1. Kenkenrokuis a Diplomatic Memoir, Originally Written in Japanese by The

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

1. Kenkenrokuis a Diplomatic Memoir, Originally Written in Japanese by The © The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved Kenkenroku: A Diplomatic Record of the Sino-Japanese War, 1894–1895. By Mutsu Munemitsu. Edited and translated by Gordon Mark Berger. Princeton University Press, 1983, 318 pp., $27.50. 1. Kenkenroku is a diplomatic memoir, originally written in Japanese bythe foreign minister of Japan, Mutsu Munemitsu, and covering events during and immediately after the First Sino-Japanese War. Based on a large amount of state papers and diplomatic correspond- Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/chinesejil/article/14/1/229/423247 by guest on 29 September 2021 ence, Mutsu recounted the history of the war, including the Tonghak Rebellion, Korean domestic reform, the outbreak of Sino-Japanese hostilities, battles during the war, the peace negotiations, and the Triple Intervention. As the foreign minister and then the chief negotiator at the Shimonoseki talks, Mutsu had a comprehensive, firsthand grasp of this war, especially how Japan made its military and foreign-policy decisions. Since very few scholars writing in Western languages had analyzed this critical East Asian conflict, the Japan Foundation invited Professor Gordon Berger to translate Mutsu’s work into English. Besides editing and translating the book, Bergeralso added historical notes offering more background information and checked facts against the original diplomatic dispatches. Readers can easily refer to the original materials that Mutsu used in assembling his memoir by means of the citations throughout the text. 2. The First Sino-Japanese War was a seminal event that changed the nature of inter- national relations in East Asia and had global repercussions. Accordingly, the importance of this book for researchers in modern Asian history or international relations has long been recognized. However, fewer people have perceived its relevance to international legal studies, especially the study of public international law during the late 19th century. Historian Douglas Howland did cite Kenkenroku in describing Japan’s dual strat- egy of international law and diplomacy during the First Sino-Japanese War, but few others have read Kenkenroku as a resource on international law. The main reason is that archival research is not a common methodology for international legal studies. International lawyers generally rely on secondary materials and public state papers as sources; however, those secondary materials are far from sufficient in this case, because in order to understand the nature of public international law in the late 19th century, three aspects should be observed and analyzed: states’ public arguments or justifications under international law, states’ actual practices, and states’ own attitudes astowhether theiractions could be justified on moral and legal grounds or solely by political expediency. Compared with normal dip- lomatic papers and secondary materials, which offer information only in the first two areas, Kenkenroku illustrates the real intentions underlying Japan’s statements by revealing its leaders’ internal discussions and providing Mutsu’s own analysis. In addition, as Berger explains in the introduction, this book responded to argumentsthat the Triple Intervention showed Japanese foreign policy to be a failure by arguing that the Japanese Cabinet had acted wisely and in Japan’s best interests in starting the war, in concluding it, and in accept- ing the humiliating advice of the Western powers. In the service of this purpose, Kenkenroku is remarkably frank in recounting Japan’s internal decision-making processes. One piece of evidence of his frankness is the work’s publication history: Kenkenroku was barred from publication until 1929. 3. Kenkenroku clearly distinguishes between the public justifications that Japan gave for its actions and the country’s real intentions, thereby illustrating the difference between pre- texts and justifying reasons under international law. For example, when talking about the cause of thewar, Mutsu said that “it was asserted that wewere fighting for the cause of justice and humanity, aiding the weak and checking the powerful; […] in my view, the reforms in Korea should focus primarily on Japan’s national interests. […] I never felt that Korea’s ................................................................................................................................................................... 14 Chinese Journal of International Law (2015), 229–236 230 Chinese JIL (2015) internal reform was very important in itself” (p.29). Statements like these help readers to understand how countries in the late 19th century appealed to public international law to decorate and conceal their actual intentions. 