300 King Street, Whitby, Ontario

LACAC Heritage Whitby Committee Meeting Agenda January 12, 2016 – 7:00 PM Committee Room Two Whitby Municipal Building

Page

1. Appointment of Chair and Vice-Chair

2. Disclosures of Interest

3. Approval of Previous Minutes

3.1 Minutes - November 10, 2015 2 - 5

Recommendation: That the LACAC Heritage Whitby minutes of November 10, 2015 be approved.

4. Presentations/Deputations

5. General Business and Reports

5.1 91-99 Baldwin Street Redevelopment Proposal 6 - 60

5.2 Spencer Community Centre Update

6. Correspondence

6.1 Letter from the Office of the Town Clerk 61 - 80 Re: By-law to Designate R.A. Sennett Building, 300 King Street

6.2 Community Heritage Ontario Newsletter - Winter 2016 81 - 92

7. Council Update

8. Other Business

9. Next Meeting

9.1 Tuesday, February 9, 2016 - 7:00 p.m. Committee Room 2, Whitby Municipal Building

10. Adjournment

Page 1 of 92 Agenda Item # 3.1

LACAC Heritage Whitby Committee Minutes November 10, 2015 -7:00 pm Committee Room Two Whitby Municipal Building

Present: Margaret Clayton John Ecker Rita Edgell Joyce Marshall Rick McDonnell Vincent Santamaura Brian Winter Councillor Roy

Also Present: Sarah Ferencz, Library Archivist Stephen Ashton, Staff Liaison, Planner II, Sustainability and Community Development Jonathan Gilston, Committee Secretary

Regrets: Lynn Collins Gregory Fiet Katherine Hull Heather Kearney

1. Disclosures of Interest

1.1 There were no disclosures of interest.

2. Approval of Previous Minutes

2.1 Minutes - October 20, 2015

Recommendation:

Moved By Vincent Santamaura

That the LACAC Heritage Whitby Committee minutes of October 20, 2015 be approved.

Page 2 of 92 Agenda Item # 3.1

LACAC Heritage Whitby Committee Minutes November 10, 2015 - 7:00 PM

Carried

3. Presentations/Deputations

3.1 There were no presentations or deputations.

4. General Business and Reports

4.1 2016 Community Events Discussion ensued regarding:  the 2016 Town events the Committee will participate in;  developing a display theme and incorporating a model for the Committee's booth, such as Camp X, the Whitby Psychiatric Hospital, Lynde House or the R.A. Sennett Building;  encouraging member participation at Committee booths and incorporating event participation in the Terms of Reference; and  using social media platforms, such as Twitter, to promote community events and LACAC. It was the consensus of the Committee to revisit this topic at the next scheduled meeting on January 12, 2016.

4.2 December Social Evening Discussion ensued regarding the details of the Committee's social evening in December.

4.3 Spencer Community Centre Update Margaret Clayton advised that she has been undertaking research into whether the Spencer Community Centre site was the location of a previous school.

5. Correspondence

5.1 Community Heritage Ontario (CHO) Fall 2015 Newsletter Stephen Ashton distributed copies of the Fall 2015 newsletter to the Committee for information.

5.2 CHOnews Bulletin - Request for Articles Stephen Ashton distributed copies of the bulletin to the Committee for information.

Page 3 of 92 Agenda Item # 3.1

LACAC Heritage Whitby Committee Minutes November 10, 2015 - 7:00 PM

6. Council Update

6.1 Councillor Roy presented letters to Margaret Clayton from Mayor Don Mitchell and Oshawa Mayor John Henry in appreciation for her work and civic engagement.

She also provided an update regarding:  the Port Whitby Secondary Plan, with public feedback received during the November 9, 2015 Planning and Development Committee meeting;  developing a banner program that honours veterans, similar to programs in Uxbridge and Port Perry;  the West Whitby plans of subdivision;  the creation and advertisement of the Active Transportation and Safe Roads Advisory Committee;  the 2016 budget process; and  a progress report on ash tree removals, and examining ways to accelerate the process. 7. Other Business

7.1 Stephen Ashton provided information regarding the Province of Ontario's review of the Aggregate Resources Act.

7.2 Margaret Clayton provided information regarding the Port Whitby Community Improvement Plan and Secondary Plan updates.

Discussion ensued regarding:  the ideas and options to maintain the look and character of a street, either restoring an existing structure or building a new one with a similar design;  the development of the South Whitby area, including the area on Byron Street South and Victoria Street West;  the northward extension of Harbour Street to Victoria Street East; and  the street widening of Brock Street South south of Victoria Street West.

Margaret Clayton advised that she will distribute the information to the Committee, and advised that comments are to be submitted by the end of November.

7.3 Sarah Ferencz provided an update regarding:

Page 4 of 92 Agenda Item # 3.1

LACAC Heritage Whitby Committee Minutes November 10, 2015 - 7:00 PM

 the student's assignments in January;  retrieving material from the Archives of Ontario that was originally donated by the Town of Whitby; and  the Ontario Cultural Strategy roundtable discussion scheduled for November 16, 2015 at the Whitby Central Library.

7.4 Brian Winter advised that 2016 will have several significant anniversaries, including:  the 150th anniversary of All Saints Church;  the 150th anniversary of the Ontario Regiment;  the 75th anniversary of the Camp X opening; and  the 50th anniversary of the Whitby Yacht Club founding.

He also advised that the Lynde House museum will open to the public on November 28, 2015, with a private ceremony on November 24.

8. Next Meeting

8.1 Tuesday January 12, 2016 - 7:00 p.m. Committee Room 2, Whitby Municipal Building

9. Adjournment

9.1 Motion to Adjourn

Recommendation:

Moved By Rick McDonnell

That the meeting adjourn.

Carried

The meeting ended at 8:46 p.m.

J. Gilston, Committee Secretary Margaret Clayton, Committee Chair

Page 5 of 92 _u_m::_:mUm_om:=5_,: mum_»omm_m:q mamammm? ._.O<<3 O._.. <<:_§. oz :2 N25 _um_.3= 5: momas $8 _._m_.:mmm >_u_o=om:o:_u;z2_3%§_%@§_§.s

_u_.ovm:<_:qo=:m:o: _H_ :a_Qa8mm_ 0: mm.» o3 AW?/k?ac 475.4 w§,n/Z Saute Ummo_.:u:o: 2 <_8B=o: 8 m:__o_:a\_u.on¢& _H_ 292 Oo:m..Eo=o: K Um3o_:_o: us)» 698 m.3nn__om:o:.

/\/19.9.19.n\ ,9nm.nbmz.e.aT. £7. £3. «Wn...~.»..>u.?0.\W1ac/$5.0 7c.F.vr..p>. Jae ?.u+u% 1ws\.r.r.>uPr?o/..)..:J..ur.1/9). wva.?r um/90 r£$+ 63439?,3C.F %on ?fe» o% 9/no . Agenda Item # 5.1 Page 6 of 92

mmsomu>mm>m‘n02 O?l?m cmmO2h< Umnm_~mnm_

Umnm_.~o<.¢<Eu__om:o: zo. >Eo=om:”.m>n_3o<<_mo_mm3m:n

._.Em>ou__om:“Em_.m_o9“ Em“oo:omuEm_gm3“oEm« mun8

_u:_.Em::o_.m.Em >v_u__om:“m_momo_So<<_mqmmmEm.“Ea mEu__om“8:_m8 cmcmmaE“vmwmozm2 98:0 95.8 mm m: muu__om“_o:8“ mIm?mmm_um::_“. E Em mcn__om“_o:.._mc§.mo“_m:&mv__3mm: Em _m:aAmvEm“ .mEm m:_o_.mo“oizm muu__om“_o:.._.:_mmEm__om.“_o:mag m3“ mzmosmamcccoazmn8oc3m:“m“_o:. oo:“mEm E..o3_m.“_o: oo=mo“mamam3mE“mEmQ wumo:_om__<+0..Em uczoommo“ Qmmzzomwmooam2. mmmamsqmq.mzaEm O:“m:.o Im:.8,cm >0“ mmm3m:Qma.m:n_2.: cm53 E Em c_.oommmEmo“ Em mvuzomzoz“Q m _._m:.“mmm_um::=. OcmmzozmamcmaEoE_m oo__mo“_o: m:oc_q cmq:mo“ma 8“ oo==~=.mm“.o=mw9. 3m:=“.:QUmtmlimzn .353 2. _\§“.3S mumm.omm“m=Qmamammmn

>cc__om:“_mm_m:m“Sm” N??xmu

O<<:m_..m >:Eo_.“Nm:o:

: Em mnu__om:.“_m:0“ Em o<<:m“ o“Em _m:qEm.“_mEm mcgmo“o“ E_m mun__om“_o:.Em: <<1:m: m:EozNm.“_o_._ E“Em ossmsmcEo1NEmEm mnv__om:.“8 Emum?mmsm963.“ Em mun__om.“8:3cm.“ Ummsmormg.2 Em o<<:mw 3cm“ oo3n_m.“mEm mcEo1Nm“_o: mm.“oc.“ cm_o<<. _ “Ctr?/ofLn¢.m3 Em ossma 9. Em _m:qEm“ _mEm m:§.mo.“ o“ E_m muv__om.“_o:mag , A» s» cw 8 Emvmxmmammacs...“E_m muU__om“_o:oz :2 cm:m:. 1 W?Eu

_ . $055 Em: Wm.“m.“m3m:.“mEma _ «mEmmm:“m.“_o:9. Em cc?omm 25. - ‘ 9. E_m mvu__om:o:.:m«m_u

>vv__om:“.m Agenda Item # 5.1

m5:m.“c_.m“ Page 7 of 92

. ?mmnm«mo:m_ E8“3m.“_o: o: “ oz: 5 oo__mo“ma Sam“ Em _mmm_m:Eo1.“0“. ._.:m_3.o“3m:o: <5: cmcmmq8: Em vc?ommmo“ mm3E_m.“m1:© Em :m_.:m@mum“3_“mnn__om.“8:mammsmczzmmu_m3u:m.“mmm2_om 9. sozom2 amom?.“Sam“ mmo.“_o: $8; mag mmo- “.0: A28 9. Em O:.“m_._o Im1.“mcm>o.“_ _“<0: :mmmammE2: 5-3 .353: mega. <

‘ ; .. Cup. . . j K...... _.

353.8 won man?ézs 2:.” HE. _.:E:& 3” ‘Vg

>~.nE8o$ Fe. Agenda Item # 5.1

mwz Page 8 of 92 <35; 3 moc.8B¢ob No? $23 Zo. mzam O::E.m_ ?muxwmaEscm?>mm$mE2: 3-3 wmE§.= mesa.<

P: _::.ca:omc= Fe Ua

EN Qi?sm w1:o%m_m Lg waowommzUomoawmos Hm>mmoo5.8mUoo:Bo:$ Ab >:2.§2o Uo<£owBo§ Ocmosm Nb waomasnOésmw 9.532 mzmcwammoz we ?olemma>mm8mEm.: P: as Uoozaaiumcz m._EaawmmoWoma??.F3.:omEo _ Uomwmsmnosm 2. 25.38% Wanoszz?aunos w.u mxwmmsmwaaamAw m.R:o.::.om E zmmmm?oawWoooBBa=mm.:o: _.mm§.&:mEa E?immoH535 on wwO::.dS_ F

WM; 055 3, ?an we Wauo1>=3o~.m=€ was 1:m.8:om_ 22% W5 Emcism >3.2::x T _w¢.=om_.M.EQ

3 wmm?Cmom >3.o=n:xN"?_a:5ao_om%

S; E N 8 E53: m?a? >Eu2::wmuo=a5S:2; S. >::::. WAEoammomxmsdsmaos

WA; >_.oE.8oEB_ WAN O:_nE.m_ Agenda Item # 5.1 Page 9 of 92

9%» <35: 3 m£u8B_uQ.. ~39 wHo._.oo.?Zo. mica m.8o_Q8E8o$ Fa. Ema N O:::_.m_ EawinmaEzum?>mmammE$: 3.3 553.. mg? <

Fe =_._a._=&.:.

H.» Qimmsm332$ mao§§9 :5 FE raw@8353 So Eomoanomm?8. 3 Am8 wmasa$.02. <

1:5 boa 8.0 Sean 5 90 macaw.EowzmmoOosm9.2 5a 8.0 mm::5 3.8 m8 Eor?am 5 ma9.0055 233% Oomm?dmaomU539. 35%Ed 589 on Ea A402: 3. 25% momxmmmWomaah>m3%. m0:53: Enigma bdwmo?>mmmmmBoErum 8 _um_2.%a& 8 mmmomm:5 53% <35 a.mumQammcm_.a§sm@ 25 8392 $5 582 ow:8 32 mo

PM>mmooB.8mUoo?uoim

?aw 5.5% bdwmo?>mmommBoEQ53 rum3% 8:: momma8 :5 mozocidmmoéamsm moocaboimn

- waois?a 3:3 m.B8B9: - H50 Oimao E?imma>2 - H30Usww?d Womwo:o.m.§a Em: ~93 92$ oE._.o=:mmommBo:.amamno59.<§§. Hoés 2. 3:3. NEW

Mb 3.32: 0552. Ooim? §§aa§:

T:owNm 05310 :8 Qo m?oowéo?w 35 WE So 239 E

.H.oE8o$ Ea. Ema w n__:=§_ ?anxmmaE693 >mm8mE2: 3-3 _wmE€m= mag...<

P: mm?Uon:::=:amc=

PH mm» ~=<2:oJ~

3.. mm.”5938

Hwo3.8 WmEom?mon maamm?EmaomE523 mamaAmwmwémwEvoios?sm $.05 osa 5» acwm?cas manna59.9 3. 35% 08% 8 :6 E.8_.mao:o: <<.m.9 Qoommo£32. .25 @363 oo?uamomRim cm930 5.8 23% 55 com:wmmoBEn o

125 E8 mwaon :8 :99 gm omEa Qmm?osmz:33: mama:So:5 ‘mesa 3. means.«roam: mowwmw?mW03 Ea ooBBaa&m_ manscw55% Qoow man5 wammo.ma::5 wmmo?WmEom?omE :5 o1mEm_muom2. 135

39> I >a:m_ wro?ommmwr- 00:53 96». 8E89m Ea. wmmaA 0:::.B_ ?awxmmaH?cmnn>mmmmmEE: 3-3 _waE.€m= 3.8.. ¢

few I >913 wwo?ommmwrN - mE:§9. We _.oE.8o.a go. cmmam O:=:§_ Eainnma533.2 >mm8mE2: 3-8 $.53: mcea.<

...».,_,

w._._.O I >o1m_ EuonommmwwN - mm: Page 13 of 92 Agenda Item # 5.1

»9 HoE8oa En. Ema m O:::§_ ?aleama Ezcmon>mm$mEE: 5-3 wmE§= 932. <<_::.% awscéa. Ounwlo

WEED 1 >33 wro?omamnrw

WEN ma Eosamomaosu

H30mmao?omSum 83% 3, Eco 5.8 gamma mm“

Hum:owHim AP3. Ma.MKmammm85 ?u: omO:mEm_ma om53% 08¢? Womd Em: macaw mam Ea owboa em.3 wanom.WmmdEB. macaw. 132: om¢

.28 7: Wm?ega mm” Page 14 of 92 Agenda Item # 5.1 3 wm?cis mama.Wo: 2:32 So 8m 8:5 coco 3 wm?cin $8: We: 2:359. So Sm ommoo089 25 3 wm?gms m?oorWe: 2:359. So 95 2:8 88 9% H.oE8o.aEa. ummoQ n===:._ E?iamm 553.2 >mmmmmE2: 3.3 $53: mié. <

Sc: 9.. 3.92; Re 9w 2.2 2:: mna?mxs EL»: .383 3.3 2 8m. 3. S 28 cm £3.29 nix .388

‘A »¢~*-»»-av L.ar_& Page 15 of 92 Agenda Item # 5.1

_ Q HoE8o$ Ea. Ema m O::_:.m_ ?auxama5.3: >mm8mB2: 5-3 wmasmz£82. <w@:omEmUomwmsmmosmu

125 Homimmos25 >:9o~.Eom EmismE59305 $202 55% o

25% Ema r/ nmmmjom _zocw._.x_>_.

