Mislabeling of Commercial Atlantic Cod (Gadus Morhua) Products in Spain Joshua Helgoe University of South Carolina

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Mislabeling of Commercial Atlantic Cod (Gadus Morhua) Products in Spain Joshua Helgoe University of South Carolina University of South Carolina Scholar Commons Theses and Dissertations 2016 Mislabeling Of Commercial Atlantic Cod (Gadus Morhua) Products In Spain Joshua Helgoe University of South Carolina Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd Part of the Marine Biology Commons, and the Other Life Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Helgoe, J.(2016). Mislabeling Of Commercial Atlantic Cod (Gadus Morhua) Products In Spain. (Master's thesis). Retrieved from https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd/3828 This Open Access Thesis is brought to you by Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MISLABELING OF COMMERCIAL ATLANTIC COD (GADUS MORHUA) PRODUCTS IN SPAIN by Joshua Helgoe Bachelor of Science University of South Carolina, 2015 Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Master of Science in Marine Science College of Arts and Sciences University of South Carolina 2016 Accepted by: Joseph Quattro, Director of Thesis David Wethey, Reader Joe Jones, Reader Lacy Ford, Senior Vice Provost and Dean of Graduate Studies © Copyright by Joshua Helgoe, 2016 All Rights Reserved ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to acknowledge everybody in Dr. Quattro’s lab who helped me throughout this entire project including Mark Roberts, Katrina Hounchell, Kate Levasseur, Emma De Neff, Justin Lewandowsky, and Muhammed Alqatani. I would like to acknowledge the Walker Institute and the Magellan Scholar Program for their generous funding of this project. iii ABSTRACT The mislabeling of commercial fish products is a pervasive, worldwide problem. Most consumers of seafood are unaware this issue directly affects them and can even have negative impacts on their health. Mislabeling occurs when a product’s label is inconsistent with its content. Although mislabeling can be unintentional, deliberate mislabeling is a more common trend to increase profits and/or bypass fishing regulations - a form of economic fraud. Unfortunately, oversight, enforcement, and research are vastly insufficient in relation to the global scale of the problem. In order to add to the small knowledge base on European mislabeling rates, determine if overfished or harmful species have been sold, spread consumer awareness, and hold the industry accountable, tissue samples from everyday commercial products and restaurant servings labeled as Atlantic cod (bacalao in Spanish) were confirmed as containing cod via DNA sequence- based ‘barcoding’. Atlantic cod samples (n=546) were collected and characterized genetically from supermarkets, markets, and restaurants from eight cities (Madrid, Salamanca, Santiago de Compostela, Bilbao, Barcelona, Valencia, Granada, and Seville) throughout Spain. The DNA barcoding process used a universal PCR-based assay of the mitochondrial Cytochrome Oxidase-I (COI) and 16s locus using standard primer sequences and PCR conditions that are part of the Fish Barcode of Life initiative. Results indicate a 6.4% mislabeling rate (35/546) with no real statistical evidence of distinct geographic patterns of mislabeling. Common ling (Molva molva), haddock iv (Melanogrammus aeglefinus), saithe (Pollachius virens), and Alaskan pollock (Gadus chalocogrammus) were the most common substitutes, while Nile perch (Lates niloticus) and Vietnamese catfish (Pangasianodon hypopthalmus) were the most taxonomically dissimilar substitutes. These results are compared to other similar studies assaying fish products in the European Union and elsewhere. v TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................ iii Abstract .............................................................................................................................. iv List of tables ..................................................................................................................... viii List of figures ..................................................................................................................... ix Chapter 1: Background ........................................................................................................1 1.1 DNA Barcoding ...................................................................................................3 1.2 Related Mislabeling Research ..............................................................................5 1.3 Threat to Public Health ........................................................................................8 1.4 IUU Fishing ........................................................................................................10 1.5 Economic Cost of Mislabeling ...........................................................................11 1.6 Disguising Mislabeled Fish ................................................................................13 1.7 Labeling Regulations ..........................................................................................15 1.8 Spain and Cod ....................................................................................................16 Chapter 2: Hypotheses .......................................................................................................20 2.1 Expected Trends in Mislabeling .........................................................................20 2.2 Expected Substitutions .......................................................................................20 Chapter 3: Materials and methods .....................................................................................21 3.1 Sample Collection ..............................................................................................21 3.2 DNA Isolation and Sequencing ..........................................................................29 vi 3.3 DNA Barcoding ..................................................................................................31 3.4 Retesting with 16s ..............................................................................................32 3.5 Geographic Analysis ..........................................................................................33 Chapter 4: Results ..............................................................................................................34 4.1 Mislabeling by City ............................................................................................34 4.2 Mislabeling by Product Type .............................................................................35 4.3 Mislabeling by Location Purchased ...................................................................40 4.4 Substituted Species Relatedness .........................................................................41 4.5 Mislabeled Sample Data .....................................................................................43 Chapter 5: Discussion ........................................................................................................47 5.1 Characteristics of Spanish Cod Mislabeling ......................................................48 5.2 Substituted Species .............................................................................................51 5.3 Geographic Analysis ..........................................................................................53 5.4 Who is at Fault? ..................................................................................................53 5.5 Broader Context .................................................................................................54 Chapter 6: Conclusion........................................................................................................56 References ..........................................................................................................................59 Appendix A: Complete Sample Data .................................................................................69 vii LIST OF TABLES Table 3.1 Samples collected by city ..................................................................................22 Table 3.2 Samples collected by location purchased ..........................................................23 Table 3.3 Samples collected by product type ....................................................................24 Table 4.1 City summary data .............................................................................................34 Table 4.2 Product type summary data................................................................................35 Table 4.3 Samples sequenced by product type for each city .............................................37 Table 4.4 Samples mislabeled by product type for each city ............................................37 Table 4.5 Mislabeling rate by product type for each city ..................................................38 Table 4.6 Location of purchase summary data ..................................................................40 Table 4.7 Samples sequenced by location of purchase for each city .................................40 Table 4.8 Samples mislabeled by location of purchase for each city ................................41 Table 4.9 Mislabeling rate by location of purchase for each city ......................................41 Table 4.10 Relatedness of substituted species ...................................................................42 Table 4.11
Recommended publications
  • REPORT on the NORWEGIAN FROZEN FISH FILLET Industryl/ by R
    August 1953 Washington 25, D.C. Vol. I 5 , No.8 : REPORT ON THE NORWEGIAN FROZEN FISH FILLET INDUSTRyl/ By R. T. Wh i teleather* FILLETING INDUSTRY IN GENERAL The fisheries that support the groundfish fillet industry in Norway are lo­ cated in the northern part of the country principally from the Lofot Islands area northward to Hammerfest in Finnmark. These fisheries, particularly those for cod, are generally ranked among the most prolific in the world. In a normal year the Lofot fisheries alone from January through March yield from 80,000 to 120,000 met­ ric tons of large cod. Notwi t hst anding this, the 1953 spring fishery for cod was disastrous owing to violent storms and almost continuous bad weather for the two- onth period which comprised most of the season. No trawlers operate in t he Lofot cod fishery. The purse seiners, gill netters, ong liner., and hand liners used are dependent to a great extent on reasonably air weather conditions. As a result of the curtailed fishing because of the poor weather during the 1953 ( orwegian Landings of p-r1nc-ipal Species Used in Fillet season, the landings of Industry. 1948- 52 headed and gutted cod asof Species 19521/ 11951 19501194911948 March 30 amounted to only '. Thousands of r.~etric Tons) about 25,000 tons, one of octY (headed and gutted ) . 218 1 249 1961176\ 179 the poorest showings during addock •••••.••• do . ..... 22 18 18 21 25 the past 50 years. Since cean catfish ••• do. ..... 5 6 5 3 1 }'larch is usually considered )cean perch (round) •.
