DOCSLIB.ORG

Global Public Policies and Programs: Implications for Financing and Evaluation Proceedings from a World Bank Workshop

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Global Public Policies and Programs: Implications for Financing and Evaluation Proceedings from a World Bank Workshop GlobalPublicPolicies_0515.qxd 8/15/01 9:21 AM Page i WORLD BANK OPERATIONS EVALUATION DEPARTMENT Global Public Policies and Programs: Implications for Financing and Evaluation Proceedings from a World Bank Workshop Edited by Christopher D. Gerrard Marco Ferroni Ashoka Mody 2001 The World Bank www.worldbank.org/html.oed Washington, D.C. GlobalPublicPolicies_0515.qxd 8/15/01 9:21 AM Page ii Copyright ©2001 The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/THE WORLD BANK 1818 H Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20433, U.S.A. All rights reserved Manufactured in the United States of America First printing June 2001 1 2 3 4 04 03 02 01 The opinions expressed in this report do not necessarily represent the views of the World Bank or its member governments. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this pub- lication and accepts no responsibility whatsoever for any consequence of their use. The boundaries, col- ors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this volume do not imply on the part of the World Bank Group any judgment on the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or accept- ance of such boundaries. The material in this publication is copyrighted. The World Bank encourages dissemination of its work and will normally grant permission promptly. Permission to photocopy items for internal or personal use, for the internal or personal use of specific clients, or for educational classroom use is granted by the World Bank, provided that the appropriate fee is paid directly to the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, U.S.A., telephone 978–750–8400, fax 978–750–4470. Please contact the Copyright Clearance Center before photocopying items. For permission to reprint individual articles or chapters, please fax your request with complete information to the Republication Department, Copyright Clearance Center, fax 978–750–4470. All other queries on rights and licenses should be addressed to the Office of the Publisher, World Bank, at the address above, or faxed to 202–522–2422. ISBN 0–8213–4952–X Library of Congress Cataloging-Publication Data Global public policies and programs : implications for financing and evaluation / edited by Christopher D. Gerrard, Marco Ferroni, Ashoka Mody. p.cm. Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 0–8213–4952–X 1. World Bank—Congresses. 2. International Monetary Fund—Congresses. 3. Economic assistance— Planning—Congresses. 4. Technical assistance—Planning—Congresses. 5. Environmental policy— International cooperation—Congresses. 6. Medical assistance—Planning—Congresses. 7. Educational assistance—Planning—Congresses. I. Gerrard, Christopher D., 1951– II. Ferroni, Marco A., 1948– III. Mody, Ashoka. HG3881.5.W57 G55 2001 338.91—dc21 2001035187 GlobalPublicPolicies_0515.qxd 8/15/01 9:21 AM Page iii This volume is based on a workshop that was organized by UNDP Evaluation Office World Bank Development Economics World Bank Operations Evaluation World Bank Resource Mobilization and Cofinancing With financial support from The Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation GlobalPublicPolicies_0515.qxd 8/15/01 9:21 AM Page iv GlobalPublicPolicies_0515.qxd 8/15/01 9:21 AM Page v Contents IX FOREWORD Robert Picciotto XIII ACKNOWLEDGMENTS XV CONTRIBUTORS XXV ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS OPENING REMARKS 1 The World Bank and Global Public Goods Jan Piercy 7 UNDP and Global Public Goods Khalid Malik 13 PART I: KEYNOTE ADDRESS 15 Financing International Public Goods: A Historical Overview and New Challenges Richard N. Cooper 27 Floor Discussion 31 PART II: PANEL DISCUSSION 33 Six Reasons for a Global Public Goods Perspective on Development Inge Kaul 39 The Intersection of Development Assistance and International Public Goods Ravi Kanbur 43 Walking the Talk: Global Public Policy in Action Wolfgang Reinicke 49 Floor Discussion 55 PART III: ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES 57 A Water-Secure World Ismail Serageldin 65 Floor Discussion GlobalPublicPolicies_0515.qxd 8/15/01 9:21 AM Page vi vi Global Public Policies and Programs 71 The Prototype Carbon Fund: Mobilizing Private and Public Resources to Combat Climate Change Ken Newcombe 79 Discussion: The Carbon Fund in the Bigger Picture Scott Barrett 83 The World Commission on Dams: Lessons Learned About