DOCSLIB.ORG

Beach Corridor Preliminary Engineering Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Beach Corridor Preliminary Engineering Report Preliminary Engineering Report First Draft For the Beach Corridor Rapid Transit Project Project Development and Environment (PD&E) Study Prepared for: MIAMI-DADE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC WORKS Prepared by: Parsons Corporation January 2020 DRAFT Preliminary Engineering Report Beach Corridor Rapid Transit Project Table of Contents PROJECT SUMMARY ................................................................................ 7 1.1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................... 7 1.2. STUDY AREA .................................................................................................................................... 7 1.3. PURPOSE & NEED ........................................................................................................................... 8 1.4. PROJECT CORRIDOR AND SUB-AREAS ..................................................................................... 10 1.5. PROJECT HISTORY ....................................................................................................................... 10 1.6. COMMITMENTS .............................................................................................................................. 11 1.7. LIST OF TECHNICAL DOCUMENTS ............................................................................................. 12 EXISTING CONDITIONS & ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS .... 14 2.1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................. 14 2.2. EXISTING ROADWAY AND STRUCTURES INFRASTRUCTURE ................................................ 14 2.2.1. EXISTING ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS ............................................................................. 14 2.2.2. AESTHETICS AND LIGHTING FEATURES ............................................................................... 16 2.2.3. RAILROAD CROSSINGS............................................................................................................ 19 2.3. EXISTING UTILITIES ...................................................................................................................... 20 2.4. STRUCTURAL CONSIDERATIONS--EXISTING BRIDGES AND CAUSEWAYS .......................... 26 2.4.1. BRIDGE NO. 870771 (WB MACARTHUR CAUSEWAY) AND NO. 870772 (EB MACARTHUR CAUSEWAY) ............................................................................................................................... 26 2.4.2. BRIDGE NO. 870077 (WB AND EB MACARTHUR CAUSEWAY OVER EAST CHANNEL) ...... 27 2.5. EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS ................................................................................................ 27 2.5.1. OVERVIEW OF EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS ANALYSIS................................................ 27 2.5.2. EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS ............................................................................................ 41 2.5.3. EXISTING TRANSIT CONDITIONS ............................................................................................ 59 2.6. FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS ................................................................................................... 65 2.7. EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS ................................................................................. 69 2.7.1. SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC .......................................................................................................... 69 2.7.2. CULTURAL ................................................................................................................................. 73 2.7.3. NATURAL ................................................................................................................................... 75 2.7.4. PHYSICAL .................................................................................................................................. 76 DRAFT Preliminary Engineering Report Beach Corridor Rapid Transit Project DESIGN CONTROLS & CRITERIA .......................................................... 78 3.1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................. 78 3.2. FEDERAL OR NATIONAL REGULATIONS, CODES, AND STANDARDS ................................... 78 3.3. STATE REGULATIONS, CODES, AND STANDARDS .................................................................. 81 3.4. LOCAL JURISDICTIONAL CODES, REQUIREMENTS, AND ORDINANCES .............................. 81 3.4.1. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT DESIGN STANDARDS AND CRITERIA ................................ 81 3.4.2. WATER QUALITY ....................................................................................................................... 81 3.4.3. SEA LEVEL RISE – RESOLUTION R-451-14 AND ORDINANCE 14-79 .................................... 82 ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS .................................................................... 83 4.1. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED ..................................................................................................... 83 4.1.1. PHASED DEVELOPMENT OF ALTERNATIVES – TIER ONE AND TIER TWO ........................ 83 4.1.2. NO-BUILD ALTERNATIVE .......................................................................................................... 84 4.1.3. AUTOMATED PEOPLE MOVER (APM) ALTERNATIVE ............................................................ 85 4.1.4. LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT (LRT)/STREETCAR ................................................................................ 89 4.1.5. MONORAIL ................................................................................................................................. 94 4.1.6. BUS RAPID TRANSIT (BRT) (I-395 & I-195 SUB-ALTERNATIVES) .......................................... 98 4.1.7. MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS FACILITIES ................................................................... 102 4.2. APPROACH TO ALTERNATIVES DEVELOPMENT .................................................................... 104 4.2.1. TRUNK LINE AND EXTENSIONS ............................................................................................ 104 4.2.2. CORRIDOR ALTERNATIVES ................................................................................................... 105 4.2.3. CONTEXTUAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR ALTERNATIVES DEVELOPMENT ......................... 