L. . Ewes Szo

\W \ m‘w\__/<4onmz%>om

Exmo cmm n .u ....u .- omz3>r >mm>moczo>x<

I I I mmoozo>mz moczoz?

:.:::::: mcéxm cmm>zomxm>moczoz? Am.c.o.>.. m mrmzmzd/x

3.3 Hoés om<

3 magi: 982 - aria \ wm:<- w_.oow:: EoammaOosm?dmmod Cain?

3 wmicis mama- 958 I E: <- w_.oow:: Eomxmmo00395.3: 93%

8 $525 $.02 - :Cm8m I Tm: <- waoaa Eoa?mmoOosmoi?mos UWSQ: Page 16 of 92 Agenda Item # 5.1

Wu <35: 3 moéosas. NOE. 50.39 Zo. m:93 m?oow?onr25 HS mwz>H.oE8o.aEa. mmmoc O::E.s_ max»? 5.2.3 >mm8m:.2: 3-3 E._.§= £32. ¢

125 caaammon :5 EowozwN: 3.8 $523 m?oo?oooma?ommobo m?owow Eamona?morom _.a§=m SE» m8:8. 85 m.25 maomowmm?noormomm.3398 ooo m8o.o

.o.._.m._1 733 waaam

?ow ism? %a%8 E53 Wmm203 530 3, Soon ooomsdomob2:: m:EEEB marom9332 Emm?sm.wonon §8§& m?oom.arm9:55 Wm momomowmom:wm?cio mag moBo $.35 Guns... WmHoo?om on wEmaom5.5 magmoaoosomcwRoommoo.So mqo?.

.36 ono m?onow33.5 omEa caasmrammmaoomwosmowP39 QNKE moaomm :5 m_.oEQwowomwmE€E ms“momw3.9 ow?ea §,.-m..o. ion Nmnoaow oowmo:ow:8 E55 wowmrdoomwooma. $9: E.-o..o m?omm Ea boa mamm 3:: 3, «MB ©%-§. .32: 302% SE88 Ea Nm?oaowoowao:owEa _oEEEm 2% £53 E 3%. :5 woo».Wm5.3 <19 $5: mE:m_om.

‘E5 mwomow:5 Szasm oo?wamommEB.oiBm8_

.25 gzasm m822: Sam mmmmEm_m352%.3538. 99%: wowwoo:smog mmm: Eom?:Q~.o¢< Cox“9: : Emorowcoo:58¢ mmm:Wom.BE.mE:G45/Zmmoo 58: on mo2:: mSa

m.C._.> mag, I /Joé w_.m._.w Page 17 of 92 wow:wm?sms >%§.% Agenda Item # 5.1

OW 8E8o.a Fa. mommaS 0:55.»: ?alnama Ezwm?>mm8mEa=» 8-8 waazas mama.¢

8E8o.a Fa. ammoZ O:==_.m_ ?ainmma535$ >mmammEm=n 3-3 wm?ais 3.8.. Sung E:.%=5. Civic Page 19 of 92 Agenda Item # 5.1

3.9 HH I mimmsmZ03: Q55 m_w

8E8o.8 So. wmma5 O::.:.m_ ?auxamm5:25 >mm8mEo=» 8-8 wa%a= $8.. <

Hro mnocbmmeowoosmwmaomms os?w33 88 mOo:=.:.

.,Z.m._.m:m$: w_.m._.o-ma:

_ w new I W88 C?sm Page 20 of 92 Agenda Item # 5.1

_ 0» 8E8o.B Fe. mmmo5 O:=E.m_ ?awxumaSauna.”>mm8m=.9: 3-3 W953: m.:.m2.¢

3 .9: I 5:25 m._...u..H.~I 0855 Eooa wo&.ooBW08:

385.3 magi 5339

055:3 woma855% mggoea Em oo=_.=mBa? 9930 &§& _: x m:cmmocoma _: x A: Soom€5.52 33 E5. meow33. Can 36 mooasm Page 21 of 92 Agenda Item # 5.1

m.H.m.:AI HmcsawwOm?dm w._.m._.rI 25.82 HEB

Nd <03? 3 moEoBcohNoHm. $8.02 Zo. mKama maoowéo?r gm HE mwz>HoE8oa Fa. Ema E 0:H2:.aH Hmalgma HBHE2>mm8m52: 3-8 HwmH.H€H=E82. ¢

w.H.m.H.H

HHS?mr. OB HH5Hamm?oowHH6a€aHHHdmmannamooommHow3025 mHo8 5% H5HHS3oH.\ooHHH=mHm

vi. H.2 1 H

w_H.m.H.w:w..a.=.ooB

HoH:.8oHmHso. HummoHm O:=E.m—?awmmnaH5389>mm$mB$: 3-3 _wmE§: mas:¢<_:3% E..2._&5. 0:319

.25 $8052: mamarumm93¢? WSWEmamsm8 : Won» $5 Sam95%. H»Wm3:53 magi. mammBoaomnosBod: mos? .oom3oBmmammsgmoo..25 o?zsm:05? Wm mE.no§Bm8€ $5.. 236

Eu. H.0 I wmmoBoEWoommmmob3.9 HW I wmm?zoi wom8oB

_ .3.» .mI wmmos?i Csmimrom Page 23 of 92 Agenda Item # 5.1

We 8E8o.HmFa. Ema 3 O==E.»H EawmaamaHavanaNwmmammamsn 3-3 HwuH.H€H=£32. ¢

HHSmHEonE.acm90 HEHH&=m8:3; ow

> oo=o3.8 HuHooHnH.o:EHmHHo:€mHHu > Nx H208 Hwmn?mE.H€mHHmoo

wHu.HH I Huocsmmmos<<.mHH .q..H.m.H.C I E09. m.:do.::.o AQH.o::& Page 24 of 92 Agenda Item # 5.1 vi. H.< 1 m?oaon ¢

Wv 8E8oHm Hbo. Ema H.» O:=_:.m_ Ealnmmmbutane>mmammEE: 3-8 wm?is £32. ¢<=5.% Ezaaa. 0:31..

.25 38:3 aoomowSo oso m?omowwirmsmoosmr?m owNx A3?? wN a00:5 .33, wdzzooamrammmsmw_uo

_ w..9 H.¢< I Woo», HwdmmammumEvzzoommwommmdm- >&a8

???oém Ea 8EmooBQ:208 @530 omm?do? 25. w_=::::B £035 §._ao§. Page 25 of 92 Agenda Item # 5.1

wG._.x 1 2582 I m?oaom w3._.< I ssaos - 9:32 9% <9,9o: G momzoséohNoHm.5302 Zo. m:80 maagénw Em H3 mwzE63808 Fa. wmmazw O:::§_ ?mnxmmmEswm?>mm8m:.2: 3-3 wmwnis mag: <

.28 won» m?owmmamm?oowmamEmomm?oosoamno.

vi. H.N I 3.3: wean:

Koormiommm

w.Hu.H.>> I Qmmmcwsmoo

H.oE8o.aEa. wmmoE n_.==§_ ?olemmmmauve» >mmommB2: 3-3 $.53: 3.8.. ¢ooommoJ\WEEEW

Hro ono m?owowQmummo>ooommoJ\mndomsaoWmm?oaoxwdmag#35 ?_..3 x 933 AB.-S,.o moon2% mEma3&3: omPS5 Gdzv£50 onM88 Cm?d ago. : Wmvi: 9° Nx ASoon @550 oosmsdomonoo<9.am<39 Evzzoommrommmsm2:: moo=o8.8 mmammo moonam? 125 woo».WmEowom39 SEE: mrnom?m.125 mmmwmozoomWmo mom

wibw I QmammoI moammsmmoan:Qdmw?mrukmmob 9%. aoE8o8 Fa. mommano O:::_.m_ ?alemma533.3 >mmmmmE2: 3.8 $53: was? <

w.H.m.~b I Qmammo233 $55 m_o

_ 0% HoE8o$ Fa. wmmaB O:::.§_ :33? Sauna» >mmammE2: 3-3 $.53: mas? $.53 Aw..ocw=5.Dial: up 0==_=.m_ ~=

@0503 maoaomH3 My mummmm»mm:omNo» NA. Oosoommwo:9 umoésmr?Bo¢

Ea wm?momboa 3. 3 85 3. WandEms macaw. 132: ow€39? Wamwosmm§:Eo€m:Q omUE._§B

Q..o~B9._<$5 omNo» B. Oosoommwos9 @253 cm§a_§ wags :5 os?omamEa 535 So oésoam omEa Eowa?ommwsoa:8 032:

WW: wm:om?oa AN,3. 8. M385 Ma. WandEm: maoomm 133: cm€53. Wom3:m_§:Eo:§:.Q omU553

@.o_.Bm.._<3.9: Baboa My 25 mmm»Em; owH2 NA. Oosoommwos9 .3255 So€33”

0858.. m?zzao

385 E .33» $3 arm0.62: 12553 Kooosiow 35 we: wmum 3 O2. 33 12893 Zoooziow Hro?mm<5

Ema» wmmm o:5. 53 1:888 3:2 Umowmo: >Bom émw F3

3... wwm. 3 Z3. 2?: >Eom <88 <

How:@2525: Page 29 of 92 Agenda Item # 5.1

N38 Wmum a Can xv; >58 $3 QumzamWoca?mos 3: CHEERREV How:Om?wdoz

0% <23: 3. mmgoséoh 8 gm.E23 20. m38¢ maowsoé 3% Ca mwz>8E8o8 Fa. Ema B O::E,m_ WolnmmoEscmoa>mmommEo=» 3-8 .353»: E32. <

Sm: mmaw moago $3 >88 <28 ¢<8~ WomdEm: E25» boa 8 N3 3:: 95:3:

AZWG wmmm ~02. 53 mass Wovozmos 9.29. K. Uawvow. Am mag wmam N>:m.zaw 9.22 3. Uamcoa .§Bom Eciou AN

35 wmum S Zo<. :3 Hmgom Ecs?om Wovo?<<.U8.:sm8: AN.3. Ma.M3.mm

Gm wanm G wcso5% Wowoz¢<. Um:.::m8s is W..3533 APS. 8: M3.Ma

Eu. mmam 3 mcso3% 35 W. ?8Bmm m?owwosZ. 12.08% AN.S. Ma:M3.3 woo wmum 3 Doc. 5% wagonZ. arosemm Zowo: $833 LN

.: Wmam 3 Zo< 5.3 Zowos .2633 mass WHwo?mm AN

ZS _So: m?:o 33 mass W 1255mm 338: Z. .E5Emm Am

No.2 wmum K Zo<. awe 338: K. 1255mm >_oxm=mo~.53.5: AM“mymayME.mm

33 GEE NwFso ES Eoxmmmou.Wo?owos <<.::mBQ5585 Aw.S, 8. M3“Ma

:08 D83 .3 29> $3 ¢<::mB 0358: 23% m.§. 0:558: 3. S, Ma.3 Ma

53¢ 9.8: A02. 5%“ <§5.om m.§. O:.Em3: mm:>Hoxm:mo~OEEQB: Am.3. 3 M3.mm Uoam>Em:w O_.s:m8:

53¢ 03:: 3 may 3% mm:>_oxm:ao_.03:38: Em?mmU923 3:0: 8 Uoam >Bm:m 0558: mcmosomaQ83 Uoww Womwsm?AwUo_.oo: Woroo mg? 02:: 3 Uon. 33 mm:>_oxm:ao_.O3:m8: Comm.§:o€ S. Ma.M3,Ma Uoam>Bm:mOasm?os

3%» 9.8: 3 >9. 6% Como 3:02 mEm::o_ >. 133»: AM“mymp.mm dw? 9.8: 3 23%5% m?mmco? >. .335: Womgm?¢<. Woroo AN.mo.E. Ma Uonoos O. Woroo

$83 9.8: No,3? 68 gm? ma09.02%Eco:

G35 DEE .3 ?:o 53 m8a§§ Em?mmUonoméEma: S Page 30 of 92 Agenda Item # 5.1 388 DEE mZo< _3m Em?moU302? Eco: >==o£o :25 002»: S E?mwm DEE HoFbo Ema Wom5mE<<.Wowoo How>=msUosmwmm APMa.Mwrmm Uoaoob O. Woroo W, HoE8o.8 Fa. ummo8 O:H::.sH EaazwmaHausa» >mmmmmEm=» 3-3 wa.§w. mesa.<

U383 H; NH>9 6% >E8:a H3. 6% Hmw>HHmEHuo:mHmm Hmwwage. LN.myM3.Ha HaaH.H.:mH

588% .H. Nu mo?88 H3wm8HHaH. 58$ O?wao Hso. AN.Ma.MK.Ma

5:538 H, HDan. 88 Z05: H.Hoo

?oo«BoH.H\.~HEov~Y

Q:::o_. Og?oa

Human» HAHES $8 126 03%: q.HHoBmmH

W9: wwm 3 OoH.$3 1H.H.o§mm H

Haaw m.mum o.35. $3 .HH..oEmm<«mH8HUHoHnmo:>BHOm«<3 Hvm?

3--- wmmm. HmH58 93% >38 93% Hum? HowsOmBH%oHH

NA--- mmum Hq Hum?xv; >88 ¢

$3 mWmm HoDan. 5% NnHEa=HmHHms: Hm?wmHwHmHH. Hum?

