2020 API Women's Leadership Conference LEAD. CHANGE
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
State Issues
Week of January 14, 2019 State Issues Legislative Analyst This week, the Legislative Analyst’s Office (LAO) released its overview of Governor Newsom’s budget proposal for FY Report on State 2019-20 that was presented last week, and saw a new leader selected to lead this non-partisan organization. The Budget Legislature appointed a new state Legislative Analyst to fill the role Mac Taylor has held for 10 years. They named Gabriel Petek to the post, who most recently worked for Standard and Poor’s Global Ratings San Francisco Office where he is currently the state’s primary credit analyst. He takes the reins on February 4. In addition to getting a new chief, the LAO released its overview of the Governor’s January budget highlighting that that state’s budget position continues to be strong. They also focus on the fact that the Governor’s proposed budget prioritizes the repayments of state debts and a great deal of one-time funding. Nearly half of the discretionary spending is earmarked to pay down state liabilities, including unfunded retirement liabilities and budget debts. Twenty-five (25) percent of the discretionary spending is for one time or temporary funding proposals, and 15 percent for discretionary reserves. The LAO applauds the Governor’s decision to focus on the repayment of state debts. The LAO points out one thing that many took note of – the Governor has outlined many priorities for budgetary spending. And at least some of the proposals are not fully fleshed out or reflected in the budget document. The LAO was not critical of this but pointed out that these un-finalized proposals give the Legislature the opportunity to weigh in with the Administration and have their say in its development. -
National Elections
Welcome Saundra Jacobs ISDOC President Santa Margarita Water District ISDOC Quarterly “Luncheon” – October 29, 2020 Thank you for joining today’s meeting. Participants will be muted. To be called on to speak: • Please raise your hand • Use the chat box (to text the host) Agenda • Press *9 to raise hand on phone Reports Executive Committee Report Saundra Jacobs Director, Santa Margarita Water District Reports Treasurer’s Report Joan Finnegan Director, Municipal Water District of Orange County Reports CSDA Report Arlene Schafer Director, Costa Mesa Sanitary District Reports ACWA Report Mary Aileen Matheis Director, Irvine Ranch Water District Reports OCCOG Report Mike Scheafer Director, Costa Mesa Sanitary District Reports Orange County Operational Area Mark Monin Director, El Toro Water District Program Speaker Adam Probolsky Probolsky Research •Election 2020 • Briefing October 2020 23 Corporate Plaza Drive Suite 150 100 Pine Street Suite 1250 1629 K Street Suite 300 Newport Beach CA 92660 San Francisco CA 94111 Washington DC 20006 (949) 855 6400 (415) 870 8150 (202) 559 0270 Probolsky Research - Firm Background • Established in Established in 1992, Probolsky Research is an independent Latina and woman-owned market and opinion research firm with corporate, election, government, and non-profit clients. The firm has offices in Newport Beach and San Francisco, CA, and Washington DC. • Adam Probolsky is president of Probolsky Research; a Latina- and woman-owned, market and opinion research firm with corporate/association, election, government and political practice areas. Adam has acted as pollster and strategic advisor on hundreds of successful crisis communications and public affairs projects, local, special district, county and statewide initiatives and candidate campaigns as well as public education and outreach efforts. -
California Elections and Community College Measures November 2016 Election Round up November 14, 2016
