DOCSLIB.ORG

Copper River Delta

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Copper River Delta United States Department of Agriculture Classification of Community Forest Service Pacific Northwest Types, Successional Research Station General Technical Sequences, and Report PNW-GTR-469 March 2000 Landscapes of the Copper River Delta, Alaska Keith Boggs Author Keith Boggs is the staff vegetation ecologist, Alaska Natural Heritage Program, Environment and Natural Resources Institute, School of Arts and Sciences, University of Alaska Anchorage, 707 A Street, Anchorage, AK 99501. This publication is the result of a cooperative study between the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Chugach National Forest and the Alaska Natural Heritage Program. Abstract Boggs, Keith. 2000 Classification of community types, successional sequences, and landscapes of the Copper River Delta, Alaska. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-469. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 244 p. A classification of community types, successional sequences, and landscapes is pre- sented for the piedmont of the Copper River Delta. The classification was based on a sampling of 471 sites. A total of 75 community types, 42 successional sequences, and 6 landscapes are described. The classification of community types reflects the existing vegetation communities on the landscape. The distribution, vegetation composition and structure, soils, and successional status of each community are discussed. The community types were placed within successional sequences reflecting their succes- sional trends. Geomorphic and soil development were closely aligned with vegetation succession on the study area and, consequently, are described in detail. Each succes- sional sequence was named after the oldest community type identified in the sequence and the landscape on which it occurs. Diagnostic keys, based on indicator species, are provided to aid in field identification of community types and successional sequences. The dominant landscapes, including outwash plain, tidal marsh, and floodplain, are described by using environmental processes, such as geomorphology, hydrology, and soil development, and by integrating communities and successional sequences into these processes. Keywords: Alaska, Copper River Delta, classification, community type, succession, landscape, outwash, floodplain, delta, dune, barrier island. Summary A classification is presented to provide resource managers with an understanding of the vegetation communities, successional processes, and landscapes of the Copper River Delta. A classification integrating communities, succession, and landscapes is important because vegetation succession and communities can best be described and understood by first interpreting the landscapes on which they exist. The study area is a discontinuous series of coastal deltas and alluvial piedmonts in south-central Alaska encompassing about 700,000 acres. Mountain range spurs inter- rupt the piedmont, and the largest glacial system in North America (Bering Glacier) borders the eastern side. Elevation on the study area ranges from 0 to 300 feet above sea level. Human-caused disturbance is limited primarily to timber harvesting on proximal outwash plains. The vegetation on the Copper River Delta is dynamic and unstable because of tectonic uplift and geomorphic processes, such as erosion and deposition of sediments on tide- flats and glacial river channels. Of special concern is the change in vegetation initiated by an earthquake in 1964 that uplifted the area 6 to 12 feet. Before 1964, the seaward portion of the piedmont was covered by tidal marshes dominated by sedges (Carex spp.) and mixed grass/forb communities. The earthquake lifted these marshes above the tidal influence, initiating massive changes in vegetation composition and structure. Some tidal marsh communities described as common in previous studies are now rare or absent. The uplifted tidal mudflats are presently developing tidal marshes. These vegetation changes in turn have strongly affected such management concerns as nesting habitat for the dusky Canada goose, staging ground for shorebirds, and the moose population of the delta. This classification is divided into three sections: (1) landscape descriptions, (2) suc- cessional sequence