    [Show full text]
  • Cod Fact Sheet
    R FACT SHEET Cod (Gadus morhua) Image taken from (Cohen et al. 1990) Introduction Cod (Gadus morhua) is generally considered a demersal fish although its habitat may become pelagic under certain hydrographic conditions, when feeding or spawning. It is widely distributed throughout the north Atlantic and Arctic regions in a variety of habitats from shoreline to continental shelf, in depths to 600m (Cohen et al. 1990). The Irish Sea stock spawns at two main sites in the western and eastern Irish Sea during February to April (Armstrong et al. 2011). Historically the stock has been commercially important, however in the last decade a decline in SSB and reduced productivity of the stock have led to reduce landings. Reviewed distribution map for Gadus morhua (Atlantic cod), with modelled year 2100 native range map based on IPCC A2 emissions scenario. www.aquamaps.org, version of Aug. 2013. Web. Accessed 28 Jan. 2011 Life history overview Adults are usually found in deeper, colder waters. During the day they form schools and swim about 30-80 m above the bottom, dispersing at night to feed (Cohen et al. 1990; ICES 2005). They are omnivorous; feeding at dawn or dusk on invertebrates and fish, including their own young (Cohen et al. 1990). Adults migrate between spawning, feeding and overwintering areas, mostly within the boundaries of the respective stocks. Large migrations are rare occurrences, although there is evidence for limited seasonal migrations into neighbouring regions, most Irish Sea fish will stay within their management area (ICES 2012). Historical tagging studies indicated spawning site fidelity but with varying degrees of mixing of cod between the Irish Sea, Celtic Sea and west of Scotland/north of Ireland (ICES 2015).
    [Show full text]
  • BONY FISHES 602 Bony Fishes
    click for previous page BONY FISHES 602 Bony Fishes GENERAL REMARKS by K.E. Carpenter, Old Dominion University, Virginia, USA ony fishes constitute the bulk, by far, of both the diversity and total landings of marine organisms encoun- Btered in fisheries of the Western Central Atlantic.They are found in all macrofaunal marine and estuarine habitats and exhibit a lavish array of adaptations to these environments. This extreme diversity of form and taxa presents an exceptional challenge for identification. There are 30 orders and 269 families of bony fishes presented in this guide, representing all families known from the area. Each order and family presents a unique suite of taxonomic problems and relevant characters. The purpose of this preliminary section on technical terms and guide to orders and families is to serve as an introduction and initial identification guide to this taxonomic diversity. It should also serve as a general reference for those features most commonly used in identification of bony fishes throughout the remaining volumes. However, I cannot begin to introduce the many facets of fish biology relevant to understanding the diversity of fishes in a few pages. For this, the reader is directed to one of the several general texts on fish biology such as the ones by Bond (1996), Moyle and Cech (1996), and Helfman et al.(1997) listed below. A general introduction to the fisheries of bony fishes in this region is given in the introduction to these volumes. Taxonomic details relevant to a specific family are explained under each of the appropriate family sections. The classification of bony fishes continues to transform as our knowledge of their evolutionary relationships improves.
    [Show full text]
  • Do Some Atlantic Bluefin Tuna Skip Spawning?