4. Fromthe perspective ofinternational law, eventhough the First Sino-Japanese Wargave Japan a ticket to enter the “civilized” world by adopting a European understanding of inter- national law, Japan was still hugely humiliated by the Triple Intervention. In addition to doc- umenting in detail the whole process of the conflict between China and Japan, Mutsu spent Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/chinesejil/article/14/1/229/423247 by guest on 29 September 2021 three chapters focusing on the Triple Intervention to show how difficult was his final decision to give up the gains he had negotiated from China. When confronted by the far stronger Triple Powers, Mutsu hopelessly admitted that diplomacy shorn of military support could not succeed (p.250). This diplomatic defeat at the hands of the Triple Intervention con- firmed that, in reality, only force mattered in international relations. Mutsu’s recounting of Japan’s interactions with China and with Western countries demonstrates how public international law in the late 19th century was manipulated in order to serve power politics, and how stronger, colonizing powers deployed it as an instrument to justify their actions. 5. Last but not least, Kenkenroku helps us understand the collision between Western and Eastern international systems and Eastern countries’ perceptions with regard to applying Western international law. The conflict between Japan and China led to the Qing dynasty’s loss of Korea, signifying the final collapse of the traditional Chinese tributary system. Superficially, this was a war between two countries, but essentially, according to Mutsu, it marked a collision between the new civilization of the West and the old civilization of East Asia. In his eyes, China, a stubborn, conservative, and ignorant country, stuck to its old culture and system while Japan joined Western civilization (p.28). This raises a ques- tion: did Japan thoroughly accept the Western understanding of public international law, or did it simply play the Western game for practical purposes? Kenkenroku offers insights that explore Japan’s and even China’s attitude toward Western public international law. From the author’s point of view, both Japan and China regarded Western public inter- national law as having no cultural or ethical superiority in itself, but merely as resting upon a balance of power; thus both countries applied Western international law when it was pol- itically convenient for them to do so. 6. Even though Mutsu was relatively candid in revealing some internal discussions, this book must still be read critically. First, the author tried to conceal or at least play down Japan’s real intentions in waging this war. Mutsu mentioned Japan’s “initial objectives” and “long-term goals” several times in the first half of this book, but he never specified what these goals were; on the contrary, the only reason that he gave for going to war with China was to protect Korea’s independence. Only when the reader nears the end of the book and carefully examines the discussions and considerations surrounding the terms that Japan proposed for the peace treaty does it become apparent that Japan’s ultimate goal was to establish dominance in East Asia. Second, this book ignores some historical events such as the Port Arthur Massacre, showing that it is far from complete or impartial in perspective. Nevertheless, these flaws do not greatly lessen the enduring value of this primary source, not only for historians but also for students and scholars of international law, who have tended to overlook its significance. Bijun Xu The Faculty of Law, The University of Hong Kong [email protected] Advance Access publication 20 February 2015 doi:10.1093/chinesejil/jmv002.
Recommended publications
  • Imperial Japanese Propaganda and the Founding of the Japan Times 1897-1904
    Volume 19 | Issue 12 | Number 2 | Article ID 5604 | Jun 15, 2021 The Asia-Pacific Journal | Japan Focus Imperial Japanese Propaganda and the Founding of The Japan Times 1897-1904 Alexander Rotard Abstract: Founded in 1897 as a semi-official government organ by Zumoto Motosada with the support of Itō Hirobumi and Fukuzawa Yukichi, The Japan Times played an essential role, as the first English-language newspaper to be edited by Japanese, in shaping Western understandings of Japan and Japanese modernisation in the late 19th to early 20th centuries. The Japan Times framed Japanese ‘modernisation’ in the language of Western civilisation, thus facilitating Japan’s rapprochement with the Western Powers (particularly with Great Britain) in the late 19th century by presenting Japan as a ‘civilised’ (i.e., Western) nation-state. The paper played an equally important role in manipulating Western public discourses in favour of Japan’s expansionist ambitions in Asia by framing justifications for Japanese foreign policy in concepts of Western civilisation. Keywords: Meiji-era Japanese propaganda, Zumoto Motosada, founder of The Japan Times1 The Japan Times, Zumoto Motosada, Japanese Imperialism, Anglo-Japanese rapprochement, colonisation of Korea. Introduction . Despite The Japan Times’ critical role as a Japanese Government propaganda organ, the paper has been greatly understudied in both the Japanese and English literature. Japanese- language studies of The Japan Times and Zumoto Motosada exist in small number2 but thorough research into The Japan Times’ role as a promoter of Meiji Government propaganda 1 19 | 12 | 2 APJ | JF has yet to be undertaken in English orthe Korean press has been well examined by Japanese.