descriptions, and (3) community type descriptions. Landscapes (analogous to landtype association from ECOMAP 1993) comprise the broadest level of the classification. Six landscapes were identified: (1) outwash plain, (2) floodplain, (3) linear dune, (4) uplifted marsh, (5) tidal marsh, and (6) barrier island-spit-coastal dune. Sediment deposition or erosion from fluvial and aeolian processes are the domi- nant driving successional forces on these landscapes. Landscape descriptions include landform, distribution, effect of the 1964 earthquake, and geomorphic processes. Each landscape adds greatly to the biological, habitat, and landform diversity of the Copper River Delta, often with community types, plant species, and successional sequences showing a high fidelity to specific landscapes. The successional sequence classification level describes the full sequence of vegeta- tion succession and landform-soil development. Community types are placed within successional sequences reflecting their successional trends and pathways. Geomorphic and soil development are closely aligned with vegetation succession on the study area and, consequently, are described in detail. A total of 42 successional sequences are identified, and each is named after the oldest community type identified in the sequence and the landscape on which it occurs. A diagnostic key, based on indicator species and landform, is provided to aid in field identification of the sequences. Each successional sequence exhibits high fidelity to specific landscapes. Community types describe existing vegetation and are analogous to the plant associa- tion level of “The National Vegetation Classification Standard” (Bourgeron and Engelking 1994) and to types described at level V of “The Alaska Vegetation Classification” (Viereck and others 1992). Seventy-five communities (plus 35 under- sampled communities) are described. Community type descriptions include other studies of the region, distribution of the community type, vegetation structure and composition, environmental factors such as soils and hydrology, and how each com- munity type fits into succession. A diagnostic key, based on indicator species, is pro- vided to aid in field identification of community types. Contents 1 Introduction 4 Study Area and Climate 6 Ecological Terms and Concepts 6 Community Types, Successional Sequences, and Landscapes 9 Methods 10 Field Methods 14 Data Analysis 15 Rarity Status of Landscapes and Community Types 15 Landscapes 16 Community Types 17 Statewide Rare Communities 18 Landscape Descriptions 18 Overview of Processes Forming the Copper River Delta 20 Outwash Plain Landscape 24 Floodplain Landscape 26 Uplifted Marsh Landscape 29 Linear Dune Landscape 31 Tidal Marsh Landscape 35 Barrier Island-Spit-Coastal Dune Landscape 40 Key to Successional Sequences 41 Instructions 42 Key to Life Forms and Landscape Groups 43 Key to Tidal Marsh Successional Sequences 43 Key to Tree Successional Sequences 45 Other Successional Sequences 50 Successional Sequence Descriptions 50 Outwash Plain and Floodplain Successional Sequences 57 Uplifted Marsh Successional Sequences 64 Linear Dune Successional Sequences 65 Tidal Marsh Successional Sequences 68 Barrier Island-Spit-Coastal Dune Successional Sequences 72 Key to Community Types 72 Instructions 72 Key to Life Form Groups 73 Key to Tree Communities 75 Key to Shrub Communities 76 Key to Sitka Alder Communities 77 Key to Willow Communities 79 Key to Sweetgale Communities 80 Key to Dwarf Shrub Communities 80 Key to Graminoid Communities 83 Key to Forb Communities 85 Key to Aquatic Communities 86 Tree Community Type Descriptions 86 Picea sitchensis/Alnus crispa Community Type 87 Picea sitchensis/Bryophyte Community Type 89 Picea sitchensis/Echinopanax horridum Community Type 90 Picea sitchensis/Rubus spectabilis Community Type 91 Picea sitchensis/Sphagnum Community Type 91 Picea sitchensis/Vaccinium ovalifolium Community Type 93 Picea sitchensis/Vaccinium ovalifolium-Echinopanax horridum Community Type 95 Picea sitchensis/Vaccinium ovalifolium/Lysichiton americanum Community Type 96 Populus trichocarpa/Aruncus sylvester Community Type 97 Populus trichocarpa/Alnus crispa Community Type 99 Populus trichocarpa-Picea sitchensis Community Type 100 Populus trichocarpa/Young Community Type 102 Tsuga heterophylla/Vaccinium ovalifolium Community