<<

06/04/19

Why “”? • Embryonal tumors are highly malignant, poorly differentiated neoplasms, occurring especially in young children and adolescents • They are a very heterogeneous group, with tumor cells that may display differentiation along multiple lineages • Tumors with only neuronal differentiation are termed CNS or, if ganglion cells are also present, CNS • These latter are exceedingly rare!!! Neuroblastoma • 7-8% of all pediatric tumors Other embryonal tumors including - 3rd most common (after leukemia & CNS tumors) neuroblastoma, ATRT… • 90% of patients < age 5 years Andrea Rossi, MD • Origin: sympathetic nervous Neuroradiology Unit system G. Gaslini Children’s Hospital - Genoa, Italy [email protected]

NBL metastases

Extra-axial Intra-axial >> hemorrhagic

Why “…”? WHO classification of CNS tumors 2007 Aims of this lecture:

To not deal with peripheral neuroblastoma

To provide information regarding the recent advances in the understanding of CNS embryonal tumors, with the exception of

To highlight some relevant neuroimaging features and pitfalls in these tumors

Louis et al. IARC, Lyon 2007

1 06/04/19

WHO classification of CNS tumors 2007 Primitive neuroectodermal tumors (PNET) • WHO grade IV • Supratentorial embryonal tumor composed of undifferentiated or poorly differentiated neuroepithelial cells • Age range: 4 weeks to 10 years • Biological behavior: markedly aggressive, poor response to therapy, but unpredictable based on histology & imaging

Louis et al. IARC, Lyon 2007

WHO classification of CNS tumors 2007 WHO classification of CNS tumors 2016

*

Louis et al. IARC, Lyon 2007 *new entities; provisional entities Louis et al. 2016 Acta Neuropathol

Neuroblastoma Medulloblastoma PNET Pineoblastoma

Ependymoma Medulloblastoma PNET Central Pilocytic

2 06/04/19

Embryonal Tumors and Rosettes Embryonal Tumor with Multilayered Rosettes (ETMR) perceived as a poorly defined diagnosis, several proposals made to retire it Embryonal tumor with abundant neuropil Ependymoblastoma: concentric rings of primitive tumor cells around a and true rosettes central lumen, the cells facing the lumen sometimes forming an internal Ependymoblastoma (ETANTR) limiting membrane, and with the cells in the outer rim merging with the (EBL) (MEPL) surrounding undifferentiated neuroectodermal cells

C19MC present in 95% C19MC present in 75%

• primarily occur in children < 2 yrs age

Medulloepithelioma: distinctive, pseudostratified epithelium, arranged • poor outcome despite aggressive in papillary and tubular patterns that resemble the structure of the primitive treatment neural tube with a limiting membrane on the outside of these structures • defined histologically by rosettes, which resemble primitive neural tubes First report in 2000, never made it into the WHO classification • amplifications at 19q13.42 ETANTR (embryonal tumor with abundant neuropil and involving the C19MC cluster true rosettes): combining features of ependymoblastoma and central neuroblastoma, such that clusters of primitive appearing cells alternate with Korshunov A et al. Embryonal tumor with abundant neuropil and true rosettes (ETANTR), ependymoblastoma, and a nuclear regions of neuropil, more mature appearing neuronal elements, medulloepithelioma share molecular similarity and comprise a single clinicopathological entity. Acta Neuropathol. 2014 Aug;128(2):279-89. and true ependymoblastic rosettes containing well-formed central lumina

ETMR

Picard D et al. Markers of survival and metastatic potential in childhood CNS primitive neuro-ectodermal brain tumours: Archer TC, Pomeroy SL. A developmental program drives aggressive embryonal brain tumors. Nat Genet. 2014 Jan;46(1):2-3. an integrative genomic analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2012 Aug;13(8):838-48.

LIN28A binds small RNA and has been implicated in stem pluripotency, metabolism and tumorigenesis

• A biologic diagnosis with LIN28A immuno-histochemistry and the search for amplification of the locus 19q13.42 should be systematically done to ensure diagnosis • Prognosis remains dismal, but complete surgical removal seems to be an important part of the treatment • Radiotherapy may be another crucial point of the treatment but has to be balanced with neurocognitive toxicity that can be caused in young children ETMR ATRT Anaplastic and maintenance chemotherapy may be useful, but their respective roles remain to be determined Korshunov A et al. LIN28A immunoreactivity is a potent diagnostic marker of embryonal tumor with multilayered rosettes (ETMR). Acta Neuropathol. 2012 Dec;124(6):875-81.

