Lord Steel 13 March 2019 122/16-24

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Lord Steel 13 March 2019 122/16-24 IICSA Inquiry-Westminster 13 March 2019 1 Wednesday, 13 March 2019 1 more active than that, so I saw everything only from my 2 (10.00 am) 2 local party perspective. I was an agent in the GLC 3 THE CHAIR: Good morning, everyone, and welcome to Day 8 of 3 elections in 1977 to my first husband, but apart from 4 this public hearing. Mr Henderson? 4 that and delivering leaflets, going on demonstrations, 5 MR HENDERSON: Chair, our first witness today is 5 I didn't do much else. 6 Baroness Brinton. 6 I became much more active -- 7 SARAH VIRGINIA BRINTON (BARONESS BRINTON) (sworn) 7 Q. Let me just pause you there. Thank you. Could I just 8 Examination by MR HENDERSON 8 ask you, thank you for all of that, but could you keep 9 MR HENDERSON: Good morning, Baroness Brinton. 9 everything a little bit slower? You will see the ladies 10 A. Good morning. 10 in front of you are taking a transcript and it helps if 11 Q. Hopefully, you should have in front of you a file of 11 we slow down. Thank you. 12 papers. We will bring relevant documents up on the 12 You said you were involved in local politics and you 13 screen just to your right as well. Can you tell us your 13 were involved in the Liberal Party before it then became 14 full name? 14 the Liberal Democrats in 1998 to 1992? 15 A. Sarah Virginia Brinton (Baroness Brinton). 15 A. Yes. 16 Q. Baroness Brinton, can you give us just a little bit of 16 Q. Just tell us a little bit about the roles that you 17 personal background: tell us briefly what you did before 17 played in the party? 18 you got involved in politics? 18 A. At that stage, very, very little, because of my job. 19 A. I trained as a stage manager and I worked at the BBC for 19 I mean, I was travelling all over the country, I was 20 some eight years and then went on to be a mature student 20 working in the studio long hours. So I would go to 21 at Cambridge, moved into business and then I was bursar 21 executive meetings of my local party. I had no contact 22 of two Cambridge colleges for over a decade and then 22 at all either with the London party, which was what we 23 continued in education thereafter. I joined the 23 would now call the region, and certainly not with HQ. 24 Liberals in 1974, after the elections. Because of my 24 But my first husband was more active. He was approved 25 job at the BBC, which was in production, I couldn't be 25 as a candidate, and he certainly stood, as I say, for Page 1 Page 2 1 the GLC elections. 1 discipline or safeguarding, child protection policies, 2 Q. So it was London that was your main focus at that point? 2 any of that kind of thing? 3 A. London was my base, yes. 3 A. I have no formal role, as the leader doesn't either, in 4 Q. You are currently president of the Liberal Democrats. 4 discipline, and that's never been the case. Currently, 5 When did you start that role? 5 we are in the middle of changing our processes. Over 6 A. I started that in January 2015, the campaign was for 6 the last five to six years, we have recognised that 7 2014. By that stage, I had ceased to be a councillor, 7 having discipline processes either run by local parties 8 which I'm happy to go back over, if that is helpful. 8 or at state levels where elected members, elected onto 9 But in my role as president, I chair the party's federal 9 committees, may have some role in discipline has not 10 board and I am voted for by all the members, so it's 10 been good, and as a result of that, we have now -- 11 like the leadership of our party. It's a full campaign 11 through the membership, agreeing it at conference -- 12 and I represent them. I'm now in my second and final 12 moved to a new system of an independent parallel 13 term of office, due to end at the end of this calendar 13 structure headed up by members of the party who are 14 year. 14 lawyers but who are not allowed to be elected in any 15 Q. What are your responsibilities as president? 