email protected] reflect the views of Table Tennis Anna Lee (Canty) & Seo Dong Chul (Korea). -
Reading Peer Review
EVE This Element describes for the first time the database of peer review reports at PLOS ONE, the largest scientific journal in ET AL. the world, to which the authors had unique access. Specifically, Reading Peer Review this Element presents the background contexts and histories of peer review, the data-handling sensitivities of this type PLOS ONE and Institutional of research, the typical properties of reports in the journal Change in Academia to which the authors had access, a taxonomy of the reports, and their sentiment arcs. This unique work thereby yields a compelling and unprecedented set of insights into the evolving state of peer review in the twenty-first century, at a crucial political moment for the transformation of science. It also, though, presents a study in radicalism and the ways in which Reading Peer Review Peer Reading PLOS’s vision for science can be said to have effected change in the ultra-conservative contemporary university. This title is also available as Open Access on Cambridge Core. Cambridge Elements in Publishing and Book Culture Series Editor: Samantha Rayner University College London Associate Editor: Leah Tether University of Bristol Publishing and Book Culture Academic Publishing Martin Paul Eve, Cameron Neylon, Daniel ISSN 2514-8524 (online) ISSN 2514-8516 (print) Paul O’Donnell, Samuel Moore, Robert Gadie, Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.33.14, on 25 Sep 2021 at 19:03:04, subject to the Cambridge CoreVictoria terms of use, available Odeniyi at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms and Shahina Parvin. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108783521 Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. -
Judo Finnish Open 10Th-11Th 2007 Vantaa Finland Men 60 Kg 1. Fatih
Judo Finnish Open 10th-11th 2007 Vantaa Finland Men 60 kg 1. Fatih TERIM Turkey 2. Nick KOSSOR United States 3. Scott MALONE Scotland 3. Gonzalo IBANEZ Canada 5. Juho REINVALL Finland 5. Tatu SAARINEN Finland Men 66 kg 1. Colin OATES Great Britain 2. Justin FLORES United States 3. Taylor TAKATA United States 3. James MILLAR Scotland 5. Michal POPIEL Canada 5. Joel BENOIT Canada Men 73 kg 1. Iain FEENAN Scotland 2. Michael ELDRED United States 3. Thomas IBURG Denmark 3. Alexander LUBCHENKO Russia 5. Gatis MILENBERGS Latvia 5. Nathaniel STAPLETON Great Britain Men 81 kg 1. Travis STEVENS United States 2. Aigars MILENBERGS Latvia 3. Mika TOROI Finland 3. Tyler BORAS Canada 5. Michael KAZYDUB Russia 5. Petteri LUUKKAINEN Finland Men 90 kg 1. Landry AMBOUROUE United States 2. Jerry LAMMASNIEMI Finland 3. Burhan KOCAN Turkey 3. Aleksandr MARMELJUK Estonia 5. Joakim NORLING Sweden 5. Akseli HALTTU Finland Men 100 kg 1. Martin PACEK Sweden 2. Rauli KÄRPÄNEN Finland 3. Andrew BURNS Great Britain 3. Adler VOLMAR United States 5. Villepetteri LAMMASNIEMI Finland 5. Gábor POTYI Hungary Men +100 kg 1. Thormodur JONSSON Iceland 2. Nodar METREVELI Georgia 3. Christoffer JOHANSSON Sweden 3. Anthony TURNER United States 5. Mustafa AKPINAR Turkey 5. Joe DELAHAY Great Britain Women 48 kg 1. Sayaka MATSUMOTO United States 2. Ann SHIRAISHI United States 3. Oiana BLANCO ETXEBERRIA Spain 3. Jeannette RODRIGUEZ United States 5. Bianca OCKEDAHL Canada 5. Kaisu REDSVEN Finland Women 52 kg 1. Kubra TEKNECI Turkey 2. Sanna ASKELÖF Sweden 3. Anni IKÄLÄ Finland 3. Tiia SUO-YRJÖ Finland 5. -
Open Access and Open Science in Europe and Switzerland: Things Are Moving
