DOCSLIB.ORG

Revision Draft

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Revision Draft Marine Stewardship Council fisheries assessments Lloyd’s Register 6 Redheughs Rigg South Gyle Edinburgh, EH12 9DQ United Kingdom T +44 (0)13 1335 6600 E [email protected] www.lr.org Ross Sea Toothfish Longline Announcement Comment Draft Report February 2020 Conformity Assessment Body (CAB) Lloyd’s Register Assessment team Andy Hough, Paul Medley, Jo Akroyd Argos Froyanes Limited, Sanford Limited, Talley’s Group Limited, Ervik Havfiske AS, Pesquerias Fishery client Georgias SL, Australian Longline Pty Ltd, and Taurus Logistics Group LP Assessment Type Third Reduced Reassessment LR MSC Reduced Reassessment Template 20190419 www.lr.org LR Announcement Comment Draft Report Ross Sea Toothfish Longline Assessment Data Sheet CAB details Lloyd’s Register Address 6 Redheughs Rigg Edinburgh EH12 9DQ Phone/Fax 0131 335 6662 Email [email protected] Contact name(s) Kate Morris Client details Argos Froyanes Limited, Sanford Limited, Talley’s Group Limited, Ervik Havfiske AS, Pesquerias Georgias SL, Australian Longline Pty Ltd, and Taurus Logistics Group LP Address Clarendon House PO Box HM 1022 HM DX Hamilton, Bermuda Phone/Fax +44 (01635) 31525 Email [email protected] [email protected] Contact name(s) Peter Thomson Jack Fenaughty Assessment Team Team leader / Principle 2 Andy Hough Principle 1 Paul Medley Principle 3 Jo Akroyd LR MSC Reduced Reassessment Template 20190419 Page 2 of 120 www.lr.org LR Announcement Comment Draft Report Ross Sea Toothfish Longline 1 Executive summary ......................................................................................... 5 1.1 Changes since previous assessment ........................................................................ 6 1.1.1 Principle 1 ........................................................................................................................ 6 1.1.2 Principle 2 ........................................................................................................................ 6 1.1.3 Principle 3 ........................................................................................................................ 6 2 Report details .................................................................................................. 7 2.1 Authorship and peer review details ............................................................................ 7 2.2 Version details ........................................................................................................... 8 3 Unit(s) of Assessment and Certification and results overview ......................... 9 3.1 Unit(s) of Assessment and Unit(s) of Certification ..................................................... 9 3.1.1 Unit(s) of Assessment ..................................................................................................... 9 3.1.2 Unit(s) of Certification .................................................................................................... 10 3.2 Assessment results overview................................................................................... 10 3.2.1 Determination, formal conclusion and agreement ........................................................ 10 3.2.2 Principle level scores..................................................................................................... 10 3.2.3 Summary of conditions - TBC ....................................................................................... 11 3.2.4 Recommendations ........................................................................................................ 11 4 Traceability and eligibility .............................................................................. 12 4.1 Eligibility date ........................................................................................................... 12 4.2 Traceability within the fishery ................................................................................... 12 4.3 Eligibility to enter further chains of custody ............................................................. 14 4.4 Eligibility of Inseparable or Practicably Inseparable (IPI) stock(s) to enter further chains of custody 14 5 Scoring .......................................................................................................... 15 5.1 Summary of Performance Indicator level scores ..................................................... 15 5.2 Principle 1 ................................................................................................................ 16 5.2.1 Principle 1 background .................................................................................................. 16 5.2.2 Catch profiles ................................................................................................................ 22 5.2.3 Total Allowable Catch (TAC) and catch data ................................................................ 23 5.2.4 Principle 1 Performance Indicator scores and rationales .............................................. 24 ............................................................................................................. 