15 other role in the party. That's just about to start 16 A. Well, apart from the practical ones of chairing the 16 happening. 17 board, I would describe myself as holding the ring on 17 Q. Thank you. We will come back to that at the end of your 18 everything to do with the federal party. The party, the 18 evidence, if I may. 19 Liberal Democrats as well as the Liberals, are very 19 But can I firstly, and for the bulk of your evidence 20 devolved and the members and the local parties would 20 we are going to look at some things that happened in the 21 certainly regard as giving the power upwards both to the 21 past? 22 state parties and the state parties -- England, Scotland 22 A. Yes. 23 and Wales -- are the federation, and the president must 23 Q. You have kindly provided two witness statements to this 24 come from one of those three state parties. 24 inquiry, and I would like to bring up the first of them 25 Q. Do you have responsibilities for matters such as 25 now, please -- there's LDP000018. Chair, I would invite Page 3 Page 4 1 (Pages 1 to 4) Epiq Europe Ltd www.epiqglobal.com Lower Ground, 20 Furnival Street (+44)207 4041400 [email protected] London EC4A 1JS IICSA Inquiry-Westminster 13 March 2019 1 you to adduce this statement in its entirety. 1 I also asked Lord Newby to assist, because he had 2 Baroness Brinton, in this statement, you have dealt 2 been general secretary of the SDP prior to the merger, 3 with a number of subjects that the inquiry has asked for 3 and very involved in the party from the merger days, '88 4 a senior member of the Liberal Democrats to address. 4 on, and had been in the House of Lords for most of that 5 I am going to take you through them in stages. 5 time as well, and indeed had been Chief Whip in the 6 Firstly, if we look at the start of the statement, 6 House of Lords. 7 paragraph 1.6 on page 2, you have explained that you 7 Q. Thank you. Am I right to understand, then, that the 8 didn't compile this statement alone? 8 statement you have provided is a joint effort drawing on 9 A. No. 9 not just the corporate record, but also the memory of 10 Q. You had a small working party to do. Can you just 10 those individuals you have named? 11 explain for us how you went about producing the 11 A. Yes. 12 statement? 12 Q. I understand as well that you actually spoke to a number 13 A. For something serious like this, the obvious people to 13 of other people? 14 speak to would be, first of all, those who are senior 14 A. Yes. 15 officers of the party, so the chief executive would be 15 Q. If we turn to LDP000010 at tab 4, on the second page 16 the person I would want to automatically include, 16 there, we have a list of other people that you spoke 17 because he obviously has access to records of anything 17 with. If we look down the list, we will see the thing 18 that happened via the staff at HQ. But I would also 18 in common seems to be a lot of them were around at the 19 turn to our senior people in parliament, those who have 19 relevant time; is that right? 20 been, or currently are, Chief Whips or leaders in either 20 A. That's right, yes. 21 the House of Commons or the House of Lords. 21 Q. When I say "the relevant time", I mean, in particular, 22 So Sir Nick Harvey, as our current chief executive, 22 the 1970s and '80s? 23 was also an MP for some years, and certainly -- although 23 A. Correct. Because, sadly, obviously, a lot of the key 24 I don't think that he overlapped with Cyril Smith, he 24 people are no longer with us. 25 certainly was around with a lot of the MPs who did. 25 Q. If we can go back to your main statement, please, and if Page 5 Page 6 1 we can go on to paragraph 3, which is on page 3, I would 1 that and bringing it up to date in the 20th century. 2 like to ask you, Baroness Brinton, firstly about the 2 Q. You describe here, just at the end of that paragraph: 3 historic structure and the procedures of the Liberal 3 "In the mid 1960s, the party commissioned 4 Party. There are three broad periods I would like to 4 a constitutional review to bring the constitution up to 5 ask you about.
