Catholic University Law Review Volume 46 Issue 2 Winter 1997 Article 7 1997 McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Commission: Protecting the Freedom of Speech or Damaging the Electoral Process? Rachel J. Grabow Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.edu/lawreview Recommended Citation Rachel J. Grabow, McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Commission: Protecting the Freedom of Speech or Damaging the Electoral Process?, 46 Cath. U. L. Rev. 565 (1997). Available at: https://scholarship.law.edu/lawreview/vol46/iss2/7 This Notes is brought to you for free and open access by CUA Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Catholic University Law Review by an authorized editor of CUA Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact
[email protected]. MCINTYRE v. OHIO ELECTIONS COMMISSION: PROTECTING THE FREEDOM OF SPEECH OR DAMAGING THE ELECTORAL PROCESS? The First Amendment to the United States Constitution establishes the right to freedom of speech.' From its beginning, the United States has encouraged widespread discussion and debate over political issues affect- ing the lives of all citizens and the future course of the country.2 Perhaps 1. See U.S. CONST. amend. I. The First Amendment to the United States Constitu- tion, ratified in 1791, provides: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances." Id. The First Amendment is made applicable to the states by the Fourteenth Amendment.