DOCSLIB.ORG

Update of the Water Control Manual

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Update of the Water Control Manual 91154 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 242 / Friday, December 16, 2016 / Notices ADDRESSES section of this notice. Before Jim Woodruff Lock and Dam and Lake total of 705 mgd to a range of 597–621 including your address, phone number, Seminole. mgd—242 mgd from Lake Lanier email address, or any other personal The purpose and need for the federal (instead of 297 mgd) and 355–379 mgd identifying information in your action is to determine how federal downstream (instead of 408 mgd)— comment, you should be aware that projects in the ACF Basin should be through the year 2050 rather than 2040 your entire comment—including your operated for their authorized purposes, as specified in the 2013 request. personal identifying information—may in light of current conditions and USACE’s objectives for the Master be made available to the public at any applicable law, and to implement those Manual are to develop a water control time. While you can request us to operations through updated water plan that meets the existing water withhold your personal identifying control plans and manuals. The resource needs of the basin, fulfills its information from public review, we proposed action will result in an responsibilities in operating for the cannot guarantee that we will be able to updated Master Manual and individual authorized project purposes, and do so. project water control manuals (WCMs) complies with all pertinent laws. The Dated: December 8, 2016. that comply with existing USACE FEIS presents the results of USACE’s regulations and reflect operations under analysis of the environmental effects of Mark Harberg, existing congressional authorizations, the Proposed Action Alternative (PAA) Missouri River Recovery Program Manager, taking into account changes in basin that the USACE believes accomplishes U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. hydrology and demands from years of these objectives. [FR Doc. 2016–30294 Filed 12–15–16; 8:45 am] growth and development, new/ USACE evaluated an array of BILLING CODE 3720–58–P rehabilitated structural features, legal potential water management alternatives developments, and environmental and optional water supply amounts during the Master Manual update DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE issues. The action includes updates to account for a June 28, 2011, decision of process, resulting in the selection of the Department of the Army; Corps of the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals. PAA. Additional information on the Engineers On May 16, 2000, the Governor of the components of the PAA can be found at State of Georgia submitted a formal http://www.sam.usace.army.mil/ Notice of Availability—Final request to the Assistant Secretary of the Missions/PlanningEnvironmental/ Environmental Impact Statement for Army (Civil Works) to adjust the ACFMasterWaterControlManualUpdate/ the Update of the Water Control operation of Lake Lanier, and to enter ACFDocumentLibrary.aspx. Manuals and Water Supply Storage into agreements with the state or water One alternative available to USACE is Assessment for the Apalachicola- supply providers to accommodate to continue with current operations. Chattahoochee-Flint River Basin increases in water supply withdrawals This approach is termed the No Action from Lake Lanier and downstream at Alternative (NAA). The PAA would AGENCY: Department of the Army, U.S. Atlanta over the next 30 years, update the water control plans and Army Corps of Engineers, DoD. culminating in total gross withdrawals manuals for the ACF Basin as directed ACTION: Notice of availability. of 705 million gallons per day (mgd)— by Secretary of the Army Pete Geren on 297 mgd from Lake Lanier and 408 mgd January 30, 2008. Additionally, the PAA SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that downstream—by the year 2030. The would provide for releases from Buford the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Dam to satisfy Georgia’s 2015 request of Mobile District (USACE), has released Works) in 2002 denied Georgia’s 379 mgd from the Chattahoochee River the Final Environmental Impact request. The 2011 decision of the 11th for Metro Atlanta and would reallocate Statement (FEIS) for the update of the Circuit Court of Appeals ordered storage in Lake Lanier of 252,950 acre- Apalachicola-Chattahoochee-Flint USACE to reconsider whether it has the feet to satisfy Georgia’s 2015 request and (ACF) Water Control Master Manual legal authority to operate the Buford support average annual water supply (Master Manual) Alabama, Florida, and project to accommodate Georgia’s withdrawals of up to 222 mgd. Georgia including a water supply request. USACE provided a legal The FEIS responds to, and storage assessment addressing opinion concluding that it has sufficient incorporates agency and public reallocation of storage in Lake Sidney authority under applicable law to comments received on the DEIS, which Lanier (Lake Lanier). accommodate that request, but noted was available for public review from A Notice of Availability was that any decision to take action on October 2, 2015, through January 15, published by the Environmental Georgia’s request would require a 2016. Five open house style public Protection Agency on December 16, separate analysis. On January 11, 2013, meetings were held on October 26th 2016. The review period will end 30 the Governor of the state of Georgia through November 9th, 2015, and more days after that date. provided updated demographic and than 300 persons attended these DATES: The review period of the FEIS water demand data to confirm the workshops, either representing various ends on January 14, 2017. continued need for 705 mgd to meet