Dissolution Kinetics of Sulfate Minerals
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Wright State University CORE Scholar Browse all Theses and Dissertations Theses and Dissertations 2008 Dissolution Kinetics of Sulfate Minerals: Linking Environmental Significance of Mineral-Water Interface Reactions to the Retention 2- of Aqueous CrO4 in Natural Waters Sweta Bose Wright State University Follow this and additional works at: https://corescholar.libraries.wright.edu/etd_all Part of the Environmental Sciences Commons Repository Citation Bose, Sweta, "Dissolution Kinetics of Sulfate Minerals: Linking Environmental Significance of Mineral- 2- Water Interface Reactions to the Retention of Aqueous CrO4 in Natural Waters" (2008). Browse all Theses and Dissertations. 230. https://corescholar.libraries.wright.edu/etd_all/230 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at CORE Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Browse all Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of CORE Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. DISSOLUTION KINETICS OF SULFATE MINERALS: LINKING ENVIRONMENTAL SIGNIFICANCE OF MINERAL-WATER INTERFACE REACTIONS TO THE RETENTION OF AQUEOUS 2- CrO4 IN NATURAL WATERS A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy By SWETA BOSE M.Sc. University of Calcutta, 2000 2008 Wright State University COPYRIGHT BY SWETA BOSE 2008 WRIGHT STATE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES March 18, 2008 I HEREBY RECOMMEND THAT THE THESIS PREPARED UNDER MY SUPERVISION BY Sweta Bose ENTITLED Dissolution Kinetics of Sulfate Minerals: Linking Environmental Significance of Mineral-Water Interface Reactions to the 2- Retention of Aqueous CrO4 in Natural Waters BE ACCEPTED IN PARTIAL FUFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF Doctor of Philosophy. _________________________________ Steven R. Higgins, Ph.D. Dissertation Director _________________________________ Don Cipollini, Jr., Ph.D. Director, Environmental Sciences Ph.D. Program _________________________________ . Joseph F. Thomas, Jr., Ph.D. Dean, School of Graduate Studies Committee on Final Examination _________________________________ Audrey E. McGowin, Ph.D. _________________________________ Songlin Cheng, Ph.D. _________________________________ G. Allen Burton, Jr., Ph.D. _________________________________ Udo Becker, Ph.D. _________________________________ Cindy K. Carney, Ph.D. ABSTRACT Bose, Sweta. Ph.D., Environmental Sciences Ph.D. Program, Wright State University, 2008. Dissolution kinetics of sulfate minerals: Linking environmental significance of 2- mineral-water interface reactions to the retention of aqueous CrO4 in natural waters Dissolution as a function of solution undersaturation (Ω) was studied on both celestite and barite (001) by the aid of atomic force microscopy (AFM). Both the sulfates exhibited non-linear reactivity trends showing increasing dissolution rates with decreasing Ω. In the case of celestite, the dissolution rate non linearity was attributed to a changeover in reaction mechanism. At higher undersaturations below a critical saturation state of Ωcrit ~ 0.1, dissolution occurred both along the existing step edges and also via the creation of new steps. At conditions near saturation states dissolution took place exclusively by removal of ions from existing step edges. On the other hand dissolution rate nonlinearity in the case of barite was controlled by changes in step speeds with Ω. Similar dissolution rate behavior also evident on powdered barite in mixed flow reactor system establishes the dissolution rate non-linearity in terms Ω to be the characteristic [Sr 2+ ] property of barite. Celestite (001) dissolution was also studied in terms of 2− [SO4 ] by AFM to examine the mineral’s reactivity under nonstoichiometric solute conditions. At Ω = 0.63, reaction kinetics were investigated by measuring 〈010〉 and 〈120〉 step [Sr 2+ ] speeds. Application of a theoretical model, describing step speed as a function of 2− [SO4 ] iv [Sr 2+ ] indicated that both step speeds reached maxima at 2− = 1. This implied that the rate [SO4 ] 2- 2+ of SO4 ion attachment was equal to that of the Sr ion to the kink sites. Laboratory 2- experiments on barite dissolution in the presence of CrO4 (aq) exhibited substantial 2- lowering in dissolution rates due to adsorption of CrO4 onto surface reactive sites. AFM studies on barite (001) at 70°C showed dissolution rates ~ 2.3 times lower at 1000 µM 2- CrO4 and MFR experiments on powdered barite at 25°C quantified ~ 2 times lowering 2- 2- in dissolution rates at 5 µM CrO4 . Transport of aqueous CrO4 (4mM) through powdered barite in one dimensional plug flow reactor showed delayed chromate peak arrival times compared to that of a tracer (Na+) at all flow rates. The efficiency of barite being able to retain aqueous chromate appears to be a possible means to clean chromate contaminated waste waters. v TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1. Introduction………...