E Bay Report Se I S Delaware Bay Report Series

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

E Bay Report Se I S Delaware Bay Report Series u . -: (: "F ;Y'~!. "iA:~!~ '-_:, F :,;,y'''~',,,,,- ,0TUDIE!,s OCT 30 1973 t,,/c,\f\o:,,::) FiL.:....D ::::;TATION L!6RAHY E BAY REPORT SE I S DELAWARE BAY REPORT SERIES Volume 8 ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL ASPECTS OF DELAWARE'S COASTAL ZONE by Joel M. Goodman This series was prepared under a grant from the National Geographic Society Report Series Editor Dennis F. Polis Spring 1973 College of Marine Studies University of Delaware Newark, Delaware 19711 ( ) ) ) iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface I. Introduction 7 I I. The Im:Jortance of the Coastal Zone to Delaware 16 III. Historical Perspective 27 Recreation 29 Commercial Fishing 40 Industrial Development 48 IV. A Contemporary Geographic Perspective 57 The Delmarva Region 63 Population Growth 69 Tourism 70 Industry 74 The Metropolitan Region 74 Coastal Zone Communities 85 Harbor of Refuge, Delaware Bay 92 ) Wilmington Harbor, Christina River (Wilmington, Newport) 92 Smyrna River (Smyrna) 94 Leipsic River (Leipsic) 94 Little River (Little Creek) 94 St. Jones River (Bowers, Bowers Beach, Lebanon) 94 Murderkill River (Frederica) 94 Mispillion River (Milford) 95 Broadki1l River (Milton) 95 Inland Waterway Between Rehoboth Bay and Delaware Bay (Lewes and Rehoboth) 95 Waterway from Indian River Inlet to Rehoboth Bay (Lewes and Rehoboth) 96 Indian River Inlet and Bay (Millsboro) 96 Nanticoke River (including Northwest Fork) Delaware and Mary1~hd (Seaford and Laurel) 96 Broad Creek River (Laurel) 97 New Castle County 97 Wilmington 97 City of New Castle 117 Delaware City 119 Kent County 121 Smyrna 124 Dover 124 Milford 125 ) Sussex County 128 iv ) Seashore 135 Lewes 136 Rehoboth 138 Dewey Beach, Bethany Beach and Fenwick Island 140 V. Some Additional Social Aspects 144 Population ~8 Natural Increase 154 Net Migration 154 VI. A Planning Perspective of Economic and Social Aspects 159 County Plans 167 What of the Future? 173 VII. Bibliographic Notes ~l FIGURES AND TABLES Figure 1. The Natural Coastal Zones of Delaware in 1971 4 Figure 2. Growth Patterns in the Nation's Coastal Population 9 ) Figure 3. Middle Atlantic Estuarine Zone 14 Figure 4. Existing Development Around the Small Bays 18 Figure 5. The Natural Coastal Zones of Delaware 21 Figure 6. The Legalized Coastal Zone of Delaware 23 Figure 7. Historical Variation in Fish Harvests 42 Figure 8. Historical Variations in Oyster Harvests 45 Figure 9. The Mideast Economic Region and Megalopolis Corridor 59 Figure/lO. Delaware's Location in the. Middle Atlantic Coast 60 I Figure 11. Principal Routes to and Through Delaware ' 61 Figure 12. The Delmarva Peninsula 62 Figure 13. Total County Impact Area 81 Figure 14. Highway Impact; Brandywine Hundred 83 Figure 15. Highway Impact; Christiana Hundred 84 ) v ) Figure 16. Surface Transportation Facilities 88 Figure 17. Water Transportation Facilities 89 Figure 18. The 18th & 19th Century Coastal Zone 90 Figure 19. Delaware River and Bay Traffic Areas 101 Figure 20. Port Facilities at Wilmington 102 Figure 21. Tidewater Refinery Piers 103 Figure 22. Industries Located in Delaware'sCoastal Zone 113 Figure 23. Dover Possible Development Area 126 Figure 24. Kent County Industrial Tracts 127 Figure 25. Net Migrations in Delaware (1960-70) 146 Figure 26. Population Density (1970) 147 Figure 27. Fertility Rates by County 155 Figure 28. Kent County Migration Characteristics 156 ) Figure 29. Sussex County Migration Characteristics 156 Figure 30. Water Resources Evaluation 160 Figure 31. Generalized Urban Development 161 Figure 32. Kent County, Urban Land Use 163 Figure 33. New Castle County, Urban Land Use 164 Figure 34. Conservation Criticality 165 Figure 35. Soil Suitability for Urban Development 166 Figure 36. Urban Services 166 Figure 37. Preliminary Development Plan 168 Figure 38. General Shoreline Plan 174 Figure 39. Cape Henlopen Development Plan 1V5 I Figure 40. Potential Areas for Industrial Development 177 . ) Figure 41. Potential Areas for Residential Development 178 Figure 42. Potential Areas of Use Conflict 179 vi ) Table 1. Sportfishing Activity 19 Table 2. Recent Oyster Landings in Delaware 44 Table 3. Recent Clam and Blue Crab Landings 47 Table 4. Relative Magnitude of Menhaden to all Other Delaware Fisheries 49 Table 5. Economic Characteristics of Middle Atlantic Region 64 Table 6. Density of Industrial Development 65 Table 7. Population & Agriculture in the Estuarine