DOCSLIB.ORG

Hum-Korpus33-2.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Hum-Korpus33-2.Pdf ,6%1 ,6%1 ,6%1 ,6%1 TWO FACES OF PIŁSUDSKI ON THE EXAMPLE OF CONTEMPORARY MEDIA DISCOURSE mgr Joanna Kukier PhD student, Maria Curie-Skłodowska University [email protected] A few words about media discourse Discourse is a communication event thanks to which it is possible to convey a message using language, determine the state of knowledge and hierarchy of values and communication through media channels [1]. On the other hand, media discourse is: “a set of ways of purposeful, not accidental use of language to communicate information, opinions, values, concepts, media views on various topics”. Małgorzata Lisowska-Magdziarz assumes that media texts located in contemporary communities should be discussed as part of the aforementioned discourse [2, pp. 6-18]. Nowadays we cannot imagine a world without media: they are a source of information; they describe the world that surrounds us and dictate interpretations. Press, television and internet users should acquire skills for critical and thoughtful reception of media content. Discourse determines what both parties of the communication process know about the world and how they can apply this knowledge in any given situation. It is conditioned in a cultural, social and historical way. Teun van Dijk considers discourse to be a structure that we can perceive in three dimensions: the act of using the language itself, inclusion of an idea in discourse and establishing social interaction [3, p. 10]. For the purposes of this article we will focus on one of the functions of discourse: the unveiling of the relationship between power and society and the positioning in the social hierarchy of value of a charismatic politician who has incited extreme feelings both in the past and today. The purpose of this article is to look at the cult of Józef Piłsudski and a dualistic approach to him on the example of contemporary media discourse. The article will be an attempt to answer how we look at the legend of the Marshal from the perspective of the 21st century and what remains of his symbol. Another important aspect that is worth addressing is the dispute about the person of the Commander and showing how Józef Piłsudski is included in the media discourse from two perspectives of his opponents and supporters. The materials on which the article is based are primarily historical magazines, which are a good piece of knowledge worthy of scientific analysis. In contrast, two video materials will allow for an assessment of the atmosphere in contemporary discourse. The text will be an attempt to synthesize media science issues with a historical introduction. At the source of the legend Józef Piłsudski (1867-1935) has served as marshal since 1920. He gained ВИПУСК 33 (том 2) 5 military experience and worked to regain independence. From 1918, he was the commander-in-chief of the Polish Army and created the Polish Legions. We must not forget that he was a politician [4]. Considering the public opinion and the position of those in power, we can conclude that modern society respects Marshal Józef Piłsudski and his media image is characterized positively. However, how we perceive this historical figure depends on the environment in which we live every day. Józef Piłsudski is a person who raises a lot of controversy. Regardless of that fact, he is still one of the most colorful characters who are on the pages of our history. In 1928, Wojciech Kossak painted “Marshal Józef Piłsudski on Kasztanka”. Kossak presented battle-scenes and history in his art. He identified with these kinds of paintings because he was a soldier himself. In 1927, the Marshal posed for the famous painter. Józef Piłsudski dominated the canvas in a majestic pose on his favorite chestnut colored mare. In the picture, the main character is depicted in the prime of life, although at that time Józef Piłsudski was already past that time. The image was to evoke the chief’s greatest successes, which is why the image evokes associations with the battlefield. The soldiers surrounding the commander symbolize his good contact with subordinates [5]. How does Polish society currently perceive the image of Józef Piłsudski? Some looking at the picture would describe the Leader as a confident, majestic figure proudly looking at the battlefield. Others, however, would see more of a propagandist