The National Question

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The National Question The National Question Decolonizing the Theory of Nationalism James M. Blaut with a Foreword by Juan Mari Bras Zed Books Ltd. London and New Jersey The National Question was first published by Zed Books Ltd. , 57 Caledonian Road, London N19BU, UK, and vi 171 First Avenue, Atlantic Highlands, New Jersey 07716, USA, Acknowledgements in 1987. Foreword Juan Mari Bras vii Copyright © J.M. Blaut, 1987. Preface 1 Foreword copyright © Juan Mari Bras, 1987 Purpose 1 Plan 2 Cover designed by Andrew Corbett . 5 Typeset by EMS Photosetting, Rochford, Essex. Limitations Printed and bound in the United Kingdom 1. Introduction: Six Problems for the Theory ofNationalism 8 by Biddies Ltd., Guildford and King's Lynn . The Theory of Nationalism and the Practice of National All rights reserved Liberation 8 `The National Question' and `Nationalism' 13 First Problem: Is Nationalism a Form of Class Struggle? 17 Second Problem: Is Nationalism Appropriate Only to the BritishLibrary Cataloguingin Publication Data Bourgeois-democratic Revolution? 26 Blaut, James M. Western The national question : Decolonizing the Theory of Third Problem: Did Nationalism Diffuse from Nationality. Europe to the Third World? 29 1. Nationalism Fourth Problem : Does Nationalism Bear Some Special I. Title 320.5'4 JC311 Relationship to Fascism? 33 ISBN 0-86232-439-4 Fifth Problem : Is National Struggle Out of Date? Is the ISBN 0-86232-440-8 Pbk National State an Anachronism in the Era of Multinational Capitalism? 38 Library ofCongress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Sixth Problem: What is the Theoretical Status of the Concept Blaut, James M. (James Morris) `National Minority', and Why Do Some Immigrant The national question. Minorities Remain Unassimilated? 48 Bibliography : p. Includes index. 2. Nationalism as an Autonomous Force 57 581. Nationalism and socialism. 2. National liberation The Classical Critique. movements. I. Title. Post-classical Variations 60 HXSSO.N3B53 1987 320.5'4 87-13281 ISBN0-86232-439-4 The Modern Theory and its Critics 63 ISBN 0-86232-440-8 (pbk .) Some Concluding Comments 69 3, Diffusionism and the National Question 76 Nationalism and Diffusion 77 Nationalism and Fascism 83 Neo-Nationalism and Counter-Diffusion 88 Neo-Marxism and the National Question 97 4. Hobsbawm on the Nation State 101 Hobsbawm's Theses 103 ANote on Terminology 105 Are National Movements Irrational? 106 International Capitalism and the Nation State 112 Hobsbawm and the Marxist Theory of Nationalism 121 5. The Theory ofNational Minorities 142 The Theory of Minorities in Classical Marxism 144 Stalin's Theory 146 Minorities in the Era of Imperialism 151 6. The Myth of Assimilation 159 Rafi Cintr6n, Rudy Lozano, Assimilation 160 Dedicated to the memory of . Ghettoization 163 ~ and Ed Marksman, colleagues and compaiieros Resistance 169 7. Class Struggles across a Boundary 172 The Problem of Eurocentrism in the Marxist Theory of Colonialism and Nationalism 172 Internal and External Class Struggle 176 National Struggles and History 195 National Struggles and Culture 197 8. In Place of a Conclusion 212 Bibliography 214 Index 227 Foreword Acknowledgements Good theory is the accurate generalization of practice . That is why there is no good theory, social, political or whatever, ifit is not predicated on aprofound and Four of the chapters in this book have been adapted from published articles ; extended practice of the matter uponwhich one is theorizing. permission was kindly given by the following publications to reprint them here : This book is an outstanding contribution to Marxist theoryconcerning national Science and Society (Chapter 2); Antipode : A Radical Journal of Geography struggle . The author is very well equipped for the task . In the first place, he has (Chapters 3 and 6); Monthly Review (Chapter 5); and the Puerto Rican been for the last 15 years an activist in the liberationstruggle ofPuerto Rico. Thus, pro-independence newspaper Claridad (the original version of Chapter 6). Many he has been practising national struggle in one of the last frontiers of colonialism people contributed in important ways to the writing of this book and the ideas it in the world today. Secondly, as a professional geographer, he is sensible to the contains (but not its errors) . I wish to express my special gratitude to Abdul significance of physical location in affecting the course of social and historical Alkalimat, Jose Alberto Alvarez, Ramon Arbona, Gini Blaut Sorrentini, the late processes. This is certainly most important in this case . The geographical factor Rafi Cintr6n, Otis Cunningham, Horace Davis, Loida Figueroa, Jose Lopez, springs from his definition of national struggle as "the form of political class Olga L6pez, the late Rudy Lozano, Manuel Maldonado-Denis, Juan Mari Bras, struggle which is associated, in general, with states