33 wanm HoCoo. Ea Hm?omwan. magma.2. OoHm8: Hymn

95 wmmm HoDoc. 33 Qaoswo€. OoHm8: mega: HUQQ Hum? HoDan. 5% woE.mBH:Huo:% HwamdHum:Eoow. H68 H- HHH

33 w.mm 8 H

M38 wmom Nmmach$3 w§.§_.= Hua?aw HL:nH:mO. H.H.o3mm 3 .mcm

2% wmmm NHUmo.3% H.:oH:mO. H,H5Emm mg: .H,H8Bwm 3 mmmm

:98 wmmm m2o<. zam wgraa H.Q.Q How:HH.Huo:.H\ om AHVo¢<9.ommag Page 31 of 92 HHSA wwm mZo<. 5% How:E. van? ¢

H32 wmmm Hmac.5% E55 .H;H5Emm HL:oH:mO. .HH.oBmm 3 mmmm ma?a: .H.HHo§mm

HoHHH8oHmHbo. HummoMn O:::_.m_ ?mlemma533.2 >mmmmmEE: 3-3 553.: m.:.a£. <

Bwd wwm 3 Zo< 23.». 99% O. @5058 .398 $38: 3&8 mags .§oBmm

3M wwm ~mZo< as <«::mB ms: .§%: WGBU 8

Ra $3: 3 mo? 58 538 ¢

£2 wanm 3 max.Goo wows<

33 Q. Q. 3 Doc. Eow Umi? Wwa?ms wowaoogm? 00:5»: 8. 3. 3 .§%: HAQH6

:23 9.8: m73%33 5.38 3. 0233 H0338

33a GEE mO2 6% H0358

83% 9.8: E 550 $3 <<:BmW. Om_.s€EH 55 m.0332:: 8, 3, 3 Ems Epsom 0. 02,319 Om?roaso 9 E823 Omwoi?Q. /<23:

U888 GEE A02 6% E38 Q. 08.53:: <33 E30: 08.33% 3 CE 35

U333 OER 3 .55. 6% <3; min: 03:33 qm?mw 0:330 So. 8. 3. cm 55 max:0332:: 25 39.83 0&5?“ mom:§oOo_B woo:m0:310 En. 8. 5 cm 030?: Qio ¢<:mo: CB 5883

Szxz?ma Q Dan 88 $33 0:350 :8. 3:58 Osaio Fe. 3 3. cm $33 Os?ao :6. Page 32 of 92 Agenda Item # 5.1

.0, <35: 3 magoséoh No~m.32.09 Zo. m38¢ maggsé gymCd mwz>HoE8o..mFa. Ema Mm O::(,:_.m_ :25? 535$ Nwmmamm?asa 3 8 _wm5§= 3.8.. <<=:_.d~Qwwcc?mav.0:31.. w.N..~ Eiolo? Z089

>mEa ummo?omEmaWmB :5 oas?i mm:omwsoa? So o€:Q.mEm~58? rum £55 EN: 38% om$6 @893 E

>58 ¢38 %§_%& H.503 om 2?: Wm:02 macaw.25 25% m33.01? ow$5 $3 9»: BmwomEu :5 Emnoao 5.5% Bawaoaa. are 19058 E3? maaasKama 1E5BmmCM§-;§ oosmcdo?mm35 m.8J~.:a-§% $555 a wmE§: E5 Oo_m.8b madam3 Ba 08.? :38 W55 SE9 waowQ.m.8mmmonoam: m.8~.o.moEmo9:: mRm?asoo w.”8 0058: £32. 3 $8. 33? 503»: on .898 mmE9. raga Sum bcazm o§%o= $032. Ba 2%: £5 §e¢§§3 aa 3 Q5 mmoowN? do? 12583 Uao?rmmmo

(E38 Ea3::.:moassa. C@333 Smm wRm?oi omwaoaa $03 $3- $3. ma<3? <<:BmAmmoDER$3-35 émm mmwmacmaoow0:310 Hmmwom. mag Oozamo.$32 $209 3 $5 mi? $35 33 23 oés?. mamowoa?om3 HQ. 0&0 ??dc?. H8. 3 Omrmém. deg :

8E.8o.a Ea. ummoNa 0:5:.m_ ?mwxmmaSauna» >mmammE2: 3 be ma?a: £82. ¢

39> I :3 93,39 maommommmm¢~.oE

05 was95% 383% 3% 55% commI «B mroé WowWoroo 2:5 docmwn:6 3 Aw3 wmasaweon :wmE<

Hro 132: cm€33 waaamUocm:Bm§ ram309% ommUoBo:mo: $3: 5.8 3.. $6 %Bo_a§ 9., mmEm_o333%7035 5 N03 m"3 E523 mama. Page 34 of 92 Agenda Item # 5.1

.<9.&o: G mow?osgvoa.N03. w3_.o9 Zo. m38.‘. maowsoé :5 HS mwz>H.oE8o.a Fa. Ema 3 O::E.m_ EawxmmaHausa» >mm8mBE: 3-3 wmE§= £82. <

.25 imam:#583‘EaocmrBmwwrumom: mwoé $5 maoi?romm?mrcocaroommo<$ :59

lei l\.~a.I. Rs .7

E. 331%. in r.__.@_w@©EE2.

w~.w>was??? 35¢; Em: ommagma I 5% A201“:mm:3. $3 Page 35 of 92 Agenda Item # 5.1

_ 9%. <38: 3 moEaBcohNo m.38. 09 2o. m38¢ m?oowéonr gymHE mwz>8E8o.8 Fa. wmmoNw O:=_:.a_ ?mlemma5:32 >mm$mE2: 3-3 w»_%a= manna».¢

. hm Os .\ZM ...Emo

.\.N§.\ NN\N§§F A§\V % ;<=.r>nn.\E uux_._z_ \\n\§§.\\V .§§m&«..xn\\ .2.\.§§S ea kn \m§\ wk. \. ..\»§N\x:.» kn \ R. §=\\<...... \.b\$$\m\

b_1§.b1h?1

wwww>58 ¢

wbwn 00:53 3% cm5.3 09 ~oE.8o$ Fe. ammowe O:=E.m_ ?auxamaSauna» >%§E2: 3-3 _waE<1= mii. ¢

UZU gmwI 5.8 Gunman6%. I Naaaammmrcés Page 37 of 92 Agenda Item # 5.1

Hois om€33 Uo8E8o_nm Fa. ummowe n:==:._ Enigma Sauna» >mm8m52: 3-3 wa.§= 3.8.. ¢

w.~.._.uWomoaasooEm: - $3

<25: HmmoEoB¢Q... 8 Hm.58.oneZo. m38 m maagsa. EdamCE mwz>~.oE.8o.aFa. Ema 3 O:=_:.m_ Ealgma MEHE2>mm8mE2: 3.8 $53: mix: ¢m1oE.E$_ was OoBBomoB_ mm.m waasaa an Eeiwmam§=._._E&§ $5 >unE8oE..E_ WA. 9 I mEm_oU?moramwaaam A>mmommBo3ma?a”woo? 3:. moon»28253

Qmmnmsm- 3:535? maamA:o:-rQ.:mmoV - wooa c?smoém I somkoaammowSoon 3:5 omm?doi 2:505 mam3:335: m.§.Bm - H52.

E?ioam I 502 _3mo€ a-Bo%=& W05 :8 o1mEm_ ,3 :5 maBo:mo: om5819. 5% - woow

Eimrom I =o:-rQ.:mmm.wmroo?omssmi owoomwsmmw ESQ - coca

- .92.; I :o:-w9.:mmoB330moan: H59.

- EooasmI :.o:-rQ.:mmo”_N:.moJ\Eimoom wooy.

I m:.so§.o I oimwxm 3:.

- >&a§ I Gm? gaasm Emonomman822:; ma

- mo§.§§ I oosozwaEoow wooa

- WoomI .25 313: mwwsm?omEd moBo E va?m o5 <39 coca ?omwm

@333» omEod?mo>8r:ao.::.m~ m.Q_a - coca

Oosaccmos .8 So :9mE.o§o& owmg?oa - wooa Page 39 of 92 Agenda Item # 5.1

8E.8o$ 30. mama3 O::E.w_ EalammaE552 >mm8mEm_: 3-3 wuiais mesa.<

@755 9a mamE 2303 $5 o:d.m§ czmnmsm2% 9% 3% 3%,? ma m??oom$5 :03» rmmso &mmsom~.oE8o.::m_ Enigma m??a.

>m.330 Emw~55 32. mooBB9,oS_ a?owwdmoon Ea 38. En Accznmmm rum$2. Boga 5. Ram: @5253 moooBBomm:o:

0181a woe%a§Eam O::E.m_ Eowxmmm

S Hmm38. since aocmomodammosowamzwoxmbsaoanm35. J89 ax?dm?o? Bm.8:m_ S. oosmddomob52:09 2o

5 9.3% mEmsmomaooom8.mmmBm:mr€9. mammmoB9,? 20 OH. EV UoBo:mnm8mmEm:momaoaom833% ommowosamo moEo

win - Q8.mma\>ooommoJ\waaam

Qmmnssm- 3203 mrommmsm - uooa

<,\Emo<

E.81o..m I Zosm - woo“.

Eimrnm I 296 - coca

I wS:.m 2050 I Z\>

I mag Eooism 83. oosoa?o - wooe mocsamnos - woow.

WoomI >mE5:mE=mHmmoBa G womamo5 - uooa mxmgmmaomEoiammmma?a - wooa

00:36:30: 8 s?mrcosnwooa0533. - Page 40 of 92

moon Agenda Item # 5.1

~.oE8o$ En. sumo3 0:552... ?awxuma535.3 >mmamm§E: 3-8 §__%a= mega. 25.3 cwzéaa. Civic

0335 wow.ao?nsdwswdm0.55.3 mowxmmo<33 9. Hioaom? maomo::8? - Hr» Eoco:< rummomwm:/53¢ owEdge”: 53¢ coomcma3 c H Wmm$5 Emnso8E.ama:.Emos9. $3 axmBEmSom35¢. J69 oxmaommwod.Bmaod? omoosmndomosB239 Z0

5 32% mEm:momaaaom9.mmmBm:mEu9. mamnoB9? Zo

OW Ev UoBo:m.:.m.8mmEm:aamaooom835$ owE835 >oEo

Oaadm mow.ma8~.BEEm02:53 moa?mmo<35 9. 59.25 moose:INK. - H50E.ow9..QrmmEm?oaom?550 9. mmmoo5m

5 Swim:S. rmmSo wo.8::m_8 S05. 55.830: :5. oon?mczam.8 ms E52.mS:&:mommooBBcE.Qom9.3.92.0“ Zo

E Ua?osmqm?m ow828$ :5 Scan omEmmaommmE.oE.8o.: ma? gas.“ %2.m:2.S. Eooam?<15 Wmmwmsrmomi 8 :5 oo§B:E$x Zo Page 41 of 92 Agenda Item # 5.1

_ ‘ <25: 3 méaacs. No m.w_.o._o3Zo. m:93 maa?ozs 22%WE mwz>~.oE8o..mFa. mum» K O:=_=.m_ ?awzmma533.2 >mmammE2: 3-3 35$: $82. $513. ewzoéa. 0:31..

95 Oo=$x:E_ mmonos:89- armvaowo?wgm ooao?si $.50 coomsmo: d WmWsmo?miE momismvBaaaasm 9. mcwwownsm

Ea %§o§ ommsmaom1

22 mmoonmamn?moan on :6 Emmaow:5 ECU. $5 dséonmma s?m?vocarooaowm$o.§. Wmso» oosmwm?omr Zo

5 WmEaiomzvam=§o§_§ 3255 9. Em.81om=

EV Hmm_m_EBmzn Zo. Page 42 of 92 Agenda Item # 5.1

<33: 3 mob8B_uQ..NS m.3%: 2o. m:89 m?oowéonr 3% Ca MWZ>~.oE8o.a Fa. wmmo3 O:=E.m_ ?aummmmEscm?>mm8m52: 8-8 wmE§= mnaa.<

A... Uo

PH w..£.om»_Uamn1u:c=" m?oowéo?r :5 Ca gm Eagma Ea E.om§.mam N: of 8 ma8 E525 m?oor ¢

$8 ma mgmrw%<9_§ SE mooomm:8 £6 comm:5 mos? omEm ?HO?Q.J\€30: 25 8mm.8 ccmoumaossmwmamsm.mumm mooosmwamomamsmooommwow:8 So 3833 oocg?a rum3% waowomom5 Q5 5580 owEm_o.r mag 85550 25 mwm:BoEmcwam8.0 Eowomam3&3 E3 989 mm.88< cczmwsmm.>E:oiBm.8_< MooommommaocsamooanoBBo83_ swammamEocomom EosmEmwm?/S: £32 Wos?mou8:: Go EindmmcmoommnsaamzwE oso _o<£ ow§%_.m_.oEa 3.53% .2: 2:: m$2 mcammoawwzasmmwmoomEomam mémw $03 :5 $523 $02. >5 mEuHoxwBm.8_%38 ma.5. EwboomaE833. _§%§8 oos?wmamsum.08: momwmsom.

E wooism2:: En Eoa?mmOosmoimmob wing Em: mumQiaomsom.Em cczmwsmmSE 3 momwmsomS mmooosmmBmE.am.Q_ov59 §%_mao= 5 En mwommamwasnewS.or:oo.EB_ ma?mmwmmmmcomaEa m.Q_o.armmomwms2. :6 E8.09 ,5: moses‘EmUa I mooodm@598 Hoimoom.wo?mooaocmr.Osaio Q. 8E8onm Fa. Ema mm O==:§_ ?aaxmmaEsuwon>mm$m52: 3-3 .353»: mas? <

I sue smTT?'x<:s:

PREUVINARV sm rm omlsmnnors 1_

’:w:\; m...» mar mg ~ m 2» was .-on R m x 4:». maawuu .:w.nwm.».r mm .mmn. mum Page 44 of 92 Agenda Item # 5.1

K:.>. wmovomommnoEm:

8E8o.a Fe. Ema 3 O=:E.m_ ?anzwma~53: >mmmmm=.E: 3-3 35$: magi. <

G WN D wN mR D N U.

I E s L! 4 3 nK 3 I ; ? vksummuzv

‘ l mrroacmsmucnou

‘—— — V » ~.—;< Page 45 of 92 Agenda Item # 5.1

A.~.w 3.8025 wmmmaboiEoowEm:

<.onEo= G maw.8B_uohN03. $2.3 Zo. m:58 m?oowéoag gymFE mwz>8E.8o.a Fa. ummmWm /\\§;g.gwx 7_w3§gr(Noam-wssr) ELEVATION kl; W Page 46 of 92 /”5\._sgu;mI sounwaasr euavmou Agenda Item # 5.1 G‘ M,

‘oul&sloemlolv(s93e1uo.gNHS 93.10999€017IS23>u;AAp[12g{)'0N199.l01dV X3013‘SIOZmaulssassv0!-WW06g‘-19q“191d9Ssuop,eAe1ge?ed ‘("!PI001EI)1§q1!‘{AA‘199J1Sp9SOdO.Ic[SI1a1zduI1U0IS19A3'11;9312111911P11?qwuwpleaI11~I0m>1o01s[1z.m1[n366-I6 ~- m.«.....=axm._..a

V .~a.»...... -an

"’£'&\-A-"‘ .. .3.

c’;'R6aJ'No''FLoo“R'"' 1o APTS AREA: 324.7 mi

,,FLOORP __BLOCK5 - zaumrs \/5\ .;.:., 'w; Page 47 of 92 \/ TOTAL mat 2.47.1.1rn’ Agenda Item # 5.1

/;\ EASTELEVATION LP“ 1 $14036 A3300;

' DUI<6S1091}I{0.IV9(QIIYI1{1.I3dO.ICI1SE‘H101191111)9€017I SSIIBIJ'0N109.l01I001$I)1(q1!‘lAA‘199J1Sp9SOd0.IdSI1a1zdu11UOESJQAa?mua?pr; ?qwuzmplva1{u0AA>{oo1g[1z.1n1[n366-16 ,”1\§9§1H_rsLEvAnoN \/. W ..g

NOT FOR ocusmwnou

‘ I:-1.15:1

>z:~n v-w

" ” sRou}'ib}=1'b6Ez’“ 13 THS (2 STO AREA:1205.3

V Page 48 of 92 Agenda Item # 5.1 BASEMENT’ AREA; 1205.3 ml

/.,\§9.um_sL.,.§y:~3o~ /\ fVl,QQ3VfL.;_\”NS- BLOCK C - 21 UNITS cum .-.2» S/«X: C) V TOTALAREN 3,551.7 u-F , $314036Acgoo‘

".3111S1091[I{O1V(911111{1.Iedo.Idqmog)9€0’VIS sutz[({'0N199!01cIpun suo;112A91g['§IOZmaulssassv0!-mauo117“19qu191d9S98nd3 >[oo1g‘(u11>1001a)Kq1um‘aaax1spesodolgSI 138dIIII“W919./\.g'1'17a?mpla?P1”I?qwHIMPWEIq1~I0m>1o01s[tz.In1[n366-I6 O:_::.a_ ?anxmwmEEE3 >mm8mEE: 3-3 ma?a: mqaa. €313. Ezowma. Dixie

K\ sire cRo§ssEcno~

VREUMIHWY \srrEcnosssecnou

wmm .2: ma: I-hm Mu. ~. 2 m we

, niérocmn ccuowzmw ‘ S' Y» I/\.'N'< 1\‘.'\'L_LY -mm .c.m. ..~.~.ammo I Page 49 of 92 Agenda Item # 5.1

A.H.m waocommm299 I moomosmHraosmrOoEd§.m

~oE8o$ Fa. Ema Aw O::_:.m_ E??amaH363» >mmamm52: 3-3 _wwEsm= mesa.95:3 :w3..E.5. Oiwlo

PM>:2.=u:

>m:5 €=.._5mmon 90 32$ 53 woo:3333 mm53% so Eoaxmmo<35? 8% %mmac?m:oBm:mm$mEa=.. mp malaumaWammmrz.~=~.oE82=..m_ also 38 9% a maHow93 owEa maoza m?dmmoOonm?dmaos GEES. mumWm mowmmm?omwow.:5 2235 w.:.mm.m.,5 55% Onomwman:5 wmE§: £32 ©#o<:§m_ maas? H8,§.Emo QdmmgmF 3:: om?o: 232 Sr 90 38 moms;So on? @303 cm 53 9% 8:5 25338 8 :5 %§a§ So:8 EoaxmmaOosm?émmos Uwmiow>m9.8 Wm _m«mo_<

£5 csz?bmma 8 wm?cis ms»? 55 5%. So :3» I :.wsw- rownmmanEEo:m :35 68: Nana Bani? Q:533% .8353.H3 Ed§om_ omSQ gammaSana H20 :95. axiom o<9. 33.

