DOCSLIB.ORG

Botany-Cronquist's System of Classification

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Botany-Cronquist's System of Classification Plant Taxonomy Prof.(Dr.)Punam Jeswal Head B.Sc (Hons.) Part ll Botany Department Cronquist's System of Classification of Angiospermic Plant Cronquist's System Arthur Cronquist, a curator of New York Botanical Garden proposed a system of classification in his book entitled -"The Evolution and Classification of Flowering Plants" (1968), it is elaboration and modification of a scheme presented in 1957 under the title "Outline of a New System of Families and Order's of Dicotyledons". The latest version of his system appeared in 1981 in "An Integrated System of Classification of Flowering Plants" where he divided the division Magnoliophyta (Angiosperms) into two classes; Magnoliopsida and Liliopsida. Salient Features Cronquist considered Pteridosperms (seed ferns) as probable ancestors of angiosperms. His ideas of evolutionary trends among angiosperms are that : 1. The primitive angiosperms are evergreen trees or perhaps large shrubs and herbs are advanced. 2. Simple and entire leaves are primitive. 3. Pinnately net veined leaves are primitive as compared to parallel veined leaves. 4. The primitive stomata are ranunculaceous type from which other types have been derived. 5. The nodes are probably unilacunar with two traces or perhaps trilacunar in primitive angiosperms. 6. Vessel less wood is primitive than with vessels. Angiosperms 2 Classes Magnoliopsida Liliopsida (Dicots) (Monocots) 6 Subclasses Magnolidae Hamamelidae Caryophyllidae Dillenidae Rosidae Asteridae (8 Orders) (11 Orders) (3 Orders) (13 Orders) (18 Orders) (11 Orders) 5 Subclasses Alismatidae Arecidae Commelinidae Zingiberidae Liliidae (4 Orders) (4 Orders) (7 Orders) (2 Orders) (2 Orders) Fig. Outline Classification of Arthur Cronquist 7. The primitive flowers are large and terminal which has numerous spirally arranged large and free tepals. 8. Stamens are numerous and leaf like, spirally arranged in primitive flowers. 9. Unisexual flowers are derived from bisexual flowers. 10. Primitive pollen is uniaperturate with a long sulcus from which triaperturate is derived. 11. Pollination by beetles that chewed and ate the parts of the flower is primitive and wind pollination derived from it. 12. Carpels is primitive flower are numerous, spirally arranged, leaf, like and probably stipitate. Each carpel has numerous ovules and margins provided with tuft of hairs. Reduction in number of carpels and their fusion is found in advanced taxa. 13. Anatropous, bitegmic ovules with massive nucellus is primitive and other types are derived from it. 14. Among embryo sacs, Polygonum 8- nucleate embryo sac is most primitive and others are derived from it. 15. Nuclear endosperm is primitive and cellular and helobial are advanced. 16. Dicotyledonous embryos with two cotyledons are primitive and the monocot embryo is advanced. Critical Comments Merits 1. Magnoliales comprising 17 families are treated as most primitive order among the angiosperms and kept in the beginning. 2. Family Canellaceae which was placed under Parietales has been shifted to Magnoliales. 3. Family Ceratophyllaceae which was placed under ordines anomali, is shifted to aquatic Nymphaeales. 4. Aristolochiaceae of Multiovulatae Terrestres has been placed near Magnoliales. 5. Papaveraceae and Fumariceae are treated separate families and kept under the order Papaverales. 6. Urticales comprising Urticaceae, Ulmaceae, Moraceae etc. are placed under subclass Hamamelidae. 7. Cactaceae is included under Caryophyllales (= Centrospermae). 8. Paeonia is treated as a separate family from Ranunculaceae, and placed under Dilleniales. 9. Podostemaceae is placed after Rosales. 10. Cuscutaceae is separated from Convolvulaceae. 11. Callitrichaceae is placed under Lamiales along with Labiatae and Verbenaceae. 12. Compositae (Asteraceae) is placed at the top of Dicotyledons. 13. Alismatales including Butomaceae, Alismataceae are placed in the beginning of the monocots. 14. Orchidaceae are placed at the top of monocotyledones. 15. Anatomical, playnological, embyrological evidences have been taken into consideration. 16. Dicotyledones have been placed before monocotyledones. Demerits 1. In Violales (=Parietales), inclusion of Tamaricaceae and Frankeniaceae is not justified because they differ from other families of the order in having NPC formula 345. In Parietales it is 434. Hutchinson kept these in a separate order Tamaricales. 2. The family Cornaceae that shows strong affinities with Araliaceae and Umbelliferae has been separated from that alliance and kept under Cornales of subclass Rosidae while the other two have been placed under Apiales. 3. The family Lecythidaceae that is closely allied to Myrtales has been placed under order Lecythidaceae of subclass Dillenideae while Myrtales have been placed under subclass Rosidae. 4. Cyperaceae and Poaceae (Gramineae) have been placed together under Cyperales, but the studies have shown that these two families are quite distinct. Hutchinson and Takhatajan rightly placed them under separate orders. 5. Placing of Liliales after Arecales and Cyperales is not justified, because these two orders are supposed to have Liliaceaeous ancestry. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Life History Mediates the Trade-Offs Among Different Components Of