    SCRS/2006/088 Col. Vol. Sci. Pap. ICCAT, 60(4): 1141-1153 (2007) DO SOME ATLANTIC BLUEFIN TUNA SKIP SPAWNING? David H. Secor1 SUMMARY During the spawning season for Atlantic bluefin tuna, some adults occur outside known spawning centers, suggesting either unknown spawning regions, or fundamental errors in our current understanding of bluefin tuna reproductive schedules. Based upon recent scientific perspectives, skipped spawning (delayed maturation and non-annual spawning) is possibly prevalent in moderately long-lived marine species like bluefin tuna. In principle, skipped spawning represents a trade-off between current and future reproduction. By foregoing reproduction, an individual can incur survival and growth benefits that accrue in deferred reproduction. Across a range of species, skipped reproduction was positively correlated with longevity, but for non-sturgeon species, adults spawned at intervals at least once every two years. A range of types of skipped spawning (constant, younger, older, event skipping; and delays in first maturation) was modeled for the western Atlantic bluefin tuna population to test for their effects on the egg-production-per-recruit biological reference point (stipulated at 20% and 40%). With the exception of extreme delays in maturation, skipped spawning had relatively small effect in depressing fishing mortality (F) threshold values. This was particularly true in comparison to scenarios of a juvenile fishery (ages 4-7), which substantially depressed threshold F values. Indeed, recent F estimates for 1990-2002 western Atlantic bluefin tuna stock assessments were in excess of threshold F values when juvenile size classes were exploited. If western bluefin tuna are currently maturing at an older age than is currently assessed (i.e., 10 v.
    [Show full text]
  • CHECKLIST and BIOGEOGRAPHY of FISHES from GUADALUPE ISLAND, WESTERN MEXICO Héctor Reyes-Bonilla, Arturo Ayala-Bocos, Luis E
    ReyeS-BONIllA eT Al: CheCklIST AND BIOgeOgRAphy Of fISheS fROm gUADAlUpe ISlAND CalCOfI Rep., Vol. 51, 2010 CHECKLIST AND BIOGEOGRAPHY OF FISHES FROM GUADALUPE ISLAND, WESTERN MEXICO Héctor REyES-BONILLA, Arturo AyALA-BOCOS, LUIS E. Calderon-AGUILERA SAúL GONzáLEz-Romero, ISRAEL SáNCHEz-ALCántara Centro de Investigación Científica y de Educación Superior de Ensenada AND MARIANA Walther MENDOzA Carretera Tijuana - Ensenada # 3918, zona Playitas, C.P. 22860 Universidad Autónoma de Baja California Sur Ensenada, B.C., México Departamento de Biología Marina Tel: +52 646 1750500, ext. 25257; Fax: +52 646 Apartado postal 19-B, CP 23080 [email protected] La Paz, B.C.S., México. Tel: (612) 123-8800, ext. 4160; Fax: (612) 123-8819 NADIA C. Olivares-BAñUELOS [email protected] Reserva de la Biosfera Isla Guadalupe Comisión Nacional de áreas Naturales Protegidas yULIANA R. BEDOLLA-GUzMáN AND Avenida del Puerto 375, local 30 Arturo RAMíREz-VALDEz Fraccionamiento Playas de Ensenada, C.P. 22880 Universidad Autónoma de Baja California Ensenada, B.C., México Facultad de Ciencias Marinas, Instituto de Investigaciones Oceanológicas Universidad Autónoma de Baja California, Carr. Tijuana-Ensenada km. 107, Apartado postal 453, C.P. 22890 Ensenada, B.C., México ABSTRACT recognized the biological and ecological significance of Guadalupe Island, off Baja California, México, is Guadalupe Island, and declared it a Biosphere Reserve an important fishing area which also harbors high (SEMARNAT 2005). marine biodiversity. Based on field data, literature Guadalupe Island is isolated, far away from the main- reviews, and scientific collection records, we pres- land and has limited logistic facilities to conduct scien- ent a comprehensive checklist of the local fish fauna, tific studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Total Mercury and Copper Concentrations in Lake Trout and Whitefish Fillets from Lake Superior
    Total Mercury and Copper Concentrations in Lake Trout and Whitefish Fillets From Lake Superior Activity: 19 -23 By Kory Groetsch Environmental Section Biological Services Division INTRODUCTION Mercury and copper are the two most toxic heavy metals to fish. Furthermore, methyl mercury can accumulate in fish muscle tissue to levels that, consumed on a regular basis, may pose a risk to human health. Both of these metals are released during copper mining and ore processing. Copper mining and processing were a major industry in the Keweenaw Peninsula of Michigan during the mid-1800's. Mining processes which involved heating the ore, released mercury as a bi-product into the air. Furthermore, the unused portion of the ore after the desired minerals were removed (i.e. tailings) were dumped off the shoals of the Keweenaw Peninsula into Lake Superior. These tailing have formed large sholes referred to as stamp sands. Because the extraction of copper from the ore is not a 100% efficient process, it is reasonable to assume that copper, as well as mercury, were in the tailings released into the waters around the Keweenaw Peninsula. The waters around the Keweenaw Peninsula are the location of several lake trout and whitefish spawning reefs. The lake trout and whitefish populations around the Keweenaw Peninsula are sustained by the fish reproduction that occurs on these reefs. These lake trout and whitefish populations have significant cultural and economic importance to the Anishinabe. The purpose of this study was to determine the total mercury and total copper concentrations in the muscle tissue (i.e. fillet) of lake trout and whitefish, in size ranges commonly caught by tribal fishermen around the Keweenaw Penisula.