#5 §...:,.,_.Emm:30 oE-:

MEN O::.:.m_

O::S.m=vn908 mso S?ommon owSQ mwmimomsm95:8 9. womwosmAoxo?u?ms Emma 032-03 53% $3 mmmooazam<39 :5 $8. 125 oz? E.8_.amm:m$2238 ma?a .8 co Ea muaoamaos338 2, Eomo58; Rmiosa <35 0258 En mumon? 8 mo:: 3.8% Page 50 of 92 Agenda Item # 5.1

~oE8o.a Fa. Ema 3 O:_::.m_ ?awxmmaE553 >mm8mE2: 3.3 553: maxi. 95:3 Bzaaa. 0:95

9: m:5=§~.% msaa?a E5 n..a2§:..= Wanoiaasammcsm

3 H332 as :3 _w:=.==mmM:emwuiis £32 EHEa 3 3....” §8:: E53

92 wmmoaon ?rm539 omEa ma§§_om§_. Hmsmmomua gammaon 90 39 Ea 532 ow$6 Eomom?Wmsosaw H30 mo

E 3»=&:c..< w§::=2:§§. ..owE..:=m:8 53:5 cs ?2.=mm¢ Emaamwa§=m 3 3 .353: mqma as 35 8 waezr. mcaa.85 <38: :55"

5 mm:8 :8B=§.&&o= 3. 2% Eve: 2:: :5 ~62 %§_3:=2: ~:.cm.omaQo: :8 :3 an 3.3 w.M____.§ mama3:. .355 .5 =mmmm::_E.mEc

Waco:P?ummoamu: mwz>-O?E.,_wO.Hm ~20. Umnx G magonmcoa8 Hm <_.§.§§§7 8F 0?? >>>.§W>HO. O>Ew E393 >H.oE.89 Page 51 of 92 Agenda Item # 5.1

8E8o.B Fa. Ema AA O:::§_ EainumaHavana>mm8mE2: 3-3 wmE§: mcaz.¢

>3.¢=&x H"w:.=..n:._.E

EHwoowm> - U. how8. Oosoommwo:20.9 uwoésm?wom$33. 0338 Hana Womiob38$ WommmaanAc:§§.om%3. EmmaWomwmsax0&8 w3. gmim?w omQo

Emwoowm> - U. hon EVOosoommwoc20.9 Hoésmw?om< AobB§.om%$. HmsmWoman?038 u8. 7\:Em3~owQo

?u woowm> - D.How Am»S. myM:mummm85 Hum:2, O:mEm_ma ow53% 03%. Wand Em: macaw.13$: ow€33. Womwosmz§:Eo€m:Q owU555. Omgio ?mdmWomior m.m:.oo_WomwmauaAc:B§om%3v FEE Wwma?m9&8 mmm.K333‘ omQo

Bu.woow>- UVboa 3 8 mancm.WomdEm: macaw.32: 3333. Womwommw§:Eo€m:.Q omU55? O=.§1o WEE WomiobF:.oo_ Womwmnw.Ac:Bwomomowov. 53 Wommm?w0&8 M3. ?:Bm.:.

Ba 98 $33 I m?o.8B_uQ.A...man9...33.

HQ 212.0 =_&§§ §m.8:om_ >:mmow$5 0952 om0:610. Oamao?cwHE. mamawGo; H3058. $3.

?x E5.5mBwFZ5; .49.: :8 no__§5__ omHOS: Bo(BE

EmUaocmaozm 39 U98 w9.8§NNo. QoswamaOosm.mo8_..Umnoow::&:mm?ioom. mgaswe. :3 83.

BS :OE.oESmmomm025$ H02? 99:3 wmm»SE Woman»...wdms $383 38.

#3 955902. <39 was ¢§:§.. mo?s?. 132: >8ESmr m%§£§. 53. BE. Page 52 of 92 Agenda Item # 5.1

H.oE.8o.aFa. mmmo& 0::_:.m_ mawzmmaSauna» >mmmmm:.2: 3-3 w»_9s..= £32. ¢

>E.a=&xNu2_m=5ac_cw%

Hg §§o%5m.,\ swam.8 HmmomaorwwsmgmamummmmommSo wommmmo

5 Woioé om3.5; cmWomoaaboaomEonammaFauna”>mmommBo=.awnowmanm3 :8 gsaogmman

3 Comma:<39 gsioau? ?aw

Ev Woioé owP.o

7Q Woioé omWomwosamamZEEo€m_ OwmonmEmsm<39 Bmwood.8 Eoazmmow

H.oE8o8$_ m§.:E8m. Eoaxmmooon?osaamea Eassm @2538 ow9813 E33 a:H.oE

<5 msmmmo5 838.0: 3 :5 038.8 bung Womwmsua

S5 Woioé mum>mmommUa

~oE.8o8 Fa. Ema Am n=§:.. ?mwxmmm~53: >mmmmmBm=» 3-3 wa%a= mama.<

>3.m=&xmuw3m:e5 3 >:Ec§ mmrmnamo..xommmm_o2>_. xmmc_<_m

S3833. mm:33m:_.m. m.>3? _<_O>>._<_m>_n 0«E:mQ 3.8 mmoczasmcmzsmm9“ mmz>3E.?mQm En. > Qmm.:n_o3

3.33 magmmmwmnmwmammm: >3E.8n.c <_:nm3 mmmacmnma$03 Em cE«mm 1:03 m_o<<:.8<<: 3:: Eocmim.8 :92 no33:E:mm .8 Em?ozm1m:o3E$n.n manno33:E.2 Emzsmw<<:m1mEmEmm 32.03.2101 n_mm_mE:m:m<< no33:E:mm. _oE:m 3oQ:_mm mag no33m«n.m_ mam_.mmEm::m_ :3: ..o_.3m. _n:__< mag

_”m3_=m=

<.:nm:.n0.223 m_m:mm250:3 2 Emamm?:_:mn:m:o:$03 9: 0:310 _._m1.8mm.Im‘mcmm:Em Em: 2 Em caaamm_.>n>n.9.5. :mmumm:mn:

_Amm:_

v..o¢mmmmo:m_ _<_m3_um«mEum" Page 54 of 92 Agenda Item # 5.1

Now» .8 EmmmiI _<_m3_om:>_Um2m >mmon_m:o: 2 >_8E.82m N03 .8 vammmi1 __.;m3. $.53? >mmoQm:o: 2 133% P.o.ammm_o:m_m

$3 .8 _3mmm3I _<_m3Um5O:.B_._o >mmoQm:o: 96>:E:m2m.mmm_m.mm_.mo_mmmm

Hmmm.8 EmmmiI 23352. mo:E:mn.ES_ _:m:.E~m 959:83

8E.8o.HmFm. wmmm5 O:::_.w_ ?mwxmmmEdwm?>mmmmmEm=» 3-3 wmasmsmama.359% awzséa. 0:31.. no33:::< _<_m3_um..mZ_um_

No? .8 I _<.m3cm5Im?mmm<<:§<>>n>o A92: 0*<<:_E< B8 .8 MEN - _:3Ezm2cS_ no:mm2m:o: 2:82 no_.:3_.nmm 8 Em I353 3 sE_E<

$8 .8 $8 I _<_m3cm_.\n:m_«3m:. _._m18mmcx§_%m>>m>n. 4053 2 cxvzqmm

- 3:E:mnE$_ no:mm2m:o: >n_<.mo2no333mm .8 Em +92: 9“ cxvzamm

$8 .8 88 I _<_m3Um:3.9% 9?Em mo?m?_<_m3o:m_.4.053 o.ncx_o1amm - E

$9. .8 N8» I _<_m3um3mmom_m:o:.m8:m<.__m

I .:

$3 8 Hmmm I _<_m3cm:nm_m§m:o: 0+Em >13 no33_£mm. .353 2 Cxczamm - 3

_u..o..mmm.o:m_>n:<_:mm 23. mm_m2mn _u_6_.mo$" mxum:<<_Emmm I _._m_._.8mm_<_m:m_2.n 133% _3_umn» m3.nm3m=$\xm_oo2m"

I 98¢: S:Emmm I Imz?mm .<_m:m_? Oimao 12.3% .332 m?mamamzn 8 Um.m

_<_::_n_nm_woman- 9. ._.o..o:.3 Eo_a8_a." mmnom:.~mammm: mx_om1::Imwxmmm_<.m:mG 3 Em >:m_cvmm_o.“Em Q2 ow_<:mm.mmmcmm <_:nm3 _<_mmmm:m__uUmm_9“Em m.8.83m2 3., Em _3_omQ2. m:m<< n_:.£m« o? :o3mm ._.os3 2 >503 2o:-UmnZo: o: m:mEm: 31 5:6 on Em Qmq: .32 nc_.E3_ rmsqmnmum:._m1.Bmm 568 _»mm§m_.mo__:vcmm_2 Em A92: 9" _<_m_,_Em3 w<-_.m<

8r:mo.a So. cmmmAm O:=:§_ ?mlnmmmEzum?>mmmmm3m.: 8-8 _wmE§.= mcaa.<

I _._m_.:mmm_3umQ mSnm3m3 I S wm:mo3 mzmmv _._m..:mmm_3_om2 m::m3m3 88 m88 _.mm=m >E.o_,m" £32. .qo<<_..9. x_E3o:n_ _.=__“ >:m_<~mamammcEo«ma mIm?mmm_3umn.n >:m_503. «m:o:m_<~mo_m:n_m:Eo_.mq mImimmm_3vm2 xmm3..m:o..: m.8.nm3m:1o« Em _3_om29. mu3_oommo_mm3_- Qm.8Emo_ man..8<:E:mn1o« Em _o_m::mo__.m.n..8E:o: mammxumsaoz 2 2% _._m1.8mmESE <3: m:mSm Em cs?cm 2.23. 125% .332 _~m<_m<<>mmmmm3m:nI .nmm.E«mm3 E; _mc__n::m<<___Em§mmm2mn_. 33 mmud Euzsn>«E_.nmQ *3 Em _.m:o:m_\ooqU1n_mm Imz?mmno:mm2m:o: _u_mE2. 3 Em Q2 2 .Em m._<2 ._.m:m:» zocmm:umm_m:m»m& 3::mn1o« Em _2m_om$:o: 2 mno:.n.m2m:o: Em: 22.3% .332 mS»m3m3 Locum mBog zmm_m 3. E_m Umnmsm?ma_._o3m 3o<_:m mmm_.mm:_.no.“ mama gm:m_:E:mn1o« Em uqmum?mzos3 mno:mm2m:o: Em: Q2 3 :m_3::m2 .03 Em Qmvmqmzos2 mno:mm2m:o: 2.3 qm:o

W»V 8r:mo.a Em. wmmm3 0::E.m_ Enigma ~53: >wmmmmE2: 3-3 .355: mama.¢

>%_2zm mm-c$" >3::mn.E..m_ 923. m:Em==mm" up S3oc=m<<: >_,E:m2 8.. mno:..n_..:mnnsEo Qmm?mg >3:_.8nE_.m_ 09.26. _oc._&:m5.8 no:go3.:E3 mczmm.Em mxmmzsm 93.138 33? >13 m92.3 m:n_n..§a_..:a £<_mm 3 Ea _:xc«< ~-m3«m<:35. Emz?mmm_:m_o:mn_«mmEm::m_ no33:::<.

.<=xmacmm_._.am2n _A_m_=_o:_.mmnamm._.E:m2 :E_.8n.EE_ 933. OE w_.oow=:-Ew _<.m<_.E:m2 Ea Em 32: mag mx?msmmoz3 o_o<<:.8<<: mnncxmnm:m-Qmm:o: 3 mmo_.m.m:.Dcmms>339 w3o_A::.m xmqzmmm_u_mE2.m 3m_: mimm?_.n_..:mn1o« Ea _<:xmacmmno33m_,Qm_\ xmma_m::m_ no:n_o33E3 :m-Qmm.8m Em =mm:mwmm:nmxmS

_:m:E:o:m_" moimam: mnoE.+<=_m mam<0; U:Em3 _._m_.:mmm xm__<

S an_§o_a mama._<_mu_mu >..E:mn1o« mno33m8_m_ :=£_ msaam3 _uo<<:.8<<: _<_m_o_m.mIm?mmm.n:2m::

_ O <33; 3 m?m.8:EQ..mom.w3_.oo...Zo. m38¢ m?oowéom?mZncmWE mwz>HoE8o.a Fa. cmmomo O::.:.m_ EalnamaEEE3 >mm8mE2: 3-3 55$: mssa.<

Ea 3 Wave: Page 58 of 92 Agenda Item # 5.1

<23. 3 mo?o?cobnoHm.32.3 Zo. m:53 mag?onr gymwa mwz>H.oE8o.aFa. Ema 3 Agenda Item # 5.1

LACAQ Townof Whitby Notice of Public Meeting

Meeting Date: January 4, 2016 Meeting Time: 7:30 p.m.

' Meeting Location: Meeting Hall,Whitby Municipal Building 575 Rossland Road East Whitby, Ontario File Number(s): Z—17-15/ SP-17-15

of the Councilof A Public Meeting willbe held by the Planning andDevelopment Committee Zoning By-law No. the Corporation of the Town of Whitby to consider an applicationto amend 1784, as amended, (File Z—17-15)as submitted by StockworthMBG Limited. application, in The applicant has submitted all informationand fees required to consider the Regulation 545-06. accordance with Section 34 of the Planning Act R.S.O. 1990 and Ontario 91, 95, And 99 The subject land for which the applicationhas been filed is located within BaldwinStreet, andis illustratedon the map below.

s 2 I ; .-., 2 ,: \ » 1 ‘E:1 ’ ; ; » v ? i . £3 «. i

‘ 0 3 ': l E . E ‘. g 5 l‘ l 1 l .-. , George St

‘ ' '\ i I i 2 ' I E « = . '» 3: 5. % l E 5 ! v: 1, I a g a 2 3, i ' ‘ ' i.

‘ ‘ 1 l : . » ; l l l l l 2,. L 1...; % l E l.. . _ .

