Voices in the City

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Voices in the City Voices in the city Urban renewal projects in Istanbul: A locus of contestations and demonstrations Maaike Wentink Supervisor: Dr. J. Jansen Master thesis: Cultural Anthropology & Development Sociology Leiden University, June 2014 Cover picture: Documentary screenshot Ekumenopolis 2012 Contents Preface 2 Chapter 1 – The case of Turkey 1.1 Introduction 4 1.2 Constructing history and building a future 6 1.3 Methodology 10 1.4 Theoretical background 17 Chapter 2 – The case of Taksim 2.1 Introduction 22 2.2 Gezi Park: The home of the real ҫapulcu 24 2.3 Taksim Square area: A space of legacies and demonstrations 29 2.4 More than meets the eye 33 Chapter 3 – The case of Tophane 3.1 Introduction 35 3.2 Gentrification in Tophane 37 3.3 The silence of Tophane 40 3.4 Same symbols different meaning 44 Chapter 4 – Localising neoliberalism in Istanbul 4.1 Introduction 46 4.2 The problem of social housing 48 4.3 A global city, a local meaning 51 4.4 A city we have lost 54 Chapter 5 – Conclusion: Small places, large issues 5.1 Introduction 58 5.2 Concluding Taksim & Tophane: A sense of belonging 61 Literature list 67 1 Preface In Istanbul, the impact of globalisation and neoliberalism can be seen in a dramatic ways. While the government enables gigantic and often controversial construction projects such as, shopping malls and the so-called social mass housing projects, it seems there is a complete disappearance of poor neighbourhoods. Istanbul truly appears to be the city without limits, experiencing an unstoppable growth, and a rapidly changing skyline. As we will see in this thesis, neoliberalism can be seen as a contested phenomenon that influences society at multiple levels. On the one hand neoliberalism follows the principle of reducing state interference in the market, but does not necessarily lead to a reduction of state control over society. In this thesis I provide critical reflections on urban renewal projects in Istanbul, as government and municipal bodies are trying to upgrade the present-day city to a modern world city. I focus on two case studies, the public urban space of the Taksim area and the neighbourhood of Tophane, and I analyse them in the context of the processes of globalisation and neoliberalism. I emphasize the dynamism of urban change by showing how on the one hand top- down political agendas are pushed by global forces, and on the other hand, civic actors defend spaces in the city to which they feel attached to. By highlighting some significant historic events I explain why certain places or symbols in the urban environment are important for different social groups, and how the desire to protect these spaces and symbols led to the Gezi protests during the summer of 2013. Although many social groups were represented during the Gezi protests, not every social group sees urban renewal as a threat because it can also provides new ways of earning income. In addition, several projects are designed to stimulate tourism which creates new jobs in the tourism industry while local shop keepers can sell their product to tourists. Nevertheless, some social groups feel alienated from the place they were “born and raised” as urban renewal changes the face of the city, and other groups face eviction as neighbourhoods undergo gentrification. Therefore, many citizens are demanding influence in the decision making processes concerning urban change in order to protect what is important for them in the urban environment using narratives like citizenship and democracy. I conclude this thesis by stating that it is not the government alone that is responsible for the socially painful situation the city is currently in since urban policies are impacted by global forces. Nevertheless, citizens are calling for recognition by the 2 government that they belong to the city and need a place to live, as they simultaneously demand from the government the right to protect spaces in the city they feel attached to. Throughout this thesis I will show that urban space is not the space for conflict, but an object of struggle itself. 3 Chapter 1 – The case of Istanbul 1.1 Introduction Istanbul, the biggest city in Turkey is experiencing some of the fastest changes since the beginning of its existence. The urban environment is being expanded with new structures, forcing the natural environment to step aside for (amongst other things), the many shopping malls, a third bridge over the Bosporus, a third airport and a Olympic stadium built for the Olympic games of 2020.1 The increase in the number of urban renewal projects are stimulated by policies of the ruling AK Party (Justice and Development Party) as these policies attract foreign investors and money making construction projects through a neoliberal economy.2 During these urban renewal projects symbols from different pasts are being removed or changed as an expression of political agendas and results of global processes having a deep impact on different social groups.3 During the summer of 2013, the public resistance started in response to urban development projects undertaken by Istanbul’s municipality and became world news. The resistance started peaceful against the destruction of a historically public park and urban commons, and turned into a resistance that was organized against urbanism that puts the interests of capital over the interests of the citizens of Istanbul (Kuymulu 2013: 275). As Kuymulu states: “Destroying Gezi Park for a shopping mall was packaged as part of a larger project of ‘urban transformation’ – AKP’s euphemism for gentrification – which aims to radically transform one of the most iconic urban centres in Turkey: Taksim 1 In September 2013, the Olympic committee announced that the Olympic games of 2020 were not appointed to Turkey. 