Recommended publications
  • 100 Interview David Steel
    A Very English Scandal from his creditors and was no longer and decided to take the motion head- person, however miserable and threat- available for Thorpe at a moment’s on and that, if carried, we would all ening the man in question had made notice and he realised that Thorpe was resign on the spot. The motion was his life over many years? The answer prepared to throw him to the media taken at a private session of the Assem- is that it was possible. No one, how- wolves. It happened similarly later bly and Gruff Evans was ruthless in ever apparently stable and sensible, on in the case when David Holmes, his detailing of the difficulties we had is immune from becoming mentally Thorpe’s previously close friend, real- faced over many years, which were unbalanced by the pressure of domes- ised that he was being made to take a revelation to delegates. Dr Walsh’s tic circumstances, and there is no the whole blame for what Thorpe saw motion was duly withdrawn. doubt that it is conceivable that even- as the incompetence of the execution Two questions remain. First, was tually Jeremy Thorpe could arrive at a of the whole plot to silence Scott. It not Thorpe as leader responsible for the point where he demanded, ‘Who will even extended to the wholly innocent huge rise in Liberal support at the Feb- rid me of this turbulent Scott?’ As for friend, Nadir Dinshaw, who finally ruary 1974 election? Not really. With evidence, after the trial, and after the demurred at being the conduit for his 1970 majority having dropped to death of David Holmes, Andrew New- diverting cash from Jack Hayward, just 369 votes, he was instructed firmly ton publicised recordings he had made and was then threatened by Thorpe that he was not to set foot outside his of telephone conversations he had con- who said that ‘he would be asked to constituency and he undertook no ducted with Holmes which essentially move on’, i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Images Within This Issue Are of a Violent Nature, but We Cannot Hide from Them
    2017 no. 1 £6.00 (free to members) Images within this issue are of a violent nature, but we cannot hide from them. Individual tragedies such as these . are what refugees and economic migrants are fleeing, they are part of the legacy of imperialism as much as problems in countries like Nigeria (or any other conflict area). EVENTS CONTENTS 30th January 2017 Isaiah Berlin Lecture. 1.00pm Nigeria and the legacy of military rule. Chatham House by Rebecca Tinsley Pages 3-5 9th February 2017 Chinese New Year Dinner and Auction. Guest Speaker: Prof Kerry Brown. £45. Indonesia, the sleeping giant awakes. 7.00pm NLC. RSVP [email protected] by Howard Henshaw Pages 7-8 18-19th February 2017 Cymdeithas Lloyd George – Lloyd George Society Weekend School. Hotel Com- Some culture and politics of Georgia. modore, Llandrindod Wells. by Kiron Reid Pages 9-11 https://lloydgeorgesociety.org.uk 20th February 2017 LIBG Forum on French elec- International Abstracts Pages 12-13 tions, co-hosted with MoDem. NLC European Parliament Brexit Chief to deliver 4th March 2017 Rights Liberty Justice Pop-Up Con- 2017 Isaiah Berlin Lecture in London Page 13 ference – The Supreme Court Article 50 decision & beyond. Bermondsey Village Hall, near London Reviews Pages 14-16 Bridge Station 6th March 2017 LIBG Executive, NLC 13th March 2017 LIBG Forum on the South China Photographs: Anon, Howard Henshaw, Kiron Reid. Sea. NLC 17th-19th March 2017 Liberal Democrat Spring Con- ference, York. 25th March 2017 Unite For Europe National March to Parliament. 11.00am London 15th May 2017 LIBG Forum on East Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • Liberalism in Germany and the Netherlands
    REVIEWS Mr Ian Hunter of his edition companion volume to the liberalism. It was heavily associ- of the correspondence which present tome. ated with the 1848 revolutions passed between Churchill and and things went downhill from Lloyd George, more than 1,000 Dr J. Graham Jones is Senior there on. Despite being the communications in all, dat- Archivist and Head of the Welsh main voice for German unifica- ing from 1904 to 1945. It will Political Archive at the National tion, its regionalism stifled its undoubtedly be an admirable Library of Wales, Aberystwyth. development – always looking towards the state instead of the people, whom it might be said to fear. Not only the National- liberale Partei (National Liberal Liberalism in Germany and the Netherlands Party) on the right but also the Deutsche Volkspartei and Patrick van Schie and Gerrit Voerman (eds.) The Dividing Fortschrittliche Volkspartei Line between Success and Failure (Lit Verlag, 2006) (Progressive People’s Party) on the left (in particular) had a Reviewed by Saeed Rahman chequered history under Bis- marck and the Kaiser; while they had some successes, they y first encounter with one tends to see a synergy were increasingly marginalised continental liberal- between the Dutch Volkspartij on the national stage. However, Mism was a happy one, voor Vrijheid en Democratie the Kulturkampf was as much some time in the mid 1970s. – VVD (People’s Party for Free- their policy as Bismarck’s, Steve Atack, then Chair of the dom and Democracy) and the reflecting the anti-clericalism National League of Young Lib- German Freie Demokratische that characterises much conti- erals, brought a delegation from Partei – FDP (Free Democratic nental liberalism (and the fact the Youth Wing of D66 down Party) on the right or economic that Roman Catholicism was to Maldon to meet a Young Lib- wing.