Hauptbibliothek Open Access and Open Science in Europe and Switzerland: things are moving Swiss Librarians for Evidence Based Medicine Meet and Greet for Swiss Biomedical Librarians Bern Prof. Dr. Christian Fuhrer, Hauptbibliothek (Main Library) , Head Open Access, University of Zurich [email protected] www.oai.uzh.ch 08.09.2016 OA and OS in Europe and Switzerland: things are moving, Christian Fuhrer Seite 1 Hauptbibliothek Abstract Open Access, the free access to scientific research results, has been a topic for various stakeholders for more than ten years. Yet most scientific publications are still not freely accessible and the traditional licence-based publishing systems continues to prevail. But recently, science politicians of various countries and the European Union have picked up the topic of Open Access, placed it into the context of Open Science, and now call for fundamental changes in the way resarch results should be incentivized, evaluated, distributed, published and reused. The Amsterdam Call for Action on Open Science, led by the Dutch EU Council Presidency, is a hallmark of this new political drive, which has the potential to deeply change the scholarly publishing system. Meanwhile in Switzerland, swissuniversities, the rector's assembly of all Swiss Higher Education Institutions, has taken the lead in elaborating a Swiss national Open Access strategy, following a request by the Swiss State Secretariat for Education, Research and Innovation. An important element of this strategy will be to bring together key stakeholders in Switzerland and to follow the European trends. This talk will summarize these recent proceedings in Europe and Switzerland and show which road Open Access is likely to follow in the coming years. -
Ddawson2012.Pdf (700.6Kb)
Open Science and Crowd Science: Selected Sites and Resources Diane (DeDe) Dawson Natural Sciences Liaison Librarian University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada [email protected] Table of Contents Introduction Open Science Crowd Science Methods and Scope Open Science – Definitions and Principles Open Science – Open Lab Notebooks of Individuals and Lab Groups Open Science – Blogs Crowd Science – Projects for Individuals or Small Teams Crowd Science – Volunteer Distributed Computing Projects The Main Software Organizations Selected Projects Further Sources for Projects Selected Examples of Collaborative Science Sites for Specialists Main Software & Online Tools for Open Science Open Science Conferences and Community Conferences Further Reading/Viewing Videos Reports and White Papers Open e-Books Selected Essays, Articles, and Interviews References Introduction “To take full advantage of modern tools for the production of knowledge, we need to create an open scientific culture where as much information as possible is moved out of people’s heads and laboratories, and onto the network” (Nielsen 2011, p.183). New Internet technologies are radically enhancing the speed and ease of scholarly communications, and are providing opportunities for conducting and sharing research in new ways. This webliography explores the emerging “open science” and “crowd science” movements which are making use of these new opportunities to increase collaboration and openness in scientific research. The collaboration of many researchers on a project can enhance the rate of data-collection and analysis, and ignite new ideas. In addition, since there are more eyes to spot any inaccuracies or errors, collaborative research is likely to produce better quality results. Openness early in the research process alerts others to the work resulting in less duplication of efforts. -
Judo Finnish Open 8.-9. November 2003 Vantaa Finland Judo Finnish Open 8.-9