agencies and organizations or as FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Georgia’s water needs from Lake Lanier interested individual citizens. Two Lewis Sumner at telephone (251) 694– and the Chattahoochee River to hundred seventy (270) comments on the 3857. approximately the year 2040 rather than DEIS were submitted by agencies SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 2030 as specified in the 2000 request. (Federal, state, and local), private Master Manual includes appendices On December 4, 2015, after the Draft organizations, and individuals. The prepared for individual projects in the Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) USACE responses to substantive agency ACF Basin and is the guide used by had been published, the Georgia and public comments are provided in USACE to operate a system of five Environmental Protection Division appendix C of the FEIS. federal reservoir projects in the basin— (GAEPD), on behalf of the State of USACE incorporated pertinent Buford Dam and Lake Lanier, West Georgia, provided additional updated revisions and updates to the EIS and the Point Dam and Lake, Walter F. George demographic and water demand data WCM based on input received during Lock and Dam and Lake, George W. (referred to as Georgia’s 2015 request) the public review process. The key Andrews Lock and Dam and Lake, and that reduced the state’s needs from a revisions and updates to the documents VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:42 Dec 15, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00040 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\16DEN1.SGM 16DEN1 mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 242 / Friday, December 16, 2016 / Notices 91155 included in the FEIS for the WCM incorporated the revised water supply available following coordination of the update include: information. All pertinent subsections DEIS and in response to comments on • Sections 1 through 12 were revised within section 6 have been updated the DEIS from agencies, the public, and to make minor technical and accordingly. independent external peer review. administrative corrections and updates • Appendix A (Master WCM and • Appendix O (Unimpaired Flow based on agency and public comments, Individual Project WCMs) was updated Dataset) was added to describe the independent external peer review to include pertinent technical development of the unimpaired flow comments, and relevant additional corrections and administrative updates dataset. information obtained since the DEIS based on agency and public comments, was published. independent external peer review Document Availability • Section 4 was also updated to more comments, and relevant additional The FEIS and appendices are fully describe and clarify (1) the two- information obtained since the DEIS available for review in the following phased plan formulation process (water was published. formats: management alternatives/water supply • Appendix B (Water Supply Storage • Online as PDF documents at options) to determine the alternatives Assessment Report) was updated to www.sam.usace.army.mil/Missions/ evaluated in detail in section 6 (see the include the analysis of the new PlanningEnvironmental/ACF-Master- introduction to section 4); (2) how alternatives that incorporate additional Water-Control-Manual-Update/ACF- modeling was used in both phases of the population projections and water Document-Library.aspx plan formulation process to assess and supply demand projections provided by • As a CD when requested in writing narrow the array of alternatives Georgia in December 2015. to: Commander, U.S. Army Corps of considered in detail in section 6 and to • Appendix C (Pertinent Engineers, Mobile District, Attn: PD–EI provide a technical foundation for Correspondence) was updated to (ACF–FEIS), P.O. Box 2288, Mobile, AL environmental impact assessment of the incorporate agency and public 36628. alternatives considered in detail in comments on the DEIS (with USACE Next Steps section 6; (3) the screening process
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Upper Apalachicola-Chattahoochee
    Georgia: Upper Apalachicola- Case Study Chattahoochee-Flint River Basin Water Resource Strategies and Information Needs in Response to Extreme Weather/Climate Events ACF Basin The Story in Brief Communities in the Apalachicola-Chattahoochee-Flint River Basin (ACF) in Georgia, including Gwinnett County and the city of Atlanta, faced four consecutive extreme weather events: drought of 2007-08, floods of Sep- tember and winter 2009, and drought of 2011-12. These events cost taxpayers millions of dollars in damaged infrastructure, homes, and businesses and threatened water supply for ecological, agricultural, energy, and urban water users. Water utilities were faced with ensuring reliable service during and after these events. Drought of 2007-2008 and 2012 Impacts Northern Georgia saw record-low precipitation in 2007. By late spring 2008, Lake Lanier, the state’s major water supply, was at 50% of its storage capacity. The drought, combined with record-high temperatures, caused an estimated $1.3 billion in economic losses and threatened local water utilities’ ability to meet demand for four million people. Similar drought conditions unfolded in 2011-2012, during which numerous Water Trends Georgia counties were declared disaster zones. The Chattahoochee River, its tributaries, and Reduced rain affected recharge of the surface-water- Lake Lanier provide water to most of the dependent reservoir. It reduced flows, dried tributaries, “There is nothing simple, nothing one sub-basin Atlanta and Columbus metro populations. The and caused ecological damage in a landscape already river is the most heavily used water resource in affected by urbanization, impervious cover, and reduced can do to solve the problem.