E“: o I! :w,:.._ ....} «*5: ‘ ~ 4 or I W :00; g .; E

"""‘~‘ v i» W I, 4 i i l1 _ s 2 l ‘ “ i i l l9 . l_,__. . .,.i 2 James Sl T i 1 l i a l i

Page 1 of 2

Page 59 of 92 Agenda Item # 5.1

2!‘:-uwov-.-:9-9-5

8 _‘< mu..:.n..zé?am 5? a....§¥\.i1.c womoiw....l3z3... E€....«Jc ‘En 1A..§5.:, 1 9 sinuo 2. ....3l

“ t :5. 5. . 9:9. 3 3.. 353% 51. a%é@t 23.... mum 3.57.}; oi?zo .i93o..e En}... vi. Z~n.5E :53: Se 03.5..» .52 Rcnrv?o? IP31. Sac tn ...... w...... n.o.‘.r.-la ~»¢..¢:§:.uu . .5...... e.3..§.aa._t \m.§_T i._:> .\\.,’ moot Eiozo . /.\.,.. w§e.§m _MwamE.....s ..50K._bD ozaeoz. . 4... ua h. xoqd azaomu 60510/6 ,.m.CZD.Nns_Db . ....3.r..:.x..§... . .oE<_=a.z mmkmw .52 E 3.5.» .n3.. .9. 5o.:=_x5z 53 < xoo._m . E . A929,? Zmm ;...... nu_..,..ltv_

Q. §

ZOEBDEMZOO «on #02 E<_,___=..n._§

_ ::c€~‘-‘ix 1

v=Au.u « E .52 5: ny<..u5_.5.K\\ 5.2 uzuwui

1. 3.: s¢..f1re..y3:

#1. a. :21. cu. 3....

..§.n.zH...... :.a::.. ..1z.i...n!

_...£:.i 5.3%) 0.3..

:.i4..S.§

<._n.<~zu.. 535 _..:u . Eusuxbann .>w5mz..>.<.:3zao =3 >.a_>uz.=.u:u n :33 z.u.>ux :95 a=¢.2i

Susux Euao 2.5.3": 31:. >Gsu.:5..a Iauaa. :.u_>u..=.u:u :..Eo.: >.E

See back page for site statistics.

Page 60 of 92 Agenda Item # 6.1

Town of Whitby Office of the Town Clerk 575 Rossland Road East, Whitby, ON L1N 2M8 www.whitby.ca

December 17, 2015

Margaret Clayton Chair LACAC Heritage Whitby

Re: Passage of By-law to Designate Property under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act

Please be advised that at its meeting held on December 15, 2015, Town of Whitby Council enacted By-law #7074-15 to designate R.A. Sennett, 300 King Street, Whitby, as being of cultural heritage value or interest under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act, R.S.O. 1990, O.18, Section 29.

A copy of the by-law has been attached for your reference.

Yours Truly,

Susan Cassel Deputy Clerk

Encl.

Copy: S. Ashton, Planner II, Planning Department J. Gilston, Committee Secretary

Page 61 of 92 Agenda Item # 6.1

Town of Whitby By-law # 7074-15

Heritage Designation By-law Being a By-law to designate R.A. Sennett Public School, 300 King Street, Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, Third Double Range, Plan H50032, Lot 17 and Part of Lots 18, 19 and 20, Third Double Range, Plan H50032, Part of Parts 1 and 2, Plan 40R-4729 being Gilbert Street, as closed by By-law D-84040, Plan H-50032, Whitby, Ontario as being of cultural heritage value and interest] Whereas in accordance Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act, the Council of the Corporation of the Town of Whitby considers it desirable to designate the property, hereinafter described to be of cultural heritage value and interest; And Whereas, the Council of the said Corporation has caused notice to be served in accordance with Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act; And Whereas, no person has served a notice of objection to the proposed designation on the Clerk of the said Corporation; Now therefore, the Council of The Corporation of the Town of Whitby hereby enacts as follows: 1. General 1.1. The property known as R.A. Sennett Public School, 300 King Street, Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, Third Double Range, Plan H50032, Lot 17 and Part of Lots 18, 19 and 20, Third Double Range, Plan H50032, Part of Parts 1 and 2, Plan 40R-4729 being Gilbert Street, as closed by By-law D-84040, Plan H-50032, and more particularly described in Schedule ‘A’ attached to and forming part of this by- law is designated as being of cultural heritage value and interest under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act and shall be listed in the register maintained for such purpose. 2. Schedule(s) 2.1. Schedule ‘A’ – Designation Statement and Report of 300 King Street, Whitby as prepared on December 8, 2014 by D. Gardner 3. Effective Date 3.1. The provisions of this by-law shall come into force and take effect on the day of the final passing thereof.

Page 62 of 92 Agenda Item # 6.1

Original Approved and Signed.

Don Mitchell, Mayor

Original Approved and Signed.

Christopher Harris, Town Clerk

By-law Name: Heritage Designation By-law By-law # 7074-15 Page 2 of 2

Page 63 of 92 Agenda Item # 6.1

Schedule A to By-law # 7074-15

| Designation Report and Statement

300 KING STREET, WHITBY, ONTARIO

DESIGNATION STATEMENT AND REPORT

Prepared by Deirdre Gardner

December 8, 2014

| Designation Statement and Report

Page 64 of 92 Agenda Item # 6.1

| Designation Statement200 King Street, Whitby, Ontario

DESIGNATION STATEMENT

DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY 300 KING STREET, WHITBY, ONTARIO

R.A.SENNETT PUBLIC SCHOOL

The R.A. Sennett Public School is an early 20th century one-storey with raised basement red brick school building dating from 1920-21 situated on the town block bounded by King, Dunlop, Henry and Gilbert Streets in Whitby, Ontario. This town block has been the location of a public school since 1854.

STATEMENT OF CULTURAL HERITAGE VALUE OR INTEREST

The cultural heritage value of the R.A. Sennett Public School is evident in its design, historical associations and contextual value. The R.A. Sennett Public School is a landmark in the neighbourhood and an important heritage asset for the Town of Whitby. Designed in a Classical Revival style, it is an excellent example of scholastic architecture constructed in Ontario in the early 20th century. The R.A. Sennett Public School was designed by prominent architects, Chapman, Oxley and Bishop. The building remained unaltered until 1958, when additions were added to the north and south elevations. In April 1987, a gymnasium was added to the Henry Street elevation.

DESCRIPTION OF HERITAGE ATTRIBUTES Key exterior attributes that exemplify the heritage value of the R.A. Sennett Public School as a unique architectural former school landmark in Whitby include:

• Designed in the Classical Revival style popular in the early 1920s for scholastic architecture • Distinctive square plan one storey in height with a full height basement and low pitched hip roof with central square skylight and overhanging eaves • The roofline on the façade features a centrally positioned cupola. The cupola has a polygonal base with sections defined by pilasters and louvered panels topped with a polygonal shaped dome. • Central entrance articulated with classical motifs including pilasters defined by a semi-elliptical arched shaped transom window with an asymmetrical radiating glazing bar system and central quoin • Tall, thin rectangular windows grouped in a six by six arrangement on the north, south, east and west elevations with plain sills and moulded lintels

| 300 King Street, Whitby, Ontario 1

Page 65 of 92 Agenda Item # 6.1

| Designation Report, 300 King Street, Whitby, Ontario

300 KING STREET, WHITBY Werden’s Plan West of Brock Street, Lots 1,2,3,4,17,18,19,20 Third Double Range

R.A.SENNETT PUBLIC SCHOOL

DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY The R.A. Sennett Public School was built in 1920-21 on lots 1, 2, 3, and 4 of the Werden Plan situated on the town block bounded by King, Dunlop, Henry and Gilbert Street in Whitby, Ontario. The block was the location of a public school since 1854. The Henry Street Public School was built on Lots 1 and 2 on the corner of Dunlop and Henry Street and was used as a public school from 1854 until 1920. The land was not recorded as being sold to the Whitby Board of School Trustees until 1858. The lot was originally part of the land holdings of Asa Werden (1779-1866), a prominent land owner who owned all of the land extending from Brock Street in the east to Henry Street in the west, Dundas Street to the north and Burns Street to the south. These lands were registered as Werden’s Plan in 1854. The R.A. Sennett Public School was designed by prominent architects, Chapman & Oxley in partnership with Roy Hartnoll Bishop. The building remained unaltered until 1958, when additions were added to the north and south elevations. In April 1987, a gymnasium was added to the Henry Street elevation.

CONTEXT

In 1854, the Henry Street School included two rooms and faced Dunlop Street. The school was completed the year before the Town of Whitby was incorporated in 1855. There were only two other schools in Whitby during this period; a school house on Anderson Street and a brick schoolhouse built in 1851 in Port Whitby. The school enrolment for the Henry Street Public School was approximately 250 students when it was completed. By 1864, a second storey had been added to the school building due to increased enrollment. A wooden staircase provided access to the additional two classrooms on the second floor. As a result of this alteration, the entrance to the school was moved to Henry Street.

Overcrowding was still an issue after the additional classrooms were added. The Whitby Board of Education continued to acquire the adjoining lots in the block with the purchase of lots 3 and 4 from Elizabeth Kester on November 21, 1881. In 1893, the Henry Street Public School was condemned and deemed to be in dangerous condition because it had not been well-maintained. Lack of funds prevented the school from being repaired. It took many years before these issues could be addressed since there were not enough funds to build a new school.

By 1920, funds had been found to start construction on a new school. On July 4, 1920, the Henry Street Public School was destroyed by a fire that was started in the staircase. The insurance funds contributed to the construction costs for the new school.

The Board of Education voted to replace the Henry Street Public School with a new building on February 11, 1920. The school was designed by the prominent architectural firm of Chapman & Oxley in partnership with Roy Hartnoll Bishop. In August 1921, the school design was described in an article in The Globe as “unique and the school is one of the finest educational buildings recently constructed in

| 300 King Street, Whitby, Ontario 1

Page 66 of 92 Agenda Item # 6.1

| Designation Report, 300 King Street, Whitby, Ontario

Ontario”. The final construction cost of the school was $55,000. The new school was a red brick building, one storey in height with a full height basement with separate basement level entrances on the north and south elevations.

A later purchase from Leonora Lawler of lots 17, 18, 19, and 20 was completed on February 25, 1930 and created the school yard to the south of the existing school building.

Due to increasing enrollment with the post-war growth of Whitby, in 1958, a decision was made to construct two wings on the north and south elevations of the building that would provide additional classrooms. The two wings cost $87,275 and altered the original north and south elevations. They were positioned in the location of the former basement level access doors visible in archival photos. These new classrooms would be used in lieu of the basement classrooms that were opened in 1950. By the 1980s, the need for a gymnasium in the school was identified. In 1987, at a cost of $650,000, a gymnasium was added to the Henry Street façade.

The first principal of the King Street Public School was Robert Allan Sennett from completion of the school in 1921 to his retirement in June, 1952. The school was renamed the R.A. Sennett Public School in honour of its first principal at a ceremony on September 29, 1979. At this point in the site history, it had been the location of a school for over 125 years.

With declining enrollment a review of the usage of the R.A. Sennett Public School began in 2009. The Durham District School Board decided to close the school in June, 2010.

ARCHITECTS, CHAPMAN, OXLEY & BISHOP The King Street Public School was designed by the architectural partnership of Chapman, Oxley & Bishop. Roy Hartnoll Bishop (1888-1948) was born in Toronto on August 4, 1888 to Charles and Mary Bishop and graduated from the School of Architecture at the University of Toronto in 1912. His father, Charles Hartnoll Bishop (1851-1924) was an architect and the Superintendent of Buildings for the Toronto Board of Education for thirty years from 1882-1915. During that period he was responsible for the design of many of the school buildings erected during a period when the city of Toronto was rapidly expanding.

Roy Bishop’s student apprenticeship was completed with the firm Darling & Pearson in 1908-10. He later worked with the firms Chapman & McGiffin as a draftsman in 1910-12, and Sproatt & Rolph in 1912-14. In 1914, he went overseas with the Royal Canadian Engineers as a Lieutenant and served in the First World War until 1918.

In 1919, his mentor, architect Alfred H. Chapman, formed a partnership with Bishop and another of his protégés, James Morrow Oxley forming the firm Chapman, Oxley & Bishop, Architects and Engineers. James Morrow Oxley was born in Halifax in September 1883 and graduated from the University of Toronto. Oxley served in WWI and had earlier been a partner in the structural engineering firm of Oxley and Harkness. Oxley had worked with Chapman on Knox College located on the University of Toronto campus, and the R.S. Williams Building located at 145 Yonge Street in 1912. Chapman, Oxley, and Bishop

| 300 King Street, Whitby, Ontario 2

Page 67 of 92 Agenda Item # 6.1

| Designation Report, 300 King Street, Whitby, Ontario completed a number of significant projects during the period 1920-26. Bishop left the firm in the early 1920s opening his own architectural practice. Chapman and Oxley remained in partnership until 1949.

The drawings for many of these projects are now part of the architectural drawing collection at the Ontario Archives as part of the Alfred H. Chapman Fonds and include ninety-two architectural drawings, sixty-two ink on paper drawings, and twenty-two blueprints. The collection also includes eight ink on linen drawings of the King Street Public School.

In 1924, Bishop opened his own office in Toronto, with a branch in Oshawa located at the corner of Bond and Mary Streets. Other Oshawa commissions included the General Motors Administration Offices on William Street East at Kenneth Avenue in 1927. In 1927, he also designed houses for General Motors employees on the streets Hillcroft, Grierson and Mary Street North and the Oshawa Arena on King Street West. Bishop also designed a factory for Skinner Company on Simcoe Street South at Wolfe Street in 1929. He partnered with Charles Dolphin to design a garage for Ontario Motor Sales at Mary and King Streets which later became the Oshawa Times building.

Bishop’s most significant commission from the period was the Art Deco design for the Tip Top Tailors Clothing Company building on Lakeshore Boulevard in Toronto completed in 1929-30. Bishop joined the RCAF in 1940 and served in WW2, then resumed his practice in 1944. He became company architect for Dominion Stores Limited supervising their post-war plans for stores across Canada until his death in Toronto on December 28, 1948.

The 1958 additions to the King Street School were designed by a local architect, Herbert G. Cole who had completed projects including Streetsville United Church and Markdale Hospital. H.G. Cole completed a number of projects in Whitby including the United Church Sunday School (1955), Hebron Christian Reformed Church (1956 demolished in 2003), Palmerston Public School, the Kathleen Rose Memorial School (demolished in 2004), and the Dundas Street School addition in 1956.

The three thousand square foot gymnasium addition added to the Henry Street elevation of the school in 1987 was designed by Oshawa architect, Lennis Trotter.

ARCHITECTURAL STYLE The Classical Revival style was one of the most influential architectural styles incorporated into school buildings in Canada in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Many religious, civic, and scholastic institutions were designed in the Classical Revival style and constructed during this period throughout Canada. The Classical Revival style was based on studies of Greek and Roman buildings. Classical Revival designs imparted classical scale and proportions to civic buildings.

R.A. SENNETT SCHOOL The R.A. Sennett Public School is a landmark in the neighbourhood and an important heritage asset for the Town of Whitby. Designed in a Classical Revival style, it is an excellent example of scholastic architecture constructed in Ontario in the early 20th century. The new school constructed in 1920-21 is one-storey in height with a full height basement and at the time of its construction it had a separate basement level entrances on the north and south elevations. The square plan is distinctive with a low

| 300 King Street, Whitby, Ontario 3

Page 68 of 92 Agenda Item # 6.1

| Designation Report, 300 King Street, Whitby, Ontario pitched hipped roof with central square skylight and overhanging eaves. Constructed in red brick with large windows, it is topped by an elaborate cornice with wide overhang and bracket detailing.

The basement level would allow for further classroom expansion if needed and the ample grouped window placement provided natural light. The school design included a central assembly hall on the main floor surrounded by six classrooms. The assembly hall was finished in wood panelling and incorporated a central skylight. The principal’s office was located on the west side of the building. The first classroom designed specifically as a Kindergarten room in a Whitby school was located on the south-east corner.