Judo Finnish Open 8.-9. November 2003 Vantaa Finland Judo Finnish Open 8.-9. November 2003 Vantaa Finland EJU B-Tournament Results 2002 Results Contest sheets and statistics available here Men under 60 kg Women under 48 kg 1. Roland STEGMÜLLER Austria 1. Fiona ROBERTSON Great Britain 2. Andrei GODOVNIKOV Russia 2. Isabel LATULIPPE Canada 3. Frazer WILL Canada 3. Satu PIETARSAARI Finland 3. Valtteri JOKINEN Finland 3. Brigitte THIBAULT Canada 5. Roman RAKHMENKULOV Russia 5. Pontus HJERM Sweden Women under 52 kg 1. Jaana SUNDBERG Finland Men under 66 kg 2. Sanna ASKELÖF Sweden 1. Arten PYKHTIN Russia 3. Esther DURTSCHI Germany 2. Manuel MÜLLER Germany 3. Carolina JOHANSSON Sweden 3. Denis KOZLOV Latvia 5. Laurie WILTSHIRE Canada 3. Aarne PITKÄNEN Finland 5. Satu HUIKURI Finland 5. Gareth CARDER Great Britain 5. Ivan CHASHCHIN Russia Women under 57 kg 1. Maria LINDBERG Sweden Men under 73 kg 2. Swenja KROSIEN Germany 1. Robert BRENDAL Germany 3. Natalia YUHAREVA Russia 2. Markus PEKKOLA Finland 3. Louise RENICKS Great Britain 3. David PAPAUX Switzerland 5. Jennie ANDREASSON Sweden 3. Radu BRESTYAN Sweden 5. Jenny NYBERG Sweden 5. Ilya NIKOLAEV Russia 5. Vladimir GRILL Estonia Women under 63 kg 1. Johanna YLINEN Finland Men under 81 kg 2. Isabelle PEARSON Canada 1. Thilo PACHMANN Switzerland 3. Esther MYREBOE Norway 2. Roland KASPER Austria 3. Jenny DAVIS Great Britain 3. Janne ROMPPANEN Finland 5. Nicole SYDBÖGE Denmark 3. Jouni RANTA Finland 5. Danielle BEATON Canada 5. Mika TOROI Finland 5. Florian RINNERTHALER Austria Women under 70 kg 1. Marie-Helene CHISHOLM Canada Men under 90 kg 2. -
Invitation – Finnish Open 2020 – Final
INVITATION to compete in FINNISH OPEN 2020 World ranking and Badminton Europe Elite Circuit International Challenge Tournament Tournament dates 2 – 5 April 2020 Entry closes on 3 March 2020 Official hotel reservation closing date 13 March 2020 ORGANISER Badminton Finland, Valimotie 10, FIN-00380 Helsinki Event coordinator - Ilkka Hellgren Phone: +358 40 526 9939 E-mail: [email protected] https://finnishopen.sulkapallo.fi/en/ REFEREES Tournament Referee: Jens Köster (Germany) - [email protected] Deputy referee: Ari Vartiainen (Finland) – [email protected] DATES Wednesday 1 April 2020 - Practice courts available 16:00-21:00 at the venue Wednesday 1 April 2020 – Team Managers meeting 19:00 at the venue Wednesday 1 April 2020 – Umpire briefing 20:00 at the venue Thursday 2 April 2020: Qualifications (if necessary) from 09.00 Friday 3 April 2020: Main tournament from 09.00 Saturday 4 April 2020: Quarter Finals from 10.00 and Semi-Finals from 16.00 Sunday 5 April 2020: Finals from 10.00 The final frame schedule shall be made at least 20 days before the start of the tournament and shall be published on the tournament’s website. The organizer will arrange the transport from and to the official hotel for Team Managers and Umpires for meetings on April the 1st. VENUE Energia Areena, Rajatorpantie 23, FIN-01600 Vantaa Phone: +358 10 633 0303 (during tournament only) There will be free transportation between the official tournament hotel and the tournament venue for those who stay in the official hotel. CONDITIONS The Finnish Open will be conducted under the BWF General Competition Regulations and in accordance with the Badminton Europe Elite Circuit Regulations, of which the Finnish Open forms a part. -
Open Science and the Role of Publishers in Reproducible Research
Open science and the role of publishers in reproducible research Authors: Iain Hrynaszkiewicz (Faculty of 1000), Peter Li (BGI), Scott Edmunds (BGI) Chapter summary Reproducible computational research is and will be facilitated by the wide availability of scientific data, literature and code which is freely accessible and, furthermore, licensed such that it can be reused, inteGrated and built upon to drive new scientific discoveries without leGal impediments. Scholarly publishers have an important role in encouraGing and mandating the availability of data and code accordinG to community norms and best practices, and developinG innovative mechanisms and platforms for sharinG and publishinG products of research, beyond papers in journals. Open access publishers, in particular the first commercial open access publisher BioMed Central, have played a key role in the development of policies on open access and open data, and increasing the use by scientists of leGal tools – licenses and waivers – which maximize reproducibility. Collaborations, between