Unofficial United States Guide to the First Additional Protocol to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Unofficial United States Guide to the First Additional Protocol to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949 AIR UNIVERSITY Unofficial United States Guide to the First Additional Protocol to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949 THEODORE RICHARD Colonel, USAF Air University Press Curtis E. LeMay Center for Doctrine Development and Education Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama Chief of Staff, U.S. Air Force Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Gen David L. Goldfein Names: Richard, Theodore Thomas, author. | Air Commander, Air Education University (U.S.). Press, issuing body. and Training Command Title: Unofficial United States guide to the First Additional Lt Gen Steven L. Kwast Protocol to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949 / Theodore Richard. Commander and President, Other titles: Also known as: Unofficial United States Air University guide to the First Protocol Additional to the Geneva Lt Gen Anthony J. Cotton Conventions of 12 August 1949 Description: First edition. | Maxwell AFB, AL : Air Commander, Curtis E. LeMay Center for University Press, [2019] | Includes bibliographical Doctrine Development and Education references and index. Maj Gen Michael D. Rothstein Identifiers: LCCN 2019015312 | ISBN 9781585662920 Subjects: LCSH: Geneva Conventions (1949 August 12). Director, Air University Press Protocols, etc. (1977 June 8)--Handbooks, manuals, etc. | Lt Col Darin M. Gregg Humanitarian law--United States--Handbooks, manuals, etc. | International law and human rights--United States-- Handbooks, manuals, etc. | United States--Military policy-- AIR UNIVERSITY PRESS Handbooks, manuals, etc. | United States--Armed Forces-- Rules and practice. | United States. Department of Project Editor Defense--Rules and practice. Donna Budjenska Classification: LCC KZ6455.2 .R53 2019 | DDC 341.67-- dc23 | SUDOC D 301.26/6-8:G 28 LC record available at Cover Design https://lccn.loc.gov/2019015312 L. Susan Fair Composition and Prepress Production Thomasa Huffstutler The Judge Advocate General’s School Air University Press 600 Chennault Circle, Bldg. 1405 Maxwell AFB, AL 36112-6010 https://www.airuniversity.af.edu/AUPress Published by Air University Press in May 2019 Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/AirUnivPress and Twitter: https://twitter.com/aupress Disclaimer Opinions, conclusions, and recommendations expressed or implied within are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the Judge Advocate General’s Corps, the Air University, the United States Air Force, the Department of Defense, the Air Education and Training Command, or any other US government agency. Cleared for public release: distribution unlimited. This book and others are available at the AU Press website: https://www.airuniversity.af.edu/AUPress. Dedicated to Ankie Contents Foreword ............................................................. 1 About the Author .................................................... 2 Introduction .......................................................... 3 Preamble ............................................................. 7 PART I GENERAL PROVISIONS Article 1 General principles and scope of application ........ 9 Article 2 Definitions ������������������������������������������� 14 Article 3 Beginning and end of application .................. 15 Article 4 Legal status of the Parties to the conflict .......... 16 Article 5 Appointment of Protecting Powers and of their substitute ��������������������������������������� 16 Article 6 Qualified persons .................................... 19 Article 7 Meetings ............................................. 20 PART II WOUNDED, SICK AND SHIPWRECKED SECTION I: GENERAL PROTECTION Article 8 Terminology ......................................... 21 Article 9 Field of application ................................. 24 Article 10 Protection and care .................................. 25 Article 11 Protection of persons ................................ 26 Article 12 Protection of medical units ������������������������� 29 Article 13 Discontinuance of protection of civilian medical units ........................................ 30 Article 14 Limitations on requisition of civilian medical units �������������������������������������������������� 31 Article 15 Protection of civilian medical and religious personnel ............................................ 32 Article 16 General protection of medical duties ............... 34 iv Article 17 Role of the civilian population and of aid societies .............................................. 34 Article 18 Identification ���������������������������������������� 35 Article 19 Neutral and other States not Parties to the conflict 38 Article 20 Prohibition of reprisals .............................. 