    [Show full text]
  • 97 Winter 2017–18 3 Liberal History News Winter 2017–18
    For the study of Liberal, SDP and Issue 97 / Winter 2017–18 / £7.50 Liberal Democrat history Journal of LiberalHI ST O R Y The Forbidden Ground Tony Little Gladstone and the Contagious Diseases Acts J. Graham Jones Lord Geraint of Ponterwyd Biography of Geraint Howells Susanne Stoddart Domesticity and the New Liberalism in the Edwardian press Douglas Oliver Liberals in local government 1967–2017 Meeting report Alistair J. Reid; Tudor Jones Liberalism Reviews of books by Michael Freeden amd Edward Fawcett Liberal Democrat History Group “David Laws has written what deserves to become the definitive account of the 2010–15 coalition government. It is also a cracking good read: fast-paced, insightful and a must for all those interested in British politics.” PADDY ASHDOWN COALITION DIARIES 2012–2015 BY DAVID LAWS Frank, acerbic, sometimes shocking and often funny, Coalition Diaries chronicles the historic Liberal Democrat–Conservative coalition government through the eyes of someone at the heart of the action. It offers extraordinary pen portraits of all the personalities involved, and candid insider insight into one of the most fascinating periods of recent British political history. 560pp hardback, £25 To buy Coalition Diaries from our website at the special price of £20, please enter promo code “JLH2” www.bitebackpublishing.com Journal of Liberal History advert.indd 1 16/11/2017 12:31 Journal of Liberal History Issue 97: Winter 2017–18 The Journal of Liberal History is published quarterly by the Liberal Democrat History Group. ISSN 1479-9642 Liberal history news 4 Editor: Duncan Brack Obituary of Bill Pitt; events at Gladstone’s Library Deputy Editors: Mia Hadfield-Spoor, Tom Kiehl Assistant Editor: Siobhan Vitelli Archive Sources Editor: Dr J.
    [Show full text]
  • Tony Greaves
    TONY GREAVES An Appreciation Liberal History Group by Michael Meadowcroft Tony Greaves never seemed to age. He had a firm belief that politics was capable of transforming society, and his consistent advocacy of local campaigning, community politics and the necessity for both to be anchored in a radical Liberalism had hardly changed from his Young Liberal days. His election to the Lancashire County Council, in 1973, disqualified him legally from his job teaching geography and from then on to his sudden death almost fifty years later he became one of that committed band of Liberals who put the cause before comfort and struggled to find a succession of jobs that would enable him to keep politics as his first priority. His life before politics captured him was that of a scholarship boy separated from his background by intelligence and an ability to pass exams. Born in Bradford into a family with no direct political involvement, he passed the extremely competitive examination for the direct-grant Bradford Grammar School, but an employment move by his police driving- instructor father took him instead to Queen Elizabeth Grammar School in Wakefield. His successes at ‘O’, ‘A’ and ‘S’ levels enabled him to go to Hertford College, Oxford, and to gain a BA in geography. He followed this with a Diploma in Economic Development at Manchester University. By this time, he had discovered a passion for politics and particularly for political debate. By personality – and influenced by the non-statist radicalism of the then party leader, Jo Grimond – Greaves naturally gravitated to the Liberal cause.