Type 103 Tsuga heterophylla/Vaccinium ovalifolium-Echinopanax horridum Community Type 105 Tsuga heterophylla/Vaccinium ovalifolium/Lysichiton americanum Community Type 106 Shrub Community Type Descriptions 106 Alnus crispa/Calamagrostis canadensis Community Type 107 Alnus crispa/Equisetum arvense Community Type 108 Alnus crispa/Rubus spectabilis Community Type 110 Alnus crispa/Salix Community Type 110 Empetrum nigrum-Carex pluriflora Community Type 112 Myrica gale/Carex lyngbyaei Community Type 113 Myrica gale/Carex sitchensis Community Type 115 Myrica gale/Empetrum nigrum Community Type 116 Myrica gale/Epilobium angustifolium Community Type 118 Myrica gale/Equisetum variegatum Community Type 119 Undersampled Myrica gale (Sweetgale) Community Type 119 Rubus spectabilis-Echinopanax horridum Community Type 119 Salix alaxensis Community Type 119 Salix arctica/Carex lyngbyaei Community Type 120 Salix barclayi/Carex pluriflora
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Translocation and Transport
    Glime, J. M. 2017. Nutrient Relations: Translocation and Transport. Chapt. 8-5. In: Glime, J. M. Bryophyte Ecology. Volume 1. 8-5-1 Physiological Ecology. Ebook sponsored by Michigan Technological University and the International Association of Bryologists. Last updated 17 July 2020 and available at <http://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/bryophyte-ecology/>. CHAPTER 8-5 NUTRIENT RELATIONS: TRANSLOCATION AND TRANSPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS Translocation and Transport ................................................................................................................................ 8-5-2 Movement from Older to Younger Tissues .................................................................................................. 8-5-6 Directional Differences ................................................................................................................................ 8-5-8 Species Differences ...................................................................................................................................... 8-5-8 Mechanisms of Transport .................................................................................................................................... 8-5-9 Source to Sink? ............................................................................................................................................ 8-5-9 Enrichment Effects ..................................................................................................................................... 8-5-10 Internal Transport
    [Show full text]
  • Geomorphic Classification of Rivers
    9.36 Geomorphic Classification of Rivers JM Buffington, U.S. Forest Service, Boise, ID, USA DR Montgomery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA Published by Elsevier Inc. 9.36.1 Introduction 730 9.36.2 Purpose of Classification 730 9.36.3 Types of Channel Classification 731 9.36.3.1 Stream Order 731 9.36.3.2 Process Domains 732 9.36.3.3 Channel Pattern 732 9.36.3.4 Channel–Floodplain Interactions 735 9.36.3.5 Bed Material and Mobility 737 9.36.3.6 Channel Units 739 9.36.3.7 Hierarchical Classifications 739 9.36.3.8 Statistical Classifications 745 9.36.4 Use and Compatibility of Channel Classifications 745 9.36.5 The Rise and Fall of Classifications: Why Are Some Channel Classifications More Used Than Others? 747 9.36.6 Future Needs and Directions 753 9.36.6.1 Standardization and Sample Size 753 9.36.6.2 Remote Sensing 754 9.36.7 Conclusion 755 Acknowledgements 756 References 756 Appendix 762 9.36.1 Introduction 9.36.2 Purpose of Classification Over the last several decades, environmental legislation and a A basic tenet in geomorphology is that ‘form implies process.’As growing awareness of historical human disturbance to rivers such, numerous geomorphic classifications have been de- worldwide (Schumm, 1977; Collins et al., 2003; Surian and veloped for landscapes (Davis, 1899), hillslopes (Varnes, 1958), Rinaldi, 2003; Nilsson et al., 2005; Chin, 2006; Walter and and rivers (Section 9.36.3). The form–process paradigm is a Merritts, 2008) have fostered unprecedented collaboration potentially powerful tool for conducting quantitative geo- among scientists, land managers, and stakeholders to better morphic investigations.