dimension of the image than deserved idealization. Nowadays Józef Piłsudski is the patron of many streets, squares and schools. Monuments and commemorative plaques were created - including one on Litewski Square in Lublin, and the figure of the Marshal inscribed in the canon of Polish national heroes. Chief or collaborator? The cult of Józef Piłsudski began to function even when he himself held a leadership position. Why did it start so early? First, the biography of the Commander was already intriguing, his attentive observers sought controversy in him and interpreted the details of his life in a way that worked for their advantage. Secondly, this situation was compounded by the multitude of thread of hope provided by Józef Piłsudski. For many, he was the embodiment of the dream of a free homeland. They saw him as a hero and compared him to great Polish personas such as Mickiewicz, Słowacki, Kościuszko or Poniatowski. Interest in his person began already at the beginning of World War I, prior to the events which brought fame to Józef Piłsudski. After Poland regained independence his cult began to grow. He was titled commander, resurrectionist of Poland or commander-in-chief. This term is marked positively. Also, the term “Grandfather”, which evokes a negative association, was to emphasize his role in Polish society. National Democrats used the echoing Battle of Warsaw of 1920 for social manipulation, which involved the mythologization of Józef Piłsudski. According to E. Maj: they attempted to degrade Piłsudski in the process of preparing and 6 ГУМАНІТАРНИЙ КОРПУС implementing the Battle of Warsaw plan and tried to present negatively the image of the winner from Kiev, they denied perceiving him as a political genius and, when referring to previous achievements, they argued that the enforcement of Polish actions in the fight for independence by establishing Legions, did not play a key role in the case of Poland [6, p. 500]. Attempts at degradation also occurred in other historical fields. Józef Piłsudski was accused of making political mistakes: he misdiagnosed the European situation, sympathized with central states and had anti-national preferences. Even remembrance dates became the subject of investigation by the oppositions, e.g. the celebration of the name day on March 19 was criticized and the celebration of May 12-14 was questioned. Opponents of Józef Piłsudski set the public to disapprove of symbolic signs or recognize “Miracle on the Vistula” only as interference of the higher forces. To diminish the role of the “legend” they called the Marshal “a fallen legend”[6, p. 512]. Adolf Nowaczyński, Władysław Grabski or Stanisław Stroński are just a few characters who instigated public opinion against the uncritical adoration of the Marshal. Józef Piłsudski died in 1935. Crowds came to his funeral and worshiped him. That the society would develop in the spirit of Piłsudski was to be ensured by the specially appointed Supreme Remembrance Committee. One of the aims of the organization was to provide patronships for organizations to ensure that they would not ridicule the chief. An extreme example was the desire to canonize him; to recognize him as a patron or to name part of land after him [7, p. 244]. After the death of Józef Piłsudski, various people wrote about him - some of them interacted with him every day, while others haven’t seen him. It was widely believed that one should talk about the Hero as much as possible. Some of the publications had to be withdrawn from the bookstores due to their weak substantive value [8, p. 12]. One such publication was the book of general Felicjan Sławoj-Składkowski. Nationalists in every function of Piłsudski depreciated his merits and refused to have the politician as a resurrectionist of Poland [6, p. 524]. In 1938, the Sejm adopted the Act on “Protection of the property of Józef Piłsudski, the first Marshal of Poland”. It dictated a sentence of up to five years imprisonment if anyone dared to desecrate the memory of the deceased. It was an attempt to regulate the Marshal’s worship. The act was signed by politicians such as Ignacy Mościcki, who served as president at the time, Felicjana Składkowski and Witold Grabowski. It did not take long for the act to sow its crops. In 1938, Stanisław Cywiński in Dziennik Wileński presented an article in which he called Józef Piłsudski a “cabotine”. The offices of Dziennik Wileński were