DOCSLIB.ORG

Summary Illicit Transactions and Seizures

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

C. 86. M. 86. 1946.x i . [0.c.300(y)] Geneva, October 1st, 1946. LEAGUE OF NATIONS ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON TRAFFIC IN OPIUM AND OTHER DANGEROUS DRUGS SUMMARY OF ILLICIT TRANSACTIONS AND SEIZURES DURING 1944 r e p o r t e d to the secretariat of the league of nations Noie This document, which was prepared by the Secretariat of the League of Nations before July 31st, had to be printed after that date. The cost of printing it was therefore borne by the United Nations. 4696. — 700 (F.). 625 (A.).10/46. Imp. Granchamp, Annemasse. — 3 — PART I CASES REPORTED IN PREVIOUS SUMMARIES IN REGARD TO WHICH FURTHER INFORMATION HAS BEEN RECEIVED Nil. — 4 PART II NEW CASES OF SEIZURES DIVIDED INTO THE FOLLOWING GROUPS: 1. R aw Opium. 4. H eroin. 2. P repared Opium and D ross. 5. Coca Leaves and Cocaine. 3. Morphine. 6. Indian H emp. 1. RAW OPIUM No. 2268. — Seizures in the Interior of Egypt during November and December 1943. Report communicated by the Central Narcotics Intelligence Bureau, Cairo, February 18th, 1945. Reference : 1 (a). Opium : 6 kg. 432 gr. O.C.S./Conf.l620. Hashish : 3 kg. 275 gr. 3. There were five cases, one in November and four in December. One concerned hashish and the rest opium. There were seven accused, all Egyptians. 4. There were three sentences of imprisonment for three years, two accompanied with fines of £e .500 and one with a fine of £e .600 ; one sentence of imprisonment for two years with a fine of £e .200, one of imprisonment for eighteen months and a fine of £e .300, one of fifteen months and a fine of £e .250 and one of twelve months and a fine of £e .200. No. 2269. — Seizures in the Interior of Egypt during the First Quarter of 1944. Report communicated by the Central Narcotics Intelligence Bureau, Cairo, February 18th. 1945. Reference : 1 (a). Opium : 8 kg. 100 gr. 0,C.S./Conf,1620. Hashish : 10 kg. 193 gr. 3. There were seven cases, four concerning hashish, two of hashish and opium and one of opium. The accused were all Egyptians. 4. Sentences of imprisonment ranged from eighteen months to three years and fines ranged from £ e .200 to £ e .500. No. 2270. — Seizures in the Interior of Egypt during the Second Quarter of 1944. Report communicated by the Central Narcotics Intelligence Bureau. Cairo. February 18th, 1945. Reference : 1 (a). Opium : 27 kg. 36 gr. O.C.S./Conf.I620. Hashish : 5 kg. 950 gr. 3. There were nine cases, five concerning opium alone, one concerning hashish alone and three concerning both. The accused were all Egyptians. 4. Sentences of imprisonment ranged from one to three years and fines from £ e .10(ï to £e.600. No. 2271. — Seizures in the Interior of Egypt during the Third Quarter of 1944. Report communicated by the Central Narcotics Intelligence Bureau, Cairo. February 18th, 1945. Reference : 1 (a). Opium : 270 kg. 65 gr. O.C.S./Conf.l620. Hashish : 223 kg. 196 gr. 3. There were nine cases, five concerning opium alone, one concerning hashish alone and three concerning both. A large seizure of 245 kg. 490 gr- 0 opium and 217 kg. 340 gr. of hashish took place at Fayed on July 28th, 1944. The accuse were all Egyptians. 4. Sentences of imprisonment ranged from one to three years and fines from £e.200 to £ e .500. No. 2272. — Seizures in the Interior of Egypt during October and November 1944. communicated by the Central Narcotics Intelligence Bureau, Cair . February 18th, 1945. Reference : 1 (a). Opium : 7 kg. 364 gr. 0,C.S./Conf.l620. Hashish : 1 kg. 160 gr. 3. There were four cases, two of which concerning °PlU I1 and hashish and two opium alone. The accused were all Egyptians. — 5 — 4. Sentences of imprisonment ranged from six months to three years and fines from £e.100 to £e .500. No. 2273. — Seizure at Alexandria on February 16th, 1944. Report communicated by the Central Narcotics Intelligence Bureau, Cairo, July 17th, 1944. Reference : 1 (a). Opium : 1 kg. 60 gr. Origin unknown. 0 C S. Conf.1541. 3. Upon information being received by the Special Investiga­ tion Branch of the British Army to the effect that a member of the British Forces, who had been reported as an absentee, was living at a certain house in Alexandria, the house in question was raided. Although the search proved negative in so far as the absentee was concerned, several obJects of War Department property and 1 kg. 60 gr. of opium were found. The occupant of the house, on interrogation, declared that the War Department obJects and the opium belonged to a Greek sailor of the Greek Royal Navy, who lived in her house. At this point, the sailor appeared and admitted the ownership but refused to say anything else. 4. On June 26th, 1944, this sailor was tried by the Mixed Tribunal, Alexandria, and was sentenced to imprisonment for one year and a fine of £ e .200. No. 2274. — Seizure at Alexandria on June 7th, 1944. Report communicated by the Central Narcotics Intelligence Bureau, Cairo, December 4th, 1944. Reference : 1 (a). Opium : 1 kg. 30 gr. Origin unknown. O.C.S./Conf.l678. w , . ° ° I, Mohammed Hussein Ghaleb ; Petros Arnaoutis. 