    [Show full text]
  • Inferences Based on ITS Molecular Phylogenetic Analyses
    Korean J. Pl. Taxon. (2011) Vol. 41 No. 3, pp.209-214 The taxonomic status of Angelica purpuraefolia and its allies in Korea : Inferences based on ITS molecular phylogenetic analyses Byoung Yoon Lee1,2*, Myounghai Kwak1, Jeong Eun Han1,3 and Se-Jung Kim1,4 1Wildlife Genetic Resources Center, National Institute of Biological Resources, Incheon 404-170, Korea 2Division of Microorganism, National Institute of Biological Resources, Incheon 404-170, Korea 3Department of Biology, Inha University, Incheon 402-751, Korea 4Genome analyses center, National Instrumentation Center for Environmental Management, Seoul 151-921, Korea (Received 29 August 2011; Revised 08 September 2011; Accepted 13 September 2011) ABSTRACT: The taxonomy of the umbelliferous species Angelica amurensis and its allies was reviewed on the basis of molecular phylogenies derived from sequences of nuclear ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacer (ITS) regions. Strict consensus of six minimal length 119-step trees derived from equally weighted maximum parsimony analysis of combined nuclear rDNA ITS1 and ITS2 sequences from 29 accessions of Angelica and outgroups indicated that Angelica purpuraefolia, known to be endemic to Korea, is the same species as A. amurensis. Comparisons of sequence pairs across both spacer regions revealed identity or 1-2 bp differences between A. purpuraefolia and A. amurensis. These results indicated that the two taxa are not distinguished taxonomically. Also, nuclear rDNA ITS regions are discussed as potential barcoding loci for identifying Korean Angelica. Keywords: Apiaceae, Angelica purpuraefolia, Angelica amurensis, DNA barcode The Korean endemic Angelica purpuraefolia Chung grows bioactivities have been protected by Korean patent law (Lee in mountainous areas in Gangwondo, Gyeongsangbugdo, and et al., 2005).
    [Show full text]
  • Fishing in the Cordova Area
    Southcentral Region Department of Fish and Game Fishing in the Cordova Area About Cordova Cordova is a small commercial fishing town (pop. 2,500) on the southeastern side of Prince William Sound, 52 air miles southeast of Valdez and 150 air miles southeast of Anchorage. The town can be reached only by air or by ferries. Check the Alaska Marine Highway website for more informa- tion about the ferries: www.dot.state.ak.us/amhs Alaska Natives originally settled the area around the Copper River Delta. The town of Cordova changed its name from Puerto Cordova in 1906 when the railroad was built to move copper ore. Commercial fishing has been a major industry The Scott River for Cordova since the 1940s, so please be careful around their boats and nets. The Division of Commercial Hotels, fishing charters, camping Fisheries offers a wealth of information on their website, For information about fishing charters, accommoda- including in-season harvest information at www.adfg. tions and other services in Cordova, contact the Chamber alaska.gov . of Commerce and Visitor’s Center at P.O. Box 99, Cordova, Bears are numerous in the Cordova area and anglers Alaska, 99574, (907) 424-7260 or cordovachamber.com. The should use caution when fishing salmon spawning areas. City of Cordova also runs an excellent website at www. Check the ADF&G website for the “Bear Facts” brochure, cityofcordova.net . or request one from the ADF&G Anchorage regional of- fice. Anglers who fillet fish along a river are encouraged to chop up the fish carcass and throw the pieces into fast Management of Alaska’s flowing water.