24 ....................................................................................................... 26 ...................................................................................................... 26 ................................................................................ 30 ...................................................................................... 32 ..................................................................................... 35 5.3 Principle 2 ............................................................................................................... 38 5.3.1 Principle 2 background .............................................................................................. 38 5.3.2 Principle 2 Performance Indicator scores and rationales....................................... 46 ........................................................................................ 46 LR MSC Reduced Reassessment Template 20190419 Page 3 of 120 www.lr.org LR Announcement Comment Draft Report Ross Sea Toothfish Longline ................................................................... 48 .................................................................................... 51 ................................................................................... 53 .............................................................. 55 ............................................................................... 58 ............................................................................................. 60 ........................................................................ 62 ......................................................................................... 65 .................................................................................................... 67 ............................................................................... 69 ................................................................................................ 72 ................................................................................................ 74 ........................................................................... 76 ............................................................................................ 78 5.4 Principle 3 ............................................................................................................... 80 5.4.1 Principle 3 background .............................................................................................. 80 5.4.2 Principle 3 Performance Indicator scores and rationales....................................... 83 ......................................................................... 83 ................................................................... 86 ............................................................................................... 91 ...................................................................................... 93 .................................................................................... 95 ................................................................................. 99 .......................................... 102 6 Appendices ................................................................................................. 104 6.1 Assessment information ......................................................................................... 104 6.1.1 References .................................................................................................................. 104 6.1.2 Previous assessments ................................................................................................ 107 6.1.3 Small-scale fisheries ................................................................................................... 108 6.2 Evaluation processes and techniques ................................................................... 109 6.2.1 Site visits ..................................................................................................................... 109 6.2.2 Stakeholder participation ............................................................................................. 109 6.2.3 Evaluation techniques ................................................................................................. 109 6.3 Peer Review reports .............................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Downloaded from the CCAMLR Website at the CCAMLR Scheme of International Scientific Observation Webpage (