    [Show full text]
  • Agony of Choice: Matsuoka Yosuke and the Rise and Fall of the Japanese Empire, 1880-1946 (Review)
    Agony of Choice: Matsuoka Yosuke and the Rise and Fall of the Japanese Empire, 1880-1946 (review) Frederick R. Dickinson The Journal of Japanese Studies, Volume 30, Number 1, Winter 2004, pp. 167-171 (Review) Published by Society for Japanese Studies DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/jjs.2004.0003 For additional information about this article https://muse.jhu.edu/article/55092 [ This content has been declared free to read by the pubisher during the COVID-19 pandemic. ] 06-J2906-REV 1/9/04 6:28 AM Page 167 Review Section 167 Agony of Choice: Matsuoka Yo¯suke and the Rise and Fall of the Japanese Empire, 1880 –1946. By David J. Lu. Lexington Books, Lanham, Md., 2002. xvii, 309 pages. $75.00. Reviewed by Frederick R. Dickinson University of Pennsylvania History, Sir Walter Scott once noted, is peopled by living beings—“not ab- stractions... not diagrams and theorems; but men in buff coats and breeches, with color in their cheeks, with passions in their stomach and the idioms, features and vitalities of very men.” In this era of moral and analytic “complexity” and preference for the experience of a hitherto voiceless mul- titude, historians can rarely admit to an interest in “men in buff coats and breeches.” American Japan specialists have produced few biographies of Great Men in recent years. David Lu’s study follows the pattern of the most notable exceptions. Like Louis Perez, Herbert Bix, and Donald Keene,1 Lu belongs to an earlier generation of scholars who intuitively grasp the power of narrative history and the import of the lives of Great Men.
    [Show full text]
  • The Flexible Structure of Politics in Meiji Japan
    DLPPolicy and Practice for Developmental Leaders, Elites and Coalitions DEVELOPMENTAL LEADERSHIP PROGRAM Research Paper 07 The Flexible Structure of Politics in Meiji Japan Junji Banno, Professor Emeritus, The University of Tokyo and Kenichi Ohno, Professor Emeritus., The University of Tokyo April 2010 www.dlprog.org The Developmental Leadership Program (DLP) addresses an important gap in international thinking and policy about the critical role played by leaders, elites and coalitions in the politics of development. This growing program brings together business, academic and civil society partners from around the world to explore the role of human agency in the processes of development. DLP will address the policy, strategic, and operational implications about ‘thinking and working politically’ - for example, about how to help key players solve collective action problems, negotiate effective institutions and build stable states. The Developmental Leadership Program E: [email protected] W: www.dlprog.org 3 Abstract Japan’s transformation period following the encounter with the powerful West, in which the political regime was revised and new national goals and strategies were agreed, started with the signing of commercial treaties with the West in 1858 and ended with the settlement on the basic directions of political and economic reforms in 1881. In the intervening years, two goals of establishing a public delib- eration mechanism (kogi yoron) and raising economic and military capability (fukoku kyohei) were set, which later split into four policy groups of a constitution, a national assembly, industrialization, and foreign expedition. The simultaneous pursuit and eventual achievement of multiple goals was supported by the flexible structure of politics in which goals, alliances, and leaders and leading groups evolved dynamically without solidifying into a simple hard structure or falling into uncontrollable crisis.
    [Show full text]
  • Japan Looking at the World Looking at Japan : European Expansion Into
    Japan Looking at the World Looking at Japan European Expansion into East Asia, the Formation of the Japanese Concept and Perception of Colonial Rule as well as European Responses c. 19001 Harald Kleinschmidt, Tokyo An Interactionist Approach to the History of International Relations On 8 February 1868, the newly installed Meiji Government of Japan issued its proclamation nr 5. In this proclamation, it declared that it would honor the treaties that had been concluded between Japan and states in Europe and North America since 1854, but that it would also seek their revision in ac- cordance with ‘universal public law’ 宇内の公法 (udai no kōhō). On behalf of the government, Higashikuze Michitomi 東久世通禧, then in office as Director General Agency for Foreign Affairs 外国事務総督 (Gaikoku Jimu Sōtoku), communicated the contents of the proclamation to foreign diplo- matic envoys then accredited in Japan.2 The proclamation thus articulated the perception that there was a hierarchy of two legal frameworks that could be addressed for different, if not mutually exclusive purposes. Within this 1 Paper read to the Historical Institute of the University of Greifswald, 24 April 2017. 2 GENERAL AGENCY FOR FOREIGN AFFAIRS 外国事務総督 (Gaikoku Jimu Sōtoku): “Gaikō ni kan suru Fukokusho 外交に関スル布告書” (Government Proclamation Relating to Diplomacy [dated 8 February 1868 = 15th day of the first month of year Keio 4, concerning the treaties between Japan and other states, written by ŌKUBO Toshimichi 大 久保利道 and MUTSU Munemitsu 陸奥宗光]), Dai Nihon gaikō monjo 大日本外交文書 (Diplomatic Records of Japan), nr 97, vol. 1, Nihon Kokusai Kyōkai 日本国際協会 1938: 227–28. HIGASHIKUZE Michitomi: Nikki 日記 (Diary), vol.