    [Show full text]
  • Regulation Summary and Access for the Chitina
    Regulation Summary & you have fished or not, and whether you harvested Recording & Marking Catch fish or not. ONLINE HARVEST REPORTING: Both tips of the tail must be removed and all salmon Access for the Chitina http://fish.alaska.gov/PU. Failure to report is in taken must be recorded on the permit immediately Subdistrict Personal violation of 5 AAC 77.015(c), and is subject to a $200 with the date fished and catch by species, prior fine and loss of future personal use fishing privileges. to leaving the fishing site and before fish are Use Salmon Fishery concealed from plain view (5 AAC 77.591 (d)). For the purposes of this fishery, immediately“ ” Where Is the Chitina Subdistrict? Online permits and harvest reporting: means before concealing the fish from plain view The fishery is restricted to the waters of the mainstem http://fish.alaska.gov/PU or transporting the salmon from the fishing site. Copper River between the downstream edge of the “Fishing site” means the location where the fish Fishery opening recordings: Chitina-McCarthy Bridge and ADF&G regulatory is removed from the water and becomes part of the markers located about 200 yards upstream of Haley Glennallen: (907) 822-5224 permit holder’s bag limit. Creek. All tributaries of the Copper River in this area, Fairbanks: (907) 459-7382 including the Chitina River, are closed to personal use Personal Use Harvested Fish Anchorage: (907) 267-2511 fishing(map on reverse). Personal use harvested fish (including eggs) cannot ADF&G Chitina dip net website: be bought, sold, traded or bartered.
    [Show full text]
  • Safe Boating Through the St. Lucie Inlet
    Information: Florida Fish & Wildlife Commission 850-488-4676 SAFE BOATING US Coast Guard - Ft. Pierce 772-461-7606 THROUGH THE ST. LUCIE INLET US Coast Guard Auxiliary 772-465-8128 US Army Corps of Engineers 772-221-3349 St. Lucie Inlet Coastal 772-225-2300 Weather Station HERE ARE SOME THINGS TO REMEMBER: • Listen to the most recent weather forecast for the times you plan to go out AND come back in the inlet. • Look in the Tide Tables or local newspapers for the times St. Lucie Inlet of predicted high and low tides for the day you plan to go out. Remember the outgoing (ebb) tital current at low Newcomers tide is the worst time to make a passage through the St. Lucie Inlet. If you are a boater new to this area, it is highly • Safe boating practices are even more important in inlets. recommended that you make your first passage of Check your boat before you head out. Life preservers the St. Lucie Inlet as an observer. An experienced should be worn when going through inlets. boater with local knowledge at the helm can point • Expect the unexpected. Watch the clouds to anticipate out various hazards and conditions to avoid. This is severe weather such as thunderstorms. Be on the lookout for shifting shoals and changing channels. especially important if you have no prior experience • Engine failure is common in small boats in rough seas. with any ocean inlets. The extra roughness agitates gasoline and settled dirt or water in the fuel system, which can cause engine failure Notes on Navigation at Night at a crtical time.
    [Show full text]
  • State of New York City's Plants 2018
    STATE OF NEW YORK CITY’S PLANTS 2018 Daniel Atha & Brian Boom © 2018 The New York Botanical Garden All rights reserved ISBN 978-0-89327-955-4 Center for Conservation Strategy The New York Botanical Garden 2900 Southern Boulevard Bronx, NY 10458 All photos NYBG staff Citation: Atha, D. and B. Boom. 2018. State of New York City’s Plants 2018. Center for Conservation Strategy. The New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, NY. 132 pp. STATE OF NEW YORK CITY’S PLANTS 2018 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 INTRODUCTION 10 DOCUMENTING THE CITY’S PLANTS 10 The Flora of New York City 11 Rare Species 14 Focus on Specific Area 16 Botanical Spectacle: Summer Snow 18 CITIZEN SCIENCE 20 THREATS TO THE CITY’S PLANTS 24 NEW YORK STATE PROHIBITED AND REGULATED INVASIVE SPECIES FOUND IN NEW YORK CITY 26 LOOKING AHEAD 27 CONTRIBUTORS AND ACKNOWLEGMENTS 30 LITERATURE CITED 31 APPENDIX Checklist of the Spontaneous Vascular Plants of New York City 32 Ferns and Fern Allies 35 Gymnosperms 36 Nymphaeales and Magnoliids 37 Monocots 67 Dicots 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report, State of New York City’s Plants 2018, is the first rankings of rare, threatened, endangered, and extinct species of what is envisioned by the Center for Conservation Strategy known from New York City, and based on this compilation of The New York Botanical Garden as annual updates thirteen percent of the City’s flora is imperiled or extinct in New summarizing the status of the spontaneous plant species of the York City. five boroughs of New York City. This year’s report deals with the City’s vascular plants (ferns and fern allies, gymnosperms, We have begun the process of assessing conservation status and flowering plants), but in the future it is planned to phase in at the local level for all species.