    [Show full text]
  • 'The Left's Views on Israel: from the Establishment of the Jewish State To
    ‘The Left’s Views on Israel: From the establishment of the Jewish state to the intifada’ Thesis submitted by June Edmunds for PhD examination at the London School of Economics and Political Science 1 UMI Number: U615796 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U615796 Published by ProQuest LLC 2014. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 F 7377 POLITI 58^S8i ABSTRACT The British left has confronted a dilemma in forming its attitude towards Israel in the postwar period. The establishment of the Jewish state seemed to force people on the left to choose between competing nationalisms - Israeli, Arab and later, Palestinian. Over time, a number of key developments sharpened the dilemma. My central focus is the evolution of thinking about Israel and the Middle East in the British Labour Party. I examine four critical periods: the creation of Israel in 1948; the Suez war in 1956; the Arab-Israeli war of 1967 and the 1980s, covering mainly the Israeli invasion of Lebanon but also the intifada. In each case, entrenched attitudes were called into question and longer-term shifts were triggered in the aftermath.
    [Show full text]
  • Eduard L. Danielyan Progressive British Figures' Appreciation of Armenia's Civilizational Significance Versus the Falsified
    INSTITUTE OF HISTORY OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA EDUARD L. DANIELYAN PROGRESSIVE BRITISH FIGURES’ APPRECIATION OF ARMENIA’S CIVILIZATIONAL SIGNIFICANCE VERSUS THE FALSIFIED “ANCIENT TURKEY” EXHIBIT IN THE BRITISH MUSEUM YEREVAN 2013 1 PUBLISHED WITH THE APPROVAL OF THE SCIENTIFIC COUNCIL OF THE INSTITUTE OF HISTORY OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA This work was supported by State Committee of Science MES RA, in frame of the research project № 11-6a634 “Falsification of basic questions of the history of Armenia in the Turkish-Azerbaijani historiogrpahy”. Reviewer A.A.Melkonyan, Doctor of History, corresponding member of the NAS RA Edited by Dr. John W. Mason, Pauline H. Mason, M.A. Eduard L. Danielyan Progressive British Figures’ Appreciation of Armenia’s Civilizational Significance Versus the Falsified “Ancient Turkey” Exhibit in the British Museum This work presents a cultural-spiritual perception of Armenia by famous British people as the country of Paradise, Noah’s Ark on Mt. Ararat-Masis and the cradle of civilization. Special attention is paid in the book to the fact that modern British enlightened figures call the UK government to recognize the Armenian Genocide, but this question has been politicized and subjected to the interests of UK-Turkey relations, thus being pushed into the genocide denial deadlock. The fact of sheltering and showing the Turkish falsified “interpretations” of the archaeological artifacts from ancient sites of the Armenian Highland and Asia Minor in the British Museum’s “Room 54” exhibit wrongly entitled “Ancient Turkey” is an example of how the genocide denial policy of Turkey pollutes the Britain’s historical-cultural treasury and distorts rational minds and inquisitiveness of many visitors from different countries of the world.The author shows that Turkish falsifications of history have been widely criticized in historiography.