38 SECTION II: MEDICAL TRANSPORTATION Article 21 Medical vehicles .................................... 39 Article 22 Hospital ships and coastal rescue craft ............. 39 Article 23 Other medical ships and craft ...................... 41 Article 24 Protection of medical aircraft ....................... 43 Article 25 Medical aircraft in areas not controlled by an adverse Party ........................................ 44 Article 26 Medical aircraft in contact or similar zones ....... 45 Article 27 Medical aircraft in areas controlled by an adverse Party ........................................ 45 Article 28 Restrictions on operations of medical aircraft ..... 47 Article 29 Notifications and agreements concerning medical aircraft ...................................... 48 Article 30 Landing and inspection of medical aircraft ........ 50 Article 31 Neutral or other States not Parties to the conflict .. 52 SECTION III: MISSING AND DEAD PERSONS Article 32 General principle .................................... 54 Article 33 Missing persons ..................................... 55 Article 34 Remains of deceased ................................ 56 PART III METHODS AND MEANS OF WARFARE COMBATANT AND PRISONER-OF-WAR STATUS SECTION I: METHODS AND MEANS OF WARFARE Article 35 Basic rules ........................................... 59 Article 36 New weapons ....................................... 62 v Article 37 Prohibition of perfidy ............................... 62 Article 38 Recognized emblems ............................... 64 Article 39 Emblems of nationality ����������������������������� 65 Article 40 Quarter ............................................... 67 Article 41 Safeguard of an enemy “hors de combat”.......... 67 Article 42 Occupants of aircraft ................................ 69 SECTION II: COMBATANT AND PRISONER-OF-WAR STATUS Article 43 Armed forces ........................................ 70 Article 44 Combatants and prisoners of war ������������������ 71 Article 45 Protection of persons who have taken part in hostilities ......................................... 77 Article 46 Spies ................................................. 79 Article 47 Mercenaries ......................................... 81 PART IV CIVILIAN POPULATION SECTION I: GENERAL PROTECTION AGAINST EFFECTS OF HOSTILITIES CHAPTER I BASIC RULE AND FIELD OF APPLICATION Article 48 Basic rule ............................................ 83 Article 49 Definition of attacks and scope of application ����� 84 CHAPTER II CIVILIANS AND CIVILIAN POPULATION Article 50 Definition of civilians and civilian population .... 85 Article 51 Protection of the civilian population ............... 86 CHAPTER III CIVILIAN OBJECTS Article 52 General protection of civilian objects .............. 98 Article 53 Protection of cultural objects and of places of worship ......................................... 107 Article 54 Protection of objects indispensable to the survival of the civilian population ............... 110 Article 55 Protection of the natural environment ........... 112 vi Article 56 Protection of works and installations containing dangerous forces ...................... 113 CHAPTER IV PRECAUTIONARY MEASURES Article 57 Precautions in attack .............................. 117 Article 58 Precautions against the effects of attacks �������� 129 CHAPTER V LOCALITIES AND ZONES UNDER SPECIAL PROTECTION Article 59 Non-defended localities ........................... 131 Article 60 Demilitarized zones ............................... 135 CHAPTER VI CIVIL DEFENCE Article 61 Definitions and scope ............................. 137 Article 62 General protection ................................ 140 Article 63 Civil defence in occupied territories ............. 141 Article 64 Civilian civil defence organizations of neutral or other States not Parties to the conflict and international co-ordinating organizations ........ 142 Article 65 Cessation of protection ........................... 143 Article 66 Identification �������������������������������������� 144 Article 67 Members of the armed forces and military units assigned to civil defence organizations .... 146 SECTION II: RELIEF IN FAVOUR OF THE CIVILIAN POPULATION Article 68 Field of application ............................... 147 Article 69 Basic needs in occupied territories ............... 148 Article 70 Relief actions ...................................... 148 Article 71 Personnel participating in relief actions ......... 150 SECTION III: TREATMENT OF PERSONS IN THE POWER OF A PARTY TO THE CONFLICT CHAPTER I FIELD OF APPLICATION AND PROTECTION OF PERSONS AND OBJECTS Article 72 Field of application ............................... 151 Article 73 Refugees and stateless persons ................... 151 vii Article 74 Reunion of dispersed families .................... 152 Article 75 Fundamental guarantees .........................