2 Although many authors (Aksoy 2012; Catterall 2013; Kuyucu & Ünsal 2010) write about urban transformation in Istanbul, I speak in this thesis of urban renewal. The reason why I choose for urban renewal over urban transformation is that the word transformation implies that something is changed from the original while preserving some of its original state. In Istanbul however, most of the urban environment is being changed without the preservation of some of the original. Therefore I speak of urban renewal, which implies a replacement of a former object and seems more suitable to describe urban processes in Istanbul. 3 There are some anthropologists (see Barnard & Spencer 2002: 510-511) who use the term social structure or social organisation to refer to social groups such as nations, tribes, clans or to define the relation between individual people or the relation with one another (Barnard & Spencer 2002; Radcliffe- Brown 1940). I find it more useful to speak of (different) social groups which are in this thesis defined as such, based on their collective identities, backgrounds, place in the city or feelings concerning a specific topic (etc.). By speaking of social groups instead of social structures or social organisations I would like to emphasize feeling of collectiveness, defining these social groups and producing these social groups. 4 Square” (2013: 275). Or as Göle states about the Gezi protests: “Defending a few trees in Gezi Park is not merely a pretext for political contestation. The plan to destroy this public park in order to construct a shopping mall has aroused a new critical consciousness. The Gezi Occupation Movement, reflects resistance to the extreme urban development of the past ten years” (2013: 8). In this thesis I will explain why Taksim Square is described as iconic and how a critical consciousness produced narratives like citizenship and democracy that are used by citizens to claim certain parts of the city. Due to the AK Party’s agenda of stimulating construction projects through neoliberal policies, it is tempting to see urban change in Turkey as a political or economic act alone but of course other motivations for urban change are also involved. Many projects are undertaken out of an economic perspective to stimulate tourism or are an expression of modern living standards, while the city is also developed in order to endure earthquakes. Nevertheless, more than often within urban renewal projects political statements are being made. For example, the third bridge over the Bosporus that is currently under construction is said to be presented by the AK Party government as necessary for economic growth. However, the name of the third bridge, Yavuz Sultan Selim is contested for the Alevis community living in Turkey because of the Alevis massacre that happened in 1514 under this sultan’s reign. This leads to the consequence that many Alevis prefer not to use this bridge. Therefore the third bridge may be built from an economic point of view, the project has an underground dimension that is considered highly sensitive for specific social groups because of the name it is given. The case of the third bridge is an illustration of how symbolism in urban renewal projects is of significance for different social groups, even on the subtle level of the name of a project and influences how different social groups experience or are even excluded from specific urban spaces. Istanbul’s contested story of urban renewal is not unique in the world. Hence, cities and their urban spaces have always been the domain of politics and arenas for public discourse and expressions of discontent (Low 2000: 204). For example, when rulers use public urban space to document their achievements they contribute to the face of a city through symbols that represent ideas about (national) identity that make cities into a public domain (ibid.). On its way to become a modern world city Istanbul faces a mixture of difficulties concerning processes of globalisation and neoliberalism negotiating multiple identities like European, Asian, secular, Islamic and liberal, preferring certain 5 histories over others, all of which manifested themselves in the Gezi movements of 2013.4 This makes Istanbul an ideal site to study contested politics and symbolism in urban renewal projects and the significance of the public urban environment for different social groups.