    [Show full text]
  • Morphologic Characteristics of the Blow River Delta, Yukon Territory, Canada
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 1969 Morphologic Characteristics of the Blow River Delta, Yukon Territory, Canada. James Murl Mccloy Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Recommended Citation Mccloy, James Murl, "Morphologic Characteristics of the Blow River Delta, Yukon Territory, Canada." (1969). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 1605. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/1605 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This dissertation has been microfilmed exactly as received 70-252 McCLOY, James Murl, 1934- MORPHOLOGIC CHARACTERISTICS OF THE BLOW RIVER DELTA, YUKON TERRITORY, CANADA. The Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, Ph.D., 1969 Geography University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan Morphologic Characteristics of the Blow River Belta, Yukon Territory, Canada A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of Geography and Anthropology by James Murl McCloy B.A., State College at Los Angeles, 1961 May, 1969 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Research culminating in this dissertation was conducted under the auspices of the Arctic Institute of North America. The major portion of the financial support was received from the United States Army under contract no. BA-ARO-D-3I-I2I4.-G832, "Arctic Environmental Studies." Additional financial assistance during part of the writing stage was received in the form of a research assistantship from the Coastal Studies Institute, Louisi­ ana State University.
    [Show full text]
  • Population Ecology of Eriophorum Latifolium, a Clonal Species in Rich Fen Vegetation
    Anders Lyngstad Population Ecology of Eriophorum latifolium, a Clonal Species in Rich Fen Vegetation Thesis for the degree of Philosophiae Doctor Trondheim, October 2010 Norwegian University of Science and Technology Faculty of Natural Sciences and Technology Department of Biology NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology Thesis for the degree of Philosophiae Doctor Faculty of Natural Sciences and Technology Department of Biology © Anders Lyngstad ISBN 978-82-471-2332-4 (printed ver.) ISBN 978-82-471-2333-1 (electronic ver.) ISSN 1503-8181 Doctoral theses at NTNU, 2010:179 Printed by NTNU-trykk Synopsis PREFACE It was the spring of 2005, and it was the right time to move onwards. A position as a research fellow working with long-term time series at the Museum of Natural History and Archaeology at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) was announced, and a PhD-project was developed with the studies of former haymaking lands at Sølendet and Tågdalen nature reserves as a starting point. Work began in earnest in January 2006, and continued at an ever increasing pace until July 2010, when all the parts of the thesis were finally completed and assembled. The study was financed by NTNU, and was carried out at the Museum of Natural History and Archaeology and the Institute of Biology, both NTNU. I am deeply grateful to my main supervisor Professor Asbjørn Moen at the Museum of Natural History and Archaeology, and my co-supervisor Associate Professor Bård Pedersen at the Institute of Biology. This project rests on the long-term studies of rich hayfens that were initiated by Asbjørn 40 years ago, and that are still ongoing, much due to his continuous effort.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the Influence of Groyne Fields and Other Hard Defences on the Shoreline Configuration
    1 The Influence of Groyne Fields and Other Hard Defences on the Shoreline Configuration 2 of Soft Cliff Coastlines 3 4 Sally Brown1*, Max Barton1, Robert J Nicholls1 5 6 1. Faculty of Engineering and the Environment, University of Southampton, 7 University Road, Highfield, Southampton, UK. S017 1BJ. 8 9 * Sally Brown ([email protected], Telephone: +44(0)2380 594796). 10 11 Abstract: Building defences, such as groynes, on eroding soft cliff coastlines alters the 12 sediment budget, changing the shoreline configuration adjacent to defences. On the 13 down-drift side, the coastline is set-back. This is often believed to be caused by increased 14 erosion via the ‘terminal groyne effect’, resulting in rapid land loss. This paper examines 15 whether the terminal groyne effect always occurs down-drift post defence construction 16 (i.e. whether or not the retreat rate increases down-drift) through case study analysis. 17 18 Nine cases were analysed at Holderness and Christchurch Bay, England. Seven out of 19 nine sites experienced an increase in down-drift retreat rates. For the two remaining sites, 20 retreat rates remained constant after construction, probably as a sediment deficit already 21 existed prior to construction or as sediment movement was restricted further down-drift. 22 For these two sites, a set-back still evolved, leading to the erroneous perception that a 23 terminal groyne effect had developed. Additionally, seven of the nine sites developed a 24 set back up-drift of the initial groyne, leading to the defended sections of coast acting as 1 25 a hard headland, inhabiting long-shore drift.