demolished by officers and the author himself was beaten and arrested. This controversial case became popular and acted as inflammatory link for the creation of the Act on the Protection of the Name [9]. The conflict over the Marshal was already under control when in 1926 the supporters of Józef Piłsudski took over. In the official discourse a positive image of the Chief was prominent. The extremist defenders of the good name of Józef Piłsudski resorted to physical violence. This shows not only the example of Stanisław Cywiński, but also Tadeusz Dołęga-Mostowicz, ВИПУСК 33 (том 2) 7 the creator of “Career of Nikodem Dyzma” or Adolf Nowaczyński, also a man of letters [7, p. 244]. The charismatic figure that Józef Piłsudski was, was also met with negative interpretations. Opponents of the Marshal closely watched his every move before him supporters began to dominate the political scene. The opposing encampment built an alternative biography, dragging out unsavory facts from Piłsudski’s life.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • They Fought for Independent Poland
    2019 Special edition PISMO CODZIENNE Independence Day, November 11, 2019 FREE AGAIN! THEY FOUGHT FOR INDEPENDENT POLAND Dear Readers, The day of November 11 – the National Independence Day – is not accidentally associated with the Polish military uni- form, its symbolism and traditions. Polish soldiers on almost all World War I fronts “threw on the pyre their lives’ fate.” When the Polish occupiers were drown- ing in disasters and revolutions, white- and-red flags were fluttering on Polish streets to mark Poland’s independence. The Republic of Poland was back on the map of Europe, although this was only the beginning of the battle for its bor- ders. Józef Piłsudski in his first order to the united Polish Army shared his feeling of joy with his soldiers: “I’m taking com- mand of you, Soldiers, at the time when the heart of every Pole is beating stron- O God! Thou who from on high ger and faster, when the children of our land have seen the sun of freedom in all its Hurls thine arrows at the defenders of the nation, glory.” He never promised them any bat- We beseech Thee, through this heap of bones! tle laurels or well-merited rest, though. On the contrary – he appealed to them Let the sun shine on us, at least in death! for even greater effort in their service May the daylight shine forth from heaven’s bright portals! for Poland. And they never let him down Let us be seen - as we die! when in 1920 Poland had to defend not only its own sovereignty, but also entire Europe against flooding bolshevism.
    [Show full text]
  • A Legal Nihilism in the Political and Legal Practice of the Sanation Camp 1926–1935
    Pobrane z czasopisma Studia Iuridica Lublinensia http://studiaiuridica.umcs.pl Data: 27/09/2021 07:49:16 Articles Studia Iuridica Lublinensia vol. XXIX, 5, 2020 DOI: 10.17951/sil.2020.29.5.133-147 Wawrzyniec Kowalski Military University of Technology, Poland ORCID: 0000-0002-7426-9593 [email protected] From May to Bereza: A Legal Nihilism in the Political and Legal Practice of the Sanation Camp 1926–1935 Od maja do Berezy. Nihilizm prawny w praktyce ustrojowej i prawnej sanacji 1926–1935 SUMMARY The article is an attempt to outline the manifestations of the legal and political system’s nihilism, the occurrence of which the author to some extent attributes to the policy of the Piłsudski political camp after 1926. The subject of the study is to determine the attitude of the leading activists of the Sanation camp to the political system practice and legal practice, seen for the purposes of this thesis as a certain set of actions contra legem and praeter legem in relation to the legal system in force. The author also analyzes UMCSthe implications of J. Piłsudski’s lack of a concrete, in formal and legal terms, political program on the attitude of the Sanation political camp in relation to the application of law and on the legal security. The legal system turned out to be a factor significantly hindering the realization of the post-May camp’s plans as well as the effectiveness of the political system’s initia- tives undertaken by the Piłsudski political camp. The main reason for the post-May camp’s frequent recourse to activities that are to some extent attributed to the legal or political system’s nihilism was the lack of deeper political intentions of the victor of the May Coup d’État.