106 4.3. EVALUATION CATEGORIES & CRITERIA .................................................................................. 108 4.3.1. TRANSIT & MULTIMODAL PERFORMANCE .......................................................................... 109 4.3.2. ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS .................................................................................................. 110 4.3.3. COST & FEASIBILITY ............................................................................................................... 111 4.4. EVALUATION METHODOLOGY .................................................................................................. 112 4.4.1. RIDERSHIP FORECASTING .................................................................................................... 112 4.4.2. SERVICE PLAN AND O&M COST ESTIMATING ..................................................................... 113 4.4.3. CAPITAL COST ESTIMATING .................................................................................................. 113 4.4.4. RESILIENCE/SEA LEVEL RISE ............................................................................................... 114 4.5. EVALUATION RESULTS & RECOMMENDED ALTERNATIVE ................................................... 114 4.5.1. APM CORRIDOR ALTERNATIVE EVALUATION SUMMARY .................................................. 117 4.5.2. LRT/STREETCAR CORRIDOR ALTERNATIVE EVALUATION SUMMARY ............................ 118 DRAFT Preliminary Engineering Report Beach Corridor Rapid Transit Project 4.5.3. MONORAIL CORRIDOR EVALUATION SUMMARY ................................................................ 118 4.5.4. BRT CORRIDOR ALTERNATIVES EVALUATION SUMMARY ................................................ 119 4.5.5. EVALUATION SUMMARY-KEY DIFFERENTIATORS BETWEEN MODAL ALTERNATIVES .. 119 4.5.6. EVALUATION SUMMARY-KEY FINDINGS .............................................................................. 120 4.6. RECOMMENDED ALTERNATIVE AND REASONS FOR SELECTION ....................................... 120 PROJECT COORDINATION & PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT ..................... 123 5.1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 123 5.2. TIER ONE EVALUATION .............................................................................................................. 124 5.3. TIER TWO EVALUATION ............................................................................................................. 125 5.4. KICK-OFF MEETINGS .................................................................................................................. 125 5.5. PROJECT ADVISORY GROUP .................................................................................................... 126 5.6. ALTERNATIVES WORKSHOPS ................................................................................................... 126 DESIGN FEATURES OF THE PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE ............... 128 6.1. ENGINEERING DETAILS OF THE PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Travel Demand Model
    TECHNICAL REPORT 6 TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL SEPTEMBER 2019 0 TECHINCAL REPORT 6 TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL This document was prepared by the Miami-Dade Transportation Planning Organization (TPO) in collaboration with the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) District Six, Miami- Dade Expressway Authority (MDX), Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise (FTE), South Florida Regional Transportation Authority (SFRTA), Miami-Dade Department of Transportation and Public Works (DTPW), Miami-Dade Regulatory and Economic Resources (RER) Department, Miami- Dade Aviation Department (MDAD), Miami-Dade Seaport Department, Miami-Dade County Office of Strategic Business Management, City of North Miami, City of Hialeah, City of Miami, City of Miami Beach, City of Miami Gardens, City of Homestead, Miami-Dade County Public Schools, Miami-Dade TPO Citizens’ Transportation Advisory Committee (CTAC), Miami-Dade TPO Bicycle/ Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC), Miami-Dade TPO Freight Transportation Advisory Committee (FTAC), Transportation Aesthetics Review Committee (TARC), Broward County Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO), Palm Beach County Transportation Planning Agency (TPA), and the South Florida Regional Planning Council (SFRPC). The Miami-Dade TPO complies with the provisions of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which states: No person in the United States shall, on grounds of race, color,or national origin, be excluded from participating in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving federal financial assistance. It is also the policy of the Miami-Dade TPO to comply with all the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). For materials in accessible format please call (305) 375-4507. The preparation of this report has been financed in part from the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • State-Of-The-Art Portmiami Tunnel Raises the Bar for Tunnel Construction in North America by Jim Rush
    COVER STORY Photo by Daniel Azoulay – Courtesy of BCWF THINKINGCOVER STORY STATE-OF-THE-ART PortMiami Tunnel Raises the Bar for Tunnel Construction in North America By Jim Rush hen you think about state-of-the-art tunneling existing highway system and bypass surface streets downtown, projects, places like New York, San Francisco which can become congested with cargo trucks and cruise line and Los Angeles immediately jump to mind. buses. In addition to enhancing traffic flow to and from the port, These urban centers, after all, are home to mass the project will help improve quality of life downtown and promote Wtransit systems that weave their way near the surface through development. Envisioned for more than 30 years, the tunnel is well densely populated cities and in proximity to existing buildings under way and is on schedule to open to traffic in 2014. and utilities. And while some of the projects under way or Challenges associated with the project include keeping the in the planning stages in these areas are indeed pushing the port operations open at all times while constructing tunnels limits of tunneling technology, the PortMiami Tunnel is faced under the Government Cut channel in complex geology that with its own set of challenges in an area that has never seen required extensive ground improvement to allow tunnel boring mega-tunnel projects. operations. Additionally, the PortMiami Tunnel project is The PortMiami Tunnel project involves the construction of unique in the United States in that it is among the first to use a twin tunnels, 4,200 ft in length and 39 ft ID, connecting Watson public-private partnership approach with the private partner – Island and Dodge Island in Biscayne Bay.