    [Show full text]
  • Rule 391-3-6-.03. Water Use Classifications and Water Quality Standards
    Presented below are water quality standards that are in effect for Clean Water Act purposes. EPA is posting these standards as a convenience to users and has made a reasonable effort to assure their accuracy. Additionally, EPA has made a reasonable effort to identify parts of the standards that are not approved, disapproved, or are otherwise not in effect for Clean Water Act purposes. Rule 391-3-6-.03. Water Use Classifications and Water Quality Standards ( 1) Purpose. The establishment of water quality standards. (2) W ate r Quality Enhancement: (a) The purposes and intent of the State in establishing Water Quality Standards are to provide enhancement of water quality and prevention of pollution; to protect the public health or welfare in accordance with the public interest for drinking water supplies, conservation of fish, wildlife and other beneficial aquatic life, and agricultural, industrial, recreational, and other reasonable and necessary uses and to maintain and improve the biological integrity of the waters of the State. ( b) The following paragraphs describe the three tiers of the State's waters. (i) Tier 1 - Existing instream water uses and the level of water quality necessary to protect the existing uses shall be maintained and protected. (ii) Tier 2 - Where the quality of the waters exceed levels necessary to support propagation of fish, shellfish, and wildlife and recreation in and on the water, that quality shall be maintained and protected unless the division finds, after full satisfaction of the intergovernmental coordination and public participation provisions of the division's continuing planning process, that allowing lower water quality is necessary to accommodate important economic or social development in the area in which the waters are located.
    [Show full text]
  • 0429Lanierdoc
    Planned Primary Project Name Corps District Work Description Allocation State ($000) Work performed with recovery funds includes the control and removal of nuisance vegetation from the upper St. Johns River which serves as a nursery area for vegetation which floats downstream into the St. Johns River Federal Navigation Project. This work will keep the project channel open for navigation and to ensure public safety. This vegetation also displaces native species, changes ecosystem structure and alters ecological functions potentially impacting threatened and endangered species. Work will be FL REMOVAL OF AQUATIC GROWTH, FL JACKSONVILLE performed by hired contract. 225 Award a contract for replacement of critical equipment used to conduct invasive vegetation operations in the Jacksonville District. These operations include survey and monitoring of vegetation in the St. Johns River and Lake Okeechobee. The operations keep the principal navigable waterways and structures open for navigation and to ensure public safety. Additionally, this vegetation displaces native species, changes ecosystem structure and alters ecological functions potentially impacting threatened and endangered FL REMOVAL OF AQUATIC GROWTH, FL JACKSONVILLE species 225 Snagging, clearing, and removal of fallen trees, stumps and other debris from the Withlachoochee River FL WITHLACOOCHEE RIVER, FL JACKSONVILLE Federal navigation Project for the purpose of ensuring navigation and public safety. 250 Update inundation mapping below project for dam safety, flood damage reduction and emergency action GA ALLATOONA LAKE, GA MOBILE plans in order to improve emergency response to flood events and reduce risk to public. 350 Hire additional contract employees to provide increased maintenance support for project facilities.These activities will provide the public a safe and enjoyable recreational experience at the project.