    [Show full text]
  • For Our Time EUROPE 8I Moresignsthat Britain Is Makingthe Grade in Eurcpe
    August/September 1981 Picasso and Turner - European painters for our time EUROPE 8I Moresignsthat Britain is makingthe grade in Eurcpe Our breakdown of the performance of British industry i.n Europe Published by the Commission of the (page I5),based on the latest figures, confirms that the United. European Communities, 20 Kensington Kingdom's trade with the rest of tlr.e Community continues to Palace Gardens, London tI78 4QQ. Tel: 0l-727 8090 increase, despite a falling-off in such traditional industries as iron and steel andmotor car manufacture.Areport onthe cross-Channel Editor-in-Chief: George Scott ferries, on the Business Page, tells a similar story. Editor: JohnGreenwood Associate Editor: Denis Thomas Desigl : Lawrence Edwards Our second rep ort ( opposite ) on how European fund.s are being mad.e available to help in the recovery of IAIales, covers both southern and Printed by Lawrence-Allen Ltd, lU7eston-super-Mare, Avon northern parts of the Principality. In both regions ttre prospects 1ook Europe 8l does not necessarily reflect, goodfor tourism - now accepted throughout Europe as a key area for in all economic growbh. particulars, the opinions of the Community institutions. Unsigned material may be quoted or reprinted without payment, We also report on two Britlsh families who are making new lives for subiect to suitable acknowledgement. themselves in France (page g), and on the situation in Tanzania, where European aid, under the terms of Lome Belfust Offce : W'ndsor House, the agreements, is 9/15 Bedford Street, Belfast BT2 7EG being put to urgent use (page 7). Tel. (0232) 40708 C ardiff Offi ce : 4 Cathedral Road, CardiffCFl 9SG Anyone who is con-firsed by stories of how EEC regulations are Tel.
    [Show full text]
  • Professor Lord David Alton of Liverpool: a Statement of Gratitude and Appreciation
    Professor Lord David Alton of Liverpool: A statement of gratitude and appreciation People suffering oppression across the world, often silenced and ignored, have a real friend in Lord Alton. A member of the House of Lords in the British Parliament, Lord Alton is probably the most hard-working campaigner for human rights and fighting for all those who are discriminated against, disenfranchised, abused and even killed. Lord Alton recently won what must be the highest accolade – being sanctioned by the Chinese government for his continued protests about their notorious policies towards the Uighur Muslims. In typical fashion, Lord Alton (together with the other politicians who were similarly sanctioned) promised to “redouble” his efforts to fight for the Uighur. He is renowned for his work on rights in Tibet, Myanmar and Rwanda, for which he was honoured by the Catholic Church. Lord Alton has been equally indefatigable in his pursuit of rights in the Horn of Africa. He was one of the first Parliamentarians to visit Sudan’s Darfur genocide in the early 2000s and been a voice for Sudanese in Parliament in the decades since. He has taken up the oppression of Eritreans, the war in Tigray and rights of Ethiopians, with a tenacity and energy that is hard to believe. Lord Alton is the Vice-Chair of the APPG for Eritrea and has served in that role for several years raising awareness of the gross human rights abuses perpetrated by the Eritrean Government on its own people. David has taken a very active interest in Eritrea and its people – inside and outside of Parliament.
    [Show full text]
  • Policy and Ideology
    reviews salutary to note that three Labour polls twice in a short space of time. governments have effectively been A second election in 1910 failed to destroyed by slavishly follow- improve the Asquith government’s ing American priorities: those of position. In 1951 Attlee risked his Attlee, Blair and Wilson. The latter small 1950 majority at a second bought American backing for the election and lost it. After the first currency after 1964 with a view election of 1974 Wilson’s minority to avoiding devaluation, thereby government successfully managed upsetting his entire economic to lead the country out of the chaos strategy; Wilson antagonised his of the miners’ strike, the three-day domestic support by backing the week and raging inflation, though war in Vietnam but irritated the it suffered fifty-nine parliamentary Americans by resisting pressure to defeats in 1974–76. Encouraged by send troops to fight there. Morgan the pollsters, Wilson opted for the shows that even in the 1960s Ameri- expected autumn election – and can politicians had little genuine failed to win the expected working regard for Britain despite extrava- majority. Would a minority Tory gant public displays of mutual government, handicapped by eco- admiration. nomic austerity and internal divi- Finally, Morgan offers a per- sions in 2010–11, really have been suasive revisionist view of the in a position to risk a second elec- Wilson-Callaghan governments tion? On the contrary, the ensuing of 1974–79 which, indirectly, post-election interval would have gives food for thought for Liberal allowed Lib Dems to maintain their Democrats.