    [Show full text]
  • Pacific Cod (Gadus Macrocephalus) in Puget Sound and Adjacent Waters: Biology and Stock Assessment
    State of Washington Department of Fisheries PACIFIC COD (GADUS MACROCEPHALUS) IN PUGET SOUND AND ADJACENT WATERS: BIOLOGY AND STOCK ASSESSMENT BY WAYNE A. PALSSON FISH BIOLOGIST DECEMBER 1990 Technical Report Number: 112 State of Washington DEPARTMENT OF FISHERIES TECHNICAL REPORT NO. 112 Pacific Cod (Gadus macrocephalus) in Puget Sound and Adjacent Waters: Biology and Stock Assessment by Wayne A. Palsson Fish Biologist Booth Gardner Governor December 1990 ABSTRACT A stock assessment of Pacific cod was undertaken for Puget Sound. The biology of Pacific cod was reviewed to provide insights into stock structure and population dynamics. Tagging data for Puget Sound revealed that three stocks exist: a stock in the Gulf-Bellingham and San Juan Island Regions, a stock in the Strait of Juan de Fuca and Port Townsend Bay, and a stock south of Admiralty Inlet. Catch data showed that periods of high catches alternate with periods of low catches. Six of these cycles were observed since 1942 with a peak catch of 3.5 million pounds in 1980. Catches in recent years have been below the last ten-year average of 2.5 million pounds per year. Catch patterns differed among regions. The Gulf-Bellingham Management Region typically produced over half of the catch of Pacific cod during a year. Catch rates from trawl and recreational fisheries were used as an index of abundance to assess stock condition. Catch rates in most regions and fisheries were lower in the 1980s than in the 1970s, but catch rates have been stable until 1990 in the Gulf­ Bellingham Region. Catch rates for fisheries in the eastern portion of the western stock have declined, especially for the Port Townsend area.