The central entrance features classical motifs such as pilasters defined by a semi-elliptical arched shaped transom window with an asymmetrical radiating glazing bar system and central quoin. The roofline on the façade features a centrally positioned cupola. The cupola has a polygonal base with sections defined by pilasters and louvered panels topped with a polygonal shaped dome. The original sash windows were tall, thin rectangular windows, six over six in groupings of six. The original windows have been replaced. The plain sills and moulded lintels have been preserved.

OWNERSHIP HISTORY The R.A. Sennett Public School was built in 1920-21 on lots 1, 2, 3, and 4 of the Werden Plan situated on the town block bounded by King, Dunlop, Henry and Gilbert Street in Whitby, Ontario. Lots 1 and 2 were purchased from prominent landowner, Asa Werden in 1858. With possible expansion in mind, the Whitby Board of Education continued to acquire the adjoining lots in the block with the purchase of lots 3 and 4 at the corner of Dunlop and King Street on November 21, 1881 from Elizabeth Kester. A later purchase from Leonora Lawler of lots 17, 18, 19, and 20 was completed on February 25, 1930 creating the school yard to the south of the King Street Public School.

| 300 King Street, Whitby, Ontario 4

Page 69 of 92 Agenda Item # 6.1

| Designation Report, 300 King Street, Whitby, Ontario

Henry Street School was built in 1854 on the block bounded by King, Dunlop, Henry, and Gilbert Streets in Whitby. The front entrance faced Henry Street. The school was destroyed by fire on July 4, 1920. The R.A. Sennett Public School is now located on the site. (1919, Harry Pellow, Whitby Archives, 10-009-001.)

King Street School, 1947, unknown photographer, Whitby Archives, 10-010-004.

| 300 King Street, Whitby, Ontario 5

Page 70 of 92 Agenda Item # 6.1

| Designation Report, 300 King Street, Whitby, Ontario

King Street School, c.1925, Unknown Photographer. Whitby Archives, P2013_001_010.

King Street School, Room 2 with students from 1923, unknown photographer, Whitby Archives, 10-010-041.

| 300 King Street, Whitby, Ontario 6

Page 71 of 92 Agenda Item # 6.1

| Designation Report, 300 King Street, Whitby, Ontario

King Street School, c.1924, J.E. Evans, Whitby Archives, 10-010-003.

King Street School, c.1922, unknown photographer, Whitby Archives, 10-010-001.

| 300 King Street, Whitby, Ontario 7

Page 72 of 92 Agenda Item # 6.1

| Designation Report, 300 King Street, Whitby, Ontario

OTHER WORKS BY CHAPMAN, OXLEY & BISHOP

For the new partnership of Chapman, Oxley and Bishop, the early 1920s was a period of distinctive production within the firm. In 1921, the firm was commissioned to design the Sunnyside Amusement Park on the newly defined Lakeshore Boulevard in Toronto. The work included design of the Bathing Pavilion (1921-22) and Deans Boat House and Dance Hall (1921-22), later called the Palais Royale plus various other structures within the complex including pavilions, public shelters, kiosks and ticket offices. Only the Sunnyside Pavilion and Palais Royale are still standing.

Sunnyside Park Bathing Pavilion, Lake Shore Boulevard, August 1922. (City of Toronto Archives, Fonds 1231, Item 540)

Maple Leaf Baseball Stadium (1925-26) in March 1929. Located at Fleet and Bathurst Streets and demolished in 1965. City of Toronto Archives, Fonds 1231, Item 465.

| 300 King Street, Whitby, Ontario 8

Page 73 of 92 Agenda Item # 6.1

| Designation Report, 300 King Street, Whitby, Ontario

Chapman, Oxley and Bishop also designed the Maple Leaf Baseball Stadium for businessman Lol Solman in 1925. In 1921-22, the firm designed the Pure Food Building as part of the Canadian National Exhibition complex of buildings. In 1923, Chapman, Oxley and Bishop worked together on the Albert College on Highland Avenue in Belleville.

West entrance to the Pure Food Building at the C.N.E., May 1941. (City of Toronto Archives, Fonds 200, Series 372, Subseries 1, Item 1571.)

The Tip Top Tailors building designed by Roy Hartnoll Bishop with Maple Leaf Baseball Stadium designed by Chapman, Oxley and Bishop completed in 1925-26 to the east.

| 300 King Street, Whitby, Ontario 9

Page 74 of 92 Agenda Item # 6.1

| Designation Report, 300 King Street, Whitby, Ontario

Goad’s Insurance Plan of the City of Whitby, 1901 (Revised June 1911) (Henry Street Public School at Arrow)

| 300 King Street, Whitby, Ontario 10

Page 75 of 92 Agenda Item # 6.1

| Designation Report, 300 King Street, Whitby, Ontario

R.A. Sennett Public School, 300 King Street, Whitby

Front entrance of R.A. Sennett Public School, 300 King Street, Whitby

| 300 King Street, Whitby, Ontario 11

Page 76 of 92 Agenda Item # 6.1

| Designation Report, 300 King Street, Whitby, Ontario

Corner detail with cornice and brackets

South elevation showing the rear of the 1920-21 school, the addition dating from 1958 and the gymnasium addition from 1987.

| 300 King Street, Whitby, Ontario 12

Page 77 of 92 Agenda Item # 6.1

| Designation Report, 300 King Street, Whitby, Ontario

North elevation with view of grouped windows of original building with addition dating from 1958 on the right.

South elevation and south wing (1958)

| 300 King Street, Whitby, Ontario 13

Page 78 of 92 Agenda Item # 6.1

| Designation Report, 300 King Street, Whitby, Ontario

Rear of original school building and north wing

Front (East) elevation and Side (south) elevation showing portion of south wing

| 300 King Street, Whitby, Ontario 14

Page 79 of 92 Agenda Item # 6.1

| Designation Report, 300 King Street, Whitby, Ontario

BIBLIOGRAPHY Archival Sources Goad’s Fire Insurance Atlas, 1911 Photographs, Whitby Archives and Whitby Planning Department Books Dendy, William. Lost Toronto. Oxford University Press, 1978. Dendy, William & Kilbourn, William. Toronto Observed: Its Architecture, Patrons and History. Oxford University Press, 1986 Kalman, Harold. A History of Canadian Architecture, Volume 2. Oxford University Press, 1994. Research Winter, Brian. Historical Report, R.A. Sennett Public School. November 30, 2011.

On- line Sources “Roy Hartnoll Bishop” entry in Biographical Dictionary of Architects in Canada, 1850-1950 link to dictionary of architects in Canada “Charles Hartnoll Bishop” entry in Biographical Dictionary of Architects in Canada, 1850-1950 link to dictionary of architects in Canada “Albert C. Chapman” entry in Biographical Dictionary of Architects in Canada, 1850-1950 Link to dictionary of Architects in Canada “James Morrow Oxley” entry in Biographical Dictionary of Architects in Canada, 1850-1950 link to dictionary of Architects in Canada

| 300 King Street, Whitby, Ontario 15

Page 80 of 92 Agenda Item # 6.2

20162016Winter / hiver

Quarterly Publication of Community Heritage Ontario / Patrimoine communautaire de l'Ontario

Grimbsy Wins the 2015 Prince of Wales Prize

Michael Seaman he Town of Grimsby has earned national honours as the T2015 recipient of the Prince of Wales Prize for Municipal Heritage Leadership. This award was established in 1999 by the Heritage Canada Foundation, now the National Trust for Canada, under the patronage of his Royal Highness the Prince of Wales. It honours a municipal government for demonstrating exemplary commitment to the preservation of its built heritage through such means as regulation, policies, funding, community engagement and education, and stewardship. The selection of Grimsby, a community of only 26,000, is a tes- tament to the enthusiasm of volunteers and willingness of heritage property owners to preserve and celebrate local heritage. This is a movement that began in 1913 when the first Grimsby Historical Society was founded in the wake of the War of 1812 Centennial Celebration. Through the efforts, awareness, and foresight of multi generations of Grimsby residents and political leaders, a culture of conservation has become entrenched in the Town to make heritage preservation a key component of municipal policies and practice. L-R: Michael Seaman, Alderman DiFlavio, Mayor Bentley, Sara Nixon. The Trust explains why Grimsby is the 2015 recipient: Though faced with developmental pressures, Grimsby has rec- demonstrated a firm commitment to investing in its heritage ognized the importance of heritage conservation in improving assets. In 1986, the Heritage Inventory was created which today quality of life and enhancing a sense of place and community. lists 142 properties. A Cultural Heritage Landscape Inventory Thanks to this longstanding commitment, today more than 95 per- established this year includes 26 sites to date. cent of the town's pre-1939 building stock still stands. In Grimsby, heritage planning is integrated into the Offi- Beginning with the conversion of a former blacksmith shop cial Plan. Its vision states that "Grimsby's future will build on (c.1800) into the first Grimsby Museum in 1963, the Town has its small town scenic character" and that "Grimsby's natural IN THIS ISSUE

Grimbsy Wins the 2015 Prince of 1 Community Heritage Ontario 8 News from CHO/PCO Board of 11 Wales Prize Service Award 2016 Directors Ontario News from the National 2 President’s Message 9 Advertise in CHOnews 11 Trust for Canada CHO/PCO Mission Statement 10 Who is your Heritage Hero? 12 A Temple to Truth, Justice, 3 We want to hear from you 10 Ontario Heritage Conference 2016 12 Simplicity, and Peace CHOnews Deadlines 10 Disclaimer 12 The Case for 24 Sussex Drive 4 Strategic Plan Survey 10 Tick, Tock, What About That Clock? 5 CHO/PCO Board Meetings 10 Postscript: Vineland Public School 7 1895 to 2015 CHO/PCO Board of Directors 11 www.communityheritageontario.ca

Winter / hiver 2016 CHOnews 1

Page 81 of 92 Agenda Item # 6.2

 Residential Conversion/Intensification Grant: Provides a It was a winning night for the Town of Grimsby. A Grimsby grant equal to 50% of the cost of rehabilitation existing residen- student attending Carleton University, Sara Nixon, created a tial units, up to a maximum of $75,000. smart phone App, "Grimsby Timescapes," that provides infor- In addition, several zoning by-laws protect the town's historic mation about heritage buildings in Grimsby. She received the character and ensure the sensitive integration of new developments within the historic context. Herb Stovel Scholarship. A Grimsby heritage practitioner, The residents of Grimsby celebrate their community's her- Philip Hoad, was recognized by the Canadian Association of itage, enthusiastically participating in the annual Doors Open Heritage Professionals for his work, along with a team of Grimsby Festival, historic walking tours and the Grimsby Her- heritage professionals, on the restoration of the Basilica of itage Art Contest. This enthusiasm demonstrates how powerfully heritage connects citizens to their town. Our Lady in Guelph. The jury was unanimous in its selection of this impressive nomination, calling Grimsby's approach to heritage conservation heritage, cultural heritage and arts will be celebrated and pro- "proactive" and "sophisticated." tected." Few communities in Canada have a conservation movement To demonstrate this commitment, Grimsby, in partnership with that is so long standing as it is in Grimsby, and this pretty little the Region of Niagara, has implemented a robust suite of policies town in Niagara West certainly shows the benefits of following and programs aimed at promoting heritage conservation. Finan- this path. Grimsby is a livable, desirable, and prosperous commu- cial measures include: nity with a precious legacy of beautifully preserved heritage  Designated Property Grant Program: Provides grants up buildings, neighbourhoods, and landscapes. Like others who have to $30,000 for heritage-designated commercial property and received this prestigious award, The Prince of Wales Prize is a $10,000 for heritage-designated residential property for façade welcome recognition of the efforts of generations past, and an improvement projects. inspiration for those who follow.  Downtown Grimsby Façade Improvement Grants up to The Prince of Wales Prize was presented in October 2015 to $20,000 for façade improvements. Mayor Bob Bentley and long time heritage advisory committee  Downtown Grimsby Property Rehabilitation and Rede- member, Alderman Nick Diflavio, at the National Trust for Cana- velopment Tax Increment Rebate: Owners who complete property da's annual conference in Calgary. rehabilitation projects are eligible for reimbursement in the form of an annual grant equivalent to 70% of the resulting municipal Michael Seaman is the Director of Planning for the Town tax increment for up to 10 years of Grimsby. Ontario News from The National Trust for Canada

Awards Recipients  Trinity-St. Paul's United Church projects posted to the site, make a contri- Sanctuary, Toronto, ERA Architects Inc., bution, or submit a project, Canadians are The National Trust for Tafelmusik Baroque Orchestra and Cham- invited to visit thisplacematters.ca. Canada congratulates ber Choir and Trinity-St. Paul's United the recipients of its Church New Board of Governors Member 2015 National Heritage Awards for out-  Sir John A. Macdonald Building, for Ontario standing contributions in their fields. Can- Ottawa, Public Works Government Ser- didates for The Prince of Wales Prize, the vices Canada, MTBA Associates Inc. and The National Trust for Canada is Leadership Awards, and the Ecclesiastical NORR Architect, Engineers, Planners pleased to announce that Michael Seaman Insurance Cornerstone Awards were for- has joined its Board of Governors to rep- mally nominated by Canadians from New Crowdfunding Opportunity resent Ontario. Michael is the Director of across the country. The Town of Grimsby Planning for the Town of Grimsby, is the recipient of the prestigious Prince of THIS PLACE MATTERS is an excit- Ontario. With more than 25 years of expe- Wales Prize for Municipal Heritage Lead- ing tool that will help organizations rience in urban and heritage planning, he ership. The following are the Ontario embrace the power of social media, reach brings knowledge, insight, and enthusiasm recipients of the Ecclesiastical Insurance new audiences, and raise funds. It is for conserving and sensitively reusing her- Cornerstone Awards for Building Her- designed with heritage places in mind and itage resources in ways that improve qual- itage: offers resources to help project teams plan ity of life. He is currently heritage editor  Market Street Development, and executive an effective crowdfunding for Ontario Planning Journal and a facul- Toronto, Taylor Smyth Architects and campaign. Thanks to our Founding Part- ty associate with Willowbank School of Woodcliffe Landmark Properties ner, the RBC Foundation, the National Restoration Arts.  New Learning Centre, Building Trust for Canada is offering a special For further information contact Car- 94, Central Experimental Farm, Ottawa, opportunity to boost contributions made to olyn Quinn, Director of Communications, GRC Architects Inc. and the Canada Agri- the site and help project teams reach their The National Trust for Canada, culture and Food Museum crowdfunding goals. We will match 50 [email protected], 613 237  The London Roundhouse, Lon- cents on the dollar, for the first $25,000 1066 ext. 229; mobile 613 797 7206. don, Creative Property Developments contributed through the site. To explore