Zone 66 Table 8. Receipts by Establishments from Tourism Expenditures 72 Table 9. Receipts by Counties from Tourism Expenditures 73 Table 10. Change in Delmarva Value of Output 75 Table 11. Change in Value of Catch, Delmarva District 76 Table 12. Number of Fishermen on Vessels 77 Table 13. Value of Output and Employment, Fish Processing 78 ) Table 14. Growth Potential Rating 80 Table 15. Con~unities of the Coastal Zone 86 Table 16. Delaware River Tributaries 93 Table 17. Su~ry of Traffic In the Delaware River 100 Table 18. Port of Wilmington Outbound Commodity Tonnage 105 Table 19. Port of Wilmington Inbound Commodity Tonnage 106-107 Table 20. Port of Wilmington Primary Markets Commodities 109 Table 21. Change in Commodity Movements, Port of Wilmington 110 Table 22. Origin and Destination Information, Port of Wilmington 111-112 Table 23. Tributary Population 132 Table 24. Sele~ted Delaware Industrial Employment and Income 143 Table 25. Population of Communities of the Coastal Zone 151-152 Table 26. Population Growth 1900-1970 153 ) ) ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL ASPECTS OF DELAHARE' S COASTAL ZONE ) by Joel M. Goodman ) ) ) 3 PREFACE The purpose of this volume will be to explore some of the social and economic aspects of Delaware's Coastal Zone that help distinguish it from other parts of the state and thus contribute to its comparative uniqueness in the Mid-Atlantic Region. The economic and social aspects of the Coastal Zone of Delaware will be considered from three per­ spectives. First the historical, then the geographical, and finally, a planning perspective. As indicated in the figure below, these are interrelated to some extent, but in order to minimize duplication of information, matter will only be discussed in the context with ) which it is first introduced. Thus, if information is best introduced in a historical context, it will generally not be repeated in another context unless essential to understanding. Although hardly any of the data are first hand, the author's interpretation is, for the most part, original. For the purposes of this document, the Coastal Zone is considered 4 THE COASTAL ZONE OF DELAWARE 1971 '-------' o MILES S lVl:tv JC:RS£Y 6HOf'UflVl: SAY ) 3M/U: UM/r (/r,u ASSAWOMAN _-=o..I.::IIC::..J -- BAY MARYLAND Figure 1 ) 5 to be comprised of two components -- a primary zone and a secondary zone as depicted in Figure 1. Our principal concern, however, will be with the primary component as defined in House Bill 300 of the Delaware Legislature as amended (Coastal Zone Act, chapter 70). Social and economic attributes frequently do not respect natural or man-made boundaries such as those just described. Thus, although most of our efforts will be devoted to the primary zone, at least a part of our discussion will extend far beyond its borders: in some instances, to the very borders of the Middle Atlantic Region and the Northeast Metropolitan Area. The author wishes to express his appreciation to Mr. David Hugg II, of the State Planning Office, for having reviewed this volume. His ) comments contributed much to the completeness of this study of the Coastal Zone of Delaware. ) ) ) ) 7 I. INTRODUCTION The sea has long played a significant role in the development of the United States; consequently interest in this resource and its. shoreline boundary has always been high. Today, however, there is a new sense of concern for this resource. a concern which extends to the contiguous wetlands and estuarine areas, which together with the shore­ line comprise what is now frequently called the Coastal Zone. The driviRg force and urgency of this new concern stem from traditional interests such as the pressures of mounting economic needs and popu­ lation congestion, and also from an increased recognition of the physical and biological deterioration of these resources. The concern culminated in Congressional action in the form of the Marine Resources ) and Engineering Development Act of 1966. Among other things, the Act established a Commission on Marine Science, Engineering, and Resources which after examining, reviewing, and studying the nation's posture relative to marine interests and actiVities, prepared a report and recommended plan of national action for furthering national marine needs and objectives. The report is commonly referred to as "The Stratton Commission Report," and is titled "Our Nation and the Sea." In this report it was noted that the potential for expanded marine-related economic activities must be tempered by the growing recognition of the fact