    [Show full text]
  • Wynwood Development Table of Contents 03 Project Overview
    TOTAL AREA: 60,238 SQ.FT. Wynwood Development Table of Contents 03 Project Overview 15 Conceptual Drawings 17 Location 20 Demographics 23 Site Plan 26 Building Efficiency 29 RelatedISG Project Overview Project This featured property is centrally located in one of Miami’s hottest and trendiest neighborhood, Wynwood. The 60,238 SF site offers the unique possibility to develop one of South Florida’s most ground-breaking projects. There has only been a select amount of land deals in the past few years available in this neighborhood, and it is not common to find anything over 20,000 SF on average. With its desirable size and mixed use zoning, one can develop over 300 units with a retail component. Wynwood has experienced some of the highest rental rates of any area of South Florida, exceeding $3 per SF, and retail rates exceeding $100 SF. As the area continues to grow and evolve into a world renowned destination, it is forecasted that both residential and retail rental rates will keep increasing. Major landmark projects such as the Florida Brightline and Society Wynwood, as well as major groups such as Goldman Sachs, Zafra Bank, Thor Equity and Related Group investing here, it is positioned to keep growing at an unprecedented rate. Name Wynwood Development Style Development Site Location Edgewater - Miami 51 NE 22th Street Miami, FL 33137 Total Size 60,238 SQ. FT. (1.3829 ACRES) Lot A 50 NE 23nd STREET Folio # 01-3125-015-0140 Lot B 60 NE 23nd STREET Folio 01-3125-011-0330 Lot C 68 NE 23rd STREET Folio 01-3125-011-0320 Lot D 76 NE 23rd STREET Folio 01-3125-011-0310 Lot E 49 NE 23rd STREET Folio 01-3125-015-0140 Lot F 51 NE 23rd STREET Folio 01-3125-015-0130 Zoning T6-8-O URBAN CORE TRANSECT ZONE 04 Development Regulations And Area Requirements DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS AND AREA REQUIREMENTS DESCRIPTION VALUE CODE SECTION REQUIRED PERMITTED PROVIDED CATEGORY RESIDENTIAL PERMITTED COMMERCIAL LODGING RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL LODGING RESIDENTIAL LODGING PERMITTED GENERAL COMMERCIAL PERMITTED LOT AREA / DENSITY MIN.5,000 SF LOT AREA MAX.
    [Show full text]
  • Coast Guard, DHS § 100.701
    Coast Guard, DHS § 100.701 TABLE TO § 100.501—ALL COORDINATES LISTED IN THE TABLE TO § 100.501 REFERENCE DATUM NAD 1983—Continued No. Date Event Sponsor Location 68 .. June 25 and 26, Thunder on the Kent Narrows All waters of Prospect Bay enclosed by the following points: 2011. Narrows. Racing Asso- Latitude 38°57′52.0″ N., longitude 076°14′48.0″ W., to lati- ciation. tude 38°58′02.0″ N., longitude 076°15′05.0″ W., to latitude 38°57′38.0″ N., longitude 076°15′29.0″ W., to latitude 38°57′28.0″ N., longitude 076°15′23.0″ W., to latitude 38°57′52.0″ N., longitude 076°14′48.0″ W. [USCG–2007–0147, 73 FR 26009, May 8, 2008, as forbid and control the movement of all amended by USCG–2009–0430, 74 FR 30223, vessels in the regulated area(s). When June 25, 2009; 75 FR 750, Jan. 6, 2010; USCG– hailed or signaled by an official patrol 2011–0368, 76 FR 26605, May 9, 2011] vessel, a vessel in these areas shall im- EFFECTIVE DATE NOTE: By USCG–2010–1094, mediately comply with the directions at 76 FR 13886, Mar. 15, 2011, the Table to given. Failure to do so may result in § 100.501 was amended by suspending lines No. expulsion from the area, citation for 13, No. 19, No. 21 and No. 23, and adding a new failure to comply, or both. heading and entries 65, 66, 67, and 68, effec- tive Apr. 1, 2011 through Sept. 1, 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • AMR BRDIGITAL Chinese.Pdf
    㽁㷐▙㥳 㢭㲂 300 BISCAYNE BOULEVARD WAY ⿿≐イ 㱱G&G Business Developments⤇㙶⵺➂ 㽁㷐▙㥳 㢭㲂 300 BISCAYNE BOULEVARD WAY ⿿≐イ 㱱G&G Business Developments⤇㙶⵺➂ ⶪ㟫⍙㗰⏥⶙㾗㢜⵺➂㔈☨㽜㐵⒪㗰㔦タᮣ㲣⫉㐟㽜㐵⒪㗰㔦タᱨ㎫⏸ⶌ〉㩩║␋㮾⭆㱱⵺➂㔈㦢⿼⭨⫊Ⓒ㾂㑉㝗⤅☨᮶⟐⿨⹽▕㷦⒴᮷☾Ⱞ㺲㚱㮔㎳☨㢶⮔ 㑆≜よ㗁㮥㺸㊹㢭ᱨ ╚㵒よ㗁㮥㺸㮿㗯 㸊㸡☨よ㱝㱸㋶☳㨲⼵㲓▅㑉㦢㔋☨⻲⼋ᮣ ょ㝢㚴⛞㮾㣐㎮㣐ⲳ☨➝㖷⟁⡙㽥㣄わ☨㔶 ⫆ᱨ㸆㨗➝㖷⫊㦄✚㯁⮑ᱨ⫊㥨㺤㑩㢔ᮣ㮥 㗑⛑㑉☨㖨㙼㨾㖥ᮢ㮥⏩⪮⨄☨㱘㊮ᮢ㮥Ⱞ ⡮㑉㺣㔪☨㴵⿓ᮢ㮥㋁㥑㖺㸈ㅶᮢ㮥╌Ⱐ㑉 ⽃⻸㠰➕☨⟇Ⳃ᮪᮪☕㣄わ㈀㲞よ☨ⰰ㾗㖫ᱨ 㣄わ☨⡮⤵⌧╋⛑⏥㺌⏥ⴇ㺲㣄わ➂㦆㖺ⰻ 㱸⼹㮥➌Ⳃ㦣⧧㯌㯏ᮣ よ㗁㱨⧽☨ᱨⳟ㦡㎣㽂㨲㫖ᮢ㍱㨲╚㵒よ☨ ⤀Ⰷ㮥㬥ᮣ 㚳わ☨⏯⪂ᮢ㝢➶⧧⼵⡮╚㵒⼗ㅗ㮾⤜⼋☨ ⷅ㖺ⲽ㊹ᮣ ║㋨☨☒㔶 㥺タ☨⛢⻮ⲽ㔭㲓⪬⪥☨⺈㖱㵒ⳟ⼗≐㙱 ⛻ᮤ⿷⛃㵀㋽⒝ⰻ⛢㮥㣐✠☨㊹㺬ᮣ 1913ㅰ1㴨15㑓ᱨ⿨⏘㝎ᮤ⊎⡁㝎 (Robert Bamford)⧧⹁≨ㅠ✝ᮤ⿷⛃(Lionel Martin)╚⊚Bamford and Martin⤇㙶ᮣ㵀 ⿡⛺Henniker Mews㮥⢔⮈⾴☨⒝⭺⹽ᱨ 㮥⢔ザ⏥⶙㬀☨⤦㖼㱱╱⵺㋶ᮣ 㚳わ㮾㣐⶙㝪㝔☨㔤⭜㲓ⓞ⹮≼䏡☨㩂ㅢ⏠ ⫉⼗▙㺼☨㦛㦣ᱨ100✂ㅰ⨍㑉わ⛶╱㑒゜ ⼁⏥㮻ᮢ㑥Ⓗ㑥㾍ᮣ1914ㅰ⤇㙶⢚ッ㢜≐ 㙱⛻ᮤ⿷⛃(Aston Martin)ᮣ㸆㮥ⴈ⛊㗖☡ ⹁≨ㅠ✝ᮤ⿷⛃㵀㱊⥖⊅ⱄ⧔⤈⵴≐㙱⛻㓹 㓹☼㋽⒝㑺ᱤAston Hill Climbᱥ㺲⫉㖞☨㋶➂ᱨ 㱱╱⢚ッᱨ㴿⧩㗄⏥⥙ᮣⳌ㸝㮥㺓⛞⽃㝀㵀㣄わ ☨㫖㮤⹽ᮣ㽴⤇㙶⵺╚㮾⹂≐㙱⛻ᮤ⿷⛃ 㮻⒱㢜㮥⢔⍖㺠㩂㊹㈊⒱㢜㔙⪂☨㗐⤀㺨㾗ᮢ 㣐㲓⿡⌴☨よᮢㅗ㮾㺥㨳☨㩂ㅢ㲓⥖⭠㑺㖼 㑗㲦☨■ッ╰ᮣ ≐㙱⛻ᮤ⿷⛃☨ⲽ㚠 ⶄⶄ㣄わ☨㋽⒝ᱨㆀⳟㅢ㝛⪹☡㣄わ☨ⲽ㚠ᮣ ょ㮥⶜☨⭳㖵㝛㬕⛞㑁ㆀ㱨㔶ㅗ㠰ᮣ ㍿Ⲵᮢ㸕➼✚ⲽ㐵ᮢ㱨⧽㫱㺤㎒ⲽ㥨ᱷ㣄わ☨㋽⒝ 㑘⧩⍖㺠㩂☨㔤⭜ᮢ㽟㴣☨⤀㮿㲓㣐⶙㊧☴ ☨㾖⤀ᱨ⤎㟠▘㵒ㅗ㠰☨㎩⡮㝛㬕ᮣ 㽗㎳㠞よ ≐㙱⛻⿷⛃㑉㢜㣄わ☨㋽⒝㽂㑩⼗㔶 ツ⻲ᱨ㣄わ㮾╱㽴⧚ᱨ⌢⡮㸕➼ᮣ㵀▘ 㵒㐩㖺ⰻ㾎㱭よ㋽⒝☨⤎㟠㨳ㅴ☨㯧☠ 㥲ᱨ㣄わ⏥⛱㍰㨾ᮣ ょ⼊㋽⒝☨☒㔶⛞㑘㑩⼗㣄わ⛢㝎☨⭅ 㝛⭒ㅢᮢⳕⲿⶌ㬕☨⤀㮿㲓㥸ⱌ☨⭒㗯ᮣ 㣄わ☨㟹⛵㺤⻲㲂▘㋈⭞⛊☨㠞よ⍖㽜ᱨ ♂㵒⫆⻲㙼㔠㎒Ⓦ〄よ⡮☨ⲽ㽜⤀㮿ᮣ 㸆㺸㺖㽥ᱨ〉㔩㮜ⴊ㣐ⱊ㱸ᮣ ⺈㖱㱮ⳕᱨ㴿╚㢦⹂ Ⳬ㖺㣐㙣☨㔵㠯ᮢ㣐㲓⿡⌴☨⤀㮿ᮢ⤆⢙⮏㨾 ☨⍖㽜ᮣ㮥⢔✂㖺⭣㮾⹂ᱨ≐㙱⛻⿷⛃☨ッ 㽶㮻⒱㢜㋽⒝㔤⭜ⰻ⡽⒔☨■ッ╰ᱨ㮜㗁㐩㖺 ⰻ㾎⳱⍖㺠㩂⧧⍒㖰⛪☨ッ㊮ᮣょ㮥⼊㋽⒝ⴋ 㢜⛊㺨㔶␤☨╥㗐⤀㺨㾗ᱨ㷧㦄㱝㱸㸃☨⢔㩂ᮣ 㢜⼗㖯㦆⛶⿿≐イ㺲㨲300 Biscayne Boulevard Way☨㴞Ⳃᱨ≐㙱⛻⿷⛃㲓㻚 ッ☨⵺➂㔈G&G Business Developments ⤇㙶⧩㾗ᱨ⯿㚵☨║㖺㔤⭜㽊⪇㢜⛢㮥㣐✠☨ ➟␤㦞ㅅᮣ㮥㾙■⍙㽥⛇⭸㔙⪂㔶⫆ᮢ⛢㮥㣐 ✠☨⧚⪂▙㥳⯿≼☼✚㋲ᮣ ⤀㮿Ⰷ㨲⛢㴱 ᮰㵀㣄わ㸆☾㮥⢔㽁㷐⵺➂㦞ㅅ⹽ᱨ㽐㩌 ㅠ㗈㗖☡≐㙱⛻⿷⛃☨㋶➂ᱨ⏌ⶌ⿑⼗⿿≐ イ☨㑆▞㋺⨌ᮣ㣄わ☨㔤⭜⹻ㅴ⫑㲂よ㫓⭆ 㱭㺬㱫⏮ᱨ⮈☉ᮢ╥ⰴᮢ☧㝛✚㱭㫱ᮣょ㮥 ⢔㥨Ⱞ⧧⤀㮿⛞㔴㟬㽥≐㙱⛻⿷⛃☨ DNAᱨⲳ㦄㗠㗄≠㯇ᮣ㸆⛒⯼㻠㗁㢜㨮㔉 ㊹㺬⧧⤀㮿☨㑉ᮢ㢜㑆≜㱨⧽㖼㣡☨㑉✚▘ 㵒ᮣ᮱ MAREK REICHMAN 㺖㨾⡏㽼⏭⭼㗑㥟╚㯌⤵ ≐㙱⛻ᮤ⿷⛃ 㱨⧽☨㦏㝫ᱨ ⨄㢢☨㴞Ⳃ ⲽよ☨㔤⭜⛞㴚㲂㾎⮈☉☨ ㍦⌶⤐⪅ᱨ㚞㺐✚⹂☨⏯㗁㴤
    [Show full text]
  • 5280 Connectors, Public Statement of Qualifications