which are externally Francis Mark, the late Ed Marksman, Robert Molteno, Jose and Mariana governed ." Navarro, Anselme Remy, Antonio Rios-Bustamante, Digna Sanchez, Chris This volume constitutes a critique ofpast Marxist theories of national struggle, Searle, Jose Soler, America Sorrentini de Blaut, Howard Stanton, David Stea, nationalism and, in general, Third World participation in international class Jose Villamil, Dessima Williams and Ben Wisner . struggle . The theories developed derive general concepts from particular experiences, as any piece of sound theory should . The particular experience here d. M. Blaut is the reflection of the debates and discussions in the Puerto Rican liberation movement, and specifically in the socialist current of this movement, as well as amongthe Puerto Rican emigrant community in the United States . Based on these experiences, the author moves with great intellectual lucidity and honesty through some of the most controversial themes of Marxist theory: whether national struggle is something separate from class struggle or an integral and prominent part of it; and even when recognized as a form of class struggle, whether it should be understood as something associated mainly with the bourgeoisie as a class and with the period of early capitalism as a stage of social evolution . In both cases, he proves his point in favour of a class struggle perspective and the universal significance of national struggle for the international working class. It is evident that Lenin has been, so far, the major theoretician for these propositions . Certainly, the political genius who led the first victorious socialist revolution in world history was himself a frontier man from a frontier nation, which made him particularly fitted for such a theoretical discovery. Probably one of his major accomplishments as a theoretician of the social evolution of human Foreword kind was his rupture with the Eurocentric conceptions of Marx and Engels inasmuch as it was necessary to translate Marxist theories into practice in a mostly non-European countrylike Russia. Preface Professor Blaut analyses the propositions mentioned above throughout his book. As for the discussions within the Puerto Rican Independence movement that led to these theoretical confrontations, they have, in my estimation, been largely transcended by history . It is now more evident than a few years ago for anyone, except those with very underdeveloped political minds, that the national liberation struggle of the Puerto Rican independence movement is of the essence of class struggle and that the achievement of independence for Puerto Rico is the major contribution that Puerto Ricans can make to the complete victory of socialism in the world. Yet, the theoretical elaboration of this fact, which some day will be self-evident, is still necessary . Few works can be as valuable as the present one forthe full clarification ofthese points . Purpose It is, however, in chapter seven of this volume that the author makes what I consider a real, outstanding contribution to Marxist theory . His ideas about In every national liberation struggle there is concern about the national question: Eurocentrism and geographical diffusionism as shortcomings of Marxist theory the question of how the fight for political sovereignty is to be carried out and what ought to be seriously considered and developed in the future by many other role it should play in the larger struggle for social justice. The issues are always thinkers. complex and difficult, and always there is a searchforgeneral principles, for theory, As a matter of fact, the creative, political focus of Marxist theory has moved to provide some guidance for practice . ~I will argue in this book that the Marxist substantially from Europe to the Third World throughout the present century. theory of national struggle can offer this kind ofguidance, provided that we adapt Little new is coming from Europe now to enlighten the theory of social evolution the theory to the conditions that are faced in Third World liberation struggles : based on historical materialism during the next epoch. All the dissident varieties conditions of colonialism and neocolonialism . I will also defend the basicor classic of current European socialist thought are rooted in the same theoretical paradigm theory, as it was formulated by Marx, Engels, and Lenin, against the charge that it is caused by the basic defect of Marxism, which is its Eurocentric conception of the not relevant to national liberation struggles in the Third World of the 1980s, and historicaland social processes ofclass societies . against the charge that it somehow defines these struggles as reactionary
Recommended publications
  • Marxism, Stalinism, and the Juche Speech of 1955: on the Theoretical De-Stalinization of North Korea