……………………………………………………………...1 1.1 Sulfates in the environment…………………………………………….1 1.2 Mineral reaction kinetics……………………………………………….3 1.3 Reaction kinetics obtained from laboratory and field studies………….4 1.4 Reaction kinetics obtained by various kinetic approaches……………..5 1.5 Importance of laboratory experiments………………………………….6 1.6 Previous studies on barite (BaSO4) and celestite (SrSO4)……………...7 1.7 General objective of the present study………………………………...17 1.8 Outline of the thesis…………………………………………………...18 2. Experimental Section………...…………………………………………………...28 2.1 Instrumentation & Analytical Techniques…………………………….28 2.2 Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM)…………………………………….28 2.3 Experiments in bench scale reactor systems…………………………..38 2.3.1 Mixed Flow Reactors……………………………………………...38 2.3.2 Column / Plug Flow Reactor………………………………………41 vi 2+ 2- 2.4 Ion Chromatography (IC) – Ba and SO4 analyses…………………44 2.5 Visible Spectrophotometry……………………………………………45 2.6 Atomic Emission Spectrometer………………………………………. 46 2.7 Experimental Solutions………………………………………………..50 3. Dissolution kinetics and topographic relaxation on celestite (001) surfaces: The effect of solution saturation state studied using Atomic Force Microscopy………………………………………………………...52 3.1 Introduction………………………………………………………… 53. 3.2 Experimental Section………………………………………………… 57 3.3 Results…………………………………………………………………61 3.3.1 Surface features on celestite (001) during dissolution…………… 62 3.3.2 Effects of saturation state on dissolution kinetics…………………66 3.3.3 Effects of sample experimental history on dissolution kinetics…...70 3.3.4 Effects of saturation state on surface morphology………………...71 3.4 Discussion……………………………………………………………..76 3.5 Summary………………………………………………………………86 4. The effect of cation : anion ratio in solution at constant undersaturation on the dissolution kinetics of celestite (001) studied by Atomic Force Microscopy………………………………………………88 4.1 Introduction……………………………………………………………89 4.2 Theoretical background………………………………………………...93 4.3 Experimental Section…………………………………………………..96 4.4 Results…………………………………………………………………97 4.4.1 Surface features on celestite (001) during dissolution…………….98 ' 4.4.2 Effects of varying (ri ) on celestite dissolution kinetics…………..98 vii ' 4.4.3 Effects of (ri ) on surface morphology……………………………104 4.5 Discussion…………………………………………………………….110 4.5.1 Dissolution kinetics of celestite at solute nonstoichiometry……...110 . 4.5.2 Dissolution morphological features on celestite at solute nonstoichiometry…………………………………………………111 4.6 Summary………………………………………………………………125 2- 5. An experimental study of coupled BaSO4 dissolution – CrO4 sorption: showing impacts of aqueous chromate on barite dissolution rates and a dynamic study of sorption and transport processes of chromate through barite beds………………………………………………………………….127 5.1 Introduction…………………………………………………………...128 5.2 Background Study…………………………………………………….136 5.3 Experimental Section………………………………………………….144 5.3.1 Microscopic Approach (AFM)……………………………………144 5.3.2 Macroscopic Approach (Mixed Flow Reactor – MFR)…………...146 5.3.3 Macroscopic Approach (Column / Plug Flow reactor - PFR)……..152 5.4 Theoretical Background……………………………………………….155 . 5.5 Results………………………………………………………………....157 5.5.1 Results from AFM Experiments…………………………………..158 5.5.1.1 Effects of saturation states on barite dissolution kinetics…...160 2- 5.5.1.2 Effects of aqueous CrO4 on barite dissolution kinetics …...160 2- 5.5.1.3 Effects of aqueous CrO4 on surface morphology………… 165 5.5.2 Results from MFR Experiments…………………………………..169 5.5.2.1 Barite powder dissolution kinetics in absence and presence of 2- aqueous CrO4 ……………………………………………………..172 5.5.3 Results from PFR Experiments…………………………………...179 viii 5.6 Discussion…………………………………………………………….184 5.7 Summary………………………………………………………………209 6. Conclusions and Future Studies………...……………………………………….. 210 Appendices A. Chromatograms and calibration curves………………………………..213 B. Barite dissolution as a function of fluid flow rate in a column reactor system……………………………………………………………..253 References…………………………………………………………………………..260 ix LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 2.1 A schematic illustrating mechanism of atomic force microscopy (AFM)……… .30 2.2 Different parts of Molecular Imaging AFM………………………………………31 2.3 Different parts of Hydrothermal AFM (HAFM) ………………………………….34 2.4 AFM images of a dissolving celestite surface …………………………………….37 2.5 Schematic of a Mixed Flow Reactor System (MFR) showing different parts ……40 2.6 Schematic of a Plug Flow Reactor System (PFR) showing different parts ………42 3.1 Dissolution Rates (rd) of celestite at different flow rates of