Recommended publications
  • Cultural Production and Urban Locality in the Fields of Jazz and Fashion Design: the Case of Kuledibi, Istanbul
    CULTURAL PRODUCTION AND URBAN LOCALITY IN THE FIELDS OF JAZZ AND FASHION DESIGN: THE CASE OF KULEDİBİ, İSTANBUL A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES OF THE MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY BY ALTAN İLKUÇAN IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN THE DEPARTMENT OF SOCIOLOGY SEPTEMBER 2013 Approval of the Graduate School of Social Sciences Prof.Dr. Meliha Altunışık Director I certify that this thesis satisfies all the requirements as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Prof. Dr. Ayşe Saktanber Head of Department This is to certify that we have read this thesis and that in our opinion it is fully adequate, in scope and quality, as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Assoc. Prof. Dr. Helga Rittersberger-Tılıç Supervisor Examining Committee Members Assist. Prof. Dr. Eminegül Karababa (METU-MAN) Assoc. Prof. Dr. Helga Rittersberger-Tılıç (METU-SOC) Assoc. Prof. Dr. Tahire Erman (BİLKENT-POLS) Assoc. Prof. Dr. Sibel Kalaycıoğlu (METU-SOC) Assoc. Prof. Dr. Erdoğan Yıldırım (METU-SOC) I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all material and results that are not original to this work. Name, Last name: Altan İlkuçan Signature : iii ABSTRACT CULTURAL PRODUCTION AND URBAN LOCALITY IN THE FIELDS OF JAZZ AND FASHION DESIGN: THE CASE OF KULEDİBİ, İSTANBUL İlkuçan, Altan Ph.D., Department of Sociology Supervisor: Assoc. Prof. Dr. Helga Rittersberger-Tılıç September 2013, 230 pages This study aims to analyze the relationship between cultural producers in Istanbul and the wider processes of neoliberal urban restructuring that takes in their surroundings.
    [Show full text]
  • The Protection of Historical Artifacts in Ottoman Empire: the Permanent Council for the Protection of Ancient Artifactsi
    Universal Journal of Educational Research 7(2): 600-608, 2019 http://www.hrpub.org DOI: 10.13189/ujer.2019.070233 The Protection of Historical Artifacts in Ottoman Empire: The Permanent Council for the i Protection of Ancient Artifacts Sefa Yildirim*, Fatih Öztop Department of History, Faculty of Science and Letters, Ağrı İbrahim Çeçen University, Turkey Copyright©2019 by authors, all rights reserved. Authors agree that this article remains permanently open access under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 International License Abstract The historical artifacts that reveal the social, establishment, functioning, duties and activities of the political, aesthetic, moral, architectural, etc. stages, before-said council are tried to be explained. through which the human beings have been; which transfer and reveal information from past to present and Keywords Historical Artifacts, Protection of future; which have an artistic, historical or archaeological Historical Artifacts, Council importance are very important physical elements that the present-day civilized societies protect or must protect as cultural values. Such works both strengthen the ties to the past due to the transfer of cultural heritage to existing and 1 . Introduction future generations and plays a very important role in the writing of the past through the data provided to the The first initiative for the protection of the historical researchers. The protection of the historical artifacts was artifacts in the Ottoman Empire can be considered as the under sharia laws until 1858 in Ottoman Empire, since beginning of the storage of two collections of old weapons then, some regulations were done about this issue, in the and artifacts since 1846 in the Hagia Irene Church end, The Permanent Council for the Protection of Ancient (Sertoğlu & Açık, 2013, p.160).
    [Show full text]
  • Galata and Pera 1 a Short History, Urban Development Architecture and Today
    ARI The Bulletin of the İstanbul Technical University VOLUME 55, NUMBER 1 Galata and Pera 1 A Short History, Urban Development Architecture and Today Afife Batur Faculty of Architecture, Istanbul Technical University, Taşkışla, 34437, Taksim, Istanbul, Turkey Keywords: Galata, Pera, Urban development, Architectural development The coastal band stretching from the to be more prominent starting from 10th northern shores of the Golden Horn until century onwards. The conditions that had Tophane and the slopes behing it have been created the Medieval Galata were being known as Galata since the 8th century. formed in these trading colonies. At first Formerly this area was known as Sycae Amalfi, then the Venetians and later the (Sykai), or as peran en Sykais, which Pisans had obtained special privileges from essentially means ‘on opposite shore’. the Byzantines. The Genovese, who had It is thought that Galata’s foundation established themselves on the southern preceded that of Constantinopolis. The shores of the Golden Horn as a result of archaeological finds here indicate that it their rights recognized by Emperor Manuel was an important settlement area in Comnenos I (1143-1186), were forced to Antiquity. Although its borders can not be move over to Pera on the opposite shore determined precisely, it is known that when the Venetians seized their territory during the reign of Emperor Constantin during the Latin invasion of 1204. (324 –337), it was a fortified settlement When the Latins departed from consisting of a forum, a theatre, a church, a Constantinople in 1261, the city was in harbor and bath buildings, as well as 431 complete ruins.