California Elections and Community College Measures November 2016 Election Round Up November 14, 2016 OVERVIEW While the election was last week, ballots are still being counted and final certified results are due to the Secretary of State for presidential electors on December 6, 2016, and for all other state contests on December 9, 2016. The Secretary of State will certify the statewide results by December 16, 2016. Until the results are certified, the outcome of close races may change from what is presented below. Focusing on results affecting California Community Colleges, the election provided mostly positive results including the passage of the statewide bond measure, Proposition 51, as well as a number of local bonds. Californians passed several tax measures including Proposition 55, which will continue to provide funding for education. Voters in San Francisco passed an extension of the parcel tax to help fund the City College of San Francisco as well as another local measure that increases the transfer tax rate for sales of residential and commercial properties. Proponents state, that with the passage of this measure, the City of San Francisco could provide free community college. Funds from this local measure will go to the City’s general fund; however, in July, the Board of Supervisors passed a resolution making the City College of San Francisco free for residents a top priority for the new revenue. If results hold in the State Assembly, the Democrats will have gained a supermajority with three seats switching party hands. However, this could change because one of those seats remains a close contest in Assembly District 55 and all three changes are needed for a supermajority. -
California's Top-Two Primary
California's Top-two Primary: A Successful Reform I Charles T. Munger, Jr. (Dated: February 22, 2019) This is the first of three concurrent papers on California's top-two primary, California's Top-two Primary: A Successful Reform I, II, and III; this abstract covers all three. A common summary of the conclusions of all three papers appears in III, section VI. The top-two primary yielded 80 same-party general elections in California, for the Assembly, state Senate, and U.S. House of Representatives combined, in the general elections of 2012, 2014, and 2016. Of these same-party district elections, 22 saw the re-election of incumbents running against a token opponent of their own party. The remaining 58 were highly competitive: a total of $205 million was spent in those contests; 10 incumbents were defeated. In contrast, over the not three but five election cycles from 2002 to 2010, when there were partisan primaries, an incumbent lost to a member of his own party in 1 race for the Assembly, 1 race for the state Senate, and 1 race for the U.S. House, for a decade total of 3. Of the 58 competitive same-party elections, the candidate who took second in the primary, and who would have been eliminated from the general election ballot in a system of partisan primaries, actually won 20 (34%). The number of voters who cast a ballot in these 80 same-party general elections was essentially double (1:9 times) the number who cast a ballot in the same election in the primary. -
A Changing Legislature? 12 Bogh (R) Leading Vs
The State Results Are (Almost) In Results shown are as of noon on Nov. 6. Current outcomes for ballot measures, elected offices of interest to California hospitals Ballot Measures More Elections Election Results Timeline of Interest Coming? 1 County officials have 30 days to count ballots Pass Fail The following races could trigger and conduct a post-election audit. Final results Senate special elections: must be reported to the Secretary of State for the presidential contest by Dec. 1 and all other Leaning Authorizes $5.5 billion Prop. 14: • Los Angeles County Supervisor: contests by Dec. 4. The Secretary of State will Pass in general obligation bonds for the 2 Sen. Holly Mitchell (D-Los Angeles) 4 certify results on Dec. 11. Vote-by-mail ballots state’s stem cell research institute. defeated Los Angeles City postmarked on or before Election Day can Councilmember Herb Wesson arrive until Nov. 20 and still be counted. Leaning Prop. 15: A split roll property tax Fail that increases taxes by reassessing • San Diego County Supervisor: 6 business property every three years, Community College Board Member 3 including investor-owned hospitals. Nora Vargas leading vs. Sen. Ben Hueso (i)Scott Wilk (R) leading (D-San Diego) 9 5 vs. Kipp Mueller (D), CHA opposed 11 11 7 10 13 15 8 SD 21 Prop. 16: A Constitutional amendment that reinstates Rosilicie Ochoa affirmative action in university A Changing Legislature? 12 Bogh (R) leading vs. admissions and public hiring. Abigail Medina Races that will impact the makeup CHA supported (D), SD 23 of the Legislature Map shows Senate districts by party affiliation 17 14 Prop. -