    1 Life history mediates the trade-offs among different components 2 of demographic resilience 3 4 Authors: Pol Capdevila1,2*, Iain Stott3, James Cant4, Maria Beger4,5, Gwilym 5 Rowlands1, Molly Grace1, Roberto Salguero-Gómez1,5,6 6 1Zoology Department, Oxford University, Zoology Research and Administration Building, 11a 7 Mansfield Rd, Oxford OX1 3SZ, UK 8 2School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, 24 Tyndall Ave, BS8 1TQ, Bristol, UK 9 3School of Life Sciences, University of Lincoln, Brayford Pool, Lincoln LN6 7TS, UK 10 4School of Biology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Leeds, UK, LS2 9JT 11 5Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science, School of Biological Sciences, University of 12 Queensland, Brisbane, 4072, Australia 13 6Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Konrad Zuse Straße 1, Rostock 18057, Germany 14 *Corresponding author: [email protected] 1 15 Table S1. Taxonomic summary of the matrix population models used in our 16 analyses. N sp represents the number of species and N pop the number of 17 populations. Kingdom Class Order N sp N pop Perciformes 3 3 Actinopterygii Siluriformes 1 1 Elasmobranchii Lamniformes 1 2 Accipitriformes 5 9 Anseriformes 1 3 Charadriiformes 3 6 Falconiformes 1 2 Galliformes 1 1 Aves Gruiformes 1 1 Passeriformes 1 1 Pelecaniformes 1 1 Procellariiformes 2 2 Animalia Psittaciformes 2 3 Strigiformes 1 1 Artiodactyla 5 43 Carnivora 12 24 Chiroptera 1 1 Mammalia Diprotodontia 1 1 Primates 9 14 Proboscidea 1 1 Rodentia 4 5 Crocodylia 1 1 Reptilia Squamata 1 3 Testudines 8 19 Alismatales 1 1 Asparagales 5 18 Dioscoreales 1 1 Liliopsida Liliales 14 72 Poales 7 19 Zingiberales 2 6 Apiales 7 20 Plantae Asterales 20 44 Brassicales 10 34 Caryophyllales 33 84 Magnoliopsida Cornales 1 1 Dipsacales 2 6 Ericales 11 60 Fabales 12 70 2 Fagales 4 31 Gentianales 3 4 Geraniales 2 8 Lamiales 11 45 Magnoliales 1 1 Malpighiales 10 23 Malvales 4 8 Myrtales 3 12 Proteales 1 2 Ranunculales 11 31 Rosales 4 7 Sapindales 4 4 Saxifragales 1 1 Solanales 2 2 Pinopsida Pinales 4 6 18 3 19 Table S2.
    [Show full text]
  • Full of Beans: a Study on the Alignment of Two Flowering Plants Classification Systems
    Full of beans: a study on the alignment of two flowering plants classification systems Yi-Yun Cheng and Bertram Ludäscher School of Information Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA {yiyunyc2,ludaesch}@illinois.edu Abstract. Advancements in technologies such as DNA analysis have given rise to new ways in organizing organisms in biodiversity classification systems. In this paper, we examine the feasibility of aligning two classification systems for flowering plants using a logic-based, Region Connection Calculus (RCC-5) ap- proach. The older “Cronquist system” (1981) classifies plants using their mor- phological features, while the more recent Angiosperm Phylogeny Group IV (APG IV) (2016) system classifies based on many new methods including ge- nome-level analysis. In our approach, we align pairwise concepts X and Y from two taxonomies using five basic set relations: congruence (X=Y), inclusion (X>Y), inverse inclusion (X<Y), overlap (X><Y), and disjointness (X!Y). With some of the RCC-5 relationships among the Fabaceae family (beans family) and the Sapindaceae family (maple family) uncertain, we anticipate that the merging of the two classification systems will lead to numerous merged solutions, so- called possible worlds. Our research demonstrates how logic-based alignment with ambiguities can lead to multiple merged solutions, which would not have been feasible when aligning taxonomies, classifications, or other knowledge or- ganization systems (KOS) manually. We believe that this work can introduce a novel approach for aligning KOS, where merged possible worlds can serve as a minimum viable product for engaging domain experts in the loop. Keywords: taxonomy alignment, KOS alignment, interoperability 1 Introduction With the advent of large-scale technologies and datasets, it has become increasingly difficult to organize information using a stable unitary classification scheme over time.