    [Show full text]
  • Catalogue:March 2020 #1
    CATALOGUE: MARCH 2020 #1 - A large collection of over 500 mostly pulp novels and magazines in Ottoman language, influenced by the Western roaring 20s, especially by the Silent Movies. - Books on the early 20th Century Magic and Supernatural from the Islamic World. - A series of books by the most prominent representative of Turkish avantgarde Nâzım Hikmet. - Turkish Mid Century book and poster design - Slovenian books by contemporary artists - And Much More… www.pahor.de Antiquariat Daša Pahor GbR Alexander Johnson, Ph.D. & Daša Pahor, Ph.D. Jakob-Klar-Str. 12 Germany - 80796 München +49 89 27 37 23 52 www.pahor.de [email protected] ANSWERS TO THE MOST COMMON QUESTIONS - We offer worldwide free shipping. - We cover the customs fees, provide all the paperwork and deal with the customs. We send outside the EU daily and we are used to taking over the control of exporting and importing. - For all the manuscripts, ordered from outside the EU, please give us approximately 10 days to deal with the additional paperwork. - We offer a 20% institutional discount. - In case you spot an item, that you like, but the end of the fiscal year is approaching, please do not be afraid to ask. We would be glad to put any objects from our offer aside for you and deal with it at your convenience. - We offer original researches and high resolution scans of our maps and prints, which we are happy to forward to the buyers and researchers on request. - For any questions, please e-mail us at: [email protected]. In 2019 we would like to invite you to our stand at the ASEEES Annual Convention in San Francisco, from November 23rd to 26th.
    [Show full text]
  • Istanbul's Taksim Square and Gezi Park: the Place of Protest and The
    JOURNAL OF ARCHITECTURE AND URBANISM ISSN 2029-7955 print / ISSN 2029-7947 online 2014 Volume 38(1): 63–72 doi:10.3846/20297955.2014.902185 Theme of the issue “City as political space” Žurnalo numerio tema „Miestas kaip politinė erdvė“ ISTANBUL’S TAKSIM SQUARE AND GEZI PARK: THE PLACE OF PROTEST AND THE IDEOLOGY OF PLACE Murat Güla, John Deeb, Cahide Nur Cünükc aDepartment of Architecture, TOBB University of Economics and Technology, Söğütözü Caddesi No. 43, Ankara, Turkey bArchitecture Program, International University of Sarajevo, Hrasnička cesta 15, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina cDepartment of Architecture, Fatih Sultan Mehmet Vakıf University, Merkez Efendi Mah. Mevlevihane Cad., Yenikapı Mevlevihanesi No: 25, Zeytinburnu, Istanbul, Turkey E-mails: [email protected] (corresponding author); [email protected]; [email protected] Received 17 December 2013; accepted 05 March 2014 Abstract. May 2013 saw Istanbul witness a massive public demonstration. The incident began on 28 May when a small group of environmental activists tried to save Gezi Park, one of the most iconic green spaces in the Taksim district of central Istanbul. The park dates back to the 1940s and is well-known as public promenade. The modest demonstration was triggered by a government decision to reconstruct a former Ottoman Artillery Barracks. Within a few days, it developed into a violent uprising on an unpre- cedented scale lasting almost an entire month. Crowds not only gathered in Istanbul but also in many other Turkish cities such as the capital, Ankara. International media broadcast the protests live from Taksim Square turning the Gezi Park protest into an international phenomenon.