2 CHOnews Winter / hiver 2016

Page 82 of 92 Agenda Item # 6.2

A Temple to Truth, Justice, Simplicity, and Peace

Mike Sawchuck n a warm and sunny afternoon in early October 2015, Oonlookers gathered to witness an official key transfer ceremony for a significant cultural heritage property in the Town of Ajax. In the presence of all members of Council, ownership of the former Quaker Meeting House, built in 1867, was symbolically transferred to the Town from the Freemasonry body that had been its capable steward for more than seventy years. The occasion marked an important event in the building's nearly 150 year history and signified the Town's ongoing commitment to the preservation of its heritage landmarks and landscapes. The former Quaker Meeting House, located on the fringe of historic Pickering Village at the intersection of Kingston Road and Mill Street, has a long history connected to many of the area's earliest and most influential residents. The land was acquired in 1808 by Timothy Rogers, as part of an 800 acre parcel. Rogers was a faithful member of the Religious Society of Friends (commonly known as Quakers) and made it his Representatives from the Town of Ajax receive the keys to the building from representatives of Doric Lodge No. 424, October 8, 2015. life's mission to settle Quaker colonies across the United States Photo: Town of Ajax and Canada. In 1814, he donated seven acres for use as a Quaker Meeting House and the creation of a community ceme- village of Newmarket, where the school continues to operate tery. The first Meeting House was built about 1819 but was today. replaced by a two storey, frame structure about 1833. The pre- Less than three years after the fire, on a stormy summer's sent red brick structure was completed in 1867 and opened on night, Pickering residents were awakened by the sound of the vil- June 28, 1867, with the first Independent Yearly Meeting of lage fire alarm. Those who converged on the scene witnessed an Friends in Canada. illuminated night sky, as flames burst from the roof of the Quaker Pickering Village continued to grow through the latter half of Meeting House. The fire reduced the building to its masonry the 19th century, with new Quaker residents settling in the com- walls, but unlike years earlier with the College, the community munity from other areas of Canada, the United States, and abroad. decided to rebuild within the damaged shell. Quakers used the In 1878, the Quakers opened a new educational facility, Pickering Meeting House until their population declined and the building College, in proximity to the Meeting House, further emphasizing fell into disuse in the early 20th century. Following a decade of the religious roots of the community. use by other religious denominations, in 1943 it was purchased by On December 30, 1905, a catastrophic fire broke out in the the local Freemasonry Lodge to accommodate its growing mem- College, the first of a series of unfortunate events that would bership. eventually take a toll on the size and strength of the Quaker This building is architecturally significant for its simple community in the area. Rather than rebuild the College on its American Classical Revival features, its symmetry, and its existing site, a decision was made to open a new school in the atypical design when compared to other Ontario Quaker Meet- ing Houses. Its design provides for a very tall volume of space, which differs from the traditional, single storey, frame construction of other Meeting Houses of the same period. This unique design reflects the stature and resourcefulness of the Pickering Quaker community. The large, central front door provides a focal point around which the building's symmetry revolves and suggests the building's importance as a centre of community life. The detailed but unadorned common bond brickwork of the exterior walls, the simple free laid stone foundation, and the symmetrically placed, round headed window openings, evoke the restraint, solidity, and dignity of the Quak- er way of life. The building is one of a few Quaker Meeting Houses remaining in the province and provides a strong physi- cal connection to the role played by the Quakers in the origins of Pickering Village. The Town of Ajax will continue the tradition of community uses within this important structure. It will continue to operate as a Masonic Lodge and will offer rental space for meetings, as well as neighbourhood programming for local residents. Town Quaker Meeting House, looking south from Kingston Road. Photo: Town of Ajax Council has approved a restoration plan which anticipates all

Winter / hiver 2015 CHOnews 3

Page 83 of 92 Agenda Item # 6.2

work will be completed by the fall of 2017 to mark the 150th anniversary of its construction and of Canada's Confederation. Following completion of this work, Ajax Heritage Advisory Committee will pursue designation of the property under the Ontario Heritage Act.

Mike Sawchuck is a Senior Planner at the Town of Ajax and staff liaison to the Ajax Heritage Advisory Committee.

Quakers gathering outside the Meeting House, no date. Photo: Ajax Archives The Case for 24 Sussex Drive

Leslie Maitland arely had the dust settled from the goldfish bowl. Not many Canadians public building. Our 24 Sussex is quite BOctober 19, 2015 federal election would begrudge them a decent goldfish unlike the White House in Washington when the question of the Prime Minister's bowl for all that they do. Besides, it is or 10 Downing Street in London. It was residence, 24 Sussex Drive, came up. The not any particular Prime Minister's never intended for large public func- ensuing discussion in the media from house. It's ours. tions, nor was it intended to house the coast to coast raised interest in heritage It is tempting to consider starting executive, as do the other two official conservation the way few topics ever over with a fresh slate. Maureen McTeer, residences. In Ottawa, large national have. wife of former Prime Minister Joe Clark, events are held at Rideau Hall, the Gov- The residence at 24 Sussex is in rough advocated ripping the building down as a ernor General's residence, and the execu- shape. The house has not had a proper cheaper alternative and replacing it with tive is downtown in the Langevin Block. upgrade since it was purchased by the fed- an architectural showpiece. This option No. 24 Sussex is very much a family eral government in 1949 as a residence for has a satisfying note of finality to it, but home, with some capacity for only small the Prime Minister (until that date, Prime does not hold up to scrutiny. Demolition scale receptions. Ministers had lived in various accommo- and building new is not necessarily The reasons to renovate are over- dations around the city of Ottawa). The cheaper: there would need to be a whelming. This is a Classified Federal house was built in 1867-68 for wealthy national competition, a jury empanelled Heritage Building with its importance and socially prominent Ottawa lumber and compensated. How choice are the based upon its historical associations, baron J.M. Currier, and his third wife. The materials you want to use? It can start to exterior design, and its breathtaking loca- house was a great Victorian pile with a add up. tion on the cliffs overlooking the Ottawa richly decorated façade and interior. This Either way, there will have to be an River. It is part of a suite of closely sited was hardly to the tastes of the 1950s, and investment for a structure that is not a buildings which speak to the foundations so Public Works toned down the exterior and interior to its present appearance, a handsome and picturesque, stone house on an amazing site. Since then, 24 Sussex has housed every Prime Minister, giving it a long association with our nation's history. Unfortunately, not much else has been done since 1950: there is no fire suppres- sion system, there is asbestos, the wiring, heating, and plumbing all need to be updated. How did it get this bad? The National Capital Commission, which is responsible for the maintenance of official residences in Ottawa, cannot be faulted. Over the years, the tenants just did not want to move out to get the work done and the NCC could not force the issue. Former Prime Minister Stephen Harper did not want to be seen spending federal money on something that was chiefly of 24 Sussex Drive benefit to himself. But, the Prime Minis- Photo: National Capital Commission ter and his family work hard and live in a

4 CHOnews Winter / hiver 2016

Page 84 of 92 Agenda Item # 6.2

of Canada's democracy: Rideau Hall is ask. There are ways around that, too. Yes, of the United States, across the street across the street; down the street is Earn- the Prime Minister deserves a place of pri- from the Parliament Buildings, has been scliffe, the home of Sir John A. Macdon- vacy and retreat. Perhaps the residence standing derelict for years, ever since the ald while he was Prime Minister; and it is could be opened to the public once a year Harper government canned the idea of within sight of the Parliament Buildings. during Doors Open, as many ambassador- installing the National Portrait Gallery in No. 24 Sussex is already a showpiece of ial residences and even the US Embassy the building. The Harper Government Canadian history. are now. Perhaps its restoration could be a also proposed to chop off a piece of the This is also an excellent opportunity to sesquicentennial project: open the doors Central Experimental Farm National showcase "green" heritage conservation. for a few months during the 150th Historic Site to subsidize a new munici- While upgrading all the systems, this is anniversary party, before closing the doors pal hospital. the time to install geothermal heating and for private use again. For now, Prime Canadians should know that there is cooling and other "green" technologies. Minister Trudeau and his young family no legislative protection for national his- Many heritage conservation projects are are sensibly housed at Rideau Cottage, a toric sites or for federally owned heritage now winning LEED certification. Do we former staff house on the grounds of properties, so we would be naïve to think really want to send a designated heritage Rideau Hall, recently renovated, secure, our heritage properties are secure. We building to landfill? The greenest building and close to the family's former neigh- should do better. is the one that is already there and left bourhood. standing. Sad to say, but 24 Sussex is not the Leslie Maitland is a member of What a lot of expense for a building only neglected, federally owned heritage Heritage Ottawa. few Canadians will ever visit, you might building in Ottawa. The former Embassy Tick, Tock, What About That Clock?

Paul R. King he Superior Court of Justice recently released the decision Tby the Honourable Justice D.R. Aston in the case of Foley v The Corporation of the Town of St. Marys, 2015 ONSC 6214 (CanLII) (ontariocourts.ca/search-canlii/scj/scj-en.htm). This relates to the designation of the Andrews Jeweller property in St. Marys. There are two lessons to be learned about the Ontario Her- itage Act from this decision, one dealing with notice requirements and the other dealing with the distinction between fixtures and chattels.

Notice Requirements When notifying an owner that a property is about to be designated under s. 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, it is important to check and double check the notice information. In the case of the Notice of Intention to Designate sent by the Town of St. Marys to the Foleys, one of the numbers in the postal code for the Foley's address in London was incorrect, an easy mistake. This error gave the Foleys a window of opportunity to argue that they did not receive notice of the impending designation. They argued that, due to the lack of notice, the designating bylaw (passed several years earlier) should, therefore, be declared void. This error was minor, and at the end of the day, Justice Ashton decided as follows: The [Foleys] acknowledged . . . that they were aware from the notice published in the newspaper of the municipality's intent to pass the by-law designating the property prior to the adoption of that by-law. Moreover, the [Foleys] . . . had already advised the municipality in prior discussions that they were fully aware of the municipality's intention to pass a designating by-law and though they were not consenting to such a by-law, they would not be participating in the by-law process. . . . An owner who had actual Andrews Jeweller Building shortly after construction in 1885. notice of an intended designating by-law and its particulars Photo: St. Marys Museum (notwithstanding that notice was not strictly in accordance with [the requirements in the Ontario Heritage Act] should not be able prerequisite to the power or jurisdiction of the municipality. I find to rely on lack of notice to quash the by-law. Notice inadequately that the failure to strictly comply with [the requirements in the given may nevertheless have been actually received. It follows Act] may render a designating by-law voidable but it does not that a technically defective notice is an irregularity rather than a render it void ab initio.

Winter / hiver 2016 CHOnews 5

Page 85 of 92 Agenda Item # 6.2

Nevertheless, this inadvertent error was part of the basis of a legal proceeding that was costly and time consuming for both parties.

Fixtures vs. Chattels Under Part IV of the Act, it is possible to include interior features of a building (in addition to external features) in the designation statement. (This is not the same for Part V (Heritage Con- servation Districts) designations which only deal with the exteri- or.) For the Andrews Jeweller building in St. Marys, all the original interior features from 1884, including a wall clock, walnut showcases, counters, and mirrors, were included in the designation statement. All of these items could be easily detached from the building and removed. The Foleys argued that the designation bylaw should either be quashed or, alternatively, amended to delete the wall clock, walnut showcases, counters, and mirrors. They reasoned that the designation included "chattels" in addition Interior of the Andrews Jeweller Building showing new electric lights to "fixtures." and cabinetry. Photo: St. Marys Museum

real property as to be intended as an improvement to the real property and to pass with it. In other words, it becomes part of the real property. An example would be kitchen cabinets. If an object is integral to the real estate, even if it is not firmly attached, it may still be a fixture. For example, a hinged door is affixed, with the intention of improving the property. A "chattel" is an object attached only with the purpose of temporary use or ornament so as to be removable. For example, a painting hanging by a hook is a chattel. There are, however, examples where the distinction between a fixture and a chattel is blurred. Justice Ashton accepted the submission of counsel for the Foleys that the jurisdiction and authori- ty of a municipality under Part IV is limited to real property, including fixtures, and does not include chattels. In the case of the Andrews Jeweller building, he ruled: Though easily removed, the clock is in fact affixed to the wall. It loses its characterization as a chattel if there is evidence to show it was affixed with the purpose or intention of improving the premises as a whole. The evidence here establishes that the clock was designed for the jewellery store at the same time as the counters and cabinets, or shortly thereafter. I find that the ornate appearance and craftsmanship of the clock seem specifically designed to complement the rest of the décor, in particular the walnut and glass cabinets and counters. . . . On balance, I find the wall clock is a fixture in the context of the Ontario Her- itage Act. . . . For similar reasons, the cabinets, counters, showcases and mirrors are also fixtures. . . . They were designed and installed for the express purpose of attracting customers and selling jewelry through an enhancement of the realty. . . . They were used for that purpose and never moved again in over 100 years. The lesson here is to be careful about drafting designating bylaws so that they designate real estate and not chattels. There is, however, not always a clear distinction between fixtures and chattels, which explains the considerable volume of case law dealing The wall clock mentioned in the bylaw. with this subject. Details matter, so be very specific with the Photo: St. Marys Museum wording of designation statements.

So what is the distinction between fixtures and chattels? It Paul R. King is a member of the CHO/PCO Board of is not always easy to tell and there is plenty of case law dealing Directors. with the distinction. A "fixture" is a chattel so attached to the

6 CHOnews Winter / hiver 2016

Page 86 of 92 Agenda Item # 6.2

Postscript: Vineland Public School 1895 to 2015

Carla Mackie fter 120 years of continuous use as ion any deviations from committee recom- heritage designation, which are separate Aa classroom, Vineland's school- mendations. processes under the Act. It should never house was demolished in thirty minutes on 3. The Ontario government needs to again be the case that the Minister defers to July 21, 2015, by the District School Board create an appeal process for concerned par- municipalities on a provincial heritage des- of Niagara. There is a dramatic video of the ties when municipalities fail to designate ignation application. demolition posted online (vps1895.ca). The valuable heritage properties. Leave to 7. The Ontario government should cre- schoolhouse more than satisfied every crite- appeal to the Ontario Municipal Board in ate a process for review and appeal of Min- rion for designation as a municipal and a such cases, which was eliminated in the isterial decisions on provincial heritage sta- provincial heritage property under the 2005 revision of the OHA, should be tus. There is no appeal process when the Ontario Heritage Act. restored or an alternative appeal process Minister fails to act on a provincial heritage Over 1,800 paper petitioners, 1,400 should be created. designation request. Clear criteria have Facebook supporters, 600 signatories at 4. Provisions should be added to the been established for provincial heritage des- Change.org, and 50 passionate letter writers OHA to ensure that any damage to desig- ignation. Nevertheless, the process by supported the efforts by Friends of Vineland nated heritage properties must be compen- which the Minister considers such requests Public School 1895 to save this key piece sated for with appropriate remediation and is entirely opaque and subject to the arbi- of Lincoln's built heritage. restoration work. In short, the OHA should trary discretion of the Minister. Once a The District School Board of Niagara be given the same teeth as similar environ- decision is rendered, there appears to be no refused to change its plans to replace the mental legislation. review process in response to either a posi- schoolhouse with three parking spots. Suc- 5. The OHA should be revised to man- tive or negative decision. cessive Lincoln mayors and Town Councils date coordination amongst public bodies on We hope that these recommendations (2010 to 2014, 2015 to 2019) failed to exer- the heritage status of all public buildings, will feature in Ontario's new cultural strate- cise any leadership to save this landmark. with a particular emphasis on those older gy and in the government's work program The Town aided the DSBN in fighting legal than 100 years. Ontario law and policy for the year ahead. We know from Toronto's efforts to prevent the schoolhouse's destruc- should mandate that all public buildings of St Lawrence Market to Ottawa's major tion. The Ontario Minister and Ministry of potential heritage value should be subjected tourist sites and onward to Niagara-on-the- Tourism, Culture, and Sport stood aside and to a heritage review process prior to any Lake, Jordan, Elora, St Jacobs, Kingston, did nothing. decision to sell, alter, or demolish them. For and other towns across Ontario that preser- Ontario's heritage designation process is instance, Accommodation Review process- vation of built heritage makes a significant broken. Both the municipal and provincial es run by local school boards should be contribution to Ontario's social and eco- designation processes and the Ontario Her- required to participate in a municipal or nomic wellbeing. It is time to make itage Act (OHA), on which they are found- provincial heritage review prior to a deci- Ontario's efforts and structures to protect its ed, require substantial overhauls. Based on sion to close, renovate, or destroy a historic built heritage more strategic and effective, our experience trying to save Vineland's last school building. and less ad hoc and arbitrary. public heritage building, we submitted the 6. The Ontario Attorney General's office following recommendations to Ontario's should provide clarifying guidance for the Carla Mackie is with Friends of Culture Strategy, underway as talks toward Minister of Tourism, Culture, and Sport and Vineland Public School 1895 and is strengthening Ontario's approach to protect- Ministry officials on the distinct application Chair of the Town of Lincoln Municipal ing its built heritage. of the OHA for municipal and provincial Heritage Committee. 1. The Ontario Ministry of Tourism, Culture, and Sport (MTCS) should under- take a public audit and stocktaking of heritage policies, strategies, processes, and reg- istries in Ontario's 444 municipalities to assess the current state of Ontario's municipal heritage designation institutional infra- structure. Once a clear picture of deficien- cies has been created, remedial action should be taken by the MTCS to ensure municipalities plug these holes. 2. Stronger expectations on municipalities for robust heritage designation systems should be written into an amended OHA. The OHA should compel municipalities to create, operate, and maintain these systems. The OHA should also compel municipalities to take proper account of the counsel provided by their municipal heritage committees and to justify in a transparent fash-

Winter / hiver 2016 CHOnews 7

Page 87 of 92 Agenda Item # 6.2

Community Heritage Ontario Service Awards 2016

Community Heritage Ontario is pleased to present the 1st Annual Heritage Service Awards. The CHO/PCO Board of Directors invites nominations for 2 awards to be presented at the Ontario Her- itage Conference in Stratford/St. Marys, May 12 -15, 2016.