    [Show full text]
  • Trophic State and Metabolism in a Southeastern Piedmont Reservoir
    TROPHIC STATE AND METABOLISM IN A SOUTHEASTERN PIEDMONT RESERVOIR by Mary Callie Mayhew (Under the direction of Todd C. Rasmussen) Abstract Lake Sidney Lanier is a valuable water resource in the rapidly developing region north of Atlanta, Georgia, USA. The reservoir has been managed by the U.S Army Corps of Engineers for multiple purposes since its completion in 1958. Since approximately 1990, Lake Lanier has been central to series of lawsuits in the “Eastern Water Wars” between Georgia, Alabama and Florida due to its importance as a water-storage facility within the Apalachicola-Chattahoochee-Flint River Basin. Of specific importance is the need to protect lake water quality to satisfy regional water supply demands, as well as for recreational and environmental purposes. Recently, chlorophyll a levels have exceeded state water-quality standards. These excee- dences have prompted the Georgia Environmental Protection Division to develop Total Max- imum Daily Loads for phosphorus in Lake Lanier. While eutrophication in Southeastern Piedmont impoundments is a regional problem, nutrient cycling in these lakes does not appear to behave in a manner consistent with lakes in higher latitudes, and, hence, may not respond to nutrient-abatement strategies developed elsewhere. Although phosphorus loading to Southeastern Piedmont waterbodies is high, soluble reac- tive phosphorus concentrations are generally low and phosphorus exports from the reservoir are only a small fraction of input loads. The prevailing hypothesis is that ferric oxides in the iron-rich, clay soils of the Southeastern Piedmont effectively sequester phosphorus, which then settle into the lake benthos. Yet, seasonal algal blooms suggest the presence of internal cycling driven by uncertain mechanisms.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Internal Loading on Algal Biomass in Lake Allatoona, a Southeastern Piedmont Impoundment
    EFFECTS OF INTERNAL LOADING ON ALGAL BIOMASS IN LAKE ALLATOONA, A SOUTHEASTERN PIEDMONT IMPOUNDMENT by Elena Louise Ceballos (Under the direction of Todd C. Rasmussen) Abstract Cultural eutrophication of lakes is the accelerated nutrient enrichment resulting in detri- mental ecological effects such as algal blooms, lake anoxia and toxic metal release from sediments. Cultural eutrophication is a common occurrence in Piedmont impoundments in Georgia, as well as lakes and impoundments throughout the world. It often results in water unsafe for agricultural use, recreation and drinking. To reduce the cultural eutrophication of local Piedmont impoundments, recent regulatory controls for nutrients were established as part of the Clean Lakes program and court-ordered total maximum daily loads (TMDLs). These regulatory efforts focus on the reduction and minimization of point-source watershed nutrient inputs, primarily phosphorus, into lake sys- tems, as P is the limiting nutrient in Piedmont impoundments. Thus, reductions in phos- phorus loading are expected to improve lake water quality. However, in the Piedmont, as well as worldwide, many lakes continue to experience algal blooms and lake anoxia after sources of external loading are discontinued. The process of nutrient desorption from sediments, known as internal loading, has been identified to be a source of algal-available P, as well as other nutrients. The conditions under which internal loading takes place are region-specific as they vary based on local physical, chemical and biological conditions. The purpose of our research was to quantify changes in algal biomass in response to internal loading in Southeast Piedmont impoundments. The results from a mesocosm exper- iment, physical and chemical sediment analysis, and algal assays were used to characterize algal-availabile phosphorus in Southeastern Piedmont impoundments.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Lanier's Water Quality