    [Show full text]
  • Advocacy Planning in Urban Renewal: Sulukule Platform As the First Advocacy Planning Experience of Turkey
    Advocacy Planning in Urban Renewal: Sulukule Platform As the First Advocacy Planning Experience of Turkey A thesis submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Cincinnati in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Community Planning of the College of Design, Architecture, Art, and Planning by Albeniz Tugce Ezme Bachelor of City and Regional Planning Mimar Sinan Fine Arts University, Istanbul, Turkey January 2009 Committee Chair: Dr. David Varady Submitted February 19, 2014 Abstract Sulukule was one of the most famous neighborhoods in Istanbul because of the Romani culture and historic identity. In 2006, the Fatih Municipality knocked on the residents’ doors with an urban renovation project. The community really did not know how they could retain their residence in the neighborhood; unfortunately everybody knew that they would not prosper in another place without their community connections. They were poor and had many issues impeding their livelihoods, but there should have been another solution that did not involve eviction. People, associations, different volunteer groups, universities in Istanbul, and also some trade associations were supporting the people of Sulukule. The Sulukule Platform was founded as this predicament began and fought against government eviction for years. In 2009, the area was totally destroyed, although the community did everything possible to save their neighborhood through the support of the Sulukule Platform. I cannot say that they lost everything in this process, but I also cannot say that anything was won. I can only say that the Fatih Municipality soiled its hands. No one will forget Sulukule, but everybody will remember the Fatih Municipality with this unsuccessful project.
    [Show full text]
  • Beyond the Riot Zone: Why Taksim Square Matters to Turks by Susannah Cullinane , CNN June 7, 2013 -- Updated 1127 GMT (1927 HKT) CNN.Com
    http://edition.cnn.com/2013/06/07/world/europe/turkey-taksim-square-symbol/ Beyond the riot zone: Why Taksim Square matters to Turks By Susannah Cullinane , CNN June 7, 2013 -- Updated 1127 GMT (1927 HKT) CNN.com Taksim Square: Click on markers to explore the centerpoint of Istanbul's protests. (CNN) -- It's a congested, sprawling transport hub surrounded by 1950s architecture and predominantly used by commuters or tourists to cross the city of Istanbul. But proposed changes to Taksim Square have seen it become the flashpoint for protests that have swept through Turkey in the past week, leaving thousands injured and focusing the world's attention on the government of Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan. Taksim has been no stranger to violence. In 1977, at least 34 protesters died during May Day clashes with police. May 1 rallies in the square were banned in 1980 and were only allowed to legally resume in 2010. On May Day this year, there were riots after city authorities again refused to grant trade unions and youth groups permission to demonstrate in Taksim, blaming construction work being carried out in the square. Professor Ersin Kalaycioglu, professor of political science at Istanbul's Sabanci University, said significantly, Taksim Square was also known as "republic square," because it was built by the Republic of Turkey's founding fathers to commemorate the war of liberation. "Taksim Square is connected to Istiklal Caddesi -- Independence Avenue -- and Cumhuriyet Caddesi -- the Avenue of the Republic. So there is a lot of symbolism that has to do with the Turkish Republic," he said.
    [Show full text]
  • Vorlage Gb12.Qxd
    INTERESSANTES AUS DER STADTGESCHICHTE ISTANBULS FRIEDHÖFE IN GALATA Die Begräbnisstätten definieren in der Regel die Grenzen der Städte. Zur Zeit des Römischen und Byzantinischen Kaiserreiches befand sich ein sol - ches Gebiet zwischen den bis heute erhaltenen Theodosius-Landmauern und den Konstantin- mauern. Nach der Eroberung der Stadt durch die Osmanen wurden auf der europäischen Seite die Gebiete außerhalb der Landmauern bzw. außerhalb der Galata-Mauern und auf der asiatischen Seite die Außengebiete von Üsküdar als muslimische Be- Die mit dem Boot aus Istanbul überführten Lei- gräbnisstätten bestimmt. chen wurden zum Kleinen Friedhof gebracht und Reisende , die ab dem 16. Jahrhundert nach Istan- auf diesem Hügel mit Blick auf das Goldene Horn bul kamen, beschreiben häufig in ihren bildlichen begraben. Aufgrund der Nähe zu Kasımpaşa und Darstellungen und Beschreibungen diese ebenfalls der Werft befanden sich hier viele Seemannsgräber. auch als „Parkflächen” genutzten Friedhöfe. In der Der untere Rand des Friedhofs erstreckte sich bis Galata-Region werden oftmals zwei Bereiche be- zu den Teichen, das obere Ende erstreckte sich von schrieben: Şişhane bis zum Galataturm und nach Norden bis Der muslimische Friedhof, der von Taksim über zum alten Tepebaşı-Garten . Ayaspaşa nach Fındıklı abstieg, wurde Großer Dieser Friedhof wurde ab Mitte des 19. Jh. Stück Friedhof (Büyük Mezaristan / Champ des Morts für Stück zerstört. Als Cemal Pascha zu Beginn des de Pera) genannt. Im Gegensatz dazu wurde der Ersten Weltkriegs Marineminister wurde, wurden Friedhof, der sich auf den Kämmen von Kasım- viele Friedhofssteine und Bäume entfernt. paşa bis Şişhane-Tepebaşı ausbreitete und von Kuledibi nach Tophane abfiel, Kleiner Friedhof Die letzten verbliebenen Steine am Rande von (Küçük Mezaristan / Petit Champ des Morts de Yüksekkaldırım in Kuledibi wurden ebenfalls Pera) genannt.