    Scheme of International Scientific Observation Scientific Observer’s Manual Finfish Fisheries Version 2020 Address 181 Macquarie Street, Hobart, Tasmania 7000, Australia Web www.ccamlr.org Telephone +61 3 6210 1110 Post PO Box 213, North Hobart, Tasmania 7002, Australia Email [email protected] Fax +61 3 6224 8744 This manual is produced in the official languages of the Commission (English, French, Russian and Spanish) and may be downloaded from the CCAMLR website at the CCAMLR Scheme of International Scientific Observation webpage (www.ccamlr.org/node/73033). Version Release date Observer forms covered Description 2011 01/12/2010 2011 – 2015 Longline Original 2011 – 2015 Finfish Trawl 2011 – 2015 Krill Trawl 2019 Draft 01/10/2018 2019 Longline Draft version presented at 2019 Finfish Trawl WG-FSA-18 for review by 2019 Krill Trawl Members 2020 For release: 2020 Longline Presented to WG-EMM-2019 for 01/09/2019 2019 Finfish Trawl endorsement 2 Table of Contents 1. Introduction 5 2. SISO observer roles and responsibilities 5 3. Definition of terms 6 4. CCAMLR regulations 7 5. General operational procedures 8 6. Units and formats 9 7. Standard measurements 9 7.1 Fish 9 7.2 Skates and rays 10 8. Weights 11 9. Sexing and maturity stages 11 9.1 Toothfish 11 9.2 Skates and rays 14 10. Otolith collection and storage 15 10.1 Removing otoliths 15 10.2 Otolith storage 18 11. Conversion factor tests – finfish fisheries 18 12. Target Species Identification Guide 19 12.1 Toothfish 19 12.2 Patagonian toothfish 19 12.3 Antarctic Toothfish 20 12.4 Toothfish species differences 20 12.5 Mackerel icefish 22 13.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of Longnose Skates Zearaja Chilensisand Dipturus Trachyderma (Rajiformes: Rajidae)
    Univ. Sci. 2015, Vol. 20 (3): 321-359 doi: 10.11144/Javeriana.SC20-3.arol Freely available on line REVIEW ARTICLE A review of longnose skates Zearaja chilensis and Dipturus trachyderma (Rajiformes: Rajidae) Carolina Vargas-Caro1 , Carlos Bustamante1, Julio Lamilla2 , Michael B. Bennett1 Abstract Longnose skates may have a high intrinsic vulnerability among fishes due to their large body size, slow growth rates and relatively low fecundity, and their exploitation as fisheries target-species places their populations under considerable pressure. These skates are found circumglobally in subtropical and temperate coastal waters. Although longnose skates have been recorded for over 150 years in South America, the ability to assess the status of these species is still compromised by critical knowledge gaps. Based on a review of 185 publications, a comparative synthesis of the biology and ecology was conducted on two commercially important elasmobranchs in South American waters, the yellownose skate Zearaja chilensis and the roughskin skate Dipturus trachyderma; in order to examine and compare their taxonomy, distribution, fisheries, feeding habitats, reproduction, growth and longevity. There has been a marked increase in the number of published studies for both species since 2000, and especially after 2005, although some research topics remain poorly understood. Considering the external morphological similarities of longnose skates, especially when juvenile, and the potential niche overlap in both, depth and latitude it is recommended that reproductive seasonality, connectivity and population structure be assessed to ensure their long-term sustainability. Keywords: conservation biology; fishery; roughskin skate; South America; yellownose skate Introduction Edited by Juan Carlos Salcedo-Reyes & Andrés Felipe Navia Global threats to sharks, skates and rays have been 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Worse Things Happen at Sea: the Welfare of Wild-Caught Fish
    [ “One of the sayings of the Holy Prophet Muhammad(s) tells us: ‘If you must kill, kill without torture’” (Animals in Islam, 2010) Worse things happen at sea: the welfare of wild-caught fish Alison Mood fishcount.org.uk 2010 Acknowledgments Many thanks to Phil Brooke and Heather Pickett for reviewing this document. Phil also helped to devise the strategy presented in this report and wrote the final chapter. Cover photo credit: OAR/National Undersea Research Program (NURP). National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration/Dept of Commerce. 1 Contents Executive summary 4 Section 1: Introduction to fish welfare in commercial fishing 10 10 1 Introduction 2 Scope of this report 12 3 Fish are sentient beings 14 4 Summary of key welfare issues in commercial fishing 24 Section 2: Major fishing methods and their impact on animal welfare 25 25 5 Introduction to animal welfare aspects of fish capture 6 Trawling 26 7 Purse seining 32 8 Gill nets, tangle nets and trammel nets 40 9 Rod & line and hand line fishing 44 10 Trolling 47 11 Pole & line fishing 49 12 Long line fishing 52 13 Trapping 55 14 Harpooning 57 15 Use of live bait fish in fish capture 58 16 Summary of improving welfare during capture & landing 60 Section 3: Welfare of fish after capture 66 66 17 Processing of fish alive on landing 18 Introducing humane slaughter for wild-catch fish 68 Section 4: Reducing welfare impact by reducing numbers 70 70 19 How many fish are caught each year? 20 Reducing suffering by reducing numbers caught 73 Section 5: Towards more humane fishing 81 81 21 Better welfare improves fish quality 22 Key roles for improving welfare of wild-caught fish 84 23 Strategies for improving welfare of wild-caught fish 105 Glossary 108 Worse things happen at sea: the welfare of wild-caught fish 2 References 114 Appendix A 125 fishcount.org.uk 3 Executive summary Executive Summary 1 Introduction Perhaps the most inhumane practice of all is the use of small bait fish that are impaled alive on There is increasing scientific acceptance that fish hooks, as bait for fish such as tuna.