    Marxism, Stalinism, and the Juche Speech of 1955: On the Theoretical De-Stalinization of North Korea Alzo David-West This essay responds to the argument of Brian Myers that late North Korean leader Kim Il Sung’s Juche speech of 1955 is not nationalist (or Stalinist) in any meaningful sense of the term. The author examines the literary formalist method of interpretation that leads Myers to that conclusion, considers the pro- grammatic differences of orthodox Marxism and its development as “Marx- ism-Leninism” under Stalinism, and explains that the North Korean Juche speech is not only nationalist, but also grounded in the Stalinist political tradi- tion inaugurated in the Soviet Union in 1924. Keywords: Juche, Nationalism, North Korean Stalinism, Soviet Stalinism, Socialism in One Country Introduction Brian Myers, a specialist in North Korean literature and advocate of the view that North Korea is not a Stalinist state, has advanced the argument in his Acta Koreana essay, “The Watershed that Wasn’t” (2006), that late North Korean leader Kim Il Sung’s Juche speech of 1955, a landmark document of North Korean Stalinism authored two years after the Korean War, “is not nationalist in any meaningful sense of the term” (Myers 2006:89). That proposition has far- reaching historical and theoretical implications. North Korean studies scholars such as Charles K. Armstrong, Adrian Buzo, Seong-Chang Cheong, Andrei N. Lankov, Chong-Sik Lee, and Bala、zs Szalontai have explained that North Korea adhered to the tactically unreformed and unreconstructed model of nationalist The Review of Korean Studies Volume 10 Number 3 (September 2007) : 127-152 © 2007 by the Academy of Korean Studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Nation and Working-Class
    NATION AND WORKING-CLASS HEINRICH LAUFENBERG FR ITZ WOLFPH EIM P�ICE MARK 1.20. HAMBURG, END OF JULY, 1920. B U C H V E R L A G W I L L A S C H E K & C o. HA M B U R G 3. :: N E U E R STE f NW E 6 3 • 5. .o arplan rg_J I. Communism is the doctrine of the class struggle of the proletariat within capitalist society. Its goal is the destruction of the capitalist world-system and its replacement by the Commune of the world-economy. Its struggle and mission are international. The very existence of the bourgeoisie and proletariat is determined by the capitalist mode of production. The struggle between bourgeoisie and proletariat moves through nations, tearing them apart with the antagonisms between the classes in enemy camps. But as both classes can only exist so long as capitalist society lasts, at the end of their struggle class-antagonisms in every country will be abolished by the victorious proletariat. By smashing the capitalist form of economy and eradicating the capitalist class-society and wage system, the proletariat abolishes the bourgeoisie and, at the same time, itself as a non-propertied class. In doing so, it deprives class-divisions within nations of their foundations. Communist society sets all working members of a people [Volk] alongside one another, free and equal. It arises out of the socialized labor of a classless people, and comes to completion through the federalist integration of the economy of the classless nations [Völker] in the World Commune.
    [Show full text]
  • Generic Institutionalism
    Die approbierte Originalversion dieser Dissertation ist an der Hauptbibliothek der Technischen Universität Wien aufgestellt (http://www.ub.tuwien.ac.at). The approved original version of this thesis is available at the main library of the Vienna University of Technology (http://www.ub.tuwien.ac.at/englweb/). D I S S E R T A T I O N Generic Institutionalism Evolution – Institution – Complexity ausgeführt zum Zwecke der Erlangung des akademischen Grades eines Doktor der Sozial- und Wirtschaftswissenschaften (Dr.rer.soc.oec) unter der Leitung und Begutachtung von Univ.Prof.Dr. Gerhard Hanappi University of Technology Vienna, Institute for Mathematical Methods in Economics, Research Group Economics und Prof.Dr. Wolfram Elsner University of Bremen, Institute for Institutional- and Innovation Economics eingereicht an der Technischen Universität Wien Fakultät für Informatik von Mag. Manuel Wäckerle Matr.nr.: 0025397 Wien, am 5.10.2010 Unterschrift (Wäckerle) Unterschrift (Hanappi) Unterschrift (Elsner) ii We‘re all gonna be ... Just dirt in the ground Tom Waits iii Kurzfassung Die vorliegende Dissertation beschäftigt sich mit dem wissenschaftlichen Feld der evolutionären institutionellen Ökonomie. Generell verteidigt sie die Idee eines ‚Generischen Institutionalismus‘, welcher auf folgenden Ebenen wissenschaftstheoretisch kritisch hinterfragt wird: Ontologie, Heuristik und Methodologie. Die ontologische Ebene setzt sich mit der Realität von ökonomischen Einheiten und Prozessen auseinander, wobei in dieser Arbeit soziale Relationen – in Welt,
    [Show full text]
  • Religious Sanctions and Economic Results