Setting Global Standards John Briscoe 89 Floor Discussion 97 PART IV: HEALTH ISSUES 99 Creating Markets for New Vaccines Michael Kremer 107 WHO, Global Public Goods, and Health Research and Development Dean Jamison 113 Floor Discussion 123 PART V: KNOWLEDGE ISSUES 125 Lessons from the CGIAR: A Perspective from the South Francisco J. B. Reifschneider 131 Knowledge and Global Public Goods: Implications of the WTO’s TRIPS Agreement Jayashree Watal 139 The CGIAR at a Crossroads? Henry Shands 145 Reforming the Intellectual Property Rights System Carlos Correa 149 Floor Discussion 155 PART VI: ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL GOVERNANCE 157 Global Financial Stability: Recent Achievements and Ongoing Challenges Morris Goldstein 163 Promoting Financial Stability as a Global Public Good Barry Eichengreen 171 Renovating the World’s Financial Architecture Matthew Fisher 175 Floor Discussion GlobalPublicPolicies_0515.qxd 8/15/01 9:21 AM Page vii Contents vii 181 PART VII: IMPLICATIONS FOR FINANCING GLOBAL PUBLIC GOODS 183 Financing Global and International Public Goods Todd Sandler 193 Financing Global Public Goods Scott Barrett 205 Global Public Goods and Official Development Assistance Karel van Kesteren 209 Floor Discussion 217 PART VIII: IMPLICATIONS FOR EVALUATING GLOBAL PUBLIC POLICIES AND PROGRAMS 219 Evaluating Global Public Policies and Programs Michael Scriven 223 Participatory or Bottom-up Evaluations: Preventing Global Public Goods from Becoming Club Goods Frans Leeuw 227 Important Questions for Evaluation Greg Ingram 231 Floor Discussion 237 ANNEX 239 Participants GlobalPublicPolicies_0515.qxd 8/15/01 9:21 AM Page viii GlobalPublicPolicies_0515.qxd 8/15/01 9:21 AM Page ix Foreword Robert Picciotto The volatility of cross-border private capital flows, the uncertain fate of na- tions disconnected from the knowledge-based global economy, and the en- vironmental stresses associated with current consumption patterns call for new approaches to the development assistance business. A combination of market failure and limited institutional capacity to in- fluence economic and social change across national borders underlies pub- lic discontent with aid. The time has come to reshape the development architecture to take account of the growing integration of the global econ- omy. It is now widely recognized that aid works better in countries that adopt fair, favorable, and predictable rules of the game for trade and investment. But the magic of the market has limits, especially for the poorest countries. The growing inequality and instability associated with globalization call for new development initiatives to help reduce poverty. Beyond supporting mar- ket-friendly reforms, aid strategies must be designed to overcome social and structural constraints to sustainable development. A reconsideration of development assistance practices has become nec- essary to emulate changes that have already taken hold in the private and voluntary sectors. By now, globalization has revolutionized the behavior of private entrepreneurs and financiers in open economies. A far-reaching trans- formation is also under way in civil society, with the advent of global al- liances of nongovernmental organizations. The emerging development assistance paradigm will be characterized by shared international develop- ment goals, improved coordination, harmonized practices, and reduced trans- action costs. GlobalPublicPolicies_0515.qxd 8/15/01 9:21 AM Page x x Global Public Policies and Programs The change process has just begun. Development assistance is still prof- fered largely through the funding of investment projects. These are not al- ways selected to be consistent with the demanding requirements of poverty reduction strategies. Yet, unless projects are specifically designed to improve policies and/or build institutions, they are not justified for external funding given the imperatives of development effectiveness under the globalized de- velopment order. The share of aid resources devoted to global policies and programs is still very small even though national economies are buffeted by global market trends, knowledge has overtaken capital as the main factor of production, and public policy specifically adapted to the integrated global economy has replaced public investment as the engine of growth. As long as national governments held sway over the commanding heights of the economy, the development system was bound to be focused on proj- ect financing and country-based plans. But it is by now clear that the weak- ening of national public bureaucracies to make room for a burgeoning civil society—as well as far-flung multinational businesses—calls for fundamen- tal adjustments in the modalities of development assistance. To be sure, a large gap needs to be filled in the provision of national pub- lic goods. Aid flows are still far too small to trigger and sustain the reform of economic, social, and environmental policies in developing countries. But increasingly the new development paradigm will have to make room for sup- port to global public policies and programs. Critical development problems that cannot be handled at the country level alone are rising in intensity. As a result, businesslike partnerships will grad- ually supplant national