    LAKE LANIER WATER QUALITY Val Perry AUTHOR: Valentine M. Perry, Lake Lanier Association, 615 F Oak Street, Suite 100, Gainesville, GA 30501 REFERENCE: Proceedings of the 2005 Georgia Water Resources Conference, held April 25-27, 2005, at The University of Georgia. Kathryn J. Hatcher, editor, Institute Ecology, The University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia. Abstract. Lake Lanier is a multi-purpose lake in Lake Lanier provides drinking water to 55% of Georgia Northeast Georgia which provides for flood protection, and 75% of Atlanta and North Georgia. It supports a $5.5 power generation, water supply, navigation, recreation, billion economy. The Lake Lanier Association was and fish and wildlife management. Additionally, it founded in 1960. It is a non profit association, whose supports a $5.5 billion economy. Lake Lanier’s waters members include recreational users, local businesses, and are currently degraded from non point source pollution as property owners. The association’s mission is to protect well as point source pollution from forty seven existing the quality and quantity of Lake Lanier through its sewage treatment plants. Twenty one years ago, the programs of education, action and advocacy. Georgia Environmental Protection Division enforced a moratorium on additional discharges in Lake Lanier. In POLLUTION TO LAKE LANIER November 2000 Gwinnett County requested and was granted by EPD a NPDES permit to discharge forty Forms of pollution that threaten Lake Lanier and its million gallons a day (MGD) of treated sewage into Lake watershed come from non point sources and point Lanier. The Lake Lanier Association and others sources. Non point source pollution includes runoff from challenged this permit in December 2000 because the soil erosion from construction sites, fertilizer runoff from discharge would degrade the Lanier’s high quality both rural and urban areas, waste from farmlands and waters.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Allatoona Water Release Schedule
    Lake Allatoona Water Release Schedule Size and corky Chaim never estranges his floodwaters! Aloysius earwigs her inappetence whisperingly, she contravening it apogeotropically. Vernor remains choicest: she petition her hyperactivity designates too fro? For this annual hunt area is access properties for allatoona water through these bass fishing report and competitive analytics logging goes home a safety Deliberately Briony lifted a shaking hand and wiped at the sweat from her face, smearing blood on her forehead, looking as fragile as possible. Water releases water level. Representative from the State of Florida, prepared statement. Lake Gen Rain Current Elevation Full Elevation Allatoona 0 2771 40 Lanier Buford Dam 10695 1071 Carters 107140 1072 Hartwell 6572 660. This lake allatoona dam portrays regional blood drive schedule and physical, and table rock dam is a few minutes. Marietta Water in about your contract excedence? Can see it back to expand the thunder rumbled, but the lake downstream from inside her or any drought or so that. Current status of the company is Admin. Please verify system you are straight a robot. Other than in silence, he sought no concealment for or knew however even drought he were discovered they could easily take him again however he could telling the palisade and extend it. Canton lake allatoona water release schedules and discharging into the lakes in florida who live on site can. Yes, sir, we will follow the law. No, extra airline pilot in here would construct a Mayday message on weapon specific emergency channel using any one of fur four radios. Price versus availability in the! Watercraft and lake levels find detailed description of lakes like ernie, other presidential documents.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Quality in Georgia 2006-2007
    WATER QUALITY IN GEORGIA 2006-2007 Georgia Department of Natural Resources Environmental Protection Division WATER QUALITY IN GEORGIA 2006-2007 Georgia Department of Natural Resources Environmental Protection Division 205 Butler Street, SE Floyd Towers East Atlanta, Georgia 30334 WATER QUALITY IN GEORGIA 2006-2007 WATER QUALITY IN GEORGIA 2006-2007 Preface This report was prepared by the Georgia Environmental Protection Division GAEPD, Department of Natural Resources, as required by Section 305(b) of Public Law 92-500 (the Clean Water Act) and as a public information document. It represents a synoptic extraction of the EPD files and, in certain cases; information has been presented in summary form from those files. The reader is therefore advised to use this condensed information with the knowledge that it is a summary document and more detailed information is available in the EPD files. This report covers a two-year period, January 1, 2006 through December 31, 2007. Comments or questions related to the content of this report are invited and should be addressed to: Environmental Protection Division Georgia Department of Natural Resources Watershed Protection Branch 4220 International Parkway Suite 101 Atlanta, Georgia 30354 WATER QUALITY IN GEORGIA 2006-2007 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 – EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PAGE Purpose…………………………………………………………………………………… 9 Watershed Protection In Georgia………………………………………………………..9 Watershed Protection Programs……………………………………………………….. 