    Religions 2012, 3, 739–762; doi:10.3390/rel3030739 OPEN ACCESS religions ISSN 2077-1444 www.mdpi.com/journal/religions Article Transfer of Labour Time on the World Market: Religious Sanctions and Economic Results Jørgen Sandemose Department of Philosophy, Classics, History of Art and Ideas, University of Oslo, PO Box 1020, Blindern, Oslo 0315, Norway; E-Mail: [email protected] Received: 18 June 2012; in revised form: 7 August 2012 / Accepted: 10 August 2012 / Published: 21 August 2012 Abstract: This paper investigates the extent to which a term like ―globalization‖, especially in its sense of implying the existence of a system, or of dominant features favouring development towards some system, is adaptable to a theory of a world economy which is to take due notice of the structure of the exchange value of commodities on the world market. A leading idea is that religious outlooks, in the way they were conceptualized by Karl Marx, have a strong bearing upon the difference in labour intensities in countries contributing to the world market, and thereby upon the differences in international values and prices. These differences are expressed in a scale-based, rigid structure on the world market itself—a structure which gives us the fundamental reason why certain specific countries or areas may get steadily poorer in relative terms, while others may constantly get relatively richer through the same mechanism. Consequently, when (as it is done here) religion is taken to express the quintessence of the cultural level of societies, it can be said that the comparative study of religions gives us a key to the understanding of crucial economic differences between nations.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ecological Aspect to Imperialism and Unequal Exchange
    University of Denver Digital Commons @ DU Electronic Theses and Dissertations Graduate Studies 3-1-2014 Foreign Investment in African Resources: The Ecological Aspect to Imperialism and Unequal Exchange Mariko Frame University of Denver Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.du.edu/etd Part of the International Relations Commons Recommended Citation Frame, Mariko, "Foreign Investment in African Resources: The Ecological Aspect to Imperialism and Unequal Exchange" (2014). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 207. https://digitalcommons.du.edu/etd/207 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies at Digital Commons @ DU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ DU. For more information, please contact [email protected],[email protected]. Foreign Investment in African Resources: The Ecological Aspect to Imperialism and Unequal Exchange __________ A Dissertation Presented to The Faculty of the Josef Korbel School of International Studies University of Denver __________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy __________ by Mariko Frame March 2014 Advisor: Dr. Haider Khan ©Copyright by Mariko Frame 2013 All Rights Reserved Author: Mariko L. Frame Title: Foreign Investment in African Resources: The Ecological Aspect to Imperialism and Unequal Exchange Advisor: Dr. Haider Khan Degree Date: March 2014 Abstract This dissertation examines the issue of foreign investment
    [Show full text]
  • Download PDF Version
    Communist Party of India (Marxist) Programme Introduction 1.1 The Communist Party inherited the progressive, anti-imperialist and revolutionary traditions of the Indian people. Since its formation in 1920, by a small group of determined anti-imperialist fighters inspired by the October Socialist Revolution in Russia, the Party had set before itself the goal of fighting for complete independence and basic social transformation. The Party pledged to work for the establishment of a socialist society in India, free from class exploitation and social oppression. 1.2 True to the cause of proletarian internationalism, the Party consistently supported the national liberation movements against the imperialist order and the struggles for democracy and socialism the world over, which were major features of the twentieth century. The Party adopted the principles of Marxism-Leninism as the guide to action for winning national independence, to attain the objective of socialism and to advance towards the ultimate goal of communism. The Communists were the first in the country to raise the demand for complete independence and put forward a resolution for this in the Ahmedabad session of the Indian National Congress in 1921. 1.3 The Communists, while demanding complete independence, also stressed the need for giving a radical content to the slogan of swaraj through a definite programme for social and economic change by including such vital questions as abolition of landlordism, end to feudal domination and elimination of caste oppression. 1.4 The Communists while participating in the freedom struggle, from the outset, devoted their energies to the task of organising workers in trade unions, peasants in the Kisan Sabha, students in their unions and other sections in their respective mass organisations.