    [Show full text]
  • Reminder Arthur Cronquist Dies PROGRAMS the Jekyll and Hyde Of
    May - Julie 1992 Vol. 2, No. 3 Reminder the Jekyll and Hyde The spring is passing by, and it's time to pay those 1992 dues if you haven't already done so. Please check of the Long Island Flora this issue's mailing label. If the code *NP* appears, we haven't yet received your membership renewal. Dr. John Fogg, in his wonderful Wectis of Lawn Membership is $10.00 per calendar year. Make and Garden (1945) called poke (Phylolaccu nnlcricnnu checks payable to: L.I. Botanical Socicty and mail to: L.) the "Jekyll and Hyde of thc plant worltl," and Lois Lindberg, Membership revealed his horticultural disdain by suggesting "... war Welwyn Prcscrve should be declared on all suspects [sectllings hclicvcd LO Cresccnt Bcach Rd. represent poke] and they should be ruthlessly Glen Covc, NY 11542 liquidated." Knowledge gained since Dr. Fogg's 1945 If you hnvc rcceivcd a co~nplimentarynewsletter, insights has shown him to be more corrcct in his please indicalc if you would likc to remain on our assessment of the good vs. evil, yinlyang of pokc than mailing list. he could have ever expected. Arthur Cronquist Dies On March 22, 1992, Arthur Cronquist of the New York Botanical Garden died of a heart attack while working on the Intermountain Flora in Utah. The New York Botanical Garden will have a memorial service on May 5, 1992 at 11:00 a.m. For more information contact the New York Botanical Garden. If you wish to submit reminiscences of Dr. Cronquist we will gather Beyond being a garden pest, poke is dangerous.
    [Show full text]
  • (Monocot): the Story of a Gene Family Expansion Alberto Cenci, Nathalie Chantret, Mathieu Rouard
    Glycosyltransferase Family 61 in Liliopsida (Monocot): The Story of a Gene Family Expansion Alberto Cenci, Nathalie Chantret, Mathieu Rouard To cite this version: Alberto Cenci, Nathalie Chantret, Mathieu Rouard. Glycosyltransferase Family 61 in Liliopsida (Monocot): The Story of a Gene Family Expansion. Frontiers in Plant Science, Frontiers, 2018, 9, 10.3389/fpls.2018.01843. hal-02621636 HAL Id: hal-02621636 https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02621636 Submitted on 26 May 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution| 4.0 International License fpls-09-01843 December 8, 2018 Time: 15:6 # 1 ORIGINAL RESEARCH published: 11 December 2018 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01843 Glycosyltransferase Family 61 in Liliopsida (Monocot): The Story of a Gene Family Expansion Alberto Cenci1*, Nathalie Chantret2 and Mathieu Rouard1 1 Bioversity International, Parc Scientifique Agropolis II, Montpellier, France, 2 AGAP, INRA, CIRAD, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France Plant cell walls play a fundamental role in several plant traits and also influence crop use as livestock nutrition or biofuel production. The Glycosyltransferase family 61 (GT61) is involved in the synthesis of cell wall xylans.