3 06/04/19

All embryonal tumors (not just medulloblastoma) may involve the posterior cranial fossa

© Edmonson CA, 2016

Location: • Cerebral hemispheres 76 % ETMR ATRT MB • 11 % • Brain stem 9 % • Pre-sacral space 2 % • Optic nerve 2 %

ETMR • 3-year-old boy Neuroradiological features • History of headaches • Large size • Cerebral hemispheric location • Admitted for first • Structural heterogeneity Disclaimer: imaging at Ancona (Pol. Salesi), patient (hemorrhage, calcification, necrosis, ) • Lack of perifocal edema referred to Gaslini Inst. for surgical management • Restricted diffusion • Mild/Lack of contrast enhancement +C

CNS embryonal tumor, NOS, F 2y

+C

Color-coded ADC

Exophytic behavior

ETANTR CNS embryonal tumor, NOS M 2y

4 06/04/19

• Deletion at 22q11.2 Atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumor (ATRT) • Loss of expression of the INI1 • Malignant embryonal CNS tumor (WHO grade IV) (SMARCB1) gene • Less than 2% of all CNS tumors in the pediatric • SWI/SNF chromatin-remodeling population but 10% of those seen in children under complex 12 months of age • Composed of rhabdoid cells, with or without fields resembling embryonal tumors, epithelial tissue, and neoplastic mesenchyme • Ubiquitous, >> kidney (MRT-K)

cytogenetics

Sredni ST, Tomita T. Rhabdoid tumor predisposition syndrome. Pediatr Dev Pathol. 2015 ; 18:49-58.

• Deletion at 22q11.2 • Loss of expression of the INI-1 INI1/SNF5 (SMARCB1) immunostaining (SMARCB1) gene • SWI/SNF chromatin-remodeling complex

• Second gene: BRG-1 (SMARCA4) on chr. 19 Fruhwald MC et al. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2006; 47:273–278 • Mutations can involve the positive negative somatic or germ lines

• No mut: CNS embryonal tumor ATRT with rhabdoid features Sredni ST, Tomita T. Rhabdoid tumor predisposition syndrome. Pediatr Dev Pathol. 2015 ; 18:49-58.

Malignant rhabdoid tumor of the kidney

Rhabdoid tumor predisposition syndrome (RTPS)

2004 Histology: PNET, no rhabdoid cells Germline inactivation of 1 allele of a gene. Some familial cases. Immunostaining: INI1 - RTPS1: mutation in the INI-1 (SMARCB1) gene RTPS2: mutation in the BRG-1 (SMARCA4) gene ATRT

5 06/04/19

Rhabdoid tumor predisposition syndrome (RTPS)

Germ-line INI1 mutations appear to be more common in patients with multicentric tumors, in those presenting < 1 year, and in

familial cases Sredni ST, Tomita T. Rhabdoid tumor predisposition syndrome. Pediatr Dev Pathol. 2015 ; 18:49-58.

ATRT: location ATRT are typically structurally heterogeneous • Posterior fossa 52% • Supratentorial 39% Tumor aggressiveness • Pineal 5% No respect of anatomic • Spinal 2% boundaries (i.e., ) • Multifocal 2%

Admixture of:

• Solid components • Cystic-necrotic regions • Hemorrhage • Calcifications • Vasogenic edema

ATRT can be primitively intra-axial, extra-axial, or both

Marginal cysts

Prenatal ASL assessment Fetal MRI

ATRT, F 6m

6 06/04/19

ATRT, F 6m ATRT, M 2m

ASL ATRT: special features

Rapid disease progression and recurrences age 4 days despite chemo- and radiotherapy

age 5 months 22/3/2002 9/5/2002

Disseminated ATRT, M 8y

Lack of enhancement in embryonal tumors Metastases of non enhancing tumors may also not enhance!

FLAIR T1 +C FLAIR T1 +C

medulloblastoma ATRT ETMR 02/05/2008 15/10/2008 Restricted diffusion due to high cellularity DWI ADC DWI ADC

Medulloblastoma - off therapy for 1 year

7 06/04/19

Conclusions:

1. The neuro-oncological world is changing fast! 2. Neuroradiologists need to keep updated and must not be left behind if they want to stay relevant 3. In the new WHO classification, several tumors span various histologies (and imaging features!) but comprise single molecular diseases 4. These new categories warrant specific therapeutic strategies 5. Embryonal tumors have been markedly restructured in the new classification 6. “PNETs” no longer exist THANK YOU!

[email protected]

8