    [Show full text]
  • British Academy Review • 17
    British Academy Review • 17 A MEDIEVAL MÊLÉE BRITISH ACADEMY British Academy Review Issue 17 March 2011 THE BRITISH ACADEMY 10–11 Carlton House Terrace, London SW1Y 5AH Telephone: 020 7969 5200 Fax: 020 7969 5300 Web site: www.britac.ac.uk © The British Academy 2011 The British Academy Review contains articles illustrating the wide range of scholarship which the British Academy promotes in its role as the UKs national academy for the humanities and social sciences. Views of named writers are the views exclusively of those writers; publication does not constitute endorsement by the British Academy. Suggestions for articles by current and former British Academy grant- and post-holders, as well as by Fellows of the British Academy, are very welcome. Suggestions may be sent to the Editor, James Rivington, at [email protected] Page make-up by Don Friston Printed in Great Britain on recycled paper by Henry Ling Limited at the Dorset Press Dorchester, Dorset Cover image: from the Jami al-Tawarikh manuscript, Edinburgh University Library iii Contents The coalition starts its white-knuckle ride 1 Martin Kettle The recession and stress at work 4 Professor Tarani Chandola Britain, Germany and Social Europe, 1973-2020 5 Sir Tony Atkinson FBA Social mobility: drivers and policy responses revisited 8 Professor Anthony Heath FBA and Dr Anna Zimdars Conflict resolution and reconciliation: An Irish perspective 11 Dáithí O’Ceallaigh British Academy President’s Medal 13 Medieval scenes Personifications of Old Age in medieval poetry: Charles d’Orléans 15 Professor Ad Putter The medieval Welsh poetry associated with Owain Glyndwˆr 18 Professor Gruffydd Aled Williams Forging the Anglo-Saxon past: Beverley Minster in the 14th century 23 Dr David Woodman The acts of medieval English bishops, illustrated 25 Dr Martin Brett Propaganda in the Mongol ‘World History’ 29 Professor Robert Hillenbrand FBA Portable Christianity: Relics in the Medieval West (c.700-1200) 39 Professor Julia Smith The stone sculptures of Anglo-Saxon England 41 Professor Rosemary Cramp FBA and Professor Richard N.
    [Show full text]
  • Rake and Rumpole – Mavericks for Justice: Purity and Impurity in Legal Professionalism
    Rake and Rumpole – mavericks for justice: Purity and impurity in legal professionalism Author Flood, John Published 2020 Book Title Law, Lawyers and Justice: Through Australian Lenses Version Submitted Manuscript (SM) DOI https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429288128-11 Copyright Statement © 2020 Taylor & Francis. This is an Accepted Manuscript of a book chapter published by Routledge in Law, Lawyers and Justice: Through Australian Lenses on 1 April 2020, available online: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429288128-11 Downloaded from http://hdl.handle.net/10072/399605 Griffith Research Online https://research-repository.griffith.edu.au Rake and Rumpole: Mavericks for Justice—Purity and Impurity in Legal Professionalism John Flood Abstract TV shows and films about law and lawyers are hugely successful. During its heyday in the late 20th century Rumpole of the Bailey drew 10 million viewers and was watched worldwide. Law programs are often the only source of knowledge about law for many people. The shows play on the themes of right and wrong, justice and injustice, usually through the medium of the adversarial court process. The two shows compared here, Rake and Rumpole, are emblematic of the legal themes emerging in popular legal culture. I have borrowed from Mary Douglas’ Purity and Danger the idea that symbolic and professional culture of the Bar is diverse. Both Cleaver Greene and Horace Rumpole in their lives and professional practices express this diversity. Rumpole represents an essentially Whiggish ideal of the Bar and English society while Greene rampages through a Benthamite Australian ideal rejecting authority. The chapter also includes reflections on professionalism and women in law.
    [Show full text]