Load more

Recommended publications
  • World Bank Document
    POLICY RESEARCH WORKING PAPER 2112 Public Disclosure Authorized IndustrialPolicy after BeforeEastAsia's hnancial meltdown in 1997, many the East Asian Crisis believed that the entrepreneurial state Fromc"Outward Orientation" contributed to the East Asian Public Disclosure Authorized From "Outward Orientation "miracle"by accelerajrng to New Internal Capabilities? industrial deveiopment in a "market-friendly" way. The Ashoka Mody now-evoiving internaLional consensuson induseriSaUolicy emphasizes a hands-off approach, with acrivust government playing a reduced role and competition Public Disclosure Authorized policy playing an important role. But imoDlerernincj such a policy wUil require sophisticated nevt' skills in public administration. Public Disclosure Authorized The World Bank Development Prospects Group May 1999 POLICY RESEARCH WORKING PAPER 21 12 Summary findings Before East Asia's financial meltdown in the second half But policies emphasizing greater competition and a of 1997, there appeared to be prospects for an uneasy level playing field - implicitly thought to require less consensus on the East Asian "miracle," a consensus that government action - may require more government recognized the role of the entrepreneurial state in expertise, not less. If implementing a 10 percent export accelerating industrial development but emphasized the subsidy is difficult, consider the difficulty of determining "market-friendly" nature of the state's interventions. whether a firm is exercising market power or restraining After the financial crisis, East Asian policies and trade. So the prospect of governments stepping back may institutions are once again under scrutiny -for their be unrealistic. failures rather than for their miracles. The new consensus also proposes "deep integration," Mody finds that the prospects for a consensus that or the adoption of uniform standards in such areas as incorporated the East Asian experience were ill founded.
    [Show full text]
  • Development Financing
    DRAFT, FOR COMMENTS ONLY NOT FOR CITATION Half a Century of Proposals for ‘Innovative’ Development Financing Barry Herman Background Paper World Economic and Social Survey 2012 2 20 July 2012 HALF A CENTURY OF PROPOSALS ON ‘INNOVATIVE’ FINANCING FOR DEVELOPMENT Barry Herman 1 Abstract This paper recalls the history of proposed “innovative” mechanisms by which governments could strengthen financial cooperation for development. Such proposals sought more predictable and assured financial flows to facilitate recipient country programming, while also substantially adding to the volume of highly concessional international support for development. International discussions of these proposals mostly began in the 1960s and in many cases continue today, although implementation thus far has been modest. These discussions are contrasted with generally more recent proposals that proponents call “innovative” but that do not share the characteristics of the more radical thinking underlining the older proposals. Governments, international institutions, civil society organizations and academic writers have been showing a growing interest in “innovative” financing for development in their discussions of international cooperation on economic, social and environmental policy matters. Although the term “innovative” connotes something recently invented, many of the proposals that carry that name today have a long history, most of it in the political wilderness. Today some of the old as well as new “innovations” are somehow being implemented on a limited basis or discussed in national legislative bodies, as the term “innovative financing” gains a positive political connotation and broader endorsement. Nevertheless, different parties have different concepts in mind about what makes an initiative “innovative.” Definitions are “by definition” arbitrary, but, it seems the term has become so elastic that it has lost any hope of a precise meaning.