One award is given annually to an individual in each category

1. Service to CHO - members are encouraged to submit the names of CHO members who have provided a minimum of 5 years of service to CHO; have shown leadership in CHO; have furthered the cause of heritage in Ontario.

2. Service to Municipal Heritage Committees who are members of CHO - members are encouraged to submit the names of members of their Municipal Heritage Committee (MHC) who have provided a minimum of 5 years of service to their MHC; have shown leadership in the MHC; have furthered the cause of heritage in their local community. The MHC must be a member in good standing with CHO.

The nominator must submit the following: Category of Nomination Name and Contact Information of Nominee Number of Years of Service Contributions made in the nominating category Name and Contact Information of the Nominating Member(s) or Municipal Heritage Committee

Standing CHO/PCO Board Members are not eligible for an award.

Please send your nomination to: Community Heritage Ontario 24 Conlins Road Scarborough, ON M1C 1C3 or by email [email protected]

Deadline for Nominations is Thursday, March 24, 2016

8 CHOnews Winter / hiver 2016

Page 88 of 92 Agenda Item # 6.2

President's Message

Wayne Morgan ire! How often have you sought to resource once stood, and considering what Fconserve a heritage resource only should go in its place. Municipal heritage to see it literally go up in flames? It hap- committees do have a role to play in pre- pens all too often, especially when build- venting the destruction of heritage ings are left vacant. I know that I have resources by fire. Review your municipal worked for years to conserve heritage bylaws dealing with vacant buildings. buildings only to see them destroyed by Ensure that there are sufficient measures fire. These photographs show a property in to prevent unauthorized entry. Boarding Brampton where I was called in after the up of a vacant building is the first step, building had been destroyed. On others, I but it is not sufficient. I have been to have worked for years documenting the buildings which appear to be boarded only resource, working with the owner to devel- to find an entry, out of site from the pub- op plans to conserve the resource, only to lic, that has been opened and all wood- see it totally destroyed. Not only is there a work has been stripped out of the house. sense of loss for the community, but such Locked, tall fencing around the vacant events are personally discouraging. building is another additional measure. Leah Wallace of Niagara-on-the-Lake Snow fences just don't cut it when it has a good article in the Jan/Feb 2015 edi- comes to protection. Active alarm systems Finally, develop a rapport with your tion of the Ontario Planning Journal (this are another measure that can be required, fire chief. Sometimes a burned building issue of the Journal is posted at communi- even if electricity has been removed from can be salvaged or the ruins would be a tyheritageontario.ca) about rebuilding the building, they can still be installed. good heritage resource if made safe for after a fire. Do you recreate what was Finally, frequent monitoring of the site the public. But those options vanish if the lost? Or do you build something new, of can be required to ensure vacant buildings chief orders the remains leveled immedi- its time? Or is it some combination? remain secure. Having reviewed your ately following the fire. But how can we avoid getting to this municipal bylaw, advise your Council on Perhaps you have additional ideas on decision point, where we are looking at a changes that should be made to tighten up this issue. Let us know so we can let other hole in the ground where an important the requirements. municipal heritage committees know.

u feu ! Combien de fois avons- Mais comment pouvons-nous éviter ce paux sur le patrimoine ont un rôle à jouer Anous chercher à conserver une point tournant où nous regardons un trou dans la prévention de la destruction par le ressource patrimoniale juste pour la voir là où était une ressource important et feu des ressources patrimoniales. Réviser partir en feu? Ceci arrive trop souvent, devons prendre une décision sur ce qui vos règlements municipaux en matière de particulièrement lorsque les bâtiments devra la remplacer. Les comités munici- propriétés vacantes. Assurez-vous qu'il y sont laissés vacants. Je sais que j'ai tra- vaillé pendant des années pour conserver des structures patrimoniales qui ont été détruites par le feu. Les photos ci-jointes montrent une propriété à Brampton pour laquelle j'ai été appelé après sa destruction. Pour d'autres, j'ai travaillé pendant des années pour documenter la propriété, travaillant avec le propriétaire pour développer des plans pour la conservation, juste pour la voir totalement détruite. Non seulement un sens de perte pour la com- munauté, mais de tels évènements sont personnellement décourageant. Leah Wallace de Niagara-on-the-Lake a un bon article dans l'édition de jan/fév 2015 du Ontario Planning Journal (cet édition se trouve sur notre site web communityheritageontario.ca) sur la recon- struction après un feu. Doit-on recréer ce qui a été perdu ? Ou bâtir quelque chose Carefoot/Fitzpatrick House, May 2011. Maison Carefoot/Fitzpatrick, Mai 2011. de neuf, en dehors de son temps ? Ou un Photo: City of Brampton mélange des deux ?

Winter / hiver 2016 CHOnews 9

Page 89 of 92 Agenda Item # 6.2

est suffisamment de mesure pour prévenir lorsqu'on parle de protection. Un système Finalement, développé un rapport pour les entrées non autorisées. Barricader les d'alarme actif est une autre mesure qui votre chef pompier. Quelque fois un édi- édifices vacants est un premier pas, mais peut être nécessaire, même si l'électricité a fice incendié peut être récupéré ou les ce n'est pas suffisant. Je suis allé dans des été enlevé, il peut être installé. Finale- ruines pourraient être une ressource si édifices qui semblaient barricader simple- ment, la surveillance périodique du site mise disponible au publique. Cependant ment pour trouver une autre entrée, hors peut être requise pour s'assurer que la pro- ces options disparaissent si le chef de vue du publique, une ouverture et priété vacante demeure sécure. Après révi- ordonne le site nivelé après le feu. toutes les boiseries arrachées de la mai- sion des règlements municipaux, avisé Peut-être avez-vous des idées addi- son. Une clôture haute et barrée, autour votre conseil municipal des changements tionnelles sur le sujet. Laissez-nous savoir d'une propriété, est une mesure addition- qui pourraient être fait pour resserrer les et nous partagerons avec les autres nelle. La clôture à neige ne suffit pas exigences. comités municipaux.

Carefoot/Fitzpatrick House burning, July 9, 2012. The remains of the Carefoot/Fitzpatrick House, October 2012. La maison Carefoot / Fitzpatrick qui brule, 9 juillet, 2012. Les restes de la maison Carefoot/Fitzpatrick, octobre 2012. Photo: CBC News website Photo: Wayne Morgan

CHO/PCO Mission We Want to CHOnews Deadlines Statement Hear From You CHOnews is YOUR quarterly CHOnews issues are Spring, To encourage the development Summer, Fall, and Winter. The publication. We want to know of municipally appointed heritage deadlines for submission are as about the initiatives, achievements, follows: advisory committees and to further challenges, and concerns of your March 10 (Spring issue) the identification, preservation, Municipal Heritage Committee.  June 10 (Summer issue) interpretation, and wise use of Information networking through  October 10 (Fall issue) community heritage locally, CHOnews is important. Submis-  December 10 (Winter issue) provincially, and nationally. sions are welcome at any time. Submissions are always welcomed.

Strategic Plan Survey CHO/PCO Board Meetings

Community Heritage Ontario wants to know what is CHO/PCO Board of Directors' meetings are open important to you and your municipal heritage committee. Please take the time to complete our online survey to any MHC member. Please contact the Corporate at: surveymonkey.com/r/CHO-PCO. As CHO rolls Secretary to confirm each date before attending. into the new Strategic Plan for 2015 to 2020, we want to Scheduled meetings will be held at 6282 Kingston ensure that we are providing the services you need to make heritage a priority in your community. Road, Scarborough.

10 CHOnews Winter / hiver 2016

Page 90 of 92 Agenda Item # 6.2

CHO/PCO Board of Directors 2015-2016

EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Chair of Finance Tom Millar Etobicoke 416.233.8520 President Paul R. King [email protected] Wayne Morgan St. Marys 416.274.4686 CORPORATE SECRETARY/ Sutton West 905.722.5398 [email protected] TREASURER waynemorgan@ communityheritageontario.ca DIRECTORS Rick Schofield

Vice-Presidents Bob Martindale Scarborough 416.282.2710 Ajax 905.683.8703 Tracy Gayda [email protected] Toledo 613.275.2117 bobmartindale@ tracygayda@ communityheritageontario.ca PAST PRESIDENT communityheritageontario.ca Chelsey Fedechenko Roscoe Petkovic Ginette Guy Oakville Halton Hills 905.877.4586 Cornwall 613.363.5312 chelseyfedechenko@ roscoepetkovic@ [email protected] communityheritageontario.ca communityheritageontario.ca

News from the CHO/PCO Board of Directors Advertise in CHOnews! he CHO/PCO Board of Directors For the benefit of major libraries and Tmet on November 22, 2015, in for CHO/PCO members who want a set, Reach a province-wide readership Scarborough, to conduct its usual business. the Board again approved the binding of composed of all Municipal Heritage The Corporate Secretary reported that back issues of CHOnews into a hardcover Committee members, heritage societies, membership for 2015 stands at 121 Munic- book format. This was done for the years municipal officials, and heritage con- ipal Heritage Committees/Groups, with a 1991-2000 and only two bound copies scious individuals! total membership base of 922 individuals. remain available for sale. The next bound DISPLAY ADS must be supplied CHO/PCO received the annual grant set will cover the years 2001-2010 and will in camera-ready tiff or pdf format. from the Ministry of Tourism, Culture and be available for purchase early in 2016. Sport, and acknowledged this ongoing Cost will likely be around $25 to $30. Location of ads is at the discretion of financial support. With reduced printing Please contact the Corporate Secretary if the Editor. Cost is per issue: and postage expenditures as a result of you are interested in obtaining a bound set. Full Page $300 sending an electronic version of CHO/PCO is always looking for new Half Page $150 CHOnews to those who have made that members to serve on the Board of Direc- request, the Corporation will balance its tors and its committees. Although the next Third Page $100 budget for 2015. annual general meeting will not be until Quarter Page $75 The Board approved a letter outlining May 2016 in Stratford/St. Marys, now is One Sixth 5”x 2.6” $50 CHO/PCO's concern about the future of the the time to consider joining the Board or a Business Card $25 historic property at 24 Sussex Drive in committee and adding your knowledge Ottawa (the official residence of the Prime and experience to this provincial heritage CLASSIFIED ADS: $12.00 per column Minister), urging "the federal government to organization. The Board meets quarterly, inch develop a program of restoration to conserve usually on the fourth Sunday of Septem- To place an ad in CHOnews, please the character defining attributes, both exteri- ber, November, March, and May/June in contact Rick Schofield at or and interior, of this heritage resource." Scarborough. Travel expenses are paid, as The Conference Committee reported well as accommodation for those coming 416.282.2710 that there is declining interest in holding to a Board meeting from a long distance. [email protected] the annual Ontario Heritage Conference in Various committees are formed (Commu- Toronto in 2017. Efforts have switched to nications, Conference, Education, etc.) attempting to hold the conference in and conduct their business by teleconfer- Ottawa, which will be celebrating its ence calls. Please drop us a note if you are Sesquicentennial that year. interested.

Winter / hiver 2016 CHOnews 11

Page 91 of 92 Agenda Item # 6.2

Media panel certain to look at monetizing heritage, and shared public spaces

When it comes to effectively using conventional and social media to save historical buildings and sites, advocates would do well to focus on "something like monetizing CHOnews heritage." is published quarterly by So says Christopher Hume, who will make that point as a member of the media Community Heritage Ontario. panel at the Ontario Heritage Conference in Stratford and St. Marys, May 12-14, 2016. Additional copies of CHOnews are Hume is the architecture critic and urban issues columnist for the Toronto Star. available from Rick Schofield at the He will be urging the panelists and delegates to "talk to people like the developers corporate mailing address or by who did the Distillery District and the Flatiron Building (both in Toronto), and to the calling 416.282.2710. dozens who have made heritage a huge economic asset." As well, he adds, they cannot ignore the tax incentives that could encourage preservation and re-use. Submission Deadlines "Currently, there's Old City Hall in Toronto," says Hume, "which consultants sug- March 10, June 10, October 10, and gested should be turned into a shopping mall. If that doesn't raise the hackles of the December 10 heritage movement what does?" Also on the OHC panel next spring will be Romayne Smith-Fullerton, long-time The financial support of the Ministry of professor in the Faculty of Information and Media Studies at Western University. Tourism, Culture and Sport is gratefully "Check any news story about preservation-be it a building, a streetscape, or a piece acknowledged. of natural landscape, " she says, "and you'll also see feedback from those who say, 'out with the old and in with the new.' But if we don't commit to remembering our past, we Corporate Address are in real danger of forgetting from where we've come. Why does it matter? Because CHO, 24 Conlins Road, buildings and streetscapes and landscapes offer us the actual space, a shared public Scarborough, ON M1C 1C3 space, where we can touch and feel and experience that past. It's an experiential thing www.communityheritageontario.ca [email protected] that can't be duplicated, and needs to be valued. "Communities today are about creating shared spaces where all of us can come together to think about where we live, how we live, and how best we can foster ties." Let’s hear from you! Send your More than 300 delegates are expected to attend the conference, sponsored by the news and comments to the Editor Architectural Conservancy of Ontario and Community Heritage Ontario. The local for publication in CHOnews. planning committee includes members from Community Heritage Ontario, the Strat- ford-Perth branch of the ACO, the St. Marys Heritage Committee, the Stratford Her- Articles should be in Word format. itage Committee, the Stratford Tourism Images should be sent as .jpg Alliance, the Town of St. Marys, the City attachments in high quality resolution The conference website will be (300 dpi). Do not embed the images of Stratford and others. launched in January 2016 with in the text of the article. Captions and credits need to be provided. For more information, contact Dean registration opening in February. Robinson, at [email protected]. www.ontarioheritageconference.ca Newspaper articles as updates to Municipal Heritage Committee activi- ties cannot be used without permis- Who is your Heritage Disclaimer sion of the newspaper and/or the Hero? original author. Text written by the The content of CHOnews does MHC is encouraged. not contain nor reflect any opin- CHOnews wants you to share ion, position, or influence of the Articles are published in the language your personal heritage anecdotes they are received. CHO/PCO Board of Directors or or stories of your inspirational the Editor of CHOnews. Submis- Editor and Technical Production by heritage heroes. Submit 500 to Celia Laur. Contact at Corporate sions received for publication in 1,000 words with photographs or Address above. CHOnews are changed only for illustrations (jpg file format, high purposes of legibility and accura- CHO/PCO is on Facebook. resolution) and captions to tracy- cy to the extent that can be readily gayda@communityheritageon- ISSN 1201 - 9852 determined. tario.ca

12 CHOnews Winter / hiver 2016

Page 92 of 92