    [Show full text]
  • KATO TAKAAKI, 1860-1926 a Remarkable Diplomat and Statesman [London, Minister ]895-1900; Ambassador 1908-12]
    8 KATO TAKAAKI, 1860-1926 A Remarkable Diplomat and Statesman [London, Minister ]895-1900; Ambassador 1908-12] IAN NISH Kato Takaaki ato Takaaki (1860-1926) had a remarkable record as diplomat and foreign K minister. He spent about a quarter of his career overseas and was foreign minister four times. He had th e good fortune to be able to combine diplomatic service abroad with high office in Tokyo. Since his only overseas postings were in Britain, he occupies a special place in the diplomacy of Anglo-Japanese relations. Among Japanese he was one of the greatest admirers of the institutions of Victorian-Edwardian Britain . Both in the Japanese Embassy in London and in Japan he achieved many of the goals he set for himself. But his temperament was brusque, puritanical, straight-talking and individualistic. Perhaps for that reason he is not generally given the credit for his achievements as one of Japan's greatest diplomats.1 Kato was born in Owari outside the area of the clans who had engineered the Meiji Restoration in 1868 and therefore without any special connections in government. In December 1882, after graduating from Tokyo Imperial University, which had just been established, he took up his first employment with Mitsubishi. He joined the sea transportation department, the main branch of the company at the time. After postings at Kobe, Osaka and Otaru, he was sent to London in April 1883 for study abroad (ryi1gaku) . He stayed at 33 Kings Road, Finsbury Park, north London.f But much of his time was spent in Liverpool, which had the reputation as the hub of global shipping at the time.
    [Show full text]
  • Japan Comes of Age: Mutsu Munemitsu and the Revision of the Unequal Treaties'
    H-US-Japan Henning on Perez, 'Japan Comes of Age: Mutsu Munemitsu and the Revision of the Unequal Treaties' Review published on Thursday, June 1, 2000 Louis G. Perez. Japan Comes of Age: Mutsu Munemitsu and the Revision of the Unequal Treaties. Madison, N.J.: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, 1999. 244 pp. $41.50 (cloth), ISBN 978-0-8386-3804-0. Reviewed by Joseph M. Henning (Department of History, Saint Vincent College) Published on H- US-Japan (June, 2000) Treaty Revision and the Razor Despite Mutsu Munemitsu's abilities, few enjoyed his company. Familiar to diplomatic historians as the foreign minister who revised Japan's unequal treaties with the Western powers in the 1890s, he was known to his contemporaries as "the Razor": an argumentative and "disagreeable misanthrope" (pp. 21, 32). Even as a young man, Mutsu began building a reputation for arrogance. Gunrunning for imperial loyalists in 1867, he and his sharp tongue nearly exhausted the patience of his colleagues. In the aftermath of a shipping accident, they momentarily considered killing Mutsu and chalking him up as the collision's victim; only at the last moment was his future brother-in-law able to dissuade them (p. 27). Making a hero out of the Razor is no easy feat. Louis G. Perez, however, succeeds and, in doing so, makes a worthwhile contribution to our understanding of Japanese diplomatic history. Synthesizing an extensive literature -- in both Japanese and English -- on Meiji diplomacy [1], Perez also provides an original and incisive analysis of Japan's quest for sovereign equality. In his first chapter, Perez describes Mutsu's life and career leading up to his appointment as foreign minister in 1892.