that in many cases man was adversely affecting the environment which so lavishly offered these opportunities. It , 8 ) was argued that if adequately protected, this coastal zone could also provide unique and valuable opportunities for recreation. If not protected, than contamination or destruction of beach, marsh, waterway, and shoreline could only result in denying the use of the sea to our growing population: nationally in 1966, as shown in Figure 2, that amounted to 45% of the population. In the Northeast, much closer t·) home, that number is roughly 66% of the population. The two most visible parts of the Coastal Zone, as defined by environmental and geographic features, are the shoreline and estuary. They were singled out by the Commission as presenting some of the most urgent environmental problems and also the most immediate and tangible opportunities for improvement. The Commission noted that in many respects, the shoreline and estuaries are the nation's most valuable ) geographic features: traditionally, the greater part of the nation's trade and industry takes place there; they are among the most biologi­ cally productive regions of the nation; they are traditionally also the site of numerous other activities such as shellfishing, pleasure boating, and other forms of recreational activity.
Recommended publications
  • Leipsic River Watershed Proposed Tmdls
    Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control Leipsic River Watershed Proposed TMDLs Arden Claymont Wilmington Bellefonte Newark New Castle Delaware City Odessa Middletown Smyrna Clayton 13 Leipsic Kenton Cheswold Dupont Manor Hartly Dover Little Creek Bowers Frederica Houston Harrington Slaughter Beach Greenwood Ellendale Milton Lewes Bridgeville Rehoboth Beach Millsboro Bethel Dagsboro Bethany Beach Frankford South Bethany Selbyville Fenwick Island DNRE007 August 2006 PREFACE The draft Proposed TMDLs for the Leipsic River watershed were reviewed during a public workshop held on 11 May, 2006. All comments received at the workshop and during the May 1 through 31 comment period were considered by DNREC. This report has been updated to address public comments by Mid-Atlantic Environmental Law Center (Sections 1.1, 2.0, 4.0, 4.2, 6.1, 6.4 and 6.5). i CONTENTS Section Page PREFACE...............................................................................................................................................................i CONTENTS .........................................................................................................................................................ii FIGURES..............................................................................................................................................................iii TABLES ................................................................................................................................................................iv
    [Show full text]
  • Sussex County
    501 ALLOWANCES AND APPROPRIATIONS. Dolls. Ct,. Amount brought forward, 3,3137 58 To Lowder T. Layton, for damages on new road, 15 00 Albert Webster, do do 05 Appropriation for opening and making said road, 20 00 William K. Lockwood, commissioner on road, 2 days, 2 00 Albert Webster, do 3 3 00 T. L. Davis, do 3 3 00 George Jones, do 2 2 00 William Nickerson, do 2 2 00 Alexander Johnson, surveyor, 7 00 John Cox, for damages on road, 50 00 William Slay, do 06 David Marvel, do 06 Martha Day, do 06 Appropriation to open and make said road, 150 00 $3,642 31 March Session. Thomas S. Buckmaster, for overwork under a resolu- tion, 3 89 Isaac L. Crouch, for work on jail, 87 Joshua Nickerson, for work on a bridge, 2 08 S. C. Leatherberry, cryer of the courts, 20 62 Joab Fox, for work on a bridge, 9 87 James Jones, assessor for Duck Creek hundred, 29 38 Nathan Soward, Little Creek " 25 56 William Slaughter, Dover, " 27 56 John Sherwood, Murderkill, " 34 02 John Quillen, Milford, " 26 46 Henry W. Harrington, Mispillion, " 27 00 Dr. Isaac Jump, for medicine for prisoners in jail, 4 50 William Hirons, commissioner on road, 1 00 Thomas Stevenson, justice peace, for fees, 15 35 Alexander J. Taylor, late sheriff, board of prisoners and fees, 352 51 James B. Richardson, coroner, for fees, 17 23 John P. Coombe, justice of the peace, for fees, I 00 George Smith, commissioner oo new road, 1 00 Joho Ha wk ins, for excess of tax, for the years 1848-9, 12 98 John Sherwood, for services dividing school districts, I 00 Am,unt carried forward, $4,356 19 502 ALLOWANCES AND APPROPRIATIONS.