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Science Bulletin A
    PLANT SCIENCE BULLETIN A. Publication of the &tanical Societyof A.merica,Inc. VOLUME 3 JULY, 1957 NUMBER 3 Genetics, Corn, and Potato in the USSR ANTON LANG Department of Botany, Univ. of California. Los Angeles In April. 1956, the Soviet Russian government an- corn. He declared that, corn being a cross-pollinating nounced the resignation of T. D. Lysenko as president plant, inbreeding would lead to a "biological im- of the All-Union Lenin Academy of Agricultural poverishment of its genetical basis," that a "half-dead Science. This event signified theencL of the period of organism" would result, and that it would be impossible absolute domination which the so-called Soviet or to maintain inbred lines for more than 10 or 11 genera- Michurin-Lysenko genetics had enjoyed in the USSR. tions.2 He ridiculed the idea that crossing such inbreds This time therefore seemsappropriate for assessingsome could produce a superior plant. Instead, he advocated of the consequenceswhich the Lysenkoist experiment the use of varietal hybrids, asserting. in addition. that had for the USSR. The losses suffered by science can their hybrid vigor would not be limited to Fl' but be appreciated fairly easily. although it will probably would persist through F2 and Fs. take a long time before all details will be known. Any Under Lysenko's influence. breeding of hybrid corn person with some appreciation for the continuity of (in the "Western" sense) was completely abandoned scientific work can visualize how an experimental science in the USSR for more than 10 years, until 1947. when will be affected by eight years of almost total suppres- the All-Union Institute of Plant Industry (formerly sion.
    [Show full text]
  • Threatened and Endangered Species List
    Effective April 15, 2009 - List is subject to revision For a complete list of Tennessee's Rare and Endangered Species, visit the Natural Areas website at http://tennessee.gov/environment/na/ Aquatic and Semi-aquatic Plants and Aquatic Animals with Protected Status State Federal Type Class Order Scientific Name Common Name Status Status Habit Amphibian Amphibia Anura Gyrinophilus gulolineatus Berry Cave Salamander T Amphibian Amphibia Anura Gyrinophilus palleucus Tennessee Cave Salamander T Crustacean Malacostraca Decapoda Cambarus bouchardi Big South Fork Crayfish E Crustacean Malacostraca Decapoda Cambarus cymatilis A Crayfish E Crustacean Malacostraca Decapoda Cambarus deweesae Valley Flame Crayfish E Crustacean Malacostraca Decapoda Cambarus extraneus Chickamauga Crayfish T Crustacean Malacostraca Decapoda Cambarus obeyensis Obey Crayfish T Crustacean Malacostraca Decapoda Cambarus pristinus A Crayfish E Crustacean Malacostraca Decapoda Cambarus williami "Brawley's Fork Crayfish" E Crustacean Malacostraca Decapoda Fallicambarus hortoni Hatchie Burrowing Crayfish E Crustacean Malocostraca Decapoda Orconectes incomptus Tennessee Cave Crayfish E Crustacean Malocostraca Decapoda Orconectes shoupi Nashville Crayfish E LE Crustacean Malocostraca Decapoda Orconectes wrighti A Crayfish E Fern and Fern Ally Filicopsida Polypodiales Dryopteris carthusiana Spinulose Shield Fern T Bogs Fern and Fern Ally Filicopsida Polypodiales Dryopteris cristata Crested Shield-Fern T FACW, OBL, Bogs Fern and Fern Ally Filicopsida Polypodiales Trichomanes boschianum
    [Show full text]
  • Botanical Gardens in the West Indies John Parker: the Botanic Garden of the University of Cambridge Holly H
    A Publication of the Foundation for Landscape Studies A Journal of Place Volume ıı | Number ı | Fall 2006 Essay: The Botanical Garden 2 Elizabeth Barlow Rogers: Introduction Fabio Gabari: The Botanical Garden of the University of Pisa Gerda van Uffelen: Hortus Botanicus Leiden Rosie Atkins: Chelsea Physic Garden Nina Antonetti: British Colonial Botanical Gardens in the West Indies John Parker: The Botanic Garden of the University of Cambridge Holly H. Shimizu: United States Botanic Garden Gregory Long: The New York Botanical Garden Mike Maunder: Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden Profile 13 Kim Tripp Exhibition Review 14 Justin Spring: Dutch Watercolors: The Great Age of the Leiden Botanical Garden New York Botanical Garden Book Reviews 18 Elizabeth Barlow Rogers: The Naming of Names: The Search for Order in the World of Plants By Anna Pavord Melanie L. Simo: Henry Shaw’s Victorian Landscapes: The Missouri Botanical Garden and Tower Grove Park By Carol Grove Judith B. Tankard: Maybeck’s Landscapes By Dianne Harris Calendar 22 Contributors 23 Letter from the Editor The Botanical Garden he term ‘globaliza- botanical gardens were plant species was the prima- Because of the botanical Introduction tion’ today has established to facilitate the ry focus of botanical gardens garden’s importance to soci- The Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries widespread cur- propagation and cultivation in former times, the loss of ety, the principal essay in he botanical garden is generally considered a rency. We use of new kinds of food crops species and habitats through this issue of Site/Lines treats Renaissance institution because of the establishment it to describe the and to act as holding opera- ecological destruction is a it as a historical institution in 1534 of gardens in Pisa and Padua specifically Tgrowth of multi-national tions for plants and seeds pressing concern in our as well as a landscape type dedicated to the study of plants.