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.A Review of Longnose Skates Zearaja Chilensis and Dipturus Trachyderma (Rajiformes: Rajidae)
    Universitas Scientiarum ISSN: 0122-7483 [email protected] Pontificia Universidad Javeriana Colombia Vargas-Caro, Carolina; Bustamante, Carlos; Lamilla, Julio; Bennett, Michael B. A review of longnose skates Zearaja chilensis and Dipturus trachyderma (Rajiformes: Rajidae) Universitas Scientiarum, vol. 20, núm. 3, 2015, pp. 321-359 Pontificia Universidad Javeriana Bogotá, Colombia Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=49941379004 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative Univ. Sci. 2015, Vol. 20 (3): 321-359 doi: 10.11144/Javeriana.SC20-3.arol Freely available on line REVIEW ARTICLE A review of longnose skates Zearaja chilensis and Dipturus trachyderma (Rajiformes: Rajidae) Carolina Vargas-Caro1 , Carlos Bustamante1, Julio Lamilla2 , Michael B. Bennett1 Abstract Longnose skates may have a high intrinsic vulnerability among fishes due to their large body size, slow growth rates and relatively low fecundity, and their exploitation as fisheries target-species places their populations under considerable pressure. These skates are found circumglobally in subtropical and temperate coastal waters. Although longnose skates have been recorded for over 150 years in South America, the ability to assess the status of these species is still compromised by critical knowledge gaps. Based on a review of 185 publications, a comparative synthesis of the biology and ecology was conducted on two commercially important elasmobranchs in South American waters, the yellownose skate Zearaja chilensis and the roughskin skate Dipturus trachyderma; in order to examine and compare their taxonomy, distribution, fisheries, feeding habitats, reproduction, growth and longevity.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the Workshop on Deep-Sea Species Identification, Rome, 2–4 December 2009
    FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Report No. 947 FIRF/R947 (En) ISSN 2070-6987 Report of the WORKSHOP ON DEEP-SEA SPECIES IDENTIFICATION Rome, Italy, 2–4 December 2009 Cover photo: An aggregation of the hexactinellid sponge Poliopogon amadou at the Great Meteor seamount, Northeast Atlantic. Courtesy of the Task Group for Maritime Affairs, Estrutura de Missão para os Assuntos do Mar – Portugal. Copies of FAO publications can be requested from: Sales and Marketing Group Office of Knowledge Exchange, Research and Extension Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations E-mail: [email protected] Fax: +39 06 57053360 Web site: www.fao.org/icatalog/inter-e.htm FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Report No. 947 FIRF/R947 (En) Report of the WORKSHOP ON DEEP-SEA SPECIES IDENTIFICATION Rome, Italy, 2–4 December 2009 FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS Rome, 2011 The designations employed and the presentation of material in this Information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of FAO.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Exploitation of Elasmobranchs, with Emphasis on Cowtail Stingray Pastinachus Sephen (Family Dasyatidae)
    On the Exploitation of Elasmobranchs, with Emphasis on Cowtail Stingray Pastinachus sephen (Family Dasyatidae) The Pew Charitable Trusts On the Exploitation of Elasmobranchs, with Emphasis on Cowtail Stingray Pastinachus sephen (Family Dasyatidae) D. Pauly, S. Booth, V. Christensen, W.L., Cheung, C. Close, A. Kitchingman, M.L.D. Palomares, R. Watson, and D. Zeller Sea Around Us Project Fisheries Centre The University of British Columbia 2202 Main Mall Vancouver, Canada, V6T 1Z4 2 Sea Around Us: Exploitation of Elasmobranchs TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary................................................................................................................ 4 Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 5 Fishery biology of Stingrays, with emphasis on Pastinachus sephen.................................... 6 ‘Stock assessments’ using time series data of catches ...........................................................9 Analyses of catch time series of rays by FAO area..........................................................10 Analyses of catch time series of rays by LME .................................................................11 Summary of results from FAO areas and LME................................................................ 13 Rays in ecosystem models: experience from the Gulf of Thailand......................................14 More on the intrinsic vulnerability of rays, and particularly P. sephen ..............................
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Fish As Predators of Krill (Euphausia Superba) and Other Pelagic Resources in the Southern Ocean
    CCAMLR Science, Vol. 19 (2012): 115–169 THE ROLE OF FISH AS PREDATORS OF KRILL (EUPHAUSIA SUPERBA) AND OTHER PELAGIC RESOURCES IN THE SOUTHERN OCEAN K.-H. Kock* Institut für Seefischerei Johann Heinrich von Thünen Institut Palmaille 9 D-22767 Hamburg Germany Email – [email protected] E. Barrera-Oro Dirección Nacional del Antártico Ministerio de Relaciones Exteriores, Comercio Internacional y Culto Buenos Aires Argentina M. Belchier British Antarctic Survey High Cross, Madingley Road Cambridge CB3 0ET United Kingdom M.A. Collins Director of Fisheries/Senior Executive Government of South Georgia and South Sandwich Islands Government House Stanley Falkland Islands G. Duhamel Museum National D’Histoire Naturelle 43 rue Cuvier F-75231 Paris Cedex 05 France S. Hanchet National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research (NIWA) Ltd PO Box 893 Nelson New Zealand L. Pshenichnov YugNIRO 2 Sverdlov Street 98300 Kerch Ukraine D. Welsford and R. Williams Australian Antarctic Division Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities 203 Channel Highway Kingston, Tasmania 7050 Australia 115 Kock et al. Abstract Krill forms an important part of the diet of many Antarctic fish species. An understanding of the role of fish as krill predators in the Southern Ocean is critical to understanding how changes in fish abundance, such as through fishing or environmental change, are likely to impact on the food webs in the region. First attempts to estimate the krill and pelagic food consumption by Antarctic demersal fish in the low Antarctic were made in the late 1970s/ early 1980s. Those estimates were constrained by a paucity of biomass estimates and the mostly qualitative nature of food studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Trends in Global Shark Catch and Recent Developments in Management