    [Show full text]
  • Rebellion and Defiance in the Japanese Army, 1860-1931
    Culture of Disobedience: Rebellion and Defiance in the Japanese Army, 1860-1931 The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Orbach, Dan. 2015. Culture of Disobedience: Rebellion and Defiance in the Japanese Army, 1860-1931. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, Graduate School of Arts & Sciences. Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:17467476 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA Culture of Disobedience: Rebellion and Defiance in the Japanese Army, 1860-1931 A dissertation presented by Dan Orbach to The History Department, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the subject of History Harvard University Cambridge, Massachusetts May 15th, 2015 © 2015 Dan Orbach All rights reserved Dissertation Advisor: Professor Andrew D. Gordon Dan Orbach Culture of Disobedience: Rebellion and Defiance in the Japanese Army, 1860-1931 Abstract Imperial Japanese soldiers were notorious for following their superiors to certain death. Their enemies in the Pacific War perceived their obedience as blind, and derided them as “cattle”. Yet the Japanese Army was arguably one of the most disobedient armies in the world. Officers repeatedly staged coups d’états, violent insurrections and political assassinations, while their associates defied orders given by both the government and high command, launched independent military operations against other countries, and in two notorious cases conspired to assassinate foreign leaders.
    [Show full text]
  • UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Aporia of Omotenashi
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Aporia of Omotenashi: Hospitality in Post-Oriental and Post-Imperial Japan A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Anthropology by Ryoko Nishijima 2017 © Copyright by Ryoko Nishijima 2017 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Aporia of Omotenashi: Hospitality in Post-Oriental and Post-Imperial Japan by Ryoko Nishijima Doctor of Philosophy in Anthropology University of California, Los Angeles, 2017 Professor Mariko Tamanoi, Chair The Japanese tourism industry, from its formation in the early 20th century to today, bears in many ways the postcolonial contradictions of Japan as a nation that has been at once the colonizer and the Orient. Engaging with the complex power dynamics inherent in the seemingly friendly gestures of “hospitality,” my dissertation analyzes the inconsistent ways in which the Japanese tourism industry has defined and dealt with foreign visitors, comparatively looking at tourists from the “West” and “Asia.” I divide the dissertation into four chapters: “Hospitality Infrastructure: Pursuing the Civilized,” which uncovers the mixed sentiment of national pride and shame behind the ardent discourse of hospitality in Japan, “Tourist Gaze: Searching for the Oriental,” in which I illustrate how Orientalist imaginings of Japan have continued to transform and endure in the tourist gazes today, “Roles of a Host: Performing the Hospitable,” which takes an ethnographic look at social relations between hosts and guests, and “Guests from Greater China: Welcoming the Ex-Colonized,” where I identify the legacy of Japan’s colonial history in the increasing number of visitors from the Greater China Region. KEYWORDS: Tourism, Japan, Postcolonialism, Techno-Orientalism, Hospitality ii The dissertation of Ryoko Nishijima is approved.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the Flexible Structure of Politics in Meiji Japan Junji Banno Professor
    The Flexible Structure of Politics in Meiji Japan ∗∗∗ Junji Banno Professor Emeritus, the University of Tokyo and Kenichi Ohno Professor, the National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies April 2010 Abstract Japan’s transformation period following the encounter with the powerful West, in which political regime was revised and new national goals and strategies were agreed, started with the signing of commercial treaties with the West in 1858 and ended with the settlement on the basic directions of political and economic reforms in 1881. In the intervening years, two goals of establishing a public deliberation mechanism ( kogi yoron ) and raising economic and military capability (fukoku kyohei ) were set, which later split into four policy groups of a constitution, a national assembly, industrialization, and foreign expedition. The simultaneous pursuit and eventual achievement of multiple goals was supported by the flexible structure of politics in which goals, alliances, and leaders and leading groups evolved dynamically without solidifying into a simple hard structure or falling into uncontrollable crisis. This mechanism, which was unique to Meiji Japan, is rarely seen in other countries or other times in Japanese history. It was also different from authoritarian developmental states of East Asia in the post WW2 period. Chronological details of this political process, initiated by the former warrior ( samurai ) class, are given and how political leaders emerged and contested among themselves is analyzed. ∗ This paper was prepared for the Leaders, Elites and Coalitions Research Programme (LECRP) organized by Prof. Adrian Leftwich of the University of York, UK, along with the authors’ parallel study on Meiji Restoration with extended chapters in the Japanese language.