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Notes Careers Meetings Botany Resources
    Agriboard Agriboard, lumber substitutes made from plant fibers, are revolutionizing how plant wastes are used and has potential for far ranging impact on agriculture, forestry and conservation. Typing agriboard into a search engine brings up nearly 100 web pages. Three of these pages have been reviewed and are offered here for your examination. The first is an in-depth report from Environmental Building News, Vol. 4 (No. 3) and offers an excellent, balanced overview on the use of wheat straw lumber in homebuilding. The second article reviewed by EBL, Environmental Building News, Vol. 4 (No. 6), is a brief commentary on this topic including reaction to use of this material by an architect. Third is an excerpt written by David Morris, from the book, 'Non-woody Fibers and the Future of Rural Economics," edited by J. Janick., discussing general use of plant fibers for building materials. This last entry is of particular interest as it discusses cellulose for construction, from non-timber sources, in a broad sense. That opens the door to using native prairie grasses and other native plant resources to provide income from restored land . This is especially important for land which would otherwise be converted to cash crops and for areas which have lain fallow for several years but recently lost set aside status. It has also been pointed out that most areas loosing set aside status are eligible for organic certification. Production of agriboard fiber has potential to stand alone or easily dovetail with organic agriculture to aid conservation. MKVZant Return to Home Page Southern Illinois University Carbondale / Ethnobotanical Leaflets / URL: http://www.siu.edu/~ebl/ Last updated: 17-May-98 / du Ethnobotanical Leaflets Journal Contents Back Issues Book Reviews Research Notes Careers Meetings Botany Resources Inclusive Herbaria EDGAR ANDERSON Missouri Botanical Garden, St.
    [Show full text]
  • Saxifragaceae Sensu Lato (DNA Sequencing/Evolution/Systematics) DOUGLAS E
    Proc. Nati. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 87, pp. 4640-4644, June 1990 Evolution rbcL sequence divergence and phylogenetic relationships in Saxifragaceae sensu lato (DNA sequencing/evolution/systematics) DOUGLAS E. SOLTISt, PAMELA S. SOLTISt, MICHAEL T. CLEGGt, AND MARY DURBINt tDepartment of Botany, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164; and tDepartment of Botany and Plant Sciences, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521 Communicated by R. W. Allard, March 19, 1990 (received for review January 29, 1990) ABSTRACT Phylogenetic relationships are often poorly quenced and analyses to date indicate that it is reliable for understood at higher taxonomic levels (family and above) phylogenetic analysis at higher taxonomic levels, (ii) rbcL is despite intensive morphological analysis. An excellent example a large gene [>1400 base pairs (bp)] that provides numerous is Saxifragaceae sensu lato, which represents one of the major characters (bp) for phylogenetic studies, and (iii) the rate of phylogenetic problems in angiosperms at higher taxonomic evolution of rbcL is appropriate for addressing questions of levels. As originally defined, the family is a heterogeneous angiosperm phylogeny at the familial level or higher. assemblage of herbaceous and woody taxa comprising 15 We used rbcL sequence data to analyze phylogenetic subfamilies. Although more recent classifications fundamen- relationships in a particularly problematic group-Engler's tally modified this scheme, little agreement exists regarding the (8) broadly defined family Saxifragaceae (Saxifragaceae circumscription, taxonomic rank, or relationships of these sensu lato). Based on morphological analyses, the group is subfamilies. The recurrent discrepancies in taxonomic treat- almost impossible to distinguish or characterize clearly and ments of the Saxifragaceae prompted an investigation of the taxonomic problems at higher power of chloroplast gene sequences to resolve phylogenetic represents one of the greatest relationships within this family and between the Saxifragaceae levels in the angiosperms (9, 10).