    [Show full text]
  • "The National Question" Reconsidered
    From an Ecological Perspective: "The National Question" Reconsidered Jeremy Brecher NINETEEN-EIGHTY-SIX MARK ED THE HUNDREDTH ANNIVERSARY of a general strike throughout the United States for the eight hour day, best remembered today for the trial and judicial murder of the Haymarket Martyrs. That event came to be commemorated in the world-wide holiday May Day celebrating the international solidarity of labor. One hundred years later, May Day was barely acknowledged in North America, while in Moscow's Red Square tanks paraded and jet fighters screamed overhead. Similar celebrations occurred in the Soviet-dominated countries of Eastern Europe and in the anti-Soviet and mutually hostile Communist countries of Asia. The festival of international solidarity has been transformed into a celebration of national power. Yet the insubstantiality of national boundaries was well demonstrated on last year's May Day , not by workers of all lands joining in The Internationale, but by a cloud of radioactive dust circling the globe, carrying the message "Chernobyl is everywhere." It is in this context that I want to reconsider what radicals once called " the national question. " The problems of nationality, nationalism, and the nation state have proved over the past century to be the greatest stumbling blocks to the aspirations for a better world expressed in socialist, anarchist, communist, and related radical movements. Class has not so far proved to be a unifying bond which overcomes the conflicts among different peoples. Nor has the liberation of one people from oppression by another ensured pro-social behavior op the part of the formerly oppressed once in power.
    [Show full text]
  • Nationalism and the Proletarian Revolution Lenin and the Birth Of
    Nationalism and the Proletarian Revolution page 15 m Lenin and the birth of Bolshevism (part two> page 9 DISCUSSION: Marxism-Leninism and Parliamentarism page 5 Review-History of the Albanian Party of labour Editorial NUMBER FIFTEEN AUTUMN 1970 Price 2s comment· At home PREDICTABLY, after its electoral defeat, the La­ to be limited to trying to establish the best con­ bour Party is now preparing to 'move to the left'. ditions in which collective bargaining can take place. The leadership is in some difficulty due to the That it can never go beyond this function is assured absence of a 'left' leader of any .stature who has in many ways, for instance the division between the some semblance of mass support among the work­ industrial .and political wings of the movement, as ing class but a start has been rriade with the election it is so often put. Labour Party and trade union to the Shadow Cabinet of Michael Foot. conference decisions can be safely ignored by MPs because the Parliamentary Labour Party is autono­ The CPGB and some trotskyist factions are well mous and decides its own policies. aware of the strong anti:.Tory sentiments that exist among militant workers and are trying to take ad­ A study of the policies of b~th Labour and Tory vantage of it for the purpose of diverting this basi­ administrations· clearly shows that they differ only cally class feeling into the blind alley of 'pushing on the question of the best way of maintaining the Labour to the left', and if successful, will bring Capitalist system.
    [Show full text]
  • Internationalism and Nationalism
    1952 Speeches/Documents Title: Internationalism and Nationalism Author: Liu Shaoqi Date: Source:. Foreign Languages Press, 1952 Description:. written in 1948, published in 1952 Introduction The revolution concerning the Communist Party of Yugoslavia adopted by the Information Bureau of the Communist Workers' Parties of Bulgaria, Rumania, Hungary, Poland the U.S.S.R., France, Czechoslovakia and Italy condemned the anti-Soviet position of the Tito clique - renegades of the proletariat. The resolution pointed out that this anti-Soviet position of the Tito clique proceeds from the nationalistic programme of the bourgeoisie and is leading to a betrayal of the cause of international unity of the working people and to a nationalist position. The resolution stated: “Such a nationalist position can only lead to Yugoslavia's denegation into an ordinary bourgeois republic, to the loss of its independence and to its transformation into a colony of the imperialist countries.” The resolution of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China on the Yugoslav Party also pointed out that the Tito clique, because of its betrayal of a series of fundamental viewpoints of Marxism -Leninism, had fallen into the mire of bourgeois nationalism and bourgeois parties.. At the same time, our Central Committee pointed out that by passing this resolution, the Information Bureau was “fulfilling its obligations to the cause of preserving world peace and democracy, and of defending the people of Yugoslavia from the deception and aggression of American imperialism.” What, then, is bourgeois nationalism? What is the relation between Marxism-Leninism and the national question? Why is it that the anti-Soviet position of the Tito clique will make Yugoslavia a prey to the deception and aggression of American imperialism, and forfeit her independence, thereby transforming her into a colony of imperialism? The purpose of this article is to answer these questions.