    [Show full text]
  • DK Eyewitness Travel Guide: Istanbul
    174 ISTANBUL AREA BY AREA A 90-Minute Walk from Taksim Square to the Istanbul Modern Art Museum It was in the Pera district that Constantinople’s cosmopolitan population lived and worked in the 19th century, where the embassies and palatial residences mirrored the lifestyle of Topkapı Palace, on the opposite side of the Golden Horn. Once known as the “Paris of the East”, life centred on the main street of Pera, today’s İstiklâl Caddesi. Even today the Avrupa Pasajı and Balık Pazar markets seem wistfully unchanged, especially when contrasted with the remarkable Pera Museum A Çiçek Pasajı restaurant 4 and the sophisticated Istanbul Modern Art Museum. you reach the exquisite market, Çiçek Pasajı 4, built Pera Museum 8 (once the by Italian architect Michel Bristol Hotel), where the Capello in 1856, and now philanthropic Koç family filled with restaurants. At Stop exhibits their art collection Restaurant, veer left then right and Turkish tiles. ę on Şahne Sokak, which forms % %&4 $" the backbone of the Fish 4",*;"ć"$*$"% * Market, or Balık Pazar 5. 5"3-"#"ł 40, Return along Sahne #" #":3". )"."-#"ł*$"%-*,40 501±&,&/-&3 Sokak and stroll down #Ã:Ã, $ 40,"ć* " &łę- . , : 4 the arcaded Hall of 0, /&7ę;"%& , Mirrors, or Avrupa "34-"/40, 40 Pasajı 6 on the right. ę 4 The Neo-Renaissance & % ±&ł.&4ę40, interior, with marble % #"ł"ć" " ę floors and classical $ &4 % % " statues, was once lit $ :&/ę±"3ł*$" by gas lamps and . " 5 6 % Avrupa Pasajı bazaar mirrors amplified : ,"--"7ę E " 5ę:& the light. 4 40,"ć* * ć & " 4, , ę±ę Along İstiklâl Caddesi Turn right , ±& ę40, 4 0 ,± & .&ł36 ę : '¶ )":3 Begin the walk in Taksim and then left & ę45ę,-"-$"%%&4ę 3 /à 1 3ę ć* K Square at the Independence onto Meşrutiyet ;ę:"40," % Monument, completed by Caddesi and % &4ę $"% Pietro Canonica in 1928, follow the road #045"/#"ł* that depicts Atatürk with around to the left ."$"% his political contemporaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Turkey | Freedom House Page 1 of 8
    Turkey | Freedom House Page 1 of 8 Turkey freedomhouse.org Turkey received a downward trend arrow due to more pronounced political interference in anticorruption mechanisms and judicial processes, and greater tensions between majority Sunni Muslims and minority Alevis. The ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP) secured two electoral victories in 2014. In March, it prevailed in local elections with more than 40 percent of the vote, and in August the party’s leader, Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, was elected president in the first direct elections for that post in Turkey’s history. The AKP won despite a corruption scandal implicating government ministers as well as Erdoğan and his family, which emerged in December 2013 and cast a shadow over Turkish politics throughout 2014. Erdoğan dismissed the evidence of corruption, including audio recordings, as fabrications by elements of a “parallel state” composed of followers of Fethullah Gülen, an Islamic scholar who had backed the AKP but was now accused of plotting to bring down the government. More than 45,000 police officers and 2,500 judges and prosecutors were reassigned to new jobs, a move the government said was necessary to punish and weaken rogue officials; critics claimed it was designed to stop anticorruption investigations and undermine judicial independence. Erdoğan and AKP officials spoke out against other so-called traitors, including critical journalists and business leaders as well as members of the Alevi religious minority. Media outlets bearing unfavorable coverage of the government have been closed or placed under investigation. In December, more than 30 people linked to Gülen, including newspaper editors and television scriptwriters, were arrested on charges of establishing a terrorist group; this sparked widespread protests.