publishers and funders of scientific research, are vital for the successful implementation of reproducible research policies. The genomics and, latterly, other ‘omics communities historically have been leaders in the creation and wide adoption of policies on public availability of data. This has been throuGh policies, such as Fort Lauderdale and the Bermuda Principles; infrastructure, such as the INSDC databases; and incentives, such as conditions of journal publication. We review some of these policies and practices, and how these events relate to the open access publishinG movement. We describe the implementation and adoption of licenses and waivers prepared by Creative Commons, in science publishinG, with a focus on licensing of research data published in scholarly journals and data repositories. -
P L O S 2 0 1 3 / 2 0 1 4 P R O G R E S S U P D A
PLOS 2013/2014 PROGRESS UPDATE 2 FrOM ThE ChAIr AnD CEO PLOS has been dedicated to leading a transformation in scientific research communication since its inception. The organization begins its second decade as a publisher by rededicating itself to creating and promoting the most effective means of scientific communication possible. In an age of constant and rapid change, PLOS believes that research assessment is in need of reinvention. One-time pre-publication review must be replaced by continual assessment that offers findings without unnecessary delay and fosters the evolution of scientific ideas over time. PLOS has taken important steps toward this ideal with open evaluation to explore alternative assessments of research outcomes, assessment of impact at the article level rather than by journal and by augmenting the depth of Article-Level Metrics through crowdsourcing of media coverage. Traditional publishing models and the static PDF are insufficient for 21 st century scientific communication. Integral to its effort to move beyond the article, PLOS implemented a new Data Policy that encourages scientific dialogue by ensuring access to the data that underlies the research findings. This in turn advances research through corollary improvements in quality, reproducibility and appropriate credit. Fortunately, growing momentum in Open Access research and policies frees scientific outputs from the constraints of traditional publishing models, accelerates dissemination of knowledge and engages communities in active dialogue and participation. PLOS exists because of the vital contributions of authors, readers, reviewers, editors, advisors, funders, librarians, policy advocates and staff. The active support of this extended community is critical to continue driving research communication towards its full potential. -
Open Scholarship and the Need for Collective Action Knowledge Exchange
University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Copyright, Fair Use, Scholarly Communication, etc. Libraries at University of Nebraska-Lincoln 2019 Open Scholarship and the need for collective action Knowledge Exchange Cameron Neylon, Curtin University, Australia Rene Belsø, DEIC, Denmark Magchiel Bijsterbosch SURF, the Netherlands Bas Cordewener Knowledge Exchange See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/scholcom Part of the Intellectual Property Law Commons, Scholarly Communication Commons, and the Scholarly Publishing Commons Knowledge Exchange; Neylon,, Cameron; Belsø,, Rene; Bijsterbosch, Magchiel; Cordewener, Bas; Foncel, Jérôme; Friesike, Sascha; Fyfe, Aileen; Jacobs, Neil; Katerbow, Matthias; Laakso, Mikael; and Sesink, Laurents, "Open Scholarship and the need for collective action" (2019). Copyright, Fair Use, Scholarly Communication, etc.. 128. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/scholcom/128 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Libraries at University of Nebraska-Lincoln at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Copyright, Fair Use, Scholarly Communication, etc. by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Authors Knowledge Exchange; Cameron Neylon,; Rene Belsø,; Magchiel Bijsterbosch; Bas Cordewener; Jérôme Foncel; Sascha Friesike; Aileen Fyfe; Neil Jacobs; Matthias Katerbow; Mikael Laakso; and Laurents Sesink This article -
