Beach Corridor Preliminary Engineering Report

Beach Corridor Preliminary Engineering Report

Preliminary Engineering Report First Draft For the Beach Corridor Rapid Transit Project Project Development and Environment (PD&E) Study Prepared for: MIAMI-DADE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC WORKS Prepared by: Parsons Corporation January 2020 DRAFT Preliminary Engineering Report Beach Corridor Rapid Transit Project Table of Contents PROJECT SUMMARY ................................................................................ 7 1.1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................... 7 1.2. STUDY AREA .................................................................................................................................... 7 1.3. PURPOSE & NEED ........................................................................................................................... 8 1.4. PROJECT CORRIDOR AND SUB-AREAS ..................................................................................... 10 1.5. PROJECT HISTORY ....................................................................................................................... 10 1.6. COMMITMENTS .............................................................................................................................. 11 1.7. LIST OF TECHNICAL DOCUMENTS ............................................................................................. 12 EXISTING CONDITIONS & ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS .... 14 2.1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................. 14 2.2. EXISTING ROADWAY AND STRUCTURES INFRASTRUCTURE ................................................ 14 2.2.1. EXISTING ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS ............................................................................. 14 2.2.2. AESTHETICS AND LIGHTING FEATURES ............................................................................... 16 2.2.3. RAILROAD CROSSINGS............................................................................................................ 19 2.3. EXISTING UTILITIES ...................................................................................................................... 20 2.4. STRUCTURAL CONSIDERATIONS--EXISTING BRIDGES AND CAUSEWAYS .......................... 26 2.4.1. BRIDGE NO. 870771 (WB MACARTHUR CAUSEWAY) AND NO. 870772 (EB MACARTHUR CAUSEWAY) ............................................................................................................................... 26 2.4.2. BRIDGE NO. 870077 (WB AND EB MACARTHUR CAUSEWAY OVER EAST CHANNEL) ...... 27 2.5. EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS ................................................................................................ 27 2.5.1. OVERVIEW OF EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS ANALYSIS................................................ 27 2.5.2. EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS ............................................................................................ 41 2.5.3. EXISTING TRANSIT CONDITIONS ............................................................................................ 59 2.6. FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS ................................................................................................... 65 2.7. EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS ................................................................................. 69 2.7.1. SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC .......................................................................................................... 69 2.7.2. CULTURAL ................................................................................................................................. 73 2.7.3. NATURAL ................................................................................................................................... 75 2.7.4. PHYSICAL .................................................................................................................................. 76 DRAFT Preliminary Engineering Report Beach Corridor Rapid Transit Project DESIGN CONTROLS & CRITERIA .......................................................... 78 3.1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................. 78 3.2. FEDERAL OR NATIONAL REGULATIONS, CODES, AND STANDARDS ................................... 78 3.3. STATE REGULATIONS, CODES, AND STANDARDS .................................................................. 81 3.4. LOCAL JURISDICTIONAL CODES, REQUIREMENTS, AND ORDINANCES .............................. 81 3.4.1. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT DESIGN STANDARDS AND CRITERIA ................................ 81 3.4.2. WATER QUALITY ....................................................................................................................... 81 3.4.3. SEA LEVEL RISE – RESOLUTION R-451-14 AND ORDINANCE 14-79 .................................... 82 ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS .................................................................... 83 4.1. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED ..................................................................................................... 83 4.1.1. PHASED DEVELOPMENT OF ALTERNATIVES – TIER ONE AND TIER TWO ........................ 83 4.1.2. NO-BUILD ALTERNATIVE .......................................................................................................... 84 4.1.3. AUTOMATED PEOPLE MOVER (APM) ALTERNATIVE ............................................................ 85 4.1.4. LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT (LRT)/STREETCAR ................................................................................ 89 4.1.5. MONORAIL ................................................................................................................................. 94 4.1.6. BUS RAPID TRANSIT (BRT) (I-395 & I-195 SUB-ALTERNATIVES) .......................................... 98 4.1.7. MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS FACILITIES ................................................................... 102 4.2. APPROACH TO ALTERNATIVES DEVELOPMENT .................................................................... 104 4.2.1. TRUNK LINE AND EXTENSIONS ............................................................................................ 104 4.2.2. CORRIDOR ALTERNATIVES ................................................................................................... 105 4.2.3. CONTEXTUAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR ALTERNATIVES DEVELOPMENT ......................... 106 4.3. EVALUATION CATEGORIES & CRITERIA .................................................................................. 108 4.3.1. TRANSIT & MULTIMODAL PERFORMANCE .......................................................................... 109 4.3.2. ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS .................................................................................................. 110 4.3.3. COST & FEASIBILITY ............................................................................................................... 111 4.4. EVALUATION METHODOLOGY .................................................................................................. 112 4.4.1. RIDERSHIP FORECASTING .................................................................................................... 112 4.4.2. SERVICE PLAN AND O&M COST ESTIMATING ..................................................................... 113 4.4.3. CAPITAL COST ESTIMATING .................................................................................................. 113 4.4.4. RESILIENCE/SEA LEVEL RISE ............................................................................................... 114 4.5. EVALUATION RESULTS & RECOMMENDED ALTERNATIVE ................................................... 114 4.5.1. APM CORRIDOR ALTERNATIVE EVALUATION SUMMARY .................................................. 117 4.5.2. LRT/STREETCAR CORRIDOR ALTERNATIVE EVALUATION SUMMARY ............................ 118 DRAFT Preliminary Engineering Report Beach Corridor Rapid Transit Project 4.5.3. MONORAIL CORRIDOR EVALUATION SUMMARY ................................................................ 118 4.5.4. BRT CORRIDOR ALTERNATIVES EVALUATION SUMMARY ................................................ 119 4.5.5. EVALUATION SUMMARY-KEY DIFFERENTIATORS BETWEEN MODAL ALTERNATIVES .. 119 4.5.6. EVALUATION SUMMARY-KEY FINDINGS .............................................................................. 120 4.6. RECOMMENDED ALTERNATIVE AND REASONS FOR SELECTION ....................................... 120 PROJECT COORDINATION & PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT ..................... 123 5.1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 123 5.2. TIER ONE EVALUATION .............................................................................................................. 124 5.3. TIER TWO EVALUATION ............................................................................................................. 125 5.4. KICK-OFF MEETINGS .................................................................................................................. 125 5.5. PROJECT ADVISORY GROUP .................................................................................................... 126 5.6. ALTERNATIVES WORKSHOPS ................................................................................................... 126 DESIGN FEATURES OF THE PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE ............... 128 6.1. ENGINEERING DETAILS OF THE PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    154 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us