    [Show full text]
  • 2025 Metropolitan Transportation Plan
    Wilmington Area Planning Council 2025 Update CONNECTIONS to the st 21 Century 2025 Metropolitan Transportation Plan Adopted February 23, 2000 Wilmington Area Planning Council 850 Library Avenue, Suite 100 Newark, DE 19711 Phone (302) 737-6205 Email [email protected] Fax (302) 737-9584 Web www.wilmapco.org Wilmington Area Planning Council * Council: Anne P. Canby, Secretary, Delaware Department of Transportation, Chairperson Robert J. Alt, Mayor, City of Elkton, Vice Chair Nelson K. Bolender, President, Cecil County Commissioners Jeffrey W. Bullock, Chief of Staff, Delaware Governor’s Office Thomas P. Gordon, County Executive, New Castle County James F. Grant, Mayor, Town of Odessa Marsha J. Kaiser, Director, Maryland Department of Transportation Office of Planning & Capital Programming Raymond C. Miller, Director, Delaware Transit Corporation James H. Sills, Jr., Mayor, City of Wilmington Technical Advisory Committee: Public Advisory Committee: Anna Marie Gonnella, Delaware River & Bay Authority, Chairperson Anita Puglisi, City of Newark Citizen, Chairperson Phil Wheeler, Delaware Department of Natural Resources & Barbara Washam, Upper East Side Neighborhood Association, Vice Chair Environmental Control, Vice Chair Doug Andrews, Delmarva Rail Passenger Association Eugene E. Abbott, Delaware Department of Transportation David Blankenship, Wilmington Department of Public Works David Baker, Southern New Castle County Citizen Anthony J. Di Giacomo, Cecil County Office of Planning and Jan Baty, Newark Planning Commission Zoning & Parks and Recreation Lynn Broaddus, Brandywine Hundred Citizen Bobbie Geier, Delaware Transit Corporation Harry Brown, City of Wilmington Citizen Markus R. Gradecak, Maryland Office of Planning John J. Casey, Delaware Contractors Association Herbert M. Inden, Delaware Office of State Planning Bob Dietrich, Delaware Motor Transport Association Coordination Gwinneth Kaminsky Rivera, Wilmington Department of Planning Dennis Flint, White Clay Creek Bicycle Club James P.
    [Show full text]
  • Delaware Offshore Geologic Inventory 2001 to 2008
    Executive Summary Episodic large storms and trends in long-term shoreline change continue to erode Delaware's beaches. To combat the erosion, beach nourishment is the preferred method for maintaining the Atlantic shoreline of Delaware for the purpose of protecting structures and infrastructure. State, local, and federal governments have contributed to the protection against coastal erosion. There were a number of government-sponsored beach fills between 1957 and 2005, and those amounted to emplacing 9,491,799 cubic yards at a cost of $23,960,001 (DNREC, 2005 spreadsheet). Most of the sand used for these projects came from upland sites and several areas offshore Delaware. As those sites become depleted, new sources of sand must be found. Over the past 18 years, the Delaware Geological Survey (DGS) has compiled a geologic database titled the Delaware Offshore Geologic Inventory (DOGI). This database contains information on the location of potential sand resources from state and federal waters for use in beach nourishment. The DGS has worked in partnership with the US Minerals Management Service (MMS) and the Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control (DNREC) to determine the offshore geologic framework and to identify new sources of beach- quality sand. Also included in the DOGI are vibracores (cores) that were taken from offshore Delaware. The DGS maintains the state’s offshore core repository. This report represents a compilation of data that has been collected for the DOGI from 2001 to 2007 in partnership with MMS. During this time period, a total of 61 cores were collected in the Atlantic waters offshore Delaware for the purpose of determining potential borrow areas that could be used for beach nourishment.