3. Acting on information that a certain person of Alexandria was a friend of Arnaoutis, one of the accused in the Heliopolis bank robbery, the authorities raided the house of the person in question. This person was absent, but his wife was there and a search revealed the drugs seized. Ghaleb arrived soon after the search and claimed the drugs as his property. He stated that he had purchased them for £e .90 from a Palestinian soldier unknown to him. 4. Ghaleb was tried by the Drugs Summary Native Court and sentenced to imprisonment for three years and a fine of £ e .500. No. 2275. —- Seizure at Alexandria on June 28th, 1944. Report communicated by the Central Narcotics Intelligence Bureau, November 16th, 1944. Reference : 1 (a). Opium : 685 grammes in - i O.C.S.'Conf•o.,uum.ioou. 1680 uHashish v i. : 290one? gram m es \ Origin6 unknown. 3. It was learnt that an Egyptian, Sobhi Agami Salama, was trafficking in arms and his house was searched on June 28th. No arms were discovered, but the above drugs were found. Ahmed Mohammed Hassan, nephew of Sobhi Agami Salama, stated that the drugs in question had been purchased from two drug traffickers in Alexandria. _ 4. Sobhi Agami Salama was sentenced to imprisonment for three years and a fine of &.500, while his nephew was sentenced to imprisonment for one year and a fine of £e .200. Ihe two drug traffickers of Alexandria were acquitted for lack of evidence. No. 2276. — Seizure at Cairo on February 21st, 1944. Report communicated by the Central Narcotics Intelligence Bureau, Cairo, June 18th, 1945. Reference : 1 (a). Opium : 35 kg. 322 gr. / n ■ ■ , U'C.S./Conf.l669 u , • , 0 i oic; l Origin unknown. • Hashish : 3 kg. 215 gr. ) 6 , 2. Moscow Leon Ronco, Palestinian ; Maurice Mayer Costi, alian, watchmaker ; Samuel Vita Costi, Italian ; Jack Rizzo Gani ; Joseph Barouk Levy, rench ; Samha Ezra, of Abbassia ; and two British soldiers. , 3- Ronco and one of the British soldiers were arrested while in possession of 25 kg. of Danish and opium. Ronco stated that a British soldier when in Palestine told him that fo th - soldier had brought 375 kg. of drugs to Cairo and that his help wras needed for , e*r distribution. Ronco therefore came clandestinely to Cairo and, on his arrival, on K some the drugs had already been disposed of to Samuel Costi and Gani, who sold i ^ evy ‘ The other three boxes had been stored at the house of Maurice Costi. ad these sent to the house of Samha Ezra, where they were seized. £e 1 finr ^ onco was sentenced by default to imprisonment for five years and a fine of ac<Ju‘n ^an* to imprisonment for two years and a fine of £e.200 ; Samha Ezra was for ky the Summary Court, but the Court of Appeal sentenced her to imprisonment by Year and a fine of £e.200. The foreign subJects connected with the case were tried • ne Mixed Tribunal, Cairo, and the two Costi wrere each sentenced to imprisonment for — 6 eighteen months and a fine of £ e .200, and Levy to imprisonment for twelve months and a fine of £ e .200. As regards the two soldiers, the one arrested was handed over to the British Military Authorities and was proved to be insane ; the other could not be traced. No. 2277. — Seizures at Cairo on September 4th and 7th, 1944. Report communicated by the Central Narcotics Intelligence Bureau, Cairo, June 25th, 1945. Reference : 1 (a). Opium : 18 kg. 830 gr. Origin unknown. O.C.S./Conf.l675. Hashish : 2 kg. 830 gr. 2 . Taufik Khalifa Soued, merchant of Cairo ; three British soldiers who were deserters. 3. One of the soldiers was arrested on September 4th in the Haifa-Cairo train in possession of the opium in question. He said it was intended for Taufik Khalifa Soued. On September 7th the soldier was sent to Taufik’s shop under strict supervision accompanied by a boy confidant disguised as a porter. Taufik and the other two deserters from the British Army met them, took the valise and Jumped into a car, which drove away at high speed followed by the C.N.I.B. officers in another car. The G.N.I.B.
Recommended publications
  • Criminal Law—Hearsay Evidence