    [Show full text]
  • Trade and Labour Mario Pianta
    University of Urbino From the SelectedWorks of Mario Pianta 2001 Trade and labour Mario Pianta Available at: https://works.bepress.com/mario_pianta/62/ Global Trade and Globalising Society Challenges for Governance and Sustainability: the Role of the EU Proceedings of a dialogue workshop held in Brussels on 14-15 December 2000 Edited by Angela Liberatore and Nikolaos Christoforides Brussels, November 2001 PREFACE Preface Fostering dialogue between researchers, policymakers and citizens The European Union is undergoing radical changes in its social, economic, political, technological, demographic, cultural and institutional structure. These changes range from the establishment of a common currency to the introduction of a European citizenship, from new family structures to new ways of working, all this while Europe is enlarging and acting in a global context. Research can play a constructive role in understanding those changes, identifying opportunities and risks, assessing the feasibility, acceptability and impacts of different policy options. Such constructive role however can only be played if research enters in sustained dialogue with those who are at the same time potential users of research, actors of change, and holders of important forms of practical knowledge. In other words, research should not only aim at ‘communicating its results’ to the people ‘outside’ the research system, but should also ‘listen to and learn from’ the experience and concerns of the various social actors or- as it is often said- the various ‘stakeholders’. The ‘dialogue workshops’ series organised within the Key Action ‘Improving the socio-economic knowledge base’ intends therefore to improve multidirectional communication –as opposed to unidirectional diffusion of information- in relation to a number of different but related issues and functions.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Goods for Economic Development
    Printed in Austria Sales No. E.08.II.B36 V.08-57150—November 2008—1,000 ISBN 978-92-1-106444-5 Public goods for economic development PUBLIC GOODS FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FOR ECONOMIC GOODS PUBLIC This publication addresses factors that promote or inhibit successful provision of the four key international public goods: fi nancial stability, international trade regime, international diffusion of technological knowledge and global environment. Each of these public goods presents global challenges and potential remedies to promote economic development. Without these goods, developing countries are unable to compete, prosper or attract capital from abroad. The undersupply of these goods may affect prospects for economic development, threatening global economic stability, peace and prosperity. The need for public goods provision is also recognized by the Millennium Development Goals, internationally agreed goals and targets for knowledge, health, governance and environmental public goods. Because of the characteristics of public goods, leaving their provision to market forces will result in their under provision with respect to socially desirable levels. Coordinated social actions are therefore necessary to mobilize collective response in line with socially desirable objectives and with areas of comparative advantage and value added. International public goods for development will grow in importance over the coming decades as globalization intensifi es. Corrective policies hinge on the goods’ properties. There is no single prescription; rather, different kinds of international public goods require different kinds of policies and institutional arrangements. The Report addresses the nature of these policies and institutions using the modern principles of collective action. UNITED NATIONS INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION Vienna International Centre, P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Towards Different Conversations About the Internationalization of Higher Education Sharon Stein University of British Columbia, [email protected]
    Comparative and International Education / Éducation Comparée et Internationale Volume 45 | Issue 1 Article 2 May 2016 Towards Different Conversations About the Internationalization of Higher Education Sharon Stein University of British Columbia, [email protected] Vanessa Andreotti University of British Columbia, [email protected] Judy Bruce University of Canterbury, [email protected] Rene Suša University of Oulu, [email protected] Recommended Citation Stein, Sharon; Andreotti, Vanessa; Bruce, Judy; and Suša, Rene (2016) "Towards Different Conversations About the Internationalization of Higher Education," Comparative and International Education / Éducation Comparée et Internationale: Vol. 45: Iss. 1, Article 2. Towards different conversations about the internationalization of higher education Vers des conversations différentes au sujet de l’internationalisation de l’enseignement supérieur Sharon Stein, University of British Columbia Vanessa de Oliveira Andreotti, University of British Columbia Judy Bruce, University of Canterbury Rene Suša, University of Oulu Abstract As institutional commitments to internationalize higher education continue to grow, so does the need to critically consider both the intended purposes and actual outcomes of the programs and policies that result. In particular, there is a risk that internationalization efforts may contribute to the reproduction of harmful historical and ongoing global patterns of educational engagement. In this paper we explore these issues by offering a social cartography of four possible articulations of internationalization, and considering their relation to an often-unacknowledged global imaginary, which presumes a colonial hierarchy of humanity. We also address the practical and pedagogical possibilities and limitations of enacting each articulation within mainstream institutional settings, and propose that social cartographies offer a means of reframing and deepening engagement with the complexities, tensions, and paradoxes involved in internationalizing higher education.