    [Show full text]
  • USGS Pfe , Science for a Changing World \ \C
    USGS pfe , science for a changing world \ \c. £ j* y>8 i V° In cooperation with Dover Air Force Base Assessment of Natural Attenuation of Contamination from Three Source Areas in the East Management Unit, Dover Air Force Base, Kent County, Delaware Water-Resources Investigations Report 98-4153 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey CONVERSION FACTORS, VERTICAL DATUM, AND ABBREVIATIONS Multiply By To obtain inch per year (in/yr) 0.02540 meter per year foot (ft) 0.3048 meter foot per day (ft/d) 0.3048 meter per day foot per year (ft/yr) 0.3048 meter per year mile (mi) 1.609 kilometer Sea Level: In this report, "sea level" refers to the National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929 a geodetic datum derived from a general adjustment of the first-order level nets of the United States and Canada, formerly called Sea Level Datum of 1929. Abbreviated water-quality units used in this report: Chemical concentration for water is given in milligrams per liter (mg/L), or micrograms per liter (jig/L). U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Assessment of Natural Attenuation of Contamination from Three Source Areas in the East Management Unit, Dover Air Force Base, Kent County, Delaware by L Joseph Bachman, Martha L Cashel, and Barbara A. Bekins Water-Resources Investigations Report 98-4153 In cooperation with Dover Air Force Base Baltimore, Maryland 1998 U.S. Department of the Interior Bruce Babbitt, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Thomas J. Casadevall, Acting Director The use of trade, product, or firm names in this report is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Piedmont Forests
    Spring 2009 Guide to Delaware Vegetation Communities Robert Coxe Guide to Delaware Vegetation Communities-Spring 2009 Acknowledgments I would like to acknowledge the contributions and help from the following people for this edition of the Guide to Delaware Vegetation Communities. Karen Bennett, Greg Moore and Janet Dennis of the Delaware Division of Fish and Wildlife Bill McAvoy of the Delaware Natural Heritage Program Dr. John Kartesz of the Biota of North America Program Dr. Keith Clancy and Pete Bowman, Ecologists, formerly of the Delaware Natural Heritage Program Ery Largay and Leslie Sneddon of Natureserve All people unmentioned who made countless contributions to this document. -Take me to the vegetation community keys- Guide to Delaware Vegetation Communities-Spring 2009 Introduction The Guide to Delaware Vegetation Communities is intended to provide a Delaware flavor to the National Vegetation Classification System (NVCS). All common names of communities, except for those not in the NVCS, follow the NVCS. This document is designed for the web and CD only, but desired sections can be printed by users. In this matter, paper and therefore trees can be preserved and impacts to the communities discussed within can be minimized. In spirit of saving these communities please only print those community descriptions that you will use or print none at all. The State of Delaware covers 1,524,863.4 acres of which 1,231,393.6 acres are terrestrial and 293,469.8 acres are water (Table 1). Currently 130 vegetation communities are known to occur in Delaware. Some of the largest vegetation communities/land covers in the state include: Table 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Numerical Study in Delaware Inland Bays
    NUMERICAL STUDY IN DELAWARE INLAND BAYS BY LONG XU, DOMINIC DITORO AND JAMES T. KIRBY RESEARCH REPORT NO. CACR-06-04 AUGUST 2006 CENTER FOR APPLIED COASTAL RESEARCH Ocean Engineering Laboratory University of Delaware Newark, Delaware 19716 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT This study was supported by the Delaware Sea Grant Program, Project Number SG205-07 R/ETE-5 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ............................... vi LIST OF TABLES ................................ xiii ABSTRACT ................................... xiv Chapter 1 INTRODUCTION .............................. 1 1.1 Background ................................ 1 1.2 Outline of Present Work ......................... 6 2 NUMERICAL MODELS .......................... 9 2.1 Hydrodynamic Model (ECOMSED) ................... 9 2.1.1 Hydrodynamic Module ...................... 10 2.1.2 Surface Heat Flux Module .................... 12 2.1.3 Boundary Conditions ....................... 14 2.1.4 Numerical Techniques ...................... 15 2.2 Water Quality Model (RCA) ....................... 16 2.2.1 Conservation of Mass ....................... 16 2.2.2 Model Kinetics .......................... 17 2.2.3 Boundary Conditions ....................... 19 3 MODEL IMPLEMENTATION FOR DELAWARE INLAND BAY SYSTEM ................................... 20 3.1 Model Domain .............................. 20 3.2 Model Grid ................................ 21 iv 3.3 Model Settings .............................. 21 3.4 Indian River Inlet Boundary Condition ................. 21 3.5 Freshwater Discharge ..........................