    Criminal Law—Hearsay Evidence

    Criminal newsletter January 2010.qxp 18/12/2009 11:57 Page 1 BLACKSTONE’S CRIMINAL PRACTICE BULLETIN Issue 2, January 2010 Welcome to Blackstone’s Criminal Practice Bulletin. The Bulletin is a quarterly newsletter designed to alert practitioners to key developments in criminal law and sentencing, and to place these changes in the context of the main work. They can be downloaded free of charge from <http://www.oup.com/blackstones/criminal>. We will publish further Bulletins in April and July 2010, and these will be available free of charge on the Blackstone’s Criminal Practice website at <http://www.oup.com/blackstones/criminal>. Website updates are set out on a chapter-by-chapter basis, with links to the full text of available judgments and to relevant legislation. By registering online you can be alerted to the posting of new material on the site and will receive news of all important changes by email. CASE DIGEST—IN BRIEF CRIMINAL LAW—HEARSAY EVIDENCE imperative that a trial must be fair and the interests of victims in particular and society in general that a crim- Horncastle inal should not be immune from conviction where a [2009] SC 14 witness, who has given critical evidence in a statement that can be shown to be reliable, dies or cannot be In considering the perceived conflict between the pro- called to give evidence for some other reason’. visions of the CJA 2003 on hearsay and the Strasbourg jurisprudence, the Supreme Court has supported the See Blackstone’s Criminal Practice:A7.74 and F16.18 ruling of the Court of Appeal ([2009] EWCA Crim 964).
  • Vessel Inventory Report