    [Show full text]
  • Education Policy Research and the Global Knowledge Economy1
    ACCESS: CONTEMPORARY ISSUES IN EDUCATION 2000, VOL. 19, NO. 2, 204–213 Education policy research and the global knowledge economy1 Michael Peters University of Auckland ABSTRACT In this paper, first, I sketch the importance of three discourses leading to the notion of the "knowledge economy" and I outline a common conception of the notion. Second, I discuss two recent policy constructions of the "knowledge economy" commenting at the same time on implications for education policy. Third, I mention some criticisms of these constructions and introduce Joseph Stiglitz's notion of knowledge as a global public good, and, finally, lay out some of the tasks of educational policy research in its contribution to the debate. Knowledge is and will be produced in order to be sold; it is and will be consumed in order to be valorised in a new production: in both cases, the goal is exchange. Jean-François Lyotard, The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge, 1984, p. 4. We live in a social universe in which the formation, circulation, and utilization of knowledge presents a fundamental problem. If the accumulation of capital has been an essential feature of our society, the accumulation of knowledge has not been any less so. Now, the exercise, production, and accumulation of this knowledge cannot be dissociated from the mechanisms of power; complex relations exist which must be analysed. Michel Foucault, Remarks on Marx: Conversations with Duccio Trombadori 1991, p. 165. Introduction The body of literature on the concept of the "knowledge economy" is both recent and rapidly growing, especially in the related fields of economics and management, yet both less recognised and less established in the field of education.
    [Show full text]
  • 2013 Annual Report
    Annual Report www.bruegel.org ABOUT BRUEGEL 2 BRUEGEL ANNUAL REPORT 2013 CONTENTS CHAIRMAN’S MESSAGE P.5 DIRECTOR’S INTRODUCTION P.6 ABOUT BRUEGEL P.7 BRUEGEL AT A GLANCE P.8 RESEARCH STRATEGY P.12 EVALUATION P.13 REVIEW TASK FORCE P.14 TALENTS P.16 STAFF LIST P.17 A NEW DIRECTOR P.19 RESIDENT SCHOLARS P.20 A GLOBAL NETWORK OF TALENTS P.22 IDEAS P.24 THE YEAR IN REVIEW P.25 OUTREACH IN 2013 P.32 GOVERNANCE P.34 GOVERNANCE MODEL P.35 A NEW BOARD P.36 MEMBERS P.37 VALUES P.38 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS P.39 AUDITOR’S REPORT P.43 ANNEX P.45 PUBLICATIONS IN 2013 P.46 BRUEGEL BLOG IN 2013 P.48 EVENTS IN 2013 P.49 PARLIAMENTARY TESTIMONIES IN 2013 P.52 RESEARCH PARTNERSHIPS (2010-2013) P.53 BRUEGEL ANNUAL REPORT 2013 CHAIRMAN’S MESSAGE “A year marked by novelty, risk, challenges and decision making.” In many respects, 2013 was a turning point for Bruegel – a year from policy impact to financial efficiency. Both groups commended marked by novelty, risk, challenges and decision making. I am proud the organization’s independence and credibility, while also warning to report that, in this process, the organisation not only proved of challenges ahead and showing the way towards continued its solidity and its worth but also explored new areas for shaping improvement. Their conclusions inform Bruegel’s research strategy, economic policy. infused with fresh thinking for the next three years. Since it started operations nine years ago, Bruegel established three- Nine years into the job of improving the quality of economic policy, year cycles as relevant timeframes to Bruegel thus is able to both look back and plan and assess its work.