    [Show full text]
  • The Landing Obligation and Its Implications on the Control of Fisheries
    DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR INTERNAL POLICIES POLICY DEPARTMENT B: STRUCTURAL AND COHESION POLICIES FISHERIES THE LANDING OBLIGATION AND ITS IMPLICATIONS ON THE CONTROL OF FISHERIES STUDY This document was requested by the European Parliament's Committee on Fisheries. AUTHORS Ocean Governance Consulting: Christopher Hedley Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science: Tom Catchpole, Ana Ribeiro Santos RESPONSIBLE ADMINISTRATOR Marcus Breuer Policy Department B: Structural and Cohesion Policies European Parliament B-1047 Brussels E-mail: [email protected] EDITORIAL ASSISTANCE Adrienn Borka Lyna Pärt LINGUISTIC VERSIONS Original: EN ABOUT THE PUBLISHER To contact the Policy Department or to subscribe to its monthly newsletter please write to: [email protected] Manuscript completed in September 2015. © European Union, 2015. Print ISBN 978-92-823-7938-7 doi:10.2861/694624 QA-02-15-709-EN-C PDF ISBN 978-92-823-7939-4 doi:10.2861/303902 QA-02-15-709-EN-N This document is available on the Internet at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/studies DISCLAIMER The opinions expressed in this document are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily represent the official position of the European Parliament. Reproduction and translation for non-commercial purposes are authorized, provided the source is acknowledged and the publisher is given prior notice and sent a copy. DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR INTERNAL POLICIES POLICY DEPARTMENT B: STRUCTURAL AND COHESION POLICIES FISHERIES THE LANDING OBLIGATION AND ITS IMPLICATIONS ON THE CONTROL OF FISHERIES STUDY Abstract This study reviews the impacts of the new Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) rules requiring catches in regulated fisheries to be landed and counted against quotas of each Member State ("the landing obligation and requiring that catch of species subject to the landing obligation below a minimum conservation reference size be restricted to purposes other than direct human consumption.
    [Show full text]
  • Histological Aspects of the Early Development of the Digestive System of Burbot Lota Lota L
    ISSN 0015-5497, e-ISSN 1734-9168 Folia Biologica (Kraków), vol. 64 (2016), No 1 Ó Institute of Systematics and Evolution of Animals, PAS, Kraków, 2015 doi:10.3409/fb64_1.11 Histological Aspects of the Early Development of the Digestive System of Burbot Lota lota L. (Lotidae, Gadiformes)* Gra¿yna FURGA£A-SELEZNIOW, Ma³gorzata JANKUN, Roman KUJAWA, Joanna NOWOSAD, Maria BI£AS, Dariusz KUCHARCZYK, and Andrzej SKRZYPCZAK Accepted December 04, 2015 Published January 29, 2016 FURGA£A-SELEZNIOW G., JANKUN M., KUJAWA R., NOWOSAD J., BI£AS M., KUCHARCZYK D., SKRZYPCZAK A. 2016. Histological aspects of the early development of the digestive system of burbot Lota lota L. (Lotidae, Gadiformes). Folia Biologica (Kraków) 64: 11-21. The ontogeny of the digestive tract was studied histologically in burbot, Lota lota L., from hatching to 42 days post-hatch (dph). At hatching, the digestive tract consisted of a straight tube with discernible digestive accessory glands (the liver and the pancreas) dorsally attached to the yolk sac. Most of the yolk sac reserves were consumed during the first 12 days and were completely depleted by 17 dph. The first PAS-positive goblet cells appeared at 6 dph, dispersed within the epithelium of the oesophagus and increasing substantially in number and distribution as development progressed. At 12 dph, the first vacuoles (neutral lipids) appeared in the intestine, indicating the functional absorption of nutrients from food. Differentiation of gastric glands was first noticed at 17 dph and was extensive by 27 dph. L. lota larvae have a morphologically complete digestive tract by 32 dph.
    [Show full text]
  • Secondary Sexual Characteristics in Codfishes ([[Gadidae]]) in Relation to Sound Production, Habitat Use, and Social Behaviour
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) Secondary sexual characteristics in codfishes ([[Gadidae]]) in relation to sound production, habitat use, and social behaviour Skjaeraasen, J.E., Meager, J.J. and Heino, M. IIASA Interim Report 2012 Skjaeraasen, J.E., Meager, J.J. and Heino, M. (2012) Secondary sexual characteristics in codfishes ([[Gadidae]]) in relation to sound production, habitat use, and social behaviour. IIASA Interim Report. IR-12-071 Copyright © 2012 by the author(s). http://pure.iiasa.ac.at/10208/ Interim Report on work of the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis receive only limited review. Views or opinions expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of the Institute, its National Member Organizations, or other organizations supporting the work. All rights reserved. Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage. All copies must bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. For other purposes, to republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, permission must be sought by contacting [email protected] International Institute for Tel: +43 2236 807 342 Applied Systems Analysis Fax: +43 2236 71313 Schlossplatz 1 E-mail: [email protected] A-2361 Laxenburg, Austria Web: www.iiasa.ac.at Interim Report IR-12-071 Secondary sexual characteristics in codfishes (Gadidae) in relation to sound production, habitat use, and social behaviour Jon Egil Skjæraasen Justin J.