    Vessel Inventory Report

    Vessel Inventory U.S. Department of Transportation Maritime Report Administration as of July 1, 1990 Prepared by bffice of Trade Analysis and Insurance Division of Statist ics PART I VESSELS BY NAME VESSEL INVENTOR~ REPORT UNHEO STAlES FLAG DRY CARGU t.ND lANKER FLEETS 1o000 &ROSS TONS ANO OVER JULY 01 0 1990 NMIE OF VESSEl VESSEL TYPE OWNERfOPERA TOR DESIGN TYPE DWT YB lSI LT ALEX BONNY RO RD WILHNGlDN TRUST CO T-AU C 23100 1980 lSI Ll BALDO LOPE toNTRORU IHLMINGTON TRUST CU T-AKl( 26500 1985 lSl LI JACK LUMMU CONTRORG WILlfHIGTON TRUST CO T-AKX 26500 1986 ZNO ll JOHN P BOB RO RO WIUUNG;fON TRJST CO T-AKX 26500 1985 ADABELLE LYKES CONTSHlP l{KES BROS STEA~SHIP COMPANY INC C 6-M-H41 A 15100 1969 ~DELPH I VI UORY FRE'IGHTER LU SUJSAN BAY vr.2-S-AP2 10100 1945 AUM HM M CALLAGHA Rli RO LU JIV1E.S RIVER PRIVATE 13500 1967 ADHIRALlY BAY lANKER 652LEAS1NG CJ~PANY PRIVATE 80600 1911 AOUNIS lANKER FIR SI PENNSYLVANIA BANK N• 1\. FOREIGN CONSl 80200 1966 ADVANTAGE FREIGHTER REO RIVER SHIPPING CORP• FORE! (;N CONT­ 27600 1971 A 0 VENTURER PART LOtH LU JI<MES Rl VER C3-S-36A 11000 1960 ACENl PART CONI LU JAMES RIVER C3-S-3BA 11100 1961 H.llERI E· WAIT 5 lANKER U S COAST GUA~O PRlVt.TE 16900 1941 AlBIUN VICTORY FREIGHTER LU JAMES Rl VER VC2-S-AP2 10600 1945 ~LLEGHENY VICTORY FRE lGHlER LU BEAUMONT VCZ-S-AP2 10100 1945 ALLISON LYKES PART CONI LYK~S BROS STEt.MSHlP COMPANY INC Cb-S-b3C lZBOO 1964 ALMERIA LYKES CONTSH1P AMERICAN PRESIDENT LINES LTD C6-S-69C C 17500 1968 AMARILLO VICTORY FRE IGHlH LU BEAUMONT VC2-S-AP2 10700 1945 A fiB A SSADOR RO RO CROWLEY CARIBBEAN TRANSPORT, INC.
  • 'Liberty'cargo Ship

    'Liberty'cargo Ship

    ‘LIBERTY’ CARGO SHIP FEATURE ARTICLE written by James Davies for KEY INFORMATION Country of Origin: United States of America Manufacturers: Alabama Dry Dock Co, Bethlehem-Fairfield Shipyards Inc, California Shipbuilding Corp, Delta Shipbuilding Co, J A Jones Construction Co (Brunswick), J A Jones Construction Co (Panama City), Kaiser Co, Marinship Corp, New England Shipbuilding Corp, North Carolina Shipbuilding Co, Oregon Shipbuilding Corp, Permanente Metals Co, St Johns River Shipbuilding Co, Southeastern Shipbuilding Corp, Todd Houston Shipbuilding Corp, Walsh-Kaiser Co. Major Variants: General cargo, tanker, collier, (modifications also boxed aircraft transport, tank transport, hospital ship, troopship). Role: Cargo transport, troop transport, hospital ship, repair ship. Operated by: United States of America, Great Britain, (small quantity also Norway, Belgium, Soviet Union, France, Greece, Netherlands and other nations). First Laid Down: 30th April 1941 Last Completed: 30th October 1945 Units: 2,711 ships laid down, 2,710 entered service. Released by WW2Ships.com USA OTHER SHIPS www.WW2Ships.com FEATURE ARTICLE 'Liberty' Cargo Ship © James Davies Contents CONTENTS ‘Liberty’ Cargo Ship ...............................................................................................................1 Key Information .......................................................................................................................1 Contents.....................................................................................................................................2
  • Sexual Violence in the Digital Age: a Criminal Law Conundrum?

    Sexual Violence in the Digital Age: a Criminal Law Conundrum?

    German Law Journal (2021), 22, pp. 784–799 doi:10.1017/glj.2021.39 ARTICLE Special Issue: Sexual Violence and Criminal Justice in the 21st Century Section II: Sexual Autonomy and the Limits of Criminal Law Sexual Violence in the Digital Age: A Criminal Law Conundrum? Olga Jurasz1 and Kim Barker2 1Senior Lecturer, Open University Law School, Milton Keynes, United Kingdom and 2Senior Lecturer, Open University Law School, Milton Keynes, United Kingdom Corresponding author: [email protected] (Received 05 July 2021; accepted 05 July 2021) Abstract The emergence of new interactions, notably those online, has led to the parallel development of criminal behaviors—not all of which are captured by the current legal framework. This article addresses the challenge posed to criminal law by the emergence of technologically facilitated violence, specifically its sexualized online forms. In particular, it argues for cautious yet specific criminalization of violent behaviors online whilst considering the broader criminal liabilities of all actors involved in the facilitation and perpetration of digital sexual violence. This article draws upon national—contentious—examples of attempts to regulate disruptive sexual violence perpetrated through digital means, with particular attention given to provisions in the UK, Germany, and France. Keywords: Digital violence; sexual violence; criminal law; OTFSV; IBSA; TBSA A. Introduction: Digital Abuse and Criminal Law After #MeToo The #MeToo movement has highlighted—on a global and public scale—the common and wide-
  • The Prospect of Extraditing Julian Assange