Recommended publications
  • Reservations to Treaties, Prohibited Reservations and Some Unsolved Issued Related to Them
    ISSN 2039-2117 (online) Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences Vol 6 No 2 S2 ISSN 2039-9340 (print) MCSER Publishing, Rome-Italy March 2015 Reservations to Treaties, Prohibited Reservations and some Unsolved Issued Related to Them Fjorda Shqarri Phd candidate, Faculty of Law, University of Tirana, Professor at Faculty of Law, University of Tirana, Department of Public Law [email protected] Doi:10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n2s2p97 Abstract The capacity of states to conclude treaties is the most important premise of their legal personality, but sometimes a state wants to be part of the treaty but also wants to exclude the effect of some provisions. The statement, however phrased or named, made by a State, when signing, ratifying, accepting, approving or acceding to a treaty, whereby it purports to exclude or to modify the legal effect of certain provisions of the treaty in their application to that State is called reservation to the treaty. This paper aims to analyze on the basis of a qualitative methodology, based on research in the literature and relevant legal acts, the role of reservations in the conclusion of treaties between states, its content, the acts similar to reservations and also the prohibited reservations. The consequences of the reservations and the relations between reserving sate and the parties of the treaty, as well as other important issues related to them. Keywords: treaties, reservation, interpretative declaration, prohibited reservation, compatibility test 1. General Overview of the Legal Regime of Reservations Article 2/1/d) of Vienna Convention “On the law of treaties” 1969 (mentioned below as Vienna Convention) defines a reservation as “a unilateral statement, however phrased or named, made by a State, when signing, ratifying, accepting, approving or acceding to a treaty, whereby it purports to exclude or to modify the legal effect of certain provisions of the treaty in their application to that State;” (Vienna Convention, art.
    [Show full text]
  • To the William Howard Taft Papers. Volume 1
    THE L I 13 R A R Y 0 F CO 0.: G R 1 ~ ~ ~ • P R I ~ ~ I I) I ~ \J T ~' PAP E R ~ J N 1) E X ~ E R IE S INDEX TO THE William Howard Taft Papers LIBRARY OF CONGRESS • PRESIDENTS' PAPERS INDEX SERIES INDEX TO THE William Ho-ward Taft Papers VOLUME 1 INTRODUCTION AND PRESIDENTIAL PERIOD SUBJECT TITLES MANUSCRIPT DIVISION • REFERENCE DEPARTMENT LIBRARY OF CONGRESS WASHINGTON : 1972 Library of Congress 'Cataloging in Publication Data United States. Library of Congress. Manuscript Division. Index to the William Howard Taft papers. (Its Presidents' papers index series) 1. Taft, William Howard, Pres. U.S., 1857-1930.­ Manuscripts-Indexes. I. Title. II. Series. Z6616.T18U6 016.97391'2'0924 70-608096 ISBN 0-8444-0028-9 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 - Price $24 per set. Sold in'sets only. Stock Number 3003-0010 Preface THIS INDEX to the William Howard Taft Papers is a direct result of the wish of the Congress and the President, as expressed by Public Law 85-147 approved August 16, 1957, and amended by Public Laws 87-263 approved September 21, 1961, and 88-299 approved April 27, 1964, to arrange, index, and microfilm the papers of the Presidents in the Library of Congress in order "to preserve their contents against destruction by war or other calamity," to make the Presidential Papers more "readily available for study and research," and to inspire informed patriotism. Presidents whose papers are in the Library are: George Washington James K.
    [Show full text]
  • Tables for UN Compilation on Pakistan I. Scope of International
    Tables for UN Compilation on Pakistan I. Scope of international obligations1 A. International human rights treaties2 Status during previous cycle Action after review Not ratified/not accepted Ratification, accession or ICERD (1966) OP -CRC-AC (2016) ICRMW succession ICESCR (2008) ICPPED ICCPR (2010) ICCPR-OP 2 CEDAW (1996) OP-CAT CAT (2010) CRC (1990) OP-CRC-SC (2011) CRPD (2011) Complaints procedures, – – ICERD, art. 14 inquiries and ICCPR, art. 41 urgent action3 ICCPR-OP 1 OP-ICESCR OP-CEDAW CAT, arts. 20-22 OP-CRC-IC OP-CRPD ICRMW ICPPED Reservations and / or declarations Status during previous cycle Action after review Current Status ICESCR (General OP -CRC-AC – declaration, 2008) (Declaration, art. 3 para. 2, CEDAW (General minimum age of recruitment declaration and reservation 16 years, (2016) art. 29, para. 1, 1996) CAT (Reservation, arts. 8 para. 2, 28 para. 1 and 30 para. 1. 