    TRENDS IN GLOBAL SHARK CATCH AND RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN MANAGEMENT by Mary Lack and Glenn Sant Published by TRAFFIC International, Cambridge, UK. © 2009 TRAFFIC lnternational. All rights reserved. All material appearing in this publication is copyrighted and may be reproduced with permission. Any reproduction in full or in part of this publication must credit TRAFFIC International as the copyright owner. The views of the authors expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of the TRAFFIC network, WWF or IUCN. The designations of geographical entities in this publication, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of TRAFFIC or its supporting organizations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The TRAFFIC symbol copyright and Registered Trademark ownership is held by WWF. TRAFFIC is a joint programme of WWF and IUCN. Suggested citation: Lack, M. and Sant, G. (2009). Trends in Global Shark Catch and Recent Developments in Management. TRAFFIC International. Front cover illustrations: Spotted Ray Raja montagui, Blue Shark Prionace glauca and Whale Shark Rhincodon typus Illustration credits: Bruce Mahalski UK Registered Charity No. 1076722 Trends in Global Shark Catch and Recent Developments in Management Mary Lack1 and Glenn Sant2 May 2009 1 Shellack Pty Ltd 2 Global Marine Programme Leader, TRAFFIC INTRODUCTION In 2006, 2007 and 2008 TRAFFIC reported on total shark3 catch and the top 20 shark-catching countries (Lack and Sant, 2006; Anon, 2007; Lack and Sant, 2008). Those analyses have been based on the Fishstat Capture Production Database of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO).
    [Show full text]
  • Sc-Camlr-38 Scientific Committee for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine
    SC-CAMLR-38 SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE FOR THE CONSERVATION OF ANTARCTIC MARINE LIVING RESOURCES REPORT OF THE THIRTY-EIGHTH MEETING OF THE SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE HOBART, AUSTRALIA 21–25 OCTOBER 2019 CCAMLR PO Box 213 North Hobart 7002 Tasmania Australia _______________________ Telephone: 61 3 6210 1111 Facsimile: 61 3 6224 8766 Email: [email protected] Chair of the Scientific Committee Website: www.ccamlr.org November 2019 ________________________________________________________________________________________ This document is produced in the official languages of the Commission: English, French, Russian and Spanish. Copies are available from the CCAMLR Secretariat at the above address. Abstract This document presents the adopted report of the Thirty-eighth Meeting of the Scientific Committee for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources held in Hobart, Australia, from 21 to 25 October 2019. Reports of meetings and intersessional activities of subsidiary bodies of the Scientific Committee, including the Working Groups on Statistics, Assessments and Modelling; Ecosystem Monitoring and Management; Fish Stock Assessment; and the Subgroup on Acoustic Survey and Analysis Methods, are appended. 1031-2889 Contents Page Opening of the meeting ...................................................................... 1 Adoption of the agenda .................................................................... 2 Chair’s report ............................................................................... 2 Advances in statistics, assessments,
    [Show full text]
  • Trophic-Based Analyses of the Scotia Sea Ecosystem with an Examination of the Effects of Some Data Limitations and Uncertainties
    Trophic-based analyses of the Scotia Sea ecosystem with an examination of the effects of some data limitations and uncertainties Sarah Collings Doctor of Philosophy University of York Biology September 2015 Abstract The Scotia Sea is a sub-region of the Southern Ocean with a unique biological operation, including high rates of primary production, high abundances of Antarctic krill, and a diverse community of land-breeding predators. Trophic interactions link all species in an ecosystem into a network known as the food web. Theoretical analyses of trophic food webs, which are parameterised using diet composition data, offer useful tools to explore food web structure and operation. However, limitations in diet data can cause uncertainty in subsequent food web analyses. Therefore, this thesis had two aims: (i) to provide ecological insight into the Scotia Sea food web using theoretical analyses; and (ii) to identify, explore and ameliorate for the effects of some data limitations on these analyses. Therefore, in Chapter 2, I collated a set of diet composition data for consumers in the Scotia Sea, and highlighted its strengths and limitations. In Chapters 3 and 4, I constructed food web analyses to draw ecological insight into the Scotia Sea food web. I indicated the robustness of these conclusions to some of the assumptions I used to construct them. Finally, in Chapter 5, I constructed a probabilistic model of a penguin encountering prey to investigate changes in trophic interactions caused by the spatial and temporal variability of their prey. I show that natural variabilities, such as the spatial aggregation of prey into swarms, can explain observed foraging outcomes for this predator.