    [Show full text]
  • Nationalism, Ethnic Conflict, and Class Struggle: a Critical Analysis of Mainstream and Marxist Theories of Nationalism and National Movements
    NATIONALISM, ETHNIC CONFLICT, AND CLASS STRUGGLE: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF MAINSTREAM AND MARXIST THEORIES OF NATIONALISM AND NATIONAL MOVEMENTS Berch Berberoglu Department of Sociology University of Nevada, Reno Introduction The resurgence of nationalism and ethnonationalist con ict in the aftermath of the collapse of the Soviet Union and its associated Eastern European states in their transition from a form of socialism to a market- oriented direction led by bourgeois forces allied with world capitalism during the decade of the 1990s, has prompted a new round of discus- sion and debate on the origins and development of nationalism and the nation-state that has implications for contemporary nationalism and nationalist movements in the world today. This discussion and debate has been framed within the context of classical and contemporary social theory addressing the nature and role of the state and nation, as well as class and ethnicity, in an attempt to understand the relationship between these phenomena as part of an analysis of the development and transformation of society and social relations in the late twentieth century. This paper provides a critical analysis of classical and contemporary mainstream and Marxist theories of the nation, nationalism, and eth- nic con ict. After an examination of select classical bourgeois statements on the nature of the nation and nationalism, I provide a critique of contemporary bourgeois and neo-Marxist formulations and adopt a class analysis approach informed by historical materialism to explain the class nature and dynamics of nationalism and ethnonational con ict. Critical Sociology 26,3 206 berch berberoglu Mainstream Theories of the Nation and Nationalism Conventional social theories on the nature and sources of national- ism and ethnic con ict cover a time span encompassing classical to con- temporary statements that provide a conservative perspective to the analysis of ethnonational phenomena that have taken center stage in the late twentieth century.
    [Show full text]
  • No. 32, January-February, 2011
    January-February 2011 No. 32 The $2 €2 Internationalist From Resistance to Counteroffensive to the Struggle for Workers Power FocalFocal PointPoint Europe:Europe: CapitalismCapitalism inin Crisis,Crisis, ClassClass StruggleStruggle EruptsErupts Claude Platiau/Reuters Greece on the Razor’s Edge. 16 France: Worker-Student Upsurge. 51-64 Australia $2, Brazil R$3, Britain £1.50, U.S. War on North Korea Never Ended. 39 Canada $2, Europe €2, India Rs. 50, Japan ¥200, Mexico $10, Philippines 50 p, Mobilize Against Attacks on Muslims . 81 S. Africa R10, S. Korea 2,000 won 2 The Internationalist January-February 2011 In this issue... Denounce FBI Raids on Leftist Antiwar Order Now! and Solidarity Activists ............................ 4 This bulletin contains the Focal Point Europe: Capitalism in analysis by Karl Marx of Crisis, Class Struggle Erupts ................. 5 slavery under capitalism and his key writings on Fury of Student Revolt Shakes Up Britain ... 8 the second American Revolution. The new Greece on the Razor’s Edge ..................... 16 edition adds articles Free Julian Assange! Drop All Charges! .... 28 by George Novack on slavery and the U.S./South Korean Provocations plantation system in Could Ignite New Korean War ............... 33 North America, as well as polemics on the U.S. War on North Korea Never Ended ..... 39 policy of communists on the Civil War. France: May in October? The Spectre of a New ’68 ....................... 51 US$1 To Drive Out Sarkozy & Co. Order from/make checks payable to: Mundial Publications, Box 3321, Fight for Power to the Workers ............ 56 Church Street Station, New York, New York 10008, U.S.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Karl Marx's Conception of International Relations
    Knrl Marx's Conception of International nelations Karl Marx's Conception of International Relations Regina Buecker Even though Marx was not widely read during his own time and Marxism, as a political system may be outdated, at least from the present perspective, Karl Marx remains an iconic figure of the 19th century. One of its most influential and controversial philosophers, his thinking has influenced not only the ideology of former and present communist countries, but also the international system as a whole. His theories have had a deep impact on academic studies, and while he did not address the field of international relations directly, much may be derived from his writings on certain phenomena, such as colonialism and nationalism, which are crucial in international relations. The purpose of this paper is to provide a better understanding of Marx's notions of international society. In the following essay, a short overview of Marx's world, concept of man, the state, class and international relations will be given. Finally, the relevance and contributions of Marx's thought to the theory and practice of international relations is analyzed. Historical Context Europe, during Marx's life, was a place "of tremendous social, political and economic change".1 Until Bismark declared on "18th January 187l...the foundation of the German Empire ... " Germany was divided into 38 states of different size and power, and was economically underdeveloped. Almost within one generation, Germany overtook Britain, with respect to 'dynamic development'. The Prussian government, the major political and military unit in Germany, in Marx's time, was conservative and opposed to most reforms.2 Marx was born in 1818 in Trier, a Prussian city near the French border.
    [Show full text]