2010) ICCPR (General reservation, 2008) B. Other main relevant international instruments Status during previous cycle Action after review Not ratified Ratification, accession or Convention on the – Rome Statute of the succession Prevention and Punishment International Criminal Court of the Crime of Genocide Geneva Conventions of 12 Palermo Protocol5 August 19494 Additional Protocols I, II and III to the 1949 Geneva Conventions6 ILO fundamental – Conventions on refugees conventions7 and stateless persons8 – – Convention against Discrimination in Education – – ILO Conventions Nos. 169 and 1899 II. Cooperation with human rights mechanisms and bodies A. Cooperation
    [Show full text]
  • Law of War Handbook 2005
    LAW OF WAR HANDBOOK (2005) MAJ Keith E. Puls Editor 'Contributing Authors Maj Derek Grimes, USAF Lt Col Thomas Hamilton, USMC MAJ Eric Jensen LCDR William O'Brien, USN MAJ Keith Puls NIAJ Randolph Swansiger LTC Daria Wollschlaeger All of the faculty who have served before us and contributed to the literature in the field of operational law. Technical Support CDR Brian J. Bill, USN Ms. Janice D. Prince, Secretary JA 423 International and Operational Law Department The Judge Advocate General's Legal Center and School Charlottesville, Virginia 22903 PREFACE The Law of War Handbook should be a start point for Judge Advocates looking for information on the Law of War. It is the second volume of a three volume set and is to be used in conjunction with the Operational Law Handbook (JA422) and the Documentary Supplement (JA424). The Operational Law Handbook covers the myriad of non-Law of War issues a deployed Judge Advocate may face and the Documentary Supplement reproduces many of the primary source documents referred to in either of the other two volumes. The Law of War Handbook is not a substitute for official references. Like operational law itself, the Handbook is a focused collection of diverse legal and practical information. The handbook is not intended to provide "the school solution" to a particular problem, but to help Judge Advocates recognize, analyze, and resolve the problems they will encounter when dealing with the Law of War. The Handbook was designed and written for the Judge Advocates practicing the Law of War. This body of law is known by several names including the Law of War, the Law of Armed Conflict and International Humanitarian Law.
    [Show full text]
  • The Netherlands 2018 Arbitration Yearbook | the Netherlands
    11th Edition 2017-2018 The Baker McKenzie International Arbitration Yearbook The Netherlands 2018 Arbitration Yearbook | The Netherlands The Netherlands 1 2 Robert van Agteren and Mathieu Raas A. Legislation and rules A.1 Legislation In the Netherlands, arbitrations seated in the Netherlands and commenced after 1 January 2015 are governed by the 2015 Arbitration Act. Arbitrations commenced before that date, as well as related court proceedings, continue to be governed by the 1986 Arbitration Act. Both acts were inspired by the 1986 UNCITRAL Model Law and contain fairly standard and arbitration-friendly provisions relating to the arbitration agreement, arbitrators (appointment, disclosures and challenges), procedure, witness and expert hearings, competence-competence and the content of the arbitral award.3 The Netherlands is a party to various international treaties relating to international arbitration. The New York Convention has been in force in the Netherlands since 1964. Consequently, arbitral awards that are rendered in another New York Convention signatory state and which, according to the competent Dutch court, satisfy the criteria from that convention are recognized and can be enforced in the Netherlands.4 As will be discussed in Section B below, in the past year the Netherlands Supreme Court rendered two notable judgments in relation to enforcement under the New York Convention. The 1 Robert van Agteren is a partner in Baker McKenzie’s Amsterdam office. He heads the Amsterdam Dispute Resolution Practice Group. His arbitration experience ranges from renewable energy construction disputes to pharmaceutical distribution matters. 2 Mathieu Raas is a senior associate in Baker McKenzie’s Amsterdam office. He is experienced in commercial, post M&A and joint venture disputes.