    [Show full text]
  • What Do We Remember About the Second Polish Republic? (Revision)
    What do we remember about the Second Polish Republic? (revision) What do we remember about the Second Polish Republic? (revision) Lesson plan (Polish) Lesson plan (English) What do we remember about the Second Polish Republic? (revision) Gdynia, Marine Staon, MS Piłsudski Source: Henryk Poddębski, before 1938, Wikimedia Commons, licencja: CC 0. Link to the lesson You will learn to describe the most important events of interwar Poland; to talk about new facts from the history of interwar Poland; characterize the most important figures/characters of the Second Polish Republic. Nagranie dostępne na portalu epodreczniki.pl nagranie abstraktu World War I (or the Great War) broke out in 1914 as a result of the conflicting interests of European powers. It ended in the autumn of 1918 with the defeat of Central Powers. Millions of soldiers died, European countries plunged into an economic crisis. A wave of revolution swept through Europe, which resulted in the abolition of the Russian, German and Austro‐Hungarian monarchies. Thanks to Józef Piłsudski and Roman Dmowski, and as a result of favorable circumstances, Poland regained its independence. Initially, the Polish state was limited to the western parts of the Austrian and Russian partitions. The fight for the changing of borders lasted several years. A successful uprisings against Germany broke out in Greater Poland. As a result of three uprisings and the plebiscite in Upper Silesia, Poland obtained a third part of these areas. The reborn Polish Army took the fight to the east, first with the Ukrainians over Lviv, and then with the Soviet Russia. The Polish victory at the battle of Warsaw in August 1920 (the so‐called Miracle on the Vistula) was of vital importance.
    [Show full text]
  • The Amendment of August 1926 to the First Polish Constitution of the Second Republic*
    Krakowskie Studia z Historii Państwa i Prawa 2014; 7 (2), s. 317–322 doi: 10.4467/20844131KS.14.022.2263 www.ejournals.eu/Krakowskie-Studia-z-Historii-Panstwa-i-Prawa GRZEGORZ M. KOWALSKI Jagiellonian University in Kraków The Amendment of August 1926 to the first Polish Constitution of the Second Republic* Abstract On the political-legal plane, the direct consequence of the May coup organized by Józef Piłsudski in 1926 was an amendment of the March constitution of 1921. The above amendment was commonly referred to as the August amendment from the name of the month in which the two laws changing the constitution had been passed (2 August 1926). The core of the August amendment consisted in a strengthening of the position of the executive organs of the state at the expense of the Diet and the senate. The president obtained the right to dissolve parliament before the end of its term, following the motion of the ministers’ council. Moreover, the president obtained the prerogatives to pass resolutions with the power of parliamentary laws and obtained new budgetary prerogatives. Parliament, on the other hand, became restricted as regards its powers to pass a no confi dence vote towards the Ministers’ Council or any individual minister. The political conceptions implemented by the interwar government aimed at doing away with the principle of a tri-partite division of state power in favor of a concentration of power in the hands of the state’s president. The above conception had been fully realized in the new constitution of the Republic of Poland of 1935.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fall of the Second Polish Republic
    Georgia Southern University Digital Commons@Georgia Southern Electronic Theses and Dissertations Graduate Studies, Jack N. Averitt College of Summer 2013 Drugi Potop: The Fall of the Second Polish Republic Wesley Kent Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/etd Part of the Diplomatic History Commons, European History Commons, Military History Commons, and the Political History Commons Recommended Citation Kent, Wesley, "Drugi Potop: The Fall of the Second Polish Republic" (2013). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 851. https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/etd/851 This thesis (open access) is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies, Jack N. Averitt College of at Digital Commons@Georgia Southern. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons@Georgia Southern. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 1 DRUGI POTOP: THE FALL OF THE SECOND POLISH REPUBLIC by Wesley Kent (Under the Direction of John W. Steinberg) ABSTRACT This thesis seeks to examine the factors that resulted in the fall of the Second Polish Republic and track its downward trajectory. Examining the Second Republic, from its creation in 1918 to its loss of recognition in 1945, reveals that its demise began long before German tanks violated Poland’s frontiers on 1 September, 1939. Commencing with the competing ideas of what a Polish state would be and continuing through the political and foreign policy developments of the inter-war years, a pattern begins to emerge - that of the Poles’ search for their place in modern Europe. The lead up to the Second World War and the invasion of Poland by the German-Soviet Alliance demonstrates the failure of the Poles to achieve that place.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Politics in Pilsudski's Poland, 1926–1935
    introduction ||| Three Days That Shook the Republic, May 12–15, 1926 When Wincenty Witos (1874–1945), the leader of the right-wing branch of the Polish peasant movement, the Polish People’s Union–Piast (Polskie Stronnictwo Ludowe–Piast, PSL-Piast), entered into a coalition government with other right-nationalist parties on May 10, 1926, riots broke out across Warsaw, Poland’s capital.1 The formation of another “Chjena-Piast”2 gov- ernment, as its detractors referred to the coalition, recalled the devastating in¶ation, unemployment, and worker unrest that had marked Witos’s earlier coalition government of 1923. The sense of desperation in a population al- ready dealing with serious economic and political crisis in the Polish Second Republic was raised to dramatic heights.3 As it happens, the new Witos gov- ernment would last only ¤ve days before it crumbled in the face of a military coup launched by renowned political leader Józef Piêsudski (1867–1935). By the mid-1920s, Piêsudski had already devoted himself to Poland in a variety of remarkable ways: he had been an antitsarist socialist revolution- ary in the Russian partition during the late nineteenth century, a founding member of the pro-independence Polish Socialist Party (PPS), and an early editor of the in¶uential underground socialist newspaper the Worker (Ro- botnik).4 Piêsudski had served as the Second Republic’s head of state from 1918 to 1922, Poland’s ¤rst marshal since 1920, and chief of the general staff from 1918 to 1923. He was a resolute patriot and an indefatigable proponent of Polish independence.
    [Show full text]
  • EDWARD RYDZ-ŚMIGŁY a Political and Military Biography
    EDWARD RYDZ-ŚMIGŁY A Political and Military Biography Ryszard Mirowicz Translated and edited by Gregory P. Dziekonski The copyright over the translation has been granted to the translator by the copyright holder of the original Polish text, and I authorize the University of Washington Libraries to make the full text of the English translation available to readers worldwide. TRANSLATOR’S NOTE The original Polish version of this book was written in the 1980s under communist rule, and remained dormant in a censor’s office for over a year. The author was ordered to alter various references concerning the Teschen dispute in 1938 and the Soviet invasion of Poland in alliance with the Nazis in September, 1939. Although the author expressed satisfaction at the eventual compromise between mandated omissions and academic integrity just prior to publication, the translator has made an attempt to add a few footnotes to provide some balance to the narrative. Regarding the customary problems with geographical locations in multiple languages, most locations described in First World War battles on the eastern front in which the Legions were involved and the post-war military operations in the Ukraine, Byelorussia, and Lithuania are in Polish. Otherwise, respective languages for whichever countries in which the geographic locations happened to be situated at the time are used. English names were used for those which possess them, such as “Warsaw,” “Cracow,” “Kaunas,” etc. Numbered footnotes are mostly identical to those in the original text and are listed at the end of each respective section. Footnotes with an asterisk at the bottom of the page are citations which the translator has added.