    [Show full text]
  • Diet Composition of Cod (Gadus Morhua): Small-Scale Differences in a Sub-Arctic Fjord
    Diet composition of cod (Gadus morhua): small-scale differences in a sub-arctic fjord Enoksen, Siri Elise BI309F MSc IN MARINE ECOLOGY Faculty for Biosciences and Aquaculture May 2015 Acknowledgements The presented thesis is the final part of a two-year Master of Science program at the Faculty of Biosciences and Aquaculture, University of Nordland, Bodø, Norway. I owe my supervisor Associate Professor Henning Reiss eternal gratitude for his patience and all the help with sampling, species determination and writing of this thesis. Without his expertise and guidance, this master thesis would not have been possible. A special thanks to Bjørn Tore Zahl at Saltstraumen Brygge, Geir Jøran Nyheim at Saltstraumen camping, Lill-Anita Stenersen at Kafe Kjelen, Fauske Båtforening and Saltdal Båtforening for helping during sampling, Coop Extra Bygg Fauske for sponsoring sheds for collecting stations, and to all anglers who handed inn samples. This project would not have been possible without their help. I would like to thank Professor Truls Moum, Martina Kopp, Vigdis Edvardsen, Tor Erik Jørgensen and Teshome Tilahun Bizuayehu for help and guidance during DNA barcoding analysis. I thank Nina Tande Hansen and Bibbi Myrvoll at Karrieresenteret Indre Salten for believing in me and convincing me that I was capable of studying at university level. This thesis would not have been possible without their guidance. I would also like to thank my family for their patience during the five years of fulfilling my Master. i Table of contents Acknowledgements .........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Scenario Calculations of Mercury Exposure
    VKM Report 2019:3 Scenario calculations of mercury exposure from fish and overview of species with high mercury concentrations Opinion of the Panel on Contaminants of the Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food and Environment Report from the Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food and Environment (VKM) 2019:3 Scenario calculations of mercury exposure from fish and overview of species with high mercury concentrations Opinion of the Panel on Contaminants of the Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food and Environment 05.04.2019 ISBN: 978-82-8259-319-9 ISSN: 2535-4019 Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food and Environment (VKM) Po 4404 Nydalen N – 0403 Oslo Norway Phone: +47 21 62 28 00 Email: [email protected] vkm.no vkm.no/english Cover photo: Colourbox Suggested citation: VKM, Heidi Amlund, Kirsten Eline Rakkestad, Anders Ruus, Jostein Starrfelt, Jonny Beyer, Anne Lise Brantsæter, Sara Bremer, Gunnar Sundstøl Eriksen, Espen Mariussen, Ingunn Anita Samdal, Cathrine Thomsen and Helle Katrine Knutsen (2019). Scenario calculations of mercury exposure from fish and overview of species with high mercury concentrations. Opinion of the Panel on Contaminants of the Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food and Environment. VKM report 2019:3, ISBN: 978-82-8259-319-9, ISSN: 2535-4019. Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food and Environment (VKM), Oslo, Norway. Scenario calculations of mercury exposure from fish and overview of species with high mercury concentrations Preparation of the opinion The Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food and Environment (Vitenskapskomiteen for mat og miljø, VKM) appointed a project group to answer the request from the Norwegian Food Safety Authority. The project group consisted of three VKM-members, and three employees, including a project leader, from the VKM secretariat.
    [Show full text]