    [Show full text]
  • Corporate Actors: the Legal Status of Mercenaries in Armed Conflict Katherine Fallah Katherine Fallah Is Ph.D
    Volume 88 Number 863 September 2006 Corporate actors: the legal status of mercenaries in armed conflict Katherine Fallah Katherine Fallah is Ph.D. candidate at the University of Sydney, presently working as a Research Associate to the Judges of the Federal Court of Australia. Abstract Corporate actors are taking on an increasingly significant role in the prosecution of modern warfare. Traditionally, an analysis of the law applicable to corporate actors in armed conflict commences with inquiry into the law as it applies to mercenaries. As such, the rise of the private military industry invites a reconsideration of the conventional approach to mercenaries under international law. This article critically surveys the conventional law as it applies to mercenaries, and considers the extent to which corporate actors might meet the legal definitions of a ‘‘mercenary’’. It demonstrates that even mercenaries receive protection under international humani- tarian law. The debate about the definition and status of mercenaries is not new. It is one which has provoked a polarized response from different groups of nations, with some arguing that mercenary activity should be prohibited outright, and others contending that mercenaries should not receive any differential treatment under international law. In the second half of the twentieth century, objectionsto mercenary activity were grounded in concerns about preserving the right of post-colonial states to self-determination. This approach is reflected in the language adopted by the United Nations in its persistent consideration of the use of mercenaries ‘‘as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise 599 K. Fallah – Corporate actors: the legal status of mercenaries in armed conflict of the right of peoples to self-determination’’.1 Until recently, legal consideration of corporate actors in armed conflict was limited to the question of mercenaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II)
    Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II) Adopted on 8 June 1977 by the Diplomatic Conference on the Reaffirmation and Development of International Humanitarian Law applicable in Armed Conflicts Entry into force: 7 December 1978, in accordance with Article 23 Preamble The High Contracting Parties , Recalling that the humanitarian principles enshrined in Article 3 common to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949 constitute the foundation of respect for the human person in cases of armed conflict not of an international character, Recalling furthermore that international instruments relating to human rights offer a basic protection to the human person, Emphasizing the need to ensure a better protection for the victims of those armed conflicts, Recalling that, in cases not covered by the law in force, the human person remains under the protection of the principles of humanity and the dictates of the public conscience, Have agreed on the following: Part I SCOPE OF THIS PROTOCOL Article 1.-Material field of application 1. This Protocol, which develops and supplements Article 3 common to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949 without modifying its existing conditions of application, shall apply to all armed conflicts which are not covered by Article 1 of the Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and relating to the Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflicts (Protocol I) and which take place in the territory of a High Contracting Party between its armed forces and dissident armed forces or other organized armed groups which, under responsible command, exercise such control over a part of its territory as to enable them to carry out sustained and concerted military operations and to implement this Protocol.
    [Show full text]
  • International Law: Reservations to Multilateral Agreements
    DePaul Law Review Volume 5 Issue 1 Fall-Winter 1955 Article 4 International Law: Reservations to Multilateral Agreements Marcellus R. Meek Follow this and additional works at: https://via.library.depaul.edu/law-review Recommended Citation Marcellus R. Meek, International Law: Reservations to Multilateral Agreements, 5 DePaul L. Rev. 40 (1955) Available at: https://via.library.depaul.edu/law-review/vol5/iss1/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Law at Via Sapientiae. It has been accepted for inclusion in DePaul Law Review by an authorized editor of Via Sapientiae. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INTERNATIONAL LAW: RESERVATIONS TO MULTILATERAL AGREEMENTS MARCELLUS R. MEEK NE of the means by which States as subjects of international law acquire rights from, and undertake obligations toward, other subjects of international law is the formal conclusion of treaties.' A treaty is a source of international law, and, as such, governs to a substantial degree the relations existing between the inde- pendent States of the world. Although treaties have from time to time2 been referred to as con- tracts or compacts between States, it was early agreed that interna- tional transactions, whatever their descriptive designation, were of a higher order and distinguishable in principle from private contracts., But, it has been said, in solving the problems to which the practice of attaching reservations to the signature or ratification of treaties gives rise, the analogy between international treaties and the contracts of 4 private law has been found useful. In an effort to make this statement more readily comprehensible, it might be well at this point to digress for a moment to consider by way of preliminary examination what is meant by the term "reservation." The authorities are not in accord, but, in recent times, the most wide- 1 Schwarzenberger, A Manual of International Law 62 (3d ed., 1952).