California Election Breakdown
California Election Breakdown As campaigning really gears up with less than two weeks until the election, CRA wanted to highlight some races below that our members may find interesting to watch. Additionally, there are more in-depth analyses of competitive races on the following pages. Though there are no projected changes for control of the state legislature, the Democrats are targeting plenty of vulnerable Republican incumbents in the state house where voter registration trends have changed in their favor, which include Assembly Districts 35, 36, 55, and 68 and Senate District 21, 29, and 37. The Republicans, in addition to holding on to their vulnerable seats, are targeting a couple vulnerable Democrats themselves in Assembly Districts 74 and 77. However, the most interesting race may be the one that takes place behind closed doors: Assembly leadership. The end of session fiasco showed some intraparty and interhouse tensions coming to a head with bills dying at midnight as behind the scene squabbles made their way to the floor. The Speaker also came under fire for a proxy voting decision he made, which made national news headlines. Additionally, there is a vacancy in the Assembly leadership with Assembly Majority Leader’s decision to not run for re-election. This will all likely happen outside the public view, but it is something to watch for after the General Election. The story is a little bit different for congressional races. Democrats rode a wave of national enthusiasm to pick up some seats in traditionally Republican strongholds, such as the Central Valley and Orange County. -
2018 Legislative Scorecard
2018 LEGISLATIVE S CORECARD Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California (PPAC) advocates on a number of legislative and regulatory issues that impact reproductive health, women’s health and rights, sexual health education, and access to affordable and quality health care. The PPAC Legislative Scorecard is designed to provide the public with information about how their state legislators voted on these important issues. Below are the bills that represented PPAC’s highest priority in 2018 and the scores for each legislator based on their vote. The 2018 scorecard includes the vote record for state legislators who currently represent Californians in elected office. To keep up on the latest information about PPAC’s public policy and advocacy programs, go to our website at www.PPActionCA.org. Description of Scored Legislation The Budget Act of 2018 – SB 856 (Committee on Budget Fiscal Review) In 2016, the voters approved Proposition 56, to among other things, ensures timely access, limited geographic shortages of services, and ensures quality care for all patients. This Budget Jr. bill allocated $1 billion to Proposition 56, the bill continued a second year of funding ($50 million) for “women’s health” services by cross referencing the budget signed in 2017 (Ch 22. Stat.2017). Status: Signed into Law. AB 2601 (Weber) This bill extends the California Healthy Youth Act (AB 329, Weber, 2015), which requires comprehensive and inclusive sexual health education for middle and high school students, to include public charter schools. Status: Signed into Law. AJR 42 (Kamlager-Dove) Assembly Joint Resolution 42, is a resolution declaring the importance of the Title X program and urgent opposition to the proposed Gag Rule which would affect Title X providers. -
2020 Political Activities and Contributions Report