Marktkonzentration
WIR. FÖRDERN. ZUKUNFT. Open-Access im Kontext der Forschungsförderung - Open Access Policy des Wissenschaftsfonds (FWF) Katharina Rieck, MA MA(LIS) FWF Open Science Manager Berlin am 12. März 2019 Dysfunktionaler Publikationsmarkt . Publikationen können nicht substituiert werden, jede Publikation ist ein Monopol (“each product represents a unique value and cannot be replaced”) . Verlage verkaufen große Publikationspakete (big deal) mit intransparenter Preispolitik (non-disclosure clauses) . Das Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis für Publikationen ist für WissenschafterInnen oft intransparent, weil sie für die Publikation nicht selbst bezahlen. Der Markt wird von einigen Oligopolisten mit operating profits von 35-42% (Einnahmen von ca. Ø $ 5.000 pro Artikel) dominiert (mehr als 50% entfallen auf 5 Verlage) . Verlage behalten das ausschließliche Verwertungsrecht (copyright transfer agreement) für Publikationen, das u.a. für hochprofitable Mehrwertdienste genutzt wird Herausbildung von steuerfinanzierten Informationsgiganten . Wissenschaftskarrieren werden oft nicht von der Qualität der Publikationen, sondern vom Namen des Verlages bestimmt (Luxury Journal Effect) als Gegenbewegung siehe DORA 12.3.2019 FWF Open Access 3 Marktkonzentration Geht der Trend der Oligopolisierung weiter, wird es in einigen Jahren zwei bis drei Anbieter geben, die den Markt nicht nur bei Publikationen, sondern für den gesamten wissenschaftlichen Workflow beherrschen. Marktkonzentration Source: Kramer B., Bosman J. (2015): 101 Innovations in Scholarly Communication - the Changing Research Workflow. figshare. Poster. https://figshare.com/articles/101_Innovations_in_Scholarly_Communication_the_Changing_Research_Workflow/1286826 12.3.2019 FWF Open Access 5 Was ist das Problem? Source: Dallmeier-Tiessen S. et al (2011): Highlights from the SOAP project survey. What Scientists Think about Open Access Publishing. https://arxiv.org/abs/1101.5260 12.3.2019 FWF Open Access 6 Benutzungsintensität von Sci-Hub Source: Bohannon, J. -
Thesis Draft Version
Open Access Policy in the UK: From Neoliberalism to the Commons By Stuart Lawson Draft PhD thesis, May 2018 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. This excludes Fig 4.1, which is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license. 1 Acknowledgements [full acknowledgements are still to be written, this is just to cover the legal basics] This research was supported by the Jisc Collections Studentship Award, which was awarded by Birkbeck, University of London and co-funded by the School of Arts at Birkbeck in conjunction with Jisc Collections. The text contains edited excerpts from the following prior publications: Lawson, Stuart. 2015. ‘The Politics of Open Access’, PhD proposal, Birkbeck, University of London <http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1494587> Lawson, Stuart. 2017. ‘Access, Ethics and Piracy’, Insights, 30(1): 25–30 <http://doi.org/10.1629/uksg.333> Lawson, Stuart. Forthcoming [2019]. ‘Public Libraries and Knowledge Politics’, in Old Traditions and New Technologies: The Pasts, Presents, and Futures of Open Scholarly Communication, ed. by Martin Eve and Jonathan Gray (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press) Lawson, Stuart, Jonathan Gray, and Michele Mauri. 2016. ‘Opening the Black Box of Scholarly Communication Funding: A Public Data Infrastructure for Financial Flows in Academic Publishing’, Open Library of Humanities, 2(1) <http://doi.org/10.16995/olh.72> 2 Abstract . 3 Acronyms and Abbreviations AGORA – Access to Global Online Research on Agriculture AHRC – Arts