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Sand-Resource Assessment of the Delaware Shelf
    FEDERAL SAND-RESOURCE ASSESSMENT OF THE DELAWARE SHELF Technical Report for Cooperative Agreement M14AC00003 Kelvin W. Ramsey, C. Robin Mattheus, John F. Wehmiller, Jaime L. Tomlinson, Trevor Metz Delaware Geological Survey University of Delaware May 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ......…………………………………………………………………………………. 1 INTRODUCTION …………………………………………………………………….…….…… 2 Motivation …………………………………………………………………….…………. 2 Objectives ………………………………………………….………………….….……… 4 Background ……………………………………………………………………………… 4 Delaware Shelf Stratigraphy ………..……………………..…………….……….. 4 Delaware Coastal Plain Geology …………………………………….…………... 6 METHODS AND DATA MANAGEMENT …………………..………………………….…….. 8 DGS-BOEM Survey Area …..…………………………………………………………… 8 Stratigraphic Framework Mapping ………………………………………………………. 8 Geophysical Data ………………………………………………………………… 8 Core Data ……………………………………………………………………….. 11 Surface and Volume Models ……..…………………………………………………….. 12 GEOLOGIC MAPPING RESULTS …...……………………………………………………….. 12 Seismic Mapping …………….…………………………………………………………. 12 Subsurface Interpretations …………………………………….………….…….. 12 Seismic Units, Bounding Surfaces, and Facies …………………………. 13 Lithologic Mapping …………………………………………………………………….. 14 Sheet sand (Qss)..………………………………………………….……….…… 14 Shoal sand (Qsl) ………………………………………………………………… 16 Intershoal (Qis) …...………………………………………………….…………. 16 Ravinement lag deposits (Qrl) …………….………………….…….…….…….. 16 Lagoonal/Estuarine (Ql, Qlh, Qsi, Qo) ………………………………………….. 16 Marine sand (Qms).……………………………………………………….…….. 17 Fluvio-deltaic (Tbd)..…………………………………………………………… 17 SEDIMENT
    [Show full text]
  • United States Department of the Interior National Park Service
    NFS Form 10-900 (Rev. 10-90) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES INTERAGENCY RESOURCES DiVlt REGISTRATION FORM NATIONAL PARK SERVICE This torsi is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. 1. Name of Property historic name Springer-Cranston House________________________ other names/site number CRS # N-12931________________________ 2. Location 1015 Stanton Road __ not for publication n/a Marshallton. Mill Creek Hundred _________ vicinity __ code DE county New Castle____ code 003 zip code 19808 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1986, as amended, I hereby certify that this x nomination __ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property x meets __ does not meet the National Register Criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant __ nationally __ statewide _x__ locally.
    [Show full text]
  • RI53 Geology of the Seaford Area, Delaware
    State of Delaware DELAWARE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Robert R. Jordan, State Geologist REPORT OF INVESTIGATIONS NO .. 53 GEOLOGY OF THE SEAFORD AREA, DELAWARE by A. Scott Andres and Kelvin W. Ramsey E -10 o o -10 -10 Alluivial deposits Oaf Nanticoke deposits On .. Swamp deposits Osw Beaverdam Formation Tbd With a contribution on palynology by Johan J. Groot University of Delaware Newark, Delaware 1996 State of Delaware DELAWARE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Robert R. Jordan, State Geologist REPORT OF INVESTIGATIONS NO. 53 GEOLOGY OF THE SEAFORD AREA, DELAWARE by A. Scott Andres and Kelvin W. Ramsey With a contribution on palynology by Johan J. Groot University of Delaware Newark, Delaware 1996 CONTENTS Page Page ABSTRACf 1 Other Quaternary deposits 8 Marsh deposits 8 INTRODUCTION 1 Swamp and alluvial deposits 9 Purpose and Scope 1 Upland bog deposits ............................. .. 9 Location 1 Previous work ........................................ .. 