    Nicholas Farber June 29, 2015 Enterprise Specialist High Performance Transportation Enterprise 4201 E. Arkansas Ave., Room 230 Denver, CO 80222 (720) 248-8544 [email protected] Public Disclosure Statement of Qualification (“Public Disclosure SOQ”) Mr. Farber, I am pleased to submit this Public Disclosure SOQ to the Procuring Authorities for the I-70 East Project on behalf of 5280 Connectors. 5280 Connectors has provided a version of the SOQ that redacts the information specified in Form B (Confidential Contents Index) of the SOQ and other information necessary in order to be consistent with each of the references to the items stated in Form B. Accordingly, in connection with the Request for Qualifications dated March 25, 2015 (as amended by the addendum dated May 29, 2015) (the “RFQ”) issued by the High Performance Transportation Enterprise and the Bridge Enterprise, divisions of the Colorado Department of Transportation, in relation to the I-70 East Project (as defined therein), under penalty of perjury I hereby certify on behalf of 5280 Connectors (the “Proposer”) that the enclosed digital and physical copies of Proposer’s Public Disclosure SOQ (as defined in the RFQ) have been prepared in compliance with Section 5.7.3 of Part B of the RFQ, and I further acknowledge that the Procuring Authorities are relying on my certification to this effect. If you have any questions or would like to discuss any aspect of the foregoing, our redacted SOQ or our Form B, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned. We look forward to working alongside the Procuring Authorities during the RFQ selection process.
    [Show full text]
  • Miami Beach Intermodal Hubs Feasibility Study Final Report
    Miami Beach Intermodal Hubs Feasibility Study Miami Beach Miami Beach Intermodal Hubs FeasibilityIntermodal Study Hubs Feasibility Study Tasks 1 and 2 Partial Report February 2018 Prepared for November 2017 City of Miami Beach Transportation Department Prepared by Page | i Miami Beach Intermodal Hubs Feasibility Study Miami Beach Intermodal Hubs Feasibility Study Final Report Prepared for: City of Miami Beach Transportation Department Prepared by: February 2018 Miami Beach Intermodal Hubs Feasibility Study Miami Beach Intermodal Hubs Feasibility Study Table of Contents Section Page 1.0 Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Overview of Intermodal Transit Centers ....................................................................... 1 1.2 Study Area ................................................................................................................... 2 2.0 Purpose and Need .......................................................................................................... 4 2.1 Project Purpose ........................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Need for the Project ..................................................................................................... 4 3.0 Study Background ........................................................................................................... 6 3.1 Relevant Studies .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Unintentional Fall Injury Hospitalizations, Residents Age 65 and Older, 2007-2009