    [Show full text]
  • Taksim Square As 'Heritage Site' and the 2013 Gezi Protests
    Whitehead C, Bozoğlu G. Protest, Bodies, and the Grounds of Memory: Taksim Square as 'heritage site' and the 2013 Gezi Protests. Heritage and Society (2017) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2159032X.2017.1301084 Copyright: This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Heritage and Society on 30/03/2017, available online: https://doi.org/10.1080/2159032X.2017.1301084 Date deposited: 11/04/2017 Embargo release date: 30 September 2018 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International licence Newcastle University ePrints - eprint.ncl.ac.uk This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis Group in Heritage and Society on 30/04/2017, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/2159032X.2017.1301084 Protest, Bodies and the Grounds of Memory: Taksim Square as ‘heritage site’ and the 2013 Gezi Protests Christopher Whitehead and Gönül Bozoğlu Media, Culture, Heritage, Newcastle University Place incarnates the experiences and aspirations of a people. Place is not only a fact to be explained in the broader frame of space, but it is also a reality to be clarified and understood from the perspectives of the people who have given it meaning. (Yi-Fu Tuan Space and Place, 1979: 387) The current protest movement isn’t about the past; it is about today and tomorrow. It started because a new generation wanted to defend Gezi Park, a public green space, against the violent, abusive manner in which the government sought to sacrifice it to the gods of neo-liberalism and neo- Ottomanism with a plan to build a replica of Ottoman barracks, a shopping mall and apartments (Edhem Eldem, ‘Turkey’s False Nostalgia’, New York Times, 2013).
    [Show full text]
  • Architectural and Historic Preservation of Old Houses Baltazzi's Old
    ARCHITECTURAL AND HISTORIC PRESERVATION OF OLD HOUSES BALTAZZI’S OLD PROPERTIES IN ISTANBUL Houses- Appartments - Mansions-Yalis - Hans and Farms Introduction I am happy to have concluded this research which I had in mind for a long time. I was of course encouraged by the positive trend of continuing group research on the history of Levantines. This work is also aimed as a message to encourage the preservation of the architectural and historical heritage of the city of Istanbul and I am grateful for the help from friends and the efficient assistance of my offices in both cities. The Baltazzi famiy, although since the XVIIIth century were living in Izmir have also maintained close relations from that time with the capital Istanbul due to their business activites in finance and banking as well as due their close relations with the Ottoman Court. Some other Levantive and Greek families such as the Whittals, the La Fontaines, the Mavrogordato, the Sevastopoulos to cite a few also acquired a range of proprieties and hade members of these numerous families resident in both cities and various neighbourhoods. 1- HOUSES The emminent authority on Ottoman Banking History Pr. Haydar Kazgan and many other authors mention that the first permission to a foreigner to own a house was given in recognition of the services rendered to the Sultan to my great great grand father the Banker Emanuele Baltazzi around 1850 whereas the official permission for foreigners to own real-estate was granted only in 1867. Where was this house situated? Akylas Millas in his “Pera Crossroads of Constantinople” gives as location the Bonmarche at Istanbul Grand Rue de Pera (today Istiklal Caddesi of Beyoğlu) saying “The Bartoli brothers famous for Au Bon Marche department store occupied the ground floor of a neo-classical building erected in 1870 on the site of the residence of Manolaki Valtadji efendi which burnt in the frequent fires which occurred in Pera”.
    [Show full text]