10 Comprehensive Statewide Water Management Planning…………………. 10 Watershed Projects……………………………………………………………. 10 Monitoring and Assessment…………………………………………………… 10 Water Quality Modeling/Wasteload Allocation/TMDL Development……… 10 TMDL Implementation Plan Development…………………………………… 11 State Revolving Loan Fund………………………………………...…………. 11 GEFA Implementation Unit……………………………………………………. 11 NPDES Permitting and Enforcement………………………………………… 11 Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations………………………………….. 12 Zero Tolerance………………………………………………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • David Stuart Leigh
    1 DAVID STUART LEIGH Department of Geography University of Georgia Athens, GA 30602-2502 EDUCATION 1982 B.A. in Geography, University of Colorado at Boulder, 1977-1982; Major in Physical Geography, Minor in Anthropology. 1988 M.S. in Geography, University of Wisconsin at Madison, 1985-1988; Major in Physical Geography (Geomorphology), Minor in Environmental Studies. Thesis: “Pleistocene Stratigraphy and Geomorphology of the Bridgeport Terrace of the Lower Wisconsin River Valley near Muscoda and Blue River, Wisconsin,” 167 pp. Advised by Dr. James C. Knox 1991 Ph.D. in Geography, University of Wisconsin at Madison, 1988-1991; Major in Physical Geography (Geomorphology), Minor in Geology and Soil Science. Dissertation: “Origin and Paleoenvironment of the Upper Mississippi Valley Roxana Silt,” 186 pp. Advised by Dr. James C. Knox EXPERTISE Geomorphology, Quaternary Geology, Geoarchaeology, Environmental Geology, Geoecology PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYMENT June 1982 to September 1985: Assistant Geomorphologist, Center for American Archeology, Kampsville, IL 62053. Worked on geomorphic mapping of alluvial river valleys and archaeological site formation processes; Archaeological site excavation experience also was gained. Work was supervised by Dr. Edwin R. Hajic. September 1985 to August 1990: Research and Teaching Assistant, Department of Geography, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706. Research Assistant to Dr. James C. Knox on NSF research projects in fluvial geomorphology 1985-1990; Teaching Assistant Fall 1989 for Introductory Physical Geography Laboratory. September 1990 to September 1991: Lecturer, Department of Geography, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706. Taught Introductory Physical Geography. September 1991 to September 1992 - Temporary Assistant Professor, Department of Geography, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602. Taught Earth Science Survey and Weather & Climate classes.
    [Show full text]
  • Equitable Apportionment of the Apalachicola-Chattahoochee-Flint River Basin
    Florida State University Law Review Volume 36 Issue 4 Article 6 2009 A Tale of Three States: Equitable Apportionment of the Apalachicola-Chattahoochee-Flint River Basin Alyssa S. Lathrop [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.law.fsu.edu/lr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Alyssa S. Lathrop, A Tale of Three States: Equitable Apportionment of the Apalachicola-Chattahoochee- Flint River Basin, 36 Fla. St. U. L. Rev. (2009) . https://ir.law.fsu.edu/lr/vol36/iss4/6 This Comment is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Florida State University Law Review by an authorized editor of Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW A TALE OF THREE STATES: EQUITABLE APPORTIONMENT OF THE APALACHICOLA-CHATTHOOCHEE-FLINT RIVER BASIN Alyssa S. Lothrop VOLUME 36 SUMMER 2009 NUMBER 4 Recommended citation: Alyssa S. Lothrop, A Tale of Three States: Equitable Apportionment of the Apalachicola-Chatthoochee-Flint River Basin, 36 FLA. ST. U. L. REV. 865 (2009). COMMENT A TALE OF THREE STATES: EQUITABLE APPORTIONMENT OF THE APALACHICOLA- CHATTAHOOCHEE-FLINT RIVER BASIN ALYSSA S. LATHROP* I. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 865 II. ATRAGEDY OF THE COMMONS:THE ACF RIVER BASIN .................................... 866 A. History and the Beginning of the Conflict ................................................. 867 B. The ACF Compact: A Failed Attempt to Resolve ....................................... 870 C. A Tangled Web of Litigation ...................................................................... 871 D. Current Status of the Water War ............................................................... 873 E. A New Kind of Water War Rages On ......................................................... 877 III. SOME BACKGROUND:WATER LAW &EQUITABLE APPORTIONMENT .................