    Unintentional Fall Injury Hospitalizations, Residents Age 65 and Older, 2007-2009 The areas of the county with the highest elderly unintentional injury hospitalization rates over the 3- year period 2007-2009 were: 1. The zip code 33030 which represent sections of Homestead. 2. The zip code 33182 which represents a section of unincorporated Miami-Dade west of Doral. 3. The zip code 33136 which represents sections of Little Havana in the City of Miami. 4. The zip code 33166 which represents the communities of Miami Springs and Medley. Source: Hospital Discharge Data, Agency for Health Care Administration Unintentional Fall Injury Hospitalizations, Residents Age 65 and Older, 2007-2009 2007 2008 2009 2007-09 Zip Code: Communities hosps hosps hosps Avg. Rate/100,000 33137: Upper E. Side, Wynwood & Little Haiti 39 45 31 1,746.5 33131: Downtown 5 12 12 1,617.9 33145: Coral Way, Shenandoah 95 106 110 1,610.7 33136: Overtown, Allapatttah 23 22 21 1,605.3 33134: Coral Gables, Flagami 115 104 130 1,594.0 33185: Unincorp M-D (W. of Tamiami) 25 18 28 1,562.9 33166: Miami Springs, Medley 47 45 38 1,557.6 33173: Kendall 71 80 99 1,483.5 33129: Coral Way, Brickell 33 29 33 1,480.3 33182: Unincorp M-D (W. of Doral) 12 19 23 1,471.4 33012: Hialeah 216 245 218 1,439.1 33010: Hialeah 138 129 132 1,430.5 33139: South Beach 114 107 111 1,405.3 33126: Flagami, Doral, Airport 107 130 132 1,390.1 33030: Homestead 21 27 38 1,381.2 33175: Kendale Lakes, Tamiami 99 123 108 1,378.7 33014: Miami Lakes, Hialeah 71 64 78 1,372.5 33180: Aventura, Ojus 111 103 109 1,360.0
    [Show full text]
  • SR-836/I-395/I-95) Toi-95 Southbound SR-836 Westbound I-95 Pavement Reconstruction SR-836/I-395 from West Causeway Bridge of I-95 to Macarthur
    community | safety | mobility | maintainability Technical Volume 1: Technical Proposal Technical 1: Volume Technical SR-836 I-95 I-95 SR-836/I-395 Southbound to SR-836 Westbound Southbound SR-836 to Reconstruction Pavement from West of NW 17th Avenue to Midtown Interchange (SR-836/I-395/I-95) Interchange Midtown to of NW 17th Avenue West from from West of I-95 to MacArthur of I-95 to Bridge Causeway West from FDOT DISTRICT 6 SR-836/I-395/I-95 Technical Financial Projects Number(s): I-395 Reconstruction 251688-1-52-01 (F.A.P. 3951-501-1) I-95 Pavement Reconstruction 429300-2-52-01 (F.A.P. 0951-685-1) Volume 1: I-95 SB to SR-836 WB Connector 423126-2-52-01 MDX 423126-1-52-01 Technical Proposal Miami Dade Water & Sewer 251688-1-56-02 MDX Work Program Number: 83611 Contract Number: E-6J53 Copy Transmittal Letter Design and Construction