2020 ANNUAL REPORT POLITICAL ACTIVITIES & CONTRIBUTIONS Business Insurance Employee Benefits Auto Home 2020 ANNUAL REPORT POLITICAL ACTIVITIES & CONTRIBUTIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS PG. 1 | FAQS PG. 3 | BOARD OF DIRECTORS PG. 3 | FINANCIAL SUMMARY PG. 5 | DISBURSEMENTS PG. 7 | DISBURSEMENT METRICS PG. 11 | POLITICAL COMPLIANCE PG. 14 | 1 THE HARTFORD ADVOCATES FUND THE HARTFORD ADVOCATES FEDERAL FUND Frequently Asked Questions FAQs PG. 3 | BOARD OF DIRECTORS PG. 3 | MISSION STATEMENT PG. 3 | 2 FAQ BOARD OF DIRECTORS WHAT IS A POLITICAL ACTION HOW DO WE DO THIS? COMMITTEE (PAC)? Scott Lewis We want to be a leader within our Chairman Political Action Committees (PACs) industry and contribute constructively formed by individuals, groups or to good public policy. The Funds are companies allow individual crucial advocacy tools which help Mary Nasenbenny Vice Chairman contributions to be pooled and used amplify The Hartford’s exceptional to support candidates and voice with key public officials and lawmakers. The Funds support incumbents whose views are Thomas Bartell consistent with the mission of the candidates for public office who are President group or organization. Many different interested in understanding insurance constituencies, including business issues and develop good public groups, trade associations, labor policies to address them. Allison Niderno unions, and elected officials establish Treasurer PACs. PACs are a transparent way for WHY IS PARTICIPATION citizens to meaningfully engage in the IMPORTANT? political process. Bill Kennedy Assistant Treasurer The Hartford’s exceptional voice is best amplified in Washington, D.C. THE HARTFORD PACs and across state capitols when we Jordan Canter help elect thoughtful lawmakers. -
Proposition 15
PROPOSITION 15 PROPOSITION 15 SUMMARY: ● Will require industrial and commercial properties be taxed based on their market value rather than their purchase price. Exempts taxation changes to business owners who have 3 million or less holding in CA. Exempts small business from personal property tax. ● Eliminate the loophole commercial industry properties took advantage of which enabled them to freeze their property tax rate ● 40% will go to education/local school districts (including public and charter schools) ● 60% will go to local governments and special districts SUPPORT: ● Organizations ○ Million Voter Project Action Fund (Sponsored by Social Justice Organization, Partnered with CHIRLA, AAPIs for CE Education Fund, ACCE, PICO California) ○ Silicon Valley Rising Action ○ Schools and Communities First (Sponsored by coalition of labor groups of Social Justice Representing families, students, and essential workers & ACLU Southern California) ○ HIP Committee for Schools & Committee First ● Statewide Elected Officials: ○ State Superintendent Tony Thurmond ○ U.S. Senator Kamala Harris ● Mayors (more here) ○ Graciela Ortiz, Vice Mayor of Huntington Park ○ Eric Garcetti, Mayor of Los Angeles ○ Alicia Romero, Vice Mayor of Bell ● City Councils: ○ Bob Blumenfield, Los Angeles City Council Member ○ Mike Bonin, Los Angeles City Council Member ○ Marqueece Harris-Dawson, Los Angeles City Council Member ○ Paul Koretz, Los Angeles City Council Member ○ David Ryu, Los Angeles City Council Member ○ Nury Martinez, Los Angeles City Council President -
Board of Registered Nursing – Legislation
Board of Registered Nursing – Legislation Thelma Harris, RN, PHN, MSN Chief of Legislation 2018 Elections The Results • 40th Governor of CA-Gavin Newsom • Elected with 62% of the vote • First time Democrats won 3 consecutive gubernatorial elections • Trifecta-one party holds governorship, majority in Senate and Assembly Representation At the Legislature Assembly Representation California Nursing Programs are represented By 71 out of 80 Assembly Members California Nursing Programs California Nursing Programs Assembly Member ADN BSN ELM Total Assembly Member ADN BSN ELM Total Adam C. Gray (D) 2 2 Ken Cooley (D) 1 1 2 Adrin Nazarian (D) 1 1 Kevin Kiley (R) 1 1 Al Muratuschi (D) 1 1 Kevin McCarty (D) 2 1 1 4 Ash Kalra (D) 1 1 2 Kevin Mullin (D) 1 1 Autumn R. Burke (D) 1 1 Laura Friedman (D) 3 3 Bill Quirk (D) 1 1 2 Lorena Gonzalez Fletcher (D) 1 1 Blanca E. Rubio (D) 1 1 1 3 Luz M. Rivas (D) 1 1 Brian Maienschein (D) 1 1 Marc Levine (D) 1 1 2 Buffy Wicks (R) 1 1 Marie Waldron (R) 1 1 2 Cecilia M. Aguiar-Curry (D) 2 1 3 Mark Stone (D) 2 2 Chad Mayes (R) 2 2 Miguel Santiago (D) 1 1 Chris R. Holden (D) 1 1 Mike A. Gipson (D) 1 1 2 Christy Smith (D) 1 1 Monique Limon (D) 2 2 Cottie Petrie-Norris (D) 1 3 1 5 Patrick O'Donnell (D) 2 2 1 5 Cristina Garcia (D) 1 1 Phillip Chen (R) 2 2 Devon J. -