    [Show full text]
  • Additional Protocol I to the Geneva Conventions
    0031-0330 irl.qxd 2.3.2009 14:21 Page 233 V PROTOCOL ADDITIONAL TO THE GENEVA CONVENTIONS OF 12 AUGUST 1949, AND RELATING TO THE PROTECTION OF VICTIMS OF INTERNATIONAL ARMED CONFLICTS (PROTOCOL I), OF 8 JUNE 1977 Preamble .................................................................................................... 239 PART I General provisions Article 1 General principles and scope of application............................. 240 Article 2 Definitions ................................................................................. 240 Article 3 Beginning and end of application ............................................. 241 Article 4 Legal status of the Parties to the conflict................................... 241 Article 5 Appointment of Protecting Powers and of their substitute ...... 241 Article 6 Qualified persons....................................................................... 242 Article 7 Meetings..................................................................................... 243 PART II Wounded, sick and shipwrecked SECTION I – General protection Article 8 Terminology............................................................................... 243 Article 9 Field of application .................................................................... 245 Article 10 Protection and care.................................................................... 245 Article 11 Protection of persons................................................................. 245 Article 12 Protection of medical units ......................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of the Geneva Conventions of 1949 and Their Additional Protocols International Humanitarian Law April 2011
    Summary of the Geneva Conventions of 1949 and Their Additional Protocols International Humanitarian Law April 2011 Overview: Protecting the Byzantine Empire and the Lieber Code The Red Cross Vulnerable in War used during the United States Civil War. and International International humanitarian law (IHL) is The development of modern Humanitarian Law a set of rules that seek for humanitarian international humanitarian law is The Red Cross and the Geneva reasons to limit the effects of armed credited to the efforts of 19th century Conventions were born when Henry conflict. IHL protects persons who are Swiss businessman Henry Dunant. In Dunant witnessed the devastating not or who are no longer participating in 1859, Dunant witnessed the aftermath consequences of war at a battlefield hostilities and it restricts the means and in Italy. In the aftermath of that battle, of a bloody battle between French methods of warfare. IHL is also known Dunant argued successfully for the and Austrian armies in Solferino, Italy. as the law of war and the law of armed creation of a civilian relief corps to The departing armies left a battlefield respond to human suffering during conflict. littered with wounded and dying men. conflict, and for rules to set limits on A major part of international Despite Dunant’s valiant efforts to how war is waged. humanitarian law is contained in the mobilize aid for the soldiers, thousands Inspired in part by her work in the four Geneva Conventions of 1949 that died. Civil War, Clara Barton would later have been adopted by all nations in found the American Red Cross and In “A Memory of Solferino,” his book also advocate for the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Istanbul Protocol
    OFFICE OF THE UNITED NATIONS HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS Geneva PROFESSIONAL TRAINING SERIES No. 8/Rev.1 Istanbul Protocol Manual on the Effective Investigation and Documentation of Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment UNITED NATIONS New York and Geneva, 2004 NOTE The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. * * * Material contained in this publication may be freely quoted or reprinted, pro- vided credit is given and a copy of the publication containing the reprinted material is sent to the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, United Nations, 1211 Geneva 10, Switzerland. HR/P/PT/8/Rev.1 UNITED NATIONS PUBLICATION Sales No. E.04.XIV.3 ISBN 92-1-154156-5 ISBN 92-1-116726-4 ISSN 1020-1688 Manual on the Effective Investigation and Documentation of Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment Istanbul Protocol Submitted to the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights 9 August 1999 PARTICIPATING ORGANIZATIONS Action for Torture Survivors (HRFT), Geneva Amnesty International, London Association for the Prevention of Torture, Geneva Behandlungszentrum für Folteropfer, Berlin British Medical Association (BMA), London Center for Research and Application of Philosophy
    [Show full text]
  • Council of Europe Convention on the Prevention of Terrorism *
    Council of Europe Treaty Series - No. 196 Council of Europe Convention on the Prevention of Terrorism * Warsaw, 16.V.2005 The member States of the Council of Europe and the other Signatories hereto, Considering that the aim of the Council of Europe is to achieve greater unity between its members; Recognising the value of reinforcing co-operation with the other Parties to this Convention; Wishing to take effective measures to prevent terrorism and to counter, in particular, public provocation to commit terrorist offences and recruitment and training for terrorism; Aware of the grave concern caused by the increase in terrorist offences and the growing terrorist threat; Aware of the precarious situation faced by those who suffer from terrorism, and in this connection reaffirming their profound solidarity with the victims of terrorism and their families; Recognising that terrorist offences and the offences set forth in this Convention, by whoever perpetrated, are under no circumstances justifiable by considerations of a political, philosophical, ideological, racial, ethnic, religious or other similar nature, and recalling the obligation of all Parties to prevent such offences and, if not prevented, to prosecute and ensure that they are punishable by penalties which take into account their grave nature; Recalling the need to strengthen the fight against terrorism and reaffirming that all measures taken to prevent or suppress terrorist offences have to respect the rule of law and democratic values, human rights and fundamental freedoms as well
    [Show full text]