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    United Nations Development Programme Evaluation Office (UNDP/EO) Chinese National Center for Science and Te c h n o l o gy Evaluation (NCSTE) The World Bank Operations Evaluation Depart m e n t / World Bank Institute (OED/WBI) Public Disclosure Authorized EVALUATION CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT IN ASIA Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized EVALUATION CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT IN ASIA Selected Proceedings from the International Conference B e i j i n g, October 1999 Edited by Khalid Malik and Christine Roth United Nations Development Programme Evaluation Office (UNDP/EO) Chinese National Center for Science and Te c h n o l o gy Evaluation (NCSTE) The World Bank Operations Evaluation Department and World Bank Institute (WBI) The views expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of the United Nations or the United Nations Developement Programme. © Evaluation Office 2000 Evaluation Office United Nations Developement Programme One United Nations Plaza New York, NY 10017, USA Design: Julia Ptasznik, Colonial Communications Corp. Cover Photograph: David Kinley/UNDP CONTENTS Foreword .......................................................................................................... v Acronyms ....................................................................................................... vii Executive Summary ........................................................................................ ix P a rt I: The Evolving Context for ECD 1. Opening
    [Show full text]
  • New Millennium, New Perspectives UNU Millennium Series
    New millennium, new perspectives UNU Millennium Series Series editors: Hans van Ginkel and Ramesh Thakur The UNU Millennium Series examines key international trends for peace, governance, human development, and the environment into the twenty- first century, with particular emphasis upon policy relevant recommenda- tions for the United Nations. The series also contributes to broader aca- demic and policy debate concerning the challenges that are faced at the international level at the turn of the Millennium, and envisions potential for partnerships among states, international organizations, and civil soci- ety actors in collectively addressing these challenges. New millennium, new perspectives: The United Nations, security, and governance Edited by Ramesh Thakur and Edward Newman © The United Nations University, 2000 The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not neces- sarily reflect the views of the United Nations University. The United Nations University 53-70, Jingumae 5-chome, Shibuya-ku, Tokyo, 150-8925, Japan Tel: +81-3-3499-2811 Fax: +81-3-3406-7345 E-mail: [email protected] http://www.unu.edu United Nations University Office in North America 2 United Nations Plaza, Room DC2-1462-70, New York, NY 10017, USA Tel: +1-212-963-6387 Fax: +1-212-371-9454 E-mail: [email protected] Cover design by Joyce C. Weston Printed in the United States of America UNUP-1054 ISBN 92-808-1054-5 Contents Tables and figures . vii 1 Introduction . 1 Ramesh Thakur 2 Security and governance in the new millennium: Observations and syntheses . 7 Edward Newman Security 3 The Security Council in the 1990s: Inconsistent, improvisational, indispensable? .