    The Prospect of Extraditing Julian Assange

    NORTH CAROLINA JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW Volume 37 Number 3 Article 7 Spring 2012 The Prospect of Extraditing Julian Assange Molly Thebes Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.unc.edu/ncilj Recommended Citation Molly Thebes, The Prospect of Extraditing Julian Assange, 37 N.C. J. INT'L L. 889 (2011). Available at: https://scholarship.law.unc.edu/ncilj/vol37/iss3/7 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by Carolina Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in North Carolina Journal of International Law by an authorized editor of Carolina Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Prospect of Extraditing Julian Assange Cover Page Footnote International Law; Commercial Law; Law This note is available in North Carolina Journal of International Law: https://scholarship.law.unc.edu/ncilj/vol37/iss3/ 7 The Prospect of Extraditing Julian Assange Molly Thebes t I. Introduction .......................... ...... 889 II. Is Julian Assange a Journalist .......... ...... ......... 894 III. The Feasibility of Extraditing Journalists ....... ...... 898 A. Sweden ........................... ..... 899 B. Iceland.............903 1. Libel Tourism .................... ..... 904 2. Source Protection.. ................. ..... 906 3. Whistleblower Protections.....................907 4. International Effect of the Initiative ...... .... 908 5. Limitations of the Initiative .......... ...... 909 C. European Media Laws ................ ..... 911 IV. Conclusion............... ................. 913 I. Introduction The legal battle over the custody of Julian Assange has been well publicized in the media, with both Sweden and the United States vying for authority over the WikiLeaks founder and ex- computer hacker.' While the United States is seeking jurisdiction over Assange for his well-documented involvement in the unauthorized acquisition and dissemination of a quarter of a million diplomatic cables2 and tens of thousands of wartime tB.A.
  • Archbold Review 4

    Archbold Review 4

    Issue 4, May 13, 2010 Archbold Review Cases in brief Evidence—hearsay—Criminal Justice Act 2003 s.114(1) they in fact caused L to be paid benefit to which he was not (d)—defence that other committed offence—self-serving hear- entitled. R. v Passmore [2008] 1 Cr.App.R. 165, upon which say statements by the other—whether properly admitted L relied, was a case on Social Security Administration Act SETON [2010] EWCA Crim 450; March 12, 2010 1992 s.111A, not relevant to the proper construction of S’s defence on a charge of murder was that the killer was Theft Act 1968 s.17. Section 17 applied generally to the falsi- a third man, P, involved with him and the victim in a drug fication of accounting documents for the purpose of obtain- deal. P was serving a prison sentence for murder. Following ing financial gain or causing financial loss. It did not require a police interview at which S’s allegation was put to him (he that gain or loss should in fact result. In relation to what made no comment), P denied the offence in telephone calls was meant by “omits a material particular”, s.17(1)(b) re- to his son and his wife. As P would have known, the calls ferred to the production or use of a document which to the were recorded as a matter of course, as he was a category A defendant’s knowledge were or may be misleading, false or prisoner. Applying Z [2009] EWCA Crim 20, the judge had deceptive in a material particular.
  • Sureties Julian Assange