Senate Payroll - 07/31/2020 Monthly BG Total Employee Name Description Office Name Salary Amount Salary ABBASI, RANA OFFICE ASSISTANT Senator Connie M
Senate Payroll - 07/31/2020 Monthly BG Total Employee Name Description Office Name Salary Amount Salary ABBASI, RANA OFFICE ASSISTANT Senator Connie M. Leyva $3,434.00 $0.00 $3,434.00 ABREGO, KAREN DISTRICT REPRESENTATIVE Senator Richard Pan $4,774.00 $0.00 $4,774.00 ACKLER, JOHN LEGISLATIVE DIRECTOR Senator Bob Archuleta $6,712.00 $0.00 $6,712.00 ACKLEY, HANNAH LEGISLATIVE DIRECTOR Senator Melissa Melendez $6,712.00 $0.00 $6,712.00 ADAM, ROBIN LEGISLATIVE DIRECTOR Senator Cathleen Galgiani $9,034.00 $0.00 $9,034.00 AGUILAR, ERIK DISTRICT REPRESENTATIVE Senator Nancy Skinner $3,916.00 $0.00 $3,916.00 ALDERETTE, EILEEN OPERATIONS CONSULTANT Operations $6,210.00 $0.00 $6,210.00 ALEMAR, REGINA EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT Rules $5,260.00 $0.00 $5,260.00 ALLEN, JENNIFER CONSULTANT Senate Republican Caucus $8,784.00 $0.00 $8,784.00 ALLEY, AMY PRINCIPAL CONSULTANT/EXEC Senate President Pro Tempore $10,818.00 $0.00 $10,818.00 ALVAREZ, DANIEL RETIRED ANNUITANT Secretary Senate / Desk N/A $0.00 $119/hr. * ALVAREZ, JOSE EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT Senator Ben Hueso $3,624.00 $0.00 $3,624.00 ALVAREZ, ROBERT CHIEF OF STAFF Senator Cathleen Galgiani $11,984.00 $0.00 $11,984.00 ALVIDREZ, TIFFANI CHIEF OF STAFF Senator Holly Mitchell $13,788.00 $0.00 $13,788.00 AMAVISCA, ANDREA OFFICE ASSISTANT Senator Mike McGuire $3,434.00 $0.00 $3,434.00 AMELGA, HELEN DISTRICT REPRESENTATIVE Senator Holly Mitchell $4,114.00 $0.00 $4,114.00 AMES, ASHLEY PRINCIPAL CONSULTANT Appropriations $8,388.00 $0.00 $8,388.00 ANAS, NICHOLAS DISTRICT COORDINATOR Senator Thomas J. -
CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS: CALIFORNIA Information As of 07.19.21
CLOROX DIRECT CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS: CALIFORNIA Information as of 07.19.21. For latest information, please visit: https://cal- access.sos.ca.gov/Campaign/Committees/Detail.aspx?id=1008771&view=contributions&session=2019 PAYMENT DATE PAYEE CONTEST POSITION AMOUNT TYPE 10/30/2020 OAKPAC SUPPORT MONETARY $10,000.00 CRISTINA GARCIA FOR STATE ASSEMBLY 06/06/2019 SUPPORT MONETARY $2,500.00 ASSEMBLY 2020 PERSON 058 WALDRON FOR STATE ASSEMBLY 02/13/2019 SUPPORT MONETARY $2,000.00 ASSEMBLY 2020 PERSON 075 ROB BONTA FOR STATE ASSEMBLY 02/27/2019 SUPPORT MONETARY $2,000.00 ASSEMBLY 2020 PERSON 018 DEVON MATHIS FOR STATE ASSEMBLY 03/07/2019 SUPPORT MONETARY $2,000.00 ASSEMBLY 2020 PERSON 026 JIM WOOD FOR STATE ASSEMBLY 05/07/2019 SUPPORT MONETARY $2,000.00 ASSEMBLY 2020 PERSON 002 SHANNON GROVE FOR STATE SENATOR 06/06/2019 SUPPORT MONETARY $2,000.00 SENATE 2022 016 EDUARDO GARCIA FOR STATE ASSEMBLY 06/19/2019 SUPPORT MONETARY $2,000.00 ASSEMBLY 2020 PERSON 056 JEFF STONE FOR STATE SENATOR 07/11/2019 SUPPORT MONETARY $2,000.00 STATE SENATE 2022 028 NANCY SKINNER FOR STATE SENATOR 08/27/2019 SUPPORT MONETARY $2,000.00 SENATE 2020 009 DEVON MATHIS FOR STATE ASSEMBLY 08/27/2019 SUPPORT MONETARY $2,000.00 ASSEMBLY 2020 PERSON 026 01/16/2019 OAKPAC SUPPORT MONETARY $1,500.00 BRIAN DAHLE FOR STATE ASSEMBLY 02/13/2019 SUPPORT MONETARY $1,500.00 SENATE 2019 PERSON 001 MELISSA MELENDEZ STATE ASSEMBLY 02/27/2019 SUPPORT MONETARY $1,500.00 FOR ASSEMBLY 2020 PERSON 067 ANDREAS BORGEAS STATE SENATOR 02/27/2019 SUPPORT MONETARY $1,500.00 FOR SENATE 2022 008 BUFFY WICKS FOR STATE ASSEMBLY 03/07/2019 SUPPORT MONETARY $1,500.00 ASSEMBLY 2020 PERSON 015 SENATOR BOB STATE SENATOR 03/07/2019 WIECKOWSKI 2018- SUPPORT MONETARY $1,500.00 010 2020 OFFICE HOLDER NANCY SKINNER FOR STATE SENATOR 04/11/2019 SUPPORT MONETARY $1,500.00 SENATE 2020 009 BILL DODD FOR STATE SENATOR 04/29/2019 SUPPORT MONETARY $1,500.00 SENATE 2020 003 BILL QUIRK FOR STATE ASSEMBLY 05/07/2019 SUPPORT MONETARY $1,500.00 ASSEMBLY 2020 PERSON 020 MGEN RICHARD D.