    [Show full text]
  • 3.13 Paleontological Resources
    Gateway West Transmission Line Draft EIS 3.13 PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES This section addresses the potential impacts from the Proposed Route and Route Alternatives on the known paleontological resources during construction, operation, and decommissioning. The Proposed Route and Route Alternatives pass through areas where paleontological resources are known to exist. The routes, their potential impacts, and mitigation methods to minimize or eliminate impacts are discussed in this section. 3.13.1 Affected Environment This section describes the mapped geology and known paleontological resources near the Proposed Action. It also describes and compares potential impacts of the Proposed Action and Action Alternatives to paleontological resources. Fossils are important scientific and educational resources because of their use in: 1) documenting the presence and evolutionary history of particular groups of now extinct organisms, 2) reconstructing the environments in which these organisms lived, and 3) determining the relative ages of the strata in which they occur. Fossils are also important in determining the geologic events that resulted in the deposition of the sediments in which they were buried. 3.13.1.1 Analysis Area The Project area in Wyoming and Idaho consists of predominantly north-south trending mountain ranges separated by structural basins. The eastern portion of the Project (Segments 1 and 2) would be located within the Laramie Mountains and the Shirley Mountains, which consist predominantly of Precambrian granite and gneisses. Moving west in Wyoming, the Project would cross major structural basins created during the Laramide Orogeny, including the Hanna Basin in Carbon County (Segment 2), and the Greater Green River Basin in Sweetwater County (Segments 3 and 4).
    [Show full text]
  • Experiments on Patterns of Alluvial Cover and Bedrock Erosion in a Meandering Channel Roberto Fernández1, Gary Parker1,2, Colin P
    Earth Surf. Dynam. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-2019-8 Manuscript under review for journal Earth Surf. Dynam. Discussion started: 27 February 2019 c Author(s) 2019. CC BY 4.0 License. Experiments on patterns of alluvial cover and bedrock erosion in a meandering channel Roberto Fernández1, Gary Parker1,2, Colin P. Stark3 1Ven Te Chow Hydrosystems Laboratory, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois at 5 Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA 2Department of Geology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA 3Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University, Palisades, NY 10964, USA Correspondence to: Roberto Fernández ([email protected]) Abstract. 10 In bedrock rivers, erosion by abrasion is driven by sediment particles that strike bare bedrock while traveling downstream with the flow. If the sediment particles settle and form an alluvial cover, this mode of erosion is impeded by the protection offered by the grains themselves. Channel erosion by abrasion is therefore related to the amount and pattern of alluvial cover, which are functions of sediment load and hydraulic conditions, and which in turn are functions of channel geometry, slope and sinuosity. This study presents the results of alluvial cover experiments conducted in a meandering channel flume of high fixed 15 sinuosity. Maps of quasi-instantaneous alluvial cover were generated from time-lapse imaging of flows under a range of below- capacity bedload conditions. These maps were used to infer patterns
    [Show full text]