    Sureties Julian Assange

    JUDICIARY OF ENGLAND AND WALES JUDGE HOWARD RIDDLE, SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE (CHIEF MAGISTRATE) IN THE WESTMINSTER MAGISTRATES’ COURT PROFESSOR TRICIA DAVID AND OTHER SURETIES FOR JULIAN ASSANGE 8 OCTOBER 2012 Background In December 2010 Julian Assange surrendered to the UK authorities on a European Arrest Warrant issued in November that year by the Swedish Prosecuting Authority. At a second application for bail I granted conditional bail requiring the lodging of a security, and other conditions. The decision to grant bail was appealed and considered on 16th December 2010 by Mr Justice Ouseley in the Administrative Court. The grant of conditional bail was upheld but the conditions were varied. Among the conditions to be complied with before release was that a total of nine people were to enter into a recognizance to secure the surrender of Mr Assange at the time and place appointed. Sureties were taken in court and the defendant was released. An order for extradition was made by this Court on 24th February 2011, and Mr Assange was bailed as before. At that time the sureties were retaken, some at a police station and some at court, and made continuous to surrender for removal. Mr Assange was required to await his extradition with a duty to surrender to the police or any court, in connection with these extradition proceedings, at such time and place as he may be notified. The sureties were made subject to an obligation to pay the court the sum specified opposite their signature if Mr Assange failed to surrender to the custody of the police at such place, on such date, at such time as he may be 1 notified, or to surrender to the custody of any court if directed to do so in connection with these extradition proceedings.
  • Magistrates' Court Sentencing Guidelines

    Magistrates' Court Sentencing Guidelines

    Sentencing Guidelines Council Magistrates’Magistrates’ CourtCourt SentencingSentencing GuidelinesGuidelines Definitive Guideline FOREWORD The Magistrates’ Court Sentencing Guidelines have been a settled feature of magistrates’ courts for many years. This edition applies to all relevant cases appearing for allocation (mode of trial) or for sentence on or after 4 August 2008 and replaces the guidelines which were effective from 1 January 2004. It also supersedes the part of the Practice Direction covering Mode of Trial Decisions (Part V.51) in relation to offences contained within the guideline. This is the most extensive guideline produced by the Council and covers most of the offences regularly coming before a magistrates’ court which require decisions on allocation or on sentence. The guideline also contains explanatory material that sets out a common approach to more general issues. For the first time, there is a statutory obligation onevery court to have regard to this guideline in a relevant case and to give reasons when imposing a sentence outside the range identified. This guideline is the result of an intensive and consultative process, which has at all stages benefited from the involvement of key users of the guidelines. The Council is extremely grateful to all who have played a part in developing the guideline and has greatly appreciated the time and thought that has gone into the preparation of responses to each aspect of the consultation. The Council is also enormously grateful to the Sentencing Advisory Panel and, in particular, to the members of its advisory group, for the extensive consideration they have given, not only to detailed matters of content but also to ensuring a proper balance in the assessment of the seriousness of all the offences involved.
  • Minutes of the Sentencing Council, 14 September 2012

    Minutes of the Sentencing Council, 14 September 2012

    MEETING OF THE SENTENCING COUNCIL 14 SEPTEMBER 2012 MINUTES Members present: Brian Leveson (Chairman) John Crawforth William Davis Siobhain Egan Henry Globe Tim Godwin Anthony Hughes Alistair McCreath Katharine Rainsford Julian Roberts Keir Starmer Colman Treacy Apologies: Anne Arnold Gillian Guy Advisers present: Paul Cavadino Paul Wiles Observers: Ruth Coffey (Legal advisor to the Lord Chief Justice) Helen Judge (Director of Sentencing and Rehabilitation, Ministry of Justice) Robert Lennox (Effective Sentencing Policy, Ministry of Justice) Lynne Owens (Chief Constable, Surrey Police) Jonathan Solly (Secretary to the Criminal Procedure Rule Committee) Members of Office in Michelle Crotty (Head of Office) Attendance Jackie Burney Bee Ezete Azhar Hasham Emma Marshall Karen Moreton Nigel Patrick Ameer Rasheed Keir Rodgers Helen Stear Trevor Steeples Vanessa Watling 1 1. WELCOME AND APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE 1.1. Apologies were received as set out above. 2. MINUTES OF LAST MEETING 2.1. Minutes from the meeting of 20 July 2012 were agreed. 3. MATTERS ARISING 3.1. The Chairman noted that this is Tim Godwin’s last meeting and thanked him for his contribution to the work of the Council during what has been a very busy period for him. 3.2. The Council discussed its forthcoming work on fraud offences, bribery and money laundering in the light of its already full work programme. It was suggested that the work programme should be reviewed and this work properly timetabled. ACTION: OFFICE TO REVIEW THE WORK PLAN FOR 2013-2016 AND PRESENT TO COUNCIL AT THE NEXT MEETING. 3.3. The Council discussed the letter received from the Chief Magistrate Judge Howard Riddle on organised theft and pick-pocketing in the Westminster area.
  • 'Regina V John Terry': the Discursive Construction of an Alleged Racist Event