    [Show full text]
  • May Coup D'état and Its Consequences
    May Coup d'État and its consequences May Coup d'État and its consequences Lesson plan (Polish) Lesson plan (English) Bibliografia: Maria Dąbrowska, Dzienniki 1914-1965, Warszawa 2009. May Coup d'État and its consequences Ignacy Mościcki arrives at the swear-in ceremony at the Castle. Next to him: Józef Piłsudski and Kazimierz Bartel. Warsaw, June 4, 1926 Source: Leon Jarumski, 1926, domena publiczna. Link to the lesson You will learn what were the causes of J. Piłsudski’s May Coup d'État; what were the documents and photographs from this period and you will be able to characterize the course of the Coup; what were the consequences of the Coup. Nagranie dostępne na portalu epodreczniki.pl Nagranie abstraktu Due to the growing political crisis of the Second Polish Republic, marshal Józef Piłsudski decided to take over the power. On May 12th, 1926, Piłsudski took command of the troops gathered in Rembertów and set out for the capital. He met with president Stanisław Wojciechowski on the Poniatowski bridge. Wojciechowski probably decided not to violate the constitution and not to give in to Piłsudski’s demands to dissolve the government and hand over the power to him. On May 12th, the fights between forces faithful to the government and Józef Piłsudski’s troops began. After three days of fighting, Piłsudski’s forces won and the government resigned. On May 31st, 1926, the parliament approved members of the new cabinet, thereby sanctioning the May Coup d'État. Piłsudski, however, declined to become president, and Ignacy Mościcki was elected for the office. Exercise 1 Tell who was the head of the government overthrown by Piłsudski.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Thought of the Polish Socialist Party Former Revolutionary Faction in the Period of 1928–1939
    Humanities and Social Sciences 2019 HSS, vol. XXIV, 26 (4/2019), p. 83-91 October-December Adam LASKA 1 POLITICAL THOUGHT OF THE POLISH SOCIALIST PARTY FORMER REVOLUTIONARY FACTION IN THE PERIOD OF 1928–1939 The purpose of the article is to analyse the political thought of the Polish Socialist Party former Revolutionary Faction (PSPdFrRew) formed in 1928. The focus is primarily on the PSPdFR's attitude towards issues such as the state, economy, and democracy. The research utilised text analysis and document analysis methods. The results of the research found that the former PSP Revolutionary Faction proclaimed the principles of state socialism and used evolutionary methods to raise the standard of living of workers and introduced the Polish Socialist Republic. Although the PSP former Revolutionary Faction perceived its place in the broadly understood Sanation camp, it had negative attitudes towards the proposals of political, economic and social solutions of conservative and liberal representatives. Despite the often- declared attachment to democracy, the PSPdFR strongly criticised parliamentarism and pro- posed the introduction of strong arm rule. Keywords: Polish Socialist Party Former Revolutionary Faction, political thought, Sanation Camp, Second Republic (1918–1939). 1. INTRODUCTION Emerging in October 1928 from the Polish Socialist Party (PSP) a new political group called the Polish Socialist Party former Revolutionary Faction was a consequence of a num- ber of processes taking place on the political scene of the Second Polish Republic, as well as internal processes developing within the PSP itself. The issue that particularly affected the functioning of the PSP was the attitude of its activists to Józef Piłsudski.
    [Show full text]
  • Citizens, Scarcity and the Breakdown of Democracy In
    CSD Center for the Study of Democracy An Organized Research Unit University of California, Irvine www.democ.uci.edu In 1920, twenty-six out of twenty-eight European states were parliamentary democracies. By 1938, thirteen of these democracies had become dictatorships. This essay is about why these regimes broke down and about the role that ordinary citizens played in the breakdown process. Questions about mass support for antidemocratic movements have been asked by students of fascism since the interwar years themselves. Many of our answers cast the ordinary citizen in an ignoble if not villainous role. The story that emerges repeatedly (though not universally) runs like this: citizens who are inexperienced in the use of democratic freedoms find themselves in new democracies during a time of economic scarcity. Democratically chosen leaders prove incapable of remedying the scarcity, but the untutored citizenry continues to overload the new regimes with excessive demands anyway. The gap between government performance and perceived scarcity continues to widen until finally, the citizenry turns toward extremist parties and against democracy itself. Though the emphases of each story-teller vary substantially, the moral is usually the same: If citizens experience severe material scarcities in new democracies, they don't just get mad, they go mad. They abandon the political center and actively support groups and movements that will destroy the democracy that gave them the freedom to make demands in the first place. This tragic story has been documented with compelling evidence. Indeed, the story's basic logic seems so convincing that we have begun to hear it repeated in recent fearful forecasts about the voting public in Eastern Europe and Russia.