Approach INTRODUCTION 1. Community – Connect communities The SR-836/I-395/I-95 project presents a unique and 2. Safety – Enhance safety extraordinary opportunity to transform Miami by reconnecting 3. Mobility – Improve mobility communities that were once divided, creating a safer 4. Maintainability – Deliver maintainable solutions environment for pedestrian and vehicular traffic, solving mobility These four fundamental objectives served as our guiding challenges that have inhibited traffic for many years, and principles as we developed a comprehensive project approach, developing a cohesive maintenance plan that will preserve Alternative Technical Concepts (ATCs), and Aesthetic Project these community enhancements for years to come. This legacy Technical Enhancements (APTEs).
    [Show full text]
  • Americas Top Artplaces
    America’s Top ArtPlaces 2013 America’s Top 12 ArtPlaces Art is inspiring and motivating. But it is also a powerful catalyst for The selection of these neighborhoods was based on a set of six indicators. change within communities, invigorating neighborhoods, supporting Four indicators measure the ingredients of vibrancy: the number of local businesses, and creating vibrant places where people want to be. retail and service businesses, the percentage of independent businesses, ArtPlace, a collaboration of leading national and regional foundations, the neighborhood’s Walk Score and the percentage of workers in banks and federal agencies, was founded to accelerate “creative creative occupations living in the neighborhood. Then two arts-related placemaking” – that is, putting art at the heart of a portfolio of strategies indicators were added: the number of arts-related non-profits and to revitalize communities in ways nothing else quite can. the number of arts-related businesses. Inside are profiles of the first-ever list of America’s Top ArtPlaces. Finally, neighborhood scores were normalized for family income, so that neighborhoods with the highest concentration of income did Twelve neighborhoods across the country were identified by ArtPlace not skew the results. as most successfully combining art, artists and other creatives, independent businesses, retail shops and restaurants, and walkability The results are 12 exciting, and sometimes surprising, neighborhoods – to make vibrant places. all unique, all deeply local, all relatively recent comeback stories with art at their heart. America’s Top ArtPlaces demonstrate how art and artists are creating the kinds of places people want to be. America’s Top 12 ArtPlaces (in alphabetical order, not ranked) Inside, you’ll get a look at what Brooklyn, NY Oakland, CA makes these communities The intersection of Downtown, Downtown, including Chinatown, America’s Top 12 ArtPlaces.