    [Show full text]
  • View/Download
    RAJIFORMES (Skates) · 1 The ETYFish Project © Christopher Scharpf and Kenneth J. Lazara COMMENTS: v. 23.0 - 27 June 2021 Order RAJIFORMES Skates 4 families · 38 genera/subgenera · 303 species/subspecies Family ARHYNCHOBATIDAE Softnose Skates 14 genera/subgenera · 110 species Arhynchobatis Waite 1909 a-, without; rhynchos, snout, referring to “absence of a cartilaginous rostral”; batis, Greek for a flat fish, usually applied to a skate or ray Arhynchobatis asperrimus Waite 1909 rough, referring to skin on dorsal surface “everywhere covered with closely set spines” Atlantoraja Menni 1972 Atlanto, referring to distribution of A. castelnaui and A. cyclophora in southwestern Atlantic Ocean; raia, Latin for ray or skate Atlantoraja castelnaui (Miranda Ribeiro 1907) in honor of Francis de Laporte de Castelnau (1810-1880), French naturalist who studied the fishes of Brazil Atlantoraja cyclophora (Regan 1903) cyclo, circle; phora, to bear, referring to ocellus formed by two concentric black circles on each pectoral fin Atlantoraja platana (Günther 1880) -ana, belonging to: referring to mouth of the Río de la Plata (between Uruguay and Argentina), type locality Bathyraja Ishiyama 1958 bathy, deep, referring to deepwater habitat of B. trachouros; raia, Latin for ray or skate Subgenus Bathyraja Bathyraja abyssicola (Gilbert 1896) abyss, deep sea; -cola, dweller or inhabitant, referring to deepwater habitat (type collected at 1588 fathoms) Bathyraja aguja (Kendall & Radcliffe 1912) referring to Point Aguja, Peru, type locality Bathyraja albomaculata
    [Show full text]
  • Trends in Global Shark Catch and Recent Developments in Management
    TRENDS IN GLOBAL SHARK CATCH AND RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN MANAGEMENT by Mary Lack and Glenn Sant Published by TRAFFIC International, Cambridge, UK. © 2009 TRAFFIC lnternational. All rights reserved. All material appearing in this publication is copyrighted and may be reproduced with permission. Any reproduction in full or in part of this publication must credit TRAFFIC International as the copyright owner. The views of the authors expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of the TRAFFIC network, WWF or IUCN. The designations of geographical entities in this publication, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of TRAFFIC or its supporting organizations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The TRAFFIC symbol copyright and Registered Trademark ownership is held by WWF. TRAFFIC is a joint programme of WWF and IUCN. Suggested citation: Lack, M. and Sant, G. (2009). Trends in Global Shark Catch and Recent Developments in Management. TRAFFIC International. Front cover illustrations: Spotted Ray Raja montagui, Blue Shark Prionace glauca and Whale Shark Rhincodon typus Illustration credits: Bruce Mahalski UK Registered Charity No. 1076722 Trends in Global Shark Catch and Recent Developments in Management Mary Lack1 and Glenn Sant2 May 2009 1 Shellack Pty Ltd 2 Global Marine Programme Leader, TRAFFIC INTRODUCTION In 2006, 2007 and 2008 TRAFFIC reported on total shark3 catch and the top 20 shark-catching countries (Lack and Sant, 2006; Anon, 2007; Lack and Sant, 2008). Those analyses have been based on the Fishstat Capture Production Database of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO).
    [Show full text]