    [Show full text]
  • Dirty Dozen Report Because Pollution from the Mill Continues
    GEORGIA’S HEADWATER STREAMS COOSA RIVER LAKE LANIER GEORGIA’S RURAL COMMUNITIES GEORGIA’S PUBLIC HEALTH CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVER OCMULGEE RIVER ALTAMAHA RIVER TERRY CREEK ST. SIMON’S OKEFENOKEE SOUND SWAMP ST. MARY’S RIVER 2019’s Worst Offenses Against GEORGIA’S WATER GEORGIA WATER COALITION’S DIRTY DOZEN A Call to Action The Georgia Water Coalition’s Dirty Dozen list highlights the politics, policies and issues that threaten the health of Georgia’s water and the well-being of 10 million Georgians. The purpose of the report is not to identify the state’s “most polluted places.” Instead the report is a call to action for Georgia’s leaders and its citizens to solve ongoing pollution problems, eliminate potential threats to Georgia’s water and correct state and federal policies and actions that lead to polluted water. Unfortunately, this year’s report includes seven issues that are making return visits to this inauspicious list. Topping that category is pollution of the Altamaha River from the Rayonier Advanced Materials (RAM) chemical pulp mill in Jesup. The facility is making a record seventh appearance in the Dirty Dozen report because pollution from the mill continues. Next year, Georgia’s Environmental Protection Division (EPD) will issue a new pollution control permit for the facility, but if EPD’s actions in recent years are any indication, it seems unlikely that this new permit will fix this ongoing pollution problem. The state agency has repeatedly defended the existing and weak The Georgia Water Coalition’s Dirty Dozen report is a pollution control permit and last year took the extraordinary step of call to action for Georgia’s leaders and citizens to solve changing state laws to make it easier for RAM to continue polluting ongoing pollution problems, eliminate potential threats Georgia’s largest river.
    [Show full text]
  • Top 50 Biggest Largemouth Caught in Our State!
    Rank Weight Location Angler Date 1. 22-lbs., 4-oz. Montgomery Lake George Perry 6/2/32 2. 18-lbs., 1-oz. Marben PFA Ron Petzelt 9/15/87 (Lake Margery) 3. 17-lbs., 14-oz. Chastain’s Lake Nickey Rich 4/27/65 (Cobb Co.) 4. 17-lbs., 9-oz. Lake Lanier Emory Dunahoo 12/19/65 5. 17-lbs., 4-oz. Marben PFA Jerry Jones 4/22/90 (Lake Margery) 6. 17-lbs., 0-oz. Lake Gale Robert C. Stone 3/18/74 (Midway, Ga.) 7. 16-lbs., 11-oz. Lake Chatuge David Presely 3/27/76 8. 16-lbs., 9.3-oz. Marion Co. Lake Sam Taylor 3/15/02 9. 16-lbs., 9-oz. Lake Allatoona Greg Rymer 8/31/82 10. 16-lbs., 8-oz. Lake Eufaula John Giles 3/12/80 11. 16-lbs., 4-oz. Lake Spivey Annie Malcolm 1971 16-lbs., 4-oz. Lake Seminole Charles Tyson 5/23/61 13. 16-lbs., 2-oz. Morgan Co. Pond Robert Hilsman 4/7/62 14. 16-lbs., 1.2-oz. Fort Stewart David Gregory 5/26/01 (Big Metz Lake) 15. 16-lbs., 0-oz. Forsyth Co. Pond Donald L. Smith 5/19/97 16. 15-lbs., 15.4-oz. Marion Co. Lake Sam Taylor 3/16/02 17. 15-lbs., 13-oz. Lamar Co. Pond Bryan McBride 12/10/98 18. 15-lbs., 12-oz. Fort Stewart Don Harlow 2/20/93 (Dogwood Lake) 19. 15-lbs., 10-oz. Lake Seminole R.P. Bolton 1970 20. 15-lbs., 9.6-oz. Fort Stewart Greg Harvey 2/12/99 (Canoochee Creek Reservoir) 21.
    [Show full text]