    [Show full text]
  • Józef Piłsudski W Bibliofilstwie
    Organizator JJózefózef Piłssudski.udski. NiepodlegNiepodległośćść. ć ę ęć DDziedzictwo.ziedzictwo. PamiPamięćęć i m a P . o w t Patroni medialni c i z d e i z D . Dziedzictwo. Pami . Dziedzictwo. ć ś ść o o ł ł g e l d o p e i N . i k Partnerzy s d u s sudski. Niepodleg ł i P f e z ó J Józef P zem ieodlegoi arzaie et ednot organizayn amorzd oedzta azoieiego Józef Piłsudski. Niepodległość. Dziedzictwo. Pamięć Józef Piłsudski. Niepodległość. Dziedzictwo. Pamięć Redakcja Tadeusz Skoczek i Jolanta Załęczny Warszawa 2019 Publikację recenzowali do druku: Prof. dr hab. Marian Marek Drozdowski Prof. dr hab. Zbigniew Judycki Na okładce wykorzystano grafikę: Studium portretowe z teki Józef Piłsud- ski w 13 planszach, Zdzisław Czermański, Warszawa 1935, zbiory Mu- zeum Niepodległości w Warszawie, nr inw. Rp. 146/11 Wydawnictwo Muzeum Niepodległości w Warszawie ISBN 978-83-65439-72-7 Muzeum Niepodległości w Warszawie jest instytucją kultury Samorządu Województwa Mazowieckiego Spis treści Tadeusz Skoczek Wstęp. O Piłsudskim w Muzeum Niepodległości ............................. 7 I. Apoteoza Janusz Odziemkowski Józef Piłsudski. Wizje niepodległej Rzeczypospolitej i jej miejsca w Europie ...................................................................................................... 21 Wiesław Jan Wysocki Testament Marszałka ............................................................................... 41 Adam Ostanek Związki Józefa Piłsudskiego ze Lwowem ........................................... 61 Karol Chylak Implikacje myśli politycznej
    [Show full text]
  • 95Th Sitting of the Sejm, 23–25 June 2015
    W PARLAMENTACH EUROPY 95TH SITTING OF THE SEJM, 23–25 JUNE 2015 THE SEJM ADOPTED A RESOLUTION amending the act on maritime safety and some re- CONCERNING THE ELECTION OF THE lated acts; amending the Aviation Law. MARSHAL OF THE SEJM. Deputy Małgorzata Kidawa-Błońska was elected THE SEJM CONSIDERED THE SENATE’S the Marshal of the Sejm (her candidature was sup- RESOLUTIONS CONCERNING THE ACTS ported by 244 Deputies; candidate Deputy Jerzy on the Constitutional Tribunal (some of the Sen- Wenderlich obtained 43 votes). ate’s amendments were accepted); Małgorzata Kidawa-Błońska was born on May 5, amending the act on the commune government and 1957 in Warsaw. She graduated from the Faculty some related acts (some of the Senate’s amendments of Philosophy and Sociology of the University of were accepted); Warsaw. amending the Electoral Code (the Senate’s amend- ments were accepted); A politician and film producer, Deputy for the Sejm of the 5th, 6th and 7th term, First Vice-President of the amending the act on the functioning of cooperative Civic Platform Parliamentary Club, since 2014 – sec- banks, their associations, and associating banks, and retary of the state at the Chancellery of the Prime some related acts (some of the Senate’s amendments Minister, in 2014 – spokesperson of the government were accepted); of Donald Tusk, in 2015 – spokesperson of the gov- amending the act on construction products and ernment of Ewa Kopacz. amending the Construction Law (the Senate’s amend- ments were accepted); THE SEJM PASSED THE ACTS amending the Family and Guardianship Code and the Code of Civil Procedure (of prints nos.
    [Show full text]