    [Show full text]
  • The Hyperglobalization of Trade and Its Future
    Working Paper Series WP 13-6 JULY 2013 The Hyperglobalization of Trade and Its Future Arvind Subramanian and Martin Kessler Abstract Th is paper describes seven salient features of trade integration in the 21st century: Trade integration has been more rapid than ever (hyperglobalization); it is dematerialized, with the growing importance of services trade; it is democratic, because openness has been embraced widely; it is criss-crossing because similar goods and investment fl ows now go from South to North as well as the reverse; it has witnessed the emergence of a mega-trader (China), the fi rst since Imperial Britain; it has involved the proliferation of regional and preferential trade agreements and is on the cusp of mega-region- alism as the world's largest traders pursue such agreements with each other; and it is impeded by the continued existence of high barriers to trade in services. Going forward, the trading system will have to tackle three fundamental challenges: In developed countries, the domestic support for globalization needs to be sustained in the face of economic weakness and the reduced ability to maintain social insurance mechanisms. Second, China has become the world’s largest trader and a major benefi ciary of the current rules of the game. It will be called upon to shoulder more of the responsibilities of maintaining an open system. Th e third challenge will be to prevent the rise of mega-regionalism from leading to discrimi- nation and becoming a source of trade confl icts. We suggest a way forward—including new areas of cooperation such as taxes—to maintain the open multilateral trading system and ensure that it benefi ts all countries.
    [Show full text]
  • The New Public Finance
    OVERVIEW THE NEW PUBLIC FINANCE RESPONDING TO GLOBAL CHALLENGES EDITED BY INGE KAUL PEDRO CONCEIÇÃO Published for The United Nations Development Programme New York Oxford Oxford University Press 2006 “This book is a landmark—it provides the important beginnings of a field that will be tilled for years to come.” Excerpt from the Prologue to The New Public Finance JOSEPH E. STIGLITZ Nobel Laureate in Economics (2001), Columbia University “This is a bold and penetrating compilation of papers on the most profound chal- lenges of modern public finance—how to construct better partnerships between governments and private sector players and how to strengthen cooperation between nations in pursuit of common interests.” TREVOR A. MANUEL MP; Minister of Finance, Republic of South Africa “The New Public Finance shows how we can equip people and countries for the future—for a new global economy that combines greater prosperity and fairness both within and across nations. The New Public Finance is important reading for today’s policymakers.” RT HON GORDON BROWN MP; Chancellor of the Exchequer, United Kingdom “As the global economy widens its reach, the principles and instruments of pub- lic finance face new problems and tasks. This volume takes an imaginative and down-to-earth look at the problems and the policy instruments needed to resolve them. It is a volume not to be missed.” RICHARD A. MUSGRAVE Harvard University “The New Public Finance is a real eye-opener. It is a must for everyone with an interest in international developments in economics, law, business, and intergov- ernmental relations.” SIJBREN CNOSSEN University of Maastricht “The problems facing policymakers in a globalized world require international cooperation.
    [Show full text]
  • Measuring Well-Being for Development and Policy Making 16-19 October 2012
    Measuring Well-Being for Development and Policy Making 16-19 October 2012 For nearly a decade the OECD has led international reflection on the measurement of well-being and progress, principally through three world fora held in Palermo, Italy in 2004, Istanbul, Turkey in 2007 and Busan, Korea in 2009. These events have helped to develop a shared sense of common purpose and direction among the many agencies active in developing more relevant statistics on well-being and progress. In May last year, on the occasion of the Organisation’s 50th Anniversary, the OECD Secretary-General launched the OECD Better Life Initiative. This Initiative, through the How’s Life? report and its associated Your Better Life Index (BLI), proposes a framework that gives a more comprehensive picture of what matters in people’s lives. The Better Life Initiative framework, inspired by the recommendations in the Stiglitz-Sen-Fitoussi report and the many on- going national initiatives to measure well-being and societal progress, includes eleven dimensions of material conditions and quality of life and focuses on outcomes – both averages and across population groups. It also looks at our imprint today on a range of resources that will shape well-being in the future. In May this year, the BLI was updated to reflect improvements to the index and to enable comparisons by gender and income inequality. This framework is potentially relevant for all countries around the world. Indeed, in a recent resolution, the UN General Assembly called for a “more holistic approach to development”, putting the notion of well-being and sustainability at the core of the reflections on the design of goals and indicators after 2015.
    [Show full text]