    'Regina V John Terry': the Discursive Construction of an Alleged Racist Event

    'Regina v John Terry': The Discursive Construction of an Alleged Racist Event Gavins, J., & Simpson, P. (2015). 'Regina v John Terry': The Discursive Construction of an Alleged Racist Event. Discourse & Society, 26(6), 712-732. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926515592783 Published in: Discourse & Society Document Version: Peer reviewed version Queen's University Belfast - Research Portal: Link to publication record in Queen's University Belfast Research Portal Publisher rights © The Author(s) 2015 General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Queen's University Belfast Research Portal is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The Research Portal is Queen's institutional repository that provides access to Queen's research output. Every effort has been made to ensure that content in the Research Portal does not infringe any person's rights, or applicable UK laws. If you discover content in the Research Portal that you believe breaches copyright or violates any law, please contact [email protected]. Download date:26. Sep. 2021 Cover sheet: Title: ‘Regina v John Terry: The Discursive Construction of an Alleged Racist Event’ Short title: ‘Regina v John Terry’ Article size: 10,580 words; 1.56 MB. Authors’ details: Joanna Gavins, School of English, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S3 7RA, UK. Telephone: 00441142220214 Email: [email protected] and Paul Simpson, School of English, Queen’s University Belfast, UK, BT7 1NN. Telephone: 00442890491065 Email: [email protected] Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank an external reviewer and the editor of this journal for their comments and suggestions on an earlier draft of this article.
  • Part IV the Horizontal System of Enforcement

    Part IV the Horizontal System of Enforcement

    UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) The global prosecution of core crimes under international law Soler, C. Publication date 2017 Document Version Other version License Other Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Soler, C. (2017). The global prosecution of core crimes under international law. General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:30 Sep 2021 Part IV The Horizontal System of Enforcement 216 Chapter 14: Aut dedere aut judicare In primis, suffice to say that it might be hard to conceive of the enforcement of international criminal justice as predominantly dependent upon the execution of ‘something’ embodied merely in four Latin words. In practice, however, this is not a figment of one’s imagination.
  • MVCC NEWS “Keeping Em Rolling, Floating and Flying for 36 Years”

    MVCC NEWS “Keeping Em Rolling, Floating and Flying for 36 Years”

    MVCC NEWS “Keeping em rolling, floating and flying for 36 years” Issue #1 2014 Bougainville 1944, Looks Like an International M-5H-6 Cargo buried the front axle and the Seabees have brought in their International TD-9 to pull it out. In the mean time, a couple of armed Marines have pulled up in their Dodge WC57 Command Car. A LVT-1 has shown up to give a hand although they seem more interested in something going on behind the Command Car as are the armed Marines who are going to see what’s up. There is a Jeep that is mired and a Henry Spen Trailer with something interesting in the bed sitting with its tongue down in the mud. USMC NARA A PUBLICATION OF THE MILITARY VEHICLE COLLECTORS OF CALIFORNIA Visit our website: www.mvccnews.net contents Business members . 8 Upcoming Events . 3 MVCC Staff . 5-6 CLASSIFIEDS . .14-15 MVCC & MVPA Membership Applications . 20 MVCC QUARTERMASTERS CORNER MVCC Quartermaster, Look Here for MVCC gear for sale Chris Jorgensen (831) 426-0787 [email protected] International 1 1/2 ton M-3-4 cargo trucks haul supplies off the beach. Guadalcanal USMC Visit our website: www.mvccnews.net 2 UPCOMING EVENTS January 2014 This could be an event you sent in to get listed in the MVCC Newsletter. Remember the earlier you get the event info to the editor, the better your chances are of attracting participants and vehicles. [email protected] March 21-23, 2014 War games filming Operation Lion Claws Military Simulation Series. To be held at the closed General Mills Flour Factory in Vallejo.