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae
    Curriculum Vitae Miao Sun Contact Information Plant Evolution and Biodiversity (PEB) Group Department of Biology – Ecoinformatics and Biodiversity, Aarhus University Ny Munkegade 116, Building 1535, Room 227, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark Email: [email protected]; [email protected] Homepage: https://www.sunmiao.name Twitter: @Miao_the_Sun Education • 2009 ~ 2014, PhD in Botany, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences • 2006 ~ 2009, Master of Botany, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences • 2002 ~ 2006, Bachelor of Environmental Science, College of Resources and Environment, Beijing Forestry University • 2020.2 ~ 2020.8, Visiting scholar in Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan • 2012.10 ~ 2013.1, Visiting scholar in Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida Positions • Postdoctoral Research Fellow (2019.10 ~ present) Department of Bioscience, Aarhus University Advisor: Dr. Wolf L. Eiserhardt • Postdoctoral Research Fellow (2016 ~ 2019.8) Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida Advisor: Dr. Pamela S. Soltis • Postdoctoral Research Fellow (2015 ~ 2016) Department of Biology, University of Florida Advisor: Dr. Douglas E. Soltis • Research Assistant (2014.07 ~ 2015.01) State Key Laboratory of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences Advisor: Dr. Zhiduan Chen 1 Research Interests A phylogenetic tree is a pivotal framework for solving fundamental issues in biology. For a long term, I have endeavored to build large
    [Show full text]
  • Systematics and Biogeography of the Clusioid Clade (Malpighiales) Brad R
    Eastern Kentucky University Encompass Biological Sciences Faculty and Staff Research Biological Sciences January 2011 Systematics and Biogeography of the Clusioid Clade (Malpighiales) Brad R. Ruhfel Eastern Kentucky University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://encompass.eku.edu/bio_fsresearch Part of the Plant Biology Commons Recommended Citation Ruhfel, Brad R., "Systematics and Biogeography of the Clusioid Clade (Malpighiales)" (2011). Biological Sciences Faculty and Staff Research. Paper 3. http://encompass.eku.edu/bio_fsresearch/3 This is brought to you for free and open access by the Biological Sciences at Encompass. It has been accepted for inclusion in Biological Sciences Faculty and Staff Research by an authorized administrator of Encompass. For more information, please contact [email protected]. HARVARD UNIVERSITY Graduate School of Arts and Sciences DISSERTATION ACCEPTANCE CERTIFICATE The undersigned, appointed by the Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology have examined a dissertation entitled Systematics and biogeography of the clusioid clade (Malpighiales) presented by Brad R. Ruhfel candidate for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy and hereby certify that it is worthy of acceptance. Signature Typed name: Prof. Charles C. Davis Signature ( ^^^M^ *-^£<& Typed name: Profy^ndrew I^4*ooll Signature / / l^'^ i •*" Typed name: Signature Typed name Signature ^ft/V ^VC^L • Typed name: Prof. Peter Sfe^cnS* Date: 29 April 2011 Systematics and biogeography of the clusioid clade (Malpighiales) A dissertation presented by Brad R. Ruhfel to The Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the subject of Biology Harvard University Cambridge, Massachusetts May 2011 UMI Number: 3462126 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted.
    [Show full text]
  • Enquiry Into Plants the Causes of Plants De Historia Plantarum . Daucus
    The contributions are arranged as numbered lists for each taxonomist with the most important ones at the beginning. You don’t have to learn the complete note as it is, prepare them as shortnotes maximum 10 points for each taxonomist, choose them according to your own preference. Major Contribution of Theophrastus (372 BC to 287 BC) – Father of Botany Theophrastus was a Greek naturalist, he was student of Pluto and Aristotle. After Aristotle’s death, he inherited his library and the garden. Theophrastus is credited with having authored more than 200 works most of which survive as fragments or as quotations in the works of other authors. Two of his botanical works have survived intact, however, and are available in English translations: Enquiry into plants (1916) and The Causes of plants (1927). During his conquests, Alexander the Great made arrangements to send back materials to Athens, enabling Theophrastus to write about exotic plants such as cotton, cinnamon and bananas. His major contribution to botany are: 1. Theophrastus described about 500 kinds of plants, 2. He classified plants into four major groups: the trees, shrubs, subshrubs and herbs. 3. He recognized the differences between flowering plants and non-flowering plants, 4. He recognized the differences between dicotyledons and monocotyledons, superior ovary and inferior ovary, free and fused petals and also fruit types. 5. He was aware of the fact that many cultivated plants do not breed true. 6. Several names used by Theophrastus in his De Historia plantarum, e.g. Daucus, Crataegus and Narcissus, to name a few, are in use even today.
    [Show full text]