    [Show full text]
  • The 3Rd Practical Tourism Study Tour Report Visit to Oiso in Conjunction with the “Tourism Strategy Project”, Which Learns T
    The 3rd Practical Tourism Study Tour Report Visit to Oiso In conjunction with the “Tourism Strategy Project”, which learns the big view and expertise in tourism from prominent lecturers, the Tokyo Metropolitan Public University Corporation occasionally conducts "Practical Tourism Study Tours" aimed at visiting and touring actual sightseeing spots. This year, which is the final year of the project, the influence of COVID-19 unprecedentedly blows the tourism industry which has been still in a tough situation. Under these circumstances, we will conduct three tours to explore the possibility of micro-tourism and technology, which are attracting attention as a new opportunity in the tourism industry. Micro-tourism was proposed early by Mr. Yoshiharu Hoshino, CEO of Hoshino Resorts, who will be invited as a lecturer at the 3rd Tourism Strategy Project and is attracting attention as a way of tourism that strike a balance between the prevention of infection and the local economy. The ideal way of tourism in COVID-19 period is that “tourism should not be the cause of pandemic”, and there has been a movement in various places to make local residents and neighbors enjoy areas where the risk of infection is low. On Thursday, December 10, 2020, we visited Oiso Town in Kanagawa Prefecture. Oiso Town faces the Pacific Ocean and has a temperate climate. During the Meiji era, the opening of Oiso Station coincided with the opening of the railroad, many famous people built villas and residences for the purpose of long-stay recreation and/or recuperation. In addition, since eight prime ministers have built villas and residences in this area, it has been called the "Inner Sanctum of Meiji political arena".
    [Show full text]
  • 7293 a Red and Black Lacquer Oi (Armour Box) Decorated with Gilt and Shakudō (Copper and Gold Alloy) Fittings
    7293 A red and black lacquer oi (armour box) decorated with gilt and shakudō (copper and gold alloy) fittings. The front bears a biwa (Japanese lute) shaped bar which when removed reveals four doors enclosing two internal compartments separated by a shelf, the bottom compartment containing a tray. Each side is adorned with elaborate metalwork depicting sprays of kiku (chrysanthemum) and the back has two kiri mon (paulownia crest) above which there is a handle attached to a kiku mon (chrysanthemum crest) shaped plate. These two crests of high-ranking families appear throughout the fittings. Japan 16th/17th century Momoyama period Dimensions H. 34½" x W. 23¼" x D. 19½" (87cm x 51cm x 49cm) The kiri mon (paulownia crest) has always been a symbol of great authority in Japan appropriated by the most powerful shogunates holding command of the country and was originally the private symbol of the Japanese Imperial Family from as early as the 12th century. During the Muromachi period (1333-1573) it was used by the Ashikaga shogunate, a dynasty originating from one of the plethora of Japanese daimyo (shogunates) which governed Japan. During the Azuchi-Momoyama period (1573-1603) the paulownia crest was adopted by the Toyotomi clan led by Toyotomi Hideyoshi (1536-1598) and was used from 1583 until 1598. Later appropriated by the Tokugawa shogunate (1600-1868) it was retained as a symbol of power during the Meiji Restoration from 1868 and it is still used as the emblem of the Japanese government to this day. Kiku mon (chrysanthemum crest) represents the Emperor of Japan as the symbol of the sovereignty of the State as well as the members of the Imperial Family.
    [Show full text]
  • Art and Archaeology of East and Southeast Asia the LIBRARY OF
    Art and Archaeology of East and Southeast Asia THE LIBRARY OF DR. JAN FONTEIN Former Director of the Museum of Fine Arts, Boston Partial catalogue April 2018 The Boston Globe June 28, 2017 Jan Fontein, historian of Asian art and former MFA director, dies at 89 Museum of Fine Arts, Boston Dr. Fontein helped install the "Money Tree" in the exhibition "Stories from China's Past" in July 1987. As a boy growing up in the Netherlands, Jan Fontein found his calling as a museum director and art historian when he chanced upon an exhibit of ancient artifacts that animated his imagination. “When I was 8 years old, I was taken to a museum in Holland which focused on Roman antiquities. I have a very vivid recollection of that moment,” he told the Globe in 1985. “I saw a dirty old case filled with flint arrowheads. That sounds dull. But I saw the arrowheads as direct messages to me. I envisioned a battle in all its mad glory.” The arrowheads “were not works of art,” he added. “They were simple, humble objects. But they were a way for me to communicate with the past. That was exciting.” While serving from 1975 to 1987 as director of the Museum of Fine Arts, Boston, Dr. Fontein shared his enthusiasm about art and ancient centuries with hundreds of thousands of visitors who poured into the blockbuster shows that the MFA staged. He also ushered the institution into the modern era of museums as cultural marketplaces, overseeing the fund-raising and creation of the I.M.
    [Show full text]