    [Show full text]
  • Duos Is Especially Aimed at Short to Extended-Stay Guests
    Is coming! The newest oering in the most dynamic and eclectic young neighborhood in Miami: Wynwood. An innovative architectural proposal, to respond to a growing need for comfortable and ecient accommodations in the fastest growing district of this city. Located in the heart of Wynwood, surrounded by art galleries, trendy restaurants, oces and fashion venues, Duos is especially aimed at short to extended-stay guests. The project will deliver aordable comfort in a central location with easy access to the main venues of Miami. DUOS HOTEL / WYNWOOD - MIAMI Location NW 28th St & NW 3rd Ave Duos is centrally located in Wynwood, across the Street from the Wynwood Building and one block from the new Wynwood Garage, on 28th Street, between NW 3rd and 5th Avenue. World famous Wynwood Walls and NW 2nd Avenue are within walking distance, less than 200 meters away. ACCESSIBILITY: From the From the Miami Design District Port of Miami 6min (1.3 miles) 12min (3.7 miles) From the From the 10 Performing Art and Museum 15 Brickell City Center min Centers (2 miles) min (3.6 miles) From the From American Airlines Arena South Beach 10min (2.3 miles) 15min (6.5 miles) From the From the Miami International Airport Miami Beach 12min (7 miles) 15min Convention Center (Art Basel) (6.1 miles) North Beach 934 Little River Miami Shores Little Haití Upper East Side Mid Design Beach District Midtown Miami International Allapattah Airport Edgewater WYNWOOD A1A South Beach Little Port of Miami Havana (Dodge Island) Downtown Riverside Fisher Brickell Island Coral Gables CITY OF MIAMI n a e 913 Virginia Key c Coconut Grove O c ti n la At Key Biscayne DUOS HOTEL / WYNWOOD - MIAMI Once just a warehouse district, the renaissance of Wynwood started about 15 years ago, rapidly Wynwood becoming the preferred destination of artists, who freely express their creativity inside and outside, and along the walls of the once vacant The Art District buildings.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Move... Miami-Dade County's Pocket
    Guide Cover 2013_English_Final.pdf 1 10/3/2013 11:24:14 AM 111 NW First Street, Suite 920 Miami, FL 33128 tel: (305) 375-4507 fax: (305) 347-4950 www.miamidade.gov/mpo C M On the Y CM MY Move... CY CMY K Miami-Dade County’s Pocket Guide to Transportation Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) 4th Edition Table of Contents Highway Information Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) p. 1 FDOT’s Turnpike Enterprise p. 2 Florida Highway Patrol p. 2 95 Express Lanes p. 3 Miami-Dade Expressway Authority (MDX) p. 4 SunPass® p. 5 511-SmarTraveler p. 5 Road Rangers p. 5 SunGuide® Transportation Management Center p. 6 Miami-Dade Public Works and Waste p. 7 Management Department Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) p. 8 Driving and Traffic Regulations p. 8 Three Steps for New Florida Residents p. 9 Drivers License: Know Before You Go p. 9 Vehicle Registration p. 10 Locations and Hours of Local DMV Offices p. 10-11 Transit Information Miami-Dade Transit (MDT) p. 12 Metrobus, Metrorail, Metromover p. 12 Fares p. 13 EASY Card p. 13 Discount EASY Cards p. 14-15 Obtaining EASY Card or EASY Ticket p. 15 Transfers p. 16-17 Park and Ride Lots p. 17-18 Limited Stop Route/Express Buses p. 18-19 Special Transportation Services (STS) p. 20 Special Event Shuttles p. 21 Tax-Free Transit Benefits p. 21 I Transit Information (Continued) South Florida Regional Transportation Authority p. 22 (SFRTA) / TriRail Amtrak p. 23 Greyhound p. 23 Fare & Schedule Information p. 24 Local Stations p.
    [Show full text]