1 GEOMORPHOLOGY 9 Acknowledgments 4 Floodplains 9 Upland Surfaces 10 METHODS OF STUDY 4 PALYNOLOGY OF THE SEAFORD AREA 14 STRATIGRAPHY 4 General Observations 14 Chesapeake Group 4 Palynomorph assemblages ofthe Choptank Formation 4 Beaverdam Formation 14 St. Marys Formation 5 Palynomorph assemblages ofthe Manokin Formation 5 Quaternary Sediments 14 Beaverdam Formation 6 Relation to previously recognized units 6 SUMMARY - GEOLOGIC HISTORY 15 Composition and textures 6 Tertiary 15 Thickness, distribution, and bounding relations 7 Quaternary 15 Nanticoke deposits 7 Quaternary depositional model 20 Relation to previously recognized units 7 REFERENCES CITED 21 Composition and textures 7 Thickness, distribution, and bounding relations 8 ILLUSTRATIONS Page Figure 1. Map showing area ofthe Seaford East and Seaford West quadrangles 2 2. Geologic map ofthe Seaford area, Delaware 3 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Delaware's 2009 HPMS Submission Comments
    May 26, 2010 Office of Highway Policy Information Federal Highway Administration 400 Seventh Street, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20590 Attention: HPPI-20, Room 3306 RE: Delaware HPMS 2009 Dear Sir/Madam: We are submitting herewith the 2009 HPMS Data in accordance with the reporting requirements. Area and Population The 2009 HPMS information reflects the 2000-Census Urban Boundaries. The Land area and Population are presented below: Area (Square Location Miles) 2009 Population Middletown, DE 3.5 6,829 Dover, DE 58.6 73,836 Georgetown, DE 3.6 8,618 Lewes, DE 17.3 18,550 Long Neck, DE 11.8 10,045 Milford, DE - Kent 5.5 5,866 Milford, DE - Sussex 6.3 8,774 Ocean View, DE 10.4 9,965 Philadelphia, PA--NJ--DE--MD 188.2 495,025 Salisbury, MD--DE 0.6 1,276 Seaford, DE 15.6 23,707 Smyrna, DE - Kent 6 16,045 Smyrna, DE - New Castle 1.1 72 Rural 1,625.50 206,692 Total Urban 328.5 678,607 Total Rural 1,625.50 202,925 Total State 1,954 881,532 2009 Delaware HPMS Comments May 26, 2010 Page 2 of 58 The Land Area was calculated in accordance with HPMS guidelines. This year’s calculations match the 2000 Census measurements of Delaware’s total land area of 1,954 square miles. Based on the 2000 Census data, the Delaware Population Consortium provided the following population data and forecasts for each county of the State. Area (Square County Population Miles) 2000 2007 2008 2009 Census New Castle 427 500,265 525,624 528,536 532,083 Kent 589 126,697 151,505 155,142 157,430 Sussex 938 156,638 187,952 188,597 192,019 Total State 1954 783,600 865,081 872,275 881,532 2009 Delaware Certification Public Mileage On May 7, 2010, Delaware reported 2009 Certified Public Miles to the FHWA.
    [Show full text]
  • GM18 Geologic Map of the Bethany Beach and Assawoman Bay
    DELAWARE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY DELAWARE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY University of Delaware, Newark GEOLOGIC MAP OF THE BETHANY BEACH AND ASSAWOMAN BAY QUADRANGLES, DELAWARE David R. Wunsch, State Geologist GEOLOGIC MAP SERIES NO. 18 6' 75° 4' 2' 75° 0' 0" W 75° 7' 30" W 38° 37' 30" N EXPLANATION 38° 37' 30" N 10 Qd Qscy Qm Delaware Seashore State Park LONG NECK RD f Qm 1 FILL OMAR FORMATION Qo Qd Qm f 3 Man-made and natural materials (sand, gravel) emplaced in stream valleys or marshes to Light-gray to gray, silty clay to silty, very fine sand with scattered shell beds. The Omar Qd Qscy f 3 Formation consists of up to 5 ft of light to dark-gray, basal, pebbly, coarse to very coarse L O N G N E C K 7 Qss bring the topography above grade, usually in road beds, dams, or construction near a 20 shoreline. Fill deposits include sediment dredged from the marshes and offshore in sand that grades upward into 1 to 3 ft of gray to very dark-gray, fine to coarse silty sand Tbd f Qm Qm Indian River Bay and emplaced on the uplands. with scattered laminae to thin beds of peat composed of sand to gravel-size plant Steels Qbw 40 Qm Big Ditch fragments. The sands are overlain by 3 to 5 ft of very dark-gray to black organic-rich Cove f Qfs Qscy Qns sandy silt to silty clay. Above this organic-rich zone, in the areas where the Omar is 6 Qqw of Holocene lagoon (Ql) at depth thickest, 10 to 40 ft of greenish-gray, compact, silty clay to clayey silt is common.
    [Show full text]